Quality in production and delivery

Hello,.
I am new to QM.I need to know quality process in production and delivery.
can you please provide good process document?
1.Process documentation.
2.Cusrtomization.
Thanks and regards,
Shyam

Hi
Shyamkiran
There are various documents available;
QM in Prod:
http://www.sap-img.com/qm010.htm
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/print46c/en/data/pdf/QMPR
QM inSD:
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/EN/data/pdf/QMSD
Regards
Sujit

Similar Messages

HP's Low Quality Product and Customer Service

On 1/23/15 I ordered a brand new Envy Phoenix 810 with modifications. First the website was broken and I ended up having to call to get the order placed. The computer arrived on 1/30/15 via FedEx, since paid for 2 day delivery.
The computer ran for 7 days and on 2/6/15 it froze in Win 8.1 and after reboot all I could get from it was a couple of clicks and fans spinning on high.
I called tech support, and the gentleman there very quick realized, as I had, this computer needed replacing. I made it clear I didn't want a 7 day old computer repaired, I wanted a NEW computer. He then sent me to some management group who told me, since their hardware managers don't work on weekends, the fastest way to get a new computer was for him to transfer me to the sales people. Back and forth with the sales people who told me I couldn't get a new computer until I sent the old one back. They sent me to customer support, who then put in an escalation to a manager, who wasn't working the weekend either, and who would call me back within 2 days.
A good 1.5 hours on the phone, and not once did I speak to someone whose first language was English.
I spent the weekend fuming to be honest, and now let's fast forward to Monday 2/9/15.
I waited for the call from the manager, and nothing. I finally gave up and placed another call to customer service. I was immediately told that I had to go through technical support first if my computer wasn't working, never mind that I am sure there was information on my account that told them I'd already been through all that.
So we start all over. Oddly, the computer, having sat disconnected from power all weekend, now behaved differently. It actually let me get into the bios, where we started it running on hard drive diagnostics, which eventually just froze, at which point we were back to no post and loud fans.
At this point the cycle started again, and I was sent to a manager who told me they can't send me a computer, I'd have to send the old one back. I explain again, I have no boxes to send the old one back until I get the new one etc..
At some point (this is about 2.5 hours into the calls for the day) I end up with sales again and behold there is an intelligent person who realizes I have a preferred account and they can just charge me for a new computer and credit me for the old when I call back, get an RMA and send it back.
Of course the new computer suddenly costs more, and in all this not once was I offered recompense for my "pain and suffering".
After everything, the promised call from a manager (remember Friday?) finally came on Tuesday afternoon. He had apparently never read the transcripts from Friday OR Monday, and wanted to start all over again. I told him a computer had already been ordered, being charged to my preferred account and I'd call for an RMA after it arrived and send the offending piece of dead electronics back then for a credit to my account.
He assured me that an even trade could be done and that he was transferring me to sales.. again. He either didn't understand what I was telling him or didn't want to listen. The lady in sales was as puzzled as I as to the reason the call had been routed to sales, and explained that due to a new system they had recently started using, it wasn't possible any longer to send a new computer out without charging for it and then getting the credit for the RMA.
I must say, first the shotty product and then this insulting experience with all of the HP support facets, located in "Timbuktu" (I honestly don't know where they are, but they are not in the USA) means this will be my last product from HP. And believe me when I say, between my daughters and myself we will be spreading the word far and wide about what HP is all about these days.
HP, you used to be a good company, worthy of my hard earned money, you are not now.

Hi @KerstinHuhn ,
I have brought your issue to the attention of an appropriate team within HP. They will likely request information from you in order to look up your case details or product serial number. Please look for a private message from an identified HP contact. Additionally, keep in mind not to publically post ( serial numbers and case details).
If you are unfamiliar with how the Forum's private message capability works, you can learn about that here.
Regards,
George
I work for HP

Evaluation Comparision - Material wise Price,Quality and Delivery Scores

Hi All
I am new to QM and i am developing a custom report for vendor evaluation. For that report i need material wise scores of price,quality and delivery and based on this we need to perform some calculation.
In ME64 transaction i can able to see the General evaluation and Material wise evaluation for a pur.org,vendor and material combination.
From which table can i select this material wise scores.From table ELBP i can able to see only genral score and table ELBM has no entries.
Currently i can able to get the correct data by submitting ZRM06LBEW (Copy of ME64) in my report for pur.org,vendor and material combination.But i assume it may lead to performance issue.
So kindly suggest me any table,function module or BAPI to get the reuired data.
Thanks & Regards
P.Thangaraj

hii..
Explore Exit MM06L001.
Description for the same is for your reference which is copied as it is on the source:.
User Exits - Vendor Evaluation
Enhancement MM06L001 comprises four function exits, which are invoked during the calculation of the scores for the subcriteria. The enhancement makes it possible to replace the standard scoring method by customers' own methods.
Implementation Guide (IMG)
To allow a customer's own scoring methods to be used, an indicator must be set for the relevant subcriteria in the IMG in the step Define criteria.
Function modules
The function modules for enhancement MM06L001 are as follows:
    EXIT_SAPLMEL0_001
for the general criteria
    EXIT_RM06LBAT_001
for the quality criteria if the vendor evaluation is carried out in the background
    EXIT_SAPMM06L_001
for the quality criteria if the vendor evaluation is carried out online
    EXIT_RM06LBEW_001
for the quality criteria when the scores for the semi-automatic and automatic subcriteria are determined
The following data is passed on to the function modules:
    XLIFNR (Vendor number)
    XEKORG (Purchasing organization)
    XHKRIT (Main criterion)
    XTKRIT (Subcriterion)
    XKRTYP (Scoring method)
The function modules then supply the scores in the parameter XBEURT.
Coding example
The following example shows how a customer's own scoring method can be stored for the subcriterion "On-time delivery performance". The following coding can be added to program ZXM6LU01 for this purpose:
CASE XKRTYP.
WHEN '3'. "Ermittlungsmethode f・ die Termintreue"
(Scoring method for on-time delivery performance)
XBEURT = 50. "kundeneigene Logik"
(Customer's own logic)
ENDCASE.
In this case, 50 points are always awarded for a vendor's on-time delivery performance.
Function/Program:
    EXIT_RM06LBAT_001: User Exits for Vendor Evaluation
    EXIT_RM06LBEW_001: User Exits for Vendor Evaluation
    EXIT_SAPLMEL0_001: User Exits for Vendor Evaluation
    EXIT_SAPMM06L_001: User Exits for Vendor Evaluation
Regards,
Amol

Quality Check before every Delivery

Dear All,
I have a requirement as follows:
This is a Make to Stock scenario where the material is produced, a Quality check is performed and placed in finished goods storage location. After 3-4months of production when a Sales order is due for delivery, the client wants to perform a Quality check before every delivery is dispatched.
Can you please suggest me how this can be mapped in SAP?

Hello ,
please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/7b/acae87475331479287bcb94b25072d/frameset.htm
venkataswamy

Error while transporting the request from quality to production of BI

Dear all,
When transporting a request (which contains elements of correction - in Bex designer) from quality to production of BI the following error is displayed and the request transport fails. Can the experts throw some light on this.
           Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
           Transport request   : RBDK904992
           System              : RBP
           tp path             : tp
           Version and release: 372.04.04 700
           Post-import methods for change/transport request: RBDK904992
           Post-import method RS_AFTER_IMPORT started for ELEM L, date and time: 20080406140407
           Start of the after-import method RS_ELEM_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) ELEM (Activation Mode)
           Error when activating element EY2CXLKXP5X5AY0RQ2XKN9EX8
           Element 5E4II2344I3JG4R6ACMYQ441Z is missing in version M
           Start of the after-import method RS_ELEM_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) ELEM (Delete Mode)
           Errors occurred during post-handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for ELEM L
           The errors affect the following components:
             BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
           Post-import methods of change/transport request RBDK904992 completed
               Start of subsequent processing ... 20080406140407
               End of subsequent processing... 20080406140408
           Execute reports for change/transport request: RBDK904992
           Reports for change/transport request RBDK904992 have been executed
               Start of................ 20080406140408
               End of.................. 20080406140408
           Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
           End date and time : 20080406140408
           Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
M.M

Hi,
First try to figure out the object type from the text obtained by following steps above.
Goto Development server ,create fresh request (using transport connection) , transport to QA and then in to production.
After successful transfer of the request for this object ,try to reimport the request which caused error and it should go smoothly without any error.
Hope it helps.
Regards
Mr Kapadia

My experience in Toshibas product and customer services

Just a warning to people who may be considering purchasing a Qosmio based on my own experiences and the research I have done in the last week.
Toshibas customer service is simply not what it once was and there are 100s of reports of Qosmios of all generations suffering extreme issues just outside of warranty periods.
Ref: Toshiba Qosmio X500-149, Support call reference ********
I am writing to express my frustration, anger and disappointment in Toshibas product and customer services.
I am a Freelance Community Manager, Video Game and hardware reviewer in the video games industry presently looking after 2 communities for 2 employers totalling over 2.5m users, I travel to a lot of trade shows, expos and community meet and greets where I require a laptop suitable of showing the employers products which are usually AAA video games or editing video on the fly for publication to social networking sites.
In January of 2011 my 4 year old Alienware hit that point where it really needed replaced, I opted for a Toshiba Qosmio over the Asus G73 as there was a 300 price difference for near identical spec.
I managed to source a X500-149 at PCWorld the companies flagship model here in the UK paying 1499 for it on January 26th 2011 reduced from 1799.
For the 1st 13 month this laptop performed admirably aside a design issue of the fan guards that I raised on the 16th May 2011 with PCWorld where the heat expelled causes the rear guard plastics to become exceptionally brittle and crack. I evangelised the product to anyone who asked me what laptop and model it was that was running these AAA games in such great detail, something I certainly won't be doing in future.
In early March 2012 it then began randomly locking up requiring a hard reboot this would then suffer issues restarting, reporting Operating system could not be found this would usually point to a fault on the primary HD, disk checking software however reported no errors but this continued to happen which would lead me to suspect the motherboard.
Within a month of this problem starting the left laptop fan began making a horrible screeching noise and had a distinct wobble whenever high RPM's were required and the machine began to often go into thermal shut-down whilst performing my work duties and utilising graphics and higher than idle CPU.
I decided on the 23rd April 2012 that enough was enough and I was going to speak to Toshiba as for this to happen to a flagship laptop that was only just out of warranty was simply unacceptable.
23rd April called to report the issue and was basically told tough luck its out of warranty at this point I also updated my tel numbers with Toshiba as the info was outdated, after expressing my anger at this Toshiba agreed to offer me a extended warranty at a cost of 166.
I was fuming to say the least Toshibas flagship laptop breaks at 14 month old and I am expected to stump up more money. If I was not desperate as the machine is critical to my work I would have returned the machine to PCWorld under the sales of goods act and it not being fit for purpose.
As that course of action would likely lead to legal proceedings, engineer reports and even more delay than just dealing with Toshiba for a repair, against my better judgement I called back at 11am on 24th April paid the 166 and took Toshiba up on the warranty extension, order number ********** again having to provide correct tel numbers as where once again incorrect, immediately after I reported the faults.
Toshiba Support centre on fault reporting where great noting each issue in detail and raised a collection with UPS for the following day.
The evening of the 24th April whilst I was retrieving data from the laptop in preparation for factory resetting it the machine went into thermal shut-down with a very distinct smell of burning chemical/plastic coming from the rear vents.
It took me over 90 minutes to get the machine cool enough to actually reboot and get my data after this I shut it back down and boxed it up not be used again.
I thought the best course of action would be to report this as it was a fair step up from the previous overheating. Wednesday 25th April at around 9am I called Toshiba to report this and was advised this would have to be dealt with by a head office case manager, as the item had become hazardous thus the collection that would take the laptop to the service centre was cancelled.
At this stage the advisor took my contact numbers again and escalated the case to head office advising at that time that I would be called by HO within 24 hrs.
Thursday 26th April 15:31 Well past the 24 hr mark and no sign of a call so I called support again and spoke to a advisor called Jacob. Jacob advise that HO had indeed tried calling on 01670 ******* this number was my old number, this number was the number I had advised twice already was incorrect and had provided both a correct land-line and mobile number 3 times previously. To say I was annoyed was a understatement.
Jacob attempted to contact Chloe Sontag who was looking after my case but the line just rang out so Jacob advised that he had sent an email asking for Chloe to contact myself.
Friday came and still no contact by 15:00 so I called support who once again tried to patch me to Chloe who's number once again just rang out and again an email was sent asking to call me.
No call by 17:30 so I called tech support again and spoke to Ian asking for head offices number so I could call them direct, Ian provided the number yet advised that HO are now closed.
After expressing my frustration with this whole process and just how critical this machine is to my daily working life Ian promised to look into the case on Monday AM and try and expedite actually getting a phone call to at least start the process of having this laptop repaired.
To say I'm annoyed is really a understatement not only has this failure to receive a simple phone call at least delayed the repair by almost a week but it is costing me more and money daily when I spent a large amount on what I imagined would be a great laptop for 3-4 years and believed Toshiba actually had good customer service in the event something did happen.
My best guess is that Chloe is on holiday or is part time or such like as her phone just rings out and if that is the case then I would question why assign a case to her, if she isn't then I would want to know why after 2 additional mails advising that the customer is not happy and to contact them has there been no contact or are your case workers just so overworked with faulty products that they can't manage the workload ??
So far Toshibas inability to produce a product that last as long as you expect it would has cost me 2 days off work that I am having to make up this weekend thus cancelling prior commitments, 166 extended warranty 600 for a HP laptop that I had to go and purchase yesterday 27th April 2012 to actually perform my work on and who knows how much in phone calls by the time this matter will finally be resolved.
I was happy with Toshiba as a manufacturer and of course laptops can have issues however having now researched these issues far to many Qosmio X500 users report severe overheating just after the 12 month period or within it and many state that repair after repair has taken place but still to no avail, this on top of the cracking of the rear heat-sink guards has to be a design fault.
This letter will not arrive with you before I have hopefully had a phone call and my laptop has at least been collected for repair, If I have not had that phone call then I would expect another letter very shortly.
Why have I wrote this letter ? To express my disappointment with just how poor the durability of your flagship laptop is and also at just how poor your customer service are, 1500 is a lot of money in the PC purchasing scheme of things and to expect this quality of hardware and customer service is simply unacceptable.
I expect the repair to be expedited and if like some of the horror storys I have read online parts required will take 4 weeks + then I would expect a replacement laptop, not everyone uses these things for entertainment and whilst the HP I had to rush out and buy with money I didn't really have available can allow me to perform my core duties to the minimum it cannot allow me to perform my duties to my standards, my employers standards or my expectant communities standards.
This has been a really unfortunate series of events as I had been considering the X870 Ivy Bridge based on the Nvidia 670m Qosmio which would release soon and passing this X500 onto my partner but after these events and the fact that the HP laptop had to come out of the money saved for it then I can categorically state that will not be the case and I will instead opt for the Asus G55 or G75.
If this issue cannot be resolved to a satisfactory manner then I will have no option but to seek an independent engineers report as well as printing the myriad of similar reports of these issues on the internet and return the item to PCWorld.
In line with the sale of goods act 1979 a large electrical item has to be of satisfactory quality and fit for purpose for a period of 6 years whilst I wouldn't expect the full 6 years from a laptop I would expect at least 3-4 year especially considering that this is a near 2000 flagship model not a 200 budget model.
This is a action I really do not want to take as it will likely end in small claims court against PCWorld a company that on this occasion has done nothing wrong, I do not believe in punishing those who are not at fault so its a action I really wouldn't be happy with and I'm sure PCWorld one of if not the largest vendor of Toshiba products when you incorporate the rest of the DSG group wouldn't be too pleased with it either.
Frustratingly

So I received my laptop back today after having fans replaced and a good clean as well as the top cover replaced.
Opened the box and took the laptop out 1st thing I noticed was a screw rattling around inside, SIGH!!!!
Plugged the laptop in and attempted to boot it at this point it just cycle through finalisation of windows install and shutdown.
How could a laptop have been tested if it didn't even have windows installed ?
An hour later and I gave up unplugged it and lo and behold it actually booted when on battery only.
I then noticed that the SSD was full, oh wait no it wasn't the head office engineer in his infinite wisdom decided that partitioning a 64GB SSD to 2 drives barely even leaving enough for Windows on the C: and wait for it putting the HDD recovery on the second partition was a good course of action.
So a completely borked install and a screw floating around inside remind me how this particular engineer has a job ??
I spent the next 15 minutes just moving data around and creating and deleting partiitions to fix this mess up.
Grabbed HWMonitor to check temps and at an idle 50c on CPU and 36c on GPU they didn't look too bad,
Installed the Toshiba recommended Nvidia driver a driver I hasten to add that was released in 2010 as Toshiba have not updated the drivers for their flagship series laptop since then, They are happy to take your 1643 that the unit cost but then don't expect support for it.
Anyway that aside I then installed 1 of the games I work on and began to run the machine through our benchmark software wooooosh the temps shot up to 90c+ on both CPU and GPU and remained at this temp for the duration of the benchmark never quite triggering thermal shutdown, I then loaded into a warzone for further testing and sure enough half way through it the machine shut down due to thermal shutdown.
I then uninstalled the toshiba driver and tried a NVidia one sure enough as others have advised actual Nvidia drivers seem worse and thermal shutdown came so much earlier.
I have been to PCWorld today to begin proceedings of returning outside of warranty due to not being fit for purpose or of suitable quality. This is costing me a further 60 and at least 2 weeks more without a proper machine and will likely result in me getting about 1300 back from PCWorld.
So lets do the math on just what this will have cost me by the time its finished.
1634 Original purchase
166 Extended Warranty
600 Backup Laptop whilst this was away for a month
60 outside of warranty assessment
50 phone calls
I will probably receive 1300 back but then 1300 doenst buy me the spec I need for work so I will have to pull out another 300-400 for the required spec so lets add that to the original figures.
A Toshiba Qosmio, Toshibas flagship laptop will have cost me in total 2910 almost double its actual retail price.
I will NEVER buy a Toshiba product again and it will become my lifes mission to let everyone know just how terrible they are.

STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of background

Hi experts,
In return document (with reference to Work Order), When user is selecting recommended action u2018YAu2019 and clicking the u2018returnu2019 button, an STO and delivery is getting created in the foreground instead of generating them in background.
T-code - o3o_RT02
Test case
Create Work Order (IW31)
Create return document w.r.t Work Order (o3o_RT01)
Select recommended action u2018YAu2019, save and select u2018returnu2019 button.

Hi,
Could you checkthe foll cust link in SPRO:
Define Objects in Backend System (Purch. Reqs, Reservations, Purch. Orders).
PO is created if you set the "*" for EITHER the purchasing group OR the product category.
SRM is creating PR or PO depending on:
- SRM customizing (ex: always external proc + PR if incomplete, PO if complete)
- the interpretation of SC data by R/3.
IF your SC is considered complete by SRM (but with a fixed vendor and not a preferred vendor) the system will check if it can create a PO in R/3.
For this, each item will request a META_INTERPRETE_DATA to R/3, asking if it can create a PO. If R/3 considers this data as incomplete, it will reply to create a PR.
Usual cases of R/3 PR creation instead of PO:
- prefered vendor in SRM (and not a fixed one)
- custom checks in user exits in R/3
- error messages in R/3 (ex: O6 334 In the case of a fixed vendor, please enter info record)
To debug without debuging into R/3, you can also try the following:
- use BADI DETERMINE_TARGET_OBJECT and force PO creation
- so the system will always try to create a PO
- R/3 won't create the PO (for the same reason as in META_INTERPRETE_DATA), and will raise an error in SRM
- finally you get the real error in application monitor (SC --> backend application errors
Related thread:
Re: PO not create from SC with source of supply in classic sena
BR,
Disha.
<b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

Error while uploading roles from quality to production

Dear friends,
I have to upload roles from quality to production.
I have downloaded it from qualtiy but while uploading to production it is giving me an error "File does not contain valid data".
Can anybody tell me what could be the problem and how to resolve it.
Thanks in advance
regards
Nirgun

HI matore,
the best way is to transport the roles from DEV to QA and then to production as julius suggested
are you trying for mass down load are single role
Mass download
go to PFCG >> utilities>> Mass download>> select all the roles which you want to move it to production
and execute save it on desktop
now go to production system>> go to PFCG>>in menu click on roles>>click on upload>>select the file which is saved in desktop and click ok
mass generation of roles
in the menu click on utilities>>mass generation>>give the role names with you have uploaded and click on execute select all click on genetate button
download a single role
go to PFCG>>in the menu click on role>>click on down load and save it on desktop
now go to production system>> go to PFCG>>in menu click on roles>>click on upload>>select the file and click ok
now you needs to manully generate the role
do the user comparison
hope this helps
thanks
kishore

Reg: Error while transporting from Quality to Production

Hi ,
I am facing a problem while transporting ODS from quality to production.. The same works perfectly when i transport from Dev to quality.
The Error Displayed while transporting is
Start of the after-import method RS_ODSO_AFTER_IMPORT for object type
The creation of the export DataSource failed
Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts
Error when creating the export DataSource and dependent Objects
Error when activating DataStore Object
The creation of the export DataSource failed
Password logon no longer possible - too many failed attempts
Error when creating the export DataSource and dependent Objects
Error when resetting DataStore Object to the active version
Kindly give me some suggestion ..
Thanks in advance
Regards
Guru

go to the source system RFC connection in SM59 and do a remote login - if you get the login page there then there is an issue with the RFC connection. also check if any other system is using the same RFC.. we had a situation where th R/3 connection was being used by 3 BI instances and everytime we reset the password , another system would lock the sme , ultimately we identified the systems and did a password reset in all the systems and then the issue got resolved.
but then we also faced the same issue you faced and it was related to login issues - check the remote login and that will tell you.

How i can transport request created in R3AR2 from Quality to Production ?

Hi, Gurus !
I'm new in CRM 7.0, and need your help. Well, we made our implementation in 7.0 version, and the things will be fine, until the start of work.....
Well, the initial download of CUSTOMER_MAIN (in transaction R3AR2) do'n't run OK, because a lot of customers in selection have a bad data.... and this time, anybody change this data,
Today, i know how to re-made this task.....
But my question is : how can transport this request, created in R3AR2, from Quality to Production ?
If the transport is not possible, the answer for the question is remake the request in Production ?
Thank you very much.....
Loduca

Did you put your development in a transport when you first saved it? If yes, and if your transport system is properly configured you can release the transport using SE09 and import it into the production using transaction STMS.
Markus

Problem while loading data from quality to production

Hai,
We are using standard extractor 2LIS_11_VASCL, and in test case in QTY 300, we were able to make some changes and see the changes and see the results of the changes in T-CODE RSA3. When we try the same changes in PRD300, No Changes are triggered and T-CODE RSA3 shows no changes.
Can any one suggest me regarding this prolem...

Hi bandi,
Instead of trying for the same changes in production, why cant you do the transport the object from Quality to Production & then check for the changes in RSA3.
You are transporting the object only from Quality to production.
As no data is present in PRD, u may not be finding any changes in RSA3.
Hope it helps.

Process of moving TR from Quality to Production

Dear Experts,
we are in a process of moving TR from Quality to Production. While moving we faced transport incositencies like some old requests have been overwritten into the new one and dependant objects were failed during import in PRD. Now production rehearsal client is kind of messed up. what is the right procedure to transport the requests from Quality to Production. (actually we transferred the TR individually based on the list send by the respectivr module owners). Please help me to findout the solution for this issue.
regards,
Yasin.

Hi,
This situation comes every now & then when you don't have any client strategy define in your landscape I'm not blaming you but for your Project Manager and then rest of the team adopt SAP standard practice if you really want things to go well act NOW..!! here is the basic to start:
Ex,
DEV ::
100 => Golden Client
200 => Customizing Client
300 => Test Client
Things to check before importing request in QAS :
1) Always get the request in sequence format ask the owner of the request for the sequence to avoid dependency issues
2) Technical Specification doc - this doc will be prepare by Functional / Developer on what changes are included in TR
QAS::
400 => Quality Client
Things to check before importing request in PRD :
1) User acceptance doc i.e UAT - client / customer will check the functionality if it's on then move this to PRD
2) Get the request in sequence format
3) Approval for production transport
PRD::
500 => Production Client
Thanks,
Saleem

Transport of object from Quality to Production.

Hi,
I am a technical designer and have a limited understanding on the transport management system and basis.
I had recently created an object on the development system and provided my user with the transport request number. She had moved it to Quality and tested it. The object is working fine and she wants to move it to the production system.
I was under the impression that the request would show up on the production system and could be imported from quality but it is not.
Could some one explain as to what I am missing here? Is there anything I could do from my side to get the object moved from Quality to Production?
Regards,
Prem.

Hi Prem
Plz check whether your request is relased and transported
correctly.
for this log into quality system and type the tcode STMS_IMPORT.
search for your request,
if available ,check if there is a green tick mark against that, if yes then it can be imported to production system ( that has to be done by your BASIS personell).
if not,
check any filter criteria is set in the fields displayed and remove / change if required that as per requirement.
or , use the menu path GOTO -> IMPORT HISTORY (Ctrl+F7) and search ther (here also check for the filter criteria).
it should be available, if it is transported correctly.
do the same in your production system also, u can find your request (but unless transported to production there will not be the green tick mark against that)
reward if useful.
Regards
Prabumanoharan

Transport of activity from Quality to production for webDynpro Java applica

Hi,
can anybody tell me how do i go for transporting activity in webdynpro java applications from quality to production server.
i have done some changes in webdynpro code and deployed in quality system. i have created activity and now want to transport that to production so that the changed functionality should reflect in production system.
Its urgent so your quick suggestion will be appreciated.

Hi,
can anybody tell me how do i go for transporting activity in webdynpro java applications from quality to production server.
i have done some changes in webdynpro code and deployed in quality system. i have created activity and now want to transport that to production so that the changed functionality should reflect in production system.
Its urgent so your quick suggestion will be appreciated.
Hi Vijayalaxmi,
Following are the steps for transporting the content from DEV to QA
1. Check in the activity into DTR and activate it. Once it is activated successfully it will show green
2. Now go to transport view and release the activity by drilling down in waiting... node.
3. Once the activity is released it becomes available in the Consolidation tab of CMS.
4. Import the activity in consolidation tab
5. Assemble the components in the Assembly tab.
Once you assemble an .SCA file is created in \usr\<SID>\trans\CMS
6. Copy this file manually and deploy it using SDM in QA.
Hope it clears your doubts
Best Regards,
Ravi

Transport of Employees from Quality to Production

Hello,
This is regarding Employee assignment in CRM Sales Organizations (using T code PPOMA_CRM). We have around 1200 employees to be assigned in CRM Sales Organizations & we have to assign USER ID's for each of these employees.Since we do not have all 1200 employee master data in Development Server we will have to do this excercise in Quality Server. We want to save all these assignments in a Transport request directly from Quality server, so later same can be transported to Production Server .
Kindly let me know standard procedure for transporting all the assignments of employees & user ids from Quality to Production.
Regards,
Rajendra

Hi Rajendra,
Salesorganisation assignment to employee is masterdata and it willl not involve any tranport .
You need to create the assignment in production client. Sales organisation Id will change from client to
Client.
Regards
Pavan.A

Quality in production and delivery

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for