Pricing gap issue

Hi
Experts,
As we are in to implementation of a project, the thing is i just want to have few gaps which were a solved earlier in pricing so that i can have some idea about it . I would be greatful if u could send me some gaps in pricing which were filled .
thanks

Any pricing condition key combination, which doesnt available in pricing field catelog, you need to add / append these fields in pricing communication structure(KOMG) & transfer to Header / Item level pricing tables such as KOMP / KONK.
eg: Freight capture , depends on
" Incoterms / shipping conditions / dep. zone / destination zone / forwarding agent & Zfield"
then , Zfield is not available while creating cond table. so field has to be created in KOMG first. once its available in KOMK/KOMP , create cond table.
" adding new fields in pricing & trasferring to transaction" , search in forum will find earlier threads with very good explanation.

Similar Messages

Pricing date issue

Hello All,
We have an issue with the Line item pricing date.
In our project we are using the supersession functionality; we have one sales order with header pricing date ex: 25.12.2008 with some line items, for line item 10 we have created superesession material on 01.01.2009 with other material and maintained the pricing condition records validity date same as 01.01.2009.
We maintained in a way that if the material is not available and superseded material is available one job will run and creates the new line item with superseded material and copies the all information from the old line item. Here the problem is it copied the old material pricing date as 25.12.2008 due to this the new line item price is not calculated because the condition record is available from 01.01.2009 and it is disable mode.
Can any one give an idea how to solve the above issue.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivas Kapuganti

Hi Srinivas,
reading the answer above, there are 2 ways to solve your problem:
1) Modify the logic that determines the pricing date
2) Use the pricing reference material field (i.e. workaround)
Unfortunately in the landscape currenly i'm working, I haven't installed APO... So I cannot make any tests in a similar landscape.. however I can try to suggest to you something...
Concerning the "idea" N. 2 you have:
A) To check (from a "business point of view") if superseeded material and the new material have the same price.. I think so.. In the past I've worked as consultant in an A&D company and we have implemented supersession.. Usually, from a "commercial point of view" no impact on pricing must be "charged" to the customer because "supersession". So, usually, the superseeded material and the new one has the same pricelist...
B) From a "technical" point of view, try change manually the sales order updated by APO BOP and fill (manually) the field VBAP-PAMTN (item detail, tabstrip "Sales B") and, please, check if SAP determines the correct price condition record.
C) If test in point B is "ok".. I think that when BOP try to change the sales order, the userexit move_field_to_vbap will be called (include MV45AFZZ).. If you are able to understand to which "old" SO item is referred the new one, you can use this exit to fill VBAP-PMATN field of the new item with the superseeded material code (the old one)....
Advantage:
1) You don't have to change the program called by RFC from APO (maybe it requires an out of standard solution? I don't know..). You have "only" to implement an userexit..
2) SD pricing date will be, also for the new item, the 25.12.2008; but, in this case, SD will be able to find (via PMATN field) the pricing condition record linked to the superseeded material. This solution is Ok if hypotesis in point A) is correct. Otherwise it make no sense.
Sorry for quite long answer. Hope this help.
Have a nice day - Massimo

Pricing Computing issue..

Hi,
In the pricing procedure, I made two condition type is statistical.
During the net value calculation it considers the statistical condition type values also.
Strange, can you suggest, is there any other place other v/08, do we need to maintain statistical value?
Little urgent issue.. help need

Hi,
Thanks for your effort.
But, I can't restructure my pricing procedure.It should be the same way what i mentioned.
You guys say, if I mention 50 to 80, it will consider the statiscal value also?
New apporach
I created a new alternative calculation type and attached to nete value calculation. which will calculate 50 +60 +80.
But, why SAP strangly behaves?

Pricing calculating issue

Hi,
I have a specific issue regarding pricing:-
The requirement is that the following entry should be passed in accounting while billing:-
Dr. Revenue 100
Cr. AR 100
Dr. Cost of sales 5
Cr. TAX payable 5
For this requirement we have maintained a condition of TAX in pricing, assigned accrual key & account key & it is determined on net price. We have also assigned G/L (both columns) for the same in VKOA.
I copied from WUST as ZWUS, and checked it as accrual conditon type. and the GL documents are created successfully.. BUT no accural account is hitting for Dr. Cost of sales 5
Cr. TAX payable 5.....
Pls help !!!

Hi,
Can you confirm whether you have maintained the Accrual account key in V/08 for the TAX condition type.
For Account key (ex. ERB), you should maintain the G/L account in VKOA.
For Accrual you should maintain the G/L account and Provision Account.
For your reference you can check the Rebate condition types BO02 in Pricing procedure RVAA01 in V/08 and also check the Account Assignment in Account key combination in VKOA.
Hope this info will solve your problem.
Regards
M. Lakshmi Narasimhan

Pricing calculation issue.

Hi,
I have a specific issue regarding pricing:-
The requirement is that the following entry should be passed in accounting while billing:-
Dr. Revenue               100
Cr. AR                         100
Dr. Cost of sales         5
Cr. TAX payable           5
For this requirement we have maintained a condition of TAX in pricing, assigned accrual key & account key & it is determined on net price. We have also assigned G/L (both columns) for the same in VKOA.
Now, when we create a order, in the pricing, the net value just above the conditions is showing Rs. 105. How can we possibly configure in the system. I tried making TAX condition as both Discount/Surcharge & Taxes.
Thanks in advance.

first of all,
what makes you to maintain accounting entries as mentioned in your post.
as you know, Total value of the billing document will be Debited to Customer a/c- & then the same amount will be distributed in different heads . ( excluding statistical / accrual conditions)
Eg:
Customer Dr - Rs. 105/-
Revenue Cr - Rs.100/-
Tax Cr - 5/-
Cost of Goods sold already accounted when you perform PGI. Why you want the same after releasing invoice?
It would be more helpful, if you post the complete requirement & clear.

Gap issue between Firefox and IE

Hi
I am a newbie to the Dreamweaver stage.
Busy putting together my first website, but have an issue with spacing.
There is a gap between my logo and menu bar in Firefox, but displays normally in IE6.
Is there any way that I can resove this?
I messed around a bit with my CSS file, but to no avail.
I googled a bit on the net, and see quite a lot of people got issues with this...
Any help with this problem will be appreciated
Thank you

http://css-tricks.com/margin-0-padding-0-no-longer-cool/
See if that helps. It introduces you to the idea of setting zero default padding and margin using a global CSS rule. It's something that a lot of people use but it seems is now going out of fashion a little.
That might be a part of your difficulty. As I understand it different browsers introduce their own default styles and these are not consistent accross all elements or browser flavours. The disadvantage of setting all padding and margin to zero is that you have to put it back in where you need it. There's quite a lot of discussion to be read on the internets but for a simple page it works.
Of course, posting a link to your page would be a better way of enabling others to pin-point your problem.
Regards
Martin

Codition type for pricing Master Issue

Dear All,
For my domestic pricing procedure I created one condition type for Tax Calculation, where I put condition Condition Class : Tax(D) and Calculation Type : Fixed Value (B) only and maintained in the pricing procedure.
But at the time of making PO when I put certain value in amount field it is not calculating in Condition value field of the PO item.
So kindly suggest me the solution regards to resolve this issue.
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Dear Ramesh/Harsh,
This this special condition type I required for only show the value (reference purpose) which was drawn from TAXINN procedure and show the total PO value in condition tab both in header and item wise.
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Brazil Pricing Procedure Issue

Hi Guys,
We have a pricing condition BX7O. Though the conditions are not statistical, when we process teh Sales Order, the condition is turning to be statistical.
Any reason why this can happen ? Any clue on when a condition can become statistical even if we dont mark it as stats in Pricing Procedure?
Please help as its an urgent issue.

HI
Check the condition Type if it Tick the Field Accruals ,then system will automatically shows the Statistical
and also Check the VKOA settings provision account
Regards.
Prasanna
Edited by: prasanna_sap on Feb 4, 2012 6:49 AM

Pricing type issue in returns invoice

Hi all.
we have a returns sales order.The basic price has condition type ZPR1. The value of the same is 100 eur . the pricing date in return sales order is 20.1.10.
now a returns delivery is made on 20.1.10 but the PGI is done on 1.2.10. Now as per standard SAP, the PGI date is 1.2.10. Now when the returns invoice is made , the bill date is 1.2.10 since PGI is 1.2.10(standard sap). Further the pricing date in returns invoice is also 1.2.10 since as per standard SAP, the pricing date in billing is equal to billing date.
But the value of conditon type ZPR1 is 150 EUR. it has changed since the system is not picking up the value from the previous document i.e. 100 eur from returns sales order. The pricing type is X in copy control between LR delivery and RE invoice. Pricing type "X" is customised and it is defined as copy pricing elements unchanged(like pricing type G plus redetermine condition with cond categ U).
plus users are not able to change the pricing date in invoice too manually
further condition type ZPR1 has condition category as blank which means it shud not be redetermined to 150 eur from condition records at billing time.
OSS note 24832 has been used for pricing type X. the coding is done as mentioned in this note. i have written to SAP but they say it is a consulting issue and not an issue with standard program
my questions are as follows:
a) the pricing date in billing is equal to bill date as per standard sap.So in this case, since the billing date is 1.2.10 and so the pricing date is 1.2.10 in returns billing. My question is, since the pricing type is X(pricing elements unchanged like G +redetermined cond cat U),the pricing date in billing shud be the date in the sales order which is 20.1.10.... is this makes sense ?
how does it happen if one uses standard pricing type G(copy pricing elements unchanged), does the pricing date gets copied from sales order into billing or the pricing date is equal to bill date(copied from PGI) in billing but the conditon values are copied from sales order into invoice ?
b) if one thinks that issue is with our customised pricing type X, what inputs shud i give to programmers. what are the copy control tables and fields and structure they need to look into to see how things are behaving and in which user exit ?
regds

HI Vasudeva,
agreed but i have questions
1) when pricing type is G, the system copies the pricing from sales order (price source is blank)
no how abut pricing date. i mean in case of pricing type G, where is the pricing date is copied from.... is it from sales order or the pricing date =billing date=PGI date .................the standard way and condition valuesare copied from sales order)
I mean iam intersred in relation between pricing type G and pricing date source.
2) how can i influence pricing date caluclaion... where in copy control or eixt ?
regds

Pricing Performance issues

When we enter the line and if we change the pricing then it's making multiple calls and the performance is going down drastically. Even saving a order is taking 10 to 15 minutes. What's the best practices for the pricing to improve the performance.

137328.1 Tuning Advanced Pricing for Optimal Performance
130511.1 PERFORMANCE Issues In OM, SE, QP
169935.1 Troubleshooting Oracle Apps Performance Issues
113492.1 Troubleshooting Guide for Pricing Issues

Iphone 6 plus screen gap issue

I just opened up my brand new iphone 6 plus 64gb gold, and i noticed at the bottom left side where the screen meets the metal part of the phone there is a tiny gap, it's noticeable tho. When i push the bottom corner down the gap disappears but return when i let go.
Is this a known problem?? Has anyone else experienced this?
Thanks

I feel your pain! I have the same problem with my new iPhone 6. My iPhone 5s has cooler/brighter whites, but my iPhone 6 with a supposedly better screen shows them warmer/duller. I stopped at two T-Mobile stores this morning to compare my phone with their display models, and in both cases my phone look dull and drab. Because of the warmer whites, text has less contrast and therefor looks blurrier, too. I was considering going to an Apple Store to see if they could exchange the phone, but as you've demonstrated there's no guaranty that you'll get a better phone. After spending $850 on what I thought was a phone with a bigger, better display, I now wish I'd just stayed happy with my 5s or even considered switching back to an Android phone.

Pricing procedure issue ..

Hi Expert,
I have assigned pricing procedure to sales org. 1500 so that i am able to create sales order through VA01. I have assigned it through view V_T683V. Now i want to create MAM order in sales org. 1500 but at the time of creation i am getting error message as "No pricing procedure assigned". MAM order is created with tcode JHA1x.
Please tell me what settings i need to do ?.
Thanks.

Thanks for your inputs Balaji,
Below is the error message which i am getting and it's diagnosis.
Pricing procedure could not be determined
Message no. J7 513
Diagnosis
The pricing procedure is determined using the sales area, a document pricing procedure in the sales document type and a customer determination procedure in the sold-to party's customer master. The system was unable to determine a pricing procedure in sales area for document pricing procedure and customer determination procedure .
Procedure
You can either change the customer determination procedure in the sold-to party's customer master or set up a pricing procedure in sales area for document pricing procedure and customer determination procedure .
From this could you please tell me where exactly i need to make changes?

Codition type (JADC) for pricing Master Issue

Dear All,
In my Import pricing procedure I maintained one condition type JADC for Additional Excise Duty, For the same condition class :A,Calculation Type:A and condition category:B. and configured properly in Import calculation schema.But when I am putting any percentage in Import PO and going to provide excise commissioner vendor code the field is not coming over their. Mean while with same condition type settings all other conditions like CVD,Chess on CVD are working properly.
So kindly guide me is their any other settings has to be made for coming these field in PO ??
waiting for your earliest replay
Thanks and Regards
AKS

Hi
Try this
Goto FTXP enter your tax code,and goto environment select calculation procedure and select procedure and select your procedure and control,check wheather youc condition type JADC is maintained in that .
Thanks

Depot pricing procedure issue

We are trying to configure Depot Sales. I have done stock transfer from manufacturing plant to Depot. GR was done based on replenishment delivery and excise document entry . now when i am doing sales from depot the excise amount that i captured at plant through j1iin has to be passed to depot. We have set 356 routine and EXD accounting key in depot pricing procedure ZJDEPO for JEX2, JEEC & JA1Y condition type.
After release to accounting of billing document generated in depot, the excise entries calculated on base price at depot is getting posted. Our requirement is to pass the same excise duty amount that we paid while removing the material from factory to be passed to the customer.
Correct me if there is any mistake in my pricing procedure. Please suggest how i can pass the same amount to the customers.

i have already done all settings for depot & the excise values are flowing from plant to depot using alternate calculation type 356. but the values captured in JMOD , JECS & JA1X financial condition records gets transferred to depot. the base price in stock transfer pricing procedure is 40000 and the base price set at depot is 36000.
so the excise calculated at plant is 4000, 40, 80. in depot after doing J1IJ the same values are getting passed for jex2, jeec & ja1y. but for jmod, jecs & ja1x the values are 3600, 36, 72 which is posted in accounts after release to accounts.so please suggest how to pass the correct excise amount to accounting.

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 pricing date issue

Hi
I am creating the PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1 but its picking pricing date as delevery date.
from POSCHEDULE.
Can anybody guide in this regards. what parameter are supposed to pass for the getting pricing date.
Regards
Sagar

Hi Eric,
Thanks for your reply.
In the BAPI we are passing
          poheader          = ls_poheader_bapi
          poheaderx         = ls_poheaderx
          testrun           = iv_testrun
          no_authority      = lc_check
          no_price_from_po = lc_check
        IMPORTING
          exppurchaseorder = lv_exppurchaseorder
          expheader         = ls_expheader
        TABLES
          return            = lt_return
          poitem            = lt_poitem_bapi
          poitemx           = lt_poitemx
          poschedule        = lt_poschd_bapi
          poschedulex       = lt_poschdx
          poaccount         = lt_poacc_bapi
          poaccountx        = lt_poaccx
          pocondheader      = lt_pocondheader
          pocondheaderx     = lt_pocondheaderx
          pocond            = lt_pocond_bapi
          pocondx           = lt_pocondx
          polimits          = lt_poesh_bapi
          pocontractlimits = lt_poesuc_bapi
          poservices        = lt_poser_bapi
          posrvaccessvalues = lt_poserac_bapi
          poservicestext    = lt_postext_bapi
          potextheader      = lt_pohtext_bapi
          potextitem        = lt_poitext_bapi.
here in this case its not picking the pricing date.
Regards
Sagar

Pricing gap issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for