Problem with the SOAP adapter !

Hi!
We are trying to use a WebServices from XI.
In the WSDL file that we have imported and use'd in
our mapping the information about the soap header look's
like this :
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="toCountry" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="fromCountry" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="language" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="customerCodeOwner" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="customerCode" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="userId" use="literal" />
<wsdlsoap:header message="impl:serviceRequest" part="userPassword" use="literal" />
But then the message leave the SOAP adapter
it looks like this:
<SOAP:Envelope xmlns:SOAP='http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/'>
<SOAP:Header/>
<SOAP:Body>
<ns1:serviceRequest xmlns:ns1='http://www.dnbnordic.com/brg/NRGDecisionSupportDSC/wsdl'>
<nRGDecisionSupportDSCRequest>
<ns2:criteria xmlns:ns2='http://www.dnbnordic.com/brg/NRGDecisionSupportDSC/request'>
<ns2:socialSecurityNumberApplicant>XXXXXXXXXX</ns2:socialSecurityNumberApplicant>
<ns2:conversationCode>X</ns2:conversationCode>
</ns2:criteria>
</nRGDecisionSupportDSCRequest>
<toCountry>XX</toCountry>
<fromCountry>XX</fromCountry>
<language>XX</language>
<customerCodeOwner>SYD9001</customerCodeOwner>
<customerCode>XXXXXXX</customerCode>
<userId>XXXX</userId>
<userPassword>XXXXXX</userPassword>
</ns1:serviceRequest>
</SOAP:Body>
</SOAP:Envelope>
The SOAP header info. is in the body !
Ofcourse the message fails !!
Any ideas ??
//Stig

Hi Stig,
Although specified in the WSDL 1.1 spec, the use of soap:header is quite rare.
And having a soap header consisting of multiple parts and not referring to single XSDL element is a bit in conflict with the document/literal approach.
Bottom line: please try and convince your business partner to not use the soap:header trick and stick to standard document/literal web services.
Kind regards, Guy Cretgs

Similar Messages

  • "Performance" problems with the File adapter on Plain J2SE Adapter Engine

    Hi,
    At the moment I'm on a customer side to solve some XI issues for a few days. One of the issues is the performance of the Plain J2SE Adapter Engine, using the file adapter to transfer XML messages(already XI message format) from the legacy system to the Integration Engine. The File adapter has to deal with "large" XML messages(max at the moment is 65 Mb) and the engine fails with the following error when transferring the big XML file: "ERROR: Finished sending to Integration Engine with error "java.lang.OutOfMemoryError". Skip confirmation and quit this loop".
    As far I got the information from the customer the memory use of the Plain adapter engine is set to 512Mb. This is maybe to low. But I don't know where to look for this, I only have the adapter web interface in front of me, no access to the OS it self via for example remote connection.
    On the Integration Engine I know there is the ability to split large message with the file adapter(File Content Conversion), but I don't know this for the Plain Adapter Engine. Is there a possibility to do this also on the Plain Adapter Engine?
    Thanks in advance for any input.
    Greetings,
    Patrick

    Hi Sameer,
    Thanks for your answers.
    On the first solution, yes that is possible, we first decided to see if the legacy system can do the splitting, before starting developing a Java program.
    On the second solution, as far as I know is this solution possible on the Integration Engine. But we are facing the problems on the Plain J2SE Adapter Engine. I went trough that documentation(link:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6f/246b3de666930fe10000000a114084/frameset.htm ), to look for I similiar solution in the Plain Adapter Engine. So my question is, is this possible with the Plain Adapter? And if so, what kind of parameters I need to use to achieve this.
    Regards,
    Patrick

  • A problem with the network adapter, help please

    I have an hp touchsmart pc 600 1040uk and today i woke up to find that the network adapter (nVIDIA) dissapeared and no local area connection. Also i can not connect to the wireless network
    I tried everything starting by restarting my router then removing all the cables and retarting the pc. Also tried adding a new device and everything didnt work. I even restored the pc to the factory settings and after starting over new still there is no local area network, just the wireless and bluetooth adapters and the wireless did not connect
    Another problem is that when i restored the pc to factory settings the recovery program asked me to backup my pc and I did the backup and saved it in an external hard disk, and now I cant restore that back coz it dosent appear in the window of backups to restore
    Plllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllease help me, thanks

    I found this on another post by "Scott", and it worked. 
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2048?viewlocale=en_US
    Sure did take some searching to get to the answer.

  • A problem with the File adapter receiver

    Hi people,
    In the Integration Monitoring the system represent this problem:
    File adapter receiver channel Mainframe_FA_StructureAch_CC_RC is not initialized. Unable to proceed: null
    Any body can help me!!
    Thanks!!

    Hi ,
    Just check is it Activated ? Go to RWB->Adapter Monitoring
    Check the status there ..
    To more- Go to service market place to view the Adapter Monitoring PDF
    https://websmp103.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700002757652005E/HowtoMintorAF.pdf
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Moorthy

  • Problem in the SOAP ADAPTER

    Iam getting following error when iam trying to view the wsdl for bapi_user_get_details.Any help?
    Error when processing your request
    What has happened?
    The URL http://pdcntwr.wipro.com:8000/sap/bc/srt/rfc/sap/bapi_user_get_detail was not called due to an error.
    Note
    The following error text was processed in the system NAJ : An exception that could not be caught occurred.
    The error occurred on the application server PDCNTWR_NAJ_00 and in the work process 0 .
    The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
    The ABAP call stack was:
    Form: HANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_SOAP_TRANSPORT_EXTENSN_ROOTCP
    Form: HANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_SOAP_HTTP_EXTENSION========CP
    Form: IF_HTTP_EXTENSION~HANDLE_REQUEST of program CL_SOAP_HTTP_EXTENSION========CP
    Form: EXECUTE_REQUEST of program CL_HTTP_SERVER================CP
    Function: HTTP_DISPATCH_REQUEST of program SAPLHTTP_RUNTIME
    Module: %_HTTP_START of program SAPMHTTP

    Hi Ravikumar,
    Could you please provide more details about what exactly are you trying to achieve and a short description of your scenario?
    Do you want to see the details in the WSDL file ? Or Are you trying to access a web service defined in this WSDL file?
    Thanks,
    Rob.

  • Issue with Receiver SOAP adapter for synchronous scenario

    Hello All,
    We are facing a strange issue with the SOAP adapter in the interface we have setup. This is the 1st time we are using SOAP adapter in our system (PI 7.11 SP7). We are making a synchronous HTTP call to the web service exposed by another system in our landscape. The payload is send with SOAP envelope and there are no credentials to be maintained in PI settings.
    The issue is that we are always getting timeout exception in PI audit logs after sending the request (3 minutes - standard timeout value, no additional config for this). But target system has confirmed that they are sending the response back. We tested from our server OS level and have received the response back in the same screen (to verify there is no firewall/port issue in between the systems). But when tried from RWB, it is always giving the timeout exception and we are not able to see any other log.
    We have tried checking in the NWA logs as well after increasing the logging level to ALL for com.sap.aii.adapter.soap. But surprisingly, we didn't get any logs at all for the outgoing SOAP call or incoming response and hence we are unable to trace the issue.
    We have setup another synchronous inbound SOAP interface (PI exposing the webservice) and it is working fine. We are also able to trace the logs in both audit log and NWA logs.
    Is there anywhere else we can check for the logs? Audit logs is showing timeout error and we are not able to see anything in NWA logs.
    Does the target system need to maintain PI credentials in the header when they send the synchronous response back?
    Are there any specific settings which should be checked to enable the sync communication? (this should not be the case since the inbound interface is working fine)
    Please help.
    Thanks
    Justin

    Hi Amit,
    Thanks for the reply.
    Yes we had tested successfully via SOAP UI as well (forgot to mention that). We are getting back the expected response in SOAP UI without using any credentials. We got the same response when we tested it through OS commands from PI server.
    The WS is hosted by the target system and they haven't maintained any credentials at their end. So when PI is trying to access, we don't need to provide any credentials. My question is, whether the target system should keep any credentials to send the synchronous response back to PI (java stack). We have tried that as well but since there aren't any logs, we are unable to verify whether the credentials are coming correctly.
    The service interfaces are correct and PI configuration are OK. I will try the XPI inspector for logs as you have suggested.
    Thanks
    Justin

  • Is anyone else experiencing problems with the thunderbolt port on their Mac Mini's regarding using it to connect a second monitor? I've got the Mini Display Port to DVI-D adapter along with a DVI-D cable and I can't get an image on the second monitor.

    I had an dual display image / setup working twice for a few seconds, but then it cut out. I think there may be a problem with the thunderbolt port.

    As far as I can tell you have only listed that you have a DVI monitor connected to the Mini Displayport socket (i.e. the Thunderbolt socket) via presumably the Apple Mini Displayport to DVI adapter and a DVI to DVI cable.
    You don't appear to have listed what the second monitor is and how it is connected (even though not working). As such I cannot tell what may be wrong.

  • Messages failing in the SOAP adapter with the errror

    HI 
    I am getting the below error in the SOAP adapter monitoring . can any body tell what does "No route to host: Connect" mean .
    could some one help us on resolving this .
    Error Exception caught by adapter framework: No route to host: connect
    Error Delivery of the message to the application using connection SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: No route to host: connect: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host: connect. Setting message to status failed.
    Error The message status set to FAIL.
    Error Returning synchronous error message to calling application: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: No route to host: connect: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host: connect.
    thanks and regards
    sandeep

    Hi!
    First please confirm whether you are working on XI or PI 7.1 ?
    because in XI you need to generate WSDL manaually via Tools>Define Web service-Giving Input..and in XI you need to test the SOAP scenario from external tool like Altova xml spy tool kit or else SOAP client tool.
    In PI 7.1::
    You can publish directly the web service in the SERVICE REGISTRY from sender agreement onwards.
    once it is published you can check the status on your interface in service registry as CONFIGURED..Okay
    Here you can test directly in service registry...
    According to your error check ocne agan even though you gone through all the steps..
    1. Check whether the SOAP service is active or not in SICF>SAP>bc>XI>Service-->SOAP.
    2. sicne after generating wSDL u can get one url right that URL itself acts as  a gateway to enter the source data into XI..
    lets give to the source team to try with XI super uID adn PWD as authentification.
    3. Also please STOP ur communication Channel and start once again.
    4. Please check whether the WEB Service is configured correctly or not.
    Regards::
    Amar Srinivas Eli

  • Problems when calling the SOAP adapter from a Webdynpro

    Hi,
    An error occurs in the SOAP adapter when sending a message from a Webdynpro client. I have downloaded the SAP Soap Client and made the same test and that works fine.
    I had to do some debugging to finally find the stack trace found below.
    Does anybody have an idea of why the call doesn't work from Webdynpro?
    <text>com.sap.aii.af.service.cpa.CPAException: invalid channel (party:service:channel) = &lt;null&gt;
         at com.sap.aii.af.mp.soap.web.MessageServlet.getChannelID(MessageServlet.java:415)
         at com.sap.aii.af.mp.soap.web.MessageServlet.doPost(MessageServlet.java:377)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.runServlet(HttpHandlerImpl.java:390)
         at com.sap.engine.services.servlets_jsp.server.HttpHandlerImpl.handleRequest(HttpHandlerImpl.java:264)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:347)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.startServlet(RequestAnalizer.java:325)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.invokeWebContainer(RequestAnalizer.java:887)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.RequestAnalizer.handle(RequestAnalizer.java:241)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Client.handle(Client.java:92)
         at com.sap.engine.services.httpserver.server.Processor.request(Processor.java:148)
         at com.sap.engine.core.service630.context.cluster.session.ApplicationSessionMessageListener.process(ApplicationSessionMessageListener.java:33)
         at com.sap.engine.core.cluster.impl6.session.MessageRunner.run(MessageRunner.java:41)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.ActionObject.run(ActionObject.java:37)
         at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.execute(SingleThread.java:95)
         at com.sap.engine.core.thread.impl3.SingleThread.run(SingleThread.java:160)</text>
    </s:SystemError>
    Thanks for help,
    Hans

    Hi Suraj
    First I should mention that I have imported a generated WSDL from XI to create the Model and thus the port configuration. The URL looks like this:
    http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?Version=3.0&amp;Channel=:Telia_Kundservice_portal:Sender_SOAP&amp;version=3.0&amp;Sender.Service=Telia_Kundservice_portal&amp;Interface=urn%3Aacandofrontec.se%2FTelia%2Ffaktura%5ETelia_faktura_4
    Service = Telia_Kundservice_portal
    Channel = Sender_SOAP
    I've also tried with a modified shorter version which is also the one I'm using from the SAP SOAP client.
    http://<host>:<port>/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=:Telia_Kundservice_portal:Sender_SOAP
    The actual call is a typical one:
    wdContext.currentRequest_Faktura().modelObject().execute();
    Before this call the Basic authentication (user/passw) is set.
    Regards,
    Hans

  • File upload with the SOAP Axis Framework

    Hi,
    my scenario is as follows:
    ERP --> PI --> System A (3rd party application)
    ERP sends data (IDoc) to the PI and is mapped there to a xml structure expected by A.
    IDoc --> PI --> target xml structure
    On A runs a Web service (Axis Framework) with a method uploadFile that expects one parameter (client of A) and the file for the upload has to come as attachment (call.addAttachment).
    I imported already the wsdl and can see the message uploadFile in the IR. The Axis Framework is also available already in the SOAP adapter.
    So I have
    IDoc --> PI --> target xml structure
    but want to call
    PI --> uploadFile(client) \[with the target xml structure as attachment\]
    How can I map the parameter to uploadFile and get the mapped xml structure as attachment?
    Thanks and regards
    Patrick

    Hi,
    thanks for your answer. The PayloadSwapBean could be a solution for the problem and I will try to use it.
    Here is another (simplified) version of my scenario:
    I have one source interface with three data fields
    SD1
    SD2
    SD3
    This should get mapped to a target interface with two data fields
    TD1
    TD2
    So if a source message arrives at PI a Message Mapping is called and the message gets mapped to the target structure.
    The result of this mapping should get the attachment of a Web service call.
    In a sample client for this Web service it looks like:
          Service service = new Service();
          Call call = (Call) service.createCall();
          call.setOperationName(new QName(... "uploadFile"));
          call.addAttachmentPart(...);
    The target interface of the Web service is the message uploadFile in an imported wsdl file. This interface has one data field
    WSD1
    and is independent of the other data fields.
    For filling WSD1 another mapping is necessary (or maybe not?).
    Regards
    Patrick

  • Minor Problem with MagSafe Power Adapter

    I got my MBP almost a year ago now (partially why I'm asking the question) and I've noticed that my power adapter doesn't always show the charge light. Sometimes it is not on at all, and sometimes it is less bright in color (both green and amber).
    If I remove it and put it back it usually corrects itself.
    It if fully functional; even if the light is completely out and plugged in it still shows as charging.
    So, is this normal? I never remember having this sort of problem with my PB G4.

    I would think the led light on my adapter cable was broken, but I discovered it works fine on a co-workers MBP. His adapter, which we know works, does NOT work (ie. the led does not come on) when attached to my computer. This indicate to me that the problem, whatever it is, can sometimes be with the computer and not the adapter.
    I would be curious if others with apparently dead leds have tried their chargers on other MBPs.
    Here's the long version of my story:
    My 5W MagSafe completely fried after only 9 months.
    The new adapter was fine for several days until this morning.
    My "low battery" warning popped up, so so I plugged it in to recharge and immediately noticed the little led on the charger cord did not come on.
    I found it hard to believe that I had another bad adapter, so before making the trip back to the store, I went into the studio where there are some other MBP users.
    I plugged my adapter into another laptop and the led came on. It appeared to function completely normally. I tried MagSafe adapters from two other MBPs, but the led did not come on on either of them while attached to my computer.
    This made me think there was some sort of problem with the connector on the computer itself. Just visually, it appears to be clean and corrosion free.
    The next obvious step, it seemed, would have been to try swapping batteries with the other laptops, but mine is a 17" and everyone else here has 15"... and so we have different battery sizes.
    One of the people here at the studio had a little utility called "Coconut Battery", that reports information about the battery health. When I ran it on my laptop, I got what I thought were rather surprising results.
    It showed the usual things like current charge (21%), battery capacity and so on. But under "Additional Info" it said "Charger connected: Yes" and "Battery is charging: No".
    I figured this narrowed it down to a problem with the battery. But as I was showing these results to my co-worker, the "Current Battery Charge" changed from 21 to 22%. Huh? We left it plugged in and it continued to show a steady climb in the charge, as if it is working normally. Except there is no led light, and the software still says it is not charging. Odd.
    I then noticed that the built-in battery level indicator on the status bar was also showing the same increases. The led lights on the back of the battery are indicating an increase as well.
    Just out of curiosity, I ran a second battery health analyzer program and again got these conflicting results. This one reported the same battery charge and capacity and so on as the previous one. It also recognized that the laptop was running off of AC power, that there was a battery, but it said "Not Chargeable."
    So now I am going to let it continue until I have a full charge and then see if the computer will run as usual from the battery.
    I don't think the store here is going to give me another adapter since this one appears to work just fine on the other computers.
    Any thoughts on why the led would work on other laptops but not mine?
    Why the battery health monitors report that the battery is being charged, but also that it is "not chargeable"?

  • Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.

    I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
    Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
    Are you on the 20/5 connection?
    If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
    I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
    Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
    When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
    I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
    From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
    His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
    The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
    The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
    My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
    Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
    We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
    I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
    This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
    We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
    This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
    If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
    My contact information,
    I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...

    Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
    Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
    Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
    Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
    Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
    We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
    It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
    Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
    I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
    So now we have three choices,
    We can go back to Windows XP.
    We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
    Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
    Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
    Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
    Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM

  • How to solve a serious problem with the Battary of my T500 laptop ?

    Hi Forum,
    My personal laptop is Lenovo THINKPAD T500 2055, and its main specifications are as follows:
    - 39T6651 SBB 9 CELL LI-ION BATTERY
    - Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9400 (2.53GHz 1066MHz 6MBL2)
    - 8 GB DDR3 SDRAM Memory Module 4 GB (2 x 4 GB) 1066MHz DDR31066/PC38500 DDR3 SDRAM SoDIMM Kingston.
    - 2 GB Intel Turbo Memory hard drive cache.
    - ATI Mobility Radeon 3650 with 256MB.
    - 160 GB Hard Disk Drive, 7200rpm.
    - Windows 7 Ultimate with the latest Service Pack (x64).
    My problem precisely and concisely is the Battary. I have been using my laptop with the same battary since 01.01.2009 (Almost 3.5 Years), and the battary has been working quite OK.
    Most of the time my laptop is plugged in and working with the electricity. However, A very few times I used the laptop while it is running on battery, Nevertheless, I have the habit to empty the batter once in a while i.e. Every 3 weeks, I unplug the charger and keep using the laptop till I see the warning orange sign (5%), then, I plug it in again.
    Thankfully, I never had any problems with the battary nor the laptop, and when I charge the laptop usually it shows full sign (100%).
    Three days ago, All of a sudden my laptop starts flashing the orange battary sign constantly while charge indicates 100%. When I try running on the battery by unplugging the AC adapter, the laptop loses power immediately and shuts down right away.
    What do you think should I do? Could you please provide me any useful tips to resolve this problem?
    I would greatly and sincerely appreciate all your inputs !
    Thanks for your consideration of my request, and I very much look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience !
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    In the control panel goto the "Lenovo - Power Manager" and click the battery tab, there is a maintenance button in there that will let you change the charging profile for your battery.   (from memory, so exact wording may be off)
     The lower the numbers you use there, the longer the battery *should* last.    These batteries degrade faster at higher charge levels, however storing them at too low of levels is also not good for them... I've read that 40% is optimal, but just not realistic if you use your computer.
    --- ThinkPad T61 / Win 7 / Core 2 / 4gb RAM / Nvidia / Still used daily --- ThinkPad Edge 15/ i5 / Win 7 / TrueCrypt / 8gb RAM / Hated it, died at 1 yr 1 mo old --- ThinkPad T510 / Win 7 / TrueCrypt / i5 / 8gb RAM / Nvidia / Current primary machine --- ThinkPad X220 / i7 / IPS / 4gb / TrueCrypt / My Road Machine

  • Issues with the SQL wrapper scripts created with the DB adapter

    Hi All,
    We have the wrapper sql scripts created with the DB adapter configurations which are being used to invoke the stored procedures.
    To give you a background on the wrapper sql scripts-The Adapter Configuration wizard generates a wrapper API when a PL/SQL API has arguments of data types, such as PL/SQL Boolean, PL/SQL Table, or PL/SQL Record.
    These two SQL files are saved in the same directory where the WSDL and XSD files are stored, and are available in the Project view.
    The issue we are facing now is that whenever the associated package or the procedure structure undergoes a change we see an error as given below:
    An unhandled exception has been thrown in the ESB system. The exception reported is: "org.collaxa.thirdparty.apache.wsif.WSIFException: esb:///ESB_Projects/Application1_ABC_ESB/DBADP_Update_Out.wsdl [ DBADP_Update_Out_ptt::DBADP_Update_Out(InputParameters,OutputParameters) ] - WSIF JCA Execute of operation 'DBADP_Update_Out' failed due to: Error while trying to prepare and execute an API. An error occurred while preparing and executing the APPS.XXIRIS_SOA_R_WRAPPER.XXIRIS_AR_CUST_K$ API. Cause: java.sql.SQLException: ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded ORA-04061: existing state of package body "APPS.XXIRIS_AR_CUST_K" has been invalidated ORA-04065: not executed, altered or dropped package body "APPS.XXIRIS_AR_CUST_K" ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called: "APPS.XXIRIS_AR_CUST_K" ORA-06512: at "APPS.XXIRIS_SOA_R_WRAPPER", line 1 ORA-06512: at line 1 [Caused by: ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded ORA-04061: existing state of package body
    In such cases we need to either execute the wrapper scripts again or refresh the connection pool in case the wrapper sql scripts for that procedure are not available.
    In some cases we see that the first instance errors out.However the second request and the subsequent requests after that goes through successfully.
    Please do let me know if anyone has faced such issues before.
    Any inputs in this regard would be of great help.
    Thanks in advance!
    Deepthi                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

    I stumbled on a link in the oracle forum which says that the "create or replace package XXX" at the start of the PL/SQL procedure when run seems to intermittently cause the ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded problem.
    As per the solution suggested an “alter package XXX compile" can be executed after the changes are made and then we would no longer get the error in BPEL/ESB and dont have to bounce the server too.
    __http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=185762_
    However the above solution does not seem to resolve the issue.
    Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Deepthi

  • Creation of IBASE with the XIF adapter

    Hello,
    I am trying to create IBASES using the XIF adapter (LSMW). The actual creation of the IBASE is no problem, but creating an IBASE with a partner + address connection seems not to work. In HELP.SAP there are examples of IBASE craetion with components but not with partner relationships.
    What do I need to fill in the E102CRMXIF_IBASE_PARTNER structure, does anyone have any documentation on this subject?
    Thanks advance!
    Arjan.

    Hi Arjan,
    Do you have any documentation of this process 'Creation of IBASE with the XIF adapter'. Please post it.
    Thanks in advance.
    Sameer Ahamad

Maybe you are looking for

  • Video Podcasts show up as Music

    Here is my problem: I downloaded a couple video podcasts from iTMS and copied them to my ipod. They play fine in iTunes, but on my ipod they dont show up anywhere in the video section, only in the music section. When I 'get info' within iTunes they b

  • Acer Aspire One -- Its protected against bad BIOS Flashes

    I found on the site http://macles.blogspot.com there is a way to flash the system bios of the netbook should something go wrong. It involves a flash drive, renaming a bios bin file and pressing function and escape on bootup.. You might want to go to

  • How do you find who and when for someone who has been uning imessage

    I am trying to be a responsbile parent by trying to see if my son is being sneaky.  I can not find the message through our provider and don't know where to look. 

  • Bat.file in background

    i want to hav a bat. file (matrix) as a background in windows. how do i do it, or should i save the matrix as another format/type? here is the matrix file: @echo off pause color A mode 1000 :matrix echo %random%%random%%random%%random%%random%­%rando

  • Configuration error at launch

    downloaded indesign cc and received configuration error 5 at launch. uninstalled. restarted computer. did a cc clean sweep. launch continues to error. adobe premier pro cc launches w out a problem. note: this is a 30 day trial.