Query performance based on condition value

Hi,
I have a simple query which is actually on a view dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust. Please see query bellow
select * from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust WHERE insertdatetime=(select max(insertdatetime)
from dwdb_dba.actl_partinfo_cust Where system_source='UTS') AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' and Custdevice in ('BT-M2789-C')This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds. Execution plan is same for both then why one query taking too much time and other returning so fast and how can i tune the query against the condition AND SUPPLIERID='CG1' so that it can also return within 3 seconds.
I actualy dont understand the behaviour
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 3622663398
| Id | Operation                       | Name                        | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                             |    10 | 42790 |   152K (6)| 00:00:59 |
|* 1 | VIEW                           | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          |    10 | 42790 | 59972   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|   2 |   UNION-ALL                     |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 3 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      |     9 | 3429 | 59968   (4)| 00:00:23 |
|* 4 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX3     |   420K|       | 1462 (11)| 00:00:01 |
|* 5 |    TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |   311 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 6 |     INDEX RANGE SCAN            | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|   7 |   SORT AGGREGATE                |                             |     1 |    14 |            |       |
|   8 |    VIEW                         | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST          | 1363K|    18M| 92040   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|   9 |     UNION-ALL                   |                             |       |       |            |       |
|* 10 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_UTS      | 1363K|    33M| 92036   (8)| 00:00:36 |
|* 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PART_CUST_UTS_IDX1     | 1481K|       | 5528 (10)| 00:00:03 |
|* 12 |      TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_PROMIS_4 |     1 |    15 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN          | ACTL_PARTINFO_CUST_4_IDX1   |     1 |       |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Thanks

Salman Qureshi wrote:
This query is taking very very long time to return (around 30 records) but if i u
Here if i change the condition "AND SUPPLIERID='CG1'" to "AND SUPPLIERID='DUMMY'", it returns within 3 seconds.
My developer has changed the code of the view which was involved and not it is working fine but still i m curious to know that what could be the reason of this. Same execution plan but only condition value is different. One value returns some rows but returns within few seconds and other condition also returns a few rows but may hours.Salman,
A bit more details would help diagnose the root cause.
If you are still interested in diagnosing the root cause, you may want to provide complete EXPLAIN PLAN output, along with predicate section. If you are on 10g, you may want to provide the output of DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_CURSOR which will show the actual plan used along with actual number of records generated by each step in the execution plan.
It is possible that SUPPLIERID column data is skewed so that there are less records in table for the value 'DUMMY' but much more number of records for the value 'CG1'. This predicate combined with the other predicate on CUSTDEVICE column may have been resulting in similar number of rows the final query returns.
It is possible that the predicate on CUSTDEVICE is being applied at different stage in the plan than the predicate on SUPPLIERID column.
Edited by: user503699 on Aug 3, 2010 3:11 PM

Similar Messages

Sub Query selection based on parameter value selected

I have a parameter, and based on the value selected, I want to run one of two queries. I thought I could do either an IF THEN ELSE, or a CASE, but neither seem to be working.
What I'm trying to do is this:
IF parameter_value = 338 THEN
(RUN THIS SELECT QUERY)
ELSE
(RUN THIS SELECT QUERY)
END IF
or
SELECT CASE WHEN parameter_value = 338 THEN (RUN THIS SELECT QUERY)
ELSE (RUN THIS SELECT QUERY)
END X
I'm getting errors with both. For the CASE statement, it says "too many values". For the IF statement, it just says "invalid SQL statement".
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks.

Looks like this is what you want
SQL> WITH T
2       AS (SELECT LEVEL col
3             FROM DUAL
4           CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 5)
5 SELECT *
6    FROM T;
       COL
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
SQL>
SQL> VARIABLE parameter_value    NUMBER
SQL> EXEC    :parameter_value := 338;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> WITH T
2       AS (SELECT LEVEL col
3             FROM DUAL
4           CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 5)
5 SELECT col
6    FROM T
7   WHERE col = DECODE (:parameter_value, 338, col, :parameter_value); --- If 338 then select all if not 338 select only the one with parameter_value.
       COL
         1
         2
         3
         4
         5
SQL>
SQL> EXEC :parameter_value := 2;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> WITH T
2       AS (SELECT LEVEL col
3             FROM DUAL
4           CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 5)
5 SELECT col
6    FROM T
7   WHERE col = DECODE (:parameter_value, 338, col, :parameter_value);
       COL
         2
SQL>
SQL> EXEC :parameter_value := 3;
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
SQL> WITH T
2       AS (SELECT LEVEL col
3             FROM DUAL
4           CONNECT BY LEVEL <= 5)
5 SELECT col
6    FROM T
7   WHERE col = DECODE (:parameter_value, 338, col, :parameter_value);
       COL
         3
SQL> You need to use following where clause in your query
WHERE column_name = DECODE (parameter_value, 338, col, parameter_value); -- replace the column_name with name of the column you are comparing against.G.
Edited by: G. on Mar 8, 2011 3:36 PM
formatted and added comments

Different execution plan for same query but for different condition value

Hi All,
I'm facing a strange situation where same query for different condition not working.
1--
Select top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
where feecode ='OW4'
2--
Select top 10 * from revenuefact(nolock)
where feecode ='BTE'
1st query is returning result easily but 2nd query is taking too long. Column
feecode has already Non-clustered index and Clustered index is also available for another col RevenueSID.
I was surprised when checked the query execution plan for both the above queries which is quite different (as per attached below). Can anyone suggest me the reason behind it.
And solution for the same. One more thing that data for feecode BTE is inserting through different source instead of others feecode and table contains more than 300 million rows.

When I speak with people inside Microsoft who work with the optimizer, the refuse to accept the work "bug" when a query produces the correct result, but with a suboptimal plan. They prefer to use the word "limitation".
The limitation here is that when the optimizer compares two plans, it only looks at the estimated cost. As far as I know, it does not perform any analysis from the perspective "what if the statistics are wrong"? They do provide the hint OPTIMIZE
FOR UNKNOWN, but that does not work then there is a constant as in this case.
The optimizer will surely distinguish between TOP 10 and TOP 10000000. With the latter, you have all reason to expect a Clustered Index Scan no matter which value you search for - unless you pick a value for which the histogram indicates that there are no
rows.
Interesting enough, I was able to reproduce the situation in my Northgale database, which is an inflated version of Northwind, and where statistics should be accurate.
SELECT TOP 10 * FROM Orders WHERE EmployeeID = 8
results in a CI scan, and so does also EmployeeID = 7, and even 5. There are only 2292 rows out of a total of 344305 rows. If I try EmployeeID 808 for which there are 1797, the optimizer goes for the index seek.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Querying Leads based on checkbox value

Hi I want to retrieve all the Leads based on my cpo_modified checkbox field.
I'm using this to do it:
objListOfLead = LeadHelper.createListOfLead(strLeadDim);
objListOfLead[0].cpo_modified = "Y";
//Campos de la entidad Lead a devolver
objListOfLead[0].Country = "";
objListOfLead[0].cpo_atInstallments = "";
objListOfLead[0].cpo_atProfit = "";
objListOfLead[0].cpo_atProfit_percent = "";
(and some more, all empty too)
objQryOutput = queryLeads(objListOfLead, mySession, false);
But I've been unable to get what I want. I'm getting allways the same error:
El campo 'ZBool_10' de la instancia del componente de integraci??n 'Lead' contiene una expresi??n de consulta no v??lida: 'Y'(SBL-EAI-13002)
Any of you knows how to filter a query based on a checkbox value? Should I use "Y"or "1" or "true" perhaps???....I've tried many times with different expressions but all of them has been unsuccesfull to me...some ideas?
Thank you very much!
Noël

Great Michael! The expression you suggested ='Y'" worked perfectly!
Thank you VERY MUCH!
But, why those kind of ¿tricks? are not well documented by Oracle? I've lost a great amount of time (been the first time I work over OnDemand) and that's a thing I really hate...
My most sincerely thanks Michael!
Noël

RE: Swapping two query views based on filter value

Hi Can anyone tell me how do I swap between two query views for a web item based on one filter selection.
Thanks in advance
Message was edited by:
Chandra Hasa Reddy Samala

Hi,
If you want to copy list item with Person column to another list, here are two solutions for your reference:
1.Use SharePoint Designer workflow to create item in another list when there is item added in the current list, there is a workflow action “Create List Item”
will meet your requirement. The string in Person column will still be a hyperlink in the other list and you can apply filter on it.
Workflow actions quick reference
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/jj164026(v=office.15).aspx
2.Use JavaScript Client Object Model to copy item to other list, you can put the script into a Content Editor Web Part.
JavaScript Client Object Model
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/hh185006(v=office.14).aspx
More information about
using JavaScript Client Object Model to retrieve and create/update list item:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/hh185007(v=office.14).aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/hh185011(v=office.14).aspx
Best regards
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

How to query the condition value in VPRS

Hello all,
we provide the sales price to customers based on the condition value in "VPRS" ,because I have thousands of goods need the price,so I 'd like to make a query to extract the condition value in "VPRS".
which table is refer to this?
https://mnlylq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1mXNdIiY7VgiU1v3ymS71pxZluGxj4YNp4IFsyQEr1zkoxjm1VCsxpOgbBQ1-ucxiRtA9tC7O_3ZPaQa7qWKGbdnHNX8UzazWTlettENIO7iujggSx7vHjc2bvuIqhYFYb2DEgIjuNaJ5foKU_xF7wvA/%E5%9B%BE%E5%85%AD.jpg?psid
Thanks,
helai

hi,
For your Item category, if you check DETERMINE COST
Determine cost
Indicates whether, during pricing, the system determines the cost (stock value) of a sales document item.
Use
The system checks the cost determination indicator as a requirement before applying the condition type that calculates the cost (condition type VPRS in the standard version of R/3 1.1)
Mainatin VPRS as D then it will automatically pull the price from Material master if maintained
IF VPRS is getting determined, then in your pricing procedure, you can add markup (multiplier)

Tax condition Value

Hi SAP Gurus,
In the sales order Tax Jur Code County is taking one value and invoice is taking different tax.
In the sales order Tax Jur Code County is calculating based on condition value and Tax Jur Code State.
However in the invoice it is not considering the Tax Jur Code State.
what could be the reason?
Please help.
Thanks in Advance

Dear drn rao
Go to VA02, input the sale order and execute. There select the line item and go to condition tab. You can see many condition types flowing over there. Block the condition type UTXJ and click on blue lens at the bottom left screen and see what tax code is flowing.
Similarly, go to VF02 and check what tax code is flowing. Post the outcome. Nevertheless, in normal circumstances, it should be the same tax code.
In fact, on your comments "sales order Tax Jur Code County is taking one value and invoice is taking different tax" you should check in VK11 / UTXJ
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

SQL Query (updateable report) Region - Conditionally Hide and Set Values

SQL Query (updateable report) Region - Conditionally Hide and Set Values
Outline of requirement :-
Master / Detail page with Detail updated on same page using SQL Query (updateable report).
The detail region has the following source
SELECT item_id,
       contract_id,
       CASE WHEN hardware_id IS NOT NULL THEN
               'HA'
            WHEN backup_dev_id IS NOT NULL THEN
               'BD'
            WHEN hardware_os_id IS NOT NULL THEN
               'HS'
       END item_type,
       hardware_id,
       backup_dev_id,
       hardware_os_id
FROM   "#OWNER#".support_items
WHERE contract_id = :P26_CONTRACT_IDThe table support_items implements arced relationships and has the following columns
CREATE TABLE SUPPORT_ITEMS
ITEM_ID         NUMBER                        NOT NULL,
CONTRACT_ID     NUMBER                        NOT NULL,
HARDWARE_ID     NUMBER,
BACKUP_DEV_ID   NUMBER,
HARDWARE_OS_ID NUMBER
)A check type constaint on support_items ensures that only one of the fk's is present.
      (    hardware_id    IS NOT NULL
       AND backup_dev_id IS NULL
       AND hardware_os_id IS NULL
OR    (    hardware_id    IS NULL
       AND backup_dev_id IS NOT NULL
       AND hardware_os_id IS NULL
OR    (    hardware_id    IS NULL
       AND backup_dev_id IS NULL
       AND hardware_os_id IS NOT NULL
      )    Hardware_Id is a FK to Hardware_Assets
Backup_dev_id is a FK to Backup_Devices
Hardware_os_id is a FK to Hardware_op_systems
The Tabular Form Element based on item_type column of SQL query is Displayed As Select List (based on LOV) referencing a named list of values which have the following properties
Display Value     Return Value
Hardware Asset    HA
Backup Device     BD
Computer System   HSThe Tabular Form Elements for the report attributes for hardware_id, backup_dev_id and hardware_os_id are all Displayed As Select List (Based on LOV).
What I want to do is only display the Select List for the FK depending on the value of the Select List on Item Type, e.g.
Item_Type is 'HA' then display Select List for hardware_id, do not display and set to NULL the Select Lists for backup_dev_id and hardware_os_id.
Item_Type is 'BB' then display Select List for backup_dev_id, do not display and set to NULL the Select Lists for hardware_id and hardware_os_id.
Item_Type is 'HS' then display Select List for hardware_os_id, do not display and set to NULL the Select Lists backup_dev_id and hardware_id.
There are properties on elements to conditionally display it but how do we reference the values of the SQL query Updateable region? they are not given a page item name?
Also on the Tabular For Elements there is an Edit tick against a report item - however when you go to the Column Attributes there is not a property with which you can control the Edit setting.
What's the best way of implementing this requirement in APEX 3.1?
Thanks.

>
Welcome to the forum: please read the FAQ and forum sticky threads (if you haven't done so already), and update your profile with a real handle instead of "user13515136".
When you have a problem you'll get a faster, more effective response by including as much relevant information as possible upfront. This should include:
<li>Full APEX version
<li>Full DB/version/edition/host OS
<li>Web server architecture (EPG, OHS or APEX listener/host OS)
<li>Browser(s) and version(s) used
<li>Theme
<li>Template(s)
<li>Region/item type(s) (making particular distinction as to whether a "report" is a standard report, an interactive report, or in fact an "updateable report" (i.e. a tabular form)
With APEX we're also fortunate to have a great resource in apex.oracle.com where we can reproduce and share problems. Reproducing things there is the best way to troubleshoot most issues, especially those relating to layout and visual formatting. If you expect a detailed answer then it's appropriate for you to take on a significant part of the effort by getting as far as possible with an example of the problem on apex.oracle.com before asking for assistance with specific issues, which we can then see at first hand.
I have a multi-row region that displays values and allows entries in a number of fields.Provide exact details of how this has been implemented. (An example on apex.oracle.com is always a good way to do this.)
I should like the fields to be conditional in that they do not permit entry, but still display, if certain conditions apply (e.g. older rows greyed out). Can this be done? Almost anything can be done, often in multiple ways. Which are appropriate may be dependent on a particular implementation, the skills available to implement it, and the effort you're willing to expend on it. Hence it's necessary to provide full details of what you've done so far...

Query Performance Issue based on the same Multiprovider

Hi All,
I am facing a performance issue with one of the BEx Query 1 based on a particular Multiprovider.
I have done all the kind of testing and came o a conclusion that the OLAP: Data Transfer time for the query is the max at around 820 Secs.
The surprising part is another Query 2 based on the same multiprovider runs absolutely fine without any hassles with OLAP : Data Transfer time with merely 3 Sec.
Another, surprise is that Query 2 has even more Restricted Key Figures and Calculated Key Figures but it runs smoothly.
Both the queries use cache memory.
Please suggest a solution to this.
Thanks.

Hi Rupesh,
There is no much difference between the 2 queries.
Query 1 - which has performance issue has the same filters as that of Query 2 - which is working fine.
The only difference is that the selection of Fiscal Week is in the Default Values Pane for Query 2 whereas its in Characteristics Restrictions in Query 1. I doubt whether this setting will have any effect on the performance.
Both restriction i.e Fiscal Week restriction is based on Customer exit and the rows include Hierarchy for both the queries.
I assume creating aggregates on hierarchy for the Cube can be a solution.

How do I change the query based on parameter value

hi,
Based on parameter value I want to change my query. If paramter value is 'O' i want the 'order by depno' in query if the value is null i don't want the order by clause.
How do I achieve this.
Thanks
Ram

U can use lexical parameter
i.e u create one user parameter and in query
u use this parameter with &param_name
ex.
select val,prize from stock where sr_no > :srno
orderby &ord_by
here ord_by is lexical parameter
and set its intial value to 'sr_no'
so u can get result order by sr_no
this parameter is set from form so u will give condition in form and depending
on condition u will pass this parameter from form.

Conditional Plan Task Based on Customer Value

Trigger Task in Plan that will route a service ticket to a different group based on Customer field
I have a hardware request form. I would like to route the task to a group based on the location of the customer. Our company has approx 147 distinct locations and the request for a hardware request will get routed to approx 20 different Tier 2 groups based on the customer's location.
First off, I am not using Request Center for service delivery. I am using a servicelink agent to route a ticket to HP Service Desk. I was planning on using the conditionals in the plan and create a 20 tasks for each Tier 2 group I need to route to. The conditionals would look like this:
Service.Data.Customer_Information.Location_Code = "ATLNTA1100" OR Service.Data.Customer_Information.Location_Code = "AUSTIN7600" OR Service.Data.Customer_Information.Location_Code = "BIRMIN3595"
The problem is that the conditional section only allows for up to 255 characters. There are 25+ locations that would route to one of the Tier 2 groups.
Can someone think of a different way I could route this?

We are doing something similar to Joshua. In our environment, every user has a location code tied to their HR record, which we pull in through a directory integration.
when ordering, there is a DDR on the form that looks up the location code in a SQL server table we have created. In that table, addition to the site logistics, like street, city, stat, country and zip, we also have columns for various performer roles that exist, like desktop support, blackberry support, phone support, desktop purchasing, etc. We pull that back into the form and then let the customer override and validate a different location if they need something for a different location.
We have about 2000 location codes in our system to support our 50,000 employees, many of which are just different parts of a floor or floors in a building. We set the performer roles to the queue name that gets the work(we are using Service manager for Fulfillment). so, we have one task, but it route to a performer based on an expression, which is the looked-up value for that support function.
that enables us to change routing or add locations via data changes in SQL rather than Catalog deploying a new version of a service or writing a massive client-side javascript. We've been using this for about 3 months and it works very well.

Performance operations based on Column values in SQL server 2008

Hi ,
I have a table which consist of following columns
ID    Formula
Values
DisplayValue
1
a*b/100       100*12/100
      null
2
b*c/100
12*4/100
null
I want to perform operation based on column "Values" and save data after operations in new column Name "Display Value" .i.e I want to get the below result . Can anyone please help.
ID    Formula
Values
DisplayValue
1
a*b/100       100*12/100
      12
2
b*c/100
12*4/100
0.48
Thanks for the help.
Regards, Priti A

Try this,
create table #mytable (ID int,Formula varchar(10), [Values] varchar(10), DisplayValue decimal(10,4))
insert into #mytable values(1 ,'a*b/100','100*12/100',null)
insert into #mytable values(2 ,'b*c/100','12*4/100',null)
declare @rowcount int=1
while @rowcount <= (select max(id) from #mytable)
begin
declare @expression nvarchar(max)
select @expression=[values] from #mytable where id = + @rowcount
declare @sql nvarchar(max)
set @sql = 'select @result = ' + @expression
declare @result decimal(10,4)
exec sp_executesql @sql, N'@result decimal(10,4) output', @result = @result out
update #mytable set DisplayValue= @result where id = @rowcount
set @rowcount=@rowcount+1
end
select * from #mytable
Regards, RSingh

Query on DSO, KF value +/- based on flag value in DSO

Hi Experts,
I have a query on DSO and it is running fine.
Current Query output :
CHAR1 | CHAR2 | KF1
1111       S            100
1111       H            100
I want to put + or - sign for KF based on value of CHAR 2 (Flag) in query output.
So
Desired Query output :
CHAR1 | CHAR2 | KF1
1111       S            -100
1111       H             100
I can Add CHAR3 in DSO and based on CHAR2 value CHAR3 will store +1 or -1. Add it can be used to get + or -Value of KF using CKF.
But without doing it (CHAR3), can I do it directly at query level ?
Regards,
Vinod

Try this:
RKF1: KF restricted on S
RKF2: KF restricted on H
CKF: (-1)*RKF1 + RKF2
This should give you what you are looking for.
Regards,
Gaurav

CAML Query to get specific item in folder based on dropdown value using Javascript client object model

Hi,
I am using the Javascript Client object model.
I have a custom list and a custom document library.
Custom list contains 2 columns - dlName , dlValue
The document library contains 2 folders - "folder1" , "folder2" and contains some images.
The image name starts with the "dlValue" available in the custom list
I am using a visual webpart and using javascript client object model.
I am trying to achieve the below functionality:
1) Load a dropdown with the custom list.
2) set the image based on the value in dropdown.
I have achieved the first option, I have set the dropdown, but not sure how to query the folder and set the image.
Below is the code i have used so far:
//In Visual webpart
<select id="ddlTest" >
</select>
<br/>
<div id="PreviewLayer">
<img id="imgPlaceHolder" runat="server" alt="Image" title="imgPlaceHolder" src=" " />
</div>
// In Javascript file
function RenderHtmlOnSuccess() {
var ddlTest = this.document.getElementById("ddlTest");
ddlTest.options.length = 0;
var enumerator = this.customListItems.getEnumerator();
while (enumerator.moveNext()) {
var currentItem = enumerator.get_current();
var dropdownValue = currentItem.get_item("dlValue");
ddlTest.options[ddlTest.options.length] = new Option(currentItem.get_item("dlName"), dropdownValue);
setImage(dropdownValue); // Not sure how to query the folder and set the image based on value.
// Also if dropdown value is changed, corresponding image should be shown
How to query the folder and based on dropdown value, show the image? Also, how to handle the dropdown value change?
Thanks

Hi,
Here are two links for your reference:
Example of how to Get Files from a Folder using Ecmascript \ Javascript client object model in SharePoint 2010
http://sharepointmantra.wordpress.com/2013/10/19/example-of-how-to-get-files-from-a-folder-using-ecmascript-javascript-client-object-model-in-sharepoint-2010/
SP2010 JSOM Client Object Model: How to get all documents in libraries including all folders recursively
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/70185/sp2010-jsom-client-object-model-how-to-get-all-documents-in-libraries-including
In SharePoint 2013, we can also use REST API to achieve it.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dn198245.aspx
Thanks,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

Needs Query to get the cycle time automatically based on the value provided in the UDF on OWOR table

Dear all,
Need a query to get the Cycle time in hr based on the value provide in the udf on OWOR table.
Details of UDF:-
1.Start date =10/07/14 (Field Name U_EA_REST)
2.Start time =10:00        (Field Name U_EA_REASTARTTIME)
3.End date =11/07/14    (Field Name U_EA_REET)
4.End Time=14:00          (Field Name U_EA_REAENDTIME
Cycle Time=_______      (Field Name U_EA_REACYCLETIME)
Regards,
BanugopanRajendran

Dear all,
Need a query to get the Cycle time in hr based on the value provide in the udf on OWOR table.
Details of UDF:-
1.Start date =10/07/14 (Field Name U_EA_REST)   - Date Type
2.Start time =10:00        (Field Name U_EA_REASTARTTIME) - Hour Type
3.End date =11/07/14    (Field Name U_EA_REET) - Date Type
4.End Time=14:00          (Field Name U_EA_REAENDTIME - Hour Type
Cycle Time=_______      (Field Name U_EA_REACYCLETIME) - Hour Type
Regards,
BanugopanRajendran

Query performance based on condition value

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for