Qty... weekly buckets wise

Hi Experts,
I am creating a report on top of the infocube.
I have 3 quantities in the cube and i have to show one quantity as per calweek and remaining 2 in single columns.
I kept the calweek in column and first quantity under that and i am not able keep remaining 2 in rows.
To achieve this i have created to char info objects and assigned to remaining quantities by rounding the decimals.
now the problem is i am getting more than one line per item due to this new char objects.
my requirement is to show one line per item.
Please suggest me to fulfill my user requirement.
Thank you
Manju

Thanks, I did look up the note 737230 yesterday and realized that it was standard functionality by SAP, I had a feeling that was the case anyway.  The problem is that the user is running a report out of APO to make sure that there are no data inconsistencies with the original data in the external database where we import from.  So they look at the database data, and it is in correct format, then they look at APO at the storage bucket profile level and those weeks are seperated so it makes it difficult.  I realize they should look at it at the time bucket profile, but now this brings up concerns from them. 
How can they view the data in a non planning book view where the weeks are not split to make sure the data came over correctly? 
Also, when I extract this data back to an outside database, will the data still be in those seperated buckets, or will it consolidate?  I guess I can test this myself by extracting to a text file and just viewing that file.
To keep everything in synch, is my only option to create a fiscal year variant to correspond with the true weeks?  I feel as if this would be overkill for functionality many people would want?

Similar Messages

  • Fixed Days Supply - Weekly Buckets

    In 12.06 for Unconstrained Planning we are using the Order Modifier "Fixed Days Supply" .Also when using Fixed Days Supply Modifier we are not using any other order modifiers.
    The issue is Planning process does not consider the Fixed Days Supply value for weekly buckets.
    If the Fixed Days Supply value is 5 days for Item at Org the planned orders are are created in weekly buckets for every 2 weeks.
    For the Days bucket the Fixed days supply order modifier works ok.
    Tried changing the profile option : MSC: Apply Lot Modifiers in Weekly/Period Buckets to YES without any .
    Any idea why the planning engine is doing this?

    When you use aggrregated time buckets (weekly in this case) plannign engine shifts the due dates of the demand falling in a particular bucket to the end date of that bucket. (for eg...demand of 100 nos of a finished good on day 2 of 2nd week will be shifted to last day of week 2nd week). So leadtime offsetting starts from the end date of the bucket and not from the actual demand date. This can result in shifting of planned order supply to a date that is beyond the timespan governed by "fixed days supply". (5 days in this case).Being so this supply will not be used while deciding planned order qty.
    This is one possible reason.....pls check this out.
    Regards,
    Utkarsh

  • Display missing weeks bucket to 0 in a horizon of 20 weeks

    Hi,
    Could you please let me know if there are any options for displaying the missing week bucket's key-figure as '0' in the output.
    Few weeks are not available from source.
    Thanks
    Sani

     This should work:
    Get-LastLogon -Computername (Get-content .\Servers.txt) | Export-CSV .\Output.csv -NoTypeInformation
    I just tested it on my test domain and it did the trick.

  • Forecast Transfer to R/3 in Daily/Weekly buckets

    Hi,
    We have 2 planning areas in DP - Weekly and daily planning area. For the first 3 weeks, the forecast will be transferred to R/3 in daily buckets and for the remaining 2 weeks, the forecast will be transferred in weekly buckets. I have created 2 separate transfer profiles - one for daily transfer from the daily planning book and another one for weekly transfer from weekly planning book. When I run the forecast transfer from the daily planning book for the first 3 weeks, the forecast gets successfully transferred to R/3 Demand management. But, when I run the forecast transfer from the weekly planning book for Weeks 4 & 5, the forecast gets released successfully although it overwrites the previous forecast in daily buckets. Please bear in mind that the time periods for daily and weekly transfer are different. The same thing happens if I run the weekly transfer first and then do the daily transfer. For another location, we release the forecast to SNP in the same way and it works fine. Does anyone has any clues about this situation? Thanks.

    Hello,
    The following are the planning book/data views that I am using to transfer forecast
    Planning book2: Background Daily Planning book
    Dataview2: Daily Forecast Transfer View
    Time bucket profile: 21 days
    Transfer profile: Daily Transfer profile (Released to active version A)
    Activity: Daily Transfer Activity
    Job: Daily Transfer Job (based on planing book2 and data view2)
    Planning book1: Background Weekly Planning book
    Dataview1: Weekly Forecast Transfer View (Offset field is set to 3 so that forecast could be transferred to weeks 4 & 5.
    Time bucket profile: 2Weeks
    Transfer profile: Weekly Transfer profile (Released to active version A)
    Activity: Weekly Transfer Activity
    Job:Weekly Transfer Job ( based on planing book1 and data view1)
    Yes, I am transferring both the daily and weekly forecast to the same active version, but different time horizons. So, in order to do this, do I need to transfer to 2 different active versions. If this is the case, can DRP be able to use forecast from 2 active versions?

  • APO Demand Planning in Weekly bucket with customized definition

    Hi
    I would be performing Demand Planning on a weekly bucket. Week starts from Saturday and Ends on Friday. The Planning will be performed for the six future month.
    Can anyone suggest, how it can be done and If Fiscal Year Variant has to be used, then what will be the definition of the variant.
    The financial year is from 1st jan to 31st Dec
    Looking forward to a solution.
    Regards,
    Anoop
    Edited by: Anoop Sahu on Mar 29, 2009 5:14 PM

    You can define a fiscal year variant with 52 weeks and specify the last day as a friday in every period...
    To carry out planning for 6 future months only..you may define a Time bucket profile for 6 months and use this in the dataview definition.Use the above fiscal year variant in this Time bucket profile

  • CLOSED: Resource requirements logic in weekly buckets

    I have a problem with identifying resource requirements in separate weekly buckets.
    Let's consider just one resource, here is an example from live application:
    Bucket A: 30-07-2006 00:00:00 - 06-08-2006 23:59:59
    Bucket B: 07-08-2006 00:00:00 - 13-08-2006 23:59:59
    Resource availability (actual, not bucketed):
    06.08.2006 22:00-00:00 (2h)
    07.08.2006 00:00-00:00 (24h)
    ... (24h)
    Resource requirement from ASCP:
    Start Date: 06-08-2006 13:30:00
    End Date: 07-08-2006 10:41:00
    Resource hours: 15
    Resource units: 1 unit
    Question is how many of resource requirement hours fall in the bucket A, and how many in bucket B?
    Customer needs to check resource requirement hours in each bucket for reporting purposes.
    What is the logic behind? How to identify exact resource hours used in each bucket for resource requirements falling in two adjoining weekly buckets?
    Thanks in advance for your help
    Catalina
    Message was edited by:
    user447176

    Have a look to package MSC_CRP_HORIZONTAL_PLAN : this package computes data for resource horizontal plan. It will help you to understand how available and required capacity are computed.
    We currently use this package (procedures MSC_CRP_HORIZONTAL_PLAN.query_list and MSC_CRP_HORIZONTAL_PLAN.populate_horizontal_plan) to compute data for our reports. It gives the results displayed into the workbench.

  • Split SNP planned order to weekly buckets

    Hi all,
    does anyone knows a way to split SNP planned order to weekly buckets from monthly buckets?
    the planner enters his production forecast in SNP94 in monthly buckets, but for purchasing prefer to see the demand weekly, i need an automatic split of planned order (something like the split of forecast).

    to split the component will not help, the need is to distribute the finish goods through the month on weekly buckets, once the finish goods are on weekly bucket, i don't care if the all the components demand is at the beginning of the period.
    i need a macro or heuristic to split the quantity, see the example below, the planner has monthly view in which he had entered 55,000 PC for month 10.2014, before i transfer this quantity to the ECC i need to split it to weekly buckets:
    simple MRP run will not work, because the planner may plan to produce more than the total demand.

  • Sale Qty Material grp wise

    DearAll ,
    whr we can find total  sale Qty material grp Wise Per Month ?
    Pl guide with report
    regards

    Hi,
    Using std analysis you may find LIS reports material wise.
    For material grp wise create a std/flexible report as per your requirement.
    [LIS|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/LOLIS/LOLIS.pdf]
    [LIS Components|http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/LOLIS/LOLIS_KOMPONENTEN%20DES%20LIS.pdf]
    Regards,
    Amit
    Edited by: Amit Iyer on Aug 28, 2009 12:14 AM

  • In Production Return & Rejected Qty Prod Order wise required

    Hi Experts,
    In Production, Parent Item to be produced 100. Two Child items are there for the parent Item.
    Parent Item A- 100 Qty
    Child Item A1- 100 Qty -- Issue method Back flush
    Child ItemA2 -100 Qty -- issue method Manual
    Child Item A2 Issued Manually. Production Completed........
    In the receipt from Production
    Parent Item A -90 Qty completed
    Child Item A1- 8 Qty Returned (Good Raw Material Returned)
    Child Item A2- 3 Qty Returned (Good Raw Material Returned)
    Child Item A1 -2 Qty rejected (To be scraped)
    Child Item A2 - 7 Qty rejected (To be scraped)
    We would like to take query/Report......... Production Order Wise, Child Item Issued, Component Returned, Component Rejected.
    Plz Guide Me,
    Thanks and Regards,
    Manikandan

    Hi,
    In SAP, for items defined as Back-flush, you cannot change the issue qty of Raw Material components. This will always correspond exactly to the qty of Finished Goods and the relation between the FG qty and the component qty in BOM. In you example, the RM Item A will be issued as 100 qty as the FG produced is 100 qty.
    Or if you are recording 90 qty then RM Item A will be consumed automatically equal to 90 qty.
    In SAP, the FG reject is prodcued only for numerical record and is recorded in the Receipt from Production screen. Total prodcued qty will be reject qty + completed qty.
    The scrap of FG item is not possible as FG item. Fixed qty of Scrap can be defined in the BOM or the production order as a row with negative qty. This will be prodcued automatically based on the qty relationship between Scrap item and the FG item.
    Say if in the Production Order for a FG of 100 qty, scrap is produced equal to 20 qty, then this srap item will be entered in the Production Order as a row of -20 qty. When production of X qty is recorded, scrap will be prodcued in the following ratio:
    Scrap produced = X * (20/100)
    Regards

  • Weekly Bucket question

    Good morning,
    I have an MRP lot size that is a weekly period.
    It is set to start at the begining of the period.
    I would expect this to be a Monday but it is raising the Procurement Proposals on a Tuesday, what needs to be maintained to work on a Monday.
    Thanks
    Guy.

    Hi Guy,
    I'm not sure whether Planning timefence has any connection with lotsizing.
    Planning time fence when used with corresponding MRP type ( like MRP with firming type 1..1..etc) will ensure that the system diesn't change/create any receipt elements for any unfullfilled demand in the planning timefence.
    Alternatively it creates planned orders outside the planning timefence and firms it ( depends on the MRP type) with correcponding exception messages.
    The planner has to manually reschedule it ( if required).
    Lot sizing is used to accumulate the requirements for creating the proposals.
    Could you please explain your query with a business need/example.
    Thanks & regards
    Mahesh
    Please follow the link  - For Firming type Help.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/f4/7d30a944af11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    Reward points if useful.
    Edited by: Mahesh Babu MG on Jan 25, 2008 4:25 PM

  • ASCP Planned orders in period buckets (Weekly or Monthly)

    Hi,
    We see that the ASCP planned order due dates are pushed to friday of week (if in weekly buckets) or last friday of the month (if in Monthly buckets).
    What is causing this behaviour? Is there any profile option/plan option cuasing this to happen.
    Any help in regard is most appreciated.
    Regards,
    Anand

    Hi Guru,
    1) Please check the maximum earliness & lateness of a receipt under Pegging in Demand tab of APO material master is defined.
    2) In SNP2 tab, check the period split whether the data is blank.  If it is 2, the planning data will get disagregated and released from middle of bucket.
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Disaggregation of Key figure not in proportion at monthly bucket

    Dear Expert,
    Please find the below case.
    Here Key figure 2 is disaggregated based on Key figure 1 (Calculation Type P) also we maintained Time based disaggregation K.
    The issue is - if you check total, it is 13 for both key figures as shown in below screen shot.
    But region wise (Detail level) if you checked, it is not in 1:1 proportion and it is causing problem for us.
    For example Region 2 having value in KF1 as 2 for Week 11.2015 but after disaggregation it got nothing on KF2.
    (The reason is Key figure 2 is having value in week 12 and week 13 and nothing in Week 11)
    We tried 2 different approach to get 1:1 proportion in Monthly bucket, but it could solve our problem.
    Approach 1-After  Key figure2 calculated in Weekly bucket, Reset Key figure 2 at total level in Monthly data View and enter the Total of Key figure 2 at Total level in Monthly bucket.Check the result at detailed level.
    But in this case it is calculated for week 10, 11, 12 and 13 as 0,  9, 3, 1. (We want Key figure2 as per original calculation i.e it should be 12 and 1 in week 12 and 13 respectively)
    Approach2 -
    Approach 2 - Add another New Key figure as Key figure 1 Total- which sum the Key figure1  at detailed unit at Month level and then disaggregation of Key figure2  based on this new KF.
    Its working for this scenario but different scenario is not working.
    For example- here region 3 and 4 affected.
    If disaggregation at Month level is corrected, our issue will be resolve.
    Waiting for your feed back.
    Thank you
    Sachin

    Hi,
    In Planning Area u2013 Key Figure settings,  did you try to use  u2018N - No disaggregation in timeu2019  for KF2  key figure ?
    This will mean that copying will occur in technical periods of the storage bucket profile and not the way it happens now.
    Other  option:
    Now, you storage bucket profile and also the planning bucket proifile  are  in Days/Weeks/   .Months 
    Is it necessary for your user to view data in daily buckets ?  Can the user view  the data in weekly buckets only (and not in daily buckets) ?
    Your planning bucket profile can be in Weeks/..Months .
    This way your displayed data will be in weekly buckets.
    Regards
    Datta

  • MRP, need to split total order in three week

    Hi SAP GURU,
    i need to split total order in three weeks. how i can make setting so that after MRP execution system will create proposals like 1st week302nd week 303rd week 40
    Thanks,
    SAP PQ

    Dear
    Goto MD61-Enter Material -Goto User Parameters -Select Weekly (W) -Enter Weekly bucket qty in case u have PIR as your demand
    In case if you have Sales Order oriented qty then you can use Scheduling agreement kind of forecasting in VA31  instea of MD61  or Yo can try Period Lot Size WB in Material master and logging Sales Order qty .
    Check both cases in sandbox and look at MD04 result
    regards
    JH

  • Forecast Consumption in SNP for shipped qty's

    Hello experts,
    I got a question for forecast consumption in SNP and whether forecast stays "consumed" or not after a customer orders gets shipped (Post Goods Issue).
    My example is: I have a weekly bucket forecast qty of 100 in DP and release this to SNP. Now in SNP planning book I have 30 units of open Customer Demand against it ... means I have 70 in Forecast line (30 units got consumed correctly). Once I create a shipment for the open Customer Order of 30 units in R3 the situations remains the same .. but if I post the Goods Issue now on the delivery document the Customer Demand disappears (which is correct) but my Forecast line increases again from 70 to 100. I thought forecast consumption in APO would "remember" the already shipped quantities ? I know that you can reorganize open forecast but want I'm looking for is the standard R3 behaviour of keeping already shipped qty's as consumed. Can anybody help here or explain ?
    Regards
    Thomas
    Using SCM5.0

    Hi Datta,
    I checked the note  - there is only point 9 in the list saying:
    "9. During goods issue for the delivery in R/3, the forecast is always reduced to the date requested by the customer. In addition, overdeliveries are ignored."
    Unfortunately this doesn't explain how it works or needs to be done to have FCST consumption happen in APO_SNP based on shipped qty's. In my case FCST consumption works okay up to the point of posting the goods issue on a delivery document. I wonder if there something I need to activate somewhere to have this working since I can't see any "with drawn qty" in APO.
    Any other hints ?
    Regards
    Thomas

  • Key figure display in planning book with respect to Time bucket profile

    Hi,
    I am loading a key figure to planning area from the info cube for the current month. When I review the key figure in planning book with monthly time bucket profile it shows 85 for the current month. In the same planning book with weekly bucket profile, it shows 55 from the current week and future weeks and the remaining 30 goes into the past weeks of the current month.
    How to make the total quantity 85 to show in the current and future weeks only.
    thanks and regards
    Murugesan

    Hi Murugesan,
    Within the Planning Area, the data is stored at the lowest level granularity that you maintain in storage bucket profile. Then during display, system will decide what data to show depending on what kind of time bucket profile you use in the planning view, and the time based disaggregation that you maintain for Key Figure.
    In this below case, what time characteristic do you have in cube? Is it date, week or month?
    If it's date, check how much KF data is maintained on the dates which belong to week which has days both in this month/last month e.g. if I talk about Dec 2011, how much data is stored 1,2,3 & 4 th of Dec, 2011.
    This data would appear in Dec in monthly view, but in week, it would appear in the week starting 28th November.
    If data is maintained in cube in weeks, then you need to calculate how time based disaggregation would show it to you in months.
    If it's months, then you would need to find out how much data would go to the days in the past week of the month.
    The time based disaggregation may be causing you some issues, but in that case, I would not expect 30 out of 85 to go in the past week, unless you have data in cube in days.
    Data shown in weekly view for week starting 28th Nov should ideally be a small proportion of 85, unless you are using a time stream/fiscal year variant, due to which most of December is in holidays.  The only other exception I can think of is that you have data in teh days mentioned above.
    It would be best to help the business understand this disaggregation logic, rather than thinking of manipulating the data to shift to a later week.
    If this logic doesn't explain your situation, then please provide the date/week/month at which you have data in cube, and what quantity.
    Thanks - Pawan

Maybe you are looking for