Problem with master data lookup in transformations

Hi,
We're experiencing a strange problem in the transformations for an Error Reporting scenario.
We've the SAP standard customer (0CUSTOMER) in DSO 2 which derives it's value from the navigational attribute of YCUSTNR (0CUSTOMER is the navigational attribute of YCUSTNR) in DSO1. But the problem here is that even when there is no entry for YCUSTNR, the 0CUSTOMER in DSO 2 returns a value.
Referential Integrity check is not employed for this scenario. Is it because of this reason that lack of master data is returning some value held in memory. I'm not sure whether it's an issue with the cache. Is there any work around for solving this problem other than the standard master data look up?
Any help in this issue would be appreciated and rewarded.
Thanks & Regards
Hari

Note 1031553 - Reading master data returns value that does not exist
will solve this problem.
Regards,
József.

Similar Messages

Problem with Master Data Load

Dear Experts,
If somebody can help me by the following case, please give me some solution. Iu2019m working in a project BI 7.0 were needed to delete master data for an InfoObject material. The way that I took for this was through tcode u201CS14u201D. After that, I have tried to load again the master data, but the process was broken and the load done to half data.
This it is the error:
Second attempt to write record 'YY99993' to /BIC/PYYYY00006 failed
Message no. RSDMD218
Diagnosis
During the master data update, the master data tables are read to determine which records of the data package that was passed have to be inserted, updated, or modified. Some records are inserted in the master data table by a concurrently running request between reading the tables at the start of package processing and the actual record insertion at the end of package processing.
The master data update tries to overwrite the records inserted by the concurrently running process, but the database record modification returns an unexpected error.
Procedure
u2022     Check if the values of the master data record with the key specified in this message are updated correctly.
u2022     Run the RSRV master data test "Time Overlaps of Load Requests" and enter the current request to analyze which requests are running concurrently and may have affected the master data update process.
u2022     Re-schedule the master data load process to avoid such situations in future.
u2022     Read SAP note 668466 to get more information about master data update scheduling.
Other hand, the SID table in the master data product is empty.
Thanks for you well!
Luis

Dear Daya,
Thank for your help, but I was applied your suggesting. I sent to OSS with the following details:
We are on BI 7.0 (system ID DXX)
While loading Master Data for infoobject XXXX00001 (main characteristic in our system u2013 like material) we are facing the following error:
Yellow warning u201CSecond attempt to write record u20182.347.263u2019 to BIC/ XXXX00001 was successfulu201D
We are loading the Master data from data source ZD_BW_XXXXXXX (from APO system) through the DTP ZD_BW_XXXXX / XXX130 -> XXXX00001
The Master Data tables (S, P, X) are not updated properly.
The following reparing actions have been taken so far:
1.     Delete all related transactional and master data, by checking all relation (tcode SLG1 à RSDMD, MD_DEL)
2.     Follow instructions from OSS 632931 (tcode RSRV)
3.     Run report RSDMD_CHECKPRG_ALL from tcode SE38 (using both check and repair options).
After deleting all data, the previous tests were ok, but once we load new master data, the same problem appears again, and the report RSDMD_CHECKPRG_ALL gives the following error.
u201CCharacteristic XXXX00001: error fund during this test.u201D
The RSRV check for u201CCompare sizes of P and X and/or Q and Y tables for characteristic XXXX00001u201D is shown below:
Characteristic XXXX00001: Table /BIC/ PXXXX00001, /BIC/ XXXXX00001 are not consistent 351.196 derivation.
It seems that our problem is described in OSS 1143433 (SP13), even if we already are in SP16.
Could somebody please help us, and let us know how to solve the problem?
Thank for all,
Luis

Poor MDX performance on F4 master data lookup

Hi,

I've posted this to this forum as it didn't get much help in the BW 7.0 forum. I'm thinking it was too MDX oriented to get any help there. Hopefully someone has some ideas.

We have upgraded our BW system to 7.0 EHP1 SP6 from BW 3.5. There is substantial use of SAP BusinessObjects Enterprise XI 3.1 (BOXI) and also significant use of navigational attibutes. Everything works fine in 3.5 and we have worked through a number of performance problems in BW 7.0. We are using BOXI 3.1 SP1 but have tested with SP2 and it generates the same MDX. We do however have all the latest MDX related notes, including the composite note 1142664.

We have a number of "fat" queries that act as universes for BOXI and it is when BOXI sends a MDX statement that includes certain crossjoins with navigational attributes that things fall apart. This is an example of one that runs in about a minute in 3.5:

SELECT { [Measures]. [494GFZKQ2EHOMQEPILFPU9QMV], [Measures].[494GFZSELD3E5CY5OFI24BPCN], [Measures].[494GG07RNAAT6M1203MQOFMS7], [Measures]. [494GG0N4P7I87V3YBRRF8JK7R] } ON COLUMNS , NON EMPTY CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( CROSSJOIN( [0MAT_SALES__ZPRODCAT]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS, EXCEPT( { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M5], [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M6] } } ) ), EXCEPT( { [0SALES_OFF]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0SALES_OFF].[#] } } ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTAREA].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTREGN]. [LEVEL01].MEMBERS ), [ZMFIFWEEK].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS ) DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION ON ROWS FROM [ZMSD01/ZMSD01_QBO_Q0010]

However in 7.0 there appear to be some master data lookups that are killing performance before we even get to the BW queries. Note that in RSRT terms this is prior to even getting the popup screen withe "display aggregate".

They were taking 700 seconds but now take about 150 seconds after an index was created on the ODS /BIC/AZOSDOR0300. From what I can see, the navigational attributes require BW to ask "what are the valid SIDs for SALES_OFF in this multiprovider". The odd thing is that BW 3.5 does no such query. It just hits the fact tables directly.

SELECT "SID" , "SALES_OFF" FROM ( SELECT "S0000"."SID","P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000"."SALES_OFF" = "S0000"."SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BI0/D0PCA_C021" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDBL018" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR028" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR038" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR058" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDOR081" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "S0000"."SID" IN ( SELECT "D"."SID_0SALES_OFF" AS "SID" FROM "/BIC/DZBSDPAY016" "D" ) UNION SELECT "S0000"."SID" ,"P0000"."SALES_OFF" FROM "/BI0/PSALES_OFF" "P0000" JOIN "/BI0/SSALES_OFF" "S0000" ON "P0000" . "SALES_OFF" = "S0000" . "SALES_OFF" WHERE "P0000"."OBJVERS" = 'A' AND "P0000"."SALES_OFF" IN ( SELECT "O"."SALES_OFF" AS "KEY" FROM "/BIC/AZOSDOR0300" "O" ) ) ORDER BY "SALES_OFF" ASC

I had assumed this had something to do with BOXI - but I don't think this is a MDX specific problem, even though it's hard to test in RSRT as it's a query navigation. Also I assumed it might be something to do with the F4 master data lookup but that's not the case, because of course this "fat" query doesn't have a selection screen, just a small initial view and a large number of free characteristics. Still I set the characteristic settings not only to do lookups on the master data values and that made no difference. Nonetheless you can see in the MDXTEST trace that event 6001: F4: Read Data. Curiously this is an extra one that sits between event 40011: MDX Initialization and event 40010: MDX Execution.

I've tuned this query as much as I can from the Oracle perspective and checked the indexes and statistics. Also checked Oracle is perfectly tuned and parameterized as for 10.2.0.4 with the May 2010 patchset for AIX. But this query returns an estimated 56 million rows and runs an expensive UNION join on them - so no suprise that it's slow. As a point of interest changing it from UNION to UNION ALL cuts the time to 30 seconds. Don't think that helps me though, other than confirming that it is the sort which is expensive on 56m records.

Thinking that the UNORDER MDX statement might make a difference, I changed the MDX to the following but that didn't make any difference either.

SELECT { [Measures].[494GFZKQ2EHOMQEPILFPU9QMV], [Measures].[494GFZSELD3E5CY5OFI24BPCN], [Measures].[494GG07RNAAT6M1203MQOFMS7], [Measures].[494GG0N4P7I87V3YBRRF8JK7R] } ON COLUMNS ,
NON EMPTY UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
 UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
 UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
 UNORDER( CROSSJOIN(
 [0MAT_SALES__ZPRODCAT].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS, EXCEPT(
 { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M5], [0MAT_SALES__ZASS_GRP].[M6] } }
 ) ), EXCEPT(
 { [0SALES_OFF].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS } , { { [0SALES_OFF].[#] } }
 ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTAREA].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
 ) ), [0SALES_OFF__ZPLNTREGN].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
) ), [ZMFIFWEEK].[LEVEL01].MEMBERS
DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME, MEMBER_NAME, MEMBER_CAPTION ON ROWS FROM [ZMSD01/ZMSD01_QBO_Q0010]

Does anyone know why BW 7.0 behaves differently in this respect and what I can do to resolve the problem? It is very difficult to make any changes to the universe or BEx query because there are thousands of Webi queries written over the top and the regression test would be very expensive.

Regards,

John

Hi John,
couple of comments:
- first of all you posted it in the wrong forum. This belongs into the BW forum
- MDX enhancements in regards to BusinessObjects are part of BW 7.01 SP05 - not just BW 7.0
would suggest you post it in the BW forum
Ingo

Problem with universal data cleanse

I have problem with universal data cleanse.
I am using DS 3.2.x (12.2.2).
I created:
Dictionary: TEST
Classification: TEST_CL
Custom outputs: category: TEST_CAT
Dictionary Entry:
Primary: BO
Classification: TEST_CL
Gender: Unassigned
Secondary information:
When used as: TEST_CAT
Standard: Business Objects
Rule file:
DataCleanse Rule File v2.0;
TEST_CAT = TEST_CL;
action = TEST_CAT;
TEST_CAT = 1 : TEST_CAT : 1;
end_action
Data Cleanse:
Input: Multiline1
Options:
Parsing Dictionary: TEST
Rule file: .../test_rules.dat
Break On Whitespace Only: Yes
Parser Sequences Multiline1: TEST_CAT
Output:
Parent_component: TEST_CAT1
Generated_field_name: TEST_CAT and RULE_LABEL
Generated_field_class: parsed/standardized
Contenet_type: none
and EXTRA field
I wanted to replace word u201CBOu201D with the standard words u201CBusiness Objectu201D, but I have result: there is "BO" in the extra field,
there are "null" in others fields.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks for all help!
P.S. I don't have cleansing packages installer.

There seem to be a couple of things going on here:
1. If you are using your custom dictionaries, then you have to map your input to MULTILINE1 and enable the custom parsers - just something to be aware of
2. You mentioned that you made some changes to the existing dictionary and you are not seeing any changes. To be clear, do you have different TEST and PRODUCTION environments? Or is it the same environment except that you have a local DS repository and for the dictionary you are pointing to another repository (using Dictionary --> Manage Connections)?
Having the dictionaries on a different repository should not make any difference as long as you point to them in your designer using the Dictionary --> Manage Connection option.
So I think there may be some issue with your job setup and/or dictionary values need to be looked at. You can start by adding another output field named "EXTRA" to see whether or not your data is getting parsed at all. Also, make sure the entry "CLEANME" is classified as FIRM_NAME_ALONE in the dictionary and that you are selecting the correct dictionary name in the Datacleanse Transform options.

ABAP for Master Data lookup

I am trying ABAP for master data lookup in update rule.
Here is the scenario ---
There is a Master Data object MDABC with attributes A1 , A2 . I need to Map IO1 to A1 and IO2 to A2.
What should be the Start Routine and Update Routine . Please help with a working code.
Thanks

>
sap_newbee wrote:
> Thanks Aashish ,
> Here is the code I am usind but Its not populating any result May be you could help me out in debugging
>
>
> Start Routine -
>
> DATA: BEGIN OF ITAB_MDABC OCCURS 0,
> MDABC LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/MDABC,
> A1 LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/A1,
> A2 LIKE /BIC/PMDABC-/BIC/A2,
> END OF ITAB_NMDABC.
>
> SELECT
> /BIC/MDABC
> /BIC/A1
> /BIC/A2
> FROM /BIC/PMDABC INTO TABLE ITAB_MDABC
> FOR ALL ENTRIES IN DATA_PACKAGE
> WHERE /BIC/MDABC = DATA_PACKAGE-/BIC/MDABC.
> ENDSELECT.
>
>
> In Update Routine for Infoobject IO1 The code Iam using is
>
>
> READ TABLE ITAB_MDABC   WITH KEY
> MDABC   = COMM_STRUCTURE-/BIC/MDABC
> BINARY SEARCH.
> IF sy-subrc = 0.
> RESULT = ITAB_MDABC-A1.
> ENDIF.
>   RETURNCODE = 0.
>
>   ABORT = 0.
>
> Please help.
> Thanks
Please use table in the select statement. Modifications in BOLD
Edited by: Ashish Gour on Oct 17, 2008 2:57 PM

0CALDAY for time dependent master data lookup unknown when migrated to 7.0

I am in the process of migrating a number of InfoProviders from the 3.x Business Content to the new methodology for BI 2004s.
When I try to create a transformation from the Update Rules for 0PA_C01, all of the rules that use a master data lookup into 0EMPLOYEE give me the error such as "Rule 41 (target field: 0PERSON group: Standard Group): Time char. 0CALDAY in rule unknown".
How do I fix the transformation rule that is generated from the update rule for these time-dependent master data attributes?

Hi Mark,
look at http://www.service.sap.com/. I guess you need to implement some corrections or newer supp-packages.
kind regards
Siggi
PS: take a look: https://websmp104.sap-ag.de/~form/handler?_APP=01100107900000000342&_EVENT=REDIR&_NNUM=941525&_NLANG=EN
Message was edited by:
Siegfried Szameitat

Assigning InfoObject with Master Data as InfoProvider

Hi,
In BW 3.x we used to assign the InfoObject with Master Data as InfoProvider only if we want to perform Query on that InfoObject.
But in BI 2004's, is it must to assign InfoObject with Master Data as an InfoProvider???
Because when I create the Transformation to load Text or Attribute Data, the system automatically assigs that InfoObject as an InfoProvider.
Is there a way to skip using that InfoObject as an InfoProvider during Tranformation if I do not want to perform any reporting on it.
Thanks,

Hello Sesh,
No. It is not possible.
However for easy grouping, create another infoarea and attach all report relevent infoproviders under this infoarea.
Ravindra

Read Master Data in BW Transformation

Hi,
     I am using BW 740 SP02 and I need in a transformation rule to use the option "READ MASTER DATA", In fact this enables me to use all attributes of an infoObject and affect them to my data target ( Infocube).
     I was wondering if there would be any possibility to affect also master data text of an infoObject and affect them to a data target?
I know that master data text are available through Bex queries, but for my case I need to have them in my Infocube.
Best Regards,
RAFIK

Hi Mohamed,
Using standard rule type this is not possible
However there are two ways to achieve this:
1. you use abap routine to read the text value from text table of info object (BIC/Txxx) in transformation
2. a. add a char info object to your master data
    b. create another transformation from text data source to populate this new field (which is actually text)
    c. create DTP to populate this new field with text values
    d. now you can easily use, 'read master data' rule in transformation and assign the text field to your target field
hope this helps,
Purvang

0CALMONTH2 with Master data

Hi folks,
anyone here, who can explain, why i cannot activate check box "with Master data" for InfoObject 0CALMONTH2? Other time characteristics can be set "with Master data".
I want to create a query, which consist out of two key figures. One with costs of the current year and one with costs of the previous year. The key figures should be drilled down by 0CALMONTH2. The problem is, that the fiscal year starts in October. But October, November and December are listed at the end of the table, on the right side. The table should start with October! So i want to use a display attribute on characteristic 0CALMONTH2, that defines sort sequence for months. But unfortunately i can't do so....
Ideas?

Hi Shantanu,
Is the info-object a "referenced" info-object?
(in the right top corner you will find "Reference Char."
Then you can only change the original Info-object.
Udo

Problem with Java Dates and UPDATE for SQL2000

I am having problems with the date formats for Java. I am trying to put the current date time into a SQL table, here it the code I am using:
var Today = new Date()
var conn = Server.CreateObject( "ADODB.Connection" )
conn.Open( "Provider=SQLOLEDB;Server=(local);Database=BillTracking;UID=sa;PWD=;")
var sql = "UPDATE BillAssignments SET DatePosted = " + Today + " WHERE AssignmentID = '" + Request.QueryString("AssignmentID") + "'"
var rs = conn.execute(sql)
I keep getting different errors and I have been unable to find a solution yet. I know that I need to change the date format from the Java standard to the one that SQL likes.
Help....
Norm...

Please tell us where the Java part of this comes in. I see that you are using JavaScript to load up data via an ADO connection (presumably on an IIS platform) - but I do not see where you are using Java
Lee

Problem with billing date at closed period

Hi
We have a problem with billing date in transaction . Previously we could set up different (earlier) billing date than the actual posting period and now it is not working. We receive an error message that the posting period is closed ) .
I attached an example invoice which we managed to post and where you can see what Iu2019m thinking about, parking number: 1024337, BILLING DOCUMENT: 841835. In this case the billing date was at 30.11.2007, but the posting in 15.07.2008 and we managed to post.
Pls help that issue
yps

hi,
it is due to posting period closed for the month of 07/2008.
u need to open posting during that period.
Regards,
Greeshma

Use of "with master data & with out master data" at DTP update level

Hello experts,
In DTP, I check "with out master data". When I try to send corresponding transactional data, It is showing SID related error. Can anybody suggest what is the use of "with master data & with out master data" at DTP level.
Thanks in advance,
Zakir.

HI
HI in DTP level If you set this indicator, the system terminates the update of the request if no values are available for a data record.
Load the relevant master data before you load the transaction data.
If you set this indicator, the system terminates activation if master data is missing and produces an error message.
If you do not set this indicator, the system generates any missing SID values during activation.
In DataStore maintenance, if you do not set the SIDs Generation upon Activation indicator, the No Update without Master Data indicator in the DTP has no effect.
thx
vijju

Facing problem with a date column in select query

Hi,
I am facing problem with a date column. Below is my query and its fainling with " invalid number format model" .
Query: SELECT *
FROM EMP
WHERE trunc(LAST_UPDATED) >= to_date(to_char(22-05-2009,'dd-mm-yyyy'),'dd-mm-yyyy')
LAST_UPDATED column is "DATE" data type.
Please help me Thanks

Radhakrishna Sarma wrote:
SeánMacGC wrote:
WHERE LAST_UPDATED >= to_date('22-05-2009','dd-mm-yyyy');
You do not need the TRUNC here in any case.
I don't think so. What if the user wants only data for 22nd May and the table has records with date later than 22nd also? In that case your query willl not work. In order for the Index to work, I think the query can be written like this I think Sean is right though. Use of TRUNC Function is quiet useless based on the condition given here, since the to_date Function used by OP will always point to midnight of the specified date, in this case 22-05-2009 00:00:00.
Regards,
Jo
Edit: I think Sean proved his point... ;)

How to start with Master data management

Hi All,
I want to start with Master Data Management. Can any one provide me proper material to get the knowledge on Master Data Management Integration. And What is the relationship between XI.and for starting MDM what all settings i have to do???
Its really urget plz help me out.
Thanks,
Seema Khandelwal
Message was edited by:
Seema khandelwal

Hi ..
look at this documents
/people/andreas.seifried/blog/2007/08/30/how-to-use-the-test-environment-of-the-mdm-enrichment-controller
/people/harrison.holland5/blog/2006/11/27/mdm-syndication
/people/harrison.holland5/blog/2007/01/22/testing-and-monitoring-an-interface-between-mdm-xi
see this Wiki to find all the documentation on MDM:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/MasterDataManagement
Here, for the components you need to install:
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/HOME/MasterDataManagement+Components
Others smart links are here:
- sdn e-learning.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/mdm-elearning
http://service.sap.com/installMDM for a
you can use expression editor to do that:
have a look at this guide on how dates can be calculated there
with your field it can be very similar:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/b025fab3-b3e9-2910-d999-a27b7a075a16
for more details about expression editor:
Calculation Fields chapter
https://websmp108.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700006291622006E
MDM 5.5 SP05 - ABAP API
https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000271902007E
MDM 5.5 SP05 - ABAP API How To Guides (ZIP File)
https://websmp101.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700000271912007E
How to Identify Identical Master Data Records Using SAP MDM 5.5 ABAP APIs
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e060251e-b58d-2910-02a2-c9a1d60d9116

Problem with loading data to Essbase

Hi All,
I have a problem with loading data into Essbase. I've prepared maxl script to load the data, calling rule file. The source table is located in RDBMS Oracle. The script works correctly, ie. generally loads data into Essbase.
But the problem lies in the fact, that after deletion of data from Essbase, when I'm trying to load it again from the source table I get the message: WARNING - 1003035 - No data values modified by load of this data file - although there is no data in Essbase... I've also tried to change the mode of loading data from 'overwrite' to 'add to existing values' (in rule file) but it does'nt help ... Any ideas what can I do?

Below few lines from EPM_ORACLE_INSTANCE/diagnostics/logs/essbase/dataload_ODL.err:
[2013-09-24T12:01:40.480-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1160] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1116830016] Received Validate Login Session request
[2013-09-24T12:01:40.482-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1114724672] Received client request: Get App and Database Status (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.488-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1101564224] Received client request: MaxL: Execute (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.492-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1115777344] Received client request: MaxL: Describe (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.492-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [MLEXEC-2] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1115777344] Output columns described
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.494-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1102616896] Received client request: MaxL: Define (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.494-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1102616896] Received client request: MaxL: Fetch (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.494-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [MLEXEC-3] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1102616896] Record(s) fetched
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.496-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1116830016] Received client request: MaxL: Fetch (from user [admin@Native Directory])
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.498-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1160] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1114724672] Received Validate Login Session request
[2013-09-24T12:01:54.499-10:01] [ESSBASE0] [AGENT-1001] [NOTIFICATION] [16][] [ecid:1379989900303,0] [tid:1101564224] Received client request: Get Application State (from user [admin@Native Directory])

Problem with master data lookup in transformations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for