PS 9.0 Security - maintaining security in 2 releases.

I am working on an upgrade approach for security 9.0, Our current PS environment is 8.3, with PeopleTools 8.2. We are upgrading to PS 9.0/ PT 8.49. We create Oprid's during a nightly batch cycle. We have taken a copy of our PS 8.3 database, with the PeopleTools tables for the initial upgrade, using Oracle Labs. My question, is there a way to migrate the new production Oprid's that have been created since the initial copy of production. We will not be going live with 9.0 for 16 months, and need to maintain PS Oprid's in the upgrade environment.
Any help is appreciated,
KT Hargett

I do not know why PeopleSoft does not provide a good solution for such situation. i've seen numerous situations where the client need to address this problems through thier own solutions.
In order to preserve security upto date as with production, your golden copy (the target database that was upgraded during initial pass) must be constantly updated with all security tables. There is no one clear cut solutions. What many of them have done is if the length of upgrade project is spanning more than 6 months, they would write a custom process to update the OPRID everytime they do test move to prod and migrate the security tables data to golden copy.
here's what one of the PeopleSoft Customer Connection Solution says:
E-UPG How can you preserve security through upgrade passes? (Doc ID 642944.1)
SOLUTION:
In order to preserve security through your upgrade passes, you will have 3 options.
1) Low Risk - Re-enter your security changes into one of the target databases. Once this is complete, those security tables can be exported out and imported into any other upgraded databases at the same tools release using security migration reDocument:610138.1, included below.
2) Low Risk - Re-do the Initial Upgrade again. This will get the security as it is when you take the copy of production. Many customers chose this option because they are most comfortable with it. Once the initial upgrade is completed, follow the steps outlined in reDocument:610138.1 (Included below) to migrate security to your other upgraded databases.
3) High Risk -
Attention! This workaround has not gone through our formal quality regression test cycle. We strongly recommend that you thoroughly test this workaround in a development environment before applying it to your production environment.
Be sure to document this change as this workaround may be detected during your next upgrade. Because this workaround has not yet gone through our formal quality regression test cycle, this workaround will have risk.
You should only follow this option if you only want the latest operator security in production migrated to your upgraded database. Do the Initial Upgrade again, up through the end of Chapter 2 (Updating PeopleTools). You will need to definitely run the Relnnn.sql scripts, copy the projects and do the alters - but to make sure you get everything correct, it would be best to run all steps in Chapter 2. Once completed your tools release will be at the same level as your fully upgraded database that you want operator security imported into. DO NOT FOLLOW Document:610138.1 as you will LOSE ALL security delivered by the new application release you just upgraded to. To migrate your operator security, select the appropriate Data Mover script for your PeopleTools release to export and import operator security:
For PT 8.4x -
******Export******
USEREXPORT.dms
This script looks as follows:
-- USERS
EXPORT PSOPRDEFN;
EXPORT PSOPRALIAS;
EXPORT PSROLEUSER;
EXPORT PSUSERATTR;
EXPORT PSUSEREMAIL;
EXPORT PSUSERPRSNLOPTN;
EXPORT PS_ROLEXLATOPR;
EXPORT PS_RTE_CNTL_RUSER;
******Import******
USERIMPORT.dms
This script looks as follows:
UPDATE PSLOCK SET VERSION = VERSION + 1 WHERE OBJECTTYPENAME = 'UPM';
REPLACE_DATA *;
UPDATE PSVERSION SET VERSION = VERSION + 1 WHERE OBJECTTYPENAME = 'SYS';
UPDATE PSVERSION SET VERSION = VERSION + 1 WHERE OBJECTTYPENAME = 'UPM';
UPDATE PSOPRDEFN SET VERSION = (SELECT VERSION FROM PSVERSION WHERE OBJECTTYPENAME = 'UPM');
hope this helps
[Learn PeopleSoft HRMS and Upgrade|http://www.learnpeoplesoft.info]

Similar Messages

  • Print Security Deposit after release.

    I have a request to print the SD after is released.  I will appreciate a suggestion on what exit can be used?
    Thank you for your assistance...

    Hi,
    There are many Events(Tcode-fqevents) available in FICA for printing the correpondance after a certain activity has taken place. You can check out the following events 716, 830, 870.
    regards
    Gagan

  • Is 33.0 a Beta release as it says in view more info or a strongly recommended security and stablilty release?

    I was about to apply the new Filefox 33.0 update, but when I went to "View more information", the page there says 33.0Beta. I don't want a beta release. I am not sure what to do. I have Windows 7 Professional and Firefox 32.0.3 now. Thanks.

    Firefox 32.0 would not update to a Beta build of 33.0 unless you were using a Beta build of 32.0 and not the 32.0 Release at time.
    Firefox 33.0 is on Beta channel (currently at 33.0b9) and it will be on Release channel for Release as of October 14. The Beta channel will then start with 34.0b1.

  • Security Deposit Payment and Clearing!

    Hi Experts,
    We have an requirement when the cash security deposit is processed/released in SAP ISU it should hit the liability ledger account and not the bank clearing account.
    As per SAP standard functionlity when the cash security deposit request is initially posted it will have only A/R account associated with it as it is a statistical item with the main and sub of 0020/0020 and when the actual payment is received we post as an cash security deposit payment with the main/sub as 0020/0010 through assignment in the posting area 1010.
    We have maintained the 0020/0010 in EK02 with the liability account assocaited with it.
    Though it reads as cash security deposit payment as it is still posted through the payment lots it hits the bank clearing account associated with the payment lot and not the ledger account associated with the main and sub of 0020/0010. I checked the posting area 1010 and it didnt allow the G/L account to be specified during down payment clearing.
    I am not sure if there is a way to handle this but our requirement is to capture this cash security deposit payment in different liability ledger account and not the Bank clearing/Cash in transit account.
    Any thoughts on how to go about it and fix this issue will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Bharat

    Hi - I recommend you document the expected postings, because when the security deposit is made, you are debiting cash, right?
    Here would be the expected postings as an accountant when the security deposit is made:
    Debit Cash
      Credit Liability
    When security deposit is released, then the following should occur:
    Debit Liability
    Credit cash
    So to me the assumption that it shouldn't post to the bank clearing account is incorrect; it should as cash transactions are occurring, right?  I recommend documenting the requirements with the accountant.
    Tammy

  • Downpayment Request and Security Deposit

    Hi Experts,
    My scenario is to create a downpayment request, make a payment and it should get cleared with the actual receivables.I created a Down payment request through Manual posting.Did the payment for the same. But during my final bill it doesnt get cleared with my actual receivables. I have done the required configuration for Down payments in posting area 1010 with 3000/0010 alongwith clearing restriction '5' and also maiantained them in SAP Utilities -> Invoice Processing -> Item Selection in Account Maintainence as well as Bill printout but unable to acheive the same.
    Moreover, I checked my Security deposit also. It is getting cleared but still remaining as a down payment item. Event R401 is also active.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in anticipation.
    Richa Tyagi

    Hi,
    Also check the Clearing configuring for invoicing has the Account Maintenance Clearing Variant defined:
    Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable ->Basic Functions ->Open Item Management.->Clearing Control->Define Specifications for Clearing Types->Define Specifications for IS-U Invoicing
    Ensure that the Final Billing Clearing Types R42 and R43 are assigned the Account Maintenance Clearing Variant.
    In addtion, extend the Interval Days in Item Selection in Invoicing to be 999 days. While Due dates should not matter for credits, some functionality respects the due date.
    If all this fails, make sure your Event R401 is not bypassing any standard logic that is contained with the IS-U standard Event ISU_EVENT_R401.
    Also, make sure that your account is not a multi-contract account. There are dependencies during Move-out/Final bill for Security Deposits the Release can occur only if all contracts are moved out.
    Regards,
    Ivor M.

  • Email Security Plug-in - Doesn't seem to work with right click or save and send

    I've searched the knowledge base but have not located the answer yet.
    We have the Encrypt Message plug-in installed to flag the email [SEND SECURE].  This works very well when in Outlook.  It does not seem to work when right clicking a file to send outside of Outlook or performing Save and Send from within Microsoft Office.  The add-in still shows and users are clicking it and the Send button but the emails are not going securely.  We are on Microsoft2010 on mostly XP machines.
    How can I get Encrypt Message to work in all instances?
    Thank you.
    Starla

    Andreas
    I am getting an error.  See below for what I'm choosing and the response.  let me know if I'm supposed to be trying to download from another area.
    Thanks
    Starla
    Email Security Plug-in - Doesn't seem to work with right click or save and send
    Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance C370
    Release:IPAS
    Filename: CiscoEmailSecurity_7-2-0-039.exe
      Remove
    Details
    Release
    IPAS
    Filename
    CiscoEmailSecurity_7-2-0-039.exe
    Release Date
    25/Oct/2011
    Description
    Cisco IronPort Email Security Plug-in (Outlook)
    Size
    32541.84375 KB (33322848 bytes)
    Router Checksum
    0x553f
    MD5
    f0c864697d9e1a3e8f5297062943ac50
    Email Security Plug-in - Doesn't seem to work with right click or save and send
    Save the device to 'My Added Devices' list
    More Info
    'My Added Devices' list could be found by: 1. Clicking on 'My Cisco' Tab and expanding
        the 'Added Devices' section. 2. Selecting any task specific product
       selector and clicking on 'My Added
        Devices' in left pane.
    Email Security Plug-in - Doesn't seem to work with right click or save and send
    Set Cisco Notification Alert
    More Info
    All 'Cisco Notification Alerts' list could be found
    by: 1. Clicking on 'My Cisco' Tab and expanding
        the 'Support Notifications' section.
    Cisco service contract information indicates you are not authorized to download software for the following product(s):
    Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance C170
    Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance C370
    Cisco IronPort Email Security Appliance C650
    To download software for other product(s), remove the software for the product(s) listed above.
    Or, if you feel this message is in error, please:
    1. Email technical support for 24x7 assistance. To expedite your request, please include the following information:
             User ID (Cisco.com ID used to download software)
             Contact Name
             Company Name
             Contract Number
             Product ID
             Desired Software Release or File Name
    2. Contact your Cisco Representative, Partner or Reseller to ensure product(s) listed above are covered on a service contract. The Partner Locator link may assist in locating your nearest partner.
    3. Associate contracts for those products to your Cisco.com profile using the Instructions found in Profile Manager. After you submit your additional contracts, verification and updates may take up to 6 hours to complete.

  • Difference between SAP CRM Security and SAP ECC 6.0 security

    Hi
    I have extensively worked on SAP ECC security but haven't have chance to work on CRM Security.
    Can anyone please let me know the difference between CRM security compared to  ECC security.
    Thanks...

    I am sorry to say, but instead of giving the guy a decent answer you are starting a fight or discussion about stupid forum points...
    really sad.....
    The big  difference between SAP ECC and SAP CRM Security (up to release 5.0) was the following:
    1) For sure there are very different transaction codes in SAP CRM as compared to SAP ECC in the first place
    2)  If you are familiar with R/3 or ECC authorizations; then you know that already on transaction code level, the 'allowed activity' is controlled on tcode level , whereas in SAP CRM , in most cases the 'allowed activity is not controlled by the Transaction code, but on authorization object level....
    E.g. transaction code BP allows you to create/change/display  any type of Business Partner (e.g; sold-to/ship-to/contact person/employee/customer) which is based on the business partner ROLE concept.... anyway...you can control the allowed activity based on different authorization objects.....
    another example is business transaction processing...which can be launched by:
    a very generic transaction code: CRMD_ORDER
    transaction category related transaction codes :e.g.
          > CRMD_BUS2000126 for activity management
          > CRMD_BUS200115 for Sales processes
    Again...allowed activity is not controlled by the tcode, but on authorization object level...
    3) As of the new WEBCLIENT UI (which is valid as of release CRM2006s/CRM2007/CRM7.0) SAP also invented an extra authorization layer, which is UI COMPONENT LEVEL and logical links....  controlled by object UIU_COMP.
    However, they also introduced the BUSINESS ROLE Concept (e.g; SALESPRO/MARKETINGPRO/...) which defines actually the functionalities, navigation bar, screen configuration, logical links you can use/see within the new WEBclient UI.
    Another thing is that instead of using TRANSACTION CODES, as of these new releases, you are actually using 'external services'....so you do not authorize on tcodes basically....but the logic between tcodes and external services in relation to the authorization objects that are checked is more or less the same....
    STANDARD authorization setup in the new WEBUI client is therefore controlled by both backend authorizations (not UIU component related) and the UIU_COMP (restricting access to workcenters/logical links/...)
    4) Additionally SAP also provides a concept called ACE (which stand for ACCES CONTROL ENGINE)....
    This requires a bit of customizing...and the rest is more or less pure customer development, as you will create your own methods where you'll define a logic which dynamically will verify what kind of access you have for an object....
    You should now that ACE is actually implemented on top of your 'normal' sap crm security setup....
    cheers
    Davy Pelssers

  • Return date of Security Deposit blank on move out bill

    Dear All,
    When a move out is done on a contract account, if no final bill is issued, the security deposit is released and the return date of the security deposit is filled with the move out date. Else if a final invoice is issued, the the security deposit is released but the return date remains blank.
    Is there some special configuration to be done so that the return date is populated in both cases.
    I am actually working on a statistics report for security deposits, FPD1 gives only summary and FPD2 is limited by BP or Contract Account. No dates or status available to restrict the search.
    Thanks and Regards
    Malini

    Note 1089152 corrects this problem

  • Security Framework in Discoverer

    Hi
    I am using Discoverer for reporting.And currently we are planning to incorporate security feature using Discoverer.Since I am new to Discoverer,Can anyone please suggest some Security features in Discoverer (any links or document about it.)
    We have listed down some parameters on which would like to build security Framefork.
    1) Report level security
    2) Data Level security
    3) EUL/Business Area Access
    4) Allowing user to view the report but restricting it to modify existing report(i.e removing conditions,some fields etc.)
    Not sure whether its feasible with discoverer or not.
    Please advice.
    Thanks

    1) Report level security
    Using Discoverer you can control access to specific workbooks, so that only certain users have access to the workbooks you want. Also, you can also share workbooks to database roles, and not just users.
    2) Data Level security
    Discoverer relies on the Oracle database to implement data security. What this means is that the Discoverer user connecting to Discoverer to run a workbook that queries the database for data will never be able to get to data that they do not have access/privilege to. For e.g. is user 'A' is not authorized to view data in table 'B' then user 'A' cannot use Discoverer to get to the data in table 'B'.
    3) EUL/Business Area Access
    This can be done using Discoverer Administrator - using the relevant menu options. Users can either have full access to the Business area, or you can specify whether a user has access to a business area to begin with. Secondly, using the Privileges dialog, you can furthermore specify whether a user has 'Administration' privileges or not, and even as an administrator whether the user can create new BAs, summaries, manage scheduled workbooks, etc...
    4) Allowing user to view the report but restricting it to modify existing report(i.e removing conditions,some fields etc.)
    Using Discoverer Administrator, you can also specify whether users have privileges like drill-out, save a workbook, etc... If for example a user does not have drill privileges, then the drill icon is not displayed when running the workbook.
    For concepts like how to setup row/column level security, you should consult the Oracle database documentation:
    See the Oracle® Label Security Administrator's Guide, 10g Release 2 (10.2), Part Number B14267-01 at http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/network.102/b14267/toc.htm
    and
    Oracle® Database Security Guide, 10g Release 2 (10.2), Part Number B14266-01 at http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/network.102/b14266/toc.htm
    Thanks
    Abhinav

  • Security deposit payment

    Hi,
    My requirement is to account the payments to a security deposit separately till the time it is not released.
    Details as below.
    1. When the security deposit is cleared by a payment, the payment item should reflect in G/L account X001.
    2. When the security deposit is released, the payment amount should go to G/L X002 debitting the account X001 by the equivalent amount.
    Step 1 can be achieved through the config of EK01, however can anyone please suggest if there is something which helps to achieve step 2? That means when a security deposit is released it should be transferred to another G/L account?
    Thanks a lot in advance.

    Hi Dhiraj,
    Going through your Step2, it seems that you are looking for a journal entry to be done, once the SD payment is released so that the initial GL A/c, (say X001) is settled and the balance is transferred to a new GL A/c (Say X002).
    I guess you are performing the SD release only at the time of Final Invoicing and not on an ad-hoc basis through FPSEC2.
    If so, then you can go to the following SPRO config-
    IMG--->SAP Utilities--->Invoicing--->Invoice Processing-->Item Selection in Invoicing--->Item selection in Account maintenance/Define Sub Items
    Select the Clearing type, either R42/R43 (depending on your Business Process) and click on "Item Selection for Bill Printout (Sub Items)".
    Select the SD payment main\sub combination (as per standard SAP-0020/0010) and check the box "Transfer to Credit memo/Receivable for Consumption Billing"
    This checkbox controls whether a document which has already been posted should be transferred to a consumption billing credit memo/receivable in invoicing.
    The newly generated document inherits the due date of the invoicing document.
    Hope it helps..
    Thanks,
    Amlan

  • I want to run the most secure and most stable version, not the latest

    ''locking - duplicate - https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/859982''
    Apologies if this is a duplicate but I got no confirmation when I clicked on the link sent to my e-mail Inbox.
    I have several PCs and support many local business owners.
    Neither I nor they need the latest gadgets and gizmos - what we all need is stability and security. I always keep all users on versions of code that have passed from bleeding-edge development into their support and maintenance phase.
    I am wanting to download the latest release of version 4 (of Firefox) but missed it due to your rapid switch to v5.
    I did several searches and could not find it on your site - can I suggest that it should be there to satisfy your supporters who moved from MS IE due to the dreadful security issues - esp. Active-X over your early-years.

    Thanks for the rapid response - if I had found the information you have provided (v4 discontinued) I would have modified what I had asked for as below.
    Where is the link to the latest releases of Firefox version 3 as that is obviously what I should be using. I always download software (inc. add-ons / extensions) rather than allow automatic update because I can then restore to a known secure and stable release when needed.
    Last minor point - I just did a Google search for LTS (and software) as I had never come across the acronym in 35 years of software development - what does LTS expand into?
    Again thanks for the help so far... BR.

  • Using OID 9.0.4.x  as security provider  for OC4J 10.1.3

    If you upgrade OC4J to release 10.1.3 (needed for new releases of Jdeveloper)
    and you your Metadata respository is based on 9.0.4.x, you can use Oracle® Containers for J2EE Security Guide 10g Release 3 (10.1.3) B14429-01 Chapter 6 for the steps needed.
    The section Considerations for 9.0.4.x Infrastructure: Access Control List Settings describes that some content in OID needs to be replace to cater for 10.1.3 and ldap ldif file structure is given with instruction on how to run it
    We tried it exactly as instructed (Show below)
    ID management realm (for example, dc=PALCO,dc=com), then execute the steps that follow.
    dn: cn=JAZNContext,cn=Products,cn=OracleContext,%s_MgmtRealmDN%
    changetype: modify
    replace: orclaci
    orclaci: access to entry
    by group= "cn=JAZNAdminGroup,cn=Groups,cn=JAZNContext,cn=Products,cn=OracleContext"
    (browse, add, delete)
    by group= "cn=IASAdmins,cn=Groups,cn=OracleContext,%s_MgmtRealmDN%
    added_object_constraint=(objectclass=orclApplicationEntity) (add, delete, browse)
    by * (none)
    orclaci: access to attr=(*)
    by group= "cn=JAZNAdminGroup,cn=Groups,cn=JAZNContext,cn=Products,cn=OracleContext"
    (search, read, write, compare)
    by group= "cn=IASAdmins,cn=Groups,cn=OracleContext,%s_MgmtRealmDN%"
    (read, search, write, compare)
    by * (none)
    and then running the ldapmodify program
    ldapmodify -c -a -p 389 -h localhost -D cn=orcladmi -w xxxxxx \
    -f int_ammar.ldif
    produces errors
    ldap_modify: additional info: INVALID ACI is access to entry by group
    There has to be something error with the syntax error is providing in the Doc
    Ammar Sajdi, Oracle consultant
    www.e-ammar.com
    oraclejo.blogspot.com
    www.palco-me.com
    Amman

    Finally, i found out what the problem is
    First of all , make sure that no new line exists between LDAP LDIF directives, additionally, make sure that you close the double quotation for CN where even it appears as the script provided does not close all of them when appropriate
    you can fine an already modified file in my website shortly
    http://www.e-ammar.com/Oracle.htm
    This will hopefully save you time
    Regards
    Ammar Sajdi

  • Rest Security Framework using Internal user

    We are planning to use ATG 10.0.3 REST framework to expose web APIs for other channels as REST services. These services will be called in session context and will be used to place an Order for registered external user.
    We would like to use REST Security framework to restrict certain method / repository access to certain client only. There are 2 set of users involved here in one session 1. The client making the Rest service call and we would like to restrict access by these client. 2. The end user, who will login and create order and checkout. But we don't want to setup access rule based on the external customer profile.
    How should we approach this scenario? Any suggestion.

    1) Report level security
    Using Discoverer you can control access to specific workbooks, so that only certain users have access to the workbooks you want. Also, you can also share workbooks to database roles, and not just users.
    2) Data Level security
    Discoverer relies on the Oracle database to implement data security. What this means is that the Discoverer user connecting to Discoverer to run a workbook that queries the database for data will never be able to get to data that they do not have access/privilege to. For e.g. is user 'A' is not authorized to view data in table 'B' then user 'A' cannot use Discoverer to get to the data in table 'B'.
    3) EUL/Business Area Access
    This can be done using Discoverer Administrator - using the relevant menu options. Users can either have full access to the Business area, or you can specify whether a user has access to a business area to begin with. Secondly, using the Privileges dialog, you can furthermore specify whether a user has 'Administration' privileges or not, and even as an administrator whether the user can create new BAs, summaries, manage scheduled workbooks, etc...
    4) Allowing user to view the report but restricting it to modify existing report(i.e removing conditions,some fields etc.)
    Using Discoverer Administrator, you can also specify whether users have privileges like drill-out, save a workbook, etc... If for example a user does not have drill privileges, then the drill icon is not displayed when running the workbook.
    For concepts like how to setup row/column level security, you should consult the Oracle database documentation:
    See the Oracle® Label Security Administrator's Guide, 10g Release 2 (10.2), Part Number B14267-01 at http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/network.102/b14267/toc.htm
    and
    Oracle® Database Security Guide, 10g Release 2 (10.2), Part Number B14266-01 at http://download-east.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/network.102/b14266/toc.htm
    Thanks
    Abhinav

  • Security updates

    hi all.
    read somewhere that new security updates were released by apple today. however, the software update for the imac doesnt download anything.
    guess none is intended for the imac intel?
    tks,
    tomas

    sorry, delete my above post.
    just now security update appeared on software update!
    tomas

  • Error: (Ilegal operation on Wrapped Native Prototype Object) after new security update

    I have Firefox 22 installed on a HP Presario Quad 64, running Windows 7 Home Version. Firefox had been running and updating well until I received the latest Security Update (20130618035212) released on the 3rd of June, 2013, and it installed today. After installation the Error: Illegal Operation on Wrapped Native Prototype Object) Pops up several times when first opened, and once or twice on every operation I do, on any page thereafter. I don't know what the reason for this error, or what the update may be badly interacting with. I noticed that there seems to be no way of selectively removing a security update from within Firefox it's-self, can I remove it from windows Add/Remove to see if that's the cause instead of removing the Firefox it's self and re-installing. I haven't had a problem with Firefox for such a long time now that I became far too relaxed in my security of it, that I have to admit it caught me off guard. Any help, or information would be fantastic.
    Sincerely
    Rick M.

    Hello,
    '''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
    ''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
    * You can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
    * Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
    ''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
    '''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
    ''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
    ''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
    Thank you.

Maybe you are looking for

  • XFX 5770 causing problems at start-up (I think)

    In order to purchase and use Final Cut Pro X, I purchased from MacMall the XFX 5770 HD video card and installed it in my machine. I trusted that, because it was coming from MacMall and because I'd read that the graphics update brought greater compati

  • How to maintain the hover state of a button while it is in it's current page?

    Hi, I'm just a beginner in actionscript 3. I have this code about navigation using movieclip buttons. I just made the currently selected button disabled when it is in the current page but I just cant figure out on how to maintain it in its hover stat

  • Help with setting up a Personal Hotspot on iPhone 4

    I have been trying to set up a Personal Hotspot on my iPhone 4 updated to IOS7. I can connect to WiFi ok but not cellular data.

  • Security and authentication

    The bottom line is I don't know anything about either of these two areas. I've always been a client side interactive developer and designer, handing off the real backend work to developers in that field. FMS is finally plunging me into this area, as

  • User exit for Tcode LI20

    Hi all, I need to find a user exit for T Code LI20, to update the Z tables. Thanks in advance Sree