Profitcenter accounting Tcode

hi all,
what is the T-code to find a accounting document details of profit center w.r.t Date or Plant wise report (Just like KSB1 for cost center accounting)???
YK

Hi,
S_ALR_87009712 - Profit Center List: Plan/Actual
S_ALR_87013340 - Profit Center Group: Plan/Actual/Variance
S_ALR_87013326 - Profit Center Group: Plan/Actual/Variance
KE5Z - Profit Center: Actual Line Items
KE5Y - Profit Center: Plan Line Items
2KEE - Profit Center: Totals Records

Similar Messages

  • No receivables and payables are updated in Profitcenter accounting

    Dear All,
    No Account Receivables and payables are getting updated In profit center accounting.
    In 3KEH we need to maintain only the balance sheet accounts? or P&L a/c's also needs to be maintained?
    Please advice,
    Rgds,
    Kumar.

    Hello Anil,
    Please follow the procedure mentioned below to transfer values from AP/ AR to PCA:
    1. Execute F.5D ie. balance sheet readjustment.
    2. Execute F.5E ie. post balanace sheet readjustment
    3. Execute 1KEK ie. transfer valus from FI to PCA
    This should solve the problem.
    PnL accounts should not be maintained in 3KEH. Only Bal Sheet accounts need to be maintained.
    Regards,
    Nisha
    Edited by: Nisha Agrawal on Feb 17, 2008 4:33 PM

  • Error message KI249- Enter only one true account assignment for each cost

    Hi,
    When i released a billing to accounting tcode VF02, i encounterd this message: : You made assignments to several objects in CO( cost center, order, project etc). 2 of these have been created as true cost object.
    1.There is no order assigned to sales order and billing.
    2.Ive defined substitution OKC9 using exit UOKB9.
    3.Ive updated table in OKB9.
    Now, when i do goods receipt (MIGO) to the same cost element with sales order and its item, system does allow to post that without error.
    When debugging, noticed that its looping twice in the cost element and i suspected because of this. Not sure why its looping twice and maybe because looping 1 - in OKB9 and no 2 - substitution.
    Then i removed the substitution, but somehow its looping once but without any cost object ( order or cost center).
    Hope any expert can provide help in this.

    Nice to see that you have taken the initiative to update the forum which is missing with many of forum members and in that sense thanks for the same.
    ps:-  Please spell my name correctly

  • Chart of Accounts Upload

    Hi ,
    I am working on upload of Chart of Accounts. Here I have to upload the Group Chart of Accounts and then the Operational Chart of Accounts( company code level ). Can you please suggest a detailed right approach to do it  ?
    I am currently  using the standard batch input program RFBISA00 through LSMW approach for the purpose. It is loading the operational chart of accounts ( company code level ) fine. But how to upload the Group Chart of Accounts through this same program ? Although the fields to be loaded in Group Chart of Accounts ( tcode - FSPO )  are also  part of the  field list to be loaded in Operational Chart of Accounts ( Tcode - FS01 ) . Is there any problem through this approach ?
    Points Guaranteed for helpful resolutions.

    hi ,
    in fspo wat fields u r trying to populate. i had a requirement where i wasw populating the GBR(legacr a/c for sap g/l account) account note field using fspo transaction.
    i used create_text function module.
    this is for all th g/l accounts for a single company code.

  • GL Account for Spl GL Indicator 'A'

    Hi,
    The users are trying to enter the downpayment in a Vendor's Account using the Spl GL Indicator 'A'. However, the system gives the error message -
    "No special GL Account defined for acct type K sp. G/L Ind. A recon acct 486000".
    To resolve the issue, the message displayed says - In system configuration enter a special GL account corresponding to reconciliation account 486000 for account type K and special G/L Indicator A.
    How to maintain the GL account for Spl GL Indicator A and thru which T Code?
    Your help would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hello Rajjul,
    Creation of special GL account is similar to creation of normal GL account (Tcode FS00). The special GL transaction is configured using tr. code OBYR (Vendor) & OBXR (Customer).
    Ex: if you want to do a special GL transaction for posting downpayment, you have to create a GL account by name 'Downpayment a/c.'. This is the special GL account. Now you have to go to OBYR and select the indicators K and A and click to go inside and first give your normal reconciliation account (vendors) and then the GL account number of the newly created 'downpayment a/c.' Once you save it, you can do the special GL transaction of Downpayment posting using the indicator 'A'. like wise you can create 'N' no. of gl indicators
    Thanks
    Para

  • Field selection for G/L account 893010 not set up

    Hi,
    when iam creating a purchase order with reference of purchase requisition it is showing error as field selection for G/L account 893010 not set up,
    Thanking you,
    sukumar.P

    Hello,
    The field status are set up in two places.
        - on G/L account ( Tcode: FS03 - display, Tcode: OB14 Maintain )
        - on account assignment category in purchasing (Tcode: OME9)
          Both settings must fit to each other. If not, you receive error message ME 045 says that G/L account cannot be used.
          'Earmarked fund' should never be 'Req. Entry in G/L account's field status group setting.
          Because the MIGO document will not store 'earmarked fund' therefore no earmarked fund in accounting document either.
    For further information and guidance, take assistance of FI consultant in your team.
    Thanks & Regards
    JP

  • Maintaining different values for Accounting Type (KOART)

    Hi experts,
    I have several accounting tcodes such as FBV0, FB03, FB08, FV65,FV60 in one parent role.
    FV60, FV65 are added to this role as FBV0 is checking internally for this authorization object. 
    All these tcodes share a same object  F_BKPF_KOA which differ by activity and the accounting type (KOART).
    The KOART field is an org level field defined by SAP and I have entered D,K,S as values.
    But the auth object values should be different for the accounting types.
    i.e  03 for D,K,S
         01,02,03,77  for S
         03,77 for K
    All the derived/child roles for this parent should also have the same document type as the parent. How can I achieve this as this object is maintained at the org level.
    I could not delete this obj from being an org level element as it is defined by SAP.
    Appreciate your response.
    Thanks
    Kee

    > If KOART is an org field you cannot differentiate between authorized activities for each of the KOART values in one role. Whether you maintain values in the parent or not only matters if you're planning to assign the parent roles to users or if you just use them as templates.
    >
    Parent Roles should not be assigned to any users. It should only be used as Template to grant and control Non-Organization Level authorizations centrally (you can see these option in Parent roles). Concept of Parent-Child role is to avoid creating same roles where all authorization field values are exactly same and differs only for Organization Values (different Site / Branch Office specific constants). So we can maintain the Org. levels as different sets for a single Parent role as I already explained.
    For more details:  Note#314513 - PFCG: Maintaining individual organizational levels
    Note#532695 - PFCG: Incorrect organizational level values in derived roles
    >
    > Please elaborate on this one. I think we're running into an urban myth here....
    >
    > Organizational levels are only instruments to assist in building roles. For the final profile it does not matter whether a field is organizational or not. It will not influence the behaviour of the authority-check.
    For the final profile it matters during loading of User authorization data to User Buffer. Think about the Parameter values stored for a particular user. How it behaves for all Objects containing a particular Auth. Field and providing default assignment for that user whenever he tries to perform any action where this field is required to populate.
    If we delete any Object from SU24 proposal then it doesn't mean that the check will not be carried out or the Org. Field contained in that object will not be populated with it's values. I tried to make this clear to the requester.
    Regards,
    Dipanjan
    Edited by: Dipanjan Sanpui on Jun 8, 2009 7:49 AM

  • Mass Load at AO90 - Balance Sheet Accounts

    Hello everyone!
    I need do a mass load of Balance Sheet Accounts (tcode AO90, but a could not mapping its SHDB.'Now I'm looking for Direct Input, BAPI, IDOC, anything... Please, anybody can help me?
    Tks

    Hi,
    You should work with varexits.User inputs one value for  0FISCPER in a var ZFP, single, mandatory.
    then you determine two other variables of type interval for your YTD cumulative BALANCE.
    Depending on which fiscal time IObj you have in your IProvider it may get even easier if you have 0FISCYEAR and 0FISCPER3.
    Please let me know what IObj do you have available and if you need assistance with the ABAP. With Dsource/content are you using? Sometimes even the cumulative balance is available...
    hope this helps...
    Olivier.
    Message was edited by:
            Olivier Cora

  • Locked Contract account can be cleared at Cash Desk

    Dear Experts,
    I have placed a Clearing lock on a Contract Account(tcode CAA2). But the due amounts on that contract account can still be cleared through the cash desk FPCJ.
    Where should the lock be placed to prevent all incoming payments for a particular contract account?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Malini

    HI ,
    In the view SM30 - V_TFK000S , should have the specification - Posting and clearing lock .
    Secondly the same has to be applied in the contract account in the payment lock reason .
    After assigning the same , system would not allow to accept payment against any document or even payment on account .
    Only thing that you have to remember is that the lock reason should have both payment as well as clearing lock .
    The other way is of pushing the locks in the documents through FPE2 or FPE2M , else the lock at contract account would work.
    Cheers ,
    Dewang

  • BAPI Create Contract Account in Module PSCD

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement create Contract Account (TCode CAA1) in module PSCD by BAPI.
    I use BAPI : BAPI_CTRACCONTRACTACCOUNT_CR1.
    I set value for some required parameters and Perform BAPI, i receive 2 error messages in RETURN parameter :
    - Enter a value in field Account Determ. ID
    - Enter a value in field Payment Terms
    I don't know where to set value for Account Determ.ID and Payment Terms in BAPI.
    I searched description of BAPI parameters but there is no BAPI parameter suitable.
    I also searched on this forum but no topic found.
    Pls help,
    Thank.
    nvsinh.

    Hi all,
    The problem is solved.
    The proplem comes from release version of ECC6.
    Thanks all,
    Sinhto

  • Creating Profit Center Accounts

    Hi,
    I am looking to create accounts in PCA. We have one company code, controlling area, so I am looking to have the same accounts/cost elements in PCA as in our chart of accounts.
    Can someone tell me how to create the accounts/cost elements in PCA. I could see two transactions KE5B and KE61. These are looking for financial statement version and cost element groups to copy from. My questions are
    1. Is it necessary that we have all the accounts in a financial statement version to copy them over to PCA using KE5B, or is it possible to copy the chart of accounts directly to PCA.
    2.  I see that plans and actuals are recorded againts accounts in PCA. Then, why do we need to have cost elements in PCA?
    3. Are KE5B/KE61 the only transactions to create/assign accounts to PCA? Do we need to do anything in config to assign accounts to PCA.
    Thanks for your help.
    Ram

    Hi Ram
    Would like to share my views on the above
    In PCA we can create accounts and accounts groups.  The cost elements created in CCA can be created as accounts in PCA.  These accounts / account groups can be used in PCA for PCA assessment cycles.  So, GL expense items which are represented as cost elements in CCA are represented in PCA as accounts.
    There are three sets of books maintained – GL – Financial Books of accounts, CCA – cost accounting records, and PCA.  PCA books are maintained in ledger 8A.  We come across this ledger when we customize reports thru report painter where in most of the customized reports, I have considered parameters of 8A ledger references viz, controlling area, company code, currency etc although they are same – these records are also transferred to 8A ledger in PCA.
    Would like to share my experience wherein I have done planning in PCA with creation of accounts and account groups
    1)Planning for material consumption accounts PC wise – T code 7KE1
    2)Planning for COGS – PC wise – Tcode :  7KE1
    3)Planning for sales – PC wise – T Code : 7KE1
    4)Planning for inventories which are also created as accounts - Tcode : 7KE3
    The above planning can be manually entered or integrated thru excel planning or uploaded thru excel files.  We have various options available
    1)  The reason to do the above planning was to have PC wise Planned P&L. 
    2)  To ensure cost center planning values are posted to PC’s executed TCode
          1KE0 – CO Plan Data under Plan data transfer.  This transfers cost center plan data to PC’s assigned in cost center master data record
    3)  Once above planning parameters are completed, PC assessment cycles were run for transferring expenses within PC’s.  These expenses could be viz, Marketing costs, Corporate costs and Adm costs which are not allocated or assessed thru cost center assessments
    4)  To have above planning process, defined separate SKF’s for PCA assessments which formed as basis of allocation for expense transfer within PCA.  Ex; Sales qty, etc
    5)  With the above data flow – customized PCA reports were created thru report painter for plan and actual values and variances. 
    Manaul Planning process was carried out for all elements was done in PCA since other planning tools Integrated Planning – LTP and SOP were not within the scope.  If those tools were enables and certain planner profiles and forecasting profiles were created and data is transferred and integrated from either COPA or sales / logistics planning to SOP.  SOP planned values are considered at all levels of planning covering, CCP, Activity planning, product costing, internal orders and finally profit planning is derived. 
    Where these planning tools are not there, PCA planning as mentioned was followed. 
    Appreciate if someone can confirm / correct my understanding on the above process.  Looking forward for comments

  • Accounts were not properly valuated at month-end rate

    We ran valuation and we descovered that some accounts which were not properly valuated at month-end rate such as:
    12701000 A/R Employees,
    12801000 Rec Other,
    23002000 Accounts Payable Trade,
    25041000 Accrued Payroll,
    25046000 Accrued Federal Payroll Tax.
    These accounts are setup the sameway as all other accounts, any help will be appreciated - thanks Al

    Hi Vyas,
    Check some of the following for the impacted accounts:
    Tcode OB59 config for val method.
    settings for the GL account master data under "Control Data" tab:
        Account currency
        Exchange rate difference key
    Flag: only balances in local currency
    Hope this helps
    Ajay

  • 4KE1 - Profit Center Allocations

    Hi Experts,
    We are using New GL functionality and we are doing cost / revenue allocations via tcode 4KE1. However the values allocated are not updated in GL accounts (FI). Please guide me where could be a possible problem. This is required since we need updated valuations at the time of Financial statements generated based on profit center wise.
    Regards
    Mustafa Sakerwala

    Hi Mustafa,
    Have a look where you are making these postings. In some cases sumariazition is set up for the posting to FI. Like when you have 200 SD postings on 10 different G/L account the FI posting is perhaps only 10 lines when this is set up in sumarization. See transaction 0KE8 Maintain Document Summarization, there are more places (transactions to set this up)
    Then you have to set up the FI posting as like G/l - profitcenter accounting.
    When this is not working you can set up a FI substitution that read 4KE1
    First wy you want to have the profit center in FI. Profitcenter reporting you are doing in PCA (sub ledger) and not in FI

  • PCA Manual Posting - Open/close posting periods

    All,
    Is there a way you can open or close PCA posting periods? The FI posting period control does not control the PCA manual posting. We need however to do this. Is there a way to do it. I know I can create a validation. But is there any other way?
    Regards,

    Hello,
    here is the one and only correct answer for your question:
    Unfortunately, there is no possibility to lock periods / posting
    transactions in PCA (including distributions).
    There are only two possibilities to prevent postings to profit centers:
    1. is to completely lock them in the master data via transaction KE52 (tab 'Indicators' -> activate 'Lock indicator'. Please read also the F1-help here for the field 'Lock indicator')
    2. to lock one complete fiscal year in the entire Profit-Center
       Accounting via transaction 1KEF.
    One important reason is that PCA receives its postings from preliminary applications like MM, CO, FI. Therefore, postings can only be locked in those applications (like in FI via TN OB52 or in CO via TN OKP1 or FI-SL via GCP1), but not directly in PCA.
    Excpetions from that are described in the SAP notes 436384 and´836218 for manual postings made with transactions 1KEL and 9KE0. With the coding corrections of the both notes a period lock is possible for these two transactions.
    It is not planned to have a general functionality of period locks in Profitcenter Accounting. PCA should be always open for postings. It is designed to be the receiving application of data delivered by the preliminary applications. Therefore period locks must be handled / maintained also in those applications.
    Best regards,
    Andreas

  • Error in VF02?

    Hi,
    When I am trying to post the accounting document in VF02 while releasing the billing document generated I am getting the error "u201CNo account is specified in item 0000001002
    Message no. F5670
    Diagnosis
    No account was specified for account type "S" in item "0000001002" of the FI/CO document.
    System Response
    The Financial Accounting program cannot process the document.
    Procedure
    A system error has probably occurred in the application you called up. Check the data transferred to item "0000001002" of the FI/CO document.u201D
    I have assigned the G/L accounts to the S. Org. and COA with ERS, ERL and MWS. but still I am getting the same error.
    Please help as I am not an SD guy and trying to do the excise part in SD.
    Please suggest  with full details...
    Thanks and Regards
    Nitin

    Few things you can check
    1. Account Key against the condition type in pricing procedure.
    2. Check assignment of GL account against the Account keys ERL, ERS & ERF in TCode VKOA and Tax related account keys, like MWS in OB40.
    3. Check the GL Account(TCode FS00) used in above assignment or take help of FI team member in your team.
    4. Also check TCode OMSY entries for open and close posting period for account type 'S'.
    Regards
    JP

Maybe you are looking for