Problem in accessing Parent Message ID in Enhanced Receiver determination

Hello All,
Following is the scenario.I have a source file and two target receivers.I need to access the Parent Message ID.I am using following code in an UDF.
String headerField;
java.util.Map map;
// get runtime constant map
map = container.getTransformationParameters();
// get value of header field by using variable key
headerField = (String) map.get("MessageId");
return headerField;
But it is returning the message id for the second receivers.
Any suggestions would be of gr8 help

Check the description of MessageId.
MESSAGE_ID
The message ID. It can change during communication. Response messages get a new message ID.
If new messages result from a message (the message is copied at multiple receivers), the new messages get new message IDs.
Reffer this link : http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/e2/e13fcd80fe47768df001a558ed10b6/frameset.htm

Similar Messages

How to access Parent Message ID

Hi,
I am having File IDOC scenario and also we are having dynamic interface determination where base on some particular value in file we are generating two different IDOCs. The overall scenario is working fine.
Now in SXMB_moni I am getting one parent node and under that there are two sub nodes. Also for there are 3 different message ID (one for parent and 2 for sub node.) .
If we scroll sxmb_moni screen (in alv grid) there we are finding Message ID and Parent Message ID for sub node. I am able to access message id for subnode but not able to access Parent Message ID.
To access message ID, I am using following UDF.
String headerField="";
java.util.Map map;
// get constant map
map = container.getTransformationParameters();
headerField = (String) map.get(StreamTransformationConstants.MESSAGE_ID);
return headerField;
I have already tried all Runtime Constants in <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b3/9a2aeb24dc4ab6b1855c99157529e4/frameset.htm">http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b3/9a2aeb24dc4ab6b1855c99157529e4/frameset.htm</a>
If anyone guide me to access Parent message id then it would be really great.
Thanks,
Sunil

Hi Bin,
thanks for reply...
I have tried this but there is blank output.
Thanks,
Sunil Bhavsar

Problem with Enhanced Receiver Determination

Hi Friends,
I am doing the enhanced receiver determination scenario, But it is giving the
error in SXMB_MONI like this
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 Fehler beim Parsen der Empfänger-Liste.Länge des XML-Dokuments 264 System expected the element 'Receivers'</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
this is error is coming in the SXMB_MONI
THE DATA type(Receivers) we create in basis component is comes automatically?
are we have to create?
in my scenario i creted manually,
is it compulsory to specify the properties for the party and agency?
is it compulsory to create 2 Receiver structures in msg structure?
if yes what r those, actually i used from sap.help.com,
Can any body should give me the solution for this, regarding mapping and configuration , if anybody experienced this scenario. Pls . give me the guidelines to do.

Hi,
the mapping creating the receiver list is not producing the required element "Receivers" from Namespace "'http://sap.com/xi/XI/System". Look to the operation mapping given in the enhance Receiver Determination (IB Directory) and detect the corresponding mapping program (ESR). Copy the source payload from MONI, test the mapping program and correct it.
Regards,
Udo

Problem while determining receivers in enhanced receiver determination

i am doing scenario FILE-TO-FILE (with one sender and 2 receivers, dynamic receiver identification based on mapping)using enhanced receiver determination,
it is giving following error in MONI,
Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping
System expected the element 'Receivers'
pls. help me if anybody experienced this scenario,
i am doing this scenario based on the below blog.
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16

Have u properly followed the weblog,
Integration Repository Step No 2 and Step No 5
2. In order to use the enhanced receiver determination, create a message mapping which has the target message as Receiver Determination in the SAP BASIS --> http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
5. Create the Interface Mapping 
U must have checked that ur Xi is on SP 16 or above )
Regards,
Prateek

Problem in enhanced receiver determination

hi all
I was doing enhanced receiver determination in that i got following problem
at first i copied abstract interface ReceiverDetermination from SAP BASIS to my component then i created my mapping program containing one udf related to my scenario.I also created one interface mapping but when i went in the directory then
my this mapping is not coming when i have to choose it after clicking to extended receiver determination in receiver determination.
my objects are already activated in design.the udf is also working properly.
Please reply. This is an urgent issue.

Hi-
Check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm

Intermittent JDBC error in Enhanced Receiver Determination

Hi,
I have an interface that use Enhanced Receiver Determination in PI 7.1 EHP1.
The database is DB2 on i5/os 6.1
Sometimes message ends in error :Error when determining the receiver: Problem while determining receivers using interface mapping: Runtime exception occurred during application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_HI01_to_ReceiverDetermination_;
But the same message with same values is successfull earlier.
This is not a design problem; the interface is working well 95% of the time.
I found some JDBC error in NWA java logs:
Error in sax handler parsing request: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.
Error when calling an adapter by using the communication channel CC_RECEIVER_JDBC_PIDB2 (Party: *, Service: INTEGRATION_SERVER_PX1, Object ID: cb7ea38fb2ac3a06b12d79f5ade2bcf7) XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
Thrown:
com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AFException: XI AF API call failed. Module exception: (No information available). Cause Exception: 'Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'table' (structure 'statement'): java.sql.SQLException: [SQL0104] Token "BUSINESS_SYSTEM" was not valid. Valid tokens: FOR SKIP WITH FETCH ORDER UNION EXCEPT OPTIMIZE.'.
at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.sendMsg(AdapterAccess.java:214)
at com.sap.aii.af.service.api.AdapterAccess.execute(AdapterAccess.java:283)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.AdapterProxyLocal.execute(AdapterProxyLocal.java:119)
at com.sap.aii.ibrun.server.lookup.SystemAccessorInternal.execute(SystemAccessorInternal.java:76)
at com.sap.aii.mapping.lookup.DataBaseAccessor.execute(DataBaseAccessor.java:74)
at com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib7.SelectSingle.selectSingle(SelectSingle.java:54)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor607.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592)
Any idea? Can high volume cause the JDBC Receiver to fail?
Martin

hi,
you r trying to impliment Lookup for the file adapter which is not synch in nature and hance u r not getting the responce back.
please find the link which deals with how to impliment lookup for file adapter.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/file%252blookup%252bin%252budf.
now once u get rhe runtime receiver u can perform enhanced receiver determination (write a simple UDF)
regards,
navneet.

Enhanced Receiver Determination in PI7.1

Hi,
We have a requirement where in we have to use the Enhanced Receiver Determination for one of our scenarios for choosing the receiver.We are on PI7.1.
As of now,we have mapped a constant rcvr(Test_Supplier) to the Service in the message mapping from our source to the target -Receivers, as we do for Enhanced Receiver determination.The rcvr determination choosing Extended and the correct Operation mapping has been configured.The coresponding Interface determination and Receiver agreements have also been configured.
When trying to test this by posting a payload through RWB,we get the No_Receiver_Case_Async error.
Is it necessary to map the party field also in the message mapping?Am I missing something here?Kindly advise.
Thanks and Regards,
Induja

When trying to test this by posting a payload through RWB,we get the No_Receiver_Case_Async error.
Is the Mapping which you developed to determine the receiver(s) able to give the appropriate output? Apart from cache problem, this can also be the issue when the mapping does not produce i.e. no proper service is populated in the corresponding node....the service must be actually present (and active) in ID
Regards,
Abhishek

Enhanced Receiver determination - Fatal Error.

Hi All,
We are using Enhanced Receiver Determination.
We are getting Fatal error in SXMB_MONI though our Intarface mapping is working correctly but when tried testing from runtime work bench we are getting error.
The error message shows
SAP:Code area="RCVR_DETERMINATION">CX_RD_PLSRV</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>Problem when determining the receiver when using the Interface Mapping: During the application mapping com/sap/xi/tf/_Find_Receiver_ a com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException was thrown: Fatal Error: com.sap.engine.lib.xml.parser.Parser~</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
Please suggest any setting needs to be done.
Thanks
Regards,
Ashwin

Hi Ashwin,
Just check if the condtion is correct. Also, look for some typo error as the name is case sensitive.
Also, trigger a delta cache refresh for this receiver determination object after modifying the object.
This should solve your problem.
Regards, Gaurav.

Enhanced Receiver Determination synchronous

Hi all,
I am running into a bit of a problem when using enhanced receiver determination on a SOAP - XI - RFC scenario on a NW2004 SP17 XI system.
According to the help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm) I have to make an interface mapping to the "ReceiverDetermination" async abstract interface.
Here is my problem: "ReceiverDetermination" is asynchronous and my source (SOAP) interface is synchronous, but it seems impossible to define a interface mapping between a synchronous and asynchronous interface.
Do any of you have any ideas and/or suggestions to solve my current predicament?
Steven

Hi,
After some experimentation I found a solution.
It involves building a sync/sync bridge in an Integration Process and using a Receiver Determination step in that Integration Process.
The Integration Process forces you to store the request/response messages in an abstract ASYNC interface. When the Receiver Determination step calls the Receiver Determination Object in the directory, it uses the abstract async interface of the request message, instead of normal sync interface.
This enables you to build an enhanced receiver determination interface mapping using the abstract async interface used to store the message in the integration process.
Steven

Enhanced Receiver Determination for synchronous interface.

Hello!
Was anyone faced with the Enhanced Receiver Determination? When I try to create
the definition of the Interface Mapping, I get the error:
"Interface modi are different. Source interface Message Interface MI_My_sync_iface | urn:my is synchronous. Target interface Message Interface ReceiverDetermination | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System is asynchronous"
Thank you.

Hi ,
U can go through below limks :
Illustration of Enhanced Receiver Determination - SP16
SAP NetWeaver Process Integration: Enhanced Receiver Determination for Synchronous Scenarios
Enhanced Receiver Determination in SAP XI - Exchange Infrastructure - Wiki
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/enhanced%2breceiver%2bdetermination%2bin%2bsap%2bxi
Thanks

Enhanced receiver determination

why we assign the abstract message interface ReceiverDetermination as the target interface.can we achieve enhanced receiver determination without this abstract interface.I have gone through sap help and some blocks of sdn also but still its not clear to me that whats the role of this abstract interface.

Hi
For receiver determination::- See
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/26/5ccd3bb4560f01e10000000a11402f/content.htm
About
Abstract Interface :
The abstract interface work both inbound and outbound interface(Bi directional).
BPM can process messages only through "abstract interfaces" al though Receive and Send steps can have interfaces other then "abstract interfaces" all other intermediat steps of BPM needs "abstract interfaces"
Hope it helps
regards
Piyush

PI 7.1 - Parameter in enhanced receiver determination

Hello experts,
I am working on PI 7.1.
I defined a scenario where I am using an enhanced Receiver determination to determine the list of target services thanks to an operation mapping and its related message mapping. I'd like to pass a constant value from this receiver determination to use it in the message mapping.
To do so, I set an import parameter in the operation mapping and the message mapping and made the needed binding.
I can then see this parameter in the receiver determination, but I can not put a constant value in it and then activate my configuration..
Do you know why ?

Hi
I have not used this feature yet, however I dont think that this is a bug.
the Parameterized mapping feature is for ID->OM->MM & not for RD.
more info
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/43/bbb7fd90f5332ee10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
/people/jin.shin/blog/2008/02/14/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-parameterized-message-mappings
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/909e33f0-738c-2a10-4f87-ce73398bcf08
Regards
Vishnu

Can I Using Enhance Receiver Determination?

Hi,
Can I used Enhanced Receiver Determination to push data to Receiver 2 , based on the response coming from Receiver 1 ( a BPM that that has a synchronous send step and fetches response from SAP through a proxy) ? If yes, how ?
thanks & regards,
XA

We can have just a send step and for that send step we can configure a condition based receiver Determination right?
yeah correct
> and Can you throw some light on how to deal with queues, in case if the response doesnt come from SAP to PI due to some reason, which can happen in real time?
it will thhrow time out exception or message expired exception, if you want to do exception handling do it accrodingly using Control step.
Regards,
Raj

Enhanced receiver determination and value mapping

I want to use enhanced receiver determination functionality in my scenario.
I couldn't see any message interface or data type under http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
we are on Sp08 nw04s and SAP BASIS 7.0 software component in IR.
I don't want to hard code my business service name in mapping.How can I achieve this?
Thanks,
Rekha.
Message was edited by:
Rekha Lather

Hi,
> couldn't see any message interface or data type under http://sap.com/xi/XI/System.
we are on Sp08 nw04s and SAP BASIS 7.0 software component in IR.
After upgradation to SP08 on NW04s , did you reimport the SAP BASIS Component into your IR? Ask your basis admin team to reimport the SAP basis Component into the IR.
>I don't want to hard code my business service name in mapping.How can I achieve this?
Similar discussion available in the comments section of this blog,
/people/venkataramanan.parameswaran/blog/2006/03/17/illustration-of-enhanced-receiver-determination--sp16
Would suggest you use value Mapping.
Regards
Bhavesh

Enhanced Receiver Determination with RFC Lookup

Hi All,
I am building an interface with Enhanced Receiver Determination. Scenario would be that the Receiver Systems would be stored in a Z table in SAP ECC, and in PI Receiver Determination I am doing an RFC look up to find the systems, and using those.
I built the mapping for Receiver Determination, and it tested fine in ESR. But while Creating the Receiver Determination in Integration Directory, After I specify the Receiver mapping name, and put the RFC channel name for the RFC parameter, it doesnt allow me to save the Receiver Agreement with a run time error message
"Link from Receiver Determination | <Sender>| <Interface>| * | * to object type "Channel" with role "122474913b1311deaadb42057dd8b002" is not permitted"
My question is a) if the RFC lookup allowed in the mapping for Receiver Determination?
B) if yes, am I missing someting or is it a system issue?

i have seen Enhanced RD with lookups that work. Have to say it was not a RFC lookup used but rather a DB look in one of the implementations i had worked with. But still I really dont think a RFC lookup should be an issue.
Troubleshoot the lookup mapping to be working other than in the enhanced RD (i.e independently) .
if you head no where, i suggest opening a OSS note.

Problem in accessing Parent Message ID in Enhanced Receiver determination

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for