Proxy user getting to the SPAM Quarantine

I have finally setup the spam quarantine after a year of use. My problem is I have several resources that get email and a several users that monitor those resources. How do I allow them to see the quarantined email of another account?
Thanks

If you are sending out spam notifications this is already working. The original recipient(s) will simply get a notification which contains a link to the spam quarantine. This link contains an authentication token so that they do not need to enter a username or password to view the mail in the quarantine.

Similar Messages

Automating a Website with WebBrowser control, but proxy is getting in the way

Hi
I am trying to automate a website query through SSIS, I have a dll that uses the WebBrowser control to download the page, run the query and parse the returned page for detail.
This works well on my development machine, including in the Agent, but as soon as I try it on a server I run into issues with Proxy. I need to use a proxy to get out onto the internet, but the account that is running as the base is just a service account
so setting the Internet Settings in the registry fails because it hasn't really go a full user hive and as soon as I try to set it with Registry.SetValue I get Access Denied, when I look at the account it has no complete hive, hence the error
Any help much appretiated
Andy
CRM 4, SQL Server and .Net developer using C#

Hi Andy,
Thank you for your question. I am currently looking into this issue and will give you an update as soon as possible.
Thank you for your understanding and support.
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

Always_bcc user gets all killed spam

Interesting one that I just noticed. I don't think there is any way around it but mentioning just in case...
If you have a 'user' in the 'Copy All Mail To:' box (in my case the 'mailarchive' user, then even if a piece of spam gets rejected due to being over the Kill level, it still gets sent to the mailarchive user.
This appears counter-intuitive when tracking the message through the mail.log. The always_bcc account gets added at the very beginning, after the initial connection (evidenced by having nrcpt=2)...
<pre class=command>postfix/smtpd[18899]: connect from mail5.onyx.net[194.176.73.196]
postfix/smtpd[18899]: 56DAF4C7CE: client=mail5.onyx.net[194.176.73.196]
postfix/cleanup[18902]: 56DAF4C7CE: message-id=<[email protected]>
postfix/qmgr[18880]: 56DAF4C7CE: from=<[email protected]>, size=3041, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
postfix/smtpd[18899]: disconnect from mail5.onyx.net[194.176.73.196]</pre>
You then see the handover to amavisd...
<pre class=command>postfix/smtpd[18908]: connect from localhost[127.0.0.1]
postfix/smtpd[18908]: 69D7F4C7F1: client=localhost[127.0.0.1]
postfix/cleanup[18902]: 69D7F4C7F1: message-id=<[email protected]>
postfix/qmgr[18880]: 69D7F4C7F1: from=<[email protected]>, size=3658, nrcpt=2 (queue active)
postfix/smtpd[18908]: disconnect from localhost[127.0.0.1]</pre>
Where the spam is scored beyond the Kill level and sent to the spamquarantine account...
<pre class=command>postfix/pipe[18914]: 69D7F4C7F1: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=1,
 status=sent (mail.panoramicscotland.com)</pre>
Then reject notices are seen for the two recipients, including the always_bcc = mailarchive user...
<pre class=command>postfix/smtp[18903]: 56DAF4C7CE: to=<[email protected]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=26,
 status=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected,
 UBE, id=18707-01 (in reply to end of DATA command))
postfix/smtp[18903]: 56DAF4C7CE: to=<[email protected]>, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1], delay=26,
 status=bounced (host 127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1] said: 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected,
 UBE, id=18707-01 (in reply to end of DATA command))
server postfix/qmgr[18880]: 56DAF4C7CE: removed</pre>
A bounce message is sent to the sender...
<pre class=command>server postfix/cleanup[18902]: 2EF134C7F8: message-id=<[email protected]>
server postfix/qmgr[18880]: 2EF134C7F8: from=, size=5413, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
server postfix/pipe[18914]: 2EF134C7F8: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=0,
 status=sent (mail.panoramicscotland.com)
server postfix/qmgr[18880]: 2EF134C7F8: removed</pre>
However, the original message is still sent to the mailarchive...
<pre class=command>server postfix/pipe[18911]: 69D7F4C7F1: to=<[email protected]>, relay=cyrus, delay=1,
 status=sent (mail.panoramicscotland.com)
server postfix/qmgr[18880]: 69D7F4C7F1: removed</pre>
It appears that the always_bcc option bypasses any intermediate rejection by amavisd - note that message id (69D7F4C7F1) references original message prior to handover to amavisd and rejection within this). Arguably, this is intentional but slightly annoying due to receiving unnecesary spam.
Any ideas?
-david
Applicable amavisd.conf settings...
$spamquarantineto = '[email protected]';
$finalspamdestiny = D_REJECT;
$sakill_leveldeflt = 5.0;
Applicable postfix main.cf setting...
always_bcc = [email protected]

The only solution (hopefully) I see, would be to
add:
-o always_bcc=
below:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd -v
in master.cf
That didn't do it, Alex (I thought it would, too, after you suggested it) but you put me onto the right track though...
The solution appears to be 'receiveoverride_options=no_addressmappings' in same location. There is already an option there for the receiveoverrideoptions so the noaddressmappings just gets added to it...
Pre-existing clause...
<pre class=command>127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - y - - smtpd
-o receiveoverride_options=no_header_bodychecks</pre>
New clause...
<pre class=command>127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - y - - smtpd
-o receiveoverride_options=no_header_body_checks,no_addressmappings</pre>
Only killed mail being forwarded to spamquarantine account gets NOT copied. tagged spam and clean mail (incoming & outgoing) all get bcc'd as normal. Also works for the virusquarantine account if this is configured for a mail account (in amavisd.conf).
Thanks,
-david
Links...
http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESSREWRITING_README.html#autobcc
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#receiveoverrideoptions

Can I change the role a new user gets in the B2C senario

Hi.
I am in the Business Blue Print phase of a Web Shop project based on the CRM 4.0 E-commerce.
As I understand it, a user registering at the shop is created as a business partner with the role "Consumer".
We are already using the consumer role for a different purpose, so I would like the web shop users to be created with a custom role (e.g. ZConsumer) - will this be possible in any way?
Thanks,
Anders

Hi Anders and Rami,
I'm not sure about what you asked.
1 Anyway if you refer to role present in the tab classification/hour:
Customer
Prospect
Competitor
Consumer,
you cannot change these roles, as they are defined by SAP.
Believe me because it was me explained during the Isa course, before getting certification.
But on the other hand if you refer to the roles you can assigned to your BP, you control this in customizing.
Please as usual, reward with points if it helps.
AndreA

Ironport C170 Unable to view the Spam Quarantine messages

I'm new to the Ironport appliance. When I click on Monitor-->Spam Quarantine, then click on Messages a new window appears and I should see all of the emails that were marked "spam". For some reason when the second window opens, I receive a blank page. Everything works fine on my other C170 appliance.

Hi Billy, if you move mouse cursor over the number of spam messages on page Monitor>Spam quarantine, what URL address you see?
Something like https://www.domain.com:83/Search?auth=13900f1d2a029b017464c596a88bb7a8?
Can you resove "www.domain.com" to correct IP address of your ESA server?
Are Spam Quarantine>Spam Quarantine HTTP & Spam Quarantine HTTPS enabled at Network>IP Interfaces>Interface page? Do interface's IP address & spam quarantine ports match to URL address (does www.domain.com resolve to this IP address) at Monitor>Spam quarantine?
Is there any firewall blocking this connection?

End User SPAM Quarantine checkbox to select all messages not working

We are running SPAM Quarantine on M670 running 8.1.0-476 and accessing with Internet Explorer 9.0. After logging into the SPAM Quarantine there is a top row check box that normally we can check to select all messages. This stopped working in IE for us, any idea what setting/option we could adjust to enable it again?
In Chrome 29, FireFox 23 it works as expected.
Jason

I think this is a know bug in 8.0, see below:
CSCuj42166
Selecting all messages in ISQ at once not possible with IE 8.0/7.0/6.0
Symptom:
When accessing the spam quarantine on ESA using IE 8.0/7.0/6.0 and trying to select all messages at once, an error occurs and no message is checked. At the bottom of the browser we see an "Error on page"
Conditions:
ESA running 8.0.0-671 and Internet Explorer 8.0 (same valid for 6.0 and 7.0)
Workaround:
Using a different browser to access the Centralized Spam Quarantine like for example Safari, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Internet Explorer 9
Further Problem Description:
Details
Known Affected Releases: (2)
8.0.0(Venetian)-671 | 8.5.0(FourQueens)-0
Known Fixed Releases: 0
Release Pending
Product: Cisco Email Security Appliance

IPhone user getting BB network sync messages - wants them to stop

Hello everyone. Just signed up here, happy user of Blackberry Tour 9630 with Bell Mobility in Montreal, Quebec, Canada for nearly two years.
HOWEVER, my current need for assistance has absolutely NOTHING to do with my Blackberry model, my carrier, or my OS version.
For the past 6 years, I have been providing Email gateway services with spam and malware filtering to several small corporate clients. At the end of March 2011, one user (also a high-level company admin at one of my client domains) has begun receiving messages from a range of network addresses, as follows:
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
All those messages have a subject similar to this:
RIM_bca28a80-e9c0-11d1-87fe-00600811c6a2
The message body begins with "This message is used to carry data between the BlackBerry handheld and an associated server. Please do not delete, move or respond to this message - it will be processed by the server."
The problem is that this person is using an iPhone, not a BB, and he is receiving these messages both on his iPhone and on his Windows desktop (in Office Outlook).
He also tells me he never had a Blackberry, and that he DID NOT ask for these messages to be sent to him. For sure, he might very well have ACTUALLY done something that caused this, but he cannot recall what it was. One of his employees lost her Blackberry just before going on maternity leave for a year, starting in March, and he did mention doing something (vaguely remembered) related to that loss (and replacement).
Be that as it may. The fact is that he does not have a Blackberry, but an iPhone (and apparently NEVER had a Blackberry). Under those circumstances, is there some way to register a request that these messages no longer be sent, by either Emailing or phoning someone at RIM (or any other way)? So far, I am sending hundreds of these messages per week to the spam quarantine, from which they have to be purged periodically.
By the way, I just signed up to Twitter earlier today (something which I was in no hurry to do), just so I could attempt to obtain help from the "BlackBerryHelp" Twitter channel. Well, I posted the following tweet 2 hours ago, and so far I have received no response:
"@BlackBerryHelp iPhone user getting msgs from "[email protected]", wants them filtered. How do we stop them at source?"
So much for "Official Twitter support account of Research In Motion. We’re staffed from 9-8 EST Monday -Friday and 9-6 Saturday. ". What kind of response time should I be expecting? Am I too impatient?
Thanks in advance to anyone who might be able to shed some light on this problem and its solution...

Normally that message comes about from having installed the Blackberry Desktop Software on the PC in an incorrect manner, which the link below will show how to correct it. I am guessing someone (might not have been this user, could have been his secretary or another employee who does have a BlackBerry) installed the BlackBerry Desktop Software on his PC with the "redirector" option checked, which is most normally the origin. See below.
Article ID: KB04254 Network@etp email messages are received on the BlackBerry smartphone and email application
Article ID: KB21849 Network@etp messages are received in the email application and on the BlackBerry smartphone
As far as the twitter help accout, yea, I'm thinking two hours response time might be a bit high in expectations. But doesn't matter, the above links should solve the issue.
And, aside from collecting the messages in a spam folder, you could just blacklist them on the users' email server, and they won't even reach the server.
1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Finally using SPAM quarantine and want to know how many e-mails are being released

We have two C660s and one M660 and we are finally using the SPAM quarantine functionality on the M660 and so far it has been awesome.   For my pilot group I have the spam thresholds set as low as recommended by the GUI at 50 (positive) and 25 (suspected)...   First off, if I change these numbers will I see noticiable differences in what is allowed through and what isn't?
My real question is, is there an easy way to see what mail is being released by users from the SPAM quarantine? Originally I had a content filter setup that was working..   but now it appears that when users are releasing e-mails from the quarantine it is skipping any type of content filtering.. From what I can tell, e-mails are still being routed from the M660 to one of the two C660s for delivery.. but in the mail logs I see information like:
Wed Aug 15 09:34:32 2012 Info: ISQ: Delivering MID 1592784 to ISQ (skipping work queue)
And in Message Tracking I see:
15 Aug 2012 09:32:23 (GMT -05:00)
Message 116381462 was released from Spam Quarantine, IP address 10.25.211.100.
15 Aug 2012 09:32:23 (GMT -05:00)
Message 116381462 released from Spam Quarantine. Work queue skipped.
15 Aug 2012 09:32:23 (GMT -05:00)
Message 116381462 queued for delivery.
15 Aug 2012 09:32:23 (GMT -05:00)
(DCID 40556495) Delivery started for message 116381462 to
My outgoing content filter is setup like:
Conditions
Apply rule: If one or more conditions match Only if all conditions match
Order
Condition
Rule
Delete
1
Remote IP/Hostname
remote-ip == XXXXXXXX
2
Envelope Sender
mail-from !=XXXXXXXXXX
Actions
Order
Action
Rule
Delete
1
Add Log Entry
log-entry("ReleasedFromSpamQuarantine")
XXXXXXX = the IP address of our M660..
XXXXXXXX = the e-mail address used by our M660 to send out reports/alerts etc..
Appreciate any input/feedback...
Jason

Hello Jason,
one thing about the trhesholds, the defaults are 50/90 for suspected and positive spam, and that usually works for most customers, in some cases if still spam gets trough we suggest to modify that to 40/80, but you should not get any lower, as this will just increase the number of false positives. In general, the antispam engine delivers a value way above or below the thresholds, means scores are always either below 10 (no spam) or above 90 (spam), very few are inbetween this range, so usually the default setting works.
About the information of which user released a message, there is unfortunately no direct way to get this done. You might try this approach:
1. mail_logs: Look for the MID of the message when its getting injected to the SMA, note that this is not the same MID as in message tracking.
2. mail_logs: Look for the message getting released, and note the time stamp:
6 Aug 2012 13:29:21 (GMT) Start Message 10054459 ICID 0 release from Spam Quarantine
3. Do a
CLI: grep timestamp euqgui_logs
with the timestamp you retreived from the mail logs (just use the Day, hour, and minute part), this should get you the log lines for the particular minute, check them for the name of the user who was accessing the GUI at that time.
Hope that helps,
Andreas

How to pass Proxy user dynamically in Toplink proxy authentication?

Hi,
I'm using Toplink Proxy Authentication with my ADF JSF application and want to pass the Proxy user dynamically to the preLogin(..) method of mySessionEventListener (Currently proxy user is hard coded).
This is to make my application user as the Proxy user.
I have tried to do this in two ways:
1) In my Login screen Backing Bean, I retrieve the session as
session = sessionFactory.acquireSession(); and set the application user in it as
session.setProperty("proxyUser1", inputText1.getValue());
But,
session.getProperty("proxyUser1") returns null in the preLogin(..) method
2) I add a loginUser property to the mySessionEventListener class and create a constructor to set it.
Then I call the constructor from my Login Backing Bean as
mySessionEventListener eventMgr = new mySessionEventListener(<proxy_user>);
session.getEventManager().addListener( eventMgr );
But, the loginUser property seeems to be transient and does not retain value when retrieved in preLogin(..) method.
Please indicate if anything is wrong. Also, is there any other way to get this done?
Thanks in advance.
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Probably your sessions.xml defines a ServerSession, and acquireSession method returns a ClientSession. ServerSession is the object that connects to the database, it may have any number of ClientSessions associated with it - all of them use connections provided by ServerSession's connection pools.
So if you'd like to alter the serverSession before login, acquireSession is too late - it triggers login of the ServerSession and returns a ClientSession.
To get the ServerSession before login:
// the first param indicates that the session shouldn't be connected
Session serverSession = sessionFactory.getSharedSession(false, false);Now you have a serverSession on which login hasn't been called yet.
You can set the property into the session, or directly into its login.
In fact you may choose to do whatever you wanted to do in preLogin right here - in this case no preLogin event would be required of course.
Finally to get a ClientSession, call the same api did:
// the first param indicates that the session shouldn't be connected
Session clientSession = sessionFactory.getSession();On the first such call the ServerSession will be connected.
Note that because all the ClientSessions will connect through the connections provided by the same ServerSession they will all use proxyUser1.
If you are interested in using different proxy users for different ClientSessions http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/ias/toplink/doc/1013/main/_html/dblgcfg008.htm#BABDABCF lists several scenarios for that.
Andrei

How to I get rid of Spam?

I get so much spam on my Verizon account I can't use it as my main account. I get pages of spam every day. I have a g-mail account and a mac.com account that works great. Wish verizon.net did.
I would think that Verizon would have a spam filter.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Dressage74 wrote:
I get so much spam on my Verizon account I can't use it as my main account. I get pages of spam every day. I have a g-mail account and a mac.com account that works great. Wish verizon.net did.
I would think that Verizon would have a spam filter.
They do. Do you have it turned on for your email account? If not, do so, it may help. Of course you can also create custom filters to recognize and delete emails that get through the SPAM filter, but unfortunately the filtering is pretty basic, there is no ability to filter just by domain, for example.
Justin
FiOS TV, 25/25 Internet, and Digital Voice user
QIP7232, QIP7100-P2, IMG 1.9.1
Keller, TX 76248

ESA - External Auth - Spam Quarantine

I'm looking to see if anyone has a workaround for admins logging into Spam Quarantine and not being able to set their safelist / block list. I'm using AD accounts for TACACS+ / Radius on my ACS 5.4 appliance and I found an issue when using Radius for admin access to my ESA. After enabling Radius, admins who log into the spam quarantine site have access to everyone's spam which is correct, but they no longer have the option field to setup their safelist / block list.
Thx
-Kevin

I also have the same issue. The only way around it for me was to use different accounts for administrating the IronPort appliances. This fell into alignment with my organizations practice of setting up seperate Admin accounts for server/workstation administration that is seperate from a server admin's user account.
I think the appliance is confused, because when you login with an administrative level account you see the quarantine of all users, so it can't add safelist/blocklist addresses because it doesn't know what mailbox to add these to.
Be interested to hear what Cisco has to say about it.

Incoming Mail Policy is not working - SPAM quarantine

I have configured a Mail Policy that has the Antispam disabled. I have done this because of an specific mail user that wants to receive all the emails, including the ones the ESA consider spam.
I usually works fine but now I have 4 emails in the spam quarantine. All of them are from the same sender. I have the details and there is this one line that "explains" why the email is send to quarantine:
"Remote procedure call connection (RCID 13) started for message 65161521 to local Spam Quarantine.".
Can you please give me some advice in order to know what causes this Remote call procedure connection?
Thanks!!
MAIL POLICY "No-spam-check" MATCHED THESE RECIPIENTS: [email protected]
19 Nov 2014 09:52:21 (GMT +05:00)
Protocol SMTP interface in.perulng (IP 129.39.179.38) on incoming connection (ICID 59143385) from sender IP 104.200.16.96. Reverse DNS host mta11.avanzaperu.pe verified yes.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:21 (GMT +05:00)
(ICID 59143385) ACCEPT sender group UNKNOWNLIST match sbrs[none] SBRS unable to retrieve
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Start message 65161521 on incoming connection (ICID 59143385).
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 enqueued on incoming connection (ICID 59143385) from [email protected].
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 on incoming connection (ICID 59143385) added recipient ([email protected]).
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 contains message ID header '<6C67A08179394CEA891EBF61D105B938@User-PC>'.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 original subject on injection: Envasado y Empaque de Alimentos y Bebidas
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 (29275 bytes) from [email protected] ready.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 matched per-recipient policy No-spam-check for inbound mail policies.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Spam engine: SLBL. Interim verdict: Positive
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Spam engine: SLBL. Final verdict: Positive
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Virus engine Sophos. Interim verdict: CLEAN
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Virus engine. Final verdict: Negative
19 Nov 2014 09:52:25 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Outbreak Filters. Verdict: Negative
19 Nov 2014 09:52:25 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 queued for delivery.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:27 (GMT +05:00)
Remote procedure call connection (RCID 13) started for message 65161521 to local Spam Quarantine.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:28 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 quarantined in Spam Quarantine.

That message got spam checked, was declared spam, so the RPC call happens to put it in the Quarantine.
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Spam engine: SLBL. Interim verdict: Positive
19 Nov 2014 09:52:24 (GMT +05:00)
Message 65161521 scanned by Anti-Spam engine: SLBL. Final verdict: Positive
If you want to deliver this, either don't scan it by setting the Anti-Spam scanning to disabled, or set the action to Deliver, and maybe add something to the subject?

[OIM] Proxy User with groups

Dear people,
I have a scenario where there is a resource with an approval workflow, with 2 steps: in the first the Manager of the requester is the one who must approve. In the second step, a group is assigned as the one who has to make the approve.
I give a proxy to the Manager and another proxy to one of the group members.
When the workflow reaches the Manager approval step, it is automatically assigned to the proxy (what I expected).
The problem arises when the workflow reaches the group approval step, the assignment is still made to the user that is member of the group, not to his proxy user. Is this an OIM limitation? Some workaround?
Thanks!

Hi,
when we assign the task to a group then if the proxy user is the part of that particular group then he has that task automatically why to duplicate the task and if proxy user is not the memeber of the group then he is not authorize to have that task because he is not the member of that group. As user set him as proxy user for him not for group.
I hope this answer your query....
Regards
Alabhya Goel

Authenticate/Authorize a proxy user in Workflow.

Are there any methods to Authenticating a Proxy User in Workflow. I am running some workflow in the anonymous user context. In that context i do not have the privileges run for example the password generator. It works fine when i am an enduser or admin. I would like to use a proxy user so that the password generator will work. Any idea on how to proceed with this in workflow.
Thanks

Hi donjosh, were you able to solve this issue?
Is there a way to change context from anonymous context to end user context?
I'm authenticating users with siteminder and I want to automatically create users that don't exists in IDM running a process as anonymous user and then redirecting to the end user interface, how this can be done??
thanks,

User Banned from the forum using proxy server??

HI for awhile now I cannot get on the forum without disabling my proxt server. Why is this? Does adobe need my IP so badly??? This has been going since they started the cloud.. Please help me find out how to get on while on a proxy server. I use netshade and a VPN. It just can't find the server.
Here are the screen shots
and

Thanks for the advise Pat. this is recent problem. So I guess adobe does not have a work around in the offing? Does this mean that my proxy server is funeling some of those IPs?? Is it flagged somehow?? I suppose I can't reinstall while the proxy is in place then so it will see and recognize it? well thanks anyway. do you have any idea if this is why adobe thinks I am in trial mode when I really have a full license?? I keep getting the pop-up and the days keep counting down and I keep putting in my full license and it keeps asking every time I open the app. I don't wnat to get to day 0 and not be able to use photoshop which I paid full price for when it first came out! Any help would be most welcome. thanks aloha, Uhane
Pat Willener wrote:
I don't think Adobe is interested in your IP address. Also, banning proxy servers is not directed against you, but against certain people who really want to hide their IP addresses: spammers.
You don't know how many spam messages are removed daily from this forum by moderators and administrators. Forum spam has become a great problem over the last few years, and banning IP ranges from where forum spam originates has been quite effective.
So I don't think there is a way of letting legitimate users like you using a proxy server to login, while at the same time keeping spammers at bay.

Proxy user getting to the SPAM Quarantine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for