Properly indexed

Problem in my blogg
[spam link removed]
"Flash content has been detected on this page.
Flash should only be used for specific enhancements. Although Flash content often looks nicer, it cannot be properly indexed by search engines. Avoid full Flash websites to maximize SEO."
Is there any way fix this if I want to use flash content on my blog?

This isn't really a Flash Player question but a web design/SEO question.
Embedded Flash content appears to a search engine "spider" as this:
<object>[all the accompanying data]</object>
EVERYTHING inside the [ and ] is INVISIBLE. People build entire sites in a Flash container and the wonder WHY they have pi$$ poor rankings with Google, Yahoo and Bing to name a few.
Add to this the FACT that smartphones, and tablets (Android) CAN'T and DON'T run Flash, and you've alienated a whole new genre of potential visitors to your site.
HTML5 has the ability to embed M4V, MPEG, AVI and a few other formats of video content that are visible UNIVERSALLY. Flash is a dying format... it has about two years at best before it's obsolete.
Ask in the Dreamweaver forum. People there like Nancy O, Murray Summers, Mark Hollis, John Waller and others will tell you that Flash content, especially Flash content you hope to use for SEO purposes, is a BAD BAD BAD idea anymore.

Similar Messages

ODC - Import Server Failing "not properly indexed"

I've install ODC 10.1351.1 along with import server, trying to import files from a folder.
Under "Batch Job Settings", "Folder/File List Provider", I'm selecting the "Import from folder" option. I am NOT creating a list file. I've provided a file cabinet as part of the setup, and I'm trying to use Commit Server to do the commits.
When I execute the job in Import Server, my test tif file gets renamed as expected, but my batch does not get committed. In the logs, I see the following error:
Event: 1223
***Warning*** Batch OCCIT0913113350855 was not committed because it was not properly indexed.
I do see the batch job if I go to the Commit Server UI and look at the batch list. I could review the items in Commit Server. However, I'm looking to just simply load the folder and auto-commit the items. Am I off base, or do I need more setup? The documentation is not terribly clear here.
Thanks for any insight,
William

You are missing an indexing step, which can't be done automatically without the Recognition server (or manual indexing). ODC manual explains briefly on the 34th page:
Import Server, which imports images and other electronic documents directly into Capture from sources such as email, FTP sites, network folders, list files, and fax providers. As images and electronic documents are imported, they are converted into Capture batches where they can be indexed using Index or Recognition Server and then committed.
I use import server only for importing network folder scans and assigning them to the appropriate batch for manual indexing, so can't give you an elaborated advice.
Regards,
Boris
Edited by: tombo on 2011.09.14 01:21

Outlook 2013 not properly indexing shared contacts

I'm having an issue where Outlook 2013 does not appear to be properly indexing most shared contacts. These contacts can be found using the "advanced
find", but this is a bit cumbersome and not the desired solution since this is a feature we use to use very frequently in Outlook 2010 without issue. More details:
Account is Office365
Connected via domain
Contacts shared via GAB
An advice would be appreciated. Thanks.

Hi,
Since they can be found in “advanced find”, I believe the index on the Exchange side is fine. You may also ask this question on Outlook forum:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/home?category=officeitpro#forum=outlook&filter=alltypes&sort=lastpostdesc&content=Search
Regards,
Simon Wu
TechNet Community Support

How can I properly index mpeg2 (from Newtek's 3Play) in Premeire CS5?

I'm trying to drop mpeg2 files from NewTek's 3Play system into a Premiere or AfterEffects timeline. They do not index properly. The
files play back in Media Player, and I can encode them in Adobe Media Encoder (however, they're absolutely dreadful in their playback, no matter how I encode them). NewTek insists I'm the only person in the entire world with this issue. I have all the updates for my Adobe products in place, but can't figure it out.

Can you confrim that you're running Premiere Pro CS5 (5.0.2) and After Effects CS5 (10.0.1)? Those updates fixed some problems with MPEG-2 indexing.
If you imported these assets before updating, then you'll need to clear the media cache of these index files to force re-indexing.

Logic taking eternity to re-index loops!

Hi, I just moved some files from my system HD to an external drive to save space.
When I dropped them to the Loop Browser to reindexing on this new location it take several hours to do that. Like the whole night!
The Progress bar don't show the current position.
What I'm doing wrong?

Eriksimon wrote:
Wrong! Spotlight is not involved in making the Loop Index for the Loop Browser. Proof: I just turned OFF spotlight and reindexed 12 gig of loops in under 3 minutes after that.
The the OP: Have you really deleted ALL index files? Especially this one
YourHD/Users/'you'/Library/Audio
Try to reindex one folder at a time.
Also: What happens if you drag just one loop (from the external) to the index?
Is other data traffic between the external and your machine ok?
Let me know,
regards, Erik.
Message was repeatedly edited by: Eriksimon
Hi Erik Sorry for taking too long for reply, had weekend concerts and got to be away from my Mac.
When I drag one file to the Loop browser it is copied to the system folder and gets properly indexed.
When I try to drag one folder, no luck!
Yes, I'm sure I deleted all index files from the system HD.
I read on other forum that when you are using a laptop you must have all your files on the system Hard drive. Is this right?
How can I turn off Spotlight?
best
Depalm

Why my iweb website is no longer getting indexed by google?

I have had my website for 2 years and it was showing up on google with no problems. Now my site is not showing up on google and I dont know why.
I have verified the site, I have resubmitted the URL. I have requested reconsideration, but I just need to know why my site that stop showing up on google.
.Google mention that .mac blocks googlebots from indexing the site. What should I do to fix this probelm. (url:www.noticemagazine.com)

In order for search engines to find your site you need to have text content. They don't know what your site is about if there is no text content on it. I have went through your site and you should do the following;
1) Get ride of your "click here to enter site" page (the Welcome_.html page)
Never EVER use your default page in this way. This is called a splash page and provides no value to your visitors since they need an additional click to find your page and it provides no indication to search engines about what your site is all about. Your default page is the most important page on your site, use it to link to the most important pages on your website and to have your important keywords.
2) Your title tags NEED to have your most important keywords
Your title tags (what you see at the top of your browser) need to have your most important keywords . They should be 60-120 characters long, unique for every single page and describe what your page is all about. This is one of the most important things for search engines. Not only do they use this to learn about your website content but its also what users will see when your site is listed in Google's result. Do you think someone will click a link called 'Welcome' when they do a search in Google, or "Notice Magazine: Lifestyle and Fashion Advice" (for example).
3) You need more text content
All of your pages are mostly images, you need more content that search engines can properly index. Imagine you were searching for text in a Word Document and it was just an image, you wouldn't find anything. This is basically what Google does too. Most of your text has been converted to images because you use non standard fonts in iWeb. In iWeb, open the fonts palette, and select 'Web'. Stick to those fonts.
4) Link to other pages on your site using your keywords
You need to link between your pages on your site using keywords you want to be found with. Anchor text (the text you click to follow a link), is used by Google to rank your website. Tip: Do a search for click here in Google, look at the top result and notice that click here is not found anywhere on that page. Its because so many people link to that first result using the term 'click here'. (Its Adobe Reader's page for those that do not want to search).
5) Get a real domain name AND real hosting
MobileMe is NOT meant for commercial sites and should never be used for it. A real host with a real domain name (that includes your keywords) you will outrank the same website hosted in MobileMe (even with domain forwarding. Any kind of domain forwarding is not ideal for search engines because of how redirects are handled).
6) Create and submit an XML Sitemap file
Not only will this help with you rankings, Google/Yahoo/Bing provide a Webmaster Tools account that will provide feedback on why your site may not be in Google.
7) Speed up your website
You are using too many high quality images on your site which is making it extremely slow. Reduce the quality of your images and optimize your HTML/CSS/Javascript code so it loads faster. Not only does this provide a bad user experience for your visitors but Google will not index a slow loading page as much as a faster loading page. Also, Google announced just a few days ago that the speed of a website's load time WILL become an important ranking factor in the VERY NEAR future.
Having a real web host will help with the speed issue.
8) Redo your navigation bar using text and include your keywords in each link. iWeb's javascript navigation bar does not allow search engines to easily find all your pages on your site.
9) Get links from third party websites. Post on forums, use twitter, facebook, blogs and other social networking sites. Links from other websites are a very important factor for how well your website ranks.

Not Using Index on File Server When Accessing User Files Directly on Server

It appears to me that on a server with an indexed network share (Desktop Experience and Search Indexing roles/features installed), if you access the share directly on the server using its drive path, you can search the folders using the index, which
is much faster and supports finding words inside of the files in seconds). However, if you access the same shared folder via its network path from the server itself, the server ignores the index. I have this experience/problem across all shared folders on
the Windows 2012 R2 Server. Details and my most specific goal follows.
In addition to a laptop, I frequently work directly on a Windows Server 2012 R2 computer. We have Redirected Folders set up on DFS (for failover redundancy) so that my Documents folder is in:
\\network\redirections\user\documents. This all works fine on Windows 7 and 8 client computers connected to the network via Offline Files.
The problem is on the server itself. The server has Desktop Experience enabled and Windows Search is installed. If I navigate manually through the DFS root folder to my documents folder, I can search and it properly uses the index. This proves the location
is properly indexed. However, if I access the folders through the official "Documents" folder from the Folder Redirection (a network share pointing to the same server computer I'm working on), it performs an un-indexed search (slow and ignores file
contents, but does find files eventually if the search term is in their filename). Is there a way to force the server to use the indexed search on the Redirected Folders (my Documents folder in particular) when working on that server when logged in locally
on that server?
I suspect a workaround would be to go into the Registry and manually change the HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders to point to the local DFS folder instead of the network share name, but at least one problem
with this is then if I save files with links to other files (e.g., a linked Excel table in a PowerPoint, a mail merge to Access database in Word, etc.) on the server computer, those links will point to d:\DFSroot\... (a physical drive on the computer) instead
of \\network\redirections\user\... (a universally accessible network path) and so none of the other computers will be able to find the linked files, defeating one of the
major benefits of using Redirected Folders.
I can't believe that I need to choose between indexed searching and proper path names in saved files. Surely there is a way to use an indexed search on the server itself?
If you need any more info to help me troubleshoot, please let me know.
Thanks for any help,
Colin

Hi Colin,
It seems that we can not use indexed search on DFS shares. Windows Search works well when users directly access the server. That is, the server is not made available through Distributed File System (DFS).
For more detailed information, you could refer to the links below:
Windows Search Service, Clustered File Services, DFS, Win7 Libraries
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/31ac4c16-948b-4ca4-b18f-3a339cdfd5b9/windows-search-service-clustered-file-services-dfs-win7-libraries?forum=winserverfiles
Windows Browse and Organize Features
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd744693(WS.10).aspx
Best Regards,
Mandy
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected]

Configuring Index server 5.x and Acrobat 9.x IFilter

Hello,
I've recently upgrade from Adobe PDF IFilter 6.0 to Acrobat Reader 9.4. From my understanding, the IFilter will be automatically installed when I install Acrobat Reader 9.4. However, this does not seem to be the case as our index services do not appear to be properly indexing PDF files now. I'm on a Windows 2003 SP2 Standard Edition (32 bit) and we are using Index Service 5.x. How do I get Index service to use the new IFilter? I have checked the registry key, "[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\ContentIndex\DLLsToRegister", and manually put in the location of the new IFilter but nothing seems to work. Anyone have any idea???
Thanks

If you:
1) create a folder (eg. Struts_Trial) under the Catalina_Home\webapps
2) add an index.jsp
You then need to add a folder called WEB-INF in webapps/Struts_Trial/
In here put a file called web.xml that looks like:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>
<!DOCTYPE web-app
    PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN"
    "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd">
<web-app>
<display-name>Test</display-name>
<description>
     Test
</description>
<welcome-file-list>
    <welcome-file/>
</welcome-file-list>
</web-app>Now restart tomcat and you should be able to access the page by going to:
http://localhost:8080/Struts_Trial/index.jsp
(if you are running tomcat on port 8080)

Selecting all columns makes oracle use more indexes than only selectng one?

I have 3 queries here that differ only slightly, conceptually, but the plans are massively different. What I cant work out is that the difference is only in the select list.. The fields referenced in the where clause are properly indexed for this purpose
SELECT
scc.expiry_date
FROM
bw3.int_file_log_details ifld
INNER JOIN
bw3.svc_card_status_change scsc
USING
    (institution_number, file_number)
INNER JOIN bw3.svc_client_cards scc
USING
    (card_number)
WHERE
institution_number = '00000001' AND
file_number = '00002504'This one above does a full table scan of SCC, over 3.5 million records
SELECT
card_number
FROM
bw3.int_file_log_details ifld
INNER JOIN
bw3.svc_card_status_change scsc
USING
    (institution_number, file_number)
INNER JOIN bw3.svc_client_cards scc
USING
    (card_number)
WHERE
institution_number = '00000001' AND
file_number = '00002504'This one above does an index fast full scan of SCC's pk (which is cardnumber), as does doing a "SELECT null as dummy FROM..."
SELECT
FROM
bw3.int_file_log_details ifld
INNER JOIN
bw3.svc_card_status_change scsc
USING
    (institution_number, file_number)
INNER JOIN bw3.svc_client_cards scc
USING
    (card_number)
WHERE
institution_number = '00000001' AND
file_number = '00002504'This one above does the index range scan of the columns mentioned in the where clause and two index unique scans to link in IFLD and SCC (because they are joined on their PKs)
I would expect all queries to run this way and completes in ~0.01 seconds
Now, I get that oracle will sometimes use only an index instead of a table access when the requested data can be got from the index, but the actual query is pulling data from some columns not in indexes, so must be accessed in the table:
SELECT
scsc.card_prod_data as "Field1",
substr(card_number,1,4)||' '||
    substr(card_number,5,4)||' '||
    substr(card_number,9,4)||' '||
    substr(card_number,13,4)||' '||
    substr(card_number,17) as "Field2",
'                           ' as "Field3",
scc.emboss_line_1 as "Field4",
scc.emboss_line_2 as "Field5",
TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(scc.last_issued_date, 'YYYYMMDD'), 'MM/YY ')||
    TO_CHAR(TO_DATE(scc.expiry_date, 'YYYYMMDD'), 'MM/YY ')||
    '    ' as "Field6",
'B'||
    card_number||
    '^'||
    RPAD('0', 27, ' ')||
    '^'||
    to_char(to_date(scc.expiry_date, 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYMM')||
    service_category_code||
    '000000000000' as "Field7",
card_number||
    '='||
    to_char(to_date(scc.expiry_date, 'YYYYMMDD'), 'YYMM')||
    service_category_code||
    '000000000000' as "Field8",
card_number as "Field9",
scsc.cvv_cvc2 as "Field10"
FROM
bw3.int_file_log_details ifld
INNER JOIN
bw3.svc_card_status_change scsc
USING
    (institution_number, file_number)
INNER JOIN bw3.svc_client_cards scc
USING
    (card_number)
WHERE
institution_number = '00000001' AND
file_number = '00002504'This query above, which uses some data from all tables, does a table full scan of SCC, yet if I SELECT * FROM.. I get the expected index usage and table access by index rowid for all tables..
Why is oracle doing an FTS when I choose only some columns, yet doing index access when I select * ?
Edited by: charred on Oct 5, 2010 11:37 AM

Selectivity of indexes?
For a query linking these tables:
int_file_log_details <-> svc_card_status_change <-> svc_client_cards
I'm expecting Oracle to:
Use an index range scan of the index on svc_card_status_change that is a nonunique index of institution_number and file number. Selectivity of this index is:
1 institution number in the entire table
59 distinct file numbers in the entire table
4.1million records in the entire table
From there, with the records it found, to use index unique scan of the PKs of int_file_log_details (file_number: 1 record required) and PK of svc_client_cards (card_number: poetntially thousands of records required)
I can understand if oracle might decide it can get 69k records out of 4.1 million faster by FTS the cards table rather than having the indirection of the index... what I cannot understand is:
If I select all the data from the query (SELECT *) it does unique index scans for the 2 records
If I select say, only one non-indexed non-joined column from each table, oracle prefers a FTS of the cards table..
Is oracle not realising that there are only 2 records I need out of cards? Why would select * differ? Is it that oracle thinks "select * is a large amount of data, so it'll be faster to use the index and target certain rows" vs "select one_column can be garnered more quickly by scanning the table and generating a lower overall memory load" ?

Google index external HTML data sets?

I know one of the workarounds to have Google properly index
dynamic content is to use HTML data sets, but I'm unclear about one
thing. Does this only work if you have the HTML data set table on
the same page you use it with, or does it also work with external
HTML data sets?
For instance, will Google have a problem indexing if I use a
external HTML data set like:
<script type="text/javascript">

</script>
<div spry:region="educationLinks" id="linksContainer"
class="SpryHiddenRegion">
<ul spry:repeatchildren="educationLinks"
class="unorderedLinkList">
<li><a href="{url}"
target="_blank">{name}</a> - {description}</li>
</ul>

</div>

I'm doing the same exact thing using external HTML data sets
instead of XML. It is true that spiders will not index the external
page based on the Spry data you noted. My solution will be to
create a sitemap.xml page and submit it to the search engines. That
sitemap.xml file will contain all the pages in your site and the
spiders will use it as a central point to crawl all of those pages
specified within. So, I will just include my externally referenced
files in the sitemap.xml file.
Checkout
http://www.sitemap.org for more
information on that.

No pdf indexing

Hi, I'm using CTXSYS.CONTEXT with URL_DATASTORE. All other parameters are left unspecified (defaults).
While plain text docs appear properly indexed, pdf are not. They appear unfiltered, the index contains pdf keywords only.
I understood that by default auto_fillter should enter the game in this case and pdf docs should be recognized as such.
What's wrong ? Thanks.

Although, according to the documentation, ctxsys.auto_filter is the default, so you should not have to specify it, I have found that in some versions, explicitly specifying it as an index parameter makes a difference.
You need to make sure that the auto_filter supports your PDF versions and operating system and version and Oracle version and edition. You also need to make sure there isn't any password protecting the PDF or any special PDF features that prevent filtering. These things are listed in the documentation and are different for different versions.
There have been a lot of changes to filtering and there are some patches.
What is your Oracle version and edition?
What is your operating system and version?
What is/are the PDF versions?
Can you filter a simple PDF document without anything special, just a single sentence for testing?

Using hint index

Hi,
At use of hint /*+INDEX */,
optimizer use costbased approach for all session and not just for the given query.
Is it possible to avoid it.
Thank.

Bumping up to see if anyone has a definitive answer on this topic.
The sample create statement is as follows:
CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW VW_BOOLA
AS
SELECT /*+ INDEX(BOOLA, INDXBOOLA_CTX_ID) */
ID, DESCRIPTION
FROM BOOLA;
If I create a view using my CTX index as a HINT, will it limit the records retrieved to only those that have been properly indexed by INDXBOOLA_CTX_ID which runs every hour?
Thanks again.

Spotlight selectively stops indexing

So after a massive desktop reorganization, after which I'd finally have just the one folder wherewith spotlight would help make everything clutter-free, I noticed a good deal of what I'd recently moved wasn't turning up in searches.
Looking up some possibly solutions for indexing problems, I did the standard add/remove HD, and after reindexing, twice, now it's showing less than ever before, searching what appears to only be music, mail and dictionary entries. Folders are sometimes included, though only if I'd physically opened myself. It's just too frustrating for words, especially after having spent a day planning the entire new setup around it.
I've seen some other possible remedies but I don't really want to start doing sudo stuff without knowing exactly what I'm doing.
Any other suggestions???

Try this. Click on the Desktop, CMD+F, click on Kind button, select Other, drill down to File invisible, check it, continue down to System files, check it, and click OK. Now, click on + button, click on the left-hand item and select System files and select are included, click on the plus button, click on the left-hand item and select File visibility and select visible or invisible, select File Name, save the search, drag its icon to the Dock, and use to search your entire Mac—currently starts with By Name, but Contents is available. I use this instead of CMD+F or CMD+spacebar for all searches.
If that finds all of your stuff, then it's properly indexed. If not, then come back and I'll give you the simple CLI commands to reindex.

Improperly Indexed Footage/Timecode Problem

Hey everyone,
Recently I deleted all the temporary render files in my premiere pro media cache folder to free up space on my mac hard drive. This unfortunate action somehow prevented me from opening my premiere project file. I have wiped my entire drive and reinstalled the creative suite to try and get it open, and now I am able to get my project file open, but everything has been somehow corrupted.
So here's my problem... I believe that the premiere is unable to read the footage file's timecode because all my edits are out of sync, both the audio and the video. The sequences are all still put together properly, every shot and every audio clip is the right length and in the right place, but it's drawing the source from the wrong point on the captured tape. So to illustrate, as I play a sequence, not only is it playing audio from earlier or later on the tape than the point I specified, but the video is coming from the wrong point as well. The audio and video are not even from the same incorrect place on the tape! I've examined the footage in the source monitor and have discovered that although the audio and video are initially in sync, they slip out of sync as the clip goes along. I assume this is part of the problem, and it's one I've read about, but it isn't manifesting in the timeline in any way I am familiar with.
I have tried importing the footage in a new project file and have had the same problem. I have tried selecting "replace footage" in my initial project file to no avail. I have also tried opening various older versions and backups of my project and have had the same problem. The issue is clearly with the captured footage and premiere's ability to properly index it. When I deleted the render files, I must have deleted something that premiere creates when you capture footage that it needs to getting everything to sync up.
Can anyone think of a way I can get my project working properly again? Any help would be much appreciated.
My specs: I'm operating Premiere Pro CS4 on my Macbook Pro running OSX 10.6.2 Snow Leopard with 4 GB of RAM. My footage is all 1440x1080p at 24fps in mpeg format. The mpeg file plays fine outside of premiere.

Hi... I am using the latest version of FCP. I have 1GB of memory on the 17" only 720 mb on the 12".
Odd that things work for the 12" and not for the 17". I should be getting the 12" back today from apple, so I guess the 17" goes back to the closit.
Guess I will have to free up some room if I want to use the 17" with FCP. What a hassel!
Mike

Index Firefox history for Spotlight search?

I've searched these message boards and other sites for the answer to the following question. Can I include my Firefox history (visited websites) in the indexed Spotlight search results?
I read something about Safari history being saved as a different file type so that Spotlight could properly index. I'd imagine that a script to do the same for Firefox page history would be able to achieve the same result, no?
If anyone could provide some insight into this, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Thanks.

I found the solution by myself: the preference panel 'Localization' seemed to have corrupted settings; by changing these the settings were restored, and now Spotlight is working as it should.

Properly indexed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for