Query find no records in Enter Quality Results Form (QLTRSMDF)

Hi,experts
When execute query (F11/ctrl F11) in Enter Quality Results Form (QLTRSMDF) for a particular plan,say I want to query all results in that plan,it found nothing.
In system block/last query, found that it uses occurrence and collection_id which is newly created.
And compare with the SQL used in Update Quality Results Form,there are different conditions used,say org_id is used in the Update form.
Is it okay to query results in Enter Quality Results Form (QLTRSMDF) of a plan?
or it is designed to use the Update form to query and update?
Thanks in advance!
Morris

No you have to use the View Quality Results Form (QLTRSINF) to see already entered collection results. The enter form is only to enter new collection results.

Similar Messages

Query - Find Master Records - Doesnt Child Rec

Hello Experts,
BANNER
Oracle8i Enterprise Edition Release 8.1.7.4.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 8.1.7.4.0 - Production
CORE 8.1.7.0.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 8.1.7.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 3.4.1.0.0 - Production
Below is my table - ORG_VALUE
ITEM_ID ITEM_TYPE ORG_ID
1000     TEST      222
1000     TEST_1    223
2000     TEST      322
2000     TEST_1    323
3000     TEST      222
4000     TEST      322222,322- Master Org id... 223,323 - Child Org id
I need to fetch those records which doesnt have child record for particular item in same table.
E.g; if 1000 item_id for 222 org id, then def. there should be child record 1000 for 223 org_id.
Similar for 322 and 323.
OUTPUT
ITEM_ID ITEM_TYPE ORG_ID
3000     TEST      222
4000     TEST      322Tried the following query...
SELECT     *
FROM          ORG_VALUE a
WHERE      NOT EXISTS (SELECT     1 FROM     ORG_VALUE b
          WHERE      a.item_id = b.item_id
                            and org_id IN (223, 323))
order by item_id;Is there any other query better than this one>?
Please help...

Like this (assuming child org ID always ends with 3)?
1 WITH d AS (
2 SELECT 1000 as item_id, 'TEST' as item_type, 222 AS org_id FROM dual UNION ALL
3 SELECT 1000,'TEST_1', 223 FROM dual UNION ALL
4 SELECT 2000,'TEST', 322 FROM dual UNION ALL
5 SELECT 2000,'TEST_1', 323 FROM dual UNION ALL
6 SELECT 3000,'TEST', 222 FROM dual UNION ALL
7 SELECT 4000,'TEST', 322 FROM dual)
8* SELECT item_id FROM d GROUP BY item_id HAVING(MAX(MOD(org_id,10))) != 3
SQL> /
   ITEM_ID
      4000
      3000Lukasz

Suppressing Query Find window

When we are calling a standard form(Purchase Order Summary form) from a custom form by passing PO number, how to suppress query find window and navigating directly into results window of standard form?

Actual Requirement is we are calling standard purchase order summary form from a custom form.In custom form we enter sales order number then we click find button.then PO summary form has to be opened and with corresponding PO details.
The problem i am facing is when i click on find button in custom form it is showing up query find window of PO summary form.
So how to suppress query find window and navigate directly into standard PO summary form.
And do not want to customize standard PO summary form(Called form).

Quality Results entry

Hi ,
I am working on 11.5.10.2 Quality Module.
We have Quality results entry form is available in Quality Module and at the same time we can enter quality results during PO receipt or WO completion.
If we enter quality results in quality module for a collection plan ( say for one Purchase order), will it update quality form while doing the receiving transactions.
Also I would like to know why Quality results entry form is given separetly.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Ravi

Hi Babu,
1) PO receipt transactions will be doing by Receiver
2)Quality Inspector will enter quality results in Quality module
3)Again Receiver has to complete the receving and delivery transactions.
If we enter quality results in Quality module, will it reflect in Receiving transaction collection form?
Thanks
Ravi

Cfloop query only finding one record

I can't figure this out. My query is only finding one record
(in certain instances), but there are more records in the table. It
seems to the the problem when I use "LIKE". Everything prints fine
if I use equals.
Here's my code:
<cfparam name="form.kword" default="">
<cfparam name="form.fyear" default="2008">
<cfparam name="form.fnum" default="">
<cfparam name="form.titlew" default="">
<cfparam name="form.doctrak" default="">
<cfparam name="url.sterm" default="">
<cfparam name="url.fyear" default="">
<cfparam name="url.qtype" default="">


<cfquery name="displayformresults"
datasource="#mydatasource#">
SELECT fstrkeywords, fstrdoctrak, fstrformnum, fstryear,
fstrtitle, fstrfilesize, fstrfiletype, fdtmrevdt, fblnfillin,
fstraddendum
FROM tblext_forms
WHERE fstrkeywords LIKE '%#form.kword#%' AND fstryear =
'#form.fyear#' AND fstrformnum LIKE '%#form.fnum#%' AND fstrtitle
LIKE '%#form.titlew#%' AND fstrdoctrak LIKE '%#form.doctrak#%'
ORDER BY fstrtitle, fstryear ASC
</cfquery>
<cfdump VAR="#displayformresults#">


<cfloop query="displayformresults">
<cfif "#displayformresults.fstryear#" IS "">
<cfset #displayformsesults.fstryear# = "2008">
<cfelse>
<cfset anyyeardisplay = #displayformresults.fstryear#>
</cfif>
<cfset nicefdtmrevdt =
#DateFormat(#displayformresults.fdtmrevdt#, "mm-dd-yyyy")#>
<cfoutput>
<tr>
<td
class="fifteen">#displayformresults.fstrformnum#</td>
<td class="fifteen"><cfif isDefined
("anyyeardisplay")>
#anyyeardisplay#
</cfif></td>
<td class="fortyfive"><a href=""
title="#displayformresults.fstrdoctrak#">#displayformresults.fstrtitle#</a></td>
<td class="twentyfive"><cfif isDefined
("nicefdtmrevdt")>
#nicefdtmrevdt#
</cfif>
<br />
(#displayformresults.fstrfiletype#,
#displayformresults.fstrfilesize#)</td>
</tr>
</cfoutput>

Help with Finding Duplicate records Query

HI,
I am trying to write a query that will find duplicate records/cases.
This query will be used in a report.
So, here are the requirements:
I need to find duplicate cases/records based on the following fields:
DOB, DOCKET, SENT_DATEI was able to do that with the following query. The query below is able to give me all duplicate records based on the Criteria above
SELECT      DEF.BIRTH_DATE DOB,
           S.DOCKET DOCKET,
           S.SENT_VIO_DATE SENT_DATE, COUNT(*)
FROM SENTENCES S,
            DEFENDANTS DEF
WHERE      S.DEF_ID = DEF.DEF_ID
AND       S.CASE_TYPE_CODE = 10
GROUP BY DEF.BIRTH_DATE, S.DOCKET, S.SENT_VIO_DATE
HAVING COUNT(*) > 1;
//I AM GOING TO CALL THIS QUERY 'X'Now, the information to be displayed on the report: defendants Name, DOB, District, Docket, Def Num, Sent Date, and PACTS Num if possible.
The problem that I need help on is how to combine those queries together (what I mean is a sub query). the 'X' query returns multiple values. please have a look at the comments on the query below to see what I'm trying to achieve.
here is the main query:
SELECT      INITCAP(DEF.LAST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.FIRST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.MIDDLE_NAME) DEFENDANT_NAME,
        DEF.BIRTH_DATE DOB,
        TRIM(DIST.DISTRICT_NAME) DISTRICT_NAME,
        S.DOCKET DOCKET,
        S.DEF_NUM DEF_NUM,
        S.SENT_VIO_DATE SENT_DATE,
        DEF.PACTS_ID PACTS_NUM
FROM      USSC_CASES.DEFENDANTS DEF,
        USSC_CASES.SENTENCES S,
        LOOKUP.DISTRICTS DIST
WHERE      DEF.DEF_ID = S.DEF_ID
AND      S.DIST_ID = DIST.USSC_DISTRICT_ID
AND     S.CASE_TYPE_CODE = 10
AND     S.USSC_ID IS NOT NULL
AND // what i'm trying to do is: DOB, DOCKET, SENT_DATE IN ('X' QUERY), is this possible ??
ORDER BY DEFENDANT_NAME; thanks in advance.
I am using Oracle 11g, and sql developer.
if my approach doesn't work, is there a better approach ?
Edited by: Rooney on Jul 11, 2012 3:50 PM

If I got it right, you want to join table USSC_CASES.DEFENDANTS to duplicate rows in USSC_CASES. If so:
SELECT INITCAP(DEF.LAST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.FIRST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.MIDDLE_NAME) DEFENDANT_NAME,
        DEF.BIRTH_DATE DOB,
        TRIM(DIST.DISTRICT_NAME) DISTRICT_NAME,
        S.DOCKET DOCKET,
        S.DEF_NUM DEF_NUM,
        S.SENT_VIO_DATE SENT_DATE,
        DEF.PACTS_ID PACTS_NUM
FROM USSC_CASES.DEFENDANTS DEF,
         SELECT *
           FROM (
                  SELECT S.*,
                          COUNT(*) OVER(PARTITION BY DEF.BIRTH_DATE, S.DOCKET, S.SENT_VIO_DATE) CNT
                    FROM USSC_CASES.SENTENCES S
           WHERE CNT > 1
        ) S,
        LOOKUP.DISTRICTS DIST
WHERE DEF.DEF_ID = S.DEF_ID
   AND S.DIST_ID = DIST.USSC_DISTRICT_ID
   AND S.CASE_TYPE_CODE = 10
   AND S.USSC_ID IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY DEFENDANT_NAME;If you want to exclude duplicates from the query and do not care which row out of duplicate rows to choose:
SELECT INITCAP(DEF.LAST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.FIRST_NAME) || ' ' || INITCAP(DEF.MIDDLE_NAME) DEFENDANT_NAME,
        DEF.BIRTH_DATE DOB,
        TRIM(DIST.DISTRICT_NAME) DISTRICT_NAME,
        S.DOCKET DOCKET,
        S.DEF_NUM DEF_NUM,
        S.SENT_VIO_DATE SENT_DATE,
        DEF.PACTS_ID PACTS_NUM
FROM USSC_CASES.DEFENDANTS DEF,
         SELECT *
           FROM (
                  SELECT S.*,
                          ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY DEF.BIRTH_DATE, S.DOCKET, S.SENT_VIO_DATE ORDER BY 1) RN
                    FROM USSC_CASES.SENTENCES S
           WHERE RN = 1
        ) S,
        LOOKUP.DISTRICTS DIST
WHERE DEF.DEF_ID = S.DEF_ID
   AND S.DIST_ID = DIST.USSC_DISTRICT_ID
   AND S.CASE_TYPE_CODE = 10
   AND S.USSC_ID IS NOT NULL
ORDER BY DEFENDANT_NAME;SY.

Quality results query by Item or PO

Hi,
Is there any way to check quality results by Item/PO/Work order.
I see in Quality Inquiry, we can see by collection plan.
But as a user I do not know which collection plan assigned to item.
Thank in Advance
Ravi

Hi Ravi,
Pl try this script identify the colletion plan item based.
select a.name, a.effective_from, a.effective_to from qa_plans a, QA_PLAN_TRANSACTIONS b, QA_PLAN_COLLECTION_TRIGGERS c
where a.PLAN_ID = b.PLAN_ID and
b.PLAN_TRANSACTION_ID = c.PLAN_TRANSACTION_ID and
c.LOW_VALUE ='<ITEMCODE>' and ----------- Enter the item code
a.EFFECTIVE_TO is null
Regards
Babu.J
If it's Correct/Helpful Answer pls mark it.

FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved

hi
apps--12.0.6 os--IBM AIX on POWER Systems (64-bit)
When trying to find service request (e.g. 33599) throws a FORMS note: “FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved”. This is happening in FORMS.
Regards

When trying to find service request (e.g. 33599) throws a FORMS note: “FRM-40350: Query caused no records to be retrieved”. This is happening in FORMS.Some Service Requests Are Not Accessable - Error FRM-40350 [ID 602803.1]
Service Requests Cannot Be Retrieved When Using Folders - Error FRM-40350 [ID 744321.1]
How To Research An Item That Errors FRM-40350 And Cannot Be Queried In The Master Or Organization Items Form [ID 413104.1
Unable To Access Upgraded Service Request In the CSXSRISR Form [ID 462543.1]
R12: Cost Management Drilldown Throws ORA-01403: No data found [ID 782062.1]
FRM-92100 Error in The Workbench Tab After Find For A Service Request [ID 458115.1]
"Frm-40301: Query Caused No Records To Be Retrieved. Re-Enter" While Querying Some SRs In Create Service Request Form [ID 1324909.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Query find form - customized search on a date field

Hi All,
I have a form which has query find behaviour enabled. When the user press on the search(torch light button) The query find form gets opened in a new canvas.
I have a date field on the query find form. The current functionality is that
"The form searches for the exact match on the date" but I want to have the results which satisfy <= "entered date".
How do I achieve it in Query find form.
Do I need to have the where condition appended in the Pre-Query on the results data block.
Please help me with an example. Thank you.
Srinivasa Mouli
Edited by: 889427 on 4 Oct, 2011 11:43 AM

Short of adding your own query extensions, you must pass in a Date
parameter vs some stringified version.
Paresh wrote:
I want to query on a date field as follows
"createDate < '2003-08-20 12:00:00:000' "
createDate has DataType java.util.Date
When I try to execute this query it throws UserException.
If I use a parameter in the query string and pass a date object to execute
method then it works fine.
I just want to make sure that there in no way I can make the first
approach work
Steve Kim
[email protected]
SolarMetric Inc.
http://www.solarmetric.com

How to find a record then edit using sql server management studio

Hello,
A very basic question:
I want to find a record stored in MS SQL Server 2008 express database table then edit the record.
I tried to do it using SQL Server 2008 management studio express because I have been using MS Access database all the time. I have right clicked the table in management studio, clicked the "Edit top 200 records" menu item then when records were
displayed on the result pane, I pressed Ctrl + F key to find a student named Simon for example. Well, nothing happened. I couldn't see any dialog boxes for putting in the search criteria.
I guess I cannot simply use Ctrl+F in SQL Server management studio to find / edit a record.
Can someone please teach me how to find a record specifying a search criteria then edit the record in SQL server management studio?

Hi ZKM128,
I have not seen Ctrl+F to be used to look for desired rows in Sql server.
On the result pane after you selected "Edit top 200 records", just right click , select
PANE, SQL, you will get the T-Sql query t,here you need to mention the exact criteria which you are looking for, and then you will get the desired rows and then you can edit.
Thanks
Manish
Please use Marked as Answer if my post solved your problem and use
Vote As Helpful if a post was useful.

Find first record starting with most extensive ability

Hi,
This question might have been asked before but I don't know how to describe it in the search field.
There are 3 records with 2 fields (id, name). These records are:
1,Amsterdam
2,Amster
3,Am
I want to find the record that holds the most possible information:
searching Amsterdam must return 1; searching Amsterdamned must return 1; searching America must return 3; searching United must return 0 (or null).
So the logic is to search for the whole string and return the id when found. If not found remove the most right character and search until found or a empty string.
Since this logic has to be a part of SQL I wonder if there is a smart way (without writing a PL/SQL function) to solve this?
I'm curious.
Geert.

Hi, Geert,
So you're only interested in strings that start the same way? That is, the fact that 'Amsterdam' and 'United' have the substring 'te' in common doesn't matter, because 'te' comes in the middle of those strings.
If that's so, you can use LIKE to compare the strings.
WITH   got_r_num    AS
     SELECT     p.place_name
     ,     a.place_id
     ,     a.place_name     AS a_place_name          -- Not needed, nut may be nice
     ,     RANK () OVER ( PARTITION BY p.place_name
                           ORDER BY          LENGTH (a.place_name) DESC
                    ) AS r_num
     FROM          possible_places p
     LEFT OUTER JOIN      actual_places       a ON p.place_name LIKE a.place_name || '%'
SELECT       place_name
,       NVL (place_id, 0)     AS place_id     -- or, if you want NULL, just place_id
,       a_place_name                       -- if wanted
FROM       got_r_num
WHERE       r_num     = 1
ORDER BY place_name
;Whenever you have a problem, please post CREATE TABLE and INSERT statments for some sample data, like this:
CREATE TABLE     actual_places
(   place_id     NUMBER (6)     PRIMARY KEY
,   place_name     VARCHAR2 (20)
INSERT INTO actual_places (place_id, place_name) VALUES (1, 'Amsterdam');
INSERT INTO actual_places (place_id, place_name) VALUES (2, 'Amster');
INSERT INTO actual_places (place_id, place_name) VALUES (3, 'Am');
CREATE TABLE     possible_places
(   place_name     VARCHAR2 (20)     PRIMARY KEY
INSERT INTO possible_places (place_name) VALUES ('Amsterdam');
INSERT INTO possible_places (place_name) VALUES ('Amsterdamned');
INSERT INTO possible_places (place_name) VALUES ('America');
INSERT INTO possible_places (place_name) VALUES ('United');Also, post the results you want from that data, exactly as you want to see them. The query above produces this output:
PLACE_NAME             PLACE_ID A_PLACE_NAME
America                       3 Am
Amsterdam                     1 Amsterdam
Amsterdamned                  1 Amsterdam
United                        0See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}

Alternative to find unique records with 60 character in selection string.

Hi,
We have to find out the values from the Infoobject. When we try to display data from an master object, the maximum length of selection it accepts 45 characters only but we need to input data around 60 characters in selection.
Thing we tried:
1. Selecting complete data without any condition but it did not work due to large volume of data.
2. We tried to extract data from RSA3 but it did not work due to large volume of data.
Please suggest me alternative to find unique records with 60 character in selection string.
Regards,
Himanshu Panchal.

This sounds a bit strange. Are you perhaps mistakenly storing text data incorrectly as the primary key of the master data? I can't think of any actual data that is that length to ensure usinqueness - even GUIDs are maximum 32 characters - but GUIDs don't count as actual "readable" data although you do need to be able to select it from time to time. Perhaps you have a super secure password hash or something like it ?
Also are you expecting to have a unique single record returned by your selection? To do this would in general REQUIRE that ALL the data is read because master data is not stored in the DB sorted by the data itself, but stored instead sorted by the it's SID.
When you say you are selecting data from master data, which master data tables are you using? I have been able to select data from very large MD table (15 million unique records) using SE16 with no problems. Just enter the table name, and before you execute just count the number of records - it helps to know what you want to end up with.
Have you tried using wild cards (the *) to preselect a smaller number of records : * a bit of your 60 character string *
If you are trying to select from a non-key field you will encounter performance issues, but you can still use the wildcards, and get a result.
Don't use RSA3 it was designed to make selections and group them into datapackets. It's not the same as selecting directly on the table in SE11 or SE16

Error in query find window

Hi All,
I am using oracle apps r12 and forms 10g.
I was trying to develop a query_find form and i have followed this link for reference,
http://erpschools.com/articles/query_find-form-in-oracle-apps
After doing all the steps when i click NEW button my my Main Datablock is opening for entering new records, When entered existing po_number and click FIND Button i getting error like
FRM-41003 This function cannot be performed here.
Can any one pls correct what i went wrong.
Thanks & Regards
Srikkanth

Please see if (Basing a Block on a Stored Procedure - Sample Code [ID 66887.1]) helps.
Thanks,
Hussein

Name in Find User Results Form

Hi:
I need to hide (or quit) the first column (Name) in Find User Results Form. It is possible?. There is a function that indicates all of columns, but the first column is not there.
If is not possible to hide or quit it, can i move it to another position?
Any idea?
Thanks.
MJ.

Here is the summary:
To set attribute view visibility/query indexing/accounts list view,
edit in UserUIConfig.xml ->
SummaryAttrNames
QueryableAttrNames
AppletColumns
To modify Accounts Find Users and search results,
edit idm/sample/userSearchDefaults.xml
getSearchableAttrs
getResultColumns
If you do this method, you will not need to edit
Find User Form
OR
Find User Results Form !
This simplifies the problem greatly.
I hope this helps somebody, because i didn't get any info from the forums.
-jason

Low quality DVD outcome.. need help for high quality result ASAP!

Hi every 1,
(This is my first post, as I only got my iMac 2 weeks ago.. so please be gentle with me :P )
I have just been asked to turn a Microsoft powerpoint (PPT) into a DVD for "induction training video" purposes with voice overs and backing music. I have a professional music studio so providing high quality audio is fine, but trying to turn the power point into a high quality DVD file is my problem. This powerpoint has timing transitions (fade ins etc) for the timing of voice gaps. When using Microsoft PPT, you can turn the PPT into a Quicktime file which I was going to drop into iMoive then add the music and voiceovers.. this is when my problems started. Microsofts powerpoint doesn't add the transtiions and effect into render Quicktime movie, so I thought as my new iMac has iWork (KEYNOTE) I'd give it a try and to my surprise it all worked and the final mpeg4 quicktime movie result work great _when you look at it on the MAC_.
1) Problem
I then exported the file into iMovie and then my first Problem arose.... (grr). I movie lost it's sharpness and the images started to have pixelation.. that seemed to pulse in 1 seconds gaps.
I hope this was just an issue with the iMovie preview window and thought once I put it into iDVD and burnt it... the final result may be fine.. but I was wrong and the quality was crap... with the pixelation still there.
2) Problem
The other problem that came up was the about 25% of the edge of the total screen was cutoff. When i did the original file, I choose 4:3 ratio, and watched it on this..so where did the image size go wrong.. I also choose the "high quality" Quicktime file, but didn't go into the settings in the iMovie in the export section (which I should off), but after check the compression type was H.264.. and I also didn't change any settings in the 'export file' section in KEYNOTE.. this is where I think I must have gone wrong..
So in closing. my questions is:
-What's the best way to turn a PPT into a _high quality file_ so it looks professional once it goes through iMovie and iDVD.. or
- Should I just redo the whole production using iMovie ( by re doing all the work eg wording, transistion inside iMovie seems like a lot of extra word ) and so not use the PPT at all... and if I do this, then
- What's sizes, and ratio and compressions should I use for 4:3 ratio TV purpose (eg. whats size should a background image be that I do inside Photoshop, so I can put the transition wording over the top, so I see it on the TV screen and the edge doesn't get cutoff etc.?
I was very impressed with Keynote and would be happy to use this for most of the production.. but am I banging my head againist a wall...re fixing quality problems when exporting files into... can someone shed some light on this for me?
Sorry this is such a big post.. but I thought if I gave you most of the background you would have to ask so many questions.
Look forward to any help any 1 can provide..
Michael
Message was edited by: sycosingo

Matti,
Thx so much for your help.. it's really appreciated. This is by far the best result quality wise, (but I really am a perfectionist and personally are still not overall happy with the final product) but if my client is happy.. then I will continue down this track for this job.
ie Create TIFF;'s>Quicktime PRO>iMovie (transistions)>iDvd
You've been a great help and I hope it good enough for the client.
I find the images and wording lose their sharpness only after being imported into iMoive. I could still be probably enhance the quality level of the TIFF's once more, as I did the test slides in Keynote, then exported the 5 slides a individual as TIFFS out of Keynote, then imported the into QuickTime Pro as you suggested then followed your instructions all the way to the final burning of the CD. I also tried doing this in Photoshop using your suggestion of 720x576 images (for PAL) .. pixel aspect ratio to ~1.094 so you can see the correct proportions for 4:3 video output. When creating the new slide in Photoshop there were a few extra settings other than the ones you gave me... _so I would real appreciate what every setting should be when creating the NEW TIFF file in Photoshop for PAL 4:3._ I noticed when I did this the image crispness on the fonts was shithouse pixelated and shadows, even while looking at it from inside Photoshop )
As I tried mutliple ways of importing into iMovie (yours being the best suggestion) I really believe when dragging a TIFF or movie turns to blur on the way into iMoive. You can see the image is blurred from that point on.... _do I need to buy final cut pro or express to get a better image quality result?_
I also tried iMoive7, which I found was great to use video editing wise, but Apples has definitely stuffed up there by not give users a 'time line' to work with in the Audio section... but everything else in the video area was great to use.., but in my situation trying to line up the narration to slide, while having also background music is now impossible sadly.
Also I really like the 3D transitions in KEYNOTE, plus iMovie 7.. do you know if there are available for HD6 or if there's a 3rd party company that has smilar versions
Thx again,
sycosingo
Message was edited by: sycosingo

Query find no records in Enter Quality Results Form (QLTRSMDF)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for