Problem with Cenvat clearing Accounting Entries on invoice

Dear Guru's
   my Scene is , i am doing  MIRO  gainst PO  ,  when i stimulate the document  All general Accounting entries are there Except  ,  cenevat  Entries , (BED , ES , HES )  ,  
i did part 1 in MIGO  & , post Cenevat in  J1IEX  ,,    there i found , when i am taking key Capture Excise Invoice (J1IEX) & in that , there is post button if  I am clicking that button  , Cenavat is posting (10.3%)  ,
but when i am taking   capture  frist & then i  post it in posting key of J1IEX ,  system is showing Error message  that 
No Part I exists for availing credit in excise invoice 555 2011
     Message no. 4F112   , 
So please tell me how should i proceed  , will be very help full for me
     Thanks & Regards
   Akshay
Edited by: Jeyakanthan A on Feb 10, 2012 3:12 PM

Hi,
No Part I exists for availing credit in excise invoice 609 2011
Message no. 4F112
which refernce you are using you should used MIGO
609 is i think vendor excise number for you
and check in J1IEX you are getting part1 entry there or not for MIGO docuement
second dispay 609 entry in J1IEX and check statsu of this entry
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Similar Messages

  • ERROR IN MIRO POSTING ENTRIES WITH CENVAT CLEARING ACCOUNT

    Hi,
              I'm facing a problem while posting in MIRO, instead of CENVAT clearing account RG23A BED acocount is getting debited, here I'm giving you the screen shots for MIGO and MIRO accounting entries please assist me with some customizing tips.
       MIGO
       MIRO
    material : TEST MAT
    vendor   : LAKSHMI GROUP
    I've assigned 154001 G/L ac for RG23A BED and 191101 G/L for MODVAT clearing ac.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Sairam.

    Hi Shiva,
          thanks for your response as you said in std cenvat ac get debited but as you can see in that above screen shots of my accounting entries RG23ABED ac is getting debited what actually wrong. How can correct the wrong entries please suggest me some solution here I'm sharing the screen shot of Tax on Goods Movements-->Account Determination-->Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
    please ask me for more information if you don't get my point on this problem
    Thanks in advance,
    Sairam

  • Cenvat clearing account is not cleared while posting AP invoice.

    Hi experts
    If the tax code involves the Excise duty 100% non deductible, then the cenvat clearing account is not getting closed properly. please refer the below attachment and help me to solve this issue.
    1.while posting GRPO
    2. Incoming excise Invoice
    3.AP invoice

    hi
    I am wonder that still i did not get any reply or work around or suggestion from anyone of SAP experts for the above issue.

  • How to clear cenvat clearing account automatically

    Hi all
    will any one help me in making me understand as to how the cenvat clearing account can be automatically cleared.
    What exactly i mean is -
    When we do MIGO, the cenat clearing account is automatcially credited  and RG 23 A is debited.and
    When we do MIRO, the cenvat clearing account is automatically debited and vendor is credited.
    if this is the case, i find that the cenvat clearing account which is getting credited in MIGO and debited in MIRO is still showing as OPEN ITEMS when i view the cenvat clearing general ledger account in transaction code - FBL3N .
    How should i make the Cenvat clearing account to automatically get cleared and should show the line items cleared automatically, with out going through the t code f.13 etc.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Rishikesh

    Hello
    Check if this is of help.
    Also check MM/FI integration for 23 transactions. Check if a/c assignment is set.
    CENVAT Document
    Definition
    An accounting document that the system automatically creates when it generates a Part II entry.
    Use
    Customizing
    Specify which document type you want the CENVAT documents to use, in Customizing for Logistics – General, by choosing Taxes on Goods Movements ® India ® Basic Settings ® Maintain Company Code Settings.
    Day-to-Day Activities
    When the system generates a Part II entry for an incoming excise invoice, it creates a CENVAT document to debit the excise duty to the excise duty account, and credit it to the CENVAT clearing account:
    The excise duty is cleared from the clearing account when the accounting clerk enters the vendor invoice.
    When the system generates a Part II entry for an outgoing excise invoice, it creates a CENVAT document to debit the excise duty to the excise duty account, and credit it to the CENVAT suspense account:
    Reg
    assign points if useul

  • Automatic clearing of cenvat clearing account

    Hi all,
    While clearing cenvat clearing account thru F.13 it is not clearing.
    we have maintained cenvat clearing G/L with sort key-014
    in OB74 ZUONR is maintained.
    in IMG-Logistics - General-Tax on Goods Movements-India-Account Determination-Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    also the cenvat clearing a/c is maimtained as offsetting a/c.
    Then why it is not clearing.
    Thanks
    shivaji

    Hi Sivasankar,
    Can you be brief on "Have your ABAPer and set Substitution user exist which populate PO number in assignment field at the time of MIRO".
    Which "Substitution user exist" we has to ask the ABAPer to use, can you help us by giving the User Exit details or let us the process which we can explain to our ABAPer's to understand. 
    I am also facing the same problem from long time and i also posted the same, but i didn't get any reply from the Form. Because my client not cleared this CENVAT Clearing account from April 2009.
    Regards,
    R.K

  • Problem with Excise Duty tax calcualtion in Invoice

    Hi experts,
    Need your rexpert advise on the below issue.
    We have MM invoice where by the tax is not calucalted correctly.
    The Material is subject to excise duty, on the GR the excise invoice is getting generated with Cenvat clering account with correct amount towards excise duty
    i.e. GR is done for amount - 52951.33 and corresponding Tax code is KE(10% excise duty, 3% Ecess and 2% CST) which comes correctly as 6214.73 approximately which is correct in case of GR
    But however when the Invoice is posted for corresponding GR, the amount of tax calculated is only 1307.50, which should have been 6214.73 as the amount on the GR.
    We really are not able to find out why their is diffrences in the calculation of excise duty.
    Request your expert advise on this regard.
    Thanks.
    Shahid.

    System will fetch the duties from J_1IGRXREF table into MIRO transaction. So firstly check whether duties are correctly updated for the respective Excise invoice in the said table.
    Secondly ensure you have selected the correct tax code in MIRO same as PO tax code. There may be a chance that user had changed the tax code after posting the GRN in the Purchase order.
    Finally check whether the condition records are valid for the selected tax code in FV13 transaction code and are not set to deleted.

  • Is it possible to have plant wise CENVAT clearing accounts?

    All SAP gurus,
    Is it possible to have plant wise CENVAT clearing accounts?
    (all the plants are in single one company code).

    Hi
    I am just simulating exactly same reqt in sandbox.I am maintaining  values in SM31 table view -J_1IT030K_V, for FR4 transaction.
    I have seperate taxcodes plantwise and the plants are assigned to business places correctly.
    Now I am testing in MIRO, the GL account for condition type JCV1 with FR4 account key..but I am not getting the GL as given in SM31 but the GL given in obyc-FR4 key.
    Can you please help to clarify why I am not getting this GL assignment?
    Regards
    Ramesh.B.

  • Problems with cache.clear()

    Hello!
    We are having some problems with cache clears in our production cluster that we do once a day. Sometimes heaps "explode" with a lot of outgoing messages when we do a cache.clear() and the entire cluster starts failing.
    We had some success with a alternate method of doing the cache clear where we iterate cache.keySet() and do a cache.remove(key) with a pausetime of 100 ms after 20000 objects until the cache is empty. But today nodes started failing on a cache.size() before the removes started (the first thing we do is to log the size of the cache we are about to clear before the remove operations start).
    We have multiple distributed caches configured with a near cache. The nearcache has 10k objects as high units and the back caches vary in size, the largest is around 300k / node.
    In total the DistributedCache-service is handling ~20 caches.
    The cluster consists of 18 storage enabled nodes spread across 6 servers and 31 non storage enabled nodes running on 31 servers.
    The invalidation stategy on the near caches is ALL (or, its AUTO but it looks like it selects ALL since ListenerFilterCount=29 and ListenerKeyCount=0 on a StorageManager?)
    Parition count is 257, backup count 1, no changes in thread count on the service, service is DistributedCache.
    Coherence version 3.6.1.0.
    A udp test sending from one node to another displays 60 megabyte/s.
    Heapsize for the Coherence JVMs, 3gb. LargePages is used.
    Heapsize for the front nodes JVMs, 6gb. LargePages is used.
    No long GC-times (until the heaps explode), 0.2-0.6 seconds. CMS-collector.
    JDK 1.6 u21 64-bit.
    Windows 2k8R2.
    We are also running CoherenceWeb and some Read/Write-caches, but on different coherence services. We are not doing any clear/size-operations against caches owed by these services.
    Looking at some metrics from the last time we had this problem (where we crashed on cache.size()).
    The number of messages sent by the backing nodes went from <100/s to 20k-50k/s in 15 s.
    The number of messages resent by the backing nodes went from ~0/s to 1k-50k/s depending on the node in 15 s.
    At the time the total number of requests against the DistributedCache-service was around 6-8/s and node.
    To my questions, should it be a problem to do a cache clear with this setup (where the largest cache is around 5.4 million entires) ? Should it be a problem to do a cache.size()?
    What is the nicest way to do a cache.clear()? Any other strategy?
    Could a lock on a entry in the cache cause this problem? Should it really cause a problem with cache.size()?
    Any advice?
    BR,
    Carl
    Edited by: carl_abramsson on 2011-nov-14 06:16

    Hi Charlie,
    Thank you for your answer! Yes, actually we are using a lot of expiry and many of the items are created at roughly the same time! We haven't configured expiry in the cache configuration, instead we do a put with a expire.
    Regarding the workload, compared to our peak hours it has been very low when had problems with the size and clear operations. So the backing tier isn't really doing much at the time. That's what has been so strange with this problem.
    The release going live today has PRESENT as near cache invalidation strategy. We remove as much of the expire as possible in the next.
    BR,
    Carl

  • Had problem with my hotmail account and had to change my password. Ever since then, my default e-mail account set up to hotmail doesn't work...it sends from gmail. How can I correct that?

    Had problem with my hotmail account and had to change my password. Ever since then, my default e-mail account set up to hotmail doesn't work...it sends from gmail. How can I correct that?

    On your iPhone you need to change your password in 2 places:
    - Incoming Mail Server and
    - Outgoing Mail Server
    To get to the password entry for the Outgoing Mail Server you have to tap on cell smtp.live.com and again on the second view.

  • Cenvat clearing account is not coming in MIRO for Basic excise

    Dear sir,
    I have created the PO  . After that  i did GR for same at that I capture excise invocie& post it.
    Accounting document is created for the same
    here is accounting enrtry
            cenvat Basic = 100 debit
            cenvat edu cess = 2 debit
           Cenvat Higher Ecess =1 debit.
       Cenvat clearing account = 103 credit
    when i go the miro
    after simulating in miro i found
    cenvat clearing account = 2 debit
    but it should be 103 debit
    why this is coming please help me...

    Hi,
    Generally it happens if CENVAT Clearing Account in not assigned in OB40 to the Tax Account Keys. But, as per you it has been maintained. So the following if you are using Tax Procedure TAXINN;
    SPRO > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Basic Settings > Determination of Excise Duty > Condition-Based Excise Determination > Classify Condition Types

  • I got a problem with my personal account data how can i recovery my icloud id information back i can't remember even my birthday pls help me

    I got a problem with my personal account data how can i recovery my icloud id information back i can't remember even my birthday pls help me how to recovery my id information back

    Did you follow all of the instructions provided in the article that you linked from? If not, you must follow each and every step.
    If you have, then all you can do is contact iTunes Support:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5699?viewlocale=en_US
    or by email: https://ssl.apple.com/emea/support/itunes/contact.html
    Cheers,
    GB

  • Problem with reversal of Service entry Sheet

    Hi All,
    I am facing a problem with reversal of service entry sheet. The user has posted the document in dec 2009 and now the user wants to reverse the doc. I told the process how to reverse it. But when she is trying to revoke the acceptance, she is getting error log.I told her to reset the posting date to present date.Now she tried to change the doc date but she is getting error as "604 item 010 WBS element ****** budget exceeded year 2009". So i advised her further to increase the budget in the year 2009. Even that solution is not working.
    Please help in this regard
    Thanks & Regards
    Nisha Prasad

    Hi,
    The user is not authorised to change the budget. The person resposible for this is telling that increasing the budget wont help. can you tell me how to view whether the budget is available for the system in the period or not? Can you please help me in this regard?
    Thanks
    Nisha

  • HT1694 I'm having a lot of problems with the hotmail account, regularly is indicating an error in the server, that I have to introduce the password again that late that this is wrong. I have changed the password making this shorter but it does not work.

    I'm having a lot of problems with the hotmail account, regularly is indicating an error in the server, that I have to introduce the password again that late that this is wrong. I have changed the password making this shorter but it does not work.

    bump? Is bumping allowed? Lol.
    I just really need some help here.

  • Accounting Entries when Invoice Verification takes place before GR

    Hello All,
    I have some difficulty in understanding the accounting entries when Invoice Verification takes place before Goods Receipt.
    The scenario is as below: - (It is taken from one of the SAP documentation - AC530 - Actual Costing & Material Ledger- pg.No.2-8)
    1) Stock of material available u2013 50 units / Value Rs.125 /Moving average price in the material master Rs.2.50 per unit
    2) Invoice receipt takes place before goods receipt u2013 100 pc @ Rs.4.00 pc
    3) System does internal stock coverage check. As per SAP document, the stock shortage is 50 pieces.
    4) So the price difference arise i.e.Rs.100 (How this amount is arrived at? u2013 Not understood)
    5) The price difference of Rs.100 is only partially debited to the material (Rs.50). The rest is posted to price difference account (Rs.50)
    The accounting entry u2013
    GRIR A/c Dr                      300
    Inventory A/c Dr.                 50
    Price Diff. A/c Dr.                50
    To Vendor A/c                   400
    Question u2013
    -     I have not understood how Rs.100 is calculated & on what Moving average price the calculation takes place.
    -     As per the calculation in the document, the moving average price of the opening stock is Rs.2.50.the stock is 50  units. (50*2.50=125)
    -     The Invoice receipt happens at 100 pcs @ Rs.4.00 (100*4=400)
    -     So the new moving average price will be Rs.3.50 (Rs.125 + {100*4=400})=Rs.525. Rs.525/(100+50)pcs = Rs.3.50
    -     So how the price difference & posting to Stock account is calculated in the accounting entry?
    Please help,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Gov

    Hi,
    Check below mentioned thread to understand posting to price difference account..
    Logic of price difference  posting
    you missed one aspect of this and that is PO qty and PO price.
    GR/IR will get debit at IR Qty * PO Price.
    rest all calculations are in the link provided..
    - So the new moving average price will be Rs.3.50 (Rs.125 + {100*4=400})=Rs.525. Rs.525/(100+50)pcs = Rs.3.50
    Moving avg. will be calculated on stock value / qty in stock. new MAP will be stock value = (125 +50) = 175 and stock qty = 50 units so MAP will be 175/50 = 3.5.
    Since, GRN has not been done yet stock value (100*4) will not be there..
    Regards,
    Sayujya

  • Problem with field GL Account is that it shows concatenated Chart of Accoun

    Hello . Please help me. We have sap BI olap universe . problem with field GL Account is that it shows concatenated Chart of Accounts. But user want to trim the chart of account and show only account in list of values in webi report.
    So What code I can put in Universe to remove this " 9000/" WHICH IS Chart of acct from GL Account
    example List of values shows
    9000/99030
    9000/99070
    I want to show as below
    99030
    99070
    I tried replace function in universe it does not work. Pls help.
    Thanks
    soniya

    Hi,
    You can do it in Web Intelligence using the function Right().
    Depending on the SAP BW version you have it is possible to build such calculated expression in universe on uniquename or name:
    <EXPRESSION>RIGHT[0CALMONTH].currentmember.uniquename,5)</EXPRESSION>
    OR
    <EXPRESSION>RIGHT([0CALMONTH].currentmember.name,5)</EXPRESSION>
    You have to replace 0CALMONTH by the unique definition of GL Accounts and you also need to use the object referencing GL Accounts in your query in addtion to the calculated expression.
    Regatds
    Didier

Maybe you are looking for

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 10275: Beta 2 bug fix.

    Revision: 10275 Author:   [email protected] Date:     2009-09-15 12:13:55 -0700 (Tue, 15 Sep 2009) Log Message: Beta 2 bug fix. Remove styleProxy from SkinnableTextBase, and replace with pushing padding styles from the skin into the textDisplay. QE n

  • How can I install a flash player download on a mac pro?

    At the prompt of the computer that I have 1 download flash player. I downloaded click on it 2 time ask me to enter my password didn't work. when on adobe change a new password try to install again ask for the password enter the new password, BUT, it

  • CUP 5.3 SP9 Forwarded requests not moving to next stage

    CUP 5.3 sp9 - The administrator forwarded a request (first stage mgr approval) to another person (the forward return box was checked).  The person that the request was forwarded to got the message (no content in the email, just a link) and was able t

  • What should i do with this 5GHz setting?

    right now it is left un-selected (by default) and the macbook pro, iphone and ipads are all connecting to the wi-fi network. would this improve in any way if this is selected? by the way, i am not in any of the countries in the drop down list ... wou

  • SSO OBIEE11g

    Hi, have someone configurated the SSO in OBIEE11g (11.1.5) with Windows Active Directory (Windows Server 2008 R2 64bit)? I'm tryng to configurate the system but I receive always the same error: Error 401--Unauthorized From RFC 2068 Hypertext Transfer