Problem in OKB9

Hi!
When I'm trying to post a inventory difference in t-code MI07 (movement 701), I receive the following message:
Account 7xxxxx requires an assignment to a CO object
In OKB9, if I fill the Cost Center field for that g/l account, the error ceases to exist. The problem is that I don't what to have a general cost center, but one for each business area/valuation area. I choose the "Acct assignment detail" as "1 - Valuation area is mandatory" and map the Valuation Area-Business Area-Cost Center fields.
Then I post the inventory difference. In the respective accounting document, in the 7xxxxx g/l account line I can see that the cost center called is the general one and not the Valuation Area-Business Area-Cost Center fields.
What should I do in OKB9 to call the right cost center (the Valuation Area-Business Area-Cost Center one)?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Pedro Mariano

Note 367813 - KI235 for goods movements: What should be done?
Check automatic account assignment per business area:
- the business area field must be ready for input (field selection)
- the material must have a division (MARA-SPAR)
- the combination valuation area/division must be maintained (T134H)

Similar Messages

Cost element in FRL in obyc

hi all
we have created external service account as cost element and that is mentioned iin transaction key FRL in obyc
so whenever i am doing the GR for subcontracting posting system will debit the FRL account and will credit the GR/IR account
so at the time of Gr system is asking for the co object now thing is that i cant mention the Cost center there as there is no option in migo for that
my query is do we have to create a new account for FRL and that we should not make up as a cost element but then how we are going to pass the expense entry to controlling module from FI
i

Hi,
There is always an alternative way of defaulting Cost Center for one cost element.You can put default cost center at Cost Element master data. But still I believe , you can solve this problem thru OKB9. Try accessing the tab Default Account Assignment per business area/Valuation area. This tab allows you within one company code and for specific Cost element , to put accross different cost center for different plan/valuation area provided you are working with plant as valuation area concept.
Pls check and let me know
Cheers
Rahul

Default account assigment problem OKB9

Hi,
I wanted to use Payment differences by reason (ZDI) and i set cost account for this. Also i set that account in OKB9 - default account assignment as per profit center. But when i want to post ex.F-28, with payment differences, system, does simulate posting to that account, even split appropriate difference in 2 items (by Profit centers), but does not put cost center that i set in OKB9, in that items. Any Idea why, and solution for this problem.

Hi
Do you want to assign a CO object based on Payment differences reason code??
If yes, use exit RGGBS000... i.e. Create a Substitution in OKC9 and use this exit to write ABAP logic
Br, Ajay M

Good receipt problem for subcontracting purchase order

Good receipt problem for subcontracting purchase order
with account assignment type E.
After update to ECC 6.0. Do good receipt for subcontracting purchase order with account assigment 'E'.The system show the error message(KI235)----Two cost elements (Change in Stock (Subcontracting)&Outside processed fee) haven't CO account assignment.but the field status for sale order is option entry , when I default cost center for the cost element in OKB9.the system post the material document and generate the following accounting document.
Doc.Type : WE ( Goods receipt ) Normal document
Doc. Number    5000056065       Company code    1000         Fiscal year     2007
Doc. date      2007.12.04       Posting date    2007.12.04   Period          12
Calculate Tax
Doc.currency   HKD
tm PK Account    Account short text   Tx Cost Ctr   SaleOrder               Amount
1 89 13500000   Stock-Work in proces                   1007823 10             274.4
2 96 21210010   GR/IR Clearing                             1007823 10             205
3 91 41010102   Chg in Stock(Subcon)    10901099 1007823 10            274.4
4 86 41031000   Outside processed fe     10901099 1007823 10            205
5 99 13500000   Stock-Work in proces                    1007823 10            69.4
6 81 41010101   Cost of Prod (Subco)                      1007823 10           69.40
My problem is:
When use MIGO to do good receipt for subcontracting Purchase order, for consumption account((Change in Stock (Subcontracting)-41010102&Outside processed fee--41031000) ,why the system dont recognize the sale order filled as CO account assignment?

Dear fanny chen
Did you get a solution for your open question?
I`m facing the same problem, so any help yould be appreciated.
Regards

Problem in Purchase Requisition Creation

Dear Experts:
We are facing a problem while purchase requisition creation. We have created an Internal order No. 600406 and an Asset in Company Code AB01 but while creation of Purchase Requisition level when we are selection that Order and Asset in Purchase Requisition system automatically changing my Order no. 600020 instead of 600406. I've checked OKB9 where Order no. maintained as 600020 against Company code AB01 which I deleted and save but after that Purchase requisition asking for Order Number that means we have to maintain Order number in OKB9. Now can you please advise how can we get my current order number in requisition instead of any default number.
Thanks in advance and your kind suggestion is highly appreciated.
Best Regards.
Ripon Kumar Paul

Please find attached screen shots of OME9

PROBLEM IN SETTLEMENT CO88 - G/L 7000203 cannot be created as a co element

Dear friends,
I am facing with an error. Kindly suggest the way how to come up with the issue.
My Client due to some reason passed an JV in the month of december in PRD.
Now after this all the settlement for the next periods are in error. The following is the error while executing CO88.
G/L account 7000203 cannot be created as a cost element
Message no. KQ119
Diagnosis
When maintaining the posting rules for passing on results analysis data to Financial Accounting, you entered a G/L account that is defined as a primary cost element in cost and revenue element accounting. This is not allowed. You must enter a G/L account in the posting rules that is not defined as a cost element.
System Response
The entry invalid.
Procedure
You have the following options:
Enter a G/L account for which no cost element is specified in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting.
You can change the message type with user-defined error management (transaction OPR4_KKA). What should be observed when you enter a G/L account in a posting rule that is defined as a primary cost element in Cost and Revenue Element Accounting? You need to define a CO account assignment so that the posting defined in the posting rule can be executed. You do this with transaction OKB9 (default account assignment) or OKC9 (substitution), or using the default account assignment in the cost element master.
I even tried to create make default the COST CENTER in OKB9 for that cost element as stated in the message itself but still the problem exist. I got another suggestion. Firstly i will transfer the values in new GL a/c, and make the necessary config changes in OKG8 with the new GL a/c.
can somebody guide me whether i am on the right way or is there any work around possible.
regards,
sandeep jain

Hi Sandeep,
In Transaction OKG8 the GL account for P&L(7000203) should not be a cost element. I dont know how it was allowing you all this while.
Try assigning another P&L account without a cost element.
Keep us posted on the progress please.
Thanks
Naveen

CO-PA Problem: Direct postings in FI JV's not Getting Updated in CO-PA

Hello All,
I am facing a probelm in CO-PA, when we are posting a JV in FI With The Cost Object as Cost Center . now we are able to See a FI Document, a CO Document and a Profit Center Document.
When i am going to CO-PA T.code KE24 i am not able to see the any document generated in CO-PA there.
we are only facing such a problem only with direct posting from FI only we are able to derive the COPA Values from Postings from MM & SD documents
Thanks you all in advance
Best Regards,
Ravi Reddy

They should if you tick the tickbox "PrfSeg" in TC OKB9 for the account concerned.
The docu for this checkbox reads:
Indicator: Find profitability segment using substitution
Select this indicator to have the system determine a profitability segment by means of substitution for automatic postings. The corresponding posting is then passed on to Profitability Analysis (CO-PA).
Note that automatic assignments to a profitability segment should only be used under special circumstances for certain accounts and business transactions only.
Typical business transactions for which it makes sense to have a profitability segment found automatically include
The transfer of price differences that are posted in purchasing due to differing order prices or differing prices in invoice receipt (as period costs)
The transfer of expenses or revenues that arise due to a revaluation of material stocks (as period costs)
The transfer of inventory differences (as period costs)
The data is posted to a profitability segment found on the basis of the information found in the FI document. If the information there is not very detailed (not many characteristic values), the data is posted to a higher aggregation level.
Further notes
1. Generally, a profitability segment is found and updated in Profitability Analysis automatically when the corresponding sender document is created (such as when you assign FI postings directly to a profitability segment, or when you create sales orders or billing documents). Therefore, it is not desirable to have the system find a profitability segment for all the accounts relevant to profits by assigning accounts in this function.
2. If, in Materials Management, an account assignment to a profitability segment is required, you need to ensure that in inventory management for the corresponding transaction types, the field status group permits an account assignment to a profitability segment.

Controlling - Cost Center Determination Problem - MM

Hi everyone,
I have a problem concerning Cost Center determination.
My Valuation Area is company code and I use division in order to input to diferent Plants.
I filled all the fields on the OMJ7 transaction.
I also filled all the data in the OKB9 transaction.
The problem appears while posting a Goods Receipt: When a goods receipt is posted, the system just picks the Cost Center informed in the "Valuation Area - Division" and not in the "Plant-Division" of transaction OMJ7.
The data informed in the "Plant-Division" part is working fine in SD, but during GR it does not work and it gets the data in the "Valuation Area - Division" part.
Does anyone can tell me how to make it work the same way in SD and in MM ?
Thanks in advance !
Best regards,
Remi

In OMJ7, there are two linksto maintain the values:
1. Plant - Division (T134G)
2. Valuation Area- Division (T134H)
Both of these refer to two different tables (in brackets above).
SD transactions read the G table and MM transactions read the H table. Hence you need to maintain the settings in both tables.
In my situation, though the plant is the Val area, I had to maintain the entries in both tables.
Cheers.

OKB9 Profit center wise assignment is not allowing.

Dear Experts,
Here iam facing problem like, In OKB9 setting valuation area wise allowing for cost center assignment, Profit Center wise not allowing for cost center assignment.It means it will allow to assign cost centers, but while transacting error troughing like co object missing, if we make setting like valuation area, it not throughing any error.
We can think why cant we go for assignment with valuation area.But we have number of profit centers under one plant, Plant is equal to valuation area, Here iam suppose to go by profit center wise only, please give me a better solution to come out of this issue at the earliest.
Thanking u in advance
Chinni

Hi,
Select 3 in account assignment i.e. Profit Center Mandatory and then give profit center in combination of Cost Center.
May also I know why do u have multiple Profit Centers in a single plant? Generally u can create one profit center for one plant and there by u assign for material and plant combination this profit center. If u follow this process then u can use 1(Valuation area) as mandatory and assign the profit centers/cost centers for each plant.
Regards
Sudhakar Reddy

Depreciation defaulted to one Cost Centre (OKB9)

Good day SAP Experts
One of our companies' depreciation depreciation was defaulted to post one cost centre (Admin). This was set on OKB9, specifying company code, cost element (211110) and the cost centre.
This worked, but now we had to change that each individual cost centre must collect its depreciation expense. We tried to take this entry out of OKB9, when executing the depreciation run an error is experienced saying that a CO assignment is needed for this account. Cost centres are maintained on all assets.
We double checked the GL and cost element, as we are having several companies on the same chart of accounts but different controlling area. Their characteristics in all companies are the same.
Can you please help as to what the problem may be? We also tried to enter all possible Profit Centre and their equivalent cost centres in OKB9, but still get the same error.
Regards
Theo

Dear,
Theo
Unless depreciation account is cost element , posting on cost center will not take place. In your case it is correct.
Going next you assign cost center in asset master and system will post depreciation on that cost center
as your said requirement each cost center assigned in asset master will collect respective value.
Your defiition of depreciation posting to cost center must be set in T.code ACSET and the same must be activated as well.
OKB9 is your default cost element account assignment in terms of Cost center, profit center, Business Area.
Hope this helps you to clarify questioned. If you have any doubts feel free to share.
Regards,
Pankaj A Bhalerao.

Missing some entries in trasaction OKB9 after upgrade to ECC 6.0

We're missing some entries in transaction OKB9 after the upgrade to ECC 6.0. Pariculary, a significant number of records in table TKA3C were not copied over to ECC 6.0.
Have anyone experience this same problem as well. We're at the early stage of unit testing a we're worried that there maybe some other config tables that were not properly copied.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Apollo

Hi friends, i fixed this issue.Its a configuration problem.In table T882 they didnt maintaine fisical variant filed for particular compony code.Once this is maintained the problem got solved

OKB9 Cost Center at Header level

SAP Experts
In one of my sub contracting scenario I have assigned cost element in okb9 for multiple business area with the combination of valuation area, no profit centre is assigned. At the time of posting system is asking for co object assignment for the cost element of sub contracting which is assigned in okb9.
When I am assigning a dummy cost centre at header level of okb9, it works fine.
Please tell me the use of header cost centre in case of multiple cost centre assignment in okb9.
Pavan

Hi Pavan,
I hope you know for which material system returns error message i.e. co object assignment required.Go to material master and find that what kind of division they assigned in the material master, Then go to the transaction code OMJ7 find that division has been assigned to your valuation class, business are or not. If they are not assigned please maintain the division against the valuation area and do the process again. I hope your problem will be resolved please assigned the points.Be ensure okb9 settings are correct.
Regards
Maruthi.

Business area problem in MIRO

Hi Gurus,
In my client place they using business areas, there three business areas created 8100 , 8200,8300
OMJ7 business area assigned to plant.
In miro one of the materai the business area it is taking 8100 it is correct , but where in tha miro
Suncontract charges it is taking 8200 business area, for all subcontract charges it is taking 8200 only,
IN OKB9 also this subcontract gl-cost element assigned three business areas an plnat, but still in case
of subcontract charges it is taking single business area that to it is 8200 only, it is not taking based on plant, this creating a problem, how i solve this issue,
Please advice me.
Regards
Sreenivas.P

Hi
Check is there any substitution written in this case.
Goto TCODE :GGB4
search withe Business area field is there any substitution written.
SKS

Goods Reciept problem

Hi PP Experts,
Can anybody solve my problem please,
When I doind GR by MIGO,I got following error.
"Account 6030010100 requires an assignment to a CO object"
Diagnosis
You have not defined a CO account assignment for an account that is relevant to cost accounting.
System Response
Account 6030010100 is defined as a cost element.
This means that you must always specify a CO account assignment.
How to solve this.
Edited by: Raja S on Nov 5, 2008 10:29 AM
Edited by: Raja S on Nov 5, 2008 10:31 AM

Dear,
Plz check with ur fi consultant gl a/c.
Go to transaction KA02: enter that account (Cost element)and in default acct assinmt tab
assign the Cost Centre.
You have a cost account defined in accounts determination (OBYC). But every cost account must have a cost object associated (production order, cost center, and so on).
You must decide what is the cost object to 'receive' the cost value on the account.
Go to OKB9, insert the account (can be plant dependant) and the cost object, then repeat GR.
Please try and come back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Tax account cost object problem

Hello Experts,
I have configured HST tax codes in ON Canada i.e 5% going in to BS acc and 8% going in to P&L acc. The 8% portion of tax is non recoverable but it reportable thatu2019s why client wants to post it to a separate P&L acc.
Issue isu2026
When I am doing MIRO, I select the HST tax code and simulate it but system is asking for a cost object for this 8% P&L tax acc(off course it is standard), but the real problem is the cost center/WBS element fields are grayed out and I canu2019t enter the cost center here. Clients wants to enter the under lined expenses line item cost center here (doesnu2019t want to default cost center OKB9)
With manual invoice FB60,.. no problem at all,..I can double click the 8% P&L tax acc and enter the cost center.
Please advice how does resolve this issue. Any solutions please welcome.
Regards
Madhu

Madhu,
I did some investigation too and it looks like this is only way i can do this.
Do you think of any User Exit name, which i can use it here?
Thank you and appreciate your help.

Problem in OKB9

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for