Purchase price variance line item - not to be posted in Parallel currency

Hi All,
Scenario:
Transaction currency - SGD
Local Currency - INR
Parallel Currency 1 (LC2) - Group currency - USD
Parallel Currency 2 (LC3) - Global Company currency - INR
Import PO - MIGO - MIRO
PO is raised in foreign currency.
Material master price control is maintained in 'S'.
While doing MIGO, I am getting following accounting entries:
Stock a/c Dr.
GR/IR a/c Cr.
Price variance* a/c Dr.
*The price varaince is because of difference in my material price as per material master and PO.
If I go and check in FBL3N, I can see all the line items in Transaction, Local currency and 2 Parallel currencies.
My query is, In SAP is it possible to avoid Price variance line item posting to Parallel currencies.
To my knowledge I know that it is not possible to avoid a single line to post it to Parallel currencies.
Thanks in advance.

This is the answer from OSS
Dear Customer,
the system works as designed.
When Material Ledger is activated, price differences are always
generated under the circumstances you have described. The reason is
that when material ledger is activated, price differences must not be
included into the stock changes value, otherwise the system would
not be able to calculate an actual price.
When Material Ledger is activated, the customizing setting
for handling price differences in the subcontracting process has no
effect.
Best regards,
Santiago Lorite
AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology u2013 Logistics

Similar Messages

  • Tds line item not simulating while posting as reference with FBR2

    Dear All
    When I am posting an Invoice using previous document as reference with Tcode FBR2 WTax line Item not simulating, but while I am posting  without reference  i.e. with Tcode FB60 it is simulating, this problem i am facing in production server from this fiscal year but in development server it is working properly.
    what is the possible cause and how to solve this problem.

    Hi,
    For WHT cannot be deducted by using F-02 OR FB01.  It seems system is using the same transaction in background and not FB60 and hence tds is bnot getting deducted.
    Regards
    Milind Sonalkar

  • Variance Line items not showing in KOB3 - Previous Orders.

    Hello CO Experts,
    Because of not selecting 'Write Line items' check box in Variance key (OKV1), KOB3 is not showing any line items even though variance posting exist.
    After selecting  'Write Line items' check box in Variance key (OKV1), any variance posting there on will be recorded to display as line items in KOB3.
    But my question is how to make this line item display effective for variances posted before selecting 'Write Line items' check box in Variance key (OKV1).
    Thanks in Advance
    -Sahas

    Hello Declan,
    thank you for confirmaiton.
    I think SAP would have provided some solution (may be a program) to make this line item display effective for variances posted before selecting 'Write Line items' check box in Variance key (OKV1).
    -Regards
    Sahas

  • Miro line item not generated

    Dear All,
    I have facing one issue at the time posting in MIRO.
    I post one of migo doc in date 03/01/2010 , the entry is:( with same material )
    Post key   description  amt                               curr.( USD)
    89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     32100.00
    96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     32100.00
    40              Purchase RM-IMP                            32100.00
    50              Purchase offset.                             32100.00
    And Miro Posting on date 23/03/2010
    Post key   description  amt                               curr.( USD)
    31           xyz Vendor                                    32100.00
    86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                    32100.oo
    89           Stk.RM -IMP                                    -
    40           Purchase RM-IMP                          -
    50           Purchase offset.                           -
    But when I post for another po in migo on date 03/01/2010
    Post key   description  amt                               curr.( USD)
    89              Stk.RM -IMP                                     76800.00
    96              PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                     76800.00
    40              Purchase RM-IMP                            76800.00
    50              Purchase offset.                             76800.00
    and miro posting on date 19/02/2010
    Post key   description  amt                               curr.( USD)
    32            yz Vendor                                       76800.00
    86           PL.VND.RM.IMP GR/IR                      76800.00
    89           Stk.RM -IMP                                      Line item not generated
    40           Purchase RM-IMP                             Line item not generated
    50           Purchase offset.                              Line item not generated
    Can any one tell why line item not generated for miro posting .
    Regards
    Milind

    Hi,
    The extra line items will be generated when there are any exchange rate diffrences are there then only shows.
    Other wise it wont show those extra line items
    Please check group currency , global currency etc. for  your extra line items

  • Purchase price variance in subcontracting order

    Our customer has the following scenario:
         Purchase account is posted with the value of stock subsequently purchase price variance is a legal account
         Material ledger is active
         Inventories are managed with standard price for each material code
         Latin method management of inventories post stock values on managerial account
    In good receipt with a subcontracting order, in case of purchase price variance, legal account of purchase price variance is posted generating a wrong reconciliation between managerial and legal posting.
    Example
    The subcontractor is a co packer that assembles material A to produce material B
    Material  A has a standard price of   3
    Material B has a standard price of     5
    If Co packer fees have a value     of     2 no purchase price variance occurs during good receipt, as a matter of fact :
    (Co packing fees) 2 + (Material A)  3 = (Material B) 5
    Else if co packer fees have a value of 3 a purchase price variance of 1 occurs and itu2019s posted using transaction key u201CPRDu201D. On FI the following document is posted:
    Legenda  : L stands for legal account , M stands for managerial account
    (L) Co packing Fees                                         3
    (L) Invoice to receive                                     3
    (L)Purchase price variance                            1
    (M) Consumption Material A                           3
    (M) Stock  Material              A                            3
    (M) Stock Material               B                            5
    (M) Production Confirmation  Material B       6
    In this scenario Purchase price variance should be a managerial account, but  transaction key is PRD  and  changing the account would affect every posting.

    This is the answer from OSS
    Dear Customer,
    the system works as designed.
    When Material Ledger is activated, price differences are always
    generated under the circumstances you have described. The reason is
    that when material ledger is activated, price differences must not be
    included into the stock changes value, otherwise the system would
    not be able to calculate an actual price.
    When Material Ledger is activated, the customizing setting
    for handling price differences in the subcontracting process has no
    effect.
    Best regards,
    Santiago Lorite
    AGS Primary Support, Business Suite & Technology u2013 Logistics

  • Pipeline Materials: Purchase Price Variances

    Hi,
    Can anybody please guide me on how to handle Purchase Price Variances of Pipeline Materials. As pipeline materials doesn't have any POs and invoices, how is it possible to post the PPV so that the variances are recorded in material ledger.
    Best Regards,
    Ganesh Perumalla

    Hi,
    I could see from SAP Notes and Help the following:
    If the consignment prices have changed since the original goods receipt, post the credit memo in Financial Accounting. Clear the invoice and the credit memo in Financial Accounting.
    But the above Credit memo doesn't update the Material Ledger.
    SAP Notes advices to use the function modules FU EXIT_RMVKON00_001, FU EXIT_RMVKON00_002 and FU EXIT_RMVKON00_003.
    If somebody already worked on this scenario, could you please provide any details.
    Best Regards,
    Ganesh Perumalla
    <u><b>FU EXIT_RMVKON00_001</b></u>
    Text
    Customer Exit: Consignment Settlement - Change Invoice Data
    Functionality
    Report RMVKON00 (Settle Consignment/Pipeline Liabilities) calls this customer-specific function module.
    Report RMVKON00 calculates the invoice data from the withdrawals to be settled and calls the interface to Financial Accounting (function module AC_DOCUMENT_CREATE). Before calling the function module, you can change the following data:
    Document header (internal table T_BKPF), contains only one line
    Document items (internal table T_BSEG), the first line contains the vendor line item, the following lines contain the invoice items
    The following information is available:
    The company code (I_BUKRS) and the vendor (I_LIFNR), for which you are creating the document.
    Parameters
    I_BUKRS
    I_LIFNR
    T_BKPF
    T_BSEG
    T_BSET
    T_RKWA
    Exceptions
    ERROR
    Function Group
    XM08
    <u><b>FU EXIT_RMVKON00_002</b>____________________________________________________</u>
    Text
    Customer Exit: Consignment Settlement - Fill RKWA at Goods Withdrawal
    Functionality
    Report RMVKON00 (Settle Consignment/Pipeline Liabilities) calls this customer-specific function module and fills structure CI_RKWA.
    In report RMVKON00, database table RKWA is changed at settlement. In table RKWA, structure CI_RKWA exists as an include that can incorporate customer-specific fields. The system can fill structure CI_RKWA at goods withdrawal or at settlement. The system uses this function module to fill structure CI_RKWA at the time of settlement.
    The RKWA entry for the withdrawal (parameter I_RKWA) is available for filling structure CI_RKWA.
    For technical reasons, it is not possible to return structure CI_RKWA, instead, the whole of table RKWA is returned using the parameter E_RKWA. However,changes to table RKWA that are not part of structure CI_RKWA, are ignored by report RMVKON00.
    Notes
    The system only adopts structure CI_RKWA if the value 'X' is passed on at parameter E_CHECK.
    Parameters
    I_RKWA
    E_RKWA
    E_CHECK
    Exceptions
    ERROR
    Function Group
    XM08

  • Net Price in PO Item not updating for Item Category "D"

    In purchase order with line item category "D" Service, upon first input of gross price in Service tab, Net Price in line item was updated successfully, but upon changing the gross price again in service tab, Net Price in line item is not updating anymore.
    I am using the condition type MWVS for tax calculation and a custom condition type ZPBX for the computation of Net Price = Gross Price - Tax. For ZPBX I used the calculation routine 82 (xkwert = komp-kzwi2 - xworkg.). For other item category, this is working fine. I am only having a problem in item category "D".
    I tried to debug and found out that upon entering a new gross price in service tab, the system is calculating the routine 82 first before even the gross price from service tab was transferred to the condition in line item. Because of that the routine 82 is calculating with the previous or old value in table KOMP since the gross price from service tab is not yet transfered to this table.
    Can anyone help me with this? What am I doing wrong?
    Thanks!

    Hi,
    Check which condition type used for Service PO pricing. Now use t. code: M/06 and enter that condition type and select check boxes of Amount/percent, Value, Qty Relation in Changes which can be made segment and save.
    Also select check box of u201CQty Conversionu201D in Control-2 segment and save.
    Now create service PO, change Price in service item level and see how NET PRICE changing.
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • How to obtain last purchased price of an item

    How can i obtain the last purchased price of an item? There seems to be an 'LastPurPrc' field in the OITM table, but this does not seem to be exposed in the DI api. The last purchased pricelist is an 'internal' pricelist so cannot be used in the pricelists selection. Is there another way then just retrieving the value with a direct database Sql query?

    Hi,
    There is,  but is long :-D.
    You could check the purchase invoices by key in descendant order and check if the lines had the item, then check the price in the line to get the purchase price.
    Hope it helps,
    -M

  • CST amount is debit in the purchase price variance

    Hi
    We are maintaining std in the materials master
    and price procedure as taxinj
    While doing migo, the CST amount is debit in the purchase price variance and credit in the GR/IR RM,
    We need to debit the CST amount in the in the Raw material account
    what are the settings i need to carry out Plz give suitable suggestions.
    in tax code we are not maintining any G/L account for the CST
    Edited by: K. Raghuram on May 19, 2009 12:48 PM
    Edited by: K. Raghuram on May 19, 2009 1:02 PM

    Hi Raghuram,
    I think,the only possiblity for this to happen is due to the standard Price in the Mterial Mater you are using.
    Means in the Material Master ,the Price key is a standard pricing.
    So ,when ever you do a GRN ,the PO value will go and hit the Material account upto to the Standard price maintained in the material Master.
    if the amount is more than it ,then amount difference will hit the Price variance account.
    so in your case ,the CST is inventorised one ,i believe.. so that is the reason it is behaving so.
    if there is somethig else required.provide a clear insight of the Problem.
    Regards
    Anjanna

  • Enter Text in Price difference line item in MIRO

    Hello,
    My user wants to enter text in price difference account line item in MIRO. I tried to do it in MIRO simulation by doubl click on line item. But it does not show as we normally see in FI documents.
    Please advise how can I enter text in price difference line item while doing MIRO. Since this account gets posted automatically.
    Regards,
    Tapan

    Hi,
    You can create substitution with exit in GGB1/ OBBH
    In exit, give a popup for this price difference line item and in that popup user can enter the text and then fill that text in the line item.
    Your ABAper should be able to do it.
    Regards,
    SDNer

  • Variance calculation repport (KKS2) different to variance line items (KOB3)

    Hi, need your help.
    I´ve run variance calculation (KKS2) for one production order, one target cost version and it has calculated correctly all cost element variances. However, when I display variance line items (KOB3) for this order with the same target cost version used in KKS2, calculation is´t correct for all cost element and if I compare it with KKS2 repport, it displays different values. Does anyone know why?
    some details that may help:
    WIP is customize
    The company I´am working for had activated "write line Items" (OKV1) after the golive,
    Scrap check box is activate in variance key,
    All variance categories are activate,
    etcetera
    Thank you for your help.
    Regards,
    André

    Hi
    I would suggest raise an OSS msg then.. Because i dont see any possible reason why this could happen
    In my case, the only discrepancy I found was variance doc was posted to FI and not to COPA because the user did not execute variance calculation in update mode.. So, variance got posted in FI, but not in COPA...
    But the posted values always matched in my case,,,
    Do update us incase you find solution
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Standard SAP report for purchase price variance

    Hi All,
    I need to know if there is a standard SAP report that shows the purchase price variance.
    Thanks,
    Regards

    Hi Ritika,
    There is no standard report available to compare purchase order price cost and standard cost of a material.
    You can check if FBL3N helps to resolve your purpose or not. Or else you have to make a customized report with the help of ABAP'er on the informations based on the following tables.
      MBEW
            EKKO
            EKPO
            EKBE
           MKPF       
            MSEG                  
            KEKO
            KEPH,                        
            BKPF                                            
            BSEG                                          
            LFA1         
    Thanks,
    Vasanthan

  • Purchase Price Variance (Standard Costing) with Intercompany

    We are missing Intercompany transactions in Purchase price variance report. Is there a setup which let's us include these transactions to be captured by PPV report
    We do have standard costing in all Organizations

    Finally got this answered from Oracle Support below is what they said. Does not make sense but atleast we have an answer
    In principle the internal requisition hits the interorg variance account which is defined at the shipping network and is different from purchase price variance(PPV) account of the organization. So this is not included in PPV report. PPV report is only meant for purchase orders.
    Best practice would be to define different account for PPV and interorg variance. Use PPV report to match PPV account with GL and use material distribution account detail report for Interorg variance.
    If the customer defines PPV and Interorg variance account as the same then the workarounds would be :
    1) Use material distribution account detail report.
    Or
    2) In R12 use SLA account balance reports

  • Purchase Price Variance Report completes with error status

    Dear Members,
    I am using R12.1.3 Vision Instance.
    When I ran the report Purchase Price Variance Report, it completed with an error.
    The error message is :-
    Enter Password:
    REP-1212: Object 'F_h_report_date' is not fully enclosed by its enclosing object 'Body'.
    REP-0069: Internal error
    REP-57054: In-process job terminated:Terminated with error:
    REP-1212: Object 'F_h_report_date' is not fully enclosed by its enclosing object 'Body'.
    Can any one please guide me in resolving this issue?
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards.

    HI,
    Check the below references, it would address your issue
    Purchase Price Variance (Xml) Post Process Failed [ID 1341213.1]
    Report Error Rep-1212: Object 'F_report_date' [ID 567886.1]
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • OSP resource cost debited in 'Purchase Price Variance'

    Hi all
    Can you help me how to fix the issue of 'OSP resource cost' debited in 'Purchase Price Variance' instead of WIP cost.
    Please note that the 'Standard Cost' in resource definition is disabled.
    Note that the costing followed is 'Average'.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    regards
    Raffath

    Raffath,
    You veriy the rate in both resource window and in P.O, there may be a scope that P.O may be ammended and Resource rate may not be changed, this difference will be affected in PPV account.
    Regards,
    Jaan

Maybe you are looking for