Query of technical close pm order

Hi experts
when technical close pm order,system will prompt a window and ask me if I want to close the
notification, I found the indicator "complete notification' is flged defaultly. I want know if we can
make that indicator not flaged defaultly by some configuration?
thanks in advance!

Hi Mark
Normally is tick is very useful in industries. Thats why in default you cannot change it.
Notification is created by the production department and the order is created my maintenance department. while closing the order, u have to close the notification to make the cycle complete.
Even though it is the intimation to the production department , that the work is completed...
In SAP some things we should not remove or edit...
But , if u can tel us.. why u need to remove it in default ?
- Pithan

Similar Messages

Short Close Sales Orders

Hi All,
I have a sales order for say 1000 qty and i have delivered 900 qty. There are no further deliveries going to be posted against these Order. Now I want to close this Order. Usually I go to Sales Order---- Item details--Schedule Lines--change the order qty equal to Confirmed qty. This way the order gets closed and does not come in Open Sales Order report.
Now I have many such sales orders where i have posted deliveries and no further deliveries are to be posted.
How do I close these Sales Orders in Mass.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
SSK

Dear Sarvesh,
The solution is provided by Mr.Lakshmipathi..
I think we can make the order qty as 900 in va02, and then also it has the same effect as 'CLOSED'.
Please check that too.
Thanks & Regards,
Hegal K Charles

Unable to close the order

I am unable to close the order ...system hown this error messgae please any one guide me in this issue
Unprocessed future change recs for order 1002655 prevent del. flag/completion
Message no. CO688
Diagnosis
There are still future change records or error records to be processed from the confirmation for the confirmation processes in order 1002655. Possible confirmation processes are:
Automatic goods receipt
Backflushing
Calculation of actual costs
Data transfer to HR
System Response
You are not meant to set the deletion flag/'completed' status for orders with future change records that have not been processed.
Procedure
You should process the open future change records using
Predefined confimration process or
The CORUPROC program, by dispatching it in Customizing in a background job (dispatch background jobs: dispatching processes).
Check if incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost calculations exist for the order, and reprocess these if necessary:
Reprocessing incorrect goods movements
Reprocessing incorrect actual cost calculations
Regards
GSD

Sesidhar gollu,
Well try to reprocess your order by using T-code COFC which will reprocess the future records. Try this and then ping me any questions if u have.
Regards,
Madhu.G

Select query gives result in abc order instead of creation order

Hi,
I used the following command in sql command window to insert some rows to my table:
SQL>
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (1 , 'Zafon');
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (2 , 'Hasharon');
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (3 , 'Merkaz');
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (4 , 'Jerusalem');
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (5 , 'Hashfela');
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into regions (Region_ID, Region_Name) values (6 , 'Darom');
1 row insertedWhen I use select * query to see the table, I get the content in abc order:
SQL> SELECT * FROM REGIONS;
REGION_ID REGION_NAME
        6 Darom
        2 Hasharon
        5 Hashfela
        4 Jerusalem
        3 Merkaz
        1 Zafon
6 rows selectedHow can I get the result in the creation order (first created- first shown)?
Thanks

>
How can I get the result in the creation order (first created- first shown)?
>
You can't - not unless you use a solution that you should NEVER use unless absolutely necessary.
WHY do you need to do this? You never provide a reason.
To get a result in creation order there are two requirements:
1. Use an ORDER BY when you query the table - this is the only requirement others have mentioned
2. Control and specify the creation order when you INSERT the data
Unfortunately there is only ONE way that I am aware of to implement #2 above (i.e. to control the insertion order) and that is to SERIALIZE the insertion of rows into the table. That means that only ONE user can insert rows into the table at a time perhaps by using a stored procedure to perform the insert.
In a multi-user system a USER can NOT see uncommitted data of other users. If a user uses a trigger and a SEQUENCE generator to generate ascending numbers another user can use that same trigger and sequence to generate numbers also. If the first user performs an INSERT and gets number 37 but doesn't commit a second user can perform an INSERT, get number 38 and COMMIT before the first user commits.
That means that the row with 38 was created (committed) first but has a higher sequence than the row with 37.
The best you can do is use a sequence generator to generate unique ascending numbers. Then you can query the data using an ORDER BY on the column that contains the sequence value. But, as shown above, that doesn't guarantee that the rows were actually committed in that order.
That may sound like a trivial distinction but it has a very important implication. It means that you can NOT use that sequenced column to extract data reliably for batch-type processing. For the above example supposed your batch process extracted data for values from 1 to 38 and then that first user did a COMMIT.
The next extract would be for values from 39 to 50 (or some other value) and the row with 37 would never be extracted. For the same reasons you can't use a CREATION_DATE value for such extract purposes either since you would have the same issue.

Query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting

I'm getting the following error when I try to include "ORDER BY" in my sql statement :
"Your query can't include an "ORDER BY" clause when having column heading sorting enabled"
I have used other sql statements with "ORDER BY" but this is the first time I have come across this and I don't understand why it's going wrong. Does anyone have a suggestion as to how I could fix it? Here is one of the sql statements which I have tried which is giving me the error:
select "ID_NUMBER",
"PROJECT_NAME",
"PROJECT_TYPE",
"OWNER",
"PRIORITY",
"STATUS",
"END_DATE",
"COMMENTS"
from "PROJECT"
WHERE "STATUS" != 'Completed' AND "STATUS" != 'Cancelled'
ORDER BY "END_DATE"
Regards,
Ed.

You must deselect column heading sorting that is in the page "Report Attributes" .This is a check box placed on the same line of the element of the report.
bye

Close Sale Orders via DTW

Hi,
I want to close Sales Orders using DTW but I got an error:
Document rows Cannot be closed concurrently.
I read some threads:
Link: [Document rows Cannot be closed concurrently - Purchase Orders;
Link: [How to close a row in a Sales Order?;
Link: [Closing Order rows;
Link: [Documents rows cannot be closed concurrently with the other document modify;
and many more but couldn't solve problem.
I work on 8.8 version and try to close Sale Order that has few rows. I can close line via UI ( right mouse button and choose close line) but when I try to do it via DTW I have an error.
I disabled all formatted searches and it didn't help.
Need help.
Reagrds
Szymon

Hi,
the problem now is not the error message. The problem is: what about the sales order which should be lost after we regenerate the program RSM13000?
We installed the following support packages:
1.     SPAM and SAINT      from 26 to 38
2.     SAP Basis:           From SAPKB62047 to SAPKB62068
3.     SAP_ABA:          SAPKA62047 to SAPKA62068
a.     And 2 CRT
4.     SAP_APPL          SAPKH47022 to SAPKH47033
5.     SAP_HR:          SAPKE47024 to SAPKE47099
6.     SAP_IPPE:          SAPKGPIA06 to SAPKGPIA28
7.     PI:               SAPKIPZI55 to SAPKIPZI59
8.     PI_Basis:          SAPKIPYI57 to SAPKIPYI59
9.     ST_PI:               SAPKITLQG7 to SAPKITLQG8
10.     EA_APPL:          SAPKGPAA06 to SAPKGPAA29
11.     EA_FINSERV:          SAPKGPFA06 to SAPKGPFA29
12.     EA_GL TRADE          SAPKGPGA06 to SAPKGPGA29
13.     EA_HR               SAPKGPHA10 to u2026u2026 SAPKGPHA99
14.     EA_PS               SAPKGPPA06 to SAPKGPPA29
15.     EA_RETAIL:          SAPKGPRA06 to SAPKGPRA29
Thanks in advance
Hanseatik

Finance cannot close production order due to some PO# error message

When user is trying to close production order(using tcode CO02) getting error "..Production order #: Purchse order still exists..".
I would like to know what is the reson for this error and how user can close this production order.
Appreciate your quick response.
Thanks,
Aritra

status of production order: TECO PRT CNF DLV PRC BASC BCRQ GMPS*.
Vijay actually basic problem is user is getting error "You cannot select assembly order 16600192 for deletion" when he is trying to delete one line item from sales order using tcode VA02...
-i said to close the production order
-but they said not able to close as they are getting error "purchase order still exists"
-said to close all purchase order
-they replied "We cannot close the open orders as some we are waiting for the materials to be arrived and some order are blanket orders. Why we don't have such problem all this while and now ? This is our common practise.
Is there any way of force closed for Finance since the SF material has been GR in 23/03/2006.We only need
to closed the order, that's all."
pls tell me what to do, can we close production order in such scenario?
thanks
Aritra

Cannot close Production Order due to cost

Hi experts,
I have a problem with a production order that I cannot close. I have confirmed the order, however instead of cancelling the confirmation, I used MIGO inorder to reverse the goods movement. In closing the order, I encountered an error due to the balance cost for production (labor, power, water, overhead). I cannot cancel the confirmation since it is returning an error which is a deficit in the quantity. This is maybe due to the reversals I have already made for the finished good and components using MIGO. I cannot already repost or cancel the goods movement since the period is already closed.
I really am hoping for your help regarding this so I may already close the order.
Many many thanks.
Sincerely,
Ria

Since periods are already closed in MM, it is not
possible to post into these periods any more. There're two workarounds.
1. If you can close the orders with the balance, change the indicator
   in the settlement profile from 'To be settled in full' to 'Can be
   settled' or 'Not for settlement' temporarily. After you close the
   orders, change it back immediately.
2. Settle the order in KO88 twice with the following parameters:
   1) Settlement period    04
      Fiscal year          2009
      Posting period       06
   2) Settlement period    05
      Fiscal year          2005
      Posting period       06
You can check whether there's cost for the order in table COEP.
For more information, please review attached note 140672.
I hope this will be useful,
best regards
Maria

SO created is Open or Close Sales Order

<b>Hi
I hav ot write a report for SD , In this for sales order I hav to check that - Is this Sales order is Open or Close order ,
Select-optoins are SALES ORDER , DATE , PLANT , St location .
if it is a close sales order , Then this report should pass a message to The MM consultant abt the stock ...
Regards ,
Narender .</b>

Hi,
Just to add, a sales order is open till such time all the line items are delivered completely with respect to the quantity ordered. This you can find in the VBUK ( Header status ) where the GBSTK field value is " C ".
Even if the goods are shipped or not, it does not influence the sales order completeness. Its only a delivery that happened or not influences the sales order status. Also you can take help from VA05 t.code which shows all the open sales orders by checking the " Open sales orders " button.
Hope it helps. Pl reward if useful.
Thanks & Regards
Sadhu Kishore

How to collectively close internal orders?

Hi,
Need your advise on how to collectively close internal orders. I'm trying to use tcode KOK4 but I can't seem to get the Close function in the function selection list. Appreciate your advise on the steps/tcodes to use to collectively process internal orders. Also, what is the proper order of closing internal orders? I need to run CO88 first before setting the internal order to status Close?
Thanks!

Hi,
There are some pre conditons for closing the order like the order balance should be zero, there should not be any purchase order open against the order etc. So, please run the settlment to close the order. If there is any Purchase order open, then that also should be closed.
Please check the status management configuration in SPRO>Controlling>Internal Orders, for getting the complete function in T.Code KOK4
Regards,
Rijo Paul

Query to get the particular order in dyn admin.

Query to get the particular order in dyn admin.

In dyn/admin, goto /atg/commerce/order/OrderRepository
do the following query under "Run XML Operation Tags on the Repository"
<print-item item-descriptor="order" id="<your order id>" />
hit enter.
This should display your order's information.
~Gurvinder

Prerequisites for transaction COHV to close settled orders automately

Dear friends,
     What are prerequisites for transaction COHV to close settled orders automately?
     I really want to know these prerequisites because I came accross a problem: After finacial dept. settles production orders, it is usually for them to close production orders by using Transction COHV. But, Last month, They closed several orders that should be closed this month by using COHV.
     Preliminary reason: I found that these orders' variances were 0 and the stutus was DLV because these orders are produced completely at beginning of this month. And, the time to close orders after settled is behind these activities. So, I have a question before. Is there any settings to restrict the period? I think restrict to the period can solve this problem.
best regards

Close the question. thanks.

Sqlserver query using Group by and Order by

SUM(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_quantity) as BILL_QUANTITY,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_to) as BILLABLE_TO,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_yn) as BILLABLE_YN,
AVG(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_rate) as BILL_RATE,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_cost_rate) as COST_RATE,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_cost_total) as COST_TYPE,
LISTAGG(BILL_DETAIL.objid, ',') WITHIN GROUP(ORDER BY BILL_DETAIL.objid) as ID_LIST
FROM table_x_gsa_bill_detail BILL_DETAIL
WHERE (1=1)
GROUP BY (DECODE(BILLABLE_YN, 1, 'Billable', 'Non-Billable') || ',' || BILLABLE_TO || ',' || DETAIL_CLASS || ',' || COST_TYPE || ',' || BILL_RATE)
ORDER BY DECODE(BILLABLE_YN, 1, 'Billable', 'Non-Billable') || ',' || BILLABLE_TO || ',' || DETAIL_CLASS ||
) dt WHERE rn BETWEEN 0 AND 1
Can any one pls help me using of Case Condition keyword instead of Decode in the above query ??? iam not able to convert above query for group by and order by..
Actually i need to do group by the aggragate values which i got the values from the fields of BILLABLE_YN,BILLABLE_TO,DETAIL_CLASS, COST_TYPE, BILL_RATE.
where as in oracle i can run above query using decode keyword where as in sqlserver iam not able to use BILLABLE_YN field alias of above query in group by .
i tried like by using following way but it is wrong because here iam not using aggragate values of fields in group by funtion please help me in converting query in sqlserver. GROUP BY (case BILLABLE_YN when 1 then 'Billable' when 0 then 'Non-Billable' else
'Non-Billable' End BILLABLE_YN + ',' + BILLABLE_TO + ',' + DETAIL_CLASS + ',' + COST_TYPE + ',' + BILL_RATE)
Krishna

CREATE TABLE DETAIL
([objid] int,[x_billable_to] varchar(19), [x_bill_quantity] int,
[x_billable_yn] int, [x_bill_rate] int, [COST_TYPE] varchar(19) )
INSERT INTO
DETAIL
([objid], [x_billable_to], [x_bill_quantity], [x_billable_yn], [x_bill_rate],[COST_TYPE])
VALUES
(1, 'Customer', 3, 1, 20,'Parking'),
(2, 'Customer', 1, 1, 25,'Toll'),
(3, 'Customer', 2, 1, 20,'Parking')
Pls convert following query for executing query in sqlserver ..for the column ID_List it should return data like 1,2,3
SELECT * FROM (SELECT 1 rn,
SUM(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_quantity) as BILL_QUANTITY,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_to) as BILLABLE_TO,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_yn) as BILLABLE_YN,
AVG(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_rate) as BILL_RATE,
LISTAGG(BILL_DETAIL.objid, ',') WITHIN GROUP(ORDER BY BILL_DETAIL.objid) as ID_LIST
FROM BILL_DETAIL
WHERE (1=1)
GROUP BY (DECODE(x_billable_yn, 1, 'Billable', 'Non-Billable') + ',' + x_billable_to + ',' + COST_TYPE + ',' + x_bill_rate)
ORDER BY DECODE(x_billable_yn, 1, 'Billable', 'Non-Billable') + ',' + x_billable_to + ',' + COST_TYPE + ',' + x_bill_rate
)dt
WHERE rn BETWEEN 0 AND 1
Krishna
sounds like this
SELECT *
FROM
SELECT 1 rn,
SUM(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_quantity) as BILL_QUANTITY,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_to) as BILLABLE_TO,
MIN(BILL_DETAIL.x_billable_yn) as BILLABLE_YN,
AVG(BILL_DETAIL.x_bill_rate) as BILL_RATE,
LEFT(bd1.ID_LIST,LEN(bd1.ID_LIST)-1) AS ID_Listing
FROM BILL_DETAIL bd
CROSS APPLY (
SELECT BILL_DETAIL.objid + ',' AS [text()]
FROM BILL_DETAIL
WHERE objid = bd.objid
FOR XML PATH('')
)bd1(ID_LIST)
WHERE (1=1)
GROUP BY (CASE WHEN x_billable_yn = 1 THEN 'Billable' ELSE 'Non-Billable'END + ',' + x_billable_to + ',' + COST_TYPE + ',' + x_bill_rate),
LEFT(bd1.ID_LIST,LEN(bd1.ID_LIST)-1)
ORDER BY (CASE WHEN x_billable_yn = 1 THEN 'Billable' ELSE 'Non-Billable'END + ',' + x_billable_to + ',' + COST_TYPE + ',' + x_bill_rate),
LEFT(bd1.ID_LIST,LEN(bd1.ID_LIST)-1)
)dt
WHERE rn BETWEEN 0 AND 1
Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue
Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue
Visakh
My Wiki User Page
My MSDN Page
My Personal Blog
My Facebook Page

Query for Alert on production order to be released

Dear all users and experts,
I need a query for getting an alert on production orders to be released (from planned status to release status) by whether reading the release date of production orders created from 'order recommendation window' or by reading the due date of production order and substract the lead time(days) of the item from its due date or by any means you know best.
Thanks and best regards,
Farhan Sufi

Hi Gordon and Joseph,
Thanks to both of you for giving me queries.
Gordon, I made 3 production orders for testing from MRP order recommendation window from which 2 production orders has release date of today 9th July, 2010 (due date 12th July monday) and the 3rd one has release date of after weekend i.e. 12th July 2010 (due date is 13th July). release dates are calculated by MRP acording to the items' lead time and due date.
Gordon, when I applied your query It gave me msg 'no data was found as a result of this selection criteria' Can you explain what your query will give me in result?
where as Joseph, when I applied your query on alert, it gave me all 3 production orders as an alert to be released. I was expecting it will give me alert for 2 production order for today as their release date in MRP is today(9th July, 2010) and the alert for 3rd production order should come on 12th July and not today.
what I understood your query is displaying all production orders which have status 'planned' regardless of their release date.is it?
Joseph can you edit this query in such a way that It should consider the release date (calculated from due date and lead time in MRP order recommendation window) and display only those production orders which should be released today and exclude those which have release date in future. so that I can get alert for only those production orders which should be released today.
I hope good response from both of you
Thanks and best regards,
Farhan

(Application) Automatically close manufacturing orders

Hello Esperts
I pose the following situation to be analyzed and included in future versions of SAP BO.
In companies that handle a high volume of manufacturing orders and how to make the consumption of materials and receipt of production is the production order option, but deproduccion bill, requires the user to manually have to close one by a manufacturing orders.
The application is a parameter that SAP incubated for the closing process orders en masse, that it meets the condition that the planned amount is equal to or lower than received.
This process automatically close the orders completed.
Please discuss this request to include the functionality of SAP, is highly requested by our clients.
Thanks
Liliana Villegas
Consulting SAP BusinessOne

Hi Janice,
I don't think you can to close a number of open purchase orders automatically. However, you may try by DTW to close them. Otherwise, you need to use SDK.
Thanks,
Gordon

Query of technical close pm order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for