Property Based Rule - Backward compatibility

We have the following structure in a Model.
Decimal Feature A
Decimal Feature B
Option Feature C (min 0 , Max - no value)
Option 1 - Property X : 100 , Prop Y : 200
Option 2 - Property X : 200 , Prop Y : 300
Option 3 - Property X : 300 , Prop Y : 400
Option 4 - Property X : 400 , Prop Y : 500
Option 5 - Property X : 500 , Prop Y : 600
Options in 'Option Feature C' are being selected based upon values in Decimal Feat A and B. Example, if the user keys in a value between 200 to 300 in Decimal A , and a value between 300 to 400 in Decimal B, then thru property based rules Option 2 and Option 3 are selected automatically.
Now along with the above logic we want an additional logic which enforces the backward compatibility too.
i.e. if the user selects Option 2 and Option 3 then one of the decimal feature should have a value between 200 to 300 and another decimal deature should have a value between 300 to 400.
Any thoughts on this can be done without using an extension ?
If an extension is required then what can be the best approach to accomplish this.

Hi Akhil -
I am working on our forum backlog. Please let me know if this is still an issue for you.
Regards,
Daniel

Similar Messages

Backwards Compatibility mapper module was not able to start

Hi ,
We have an issue with our SCOM 2012 agents not getting discovered because the Backwards Compatibility mapper module was not able to start.
I checked few blogs and could see the remediation for SCOM 2007 SP1.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/mariussutara/archive/2008/03/11/backwards-compatibility-mapper-fails-to-start-event-on-opsmgr-2007-sp1.aspx
These are in the DMZ zone and are manually installed. i have bounced the health service folder as remediation but still looks the same.
For test i have set the mssing NetBios name for the server and restarted the service. Still the server is not getting discovered and shows the below error.
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: HealthService
Date: 12/8/2014 6:13:23 PM
Event ID: 1103
Task Category: Health Service
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: Server.cc.domain
Description:
Summary: 1 rule(s)/monitor(s) failed and got unloaded, 1 of them reached the failure limit that prevents automatic reload. Management group "MG Group name". This is summary only event, please see other events with descriptions of unloaded rule(s)/monitor(s).
Log Name: Operations Manager
Source: Health Service Modules
Date: 12/8/2014 6:13:23 PM
Event ID: 10720
Task Category: None
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: N/A
Computer: Server.cc.domain
Description:
The Backwards Compatibility mapper module was not able to start because discovery has not fully completed for this Health Service. This is a transient issue, the affected rule(s) will be unloaded and the Health Service will restart them when initialization
is complete.
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: System.Mom.BackwardCompatibility.ServiceStateMonitoring
Instance name: Server.cc.domain
Instance ID: {E0B732FD-3908-E52B-2EAD-813F42F0C48E}
Management group: MG Group name
Jesty Sam

Hi Jesty,
Based on the Article it seems to be for SCOM 2007 SP1.
And as you mentioned you are using SCOM 2007 R2. I see that Microsoft has fixed this issue about the article you have mentioned above.
Below is the article from MS for that.
951380 Some
computer properties for a cluster node may not be collected by the discovery process in System Center Operations Manager 2007 Service Pack 1
Check the below link where MS has mentioned it has fixed this issue in SCOM 2007 R2.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/971410
So i dont think it is necessary for
you to install this Hotfix
Gautam.75801

An error occcurred on line 105 while executing script 'MOM Backward Compatibility Service State Monitoring Script"

We've been getting the following error for some time now.
An error occurred on line 105 while executing script 'MOM Backward Compatibility Service State Monitoring Script'
Source: Microsoft VBScript runtime error
Description: The remote server machine does not exist or is unavailable: 'GetObject'
One or more workflows were affected by this.
Workflow name: System.Mom.BackwardCompatibility.ServiceStateMonitoring
Instance name: server.domain.local
Instance ID: {INSTANCE}
Management group: GROUP
Unfortunately the instance in question has since been decommissioned and simply does not exist any more.
We're currently on a repeat count of over 350,000 and I would REALLY like to get it stopped. I've had a look at adding an override but that points to the management server rather than the instance itself.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
thanks in advance!

Hi Steven,
There are for option for us to override a monitor ot rule:
For all objects of class:
Class
When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply to all objects in the class at which the rule or monitor is targeted.
For a group
When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to members of the group. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all objects in the targeted class except for those objects that are also members
of the group used for the override.
When you create a group, you save it to an unsealed management pack. However, an element in an unsealed management pack, such as an override, cannot reference an element in a different unsealed management pack, such as a group. If you are going to use a group
to limit the application of an override, you must either save the group to the same unsealed management pack as the override, or you must seal the management pack that contains the group.
For a specific object of class:
Class
When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to the specified object. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all other objects in the targeted class.
For all objects of another class
When you select this option for your override, the override settings apply only to objects of a class other than the targeted class. The rule or monitor without the override settings continues to apply to all objects in the targeted class.
Did you try to override it for a specific object of class?
Regards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

InDesign Backwards Compatibility in CS5 an MAJOR issue

I am a print designer who works in InDesign. I bought CS3 Design Premium in late summer of 2008. Shortly thereafter CS4 came out, but after just having forked out a big chunk of change, I decided against upgrading to CS4 right away. Recently I considered upgrading but then heard CS5 was coming out so I decided to postpone the upgrade and wait for the new software. I've just checked out the trial version of CS5 InDesign and after speaking with Adobe Support have come to the conclusion that I can't upgrade to CS5. Why? BACKWARDS compatibility to CS3. The previously offered export features that supplied a path for backwards compatibility via an .inx file are gone.
I design freelance for a lot of different customers and once the design is complete, I have to deliver the InDesign file along with all associated fonts ad images to my clients. Most of my clients are still on CS3. If I upgrade to CS5 I will instantly not be able to work for 2/3 of my clients, as I will have no means by which to save a file backwards to CS3. I was informed by Adobe support that I would need to buy CS4 and CS5, as I could save my CS5 file in the IDML format and open it in CS4 and then I could save the file from CS4 as an INX file and open that is CS3. ARE THEY INSANE??? First off that requires keeping 3 version of InDesign up and running on my machine all of the time and secondly, why should I have to buy CS4 when I'm paying an additional fee to upgrade to CS5 because I didn't upgrade from CS4? This is so screwed up that it has to be an oversight---please tell me there is a patch in the works!!!
PS- I've never posted to a forum before, so if I have broken any rules of forum etiquette or offended in any way, I offer my apologies now and if I (and the Adobe Support staff I spoke to) have overlooked something, please enlighten me!

Cynthia Ryan Graphic wrote:
I am all for working with better workflow practices and I understand that saving files backwards is less than ideal but Adobe needs to look at the real world uses of their software as well. I have to work with firms that aren't upgrading now--especially with the economy we are now in--and most of the items I design for them are ads-- one page- nothing too complex--really nothing fancy. I obviously wouldn't save a book or a very complex document backwards in this way, but simple things have translated just fine in the past. In the real world we hit situations like this.
I bought my software 21 months ago and in this time Adobe has expected me to upgrade twice--I haven't even finished expensing the initial cost of the software on my books yet. Upgrading that often just can't happen in a small firm--it's prohibitively expensive for a one man shop.
So now from what I understand, to do this properly, I am supposed to buy the upgrade and keep both versions running on my machine and track with every client which version of the software I need to be working in. What happens when I have to add an employee? I will have to buy the CS3 version of the software in addition to the CS5 Suite because otherwise we can't work on the same files. I'm finding this frustrating.
Your suggestion of buying CS4 from Amazon is a good one. I will look into that further.
DISCLAIMER: I'm an Adobe stockholder. REALITY: My holdings are probably in the same proportion as the number of bits it takes to store a period character (".") on an Internet server is to the entire Internet's storage capacity. So, while I may have some self-interest here, it's not driving me to encourage you - or even all the participants on this forum - to buy more software than you want to or need to.
If you're simply interested in test-driving a new release, you can do that with the free 30-day trials. If you run out time, you can probably figure out a way to trick out your system to get another 30-day shot.
However, if you use the software commercially - either to train others, or to create new material or revise old material for clients or employers - you need to decide if you can continue to do this with the software versions you own, or if the commercial needs will require you to license new versions.
Regarding "expensing the initial cost of the software on my books" If I understand the US income-tax policies, purchases under a rather modest amount can usually be expensed in the year of purchase. If, because of your accounting method or preference, you're using a longer expensing time period, you might want to reevaluate your approach. If you attribute a portion of the software cost to each project you use it on, and, in this case, in 21 months your work hasn't let you recapture the investment, they you may want to use that information to decide how to pursue more paying for the software, or decline that stream of work and forgo upgrading.
An alternate way to evaluate the software, especially as an employer of users, is to compare the product cost vs. how many more billable hours you and your workers can complete in a given time with it and without it, and, how competitively you can bid projects, due to the product's efficiency.
HTH
Regards,
Peter
Peter Gold
KnowHow ProServices

Backward Compatibility

Hi
Our application is composed of few data layers. The layers comunicate through interfaces.
My manager thinks that we should maintain backward compatibility between the layers.
So:
There is a defined functional interface "I".
There is a layer component "L" which provides the functionality of I.
There is a layer component "UL" which Uses L via I.
A new layer component "L2" is created which has greater functionality than L and which it exposes via a new interface "I2".
All the functions of I are also provided by I2. In other words, I is a subset of I2.
"UL" will provide to a "layer factory" a version number, and the factory will return "L" or "L2" etc.
This means that we cannot override methods, and difficult maintaining of code as well as code duplication.
The bennefit of this is that all the components that worked fine with the previous "L" and were not changed, are guarantied to continue working, and needn't any QA.
What do you think? Does it worth the trouble?
Thanks,
Libbhy

libbysharf wrote:
The bennefit of this is that all the components that worked fine with the previous "L" and were not changed, are guarantied to continue working, and needn't any QA.Based on what you have stated here, this is not necessarily the case. Just having the same method signatures doesn't not mean that it will work exactly the same way. Even if the methods from L are implemented in the exact same way in L2, you could have situations where the new L2 methods change the behavior of the old L methods.
What do you think? Does it worth the trouble?Personally, I think it seems a little over-engineered. If you just add to a class, it will not break binary compatibility with existing clients. You'd be much better off spending time creating unit tests and regression test scripts and try to verify that the behaviors from the previous verison are maintained.

Is it backward compatibility of IME 9

Please,
I would like if anybody knows Intel Management Engine Drivers 9 are backward compatible with IME 7 and 8.
I have not found Intel communication on this subject.
Did anybody use it with P67A-GD55 Motherboard and Sandy Bridge Processor ?
Thank you.

momsola, Bernhard,
As I said before, I gladly admit being wrong.
And in answer of the initial question, yes the IME 9 driver seems to be backward compatible.
I've installed that driver on my P67A-GD65 board in a virtual environment running an evaluation version of Windows Server 2012 and did some initial testing using the last version of ControlCenterII. Although I haven't experienced any problems, I find it still too premature to install it in my real environment. I would also like to see some release notes confirming the backward compatibility or the known problems, but Intel did not include them in the package.
Furthermore, Intel specifically states for which boards the download is intended and that doesn't include any Intel-based boards.
Quote from: brtj on 25-April-13, 05:01:36
I'm still doubtful if the IME drivers are of much use on non-Intel boards.
I must correct myself.
I came across this article (http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/architecture-guide-intel-active-management-technology) that provides a pretty decent explanation of the function of IME and its position within Intel's AMT architecture (which in turn is part of Intel's vPro technology).
As AMT is a mainly presented as a business solution for centralized management of (remote) workstations, above all, it targets the corporate market. Because IME is part of AMT the same applies to IME.
(By the way, the IME driver package also includes updates to other AMT components, which are installed when applicable.)
However that doesn't imply that it's completely useless for the private market. MSI's ControlCenterII (whether you like it or not) is a good example and I suspect that other OEMs have comparable solutions.
As you probably already know HECI(x64).SYS is the file name of the IME driver, therefore I would also recommend reading the Wikipedia article on HECI (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HECI). It contains a practical example how IME functions/operates.
Quote from: Bernhard on 25-April-13, 00:04:02
The detailed content of the so-called management engine extension remains a grey area, [..]
I hope the aforementioned articles shed some more light.
Quote from: Bernhard on 25-April-13, 00:04:02
[...] but the known details seem to be functions that quite frankly should be handled by the normal BIOS.
After reading these articles (and some more on the subject) I disagree with you.

Backward compatibility of MS Flash object in Windows 8

I have a case opened with Microsoft from Pfizer, Inc and need a case open with Adobe so that the MS engineers can communicate with Adobe within non-disclosure constraints.
What MS needs from Adobe are debugging information the don't have in order to resolve the issue in their Win8 Flash object (15x). MS will need to share with Adobe details and data that belong to Pfizer hence need to open that channel for those purposes and for MS to request technical information from Adobe.
My MS case number is 114111712050982 so that you have that information and can share email addresses and phone numbers privately with Flash technical support.
I have picked the best fit I could find for a community

As a general rule, we'd highly recommend that everyone move from fscommand to ExternalInterface. It's a superior replacement and eliminates some of the weird quirks that fscommand has. In your situation, changes to IE11 caused backwards compatibility problems with fscommand, but ExternalInterface is unaffected. We have some work in the pipeline to address the issue on IE11, but it has the potential to break existing content on configs that currently work, so we're trying to be really methodical about providing public pre-releases and soliciting feedback. In 2014, the only high-traffic content that really uses fscommand are old enterprise applications, so it's hard for us to collect feedback or gauge the impact directly by looking at popular sites.
We just handed a build off with the proposed fscommand changes to Microsoft for inclusion in the next Windows 10 technical preview. We were soliciting feedback on any related fallout for Windows 7 users on our beta channel (http://www.adobe.com/go/flashplayerbeta); however, there's not a good way to provide a beta build for Windows 8 since Flash Player is a built-in component of IE. We're working with Microsoft to establish a beta program for Flash Player in IE on Win8+. If you have access to the Win10 Technical Preview builds, we'd encourage you to test any of your legacy systems that require Flash and give us feedback once the next update is available.
The fact that introducing a proxy solves the problem intermittently is interesting. I guess it could be some internal timing, or it might be that the proxy is masking a cross-domain policy issue or an SSL negotiation problem. Have you guys tried with a Debugger version of Flash Player? You might get some useful feedback, particularly if it's a policy file thing.
Adobe Flash Player - Downloads
Configure the debugger version of Flash Player
You can turn on policy file logging by adding these to your mm.cfg. They'll get logged to flashlog.txt:
PolicyFileLog=1 # Enables policy file logging
PolicyFileLogAppend=1 # Optional; do not clear log at startup

Backward compatibility with Captivate 7.0

We are in the process of procuring Captivate 7.0. If we develop web based training materials using Captivate 7.0 will be able to make edits in future with Captivate 6.0 ?

No backward compatibility! This is crazy. We've just tried the Save As option expecting there to be an option to save for previous versions and it's not there. What a short sighted approach to take, and very frustrating.
I am not on a maintenance contract for the software, but my colleagues are, so to be able to collaborate either they have to hold back on updates or I have to upgrade.
So this is Adobe’s approach to supporting licensed users in their ability to work collaboratively? I wish there was a competitor on the market we could use instead of Adobe.

My iPad 1 is now very unstable. Apps crash consistently, Mac Numbers/Pages etc incompatible with IOS 5.1 etc. There seems to be no backwards compatibility to iPad 1. Am I just supposed to throw it away? I have restored the iPOad and it has ample storage .

My iPad 1 is very unstable. Many Apps simply crash after opening. There is ample storage available.I have restored the iPad twice now and still it is unstable.
Is this a lack of backwards compatibility because no-one writes apps for IOS 51.1. and the original iPad anymore? not even Apple, as the documents and sheets I create on my Mac are incompatible with my iPad now.
My naievete tells me that this is simply Apple expecting us to upgrade to later levels of hardware. If so, very disappointing for an Apple fan. Seems your App developer approvals (even your own apps) do no require compatibility with anything but IOS 6 or later.

There are various things to make your iPad more stable. You can try deleting all apps from the multitasking bar; do a reset ie hold the power and home buttons simultaneously until the Apple logo appears; Settings > General > Reset all Settings.
If you had the previous version of iPages (version 09) on your Mac before upgrading to Pages 5.2, your Mac should still have that version in Applications, which is still compatible with your version of Pages on your iPad.
If you don't have that version, you can 'Export to Pages 09' which is still compatible with iOS 5.1.1.

How to create LDAP filter-based rule to check Group membership in OAM

Hi folks,
I'm having hard time creating an authorization rule to verify ldap group membership. I've followed "Configure User Authorization" article from Oracle website (http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10761_01/doc/oam.1014/b32420/v2authz.htm#BABHBFEJI) and created an Authorization scheme w ldap_attribute_name as User Parameter and ruleExpression as Required Parameter. Then, inside my policy I created an Authorization Rule based on my Authz scheme w Allow Access attrib filter-based Rule which looks like this:
ldap://ldap_server:port/ou=People,o=Company,c=US??sub?(ldap_attribute_name=ldap_attribute_value)
This works fine.
Now, I've added another filter-based rule under the same Authz Rule/Allow Access:
ldap://ldap_server:port/ou=Groups,o=Company,c=US?uniqueMember?sub?(&(objectClass=groupOfUniqueNames)(cn=ldap_group_name))
While query looks somewhat correct and works as a command-line argument (slightly modified format), it does not work in OAM (meaning people w out req-d group membership can still login).
Can someone steer me to the right direction as to what do I need to do:
1. Change/fix the ldap query
2. Create new Authz scheme with uniqueMember userParameter; create new Authz rule based on new authz scheme; create new Allow Access filter rule with the ldap query I have
3. Do smth else
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you, Roman

You can create two authorization rules
First for user with attribute
and second for group
and then in authorization expression you can have AND of these two.
Regarding your query...
First ... If your requirement is to give access to all the members of a particular group then you don't require any ldap filters
All you have to do is in the authorization rule -> Allow access -> Select People (here you have to select group so click on the group tab, its little hard to see but its there in light blue color on dark blue tab) -> select the group you want to give access
Second.. If your requirement is such that you want to give access to a member of a group which has certain attribute lets say group with status active ( In this case you are not aware of the name of the group because user can be a member of any group but you want to give access only to the group with specific attribute.) then you have to write custom authorization plugin.
If the option is second let me know i can give you a solution which will work for a single domain without any effort of developing a major plugin.
Hope this helps,
Sagar

Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 does not work in FireFox 4.How do i directly convert pages to PDF??Why is that your products are not backward compatable.U people are in the IT industry and should know this.Shame on You people.learn somthing form the IE team

While Updating to Fire Fox 4. It said Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0 is not supported.How come 3.6 supports but not 4. I believe you people have never heard of the term "Backward Compatibility" .U people will loose your customer/support base if every new version doesn't support some existing stuff.

'''Problem Solved FINALLY !'''
Solution:
I just updated my '''Adobe Acrobat X Pro''' to '''Version 10.1.0'''.By the way, I have to complain, Adobe is really slow in solving this problem...
Here is the official link for the Adobe Acrobat update.[http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135 <click me!>http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=5135<click me!>]
After update, the extention changed from "Adobe Acrobat -Create PDF 1.0" into "Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1". And the '''"Adobe Acrobat - Create PDF 1.1" is compatiable with the firefox 4.0.1'''. A screenshot is attached as a proof.

I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro (2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks? I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility. Is this possible or do I need to purchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

I want to install Snow Leopard Server on our MacPro(2.66) using Mac Mini Snow Leopard Server disks? I kept getting an error for backwards compatibility. Is this possible or do I need topurchase another copy of Snow Leopard Server?

The OS disks that are shipped with a particular product
are set up so that tey will only install on that product.
It will install on any Mini of that exact vintage, but that
is all.
This is to prevent people from doing exactly what you
are trying to do. The license for OSX shipped with any
is only valid for that product. Also, Snow Leopard,
including Server, is only permitted to be run on one
computer at a time. Bottom line, unlike Lion, legally
you cannot install the same copy on multiple
computers unless some "family pack" or site license
is purchased.
Yes, you need to purchase another copy.
The copy of Snow Leopard license is here:
http://images.apple.com/legal/sla/docs/macosx_snowleopard.pdf

Specific Flash Player 10 Backward Compatibility Issue

There's an issue with backward compatibility on Flash Player
10 that is breaking a lot of Flash content that was created with a
tool that I develop and sell. It is to do with the way
globalToLocal and localToGlobal handles NaN.
I've reported it on the bugbase at
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-964
There are more details here -
http://www.questionwriterblog.com/archives/2008/11/scrollbar_causing_content_to_disappear. html
The impact of the bug can be seen here.
http://www.questionwriter.com/samples/fp10problem/v1perceptions.swf
It is a serious enough backward compatibility issue, and
doubtless affects other content too. I'm hoping for the outcome
that the functionality will be restored in future player releases -
but right now, can someone give me confirmation it is on the Flash
Player team radar?

bump!

Backward Compatibility Question

Our ADS system is running with Basis 7.0 SAPKB70005
Can we develop forms on systems with a lower Basis version e.g. 6.4?
Are there backward compatibility issues?
Regards,
Lavaughn

Hi Lavaughn
it depends a bit on what you want to do.
If you want to develop the form on the 6.40 box and then render it with the 7.0 Application Server, the answer is No, as the solution always needs to be on the same NW level (i.e. either '04 or 2004s). SAP development always coordinates changes between Designer, ADS, Reader, and the SAP development environment - and there are a few incompatible changes between '04 and 2004s.
If you want to develop and render the forms on the 7.0 box and integrate data from a lower-release backend (e.g. R/3 Enterprise), you can do that for interactive scenarios using RFC connections to transfer the data and/or the PDF form from system to system.
Do not attempt to do this for print forms. The amount of data that may have to be transferred will heavily impact the form generation time.
Kind regards,
Markus Meisl
SAP NetWeaver Product Management

I am considering CS6. I worry about "backwards compatability." I am in a windows-only environment. Some files were antiquated mac computer. Files are: psd doc eps tif indd otf ai jpg RW2 xmp pm7 bmp fh9 fh10 dng pm6 and ps. Rick

I am considering CS6. I worry about
"backwards compatability." I am in a windows-only environment. Some files were antiquated mac computer. Files are: psd doc eps tif indd otf ai jpg
RW2 xmp pm7 bmp fh9 fh10 dng pm6 and ps. Rick

Backward compatibility FROM what TO what?
CS6 to older, or newer to CS6?
For specific answers, you most likely need to check in the forums for specific programs
The Cloud forum is not about using individual programs
The Cloud forum is about the Cloud as a delivery & install process
If you will start at the Forums Index https://forums.adobe.com/welcome
You will be able to select a forum for the specific Adobe product(s) you use
Click the "down arrow" symbol on the right (where it says All communities) to open the drop down list and scroll

Property Based Rule - Backward compatibility

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for