Query not returning result..kindly help..?

Query running forever..please help ?
Help on the same is appreciated.
Thanks

I moved your original thread to SQL & PL/SQL. This one being locked to avoid confusion in between.
Nicolas.

Similar Messages

  • IPTObjectManager.Query not returning correct result (Java)

    Hi,
    I am having a problem with the IPTObjectManager.Query method. The code is given below. The issue I am having is, that when I search for a community in a specific folder not results are returned. However if I search in all folders (using -1 as the second parameter to the method) it returns multiple communities including the one I need. Anyone else had the same issue with this??
    // THIS CODE WORKS AND RETURN MULTIPLE COMMUNITIES
    // THE hotelCode VARIABLE IS A STRING VARIABLE CONTAINING A VALUE
    // WHICH IS THE COMMUNITY NAME.
    // Create a ObjectManager object
    IPTObjectManager objectManager = session.GetObjectManagers(ObjectClass.Community.toInteger());
    // define the query based on the passed string
    Object[][] vQueryFilter = {
         new Object[]{new Integer(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME)},
         new Object[]{new Integer(PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_CONTAINS)},
         new Object[]{hotelCode}};
    // Run the query and return results
    IPTQueryResult ptQueryResult = objectManager.Query(
         PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, -1, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME, 0, -1, vQueryFilter);
    // THIS CODE DOES NOT WORK. I AM PASSING IS THE FOLDER ID OF THE
    // FOLDER WHICH CONTAINS THE COMMUNITY
    // Create a ObjectManager object
    IPTObjectManager objectManager = session.GetObjectManagers(ObjectClass.Community.toInteger());
    // define the query based on the passed string
    Object[][] vQueryFilter = {
         new Object[]{new Integer(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME)},
         new Object[]{new Integer(PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_CONTAINS)},
         new Object[]{hotelCode}};
    // Run the query and return results
    IPTQueryResult ptQueryResult = objectManager.Query(
         PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, 303, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME, 0, -1, vQueryFilter);

    I don't know about G6, however in version 5 there does not appear an easy way of doing it. I guess the "easiest" way would be to query sub-folders first, build and array of their ids, and then query for communities in those folders. This is using server API. Something like this (.NET):
    publicvoidGetFolderCommunities(intfolderId){    IPTAdminFolder folder =this.session.GetAdminCatalog().OpenAdminFolder(folderId, false);    IPTQueryResult qr =folder.QuerySubfolders(PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, [b]1, null, 0, -1, newobject[][] {             newobject[] { PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDER_FOLDERTYPE }, newobject[] { PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_EQ } , newobject[] { PT_ADMIN_FOLDER_TYPES.PT_ADMIN_FOLDER_TYPE_COMMUNITYFOLDER } } ); int[] folderIds =newint[qr.RowCount()]; Console.WriteLine("------ sub-folders for communities -------"); for(inti =0; i <qr.RowCount(); i++) {        intobjectId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_OBJECTID);        stringobjectName =qr.ItemAsString(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME);        intparentFolderId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDER_PARENTFOLDERID);        folderIds[i] =objectId; Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1}; parent: {2}", objectId, objectName, parentFolderId); } qr =this.session.GetCommunities().Query( PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_ALL, -1, (object) null, 0, -1, newobject[][] {            newobject[] { PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDERID }, newobject[] { PT_FILTEROPS.PT_FILTEROP_IN } , newobject[] { folderIds } } ); Console.WriteLine("------ communities from sub-folders -------"); for(inti =0; i <qr.RowCount(); i++) {        intobjectId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_OBJECTID);        stringobjectName =qr.ItemAsString(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_NAME);        int parentFolderId =qr.ItemAsInt(i, PT_PROPIDS.PT_PROPID_FOLDERID);        Console.WriteLine("{0}: {1}; folder: {2}", objectId, objectName, parentFolderId); }}
    Or you could use EDK RPC search. Again, in .NET:
    publicvoidSearchForCommunities(intfolderId){ IPortalSearchRequest searchRequest =this.ptSession.GetSearchFactory().CreatePortalSearchRequest(); searchRequest.SetObjectTypesToSearch(newObjectClass[] { ObjectClass.Community }); searchRequest.SetDocFoldersToSearch(newint[] {}, true); searchRequest.SetAdminFoldersToSearch(newint[] { folderId}, true); searchRequest.SetResultsCount(0, 100); searchRequest.SetResultsOrderBy(PortalField.OBJECT_ID); searchRequest.SetFieldsToReturn(newPlumtreeField[] {}); searchRequest.SetQuery("*"); ISearchResponse searchResponse =searchRequest.Execute(); intreturnedMatches =searchResponse.GetReturnedCount(); ISearchResultSet resultSet =searchResponse.GetResultSet(); IEnumerator enumerator =resultSet.GetResults(); while(enumerator.MoveNext()) { ISearchResult result =(ISearchResult) enumerator.Current; Console.WriteLine( result.GetFieldAsInt(PortalField.OBJECT_ID) +": "+ result.GetFieldAsString(PlumtreeField.NAME) ); }}
    Ruslan.

  • CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.

    Hi,
    We are facing a serious production issue. We've search the web extensively but to no avail.
    Problem:
    CQWP does not return result for a specific query when filtering on a managed metadata field.
    ULS log:
    The Uls logs provides 3 different messages that I could relate to every time the query is executed. The last item(level Medium) is displayed 14 times. For readability I've moved the ULS logs to the bottom of this question.
    Query:
    The query is as follows:
    (I've translated this from dutch so pardon any typo's)
    Query: (top selection) Display items from all sites in the site collection
    ListType: Documentlibrary
    Contenttype:
    Items from this group:Custom Document Contenttypes
    Items from this content type: Verklaring
    Filter: Soort is equal to X
    extra info: the field soort (Type) is a managed metadata field that was assigned the value X
    Managed Metadata Structure:
    -managed metadata service
      -Contoso
        -Enterprise Taxonomy (term set)
          -Document (term)
            -Verklaring (term)
              -Soort (term)
                -x (term)
    EXTRA INFO:
    When I modify the filter to filter on Title the CQWP DOES return the correct document!
    When I modify the query settings to search a specific library the CWQP also does return the correct document! (In this case I am filtering on a managed metadata field).
    QUESTION:
    Why doesn't the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over the entire site collection.
    Why does the CQWP return the document when filtering on a managed metadata field over a single library.
    (The type of information the CQWP should return (Soort:x) is stored in a dozen document libraries!)
    Here are the ULS logs.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Monitorable:
    CrossListQueryCache::GetSiteData() caught exception (Microsoft.SharePoint.SPException: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw. ---> System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x80004005): Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer
    het opnieuw.     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     --- Einde van intern uitzonderingsstackpad
    ---     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.HandleComException(COMException comEx)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery,
    ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery
    siteDataQuery, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)) for query:  '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef
    ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef
    Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef
    Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' at url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Warning
    Error occured while processing a Content Query Web Part. Performing the following query '<ViewFields><FieldRef ID="{fa564e0f-0c70-4ab9-b863-0177e6ddd247}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{94f89715-e097-4e8b-ba79-ea02aa8b7adb}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{1d22ea11-1e32-424e-89ab-9fedbadb6ce1}" Nullable="True" Type="Counter"/><FieldRef ID="{28cf69c5-fa48-462a-b5cd-27b6f9d2bd5f}" Nullable="True"
    Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{1df5e554-ec7e-46a6-901d-d85a3881cb18}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef ID="{d31655d1-1d5b-4511-95a1-7a09e9b75bf2}" Nullable="True" Type="User"/><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime"/><FieldRef ID="{30bb605f-5bae-48fe-b4e3-1f81d9772af9}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{ba3c27ee-4791-4867-8821-ff99000bac98}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{c5c4b81c-f1d9-4b43-a6a2-090df32ebb68}" Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{8fca95c0-9b7d-456f-8dae-b41ee2728b85}" Nullable="True"
    Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef ID="{39360f11-34cf-4356-9945-25c44e68dade}" Nullable="True" Type="Text"/><FieldRef ID="{543bc2cf-1f30-488e-8f25-6fe3b689d9ac}" Nullable="True" Type="Image"/><FieldRef
    ID="{43bdd51b-3c5b-4e78-90a8-fb2087f71e70}" Nullable="True" Type="Number"/><FieldRef ID="{9da97a8a-1da5-4a77-98d3-4bc10456e700}" Nullable="True" Type="Note"/><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}"
    Nullable="True" Type="Lookup"/><FieldRef Name="ScopeId" /><FieldRef Name="_Level" /><FieldRef Name="UniqueId" /><ListProperty Name="DraftVersionVisibility" /></ViewFields><Lists
    ServerTemplate="101"></Lists><Webs Scope="Recursive" /><RowLimit>45</RowLimit><Query><Where><And><BeginsWith><FieldRef Name="ContentTypeId" Nullable="True" Type="ContentTypeId"/><Value
    Type="ContentTypeId">0x010100C5FEE83B67FA6445B0C14AE8B7761BB8011E</Value></BeginsWith><In><FieldRef ID="{aea3cd20-8da0-4cb7-803b-5a33079a0e4d}" LookupId="TRUE"/><Values><Value Type="Counter">783</Value></Values></In></And></Where><OrderBy><FieldRef
    ID="{8c06beca-0777-48f7-91c7-6da68bc07b69}" Nullable="True" Type="DateTime" Ascending="FALSE"/></OrderBy></Query>' generated the following error: Kan deze actie niet voltooien.  Probeer het opnieuw.
    at the following url: /. Titel webonderdeel: Inhoudsquery
    Kan deze actie niet voltooien. Probeer het opnieuw. This is Dutch. It means something like: Cannot complete this action. Please try again.
    Product: Web Content Management
    Category Publishing
    Level: Medium (this message is displayed 14 times)
    ConsoleUtilies.GetContextualControlMode had no currentPage so the current SPWebPartManager mode cannot be retrieved.

    Hi,
    while digging through the logging (again) I found some extra logging regarding the same correlation id (see details below).
    We have a fairly large term store (4000+ lines).
    If somebody has a clue or tip that would greatly appreciated!
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa42 Monitorable A large block of literal text was sent to sql.  This can result in blocking in sql and excessive memory use on the front
    end.  Verify that no binary parameters are being passed as literals, and consider breaking up batches into smaller components.  If this request is for a SharePoint list or list item, you may be able to resolve this by reducing the number of fields. 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa43 High Slow Query Duration: 127.1515 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c
    03-19-2014 13:49:51.87 w3wp.exe (0x2098) 0x23BC SharePoint Foundation Database fa44 High Slow Query StackTrace-Managed:    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.OnPostExecuteCommand(SqlCommand command,
    SqlQueryData monitoringData)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteReader(SqlCommand command, CommandBehavior behavior, SqlQueryData monitoringData, Boolean retryForDeadLock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQueryInternal(Boolean
    retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPSqlClient.ExecuteQuery(Boolean retryfordeadlock)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequestInternalClass.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String
    bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Library.SPRequest.CrossListQuery(String bstrUrl, String bstrXmlWebs, String bstrXmlLists, String bstrXmlQuery, ISP2DSafeArrayWriter
    pCallback, Object& pvarColumns)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.SPWeb.GetSiteData(SPSiteDataQuery query)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetSiteData(SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery siteDataQuery, Boolean
    useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CachedArea.GetCrossListQueryResults(SPSiteDataQuery query, SPWeb currentContext, Boolean onlyPopulateCache, Boolean useSpQueryOnList, Int32 lcid)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea
    cachedArea, SPWeb web, SPSiteDataQuery query, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(CachedArea ca, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.CrossListQueryCache.GetSiteDataResults(SPSite
    site, String webUrl, Boolean useSpQueryOnList)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.IssueQuery()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.WebControls.ContentByQueryWebPart.GetXPathNavigator(String
    viewPath)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PrepareAndPerformTransform(Boolean bDeferExecuteTransform)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.PerformSelect()    
    bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.DataBind()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.EnsureDataBound()     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.CreateChildControls()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean
    includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)     bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest()    
    bij System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij ASP.BLANKWEBPARTPAGE_ASPX_1653093133.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context)     bij Microsoft.SharePoint.Publishing.TemplateRedirectionPage.ProcessRequest(HttpContext
    context)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)    
    bij System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception error)     bij System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb)     bij System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest
    wr, HttpContext context)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr
    managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32
    flags)     bij System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr managedHttpContext, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) 1971313a-6baa-49e9-bace-d024ce67f25c

  • Content scope document library does not return result for non farm administrator

    Hi
    I have a situation where I had to go with a unique permission applied subsite to store 1000 documents in the document library. This site has a set of 50 users. I was able to create content scope and library path for search. It returns results for me(creator/owner/administrator)
    however if I add other users as contributor or full permission, even after full crawling it does not return result for others.
    I saw some article that security broken site wont be indexed normal way and to include and I did that as well but no result for other users. I always get result.
    Please suggest if there are any specific security permissions that I need to include, so the document library target search will return result for others.
    Thanks
    Shri

    Hi Shri,
    For administrator search results, it looks like the documents could be crawled and searched.
    For other users you grant full control permission on subsite with unique permission where you store 1000 dcouments in document library, please make sure these 50 users have access permission(at least view permission) on documents from the
    library, then test again.
    Also test if users search on search center site without search scope, see if it's scope issue or search web part issue.
    If above doesn't work, please check ULS log for related useful information around the time when users search the documents, there should be more info to verify if issue is related to unique permision.
    Thanks,
    Daniel Yang
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Not getting Result please Help

    Hi All
    query_string VARCHAR2(2000);
    query_string are EMPNO,ENAME
    for rec1 in (SELECT query_string FROM p_table_name ) loop
    utl_file.put_line(v_file, rec1.result1);
    END LOOP;
    not getting Result please Help
    Regards

    You may look at this:
    michaels>  DECLARE
       cur            sys_refcursor;
       query_string   VARCHAR2 (2000) := '';
       p_table_name   VARCHAR2 (30)   := UPPER ('emp');
       p_stmt         LONG;
    BEGIN
       FOR c IN (SELECT ROWNUM rn, column_name, COUNT (*) OVER () cnt
                   FROM user_tab_cols
                  WHERE table_name = p_table_name AND hidden_column = 'NO')
       LOOP
          query_string :=
             query_string || c.column_name
             || CASE
                WHEN c.rn != c.cnt
                   THEN ' || ''|'' || '
             END;
       END LOOP;
       p_stmt := 'select ' || query_string || ' FROM ' || p_table_name;
    -- DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (p_stmt);
       OPEN cur FOR p_stmt;
       FOR rec1 IN (SELECT EXTRACTVALUE (t.COLUMN_VALUE, '/ROW//text()') result1
                      FROM TABLE (XMLSEQUENCE (cur)) t)
       LOOP
          /*  replace with utl_file in case ... */
          DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line (rec1.result1);
       END LOOP;
       CLOSE cur;
    END;
    7369|SMITH|CLERK|7902|17-DEC-80|800||20
    7499|ALLEN|SALESMAN|7698|20-FEB-81|1600|300|30
    7521|WARD|SALESMAN|7698|22-FEB-81|1250|500|30
    7566|JONES|MANAGER|7839|02-APR-81|2975||20
    7654|MARTIN|SALESMAN|7698|28-SEP-81|1250|1400|30
    7698|BLAKE|MANAGER|7839|01-MAY-81|2850||30
    7782|CLARK|MANAGER|7839|09-JUN-81|2450||10
    7788|SCOTT|ANALYST|7566|19-APR-87|3000||20
    7839|KING|PRESIDENT||17-NOV-81|5000||10
    7844|TURNER|SALESMAN|7698|08-SEP-81|1500|0|30
    7876|ADAMS|CLERK|7788|23-MAY-87|1100||20
    7900|JAMES|CLERK|7698|03-DEC-81|950||30
    7902|FORD|ANALYST|7566|03-DEC-81|3000||20
    7934|MILLER|CLERK|7782|23-JAN-82|1300||10
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

  • Find an item not returning results in SharePoint calendar list

    Environment: SharePoint 2013 upgraded to SP1. We have 1000s of team sites that have been upgraded from 2010 to 2013. In the lists in these sites, quite often I encounter that
    Find an item does not return results for certain fields other than the title field. For example, we have a calendar list which has a Single Line of Text field. I can not get meaningful results searching on
    this field.  I have tried this, no luck:
    http://www.enjoysharepoint.com/Articles/Details/sharepoint-2013-find-an-item-search-box-does-not-return-20956.aspx
    Search service crawls incremental every hour. I hope this does not need a full crawl.
    Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

    Thanks Ganesh. All these settings are as you recommended it to be. Nonetheless I double checked and here are the results:
    Ensure in the Search Service Application that the Web Application is included in the Content Source under SharePoint Start Addresses.
    Yes. Please remember we are getting search results. To be specific we are not getting Find items in the list to be returning accurate results.
    Make sure that the address in Alternate access mappings default text box is same as the start crawl address in the search service application.
    Yes.
    List Setting - Allow items from this list to appear in search results? yes
    Ensured
    set “Require content approval for submitted item?” to “No”.
    It is set to "No". However, will it not work for approved contents also?
    Thanks, Soumya | MCITP, SharePoint 2010

  • 'People Search Core Result' web part with 'office' filter in Keyword Query is not returning results

    I have created a page with "People search core result" web part on SharePoint 2010.
    When I try to use the setting (A) or (C) as shown below, there is no results been returned but when set to setting (B), there are results been returned.
    In the returned results I can see the OfficeNumber field is been populated with values and some of them is "UK Finance".
    Setting (A)
    Result Query Options
    -- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople -- Append Text To Query = Department:"Finance" AND OfficeNumber:"UK Finance"
    Setting (B)
    Result Query Options
    --- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople --- Append Text To Query = Department:"Finance"
    Setting (C)
    Result Query Options
    --- Fixed Keyword Query = contentclass:spspeople --- Append Text To Query = OfficeNumber:"UK Finance"
    What am I doing wrong here? Am I missing something? Do I need any additional configuration in order to get this to work?
    I hope someone could help me or point me to the right direction.
    Thank you
    muges

    You might want to check the Manage User Properties area of the User Profile Service in Central Admin.
    Any properties you query on should be marked "Indexed" or "Use in Scopes".  You can also check that you are using the correct internal name for these properties.

  • Basic NOT EXISTS query not returning any results

    DB Version: 10gR2
    One of our tables in the test schema is having less number of columns than the PROD shema.
    To determine which are missing columns in this table in Test schema i did the following.
    -----In Test Schema
    CREATE TABLE XYZ2
    (COL1 NUMBER);        ----------only one column
    SQL > CREATE TABLE tables_test_list AS SELECT TABLE_NAME,COLUMN_NAME FROM USER_TAB_COLS;
    Table created.--- In the prod schema
    SQL> CREATE TABLE XYZ2
      2  (COL1 NUMBER,
      3  COL2 NUMBER       ----------- same table name with an extra column
      4  );
    Table createdAnd from the PROD schema i execute the following SQL to determine what are the columns that are missing in the TEST schema
    select column_name from User_Tab_Cols  outer
    where table_name='XYZ2'
    and not exists (select 1 from TEST_SCHEMA.tables_test_list inner where outer.TABLE_NAME=inner.TABLE_NAME )But the above query is not returning any results. Any idea why?

    Actually, the example from the link I posted earlier:
    [email protected]> (
      2  select 'IN T1, NOT T2', column_name,data_type,data_length
      3    from user_tab_columns
      4   where table_name = 'T1'
      5  MINUS
      6  select 'IN T1, NOT T2', column_name,data_type,data_length
      7    from user_tab_columns
      8   where table_name = 'T2'
      9  )
    10  UNION ALL
    11  (
    12  select 'IN T2, NOT T1', column_name,data_type,data_length
    13    from user_tab_columns
    14   where table_name = 'T2'
    15  MINUS
    16  select 'IN T2, NOT T1', column_name,data_type,data_length
    17    from user_tab_columns
    18   where table_name = 'T1'
    19  )
    20  /

  • Query not returning rows (nvl)

    Hi all, I was wondering if anyone could help
    I have a query :
    select a, b, c, d, e from table_t
    where a=nvl(:para, a)
    and b=nvl(:parb,b)
    and c=nvl(:parc,c)
    the problem is is one the rows contain a null, then that row is not returned. I would like to return all rows along with the null values.
    for example:
    row 1 has b= null then row 1 is not displayed but only the rest of the rows where b is not null are displayed
    DB version 11.1.0.6.0 g
    All help will be appreciated.
    Kind regards,
    Cleopatra

    Hi, Cleo,
    Cleopatra wrote:
    Hi Frank ,
    thanks for the reply
    I get all the rows displayed now, but the filters do not seem to work for para, parb and parc.
    Any ideas how I could get that?Before moving on to other ideas, let's try the ideas I already mentioned:
    Frank Kulash wrote:
    ... post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only) for all tables involved, and also post the results you want from that data. Make sure the data shows special situations you care about, for example, if a is NULL, but :para is not NULL.
    Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
    In problems like this, it often helps to know if there are impossible values for any of the columns. For example, if a is a DATE, it could be helpful to know if all dates stored in the table are after the year 1000, or, if b is a NUMBER, that it is always in the range -100 to +100.
    Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0).
    See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002}If the problem includes parameters (such as :para and :parb), then post a few sets of parameters and the results you want from the same sample data for each set.
    Simplify the problem if you can. For example, instead of comparing 3 columns to 3 paramaeters, could you illustrate the problem just as well with 2 columns and 2 parameters, or even 1 column and 1 parameter?

  • Fuzzy search not returning results?

    I'm executing a phonetic search on the nm_resource column. my application allows a call center employee to search on the resource name (nm_resource), if the resource is not found then they will enter a new one. The problem is someone may have already entered the resource name but spelled it incorrectly resulting in duplicate records for the same resource name. To enable the call center to retrieve records that may have the same sound but are spelled differently we have implemented the fuzzy search capability of Oracle text. Things have been going very nicely for the most part with the exception of this one issue we're trying to understand.
    Using the query below we're searching for the resource name "rosies" the actual record in the database was entered as "rosy's". the search returns (rosies,rosie's,rosys) and does not return ---> rosy's <--- the record i'm interested in
    it is reasonable to expect rosy's to be returned in the result set? my query should retunn the max fuzzy expansions and all fuzzy scores.
    select score(1), nm_resource, ADDR_RSRC_ST_LN_1, id_resource, ADDR_RSRC_CITY FROM caps_resource where
    CONTAINS (nm_resource,'fuzzy(rosies, 0, 5000, weight)',1)>0
    union
    select /*+index(caps_resource ind_caps_resource_8)*/ 10, nm_resource, ADDR_RSRC_ST_LN_1, id_resource, ADDR_RSRC_CITY from caps_resource 
    where NM_RESOURCE_UPPER like upper(replace(replace('%' || 'rosies' || '%',' '), '-'))
    and rownum<500 order by 1 DESC;
    any help explaining this is much appriciated.
    Regards,

    When you index "Rosy's", by default it sees the apostropohe as a delimiter and tokenizes and indexes "Rosy" and "s" separately. So, you could only find it by searching the singular form or the singular form obtained by using stemming. However, if you set the apostrophoe as a skipjoin, then it tokenizes and indexes "Rosys" as one token that you can then search for that using "rosies":. Please see the demonstration below. You might also be interested in soundex, which can be used with Oracle Text, or the functions in the utl_match package or metaphone.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE TABLE caps_resource
      2    (nm_resource  VARCHAR2 (30))
      3  /
    Table created.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> INSERT ALL
      2  INTO caps_resource VALUES ('Rosy''s')
      3  SELECT * FROM DUAL
      4  /
    1 row created.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
      2  /
    NM_RESOURCE
    Rosy's
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX your_text_idx ON caps_resource (nm_resource)
      2  INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
      3  PARAMETERS
      4       ('STOPLIST CTXSYS.EMPTY_STOPLIST')
      5  /
    Index created.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT token_text FROM dr$your_text_idx$i
      2  /
    TOKEN_TEXT
    ROSY
    S
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
      2  WHERE  CONTAINS (nm_resource, 'FUZZY (rosies, 0, 5000, weight)') > 0
      3  /
    no rows selected
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> DROP INDEX your_text_idx
      2  /
    Index dropped.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> BEGIN
      2    CTX_DDL.CREATE_PREFERENCE ('your_lexer', 'BASIC_LEXER');
      3    CTX_DDL.SET_ATTRIBUTE ('your_lexer', 'SKIPJOINS', '''');
      4  END;
      5  /
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> CREATE INDEX your_text_idx ON caps_resource (nm_resource)
      2  INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
      3  PARAMETERS
      4    ('STOPLIST CTXSYS.EMPTY_STOPLIST
      5        LEXER       your_lexer')
      6  /
    Index created.
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT token_text FROM dr$your_text_idx$i
      2  /
    TOKEN_TEXT
    ROSYS
    SCOTT@orcl_11g> SELECT * FROM caps_resource
      2  WHERE  CONTAINS (nm_resource, 'FUZZY (rosies, 0, 5000, weight)') > 0
      3  /
    NM_RESOURCE
    Rosy's
    SCOTT@orcl_11g>

  • 8i Query not returning expected records

    Using Oracle 8i (8.1.7), a basic spatial query is not returning all the expected results. Table1 contains a variety of polygons; table2 is simply a set of rectangles. I want to return all objects from table1 that intersect a particular rectangle. The query below mostly works, but misses out some objects. On my system, 38 objects are returned where about 41 are expected; on the client system (which does not have identical data) the problem appears to be much worse, with hardly any objects being returned. The missing objects are clearly visible on the map, surrounded on all sides by objects which have been selected correctly. Help?
    Select t1.id from table1 t1, table2 t2
    where t1.IsCurrent = -1
    and (sdo_relate(t1.geoloc, t2.geoloc, 'mask=ANYINTERACT querytype=WINDOW') = 'TRUE')
    AND (t2.ID in ('001'));

    Hi,
    When the non-spatial predicate is dropped, you mentioned the
    objects are not missing. This means the spatial index (which will
    surely be used in this case) should be returning correct results.
    But it is possible the index is not used when other predicates are
    specified. Please look at the "execution plan" in both cases (when the
    objects are missing/not missing).
    Rewrite the query as:
    select /*+ ORDERED INDEX(t1 <spatial_index_name>) */ t1.id from t2, t1
    This should ensure a spatial-index-based evaluation.
    Let us know the execution plans and the behavior in either case.
    Btw, one thing to check is your tolerance values in
    user_sdo_geom_metadata.
    - Ravi.

  • Windows 8.1 x64 Smart Search Outlook and OneNote 2013(x32) not returning results

    Is the 8.1 Smart Search([windows-key]-type)  supposed to return results from Outlook and/or OneNote?
    I am using Exchange Cached mode for Outlook if that matters.
    I have done the following to try and get results to show up:
    control panel...Indexing Options...Advanced...File Types...Index Properties and File Contents
    used indexing troubleshooter which found no problems
    control panel...Indexing Options...Advanced...Rebuild...
    used scanpst to scan my ost and make repairs.
    checked and unchecked Outlook and OneNote within index properties
    tried to go to C:\Users\[username]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Outlook\username.ost properties...advanced...checked allow this file to have contents indexed. Except the next time i start outlook the check mark goes away.
    verified .pst , .ost and .pst files are all in the index service...file types... list
    Search within Outlook itself works just fine and quickly, but i would like to be able to search from the "Smart Search".  File name search is flawless. 
    If it isn't supported, why is it in the indexing options that clearly work for smart search settings because I also added a location for searching where file names search works just fine(although it does seem the contents of excel/word files are
    not being indexed, but the index might still be rebuilding)
    Any help would keep some hair on my head. 
    Thanks

    Hi,
    It seems that the smart search can't search the content in outlook and OneNote.
    blogs.technet.com/b/daanish/archive/2014/03/19/windows-8-101-smart-search.aspx
    The reason why Outlook and OneNote appears in the Index option tab is that Outlook and OneNote need the Windows search to help index the content in Outlook and OneNote, if we remote the outlook and onenote from Index Option tab, the search function in the
    Outlook and OneNote may not works.
    Also, smart search main focus on Settings , files, web Images, web Videos which we can select above the search box.  Another reason we suspect the design for this is the consideration for security, if we can search the emails in the smart search, that
    maybe some programs can access the content in Outlook and OneNote without authentication .
    Hope the information above help.
    Best Regards,
    Jason Zeng

  • Reports are not returning results in obiee 11g dashboards.

    Hi,
    I have dashboard with 3 reports,i saved my customization of particular date range,product group and target list.When I ran the dashboard for first time,I got all the results for 3 reports in dashboard but from the second time,only one of the reports returned results but other reports are just hanging up.I tried to clear cache in both BI server and presentation services but no use.
    Please help me what steps needs to be done so that all my saved reports return data.

    963277 wrote:
    Hi,
    I have dashboard with 3 reports,i saved my customization of particular date range,product group and target list.When I ran the dashboard for first time,I got all the results for 3 reports in dashboard but from the second time,only one of the reports returned results but other reports are just hanging up.I tried to clear cache in both BI server and presentation services but no use.
    Please help me what steps needs to be done so that all my saved reports return data.Do you know if anything has changed in the database or the RPD from the first time you ran those reports? Did you try running the physical query of the reports against the database to see if you are able to return results quickly?

  • Simple RFC call not returning results

    Hi,
    I have created a VERY simple Dynpro project to return the results of a simple RFC.  I've created the JCO connections and they test fine but the RFC doesn't return results to my application.
    Steps:
    1. create the project
    2. import the RFC Adaptive Model specifying the JCO connections
    3. Create an application
    4. Add the rfc model to the "Models Used"
    5. Bind the model to the component
    6. Context map two variables to the view (one input and one output)
    7. Create the method on the component
    8. Bound the UI elements to the model
    9. Set up the JCO connections from http://portal:50000/webdynpro/welcome
    For the JCO Connection creation, I used "Application" type through a load balanced connection for the Model Data connection (WD_MODELDATA_DEST) and the "Dictionary" type for the Metadata connection (WD_RFC_METADATA_DEST).
    Code:
    1. In the wdDoInit() of the controller
    wdContext.nodeZ_Hr_Get_Perno_Input().bind(new Z_Hr_Get_Perno_Input());
    2. In the wdDoInit() of the view
    wdContext.currentContextElement():setLogin_id( "mylogon" );
    wdThis.wdGetRfcTestComponentController().executeZ_Hr_Get_Perno_Input();
    My gut tells me it's an issue with my JCO connections but I can't be sure.
    I'm using Developer Studio SP9 with Patch 1 connecting to EP6 SP9 Patch 6.  When I start the Dev Studio, however, it displays version 2.0.9, is this the same for everyone?
    I've tested the function module from SE37 and it definitely returns a value. Also, if I don't set the login_id in the wdDoInit() before executing, it gives me the error that the input variable has not been set. So, this tells me that it connected to R3 to know that the variable was not passed but it still doesn't return any value when the variable is passed.
    Any ideas??  HELP!!!!!!!!!!
    Thanks,
    Andrew

    Okay, I'm not going crazy.  The issue was with my "simple" rfc.  When I changed the input and output to char(), it returned as expected.  I just have to figure out why the Dictionary types from R3 caused an issue.
    Andrew

  • Query not returning any rows?

    hi experts,
    My query running long but not returning any result. i have data , no locks on the tables.
    i have bigger ( hardware ) database on different server , where I can get results with same query.
    Can you tell me what are the DB settings i have to look at to resolve this issue?
    ( any sql query that can monitor these parameters ?)
    (the tabels involved in this query has 33milliions, 2millions, 7 milllions )
    Thanks ..
    Edited by: 642877 on Sep 21, 2011 6:46 PM

    Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
    PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    "CORE     11.2.0.2.0     Production"
    TNS for Solaris: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
    ==========================================================
    Plan hash value: 3185710999
    | Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
    | 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 3 | 423 | 24592 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
    | 1 | HASH GROUP BY | | 3 | 423 | 24592 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
    | 2 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | | | | |
    | 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 423 | 24591 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
    | 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 3 | 345 | 24585 (2)| 00:05:45 | | |
    | 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 84 | 21916 (2)| 00:05:07 | | |
    | 6 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 67 | 21915 (2)| 00:05:07 | | |
    | 7 | PARTITION LIST ALL | | 2 | 60 | 21913 (2)| 00:05:07 | 1 | 11 |
    |* 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ART_CRDT_ACCT_FACT | 2 | 60 | 21913 (2)| 00:05:07 | 1 | 11 |
    |* 9 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ART_PRTFOL_GRP_DIM | 1 | 37 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 10 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | ART_PRTFOL_GRP_DIM_INDEX1 | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 11 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | W_MONTH_D | 1 | 17 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    |* 12 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | UQ_W_MONTH_D | 1 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 13 | PARTITION LIST ITERATOR | | 3 | 93 | 2669 (2)| 00:00:38 | KEY | KEY |
    |* 14 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ACCT_CLTRL_RLTNP | 3 | 93 | 2669 (2)| 00:00:38 | KEY | KEY |
    |* 15 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | UQ_ART_CLTRL_DIM | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    | 16 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | CLTRL_DIM | 1 | 26 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | |
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Maybe you are looking for