Query Based on DSO - Bad Performance

Hi,
I have few query's based on DSO 0FIGL_O14. The data size is too large in this nearly in crores. I have vendor credit report based on this. I run this query for a month and the performanceis too bad.. i get a time out error.
kindly suggest how can i improve my query performance which is based on DSO. I have checked the query read mode which is 'H'.
Thanks
Dipika

Hi,
If none of above (index/change in query) works, I would go ahead with multiprovider/logical partio...
hope below link is helpful to you.
Physical Vs Logical Partitioning
Regards,
Vinay
Edited by: Vinay Joshi on Mar 4, 2011 9:56 PM

Similar Messages

I am designing query based on dso

Hi,
         i am designing query based on dso. in my query production orders have multiple operations.when i execute my query report is showing only latest operations.we need to all operation.how can i fetch.
ex :   production order                  operation
           100000141                            10,20,30,40,50
when i exceute the query query is showing only 100000141 & 50.query is not showing 10,20,30,40 opeartions.please help me.
Thanks & Regards,
chandu.

Hi Chandu,
Check for the filters and variables for production order operation
in query designer.
Also check if that field is restriced to particular values, and check for any periodic restrictions.
Hope this helps...........
Rgs,
I.R.K

Bad Performance in a query into table BKPF

Hi forum i have a really problem in the second query under the table
BKPF.. some body cans help me, please
*THIS IS THE QUERY UNDER MSEG
SELECT tmsegmblnr tmkpfbudat tmsegbelnr tmsegbukrs tmseg~matnr
         tmsegebelp tmsegdmbtr tmsegwaers tmsegwerks tmseg~lgort
         tmsegmenge tmsegkostl
FROM mseg AS tmseg JOIN mkpf AS tmkpf ON tmsegmblnr = tmkpfmblnr
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_docs
WHERE
    tmseg~bukrs IN se_bukrs AND
    tmkpf~budat IN se_budat AND
    tmseg~mjahr = d_gjahr AND
    ( tmsegbwart IN se_bwart AND tmsegbwart IN (201,261) ).
IF sy-dbcnt > 0.
I CREATE AWKEY FOR CONSULTING BKPF
    LOOP AT it_docs.
      CONCATENATE it_docs-mblnr d_gjahr INTO it_docs-d_awkey.
      MODIFY it_docs.
    ENDLOOP.
THIS IS THE QUERY WITH BAD BAD PERFOMANCE
I NEED KNOW "BELNR" FOR GO TO THE BSEG TABLE
    SELECT belnr awkey
    FROM bkpf
    INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE it_tmp
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_docs
    WHERE
      bukrs = it_docs-bukrs AND
      awkey = it_docs-d_awkey AND
      gjahr = d_gjahr AND
      bstat = space .
THNKS

Hi Josue,
The bad performance is because you're not specifying the primary keys of the table BKPF in your WHERE condition; BKPF usually is a big table.
What you really need is to create a new index on database for table BKPF via the ABAP Dictionary on fields BUKRS, AWKEY, GJAHR & BSTAT. You'll find the performace of the program will significantly increase after the new index is activated. But I would talk to the Basis first to confirm they have no issues if you create a new index for BKPF on the database system.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Sougata.

Performance of my query based on cube ? and ods?

hi all,
how to identify the performance of my query based on a cube nor ods. I have requirement which enables to do flat file extraction and the extraction is only once and the records are less too. I need to sort whether my query will be faster based upon cube nor on ods.
Can anyone let me know how to measure the performance of my query based upon cube and ods and how to find out which one will be faster. bcos i need to explain them the entire process of going to load the data directly to ods and do reporting from there nor data loaded directly to cube and do reporting from cube.
thanxs
haritha

Hi,
ODS is 2 Dimensional so avoid reporting on ODS,
Cube is MultiDim, for analysis perpose we can go reporting on Cube only
Records in ODS are Overwritten whereas in Cube records are Aggregated
and can also do compression on Cube, which will increase the query performance and so data retrieval in cube is faster
Thanks

How to increase performanceof query based on Infoset?

How to increase the performance of a query based on a Infoset?
As per designing of query, all the necessary fields are placed where they are required.

Hi Akshara ,
To improve performanceof query try to remove unnecessary characteristics, attributes, or key figures ,Superfluous conditions or variables .Large InfoCubes and Complex hierarchies .Variables populated by user exits
For characteristics specify either variables or restrictions .
You can create indexes on DSO and Aggregates on cubes (if any).
Please go through the links :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/77/4a213cc534f20ae10000000a11402f/content.htm
Re: Performance of query built on infoset
Query performance issue - Infoset query
Hope you will find this helpful.
Regards,
Jaya

Query based on ODS showing connection time out

Hi,
I have a query based on an ODS. The selection criteria for the query is Country which is a navigational attribute of the ODS. When i exceute the query using a country with lesser volume of data the query runs fine. But when i choose a country that has more number of records the query shows 500 connection timeout error sometimes and sometimes it runs fine for the same country.
I tried to execute the report using country as input variable - First i executed the report using a country with lesser volume of data it worked fine as usual and then i added another country with larger volume of data in the filter criteria and the old problem cropped up.
Could you please suggest a solution?
Appreciate your response.
Thanks
Ashok

Hi,
Its not recommneded to have a query on DSO which gives huge amount of data as output.
For small amount it should not be a problem.
Shift your queries to a multicube as recommended by SAP and build the multicube over the cube which loads from the DSO.
SAP recommends to create queries only on multiproviders.
If not possible then you can try to create indexes on DSO on the characteristics field which are used in filter and global selections in the query.This can improve the query performace.
But this will create performance issue while loading data to the DSO.
So you need to do a trade off.
Thanks
Ajeet

BEx query based on virtual cube donu00B4t display a valid List of Value (LOV)

Hello
I have a problem with an invalid LOV. The scenario is the following; There´s a BEx query based on a virtual cube. The query has an exit variable on caracteristic that is based on 0CALMONTH.
At Universe Designer I simply create a connection, a universe based on this query and export.
At Web Intelligence (also at Live Office), when I try to execute de query, the prompt to fill my exit variable display a list of value that doesn´t match with the values of the caracteristic at the cube.
Actually, the list at the prompt starts with 01.0000 and finishes with 05.0968.
In Universe Designer, the option to edit the list of values is not available. But I think that editing the LOV is not the correct way.
I´ve tried creating a new query based on the DSO that is the source of the virtual cube. In this case, I had a valid list. Unfortunately, I can´t use this DSO.
Did anyone already have this problem?

Hi James,
can you explain what you mean with "input length for that filed" ?
The field in the table is varchar2(120). I coudn't found options for the List of value.
Thanks for your response
Carsten
null

Include Button that executes PL/SQL procedure to SQL query based region

I would like to add two columns to a SQL query region.
These columns would not be sourced from the query, but rather would be used to execute a PL/SQL procedure.
For example, I would like to have a manager approve or deny adding an additional employee to the department.
There would be one button for APPROVE. And, one button for DENY.
The PL/SQL procedure would execute to perform the required DML based upon the selected action (either APPROVE or DENY).
A sample output would look like this:
<APPROVE>, <DENY>, John Doe, Accountant
<APPROVE>, <DENY>, Jane Doe, Accountant
Is there any way to add a button to a SQL Query based report region where that button executes a stored proc? If so, what is the basic process for doing this?
Thanks!
-Reid

Is there any way to add a button to a SQL Query based report region where that button executes a stored proc? If so, what is the basic process for doing this?Conditional page item? You can associate processes with buttons on a page

SELECT QUERY BASED ON SECONDARY INDEX

Hi all,
CAN ANYONE TELL ME HOW TO WRITE SELECT QUERY BASED ON SECONDARY INDEX.
IN WHAT WAY DOES IT IMPROVE PERFORMANCE.
i KNOW WHEN CREATING SECONDARY INDEX I NEED TO GIVE AN INDEX NO -iT SHOULD BE ANY NUMBER RIGHT?
I HAVE TO LIST ALL PRIMARY KEYS FIRST AND THEN THE FIELD FOR WHICH I AM CREATING SECONDARY INDEX RIGHT?
LETS SAY I HAVE 2 PRIMARY KEYS AND I WANT TO CREATE SEONDARY INDEX FOR 2 FIELDS THEN
I NEED TO CREATE A SEPERTE SECONDARY INDEX FOR EACH ONE OF THOSE FIELDS OR ONE SHOULD BE ENOUGH
pLS LET ME KNOW IF IAM WRONG

HI,
If you cannot use the primary index to determine the result set because, for example, none of the primary index fields occur in the WHERE or HAVINGclauses, the system searches through the entire table (full table scan). For this case, you can create secondary indexes, which can restrict the number of table entries searched to form the result set.
You create secondary indexes using the ABAP Dictionary. There you can create its columns and define it as UNIQUE. However, you should not create secondary indexes to cover all possible combinations of fields.
Only create one if you select data by fields that are not contained in another index, and the performance is very poor. Furthermore, you should only create secondary indexes for database tables from which you mainly read, since indexes have to be updated each time the database table is changed. As a rule, secondary indexes should not contain more than four fields, and you should not have more than five indexes for a single database table.
What to Keep in Mind for Secondary Indexes:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/cf/21eb2d446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
http://www.sap-img.com/abap/quick-note-on-design-of-secondary-database-indexes-and-logical-databases.htm
Regards
Sudheer

Reporting on master data customer and bad performances : any workaround ?

Hello,
I've been asked to investiguate on bad performances encountered when performing reporting
on the specific master data zcustomer.
Basically this master data has a quite similar design that 0customer, there are 96000 entries in the master data table.
A simple query has been developed : the reporting is done on the master data zcustomer and its attributes : no key figure, no calculation, no restriction ...
Nevertheless, the query can not be executed .. the query runs around 10 minute in rsrt, then the private memory is exhausted and then a short dump is generated.
I tried to buid a very simple query on 0customer, this time, without the attributes ... and it took more than 30 sec before I get the results.
I checked the queries statistics :
3.x Analyzer Server 10 sec
OLAP: Read Texts : 20 sec
How is it that it is so long to performthe reporitng on those master data, while in the same time If i try to display the content in SAP by choosing "maintain master data", I have an immediate answer.
I there any workaround ?
Any help would be really appreciated.
thank you.
Raoul

Hi.
How much data have you got in the cube?
If you make no restrictions, you are asking the system to return data for all 96.000 customers. That is one thing that might take some time.
Also, using the attributes of this customer object, fx making selection or displaying several of them, means that the system has to run through the 96.000 records in masterdata to know what goes where in the report.
When you display the masterdata, you are by default displaying just the 250 or so first hits, and you are not joining against any cube or sorting the result set, so that is fast.
You should make some kind of restriction on other things than zcustomer (time, org.unit, version, etc, to limit the dataset from the cube, but also a restriction on one of the zcustomer attribs, with an index for that maybe, and performance should improve.
br
Jacob

Creating Infoset query based on ABAP program

Hello
I have 3 tables FEBEP, BKPF and BSEG and I need to join the 3 tables based on:
FEBEP-MANDT = BKPF-MANDT = BSEG-MANDT
FEBEP-NBBLN = BKPF-BELNR = BSEG-AUGBL
FEBEP-GJAHR = BKPF-GJAHR = BSEG-GJAHR
Then I have a few view fields from all the 3 tables. After this I can build an infoset query based on structure + ABAP program, and a generic datasource on top of it.
Can someone give me the ABAP code to be written SE38? Also should I select integrated program/external program in the infoset query?
Thanks,
Srini.

Hi,
Even if you create an ABAP program for infoset, you will writing a SELECT statement from BSEG table which is quite huge.
And you will putting JOIN with other tables.
Performance wise this is not advisble.
Why do not try the following other tables and check if the fields you need are available?
You can't join BSEG as it is a Cluster Table.In the place of BSEG you can use:
Account Recivables data use BSID and BSAD tables
GL Account Related data use BSIS and BSAS tables
Account payables data use BSIK and BSAK tables
Thanks.

Select query based LOV for tabular form attributes

Hi HTMLDB Team,
Congrats u all for the new release of HTMLDB in htmldb.oracle.com.
I badly need a solution of the below problem.
Say , i have table called user_col_comments now i want to display the table_name ,column_name and comments in a tabular form.I displayed only one row for the tabular form.Now i create a select query based LOV for attribute table_name where i got all table_name in drop down list.
Point is that after selecting any data from drop down table list i want to get the corresponding fields to be populated in column_name attributes.How can i wrote the select query based LOV for the attibute column_name.
I wrote it as 'select column_name d,column_name r from user_col_comments where table_name=:TABLE_NAME Its not working?
Similarly i want same thing to display for comments after matching both table_name and column_name.
Any solution to get rid of those problem will be highly appreciable...
If u need my htmldb.oracle.com userid and password to solve the problem i will sure let u email it.
Cheers,
Eman

hi rchalton,
can u plz little bit more clearer .I know hopefully u can imagine the problem and may u guide me thru proper way.....One think i understand that there must be multiple process and submit but "only when..." that u have said i cant understand that part........
U are welcome to give me proper solution.....
Thanks for the reply ....atleast one can pay hid to me.....
Cheers,
Eman

Query based taxonomy from scratch gives NoSuchMethodError...

I'm trying to create a query based taxonomy following the instuctions specified in the help docs: KM Platform -> Admin Guide -> Content Mgmt -> Taxonomies and Classification -> Creating a QBT -> from scratch. I created an index on a newly created (hence empty) folder in the 'documents' repository. So, essentially, the data source points to that folder. Also, I selected 'TREX Classification' on the 'Service' drop-down while creating the index. I left the crwler profile as blank. Then I went on to create a new 'Query Based Taxonomy'. I was able to create it alright, but as soon as I click on it to add folder and the such, I get this error:
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getDocumentTaxRMRids(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1876)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getTaxonomyClassResources(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1831)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.addChildDocuments(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:1942)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.manager.taxonomy.TaxonomyNamespaceManager.getChildren(TaxonomyNamespaceManager.java:368)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.internalGetChildren(CollectionImpl.java:966)
     at com.sapportals.wcm.repository.CollectionImpl.getChildren(CollectionImpl.java:179)
Any help in solving this is highly apprecaited.
We run EP6 SP2.
I did NOT create a 'crawler profile' for this set up.
thanks,
Biju.

Hi Biju,
re. your NW'04 SP stack 4 migration intention:
NW'04 is still in ramp-up (SP stack 4 is the current shipment bundle of it) so at the current point in time, only participating ramp-up customers can use it.
A migration from EP6.0 SP2 to NW'04 will be possible (but not during the ramp-up phase).
From a Knowledge Management & Collaboration perspective, we will port most of the NW'04 SP stack 4 functions to EP6.0 SP2 as well. These functions will be shipped as EP6.0 SP2 Patch 5 (planned shipment date beginning of Q4 / 2004) so for mid-term, you can also plan to stay on EP6.0 SP2 if you have no other pressing reasons for going to NW'04 (e.g. enhanced Web AS functions).
This feature porting from NW -> EP6.0 SP2 is an 'only-once' action, however, and NetWeaver will be the release for new features in the future.
Regards,
Joerg

CMP 6.1 Entity bad performance.

I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session bean method: around
90 ms.
I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? Should I use EJB
2.0 to have significant perf ?
Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all the application on stored
procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
My config:
WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
SGBD: Sybase
Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS (weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
Thanks

Historically its hard to get good performance & scalability out of sybase
without using stored procs. Using dynamic sql on sybase just doesnt do as
well as procs. Oracle on the other hand can get very close to stored proc
speed out of well written dynamic sql.
As far as weblogic goes, my experience is the focus of their testing for db
related stuff is Oracle, then DB2, then MSSQLServer. Sybase is usually last
on the list.
As far as the 6.1 cmp, haven't used it much, but because of these other
things I would be cautious about using it with Sybase.
Joel
"Antoine Bas" <[email protected],> wrote in message
news:3cc7cdcf$[email protected]..
>
I'am using entity 1.1 EJB on WL 6.1 and facing very bad performances:
around 150ms for an insert (i have 20 columns).
When accessing an order interface to read 2 fields in a session beanmethod: around
90 ms.
I'am very disapointed and confused. What should I look up for
to increase the performance ? Any important tuning or parameters ? ShouldI use EJB
2.0 to have significant perf ?
Thanks for any advice because we are thinking to switch all theapplication on stored
procedures. A solution without Entity and fewer stateless session beans.
My config:
WL: 6.1 on Sun sparc
SGBD: Sybase
Entity: WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB 1.1 RDBMS(weblogic-rdbms11-persistence-600.dtd)
>
Thanks

Bad performance when open a bi publisher report in excel

We use bi publisher(xml publisher) to create a customized report. For a small report, user like it very much. But for a bigger report, users complain about the performance when they open the file.
I know it is not a native excel file, that may cause the bad performance. So I ask my user to save it to a new file as a native excel format. The new file still worse than a normal excel file when we open it.
I did a test. We try to save a bi publish report to excel format, the size shrink to 4Mb. But if we "copy all" and "Paste Special" value only to a new excel file, the size is only 1Mb.
Do I have any way to improve that, users are complaining everyday. Thanks!
I did a test today.
I create a test report
Test 1: Original file from BIP in EBS is 10Mb. We save it in my local disk, when we open the file, it takes 43 sec.
Test 2: We save the file in native excel format, the file size is 2.28Mb, it takes 7 sec. to open.
Test 3: We copy all cell and "PasteSpecial" to a new excel file with value only. The file size is 1.66Mb, it takes only 1 sec to open.
Edited by: Rex Lin on 2010/3/31 下午 11:26

EBS or Standalone BIP?
If EBS see this thread for suggestions on performance tuning and hints and tips:
EBS BIP Performance Tuning - Definitive Guide?
Note also that I did end up rewriting my report as PL/SQL producing a csv file and have done with several large reports in BIP on EBS.
Cheers,
Dave

Query Based on DSO - Bad Performance

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for