Query in From clause
Post Author: pranathi20
CA Forum: Formula
Hi All,
Can someone tell me how to get the data from the sub query in a from clause? Below is the query:
SELECT x.created_on, x.ssn, x.age , max(DECODE(x.rn,1,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO001 , max(DECODE(x.rn,4,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO116 , x.nlsipvsc
FROM (SELECT nlsiview.created_on created_on , nlsiview.ssn ssn , nlsiview.age age , nlsiview.answer nlsi_answer , ROW_NUMBER() rn FROM nlsiview ) x GROUP BY x.created_on, x.ssn, x.age
Post Author: pranathi20
CA Forum: Formula
Hi Yangster,
I missed out the PARTITION BY clause in the query. Please look beow for the complete code:
SELECT x.created_on, x.ssn, x.age , max(DECODE(x.rn,1,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO001 , max(DECODE(x.rn,4,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO115 , max(DECODE(x.rn,4,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO116 , x.nlsipvsc
FROM (SELECT nlsiview.created_on created_on , nlsiview.ssn ssn , nlsiview.age age , nlsiview.answer nlsi_answer , ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY nlsiview.created_on, nlsiview.ssn ORDER BY NULL) rn FROM nlsiview ) x GROUP BY x.created_on, x.ssn, x.age ORDER BY x.created_on, x.ssn /
DECODE is like a "If then else" statement in SQL, the above code means max(DECODE(x.rn,1,x.nlsi_answer)) BIO001, if x.rn =1 then print x.nsi_answer.
Please help
Thanks
Similar Messages
-
Nested query in FROM clause causes 'SQL Command not properly ended' error
SELECT sj.job_id AS job_id, 'STATUS_AWAITING_PREPARATION' AS job_status, sjr.email_sys_attach_filename AS attach_filename, sje.emailaddr as emailaddr_lastsentto
FROM arsnd_jobs sj, (SELECT emailaddr from ARSND_JOB_EMAILS where job_id=sj.job_id AND ROW_NUM=1) as SJE, ARSND_JOB_QUEUE sjq,ARSND_JOB_RECIPIENTS sjr
WHERE sj.job_id=sjq.job_id and sj.job_id=sjr.job_id
AND sjq.PROCESSING_STATE=0
ORDER BY sj.created
I don't see anything wrong with the above query, it fails with 'SQL Command not properly ended'.
If I remove the usage of the nested query in the FROM clause, then it doesn't give that error. Please advice what I'm doing wrong.Pls try
SELECT sj.job_id AS job_id, 'STATUS_AWAITING_PREPARATION' AS job_status, sjr.email_sys_attach_filename AS attach_filename, sje.emailaddr as emailaddr_lastsentto
FROM arsnd_jobs sj, (SELECT emailaddr from ARSND_JOB_EMAILS where job_id=sj.job_id AND ROW_NUM=1) SJE, ARSND_JOB_QUEUE sjq,ARSND_JOB_RECIPIENTS sjr
WHERE sj.job_id=sjq.job_id and sj.job_id=sjr.job_id
AND sjq.PROCESSING_STATE=0
ORDER BY sj.created
I have removed the 'as' clause you used for alias of the subquery. It should work fine now..... -
Block based on "From clause query" and substitution variable
Hi Folks,
I have a "From clause query" block type, which is based on query that uses a substitution variable (:BLOCK.COLUMN) from previous block. When I run a query, then I obtain an error: ORA-01008: not all variables bound.
My query looks like:
select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
from
select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
from repay_scheds r,
fac_prods f
where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
and r.fac_no = :B2.FAC_NO
and r.trans_ref_from is not null
and r.status <> 'P'
group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code
group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
having max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) > 0Once I replace that substitution variable in query condition with some exact test number then it works fine.
select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
from
select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
from repay_scheds r,
fac_prods f
where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
and r.fac_no = 2012500
and r.trans_ref_from is not null
and r.status <> 'P'
group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code
group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
having max(decode(sched_type_code,'ROLLOVER',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,'INTCHG',amt,decode(sched_type_code,'FEEREC',amt,0))) > 0How can I use substitution variable within query for "From clause query" block type? Or any other way how to get the same result?
Thanks for your reply.
TomasI have a solution:
Before entering block I'm calling function, that populates my block:
PROCEDURE POP_<<MY_BLOCK>>_BLOCK IS
query_txt varchar2(2000);
BEGIN
query_txt := '(select seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code,
max(decode(sched_type_code,''ROLLOVER'',amt,0)) OUTSTD_DRAW,
max(decode(sched_type_code,''INTCHG'',amt,decode(sched_type_code,''FEEREC'',amt,0))) OUTSTD_INTEREST_FEE
from
select r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code,sum(nvl(rep_amt,0)) amt
from repay_scheds r,
fac_prods f
where r.fac_no = f.fac_no
and r.prod_code = f.prd_code
and r.prod_seq_no = f.seq_no
and r.fac_no = '||:B2.FAC_NO||'
and r.trans_ref_from is not null
and r.status <> ''P''
group by r.fac_no, r.prod_code, f.descr, r.prod_seq_no, r.curr_code, r.sched_type_code
group by seq_no, prod_code, descr, curr_code
having max(decode(sched_type_code,''ROLLOVER'',amt,0)) >0 or max(decode(sched_type_code,''INTCHG'',amt,decode(sched_type_code,''FEEREC'',amt,0))) > 0)';
Go_Block('<<MY_BLOCK>>' );
Clear_Block ;
Set_Block_Property( '<<MY_BLOCK>>', QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME, query_txt) ;
-- populate my block --
Execute_Query ;
END;Thanks,
Tomas -
FROM Clause query data source type
i do i get the result set of a FROM Clause datasource into an item.
A FROM clause may be used as the datasource for a data block. A FROM clause is a feature of the Oracle8 Server that allows you to nest a SELECT statement in the FROM clause of a SELECT statement. A FROM clause is a valid query block datasource, but it is not a valid DML block datasource. The value returned from a FROM clause is a subset of records from the original query.
FROM clauses are used to perform joins, lookups, and calculations without having to create a view on the server. FROM clauses can also be used to prototype views and to increase performance.
Using a FROM clause as a block datasource is similar to using an updateable join-view as a block datasource. However, a FROM clause provides more control, because the presence of a DBA is not required to define the view. You should note that the FROM clause produces results that are identical to an updateable join-view from the client side, but that there is no defined view on the server.
My question has not been answere and i hope the above copies explanation from forms6i documentation will help understand the question better.
Please Advise -
Can't get query to work. table alias in subquery in FROM clause
How can I rearrange this query to work?
SELECT
TO_CHAR(dt.date_time, 'YYYY-MM-DD') start_date,
(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM
(SELECT DISTINCT a.non_asp, a.start_time, a.end_time
FROM appointments a
WHERE a.start_time >= dt.date_time AND a.start_time < dt.date_time + 1
) num_overlap
FROM
table(times_pkg.between_times(TO_DATE('2010-05-30'),
TO_DATE('2010-07-03'), 60*24, 'Y')) dtbetween_times is a table function that returns times at given intervals.
I am trying to get a count of distinct (non_asp, start_time, end_time) sets that fall on each day.
However, it doesn't recognize dt.date_time in the FROM clause.Hi,
A sub-query can be correlated only to its immediate parent. You're trying the correlate the SELECT DISTINCT sub-query to its grandparent.
You can re-write the sub-query as a join, like this:
SELECT TO_CHAR(dt.date_time, 'YYYY-MM-DD') start_date,
a.num_overlap
FROM table ( times_pkg.between_times ( TO_DATE('2010-05-30'),
TO_DATE('2010-07-03'),
60*24,
'Y'
) dt
JOIN (
SELECT start_time,
end_time,
COUNT (DISTINCT non_asp) AS num_overlap
FROM appointments
) a ON a.start_time >= dt.date_time
AND a.start_time < dt.date_time + 1
;You could also eliminate the extra level between the SELECT DISTINCT sub-query and the main query by using SELECT (DISTINCT ...). -
Using FROM clause query in block
I have a block using a FROM clause query instead of a table. I have two items in the block that correspond to the select statement. Here's the SQL statement I've entered:
SELECT BEZEICHNUNG, ZEIT_TYP_NR
FROM ZEIT_TYPE
WHERE ZEIT_TYP_NR IN
(SELECT ZEIT_TYP_NR
FROM PROM_ZEIT_TYP
WHERE PROM_TYP_NR = :GLOBAL.PROM_TYP_NR)
When I run forms, it ADDS to my SQL statement!! Here's what it does:
SELECT BEZEICHNUNG,ZEIT_TYP_NR
FROM (SELECT BEZEICHNUNG, ZEIT_TYP_NR FROM ZEIT_TYPE) WHERE ZEIT_TYP_NR IN
(SELECT ZEIT_TYP_NR
FROM PROM_ZEIT_TYP
WHERE PROM_TYP_NR = :1)
can anyone tell me why it's adding this first line to my select statement??"a from clause query" is the rather strange name forms uses for what is generally known as in an in-line view.
Your in-line view is being treated by forms the same way as it would a table, it sticks a SELECT, a list of columns determined from the database items in the block and a FROM on the beginning. If the user specifies query criteria in enter-query mode it will quite correctly apply the where clause to the outer select rather than to the in-line view. -
Query data source type = procedure or from clause
1)I have a form where a block is based on a from clause. In the source name I entered a simple sql statement.
Isn't the items suppose to show without any other action or
WHAT ELSE DO I NEED TO DO IN ORDER TO SEE THE BLOCK ITEMS EQUIVALENT TO THE COLUMNS IN THE QUERY?
2) I have a form where a block is based on a procedure.
First I created a package in a program unit with the procedures query_procedure, insert_procedure, update_procedure, delete_procedure and lock_procedure.
Then I set the query data source name to the package query_procedure. The columns and arguments were automatically filled by Forms - they are fine as well.
Forms automatically created the block triggers insert-procedure,delete-procedure, update-procedure and lock-procedure.
Everything seems to be fine but when I run the form and execute the query I get frm 40505 - unable to perform query.
What am i doing wrong?
This is the package:
PACKAGE pkgdeptemp IS
type dept_emp is record (
empno number(4),
ename varchar2(10),
job varchar2(9),
hiredate date,
sal number(7,2),
deptno number(2),
dname varchar2(14));
success constant number :=0;
type dept_emp_ref is ref cursor return dept_emp;
type dept_emp_tab is table of dept_emp index by binary_integer;
procedure query_procedure (resultset in out dept_emp_ref, p_empno in number);
procedure lock_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab);
procedure insert_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab);
procedure update_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab);
procedure delete_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab);
END;
PACKAGE BODY pkgdeptemp IS
function get_success return number is
begin
return(success);
end;
procedure query_procedure (resultset in out dept_emp_ref, p_empno in number) is
begin
open resultset for
select e.empno, e.ename, e.job, e.hiredate, e.sal, e.deptno, d.dname
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno = d.deptno
and e.empno = nvl(p_empno, e.empno);
end query_procedure;
procedure lock_procedure(dmlset in out dept_emp_tab) is
tempout number(4);
begin
for i in 1..dmlset.count loop
select empno
into tempout
from emp
where empno = dmlset(i).empno
for update;
end loop;
end lock_procedure;
procedure insert_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab) is
cursor c_dept (i binary_integer) is
select deptno
from dept
where deptno = dmlset(i).deptno;
tempout number(4);
begin
for i in 1..dmlset.count loop
open c_dept(i);
fetch c_dept into tempout;
if c_dept%notfound then
insert into dept(deptno,dname)
values(dmlset(i).deptno, dmlset(i).dname);
end if;
close c_dept;
insert into emp (empno,ename,job,hiredate,sal,deptno)
values (dmlset(i).empno, dmlset(i).ename, dmlset(i).job, dmlset(i).hiredate, dmlset(i).sal, dmlset(i).deptno);
end loop;
end insert_procedure;
procedure update_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab) is
cursor c_dept (i binary_integer) is
select deptno
from dept
where deptno = dmlset(i).deptno;
tempout number(4);
begin
for i in 1..dmlset.count loop
open c_dept(i);
fetch c_dept into tempout;
if c_dept%notfound then
insert into dept(deptno,dname)
values(dmlset(i).deptno, dmlset(i).dname);
else
update dept
set deptno=dmlset(i).deptno,
dname=dmlset(i).dname;
end if;
close c_dept;
update emp
set empno=dmlset(i).empno,
ename=dmlset(i).ename,
job=dmlset(i).job,
hiredate=dmlset(i).hiredate,
sal=dmlset(i).sal,
deptno=dmlset(i).deptno;
end loop;
end update_procedure;
procedure delete_procedure (dmlset in out dept_emp_tab) is
begin
for i in 1..dmlset.count loop
delete from emp where empno = dmlset(i).empno;
end loop;
end delete_procedure;
END;for ur q1:
create the text items manually in the layout editor or in the obj navigator then specify there properties manually in the the pallette.
database item = yes
column name = field name in ur select statement
for q2:
try running the form again and press F8 then if an error occur press F1 or shift F1 to show the error in ur code.
i suspect u forgot to specify a value for the in parameter the reason why u get an error that is specify the actual parameter for ur in argument then press F8.
enjoy! -
Query results varying with unused table in from clause
Hi all,
I have table (processing_table2) specified in the FROM clause of SQL query but I havent used any of its value in the SQL statement but it still affects the results of the query. Please help me here as i am clueless.
Below is the query provided
SELECT SUM((CREV.sadc_extd*CSSP.redit_pcnt)/100)
FROM revenue_lines crev,
sales_split cssp,
processing_table2
WHERE crev.order_num='7631090072'
Results of the above query : 344028065018.359
SELECT
SUM((CREV.sadc_extd*CSSP.redit_pcnt)/100)
FROM revenue_lines crev,
sales_split cssp
WHERE crev.order_num='7631090072'
Results of the above query :26463697309.1046
Some one suggest me here pls !!!!924804 wrote:
Hi all,
I have table (processing_table2) specified in the FROM clause of SQL query but I havent used any of its value in the SQL statement but it still affects the results of the query. Please help me here as i am clueless.
Below is the query provided
SELECT SUM((CREV.sadc_extd*CSSP.redit_pcnt)/100)
FROM revenue_lines crev,
sales_split cssp,
processing_table2
WHERE crev.order_num='7631090072'
Results of the above query : 344028065018.359
SELECT
SUM((CREV.sadc_extd*CSSP.redit_pcnt)/100)
FROM revenue_lines crev,
sales_split cssp
WHERE crev.order_num='7631090072'
Results of the above query :26463697309.1046
Some one suggest me here pls !!!!CARTESIAN PRODUCT changes result set -
From Clause query with form variables
forms 9.0.4 rdbms 9.2
Is it possible to create a From Clause query with form variables generated from another block (but in the same form)? I am not having any success.
I searched Metalink. It appears that according to DOC ID # 69884.1, in Forms 6i, this is not possible. Metalink suggest in DOC ID 104771.1 implementating a dynamic From Clause, but when I duplicate the example on my system, I receive an Oracle error. Further investigation from the web form (DISPLAY ERROR) indicates that the system does not see the dynamic value.
Has anyone else run into this error? Has this been fixed in forms 9.0.4 and I am just missing something? Does a dynamic from clause query work? Can anyone point me to an example or post an example or offer any advise.
thanks in advanceAs far as I know it is not possible to use block items in a from clause query in forms 9.0.4. Here is my solution for a From-Clause-Query via the 'Query-Data-Source-Name-Property':
To use the values of the block items in my from clause query I implemented a database package with getter and setter routines for the block item values I needed for the query.
In the Key-Exeqry-Trigger of the From-Clause-Query-Block I set the global package variables with values of the block-items I am interested in. In the From-Clause-Query I used the values in the where-clause via package functions which return the global package variables.
Hope my solution will work for your problem. -
Need help with writing a query with dynamic FROM clause
Hi Folks,
I need help with an query that should generate the "FROM" clause dynamically.
My main query is as follows
select DT_SKEY, count(*)
from *???*
where DT_SKEY between 20110601 and 20110719
group by DT_SKEY
having count(*) = 0
order by 1; The "from" clause of the above query should be generated as below
select 'Schema_Name'||'.'||TABLE_NAME
from dba_tables
where OWNER = 'Schema_Name'Simply sticking the later query in the first query does not work.
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Thanks
rogers42Hi,
rogers42 wrote:
Hi Folks,
I need help with an query that should generate the "FROM" clause dynamically.
My main query is as follows
select DT_SKEY, count(*)
from *???*
where DT_SKEY between 20110601 and 20110719
group by DT_SKEY
having count(*) = 0
order by 1; The "from" clause of the above query should be generated as below
select 'Schema_Name'||'.'||TABLE_NAME
from dba_tables
where OWNER = 'Schema_Name'
Remember that anything inside quotes is case-sensitive. Is the owner really "Schema_Name" with a capital S and a capital N, and 8 lower-case letters?
Simply sticking the later query in the first query does not work.Right; the table name must be given when you compile the query. It's not an expression that you can generate in the query itself.
Any pointers will be appreciated.In SQL*Plus, you can do something like the query bleow.
Say you want to count the rows in scott.emp, but you're not certain that the name is emp; it could be emp_2011 or emp_august, or anything else that starts with e. (And the name could change every day, so you can't just look it up now and hard-code it in a query that you want to run in the future.)
Typically, how dynamic SQL works is that some code (such as a preliminary query) gets some of the information you need to write the query first, and you use that information in a SQL statement that is compiled and run after that. For example:
-- Preliminary Query:
COLUMN my_table_name_col NEW_VALUE my_table_name
SELECT table_name AS my_table_name_col
FROM all_tables
WHERE owner = 'SCOTT'
AND table_name LIKE 'E%';
-- Main Query:
SELECT COUNT (*) AS cnt
FROM scott.&my_table_name
;This assumes that the preliminary query will find exactly one row; that is, it assumes that SCOTT has exactly one table whose name starts with E. Could you have 0 tables in the schema, or more than 1? If so, what results would you want? Give a concrete example, preferably suing commonly available tables (like those in the SCOTT schema) so that the poepl who want to help you can re-create the problem and test their ideas.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 11, 2011 2:30 PM -
Can we write query for fomatted search without from clause
can we write query for fomatted search without from clause as below.
SELECT (($(u_amt)*14)/100)
here U_amt is a UDF .I want to assign this to another field .
Rgds,
RajeevHi Rajeev,
You can write query for FMS without from. That is because you can omit it when you get value from active form by default. The grammar of it is:
Select $[$38.u_amt.0\] * 14/100 in your case if you have item type marketing document @line level.
From View-System Information, you can get the info you need for your FMS query at the left bottom of your screen.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Poor query performance when I have select ...xmlsequence in from clause
Here is my query and it takes forever to execute. When I run the xmlsequence query alone, it takes a few seconds. But once added to from clause and I execute the query below together, it takes too long. Is there a better way to do the same?
What I am doing here is what is there in t1 should not be there in what is returned from the subquery (xmlsequence).
select distinct t1.l_type l_type,
TO_CHAR(t1.dt1,'DD-MON-YY') dt1 ,
TO_CHAR(t2.dt2,'DD-MON-YY') dt2, t1.l_nm
from table1 t1,table2 t2,
select k.column_value.extract('/RHS/value/text()').getStringVal() as lki
from d_v dv
, table(xmlsequence(dv.xmltypecol.extract('//c/RHS')))k
) qds
where
t2.l_id = t1.l_id
and to_char(t1.l_id) not in qds.lkiSQL> SELECT *
2 FROM TABLE(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY);
Plan hash value: 2820226721
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 7611M| 907G| | 352M (1)|999:59:59 |
| 1 | HASH UNIQUE | | 7611M| 907G| 2155G| 352M (1)|999:59:59 |
|* 2 | HASH JOIN | | 9343M| 1113G| | 22M (2)| 76:31:45 |
| 3 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | table2 | 1088 | 17408 | | 7 (0)| 00:00:0
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 8468M| 883G| | 22M (1)| 76:15:57 |
| 5 | MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN | | 1037K| 108M| | 4040 (1)| 00:00:49 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | D_V | 1127 | 87906 | | 56 (0)| 00
| 7 | BUFFER SORT | | 921 | 29472 | | 3984 (1)| 00:00:48 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | table1 | 921 | 29472 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH| XMLSEQUENCEFROMXMLTYPE | | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access("t2"."L_ID"="t1"."L_ID")
9 - filter(TO_CHAR("t1"."L_ID")<>"XMLTYPE"."GETSTRINGVAL"("XMLTYPE"."EXTRACT"(VALUE(KOKB
alue/text()')))Message was edited by:
M@$$@cHu$eTt$ -
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME') with FROM clause query data block
Two block :
- Block A based on table
- Block B based on FROM clause query
In WHEN-NEW-RECORD-INSTANCE of block A, I perform a SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY('BLOCK_B','QUERY_DATA_SOURCE_NAME','(...)'); and then query block B (... depends on value taken by 'code' column in block A).
At runtime it works till 'code' does not change (query_data_source_name does not change) but when I navigate to a record having a different 'code', it got the folowing message :
41380 - Cannot set the blocks query data source.
Any idea or suggestion ?Hello all i m trying dynamically change query_data_source_name but its not working.
i did the followings
Forms(10g2) block level:Query_data_source_type
Query_data_source_name:SELECT 1,2,3,4,5 FROM dual;
in control Block:
when_button_press my code is
GO_BLOCK('blk_query');
Clear_Block(No_Validate);
set_block_property('blk_query',query_data_source_name,
'SELECT col1,col2,col3,col4,col5 FROM mytable');
execute_query;
same result:unable to query error.
any one can help me regarding this issue. -
Master detail with from clause query
Hi!
I have 2 blocks: master and detail. The master block is based on a from clause query. Since I have to insert, update and delete on this block I have created the on-insert, on-update, on-delete and on-lock triggers (and the respective procedures).
In this block I have on-populate-details and pre-delete triggers created by the master-detail relation.
Now I have a problem!
Since I only want to commit to db when I click the "ok" button and I want to insert and delete records from these 2 blocks, when I insert records into the detail block (and master too), it forces me to save changes if I change the focus of the current record of de master block to another record within the same block.
How can I do this in order to insert records saving changes only when I click the button?
Thanks!
AnaI think that it is intended behaviour: when detail records are populated and there are uncommited changes so Forms asks if user wants to save changes.
-
FROM CLAUSE QUERY, how to construct?
Have always used the data block wizard so am probably missing something quiet simple. I have created a new form and am manually creating a simple test block. What i've done so far:
Block Properties
Database Data block: No
Enforce Primary Key: Yes
Query allowed: Yes
Query data source type: FROM clause query
Query data source name: select department_id, department_name from departments
Query data source columns: department_id (number), department_name (varchar2)
Created a canvas with and put two items, department_id (set as Primary key) and department_name on it.
When i run the form i get... FRM-41003 This function cannot be performed here.
What am i doing wrong and what steps should i be taking?
Gus
Oracle 10gfirst of all you should set the DATABASE DATA BLOCK property to YES, not NO.
it is a database block though not based on a TABLE, rather on a FROM CLAUSE QUERY, but it is a database block.
another thing, when you run the form, what function you are trying to perform when you get the error: "FRM-41003 This function cannot be performed here."
i guess you are trying to query the data. if its same, then that should be resolved once you set the DATABASE DATA BLOCK to YES.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to show date on "stand-by screen" on N71?
Is it possible to show date on on N71 "stand-by screen" like in the manual. Where can I change this setting?
-
Is there any known issue about mutex lock used in JNI on Solaris 10?
Dear Oracle, I'm facing a strange behavior when running a JNI application that use the mutex lock. The application hanged after running for a while on one of our Solaris 10 machines. After investigating the stack trace of the application, it shows th
-
PROBLEM WITH USER COMMAND AT SIMPLE REPORT
HII FRNDS MY PROBLEM IS WHEN I AM BRANCHING TO A LIST REPORT FROM MY ALV REPORT BY USING LEAVE TO LIST-PROCESSING . THEN IN MY LIST REPORT I AM HAVING 2 MORE CUSTOMIZED BUTTON . BUT THE THING IS THAT I AM NOT ABLE TO MAKE THAT BUTTON FUNCTION . CAN
-
Hi experts, I would like to add a new field (project group) to selection screen in CN41, anyone has an idea how to do it? Thanks in advance. Regards, Paul Smuda
-
I have this error pop up while almost done installing, "An error occurred during the installation of assemble 'Microsoft.VC80.CRT,type="win32",version="8.0.50727.4053",publicKeyToken="1fc8b 3b9a1e18e3b",processorArchitecture="amd64"". HRESULT: 0x8007