Problem transporting table

Dear all,
I have a table which I need to transport to my UAT Server. I have deleted 2 entries in the table and would like to transport the deletion over. However, when I do the deletion, there is no prompt for a transport request.
And when I try to use SM30 to transport the whole table, I keep getting the error message "Transport is not possible for the specified data". Any idea what is wrong?
Thank you.

Hi Zhu Kuang Lee,
See previous post of Abishek (SE54 is a short cut for the same action).
Regards,
John.

Similar Messages

Problem transporting table entries

Hi,
I need to transport my table entries frm development to test and production. However, even if i us standard recording routine in the table maintenance and then create entries ant transport, it doesnt work.
Also, is there an option to do it directly from SE11? Do i need admin rights?
Regards

Hi,
Table entries can be included in a transport request and can be transported .
For including the table entries in a request,Follow the below mentioned procedure.
Hi,
Table entries can be forcefully included in a transport request and can be transported to the required system.
For including the table entries in a request,Follow the below mentioned procedure.
but the data will be stored under workbench request
1.create a workbunch request in se01.
2.Double click on the request no.
3.Select the object tab in the new screen appeared.
4.Go for change mode (Ctrl+F1)
5.Select the Program id as R3TR and Object Type as TABU.
6.Give the Object name as Table name(ZTABLE)
7.Click on the function button on that row.
Give * in that editor appeared and save this.
Now all the table entries are binded in that request and can be transported across the server.
instead if you are putting on the user recordin on in TMG it will ask for a request each time you save some entries in the table.

How can I save the first dept. for an employee in a transport table?

Hi All,
I have created a table to store the transports to an employee from department to another department.
the first department number to every employee is stored at the parent table called employees.
when I insert a new record to the transports table (which is the child for the parent employees) for an employee and the manager agrees for this transport the original value of department number in employees table will be changed to the new one. I done this process through a db trigger on the transport table.
Now the problem is that the original value of the first department number will be lost cause of the db trigger that changes this value after manager agreement!
I looked to solve the problem by adding a new column in employees table to save the first dept. no. for each employee only if Count of records = 1 for that employee like this:
-- Before Update DB Trigger on Transports Table:
DECLARE
pragma autonomous_transaction;
N NUMBER;
BEGIN
SELECT count(EMP_SID) -- emp-sid is the FK referenced from employeess.emp_sid
INTO N
FROM TRANSPORT_TRANS
where emp_sid=:NEW.EMP_SID
GROUP BY EMP_SID;
     IF :NEW.AGREE_FLG = 1 AND N = 1 THEN -- If the manager agrees and this record is the first one for that employee
     UPDATE EMPLOYEESS E
     SET E.FST_AD=E.ADMINISTRATION_SID, -- E.ADMINISTRATION_SID has the oroginal value for admin no. and FST_AD is the new column to save the first value
            E.FST_HE=E.HEADQUARTERS_SID,
            E.ADMINISTRATION_SID = :OLD.ADMIN_SID, -- changing the value with then new one added on the table
            E.HEADQUARTERS_SID = :OLD.HEAD_SID
           WHERE E.EMP_SID = :OLD.EMP_SID;
     ELSIF :NEW.AGREE_FLG = 1 AND N != 1 THEN -- if the manager agrees but the record is not the first record for that employee
     UPDATE EMPLOYEESS E
        SET   E.ADMINISTRATION_SID = :OLD.ADMIN_SID, -- only change the original values
                 E.HEADQUARTERS_SID = :OLD.HEAD_SID
                 WHERE E.EMP_SID = :OLD.EMP_SID;
     END IF;
END;But the form gives me this error if I deleted (pragma autonomous_transaction;) st. :
ORA-04091: table transports is mutating, trigger/function may not see it
But when I keep it, the form gives me this error:
ORA-06519: active autonomous transaction detected and rolled back
Edited by: Dev. Musbah on Aug 18, 2009 2:09 AM

Dev. Musbah,
First make sure that the insert statement executes. And check whether other error messages are getting. Currently you are checking only NO_DATA_FOUND. so change the exception part with
EXCEPTION
     WHEN NO_DATA_FOUND THEN NULL;
     WHEN OTHERS THEN MESSAGE('Some Error Occured');Regards,
Manu.
If this answer is helpful or correct, please mark it. Thanks.

Transporting table entry with primary key 120 char

Hi all,
I have 2 separate questions which I feel are closely related.
In the url:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/cf/21eb6e446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
It says:....
<i>If the key length is greater than 120, there are restrictions when transporting table entries. The key can only be specified up to a maximum of 120 places in a transport. If the key is larger than 120, table entries must be transported generically.</i>
<b>How do I transport the table entries "generically" for such a table?</b>
To further illustrate my actual problem:
My problem in the real world lies with the MIMETYPES table, maintained in trx SMW0.
I select the mime types row by row and do a <u>Table Entry > Transport Entries,</u> but get an error that says
<i>"Key entry for table MIMETYPES may only be generic"</i>.
As a result it fails to attach to my transport.
(Note: the primary key of MIMETYPES is 128 chars long)
The Diagnosis long text says "<i>The key is longer than allowed by the Change and Transport System (120 characters</i>)."
The Procedure says:
<i>1. Make sure that you only specify the character fields before the
    first non-character key field. You must enter the key with a generic
    ending. Enter the generic symbol directly after the specified part
    of the key.
2. You must enter the generic symbol at the latest in the 120th
    character of the key.                                              </i>
<b>What is this generic symbol that i need to insert at the 120th position??</b>
Message was edited by:
        Kevin Wong
Message was edited by:
        Kevin Wong
Message was edited by:
        Kevin Wong

Thanks Nick!
So the mysterious "generic character" is actually the asterisk (*). It works.
Strange tho as the error long text says to insert the "generic character" at the 120th character position of the key, but I found that altho I can save it, the transport still fails with the same error.
I tried placing the * right after the key value e.g.
KEY123*
and it worked.
Thanks again!

Transport Table Maintainance

Hi,
I am currently working on merging two SAP systems. I was wondering what the best way is to transport table maintainance?
Thank you.
/Elvez

Hi Elvez,
This is very easy..
You will need to transport the function group of the table maintenance in a transport.
There are two ways:
1) You can transport the database table and this function group together and there will be no problem.
2) If you are transporting the function group in a separate transport, make sure that the transport for the database table is already moved.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Vikas Bittera.
**Points for useful answers**

Problem with table formatting

I'm having a lot of problems with tables not reflecting their formatting when I open them in a browser. I've tried opening in Safari, Firefox & Camino with the same results. For example, a row with the following html content has a much larger height & aligns the text to the top when opened in a browser:
<tr>
          <td height="15" colspan="3" valign="middle"><h6 align="center">Summer 2009</h6>
          </td>
        </tr>
If it matters, this is a row in a table nested in another table. Here's the code down to the row in question (all tags are closed properly in the remaining code):
<table width="600" border="2" align="center" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0">
    <tr>
      <td align="center" valign="top"><img src="images/events.jpg" width="250" height="35"></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td align="left" valign="top">
      <table width="100%" border="0" align="center" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
        <tr>
          <td height="15" colspan="3" valign="middle"><h6 align="center">Summer 2009</h6>
          </td>
        </tr>
I am using a style sheet for text. Here's the code for "h6" if that matters:
h6 {
font-family: Verdana, Geneva, Arial;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
color: #660099;
Any ideas is appreciated. This is driving me nuts. Spacing and alignment sometimes work and sometimes don't work. Dreamweaver is supposed to make such things easier!
Kevin

Header tags are usually used round a bit of text, not parts of a table, and if you don't specify the margins on them, can force different amounts of space below in different browsers. Try making the bottom margin on h6 zero, and confine it to text within a cell.
Also, if you can upload your page somewhere and let us have the url it will be easier to troubleshoot.

Problem in Table maintenance view

Hi all,
i am getting some problem in table maintenance view.
In my table i have some fields and when i created my table maintenance view , it is created , but when i try to see it in SM30 its not showing my fields and even i am unable to create a new entry. when i click
new entries its going back to the sm30 screen..
How to go abt it
please help me

Hello,
Have you created the table maintanence view the right way.
You can get good help from below link: [[http://www.****************/Tutorials/ABAP/TableMaintenance/demo.htm]]
Also, please check the Delivery Class and Data Browser/Table View Maint. in the Delivery and Maintanence tab of the table.
Thanks,
Jayant
Edited by: Jayant Sahu on Nov 24, 2008 3:00 PM

Problem with tables -- need help!

I am having problems with table formatting, when using
Preformatted text. The tables look fine in the WYSIWYG editor, but
have lots of extra space above and below the text when looking at
the output files.
I will attach the code from one of the HTML files from my
project, so you can see what I'm talking about.
Thanks.

Well, if you're talking about the single-celled table with
the line:
<p class=Preformatted>[assembly:
Ace.AceAssembly]</p>
</pre>
... you can eliminate the <P> tags. that will give you
one line less. Otherwise, your remaining space is the result of the
<PRE> tag. It, like the <XMP> tag, gives it one line of
space beneath as well.
Your alternative beyond that would be to, when needed, wrap
up the script in Javascript. That line, for instance, wouldn't need
it.

Transport table+data one server to another server

Hi expert,
i have 2 servers DEV1 & DEV 2 with ecc 6.0 oracle 10g.
Both server have same patch level and same version of OS,DB & Patch.
in DEV1 have a table which consist 54500 rows i want move to this table and data in DEV2 server.
Please suggest How can i do this if i create a transport or copies request it move only structure not data.
Regards,

Hi,
It is possible through SAP by creating transport request.
See the below link for how to:
Transporting Table entries from one server to another
[http://****************/Tips/Basis/Transport/TableEntries.htm|http://****************/Tips/Basis/Transport/TableEntries.htm]
Regards.
Rajesh Narkhede

What could be the problem with table REGUH

Hi exprts
i developed a report . its wrking ok in developemt system
but in Quality system ,
the below query is taking more time.
in quality even i have taken slection criteria which is very less than devlopment selection.
please tell me the below query is performance wise not good or
is there any problem with table REGUH in quality system?
IF NOT ( t_bsak_aux[] IS INITIAL ).
    SELECT laufd laufi xvorl zbukr lifnr rwbtr kunnr empfg"
           vblnr ausfd rzawe
      FROM reguh
      INTO TABLE t_reguh
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_bsak_aux
      WHERE laufd <> space
        AND laufi <> space
        AND zbukr = t_bsak_aux-bukrs
        AND lifnr = t_bsak_aux-lifnr
        AND vblnr = t_bsak_aux-augbl.
thanks in advance
regards
neeru

Hi,
Using SPACE against the keys (LAUFI, LAUFD - specifically LAUFD) will most likely return no results. LAUFD, being one of the keys and the date which the program is supposed to run (considering that this is settlement data - it has already run) - implies that this field will be populated. Putting " = SPACE" in your where clause is saying that you want to find records from the table where those fields are not populated. That is fine for LAUFI, considering it is the indicator for a proposal only. In my requirement, my client did not want to see proposals but only real payment runs - therefore, LAUFI = SPACE is correct.
The reason you are having poor performance while selecting form this table is because it is a cluster table like bseg. This thread explains a little bit of why cluster tables are a performance nightmare when trying to select - although it is about bseg, you will get the idea:
http://blogs.ittoolbox.com/sap/db2/archives/select-from-bsegrfblg-performance-problem-14247
I'm trying to find an alternative to get bank account information regarding payments - I will post a reply if I am lucky to find one!
Good luck

Transport Table with Data from Development to Quality

Hi
Requirement:
Transporting Table with Values from Development to Quality System.
I have a Z* - table, appended one field at the end.
I need to transport data along with the table structure from Development System to Quality System.
In Development System, I have assigned the Transport request in Client 100(We can't add data to the table in this client).
What needs to be done to migrate the new table structure with Values.
Thanks in Advance
Regards,
Baburaj
NOTE: the requirement is to transport table and table entries through a transport request.
There should not be any manual update for the table in the target System (Quality System).

Check the delivery class assigned to the table. Please see the documentation
Delivery class
    The delivery class controls the transport of table data when installing
    or upgrading, in a client copy and when transporting between customer
    systems. The delivery class is also used in the extended table
    maintenance.
    There are the following delivery classes:
    o   A: Application table (master and transaction data).
    o   C: Customer table, data is maintained by the customer only.
    o   L: Table for storing temporary data.
    o   G: Customer table, SAP may insert new data records, but may not
        overwrite or delete existing data records. The customer namespace
        must be defined in table TRESC. (Use Report RDDKOR54 here).
    o   E: System table with its own namespaces for customer entries. The
customer namespace must be defined in table TRESC. (Use Report
RDDKOR54 here.)
S: System table, data changes have the same status as program
changes.
W: System table (e.g. table of the development environment) whose
data is transported with its own transport objects (e.g. R3TR PROG,
R3TR TABL, etc.).
or during client copy
the data of client-specific tables is copied.
Classes C, G, E, S: The data records of the table are copied to the
target client.
Classes W, L: The data records of the table are not copied to the
target client.
Class A: Data records are only copied to the target client if
explicitly requested (parameter option). Normally it does not make
sense to transport such data, but is supported to permit you to copy
an entire client environment.
or during installation, upgrade and language import
behavior differs here for client-specific and cross-client tables.
nt-specific tables
Classes A and C: Data is only imported into client 000. Existing
data records are overwritten.
Classes E, S and W: Data is imported into all clients. Existing data
records are overwritten.
Class G: Existing data records are overwritten in client 000. In all
other clients, new data records are inserted, but existing data
records are not overwritten.
Class L: No data is imported.
Cross-client tables
o   Classes A, L and C: No data is imported.
o   Classes E, S, and W: Data is imported. Exisitng data records with
     the same key are overwritten.
o   Classe G: Data records that do not exist are inserted, but existing
     data records are not overwritten.
ehavior during transport between customer systems
Data records of tables of delivery class L are not imported into the
target system. Data records of tables of delivery classes A, C, E, G, S
and W are imported into the target system (this is done for the target
client specified in the transport for client-specific tables).
se of the delivery class in the extended table maintenance
The delivery class is also analyzed in the extended table maintenance
(SM30). The maintenance interface generated for a table makes the
following checks:
o   You cannot transport the entered data with the transport link of the
    generated maintenance interface for tables of delivery classes W and
    L.
o   When you enter data, there is a check if this data violates the
    namespace defined for the table in table TRESC. If the data violates
    the namespace, the input is rejected.
Thanks,

Problem with table maintenance allowed

hi,
here my problem is table is genarated and stored under local object that time i m creating function group is zabc. afterwards i m storing my table in my development class that time it is not possible to change function group in table maintenance genarator plz help me any one knows.
what is the exact use of table maintenance generator i m using this for ztables and i m going to screen painter i m adjesting the fields.what is the exact use of it.

Hi,
1) You may delete the function group assignment and re-assign another one in change mode
2) The use of table maintenance generator is to provide users with a screen to maintain data in the table. If the data is not going to be populated by any users then there is no need for it. Transactions will automatically populate the data in the background
3) One can access the maintenance screen by going to SM30 or can assign your own transaction code to access it
Hope it helps.
Raj
Reward points if helpful

Problems in table bindings

Hell All
I have some problems in table data binding. I created JSF portlet that consists of two pages and I added a table in each page and created two java classes that extend ObjectListDataProvider and provide Data for the tables. the problem is that when I nagivate from the second page to the first one, the table on first page is not displayed correctly, in fact the table on first page displays objects of the second table's data provider, if I refresh the page "by clicking a button that does nothing for example" the table on first page displays its content correctly.
this problem is happening on Liferay portal running on tomcat 5.5.
can any one help slove this problem ?
thankx

* bump *

Problem with Table Access Full

Hi,
Please help me how to resolve the problem of table access full, when i am executing query i facing a problem with these. all though i have create index on these is queru but execution time taking too late.
Also please help if there any syntax to run faster execution.
Thanks in Advance
Sreenivas

Hi,
Please try to analyze your tables once with DBA's help.
If the above does not work, try to use hints which will force use the index created on the column.
Do not use any conversion functions on that column, in the where clause while checking any condition.
If you are storing numbers in a character column, try to have the conditional value as character value in where clause instead of number type.
Thanks and Regards,
Sridhar.

Problem with table MBEWH

Hello SAP experts , im having a little problem with table MBEWH because the data i whant to extract isnt the correct one, i saw that this table stores all the prices for the materials and it groups them by year and by month but when i check to see what was the price for a specific material the price i had on that time periord inst the same as the one on the system, also i manage my material with baches and when i check to see if that batch was in that period of time it isnt so im really confused as to how the system saves the historical data on this table, thank you in advanced.
kind regards

read OSS note 193554 , it explains everything

Problem transporting table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for