QOS for PCoIP on a 3850

Teradici advises that packet loss be kept below 1% in PCoIP. I know that UDP is not guaranteed to arrive in order but, again according to Teradici, out of order packets may be considered as dropped packets. One suggestion is to turn on WRED on the 3850 but version 03.03.04SE of the IOS doesn't support this.
How can I enable this?

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
Well, if the 3850 doesn't support WRED, then the answer to your question for how to enable is you don't.
That noted, it's unclear how WRED activation, if available, will help guarantee UDP packets are delivered in order, or how it will guarantee PCoIP packet loss be kept below 1%.
What you might do on a 3850, is place your PCoIP traffic into a class that guarantees sufficient bandwidth that PCoIP traffic won't be dropped. (Basically you should treat PCoIP somewhat like VoIP bearer or interactive video, i.e. delay and drop sensitive.)
Out-of-order delivery isn't a possibility unless you have multiple paths and/or reorder transmission of packets part of the same flow. Network devices usually, by default, will not resequence a flow's packets. The only time that "normally" happens is if there's a change in the logical or physical topology while packets are "in flight".

Similar Messages

VoIP QoS for Site-to-Site Tunnel

Hi all,
I need some help with setting up QoS for VoIP between two Cisco ASA 5505 with Site-to-Site VPN.
There is no need for bandwith reservation, only DSCP 46 (EF) should be highest and DSCP 26 second highest queue and the rules should only apply to a site-to-site VPN.
Usually i try to configure the ASAs via ASDM and found out in the Cisco Documentations how to setup QoS for the DSCP bits with a Service Policy and how to set up QoS for a Site-to-Site VPN (Service Policy Rule -> Traffic Match). But how do i configure the QoS for a DSCP bit to only apply to a Site-to-Site Tunnel? And how do i configure different priorities for the two DSCP bits, is this defined by the order of Service Policies?
The QoS has to be enabled on both ASAs for the inside interface?
Thanks in advance
Tobias

Hi Collin,
ok so from the document i think this has to be added on both ASAs to prioritize DSCP 46. Could you have a quick look if this is all i need?
class-map voice_traffic
match dscp ef
class-map data
match tunnel-group <Tunnel Name>
match flow ip destination-address
policy-map voice_policy
class voice_traffic
priority
class Data
police output 200000 37500
service-policy voice_policy interface outside
But there is still the question how two configure another DSCP bit for priority 2, I could not find out how this is done, neither CLI nor ASDM. Any ideas?
BR
Tobias

Enabling QoS for enterprise on a router

Hello,
I plan to enable QOS for enterprise on a customer's router between three (3) to five (5) days. Will this have an impact on the router for the said days?
Thanks you in advance,
Martin.

Generally speaking no, qos will not impact any operations at all. It will just classify, mark, police/shape, guarantee bandwidth according to the criteria you specify.
But it will not cause any performance issues.
-Terry
Please rate all helpful posts and mark the thread as answered if you have no other queries.

QoS for App-V

Hello,
I'm currently configuring new 3750X switches.
I must implement QoS on the stack. The QoS must be the following:
VOIP Class (50%)
App-V Class (40%)
Movie Class (10%)
How I can do this (in particular for AppV)? I do the following for the moment:
class-map match-any VOIP
match protocol voice
match dscp ef
match protocol sip
match protocol skype
match protocol rtp audio
match protocol rtp video
exit
class-map AppV
exit
class-map Movie
match protocol rtp video
exit
policy-map BandwidthTraffic
class VOIP
priority percent 50
set dscp ef
class AppV
bandwidth remaining percent 40
class Movie
bandwidth remaining percent 10
interface Gig1/0/3
ip nbar protocol-discovery
service-policy input BandwidthTraffic
Anyone can says me if it's correct or not? And why?
Thank you for your help.
Florent

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
It appears you've some router QoS. 3750X QoS is quite different for egress as you're limited to working with four egress queues. I don't recall 3750X supporting NBAR.
Suggest you read the configuration guide's chapter on QoS, for you 3750X IOS version, and then post questions as necessary. (My concern is, 3750X QoS is so different, it wouldn't be helpful to suggest a QoS configuration until you had a basic understanding of the 3750 QoS architecture and features.)

QoS for Video Data

Hello Together,
I like to implement a QoS Policy class to prioritise "Windows Netmeeting". Does somebody know the well known port number and can somebody recommend an bandwidth that i should provide at least to this class ?
Thanks in advance.

As you can find in the Netmeeting IP ports table below, netmeeting uses dynamic ports for Video streaming. So I am not really sure how you can configure QoS for the same.
Anyone has a good tip to achieve this.?
Port Purpose
389 Internet Locator Server (TCP)
522 User Location Server (TCP)
1503 T.120 (TCP)
1720 H.323 call setup (TCP)
1731 Audio call control (TCP)
Dynamic H.323 call control (TCP)
Dynamic H.323 streaming (RTP over UDP)

Determination of QOS for IDOC messages

Hi,
sending IDOC from SAP to XI, and then to an external system using a JDBC adapter, the QOS for messages is automatically set to EO: anyone knows if it's possible to change this parameter (I need EOIO)? Where can I find documentation about setting/changing QOS?
Thanks for any suggestion.
Simona

I had the same scenario as Simona and at the end it turned out to be pretty simple (if WAS >= 6.40). On the sender system (SAP ERP) in partner profiles -> in the outbound parameters for the message type, you need to check Queue Processing parameter. When you do this an aditionalfield will apear: Rule name. This determines which rule will be used as QueueID. Rules are customized in WE85 where you can assign your own function modules to custom rule names.
Once I assigned appropriate rule (for test I used FIRST_16_OF_MESTYP) xml message was automaticaly set to
<SAP:QualityOfService>ExactlyOnceInOrder</SAP:QualityOfService>
and the message got the QueueID XBQO* (in SXMB_ADMIN).
Again, if WAS is WAS >= 6.40 you don't need to set up IDXQUEUE table.
Regards,
Elvis

Hyper-V 2012 R2 QoS for a specific set of VMs?

I'm trying to figure out how to setup SCVMM 2012 R2 with a Logical Switch to support QoS for a specific set up VMs. Specifically, I have a subnet that will have a variety of VMs running, but within that subnet I have a handful of VMs that need a unique
software QoS setting. Is this possible?
Blog: www.derekseaman.com, VMware vExpert 2012/2013

Hi VderekS，
In addition please refer to the following link ：
http://blogs.technet.com/b/privatecloud/archive/2013/04/03/configure-nic-teaming-and-qos-with-vmm-2012-sp1-by-kristian-nese.aspx
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

How to setup QoS for IP/Mac Address WRVS4400N

I need some help setting up QoS for two Cisco/Linksys devivces on my network.
Network devices are Comcast SB6120 modem into WRVS4400n (v2.0.2.1 firmware) that divides into one 24 port gigabit Netgear unmanaged switch, 1 port into AT&T Cisco Microcell, 1 port to HP Officejet 7700 wired printer. Unmanaged switch has approx 10 devices attached (including another 8 port unmanaged gigabit switch). 3 static leases are defined for the network for three devices (HP OJ 7700 printer, Cisco/Linksys PAP2 VOIP adapter, windows home server v1. DHCP is handled by WRVS4400n. Comcast service provides 12mbps of service upstream, 4mbps downstream.
Need to setup QoS for AT&T Microcell and PAP2 VOIP adapter. The real issue that I can't figure out how to configure is IP based priority access. I can do rate control for an IP address but can't figure out how to specify priority control for an IP.
Here are my the current config questions:
1. Bandwidth management page: For the microcell device plugged into port 1, do i set the default CoS to 4 or 1?
2. Bandwidth management page: Should the bandwidth management type be set to priority? I assume yes since I need to define the UDP/TCP ports for priority. The major issues here are
a) one of the ports the Microcell uses is secure https (TCP 443) which is could also be used by any other internet device.
b) can't specify priority for the PAP2, since it's behind the unmanaged 24 port switch
3. QoS setup page: Do I need just 2 queues (one for the port ID for the Microcell and one for the IP address of the Linksys adapter)?
4. QoS setup page: I assume I need to define DSCP for the unmanaged switch but not sure how to tie a queue to an IP address
4. QoS setup page: Shoud priority 0 be set for the most important queue (microcell) and the priority 1 CoS be for the VOIP adapter? Again, not sure about how to define priority by IP address.
5. DSCP setup page: As far as I can find, there's no documentation on how to setup this page.

That's what I do. I keep it simple, one calendar, one set of contacts.
iCloud is really the simplest way to go, as it will sync your (eventual) single Contacts and Calendar across all your devices.
I would:
Figure out which single calendar (in Calendar.app) and contacts (in Contacts.app) that you want to keep.
I'd make a backup of each one. For example,
in Contacts, File > Export... > Contacts Archive...
in Calendar, File > Export... > Calendar Archive...
Make a backup of the other calendar events and contacts that you want to save.
delete all the contacts and calendars from your phones and your iPad.
add the contacts and events from the backups to the single calendar in Calendar.app and your contacts in Contacts.app on your iMac. There is probably some way to export the contacts and events you are adding, and then combine them, but you could also just add them manually.
Then when you configure all your devices for iCloud, they will be all synced automatically.
Message was edited by: arthur

To configure a QoS for the attached topolgy

Dear friends,
I have to configure QoS for the attached topology with the following requirements, can any one please help me to do the same.
The minimum requirements are that 4 simultaneous VoIP calls need to be supported across the backbone, as well as a dedicated 10MBs of http traffic. Of the remainder of the bandwidth ftp traffic should be given a high priority. Make sure routing protocols are given a suitable priority level.
Thanks and expecting replies

Here are some questions that you'll need to answer, to get started.
What does the HTTP requirement mean? It is not possible to get 10 Megabytes per second on a 1.544 Megabit per second line.
What voice codec will be used on the IP Phones? This will determine how much bandwidth you need to allocate.
Next, read the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/qos/configuration/guide/12_4t/qos_12_4t_book.html
It's all in there. Unfortunately, it's a big topic, so there is a lot there.

Steps to enable lync 2013 QOS for audio

Experts,
I am on the way to enable lync 2013 QOS for audio only. We have already decided the ports ranges and make sure that its not override.
I just want to now, what will be happen to existing users using eEnterprise voice during i will lock the ports in servers and clients with GPO.
What is user impact during the implementation. I can't see any TechNet article for same. Do we have some recommended steps to follow to avoid any issue to existing users ??
Anil MCC 2011,ITIL V3,MCSA 2003,MCTS 2010, My Blog : http://messagingschool.wordpress.com

While you configure QoS nothing will happen with existing users or even existing calls. All that happens when you set a port range for Audio in the Lync is the next calls after the user picks up the change (client refreshes policies every 8 hours or
on log out/in) will us that port range.
If you have already decided on the port range you simply need to create the corresponding GPOs for both Server and Client as you mention. There is no harm in doing it mid-day unless you had defined ports before/specific firewall rules across the environment
for those ports - but that doesn't sound like the scenario here.
Thanks,
Richard
Richard Brynteson, Lync MVP | http://masteringlync.com | http://lyncvalidator.com

Per session QoS for LNS

We have some LNSs running 12.4 SP Services, running with the following config (qos specific lines and currently not working):
class-map match-all voice-signaling
match access-group 101
class-map match-all voice-traffic
match access-group 102
policy-map sub-policy
class voice-traffic
priority 240
class voice-signaling
bandwidth 16
policy-map XXX_qos-voice
class class-default
shape average 256000
fair-queue
service-policy sub-policy
interface Virtual-Template1
ip unnumbered Loopback0
ip mroute-cache
no peer default ip address
ppp authentication chap
no clns route-cache
access-list 101 remark -- SCCP/H323/MGCP/SIP --
access-list 101 permit tcp any any range 2000 2002
access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1720
access-list 101 permit tcp any any range 11000 11999
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 2427
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 4569
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 5036
access-list 101 permit udp any any eq 5060
access-list 102 remark -- RTP Traffic --
access-list 102 permit udp any any range 16384 32767
in the feature set for the IOS currently running it suggests this configuration should work, however it will not apply the policy via the Cisco-AVPair command (the command is visible via the debug AAA per user so radius is working, even when we test it by applying the service-policy to the actual virtual-template it errors saying it will only work on an MPL bundle. From what I have read it is suggested that even though this feature is supposed to work, it does not in practice and an upgrade to a feature set which includes QoS:per session shaping and queueing on LNS is needed.
If anyone has any experience of the or has any suggestion of if we can achieve our QoS for voice per session with the current IOS that would be great.

This feature is not related to the NPE type. This feature is performance impacting so you should do some tests to see if your NPE-400 can support the number of L2TP tunnels you want with this feature enabled. If it's not the case, you will have to upgrade your NPE.
HTH
Laurent.

Need help with QoS for WRT610N

My previous router was DIR-855 and I had opted for automatic option under QoS.
I changed the router in favour of WRT610N since DIR-855 never worked with SIP ALG enabled. I am happy WRT610N works with SIP ALG enabled.
On my one box I do lots of streaming media and I want to assign priority to this box. I also want to assign priority to my Gigaset S685IP phone as well.
I am told QoS works for upstream and not for downstream. Is this correct?
Can you please enlighten me how I set up QoS for one of my computers and IP phone?
Does WRT610N have the possibility to handle QoS automatically? If so, how I can tell it to do so?

Under QoS,you can set the Internet bandwidth priority for a variety of applications and devices. There are four levels priority: High, Medium, Normal, or Low. When you set priority, do not set all applications to High, because this will defeat the purpose of allocating the available bandwidth. If you want to select below normal bandwidth, select Low. Depending on the application, a few attempts may be needed to set the appropriate bandwidth priority.
There are four categories available...like... Applications, Online Games, MAC Address, Ethernet Port, or Voice Device.So you can setup the priority for X-Box and Voice device.

QOS for inbound traffic on 3560

Just to clarify what I'm asking.... I would like to make the congestion happen on our end and not on the ISP's equipment that I have no control over traffic shaping etc... I can't limit the bandwidth on the aggregate port that the metro e connects to (3750) because it would limit it for all locations and not just one. I think my only option is to limit the bandwidth on the switch at the location in question but I guess it would have to be on the ingress side, but then will it still drop packets according to dscp priority during congestion?

I have a little problem I hope you guys can help me with. We have a location that has a metro e hand off from our ISP. The same metro e also serves other locations and the aggregate point is at our main office which goes to a Cisco 3750 stack. The location in question has a single Cisco 3560 switch. We need to apply QOS for both inbound and outbound traffic to this location. I can tag the traffic to and from there but how do I make it so that the 3560 (or 3750) gets saturated and not the ISP connection for incoming traffic (so we decide what packets get dropped)? srr-queue bandwidth limit can't be used on the metro e port on the 3750 because this would limit all locations and not just the one.Should I put another small switch and put it in from of the 3560? This way I could use srr-queue and apply QOS to the egress queue.I hope this...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Problem with QOS for SIP on RV082

Hello,
I have problem with quality of VOIP call with Linskys RV082. Firmware is 2.0.0.19tm.
Router is configured as dual-wan , one port (WAN2) is for ADSL 8000/512kb and other one is (WAN1) SHDSL 8000/8000kb.
VOIP traffic from certain IP of LAN is routed to WAN2 (through protocol binding). We have quaranted QOS on ADSL by ISP.
Problem is that voice is dropping when we load WAN2 with other data connection. Last week i reload new firmware, restore default factory and configured router whole again. All was ok only for 1 day and then voice was dropping again. I mean that problem is at mark packets, because when I put VOIP PBX in front of behind router , QOS is working fine.
Can you help me? Is this know issue?
Thanks.
Jan Babak
Message was edited by: jabacomCZ

thank you for reply !!!
below is the show output :
ciscoasa# show priority-queue statistics outside_wan
Priority-Queue Statistics interface outside_wan
Queue Type = BE
Tail Drops = 0
Reset Drops = 0
Packets Transmit = 7971924
Packets Enqueued = 0
Current Q Length = 0
Max Q Length = 0
Queue Type = LLQ
Tail Drops = 0
Reset Drops = 0
Packets Transmit = 189321
Packets Enqueued = 0
Current Q Length = 0
Max Q Length = 0
ciscoasa#
so does the command look like, the one I should use instead of priority-queue outside_wan ??

Configuring QoS for FIOS Router MI-424WR: Traffic Priority and Shaping

Please only read on if you are an experienced internet user familiar with setting the advanced QoS and Firewall settings for the MI-424WR and make use of wireless adaptors from a PC to provide connectivity.
This is my first post and my first week since I moved from Time Warner Cable over to FIOS for iNet (plus HDTV and phone).     While all my services work, the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.   The average FIOS consumer is multimedia sensitive, but that is not so in my genre of internet consumer.   Here in lies the core of my reason for seeking help from like minded and experienced users in this community.
One of the main driving forces in my switching to FIOS was to improve my multiplayer gaming experience where ultra low ping latency and high upload data rates dramatically affect the quality of connection and thus gameplay.    The cable internet service from TimeWarner was providing solid 2MB/1MB down/up data rates with no issues like what Im having now with FIOS.   Again the reason for the switch was both financial and in hope of gaining better data rates and quality of service.   Now with FIOS Im getting about 24/15 down/up data rate on the Extreme FIOS 25/25 plan when measured from my house to Los Angeles server (50 miles away) via Speedtest.net or DslReports.com/tests.     Latency wise, the ping has gone down from 150 to 50ms when measured to my friends who I connect to online that are on the East coast.   The data rate and latency has greatly improved in going from Cable to FIOS.   So far, so good.
Where the problem shows up now, is that now I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.   For the average internet user that just streams multimedia or cruises on the net; this is probably undetectable or noticed.   I never had this problem over the same PCs connected wirelessly to my DLINK DGL-4500 Gaming Router when my ISP was TimeWarner's cable service.    Now, using the FIOS and MI-424WR router with everythings being the same; Im experiencing this degregation in quality of service.    Even putting the PC's IP into the DMZ doesnt make any difference, so it is not related to port forwarding.    The issue is squarely in the lap of FIOS and this router as delivered and configured.    This is where the "game" is a foot, and where I need expertise in an area Im new to.
I am not new to being hands on with inet trouble shooting asI have been setting up my own home network (I work from home over VPN to work) for decades; I would like to leverage the skills of those who are experts in the area that I think can address this issue.   That being QoS and the other device class mechanisms of this router.   Its my guess that this periodic hiccup can be minimized and even eliminated using these advanced features of this all-in-one TV/iNet/Tele router.
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:
a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
b. When I was on Cable with my own gaming router wirelessly DHCP connected to my PC and using port forwarding or using the DMZ.
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
I did read the manual and tried some QoS pritority and shaping and managed to reduce how often the hiccup occured, but I was just making guesses at the settings.   I put in the IP for the PCs I use for my gaming applications (which are very ping and jitter sensitive) into the QoS priority (value 7) and shaping GUI.    Im hoping someone with experience can tell me exactly how to use it and what settings to input.   Im not clear on the device and connection types offered in the QoS menus.
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.   But I assume this is on because it can be pinged by folks on the net to my WAN IP.
Here is the manual for the Verizon provided M424WR router (Current Version of firmware: 20.10.7)
download link
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:
Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
And why it matters to have a solid and stable inet connection for internet gaming? The hiccup causes slewing or jitter which equates to positional errors in the 3D world that ruins the smooth gameplay that is needed for high end gaming.
Heres a snapshot of me flying the wing of another flight simmer who is on the East coast and me on the West coast.
Click to view
Thank you in advance.
Thomas "AV8R"
MSEE

TMAS wrote:
the router as delivered and setup is not optimum for internet quality of service. Instead it was probably out of the box optimized for HDTV and telephone to satisfy most customers and reduce support overhead.
That's not accurate. VZ telephone service does not go through the Actiontec. Also, there are no default settings for QOS in the Actiontec since QOS is rarely needed with FIOS upload speeds.
TMAS wrote:I get an internet "hiccup" every 5-10 minutes that lasts about 1/2 to 2 seconds.
   You should not be experiencing periodic "hiccups". Something is clearly amiss.
TMAS wrote:
With that context being laid down, this hiccup doesnt show up if:a. I connect two PCs connected to the same ethernet hub of the MI-424WR (traffic just over the LAN and not WAN)
The hiccup does exist when:
a.  Going from internet through the MI-424WR to the wireless DHCP connected PC with port forwarding
b. Even putting the wireless DHCP connected PC into the MI-424WR's DMZ has no effect
Lets see. The issue shows up on a wireless connection, but not a wired connection. You think this is a QOS issue and not a wireless issue why? Have you tried changing the wireless channel? It very possible you have neighbors on the same channel. Is the DGL-4500 wireless still on? Could that be interfering?TMAS wrote:
Another thing, is I couldnt find settings for the turning on/off the ICMP echo.
The settting to enable/disable ICMP echo is on the Firewall/Remote Administration page.
TMAS wrote:
Here are the QoS traffic priority and shaping values Ive been experimenting with:Click to view QoS Traffic Priority
Click to view QoS Traffic Shaping
The traffic proirity settings you linked are applied only to your wireless connections. QOS between the router and your wireless PC will only serve to prioritize traffic between the router and that PC and have no affect on your internet traffic. Assuming you are not running browsers, VOIP and other traffic from that PC while you're gaming, then that will not accomplish anything. i.e. You're giving your only traffic highest priority, but that traffic is not competing with anything (except other nearby wireless connections on the same channel).
On the traffic shaping screenshot, you have broadband ethernet checked, but according to your other thread, your WAN connection is Broadband Coax, not Broadband ethernet.

QOS for PCoIP on a 3850

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for