Problem with Http RFC Scenario

hi all.........
Am doing an HTTP RFC scenario. The scenario is working fine with all messages in IS, IE and AE being successful. But the problem is the RFC response am getting is not what is expected. When i run the RFC directly with the same input value I get the correct response. Can anybody figure out what is the problem. In the channel (adapter monitoring) what comes is :
"RFC_HISTORY
- Error: 2007-01-16 09:47:52 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: failed to parse BAPI response due to: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.util.bapi.BapiException: Parameter with name RETURN not found.
- Error: 2007-01-15 19:57:21 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: error while processing message to remote system:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.client.RfcClientException: failed to parse BAPI response due to: com.sap.aii.af.rfc.util.bapi.BapiException: Parameter with name RETURN not found.
- OK: 2007-01-15 19:28:31 IST: Message processed for interface ZBAPI_NETWORK_CONF_ADD "
thanks in advannce

Hi,
><i>I ve used RFC itself as message type for http by importing it into external definition. So since both structures are same i omitted both MM and IM</i>
Should work fine. Can you look into SXMB_MONI and check what the response is? Make sure that the request message is also as expected.
Regards
Bhavesh

Similar Messages

Synchronous HTTP - RFC Scenario: Timeout

Hello together,
I have just implemented a synchronous HTTP --> RFC scenario. When I test the implementation using the HTTP testing tool within the Runtime Workbench everything works fine.
However when I use an external HTTP Client I get a timeout exception. This is also raised in the XI Message Monitoring: "Timeout condition of pipeline reached"
Do you know any reason for this?
Thank you very much.

Hello,
this problem is solved now. It was a problem with the HTTP Client, obviously because a wrong queueID was automatically inserted in the URL.

HTTP---RFC Scenario

Hi All,
I have Done HTTP--RFC Scenario and i got the Bellow Error in Receiver RFC CC
Receiver channel 'CC_POS_CashJournal_IB' for party '', service 'Sub_ssd_subdev'
Error can not instantiate RfcPool caused by:
com.sap.aii.af.rfc.RfcAdapterException: error initializing RfcClientPool:com.sap.aii.af.rfc.core.repository.RfcRepositoryException: can not connect to destination system due to: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: (102) RFC_ERROR_COMMUNICATION: Connect to SAP gateway failed
Connect_PM TYPE=A ASHOST=10.1.1.203 SYSNR=00 GWHOST=10.1.1.203 GWSERV=sapgw00 PCS=1
LOCATION CPIC (TCP/IP) on local host with Unicode
ERROR partner '10.1.1.203:sapgw00' not reached
TIME Fri May 2 18:55:26 2008
RELEASE 700
COMPONENT NI (network interface)
VERSION 38
RC -10
MODULE nibuf.cpp
LINE 4601
DETAIL NiBufIConnect: connection pending after 60000ms
SYSTEM CALL connect
ERRNO 150
ERRNO TEXT Operation now in progress
COUNTER 2
Line 1 / 1
Regards
Suman

Hi,
Do we need to check and use RFC Meta data Repository in RFC CC???
Here I used the Business System for RFC Receiver that is configured for IDOC Scenario.
Is this is Fine and Ok???
Regards
Suman

Mapping Issue(UDF) in HTTP-RFC scenario with URL parameters - Urgent

Hi All,
I am working out an HTTP-RFC scenarion wherein there is no xml data to be pushed.
The data will be coming in the url parameters.
Also we'll exposing our url(created by SAP PI) to 3rd party system to push data in terms of url parameters.
So how do I do mapping? Also what UDF code will contain?
Since I'm working on this kind of scenario for the first time, I need every help from you guys.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Patil

Hi All,
I have worked on RFC to HTTP scenario wherein URL have to be passed. I used UDF in d same.
But now the case is reverse, how shall I move ahead with what source message type(in the mapping) and how to do mapping.
What kind of UDF will be useful here?
I am completely blank in this kind of scenario where 3rd party system is going to pass four parameters on URL link craeted by us since its an HTTP to RFC scenario.
Please guys help me! Give me some inputs.
Thanks,
Amit Patil

Problem with File-RFC..

Hello friends,
I am doing File - RFC scenario.
When I send data from XI, its going fine but the records are not created in RFC
when I try to create records with test data in SE37, its able to create records
Where could the things be wrong?
why were the records not created?
file is picked, receiver side CC is green, checkered flag
no inbound or outbound queues in XI
if the data is being accepted by the RFC, then it would have created records in RFC, i guess there is some problem in accepting the data sent by Xi and processing it as records of RFC
coz with test data, the RFC is working gud
There are no items in the Queue on the R3 side.
please help on how to check where do I have to check if the data is coming in or not or how to trace it?
stuck with it since last 4 days
help !!!!

hi nikhil,
you should try to put an infinite loop on your RFC function, something like:
data a.
while a eq space. endwhile.
Then from SM50 you should be able to see if the FM has been called; if so, you should see the 'blocked' process and be able to debug it.
If not, then XI is not calling properly the FM; you should check your receiver agreement and, eventually, if there something wrong with the alignment in CPA cache(both from the Integration Directory and SXI_CACHE transaction)
Regards,
Paolo

HTTP RFC scenario doubt

I have created http to RFC scenario in XI
Previously this interface was using Business Connector and following XML message was used.
<? xml version="1.0"?>
<TAC>
     u2026.
     u2026.
     u2026.
     u2026.
</TAC>
Based on it I have created data type and message type in XI and created interface and following is my incoming XML message.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<ns0:MT_TAC xmlns:ns0="urn://Website/CreateServiceOrder">
   <TAC>
     u2026.
     u2026.
     u2026.
     u2026.
   </TAC>
</ns0:MT_TAC>
So u201C<ns0:MT_TAC xmlns:ns0="urn://Website/CreateServiceOrder">   </ns0:MT_TAC> are the extra tags
Is it required to send these additional tags in the incoming XML Message?
I hope you have got the question.
Thanks,
Vishal

>
Kai Lerch-Baier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the tags <ns0:MT_TAC xmlns:ns0="urn://Website/CreateServiceOrder"> </ns0:MT_TAC> are not basically required. This depends on your message definition. check your XSD / DTD you used to define the message structure in IR. Also you can use a XSLT mapping to remove the tags if not needed.
>
> Reagrds,
> Kai
i think these are the start and end tags of the MT in IR.....so if i remove them wont i get an error??....how will the incoming payload go into the MT if the structure is different??
What can be done is create the DT/MT with TAC as name and not MT_TAC.....make a note that it is not according to the naming convention....

Problem with HTTP load balancing

Hello Experts
I have a problem when i do loadbalancing for links like http://1.1.1.1/site/home where 1.1.1.1 is the VIP address (i got http not found), while it is working fine when the link is http://1.1.1.1,
the link is working fine on the real servers for example when i try http://2.2.2.2/site/home it works
by the way, im not doing URL loadbalancing,
any ideas
Thank you in advance

It is generally good idea for this type of cases to get a sniffer trace (in ACE module span 10G backplane interface from supervisor or if ACE appliance take parallel span session of client and server vlan).
This case was investigated in TAC SR and this is a small summary of the traces that may help other users hitting this issue (usually it is good idea to filter by http and client IP) :
This is what we have seen for the non-working scenario.
Packet 1: Client sends HTTP GET to ACE VIP
Packet 2: ACE forwards HTTP GET to RSERVER
Packet 3: RSERVER answers ACE with HTTP 404
Packet 4: ACE forwards the real server response (HTTP 404) to the client
ACE was not changing anything in the packets that were being loadbalanced. And the HTTP 404 error sent from the server that ACE was forwarding indicates that the Web server thinks that the HTTP data stream sent by the client was correct, but simply can not provide the access to the resource specifief by URL.
Bottom line it was found that in this case the server behaves in a different way based on the hostname used to connect to the application, and this should be addressed on the application/server side. An easy way to check this is by using the server name pointing to the vip in local client hostfile.

Discovery System: Problems with exposing RFC as web service

We have a version 2 discovery system and have successfully implemented the three exercises from the TechEd workshop (Sales Order Distribution, Creating a PO Store Record WS, Adding a New Step to the Procurement Scenario with SAP CAF GP). It seems to work fine except for two issues with the RFC/WS:
1) The RFC, and therefore the WS, always returns an empty string instead of the 'X' that the documentation shows in Step 4.h. We checked the RFC itself and it looks like it has an error with the price field; it always appends a blank to the end of the price string and then errors.
2) The created web service does not show up on the Web Services Navigator page. Since the instructions tell you to save the URL to the WSDL, we can find the web service and test it, but you cannot find it on the Navigator page.
Neither of these problems are huge, but they make me worry that something is not quite right in the Discovery System and we may end up with larger problems later. Any ideas what could cause these two problems, and how to fix them?
Thanks, Eric
Message was edited by:
ERIC HAMER

Hi Eric,
First of all let me assure you that your system is perfectly fine and both topics that you have raised are the way the system is suppose to respond.
1. The reason that the service is returning a null is because you are entering the same input parameters more than once. Since some of the parameters are used as primary key's in the database, you will need to change them in order to successfully store the data.
2. The reason that you don't see the service in the Navigator page is because this service resides in the ERP and not in WebAS. Only services deployed on the WebAS will appear in the Web Service Navigator page.
Thanks,
Itai

Strange behaviour with HTTP RFC Connection

Hi Experts,
today I investigated a strange behaviour in our SAP environment. I tried to create a HTTP RFC connection (SM59) from our integration server to a locale integration engine in our test environment.
http:<server>:<port>/sap/xi/engine?type=entry
A few days ago I do the same for the development environment and all works fine.
For test purposes I used my user for the connection but when I tried to test the connection (test button) the authentification fails. After a few attempts my user was locked on the target server. (I called a admin to unlock my user).
My first idea was that there is problem with the URL or something in this way. So I do a test within the browser and type in my user again. The result was - as aspect - a soap message that an empty message can not be processed.
My second idea was that there are troubles with the authorization so I used a system user for the connection. I test the connection and received a message that the user has not enough rights to send messages to the locale integration server.
So I came to the result that I mistyped my password due the first attempt. I try again and I was really very carefully by typing my password. I press the test button and it fails with the message that I could not logged on to the system. I try it many times and it always fails.
Finally I use the system user and attach the required roles to the user.
But has anybody an idea why it was not possible to use my user? I really don't understand it since it works fine in the development environment.
Björn

what is the version of SAP system in dev and test environments.......
Some older version SAP systems(4.6 version) require passwords in CAPITALs....
Edited by: Praveen Gujjeti on Mar 17, 2009 5:05 PM

Problem with https internet url for Portal

Hello ,
We are running EP 7 SP 13.
We had a problem with the j2ee engine going down due to a db problem .It is ok now and and j2ee is up and running fine and the portal is accessible from the intranet.
But there is a problem with the https url that we use for internet access. It gives "page cannot be displayed error".
There is a IISproxy in place for internet access.Https certificate has not expired. Couldnt find much in the portal logs and trace or am I looking in the wrong place?
Any help would be most appreciated.
Rgds

Hi Vineeth
Check the IIS settings, , they might not have started properly.
EP5: Enabling SSL and renewing the J2EE certificate
SAP Note Number: 685306
Can you check the contents of Keystore in Visual admin,
Regards
Kaleem
Edited by: Kaleem on Aug 19, 2008 2:11 PM

InDesign problem With Https cURL Seems Very Slow at first time to handshaking to server

I am trying to connect the server using cURL from Indesign, but when i am trying to call to server the indesign takes so much time to open and initialize the socket it takes 25 seconds at first time only, but On all subsequent calls it is fast,
*but when i am tryid that same programe with an c++ empty project it is very fast in 2 second we get a result back,
*So the Problem With Indesign Socket initialization using https at first time because i have tryid same Curl On Simple c++ program and it is fast at all calls
Specification:
I am Currently using
     Indesign cs7 version 9.0
     visual studio 2010
Can Anyone tell me why It happens,
my code snippet is as follows please try to find if anyone knows better.
         curl_global_init(CURL_GLOBAL_ALL);
          curl = curl_easy_init();
         struct data config;
      config.trace_ascii = 1; /* enable ascii tracing */
      struct curl_slist *chunk = NULL;
         curl_slist_append( chunk, "Content-Type: application/json");
      curl = curl_easy_init();
      struct AppMemoryStruct chunk1;
         chunk1.memory = (char *)malloc(1); /* will be grown as needed by the realloc above */
         chunk1.size = 0;    /* no data at this point */
       if(curl) {
             curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_URL, url.GetPlatformString().c_str());
             curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_SSLCERTTYPE,"PEM");
             curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_SSLCERT, "C:\\test\\omg.aps.net.pem");
             curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYPEER, FALSE);
          curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_SSL_VERIFYHOST, 2);
             curl_easy_setopt(curl,CURLOPT_KEYPASSWD,"");
             char error[1024];
             curl_easy_setopt ( curl, CURLOPT_ERRORBUFFER, error );
       /* send all data to this function */
             curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_WRITEFUNCTION, &AppWriteMemoryCallback);
      /* we pass our 'chunk' struct to the callback function */
             curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_WRITEDATA, (void *)&chunk1);
      /* some servers don't like requests that are made without a user-agent
          field, so we provide one */
             //curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_USERAGENT, "libcurl-agent/1.0");
             //curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER, chunk);
             //curl_easy_setopt(curl, CURLOPT_HTTPGET,1);
     //heres the performance get down its around 25 seconds when i am calling The server Using Curl Object Having
     //https url
          res = curl_easy_perform(curl);
    // till here
             if(CURLE_OK != res)
                 errorCode = kFalse;
                 if(chunk1.memory)
                     free(chunk1.memory);
                  curl_easy_cleanup(curl);
               return errorCode;
             errorCode = kTrue;
             if(chunk1.memory)
                 returndata.SetCString(chunk1.memory);
                 free(chunk1.memory);
           /* always cleanup */
         curl_easy_cleanup(curl);curl_global_init(CURL_GLOBAL_ALL);
      please try to find a key issue why the performance is very bad using https.
Thanks,

I was tempted to move this over to the InDesign SDK forum where there are coders, but there isn't a lot of traffic over there, so I'm going to leave this open here with the advice that you probably won't get an answer from anyone here becasue we are, for the most part, not folks who work with code beyond scripting (and very few scripters hang out here, either).
You should cross-post over there yourself and hope someone who understnds the qusetion sees it in one place or the other.

Sneak Preview ABAP 2004s: Problem with HTTP-Server

Hi..
I have just installed the sneak preview.
Everything works well.
But there is a problem with the webdynpro
for abap. When i try to start the example
i become a message: "Windows can not find
://:/sap/bc/webdynpro/sap/wdt_quiz ....... "
This error is from the HTTP options.
In transaction SMMS over extert functiuns->http->display
the parameter http_status_code is -1.
Can anyone help me what i can do?

when you go into transaction SMICM->go to ->services you should atleast see one entry for HTTP
it will be something like below.
No. Protocol Service Name/Port Host Name Keep Alive Acti External Bind
1 HTTP 1081 xxxx.domain.com 30
i dont think that for this reason , you have to go for a reinstall, i am sure some config is missing.
Regards
Raja

Problem with Adaptive RFC Model.

Hi.
I have a problem with creating an Adaptive RFC Model.
When i choose a function from function list, that appears, and click next, the model wizard display log information with following text:
<b>[Warning]: Creating a connection with Metamodel language <en> failed. Continuing with language <ru>
[Fatal]: com.sap.mw.jco.JCO$Exception: Missing R3NAME=... or ASHOST=... in connect_param in RfcOpenEx
[Info]: .................</b>
The SLD server and SLD bridge is running.
How this can be fixed?
Thank you.

Hi
Open SAPLogon. Select the server profile say "Dev" and click on groups. In the window that appears enter the 3 letter id as System id. This you would get when you logon to SAP and see the right hand bottom corner. It would be a 3 letter "XXX". If not ask your basis administrator.
In the Message server space enter the Hostname or ip address (try both in case one of them doesnt work) of your R/3 server. Click on Generate List. You should get some groups appearing in the view below.
If it works then your message server is working fine. Let me know if that helps you.
regards
ravi

Problems with http header "Content-Location"

Does anyone know how to override the
"Content-Location" http header. We are having issues with search engines and this header being returned from Apache/oc4j. In a nutshell, I have a site that uses the
Struts framework, where the actual urls submitted would be for example
(http://mysite/home.do), where ".do" is just a servlet mapping. When we have
tried to follow the one link that has been spidered, it actually contains
the full path that appears in the "Content-Location" header (i.e.
http://mysite/web-inf/jsps/bogus.jsp) which in this case can't even be
accessed. The feedback we get from third-party utilities that try to spider
the site is that it is stopping because it has already indexed "bogus.jsp",
which in reality will always appear since it is a template, where the actual
urls will be different as is above.
Because the "Content-Location" header is being returned to any
client hitting the site, search engine spiders stop indexing at the first page because the value in "Content-Location" is the same.
Solutions tried:
mod_headers in Apache - have tried "Header unset"
HttpServletResponse.setHeader()
Any help would be appreciated

Hi there,
i'm having a similar problem to this when trying to run some web page speed optimisation software...
i think the issue also causes problems with the Opera browser (although this may have been fixed in the latest version).
anybody any ideas how to stop the header being sent in the response?
many thanks,
Andy

ACE : Stickyness problem with http cookies

Hi,
I am facing a serious problem with stickyness in a e-commerce configuration.
Here is the setup :
An ACE load balance user requests on two Apache servers
cookie-insert is used to stick a user on one Apache server
The home page is accessed via http on port 80
On the Home page, there is a link to allowing the user to login
The login process uses SSL
During the login, backend SSL is required between the ACE and the selected Apache server
The login is a POST request to the Apache server
After a successful login, the home page is reloaded on port 80 and the name of the user should appear on the top of the page
The ACE configuration :
Two sticky groups are configured : one for HTTP acess and another for HTTPS access
Two server farms are defined, both using the same real servers, but with different ports (80 and 441)
     sticky http-cookie STICKED-TO ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTP
       cookie insert browser-expire
       timeout 240
       replicate sticky
       serverfarm ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTP
          sticky http-cookie STICKED-TO ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTPS
       cookie insert browser-expire
       timeout 240
       replicate sticky
       serverfarm ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTPS
     serverfarm host ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTP
       description *** e-Commerce Test Server Farm ***
       probe ECOM_PROBE_TEST
       rserver HQCHECOM01 80
        inservice
       rserver HQCHECOM02 80
        inservice
         serverfarm host ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTPS
      description *** e-Commerce Test Server Farm ***
      probe ECOM_PROBE_TEST
      rserver HQCHECOM01 443
       inservice
      rserver HQCHECOM02 443
       inservice
The problem :
Let analyse the sequence of events and the value of the http cookie for each of them :
When the the home page is originally loaded, the ACE selects SERVER-1
The ACE inserts the cookie "A" in the server responses
The user is sticked to SERVER-1
Then, the user tries to login and an SSL session is established with the ACE
The user sends a POST request containing the cookie "A"
A backend SSL session is established with SERVER-1
The POST request is forwarded to SERVER-1
SERVER-1 responds with a 200 OK and the ACE generates another cookie "B" as it belongs to the sticky group ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTPS
The client browser reloads the page on port 80 and provides the cookie "B" (the last received) !!
The ACE sees the cookie "B" but does not find it in its database for the sticky group ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTP
The ACE perform another load balancing decision and selects SERVER-2 ! (instead of SERVER-1)
The page is reloaded, but the name of the user does not appear on it
The question :
As it is not possible to have only one sticky group in this configuration what would be the solution to make sure that the same server is selected for http and https ?
Thank you for any hints,
Yves

Hi Gilles,
I followed your recommendation to configure static cookie entries in each sticky group, but I still experience the problem of sessions getting re-load balanced to the second server when returning from HTTPS to HTTP :
It seems that the ACE ignores the static entries !
To make my question clear, I repeat hereafter the setup and the encountered problem :
Here is the setup :
An ACE load balance user requests on two Apache servers
cookie-insert is used to stick a user on one Apache server
The home page is accessed via http on port 80
On the Home page, there is a link to allowing the user to login
The login process uses SSL
During the login, backend SSL is required between the ACE and the selected Apache server
The login is a POST request to the Apache server
After a successful login, the home page is reloaded on port 80 and the name of the user should appear on the top of the page
The ACE configuration :
Two sticky groups are configured : one for HTTP acess and another for HTTPS access
Two server farms are defined, both using the same real servers, but with different ports (80 and 443)
In the ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTP stick group the two following cookies are automatically generated :
R105816849   for the server HQCHECOM01
R105852786   for the server HQCHECOM02
In the ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTPS stick group the two following cookies are automatically generated :
R355972695   for the server HQCHECOM01
R357158616   for the server HQCHECOM02
I statically configured in the each sticky group the cookies used by the other sticky group, to allow stickiness when the browser switches from HTTP to HTTPS and vice versa :
sticky http-cookie STICKED-TO ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTP
cookie insert browser-expire
timeout 240
replicate sticky
serverfarm ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTP backup WEB_REDIRECT_001
56 static cookie-value "R355972695" rserver HQCHECOM01
64 static cookie-value "R357158616" rserver HQCHECOM02
sticky http-cookie STICKED-TO ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTPS
cookie insert browser-expire
timeout 240
replicate sticky
serverfarm ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTPS backup WEB_REDIRECT_001
72 static cookie-value "R105816849" rserver HQCHECOM01
80 static cookie-value "R105852786" rserver HQCHECOM02
serverfarm host ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTP
description *** e-Commerce Test Server Farm ***
probe ECOM_PROBE_TEST
rserver HQCHECOM01 80
   inservice
rserver HQCHECOM02 80
   inservice
serverfarm host ECOM_FARM_TEST_HTTPS
description *** e-Commerce Test Server Farm ***
probe ECOM_PROBE_TEST
rserver HQCHECOM01 443
   inservice
rserver HQCHECOM02 443
   inservice
The problem :
Let analyse the sequence of events and the value of the http cookie for each of them :
When the the home page is originally loaded, the ACE selects SERVER-1
The ACE inserts the cookie "A" in the server responses
The user is sticked to SERVER-1
Then, the user tries to login and an SSL session is established with the ACE
The user sends a POST request containing the cookie "A"
A backend SSL session is established with SERVER-1
The POST request is forwarded to SERVER-1
SERVER-1 responds with a 200 OK and the ACE generates another cookie "B" as it belongs to the sticky group ECOM_STICKY_TEST_HTTPS
The client browser reloads the page on port 80 and provides the cookie "B" (the last received)
The ACE sees the cookie "B" and should use the static cookie entry to select the SERVER-1
But instead, the ACE perform another load balancing decision and selects SERVER-2 !
The page is reloaded, but the name of the user does not appear on it
LiveHTTP Trace on Firefox :
GET /ecom/medias/sys_master/8800775602206/Home-page-main-banners-video.jpg HTTP/1.1
Host: ecom.test.toto.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100202 (CK-IBM) Firefox/3.5.8
Accept: image/png,image/*;q=0.8,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105816849;
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105816849; path=/
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:31:37 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.13 (Red Hat)
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: image/jpeg
Here we switch on HTTPS :
https://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/j_spring_security_check
POST /uk/en/j_spring_security_check HTTP/1.1
Host: ecom.test.toto.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100202 (CK-IBM) Firefox/3.5.8
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105816849; JSESSIONID=089DCF987DC03CAE0F516298EB886DAB.node1;
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Content-Length: 75
spring-security-redirect=&j_username=yves144%40yahoo.com&j_password=junon01
Here we see cookie for the same server but for the HTTPS sticky group :
HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
Set-Cookie: STICKED-TO=R355972695; path=/
Set-Cookie: _hybris.tenantID_=""; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:10 GMT; Path=/; HttpOnly
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:31:39 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.13 (Red Hat)
Location: http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
Content-Length: 0
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Here we switch back to HTTP :
http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
GET /uk/en/home HTTP/1.1
Host: ecom.test.toto.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100202 (CK-IBM) Firefox/3.5.8
Accept: text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
Cookie: STICKED-TO=R355972695; JSESSIONID=089DCF987DC03CAE0F516298EB886DAB.node1;
Here we see that the second server has been wrongly selected !
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105852786; path=/
Set-Cookie: _hybris.tenantID_=""; Expires=Thu, 01-Jan-1970 00:00:10 GMT; Path=/; HttpOnly
Set-Cookie: JSESSIONID=5A0F6EB8FBF63D5D0590FECEC62A302E.node2; Path=/; HttpOnly
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:31:40 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.13 (Red Hat)
Pragma: no-cache
Expires: Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-cache, no-store
Content-Language: en-GB
Connection: close
Transfer-Encoding: chunked
Content-Type: text/html;charset=UTF-8
http://ecom.test.toto.com/ecom/medias/sys_master/8796174057502/uk.gif
GET /ecom/medias/sys_master/8796174057502/uk.gif HTTP/1.1
Host: ecom.test.toto.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100202 (CK-IBM) Firefox/3.5.8
Accept: image/png,image/*;q=0.8,*/*;q=0.5
Accept-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip,deflate
Accept-Charset: ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.7
Keep-Alive: 300
Connection: keep-alive
Referer: http://ecom.test.toto.com/uk/en/home
Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105852786; JSESSIONID=5A0F6EB8FBF63D5D0590FECEC62A302E.node2;
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Set-Cookie: STICKED-TO=R105852786; path=/
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:31:40 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.13 (Red Hat)
Content-Length: 382
Connection: close
Content-Type: image/gif
Hypothesis :
It seems that the static entries are not considered by the ACE...

Problem with Http RFC Scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for