Query with date in where clause

hi,
i have build a view with join conditions from 8 tables. the data from this view is more then 100,000
when i run the query with different clause its work with some seconds. but when i put date column in where cluase it sleeps.
eg..
where unit_id = 4 and t_id = 's09' and vb like '%amb%'
works fine.
where unit_id = 4 and t_id = 's09' and vb like '%amb%' and date between dt1 and dt2
now sleep
please ......give me some suggestions

hi i have done the explain plan
the result is
Operation Object
SELECT STATEMENT ()
NESTED LOOPS ()
NESTED LOOPS ()
HASH JOIN ()
HASH JOIN ()
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_PO_MST
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_SUPPLIER
TABLE ACCESS (FULL) PR_PO_DTL
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) INDENT_MST
INDEX (RANGE SCAN) ST_IND_MST_IDX
TABLE ACCESS (BY INDEX ROWID) ST_ITEM
Operation Object
INDEX (UNIQUE SCAN) PK_ST_ITEM
now wot do do????

Similar Messages

SQL QUERY How to write a sql query with a complex where clause.

I would like to get a list of all my invoices from the past year plus any open invoices that are more than a year old.
I don't want any overlapping rows.
Debra has a question

Debra,
Sorry but you have posted to a forum that deals exclusively with questions/issues about customizing and programming Microsoft Project, a planning and scheduling application. I suggest you delete this post and find a more appropriate forum.
John

Using Date in where clause

Hello all,
I am new to Oracle, currently using 10G + aspvbscript.
I've been trying to query data using date in where clause but nothing seems to work.
The column is in date format.
It gets printed out like this: 5/1/2010 11:21:19 AM
I tried using this query:
SELECT * from table where TRUNC(user_date) > to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS') order by user_date asc.
It does return an output but it returns everything in table and does not take WHERE clause into consideration however, it does sort the date in ascending order.
I've tried getting rid of TRUNC tried to format date in a different way but no such luck.
Please point me to the right direction.
Thanks.

Welcome to the forums!
In cases like this it is helpful if you can provide the following information:
1. Oracle version (SELECT * FROM V$VERSION)
2. Sample data in the form of CREATE / INSERT statements.
3. Expected output
4. Explanation of expected output (A.K.A. "business logic")
5. Use \ tags for #2 and #3. See FAQ (Link on top right side) for details.
I'll try and take a stab at your request based on the data given. What your query says is that it will return all rows that have a date greater then 2/1/2010 (MM/DD/YYYY). If your query is returning all rows then maybe the possibility exists that all the dates in the table are greater then 2/1/2010. Have you checked all dates to see if this is the case?
Also, one note about your TO_DATE() function.to_date('FEB-01-2010:00:00:00','mm-dd-yyyy:HH24:MI:SS')The date format does not match the string you are using with respect to month. Your string has 'FEB' but the format is 'MM' which is the numeric representation of the month. Although Oracle was able to convert it to the proper date on my system you should try and maintain consistency between the string and the date format used.

On success of form save I want to go to another for with a detail where clause

I have the follow code snippet which is intented to go to a form on a successfull save. I query some data based on the save then build a url to navigate to a new form. I want the form to show only data that is lacking in one column not being populated (column is null). The url works, but the form detail where clause is ignored. Does anyone have any experience with passing detail where clauses to a form? Did I miss something in the code below?
begin
select count(rl_id) into n_rl_id_cnt
from rfq_lines
where part_part_id is null and rh_rh_id=n_rh_id;
exception
when others then
null;
end;
htp.p('cnt '||to_char(n_rl_id_cnt));
if n_rl_id_cnt>0 then
htp.p('cnt >1');
my_url := 'PORTAL30.wwa_app_module.link?' ||
'p_arg_names=_moduleid&p_arg_values=3677858481' ||
'&p_arg_names=_show_header&p_arg_values=YES' ||
'&p_arg_names=rh_id&p_arg_values=' || LTRIM(TO_CHAR(n_rh_id)) ||
'&p_arg_names=_rh_id_cond&p_arg_values=%3D'||
'&p_arg_names=_detail_where_clause&p_arg_values=part_part_id%20is%20null'; -- <this is not working right. where clause is ignored.
htp.p(my_url);
go (my_url);

Hi Jeffrey ,
You need to use a custom Format script for the field.
Regards
Sukrit Dhingra

Cardinality estimator 2014 is off with OR in where clause

Here is my test setup on SQL Server 2014.
-- Create big table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Store](
Id int IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
City int NOT NULL,
Size int NOT NULL,
Name varchar(max) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Store] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([Id] ASC)
GO
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX [IX_Store] ON [dbo].[Store] (City ASC, Size ASC)
GO
-- Fill with 100k rows
INSERT Store
SELECT i % 101, i % 11, 'Store ' + CAST(i AS VARCHAR)
FROM
(SELECT TOP 100000 ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY s1.[object_id]) AS i
FROM sys.all_objects s1, sys.all_objects s2) numbers
GO
-- Create small table
CREATE TABLE #StoreRequest (City int NOT NULL, Size int NOT NULL)
GO
INSERT #StoreRequest values (55, 1)
INSERT #StoreRequest values (66, 2)
Now I execute the following query (I force the index to show statistics estimates)
SELECT s.City
FROM #StoreRequest AS r
INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR r.City <> 55
Here are the estimates that I get (I'm not allowed to upload pictures):
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 50000
Fixing WHERE clause to use one table not two makes the estimate perfect:
SELECT s.City
FROM #StoreRequest AS r
INNER JOIN Store AS s WITH(INDEX(IX_Store), FORCESEEK)
ON s.City = r.City AND s.Size = r.Size
WHERE s.Size <> 1 OR s.City <> 55
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 89.74
Switching to 2012 compatibility mode gives estimate of 1 in both cases:
Index Seek IX_Store
Actual Number of Rows: 90
Estimated Number of Rows: 1
Could anyone explain the first result? I'm a bit worried about it. The fix in this case is trivial, but this problem gave us quite some headache in more complex real life queries with multiple joins.
Thank you!

But not full statistics on a field basis, just sometimes some default stats like total row count that some plans will build. Even your StoreRequest table only has one two-field index that will have a full histogram.
But I've seen SQL Server make massively bad plans on two-field indexes.
I've seen SQL Server go wrong one-column indexes, so that is not a very relevant point.
Temp tables or not, the estimate here is clearly incorrect. SQL Server knows the density of Size and City. It knows the cardinality of the temp table. The density information gives how many rows the the join will produce. The WHERE clause will then remove
a certain number of rows. With no statistics for the temp table, it does not now how many, but it will apply some standard guess.
50000 is a completely bogus number, because the join cannot produce that many rows, and SQL Server is able to compute the join with out the WHERE clause decently. (Well, it estimates 90, when the number is 180.) No, this is obviously a case of the cardinality
estimator giving up completely.
It is worth noting that both these WHERE clauses gives reasonable estimates:
WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
Whereas these two gives the spooky 50000:
WHERE s.Size <> 11 OR r.City <> 550
WHERE r.Size <> 11 OR s.City <> 550
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

How to compare result from sql query with data writen in html input tag?

how to compare result
from sql query with data
writen in html input tag?
I need to compare
user and password in html form
with all user and password in database
how to do this?
or put the resulr from sql query
in array
please help me?

Hi dejani
first get the user name and password enter by the user
using
String sUsername=request.getParameter("name of the textfield");
String sPassword=request.getParameter("name of the textfield");
after executeQuery() statement
int exist=0;
while(rs.next())
String sUserId= rs.getString("username");
String sPass_wd= rs.getString("password");
if(sUserId.equals(sUsername) && sPass_wd.equals(sPassword))
exist=1;
if(exist==1)
out.println("user exist");
else
out.println("not exist");

Create a view with a changing where clause

Hi all,
i'm developing an application with oracle forms i want to create a view in the database with a different where clause in every time , the where clause is determined due to the department id of the current user .
thanks alot.

SQL> create view emp_view as select empno, ename, deptno from emp;
View created.
SQL> select * from emp_view where deptno = 10;
     EMPNO ENAME          DEPTNO
      7782 CLARK              10
      7839 KING               10
      7934 MILLER             10
SQL>

Define a Standalone Download Integrator with an Additional Where clause - SQL error

Hi,
I am trying to create a standalone integrator with an Additional Where clause. Followed the steps mentioned in the metalink note 360105.1. When I run the integrator, I get the following error message.
Please resolve the following error to continue.
SQL error: ORA-00936: missing expression occurred
processing stored SQL for Content 20007:GENERAL_441_CNT.
When I look at the log file, here is what I can see:
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 TRACE          BneHrSQLControl - SQL:SELECT FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=$PARAM$.last_name
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 TRACE          validateSQLStatement value of sqlStatement is: SELECT FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=:RSQLP1
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 DETAIL         BneHrSQLControl.validateSQLStatement() paramName: last_name
10/22/14 10:50 AM AJPRequestHandler-HTTPThreadGroup-15 DETAIL         BneHrSQLControl.validateSQLStatement() error in SQL: java.sql.SQLSyntaxErrorException: ORA-00936: missing expression
So, clearly, the SQL statement that is getting built internally is wrong. Ideally, I would expect the statement to be something like this:
SELECT * FROM PER_PEOPLE_V where last_name=$PARAM$.last_name.
RDBMS : 11.2.0.3.0
Oracle Applications : 12.1.3
Any pointers towards the resolution of the issue would be of great help.
Thanks in Advance!
Lalitha.

This is a duplicate post of your other question: create trigger automatic
DO NOT start duplicate threads for the same question.
Locking this thread

Performance - composite index with 'OR' in 'WHERE' clause

I have a problem with the performance of the following query:
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index1) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where ((knr = 100 and actnr > 30) or knr > 100)
and rownum = 1;
(rownum used only for test purpose)
index:
create index on omschact (knr, projnr);
Execution plan:
Id Operation
0 SELECT STATEMENT
1 COUNT STOPKEY
2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID
3 INDEX FULL SCAN
If I'm correct, the 'OR' in the 'WHERE' clause is responsible for the INDEX FULL SCAN, what makes the query slow.
A solution would be then to separate the 'WHERE' clause in 2 separate select's (1 with 'knr = 100 and actnr > 30' and 1 with 'knr > 100' and combine the results with a UNION ALL.
Since it's necessary to have all rows in ascending order (oma_index1) I still have to use an ORDER BY to make sure the order of the rows is correct. This results again in a (too) low performance.
Another solution that does the trick is to create an index with the 2 fields (knr, projnr) concatenated and to use the same in the 'WHERE' clause:
create index oma_index2 on omschact (knr || projnr);
select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_index2) */ knr, projnr, actnr from omschact where (knr || projnr) > 10030;
I just can't believe this work-around is the only solution, so I was hoping that someone here knows of a better way to solve this.

padders,
I'll give the real data instead of the example. The index I really use consists of 4 fields. In this table the fields are just numbers, but in other tables I need to use char-fields in indexes, so that's why I concatenate instead of using formula's (allthough I would prefer the latter).
SQL> desc omschact
Name Null? Type
KNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
PROJNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
ACTNR NOT NULL NUMBER(8)
REGELNR NOT NULL NUMBER(3)
REGEL CHAR(60)
first methode:
SQL> create index oma_key_001(knr,projnr,actnr,regelnr);
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where
2 (knr > 100 or
3 (knr = 100 and projnr > 30) or
4 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000) or
5 (knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr >= 0));
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 1117430516
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 2 | INDEX FULL SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | 34030 (1)| 00:06:49 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("KNR">100 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30 OR "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30
AND "ACTNR">100000 OR "ACTNR"=100000 AND "KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND
"REGELNR">=0)
second method (same index):
SQL> select * from (
2 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr > 100
3 union all
4 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr > 30
5 union all
6 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr > 100000
7 union all
8 select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_key_001) */ * from omschact where knr = 100 and projnr = 30 and actnr = 100000 and regelnr > 0)
9 order by knr, projnr, actnr, regelnr;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 292918786
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 11M| 1203M| | 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 11M| 1203M| 2745M| 477K (1)| 01:35:31 |
| 2 | VIEW | | 11M| 1203M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:29 |
| 3 | UNION-ALL | | | | | | |
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 11M| 822M| | 192K (1)| 00:38:26 |
|* 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 11M| | | 33966 (1)| 00:06:48 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 16705 | 1272K| | 294 (1)| 00:00:04 |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 16705 | | | 54 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 47 | 3666 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 47 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 1 | 78 | | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_KEY_001 | 1 | | | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
5 - access("KNR">100)
7 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR">30)
9 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR">100000)
11 - access("KNR"=100 AND "PROJNR"=30 AND "ACTNR"=100000 AND "REGELNR">0)
third method:
SQL> create index oma_test(to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000'));
Index created.
SQL> select /*+ index_asc(omschact oma_test) */ * from omschact where
2 (to_char(knr,'00000000')||to_char(projnr,'00000000')||
3 to_char(actnr,'00000000')||to_char(regelnr,'000')) >=
4 (to_char(100,'00000000')||to_char(30,'00000000')||
5* to_char(100000,'00000000')||to_char(0,'000'))
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 424961364
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
| 1 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OMSCHACT | 553K| 55M| 1712 (1)| 00:00:21 |
|* 2 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OMA_TEST | 99543 | | 605 (1)| 00:00:08 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - access(TO_CHAR("KNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("PROJNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("
ACTNR",'00000000')||TO_CHAR("REGELNR",'000')>=TO_CHAR(100,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(3
0,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(100000,'00000000')||TO_CHAR(0,'000'))

Using Parameters in SQL-Query not only in where clauses

Hi,
I try to use Publisher parameters in the SQL Query from a Data Set.
All of them have default values.
So far, this is no problem, unless I try to use such a parameter value as an ordinary attribute value:
>
select
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."BETR_TEIL"
 else :pv_some_Text end as Betr_Teil,
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM"
 else :pv_some_Text end as Suva_Nr,
 case when (:pv_Group = 'no') then "DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH"
 else sum("DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") end as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in (:pv_nim100)
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
The parameters 'pv_Group' and 'pv_nim100' are working fine. (when or where clauses)
The parameter 'pv_some_Text' unfortunately not. (simple literals)
When I try to validate the above SQL, I get the following Error:

java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 46033] Datatype: 25 is not supported.

After use a cast function:
>
else CAST(:pv_some_Text AS CHARACTER)
>
I get this ERROR:

java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 19002] Incorrect use of parameters. The parameters used in CAST cannot be resolved without ambiguity.

We use OBIEE 11.1.1.6.4 on a Win64-System.
Thank's for any help.

Hi Alex,
let's leave away any unnecessary details.
This is the SQL, inserted in the window 'Edit Data Set' of BIP Data Model:
>
select
 '--1' as Betr_Teil,
 '--2' as Suva_Nr,
 sum("GDWH05"."DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in ('122-4.4')
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
Everything is fine when I click OK, the script goes back to the metadata.
Let's try this script with bind values in ORACLE SQL Developer.
This SQL is the physical part, found in the OBIEE-Log (Log level 5), except the bind values. Therefore we find, in the where clause, the join. In the logical sql, we don't have to join, because it's handled in the Common Enterprise Information Model (CEIM)
>
with
sawith0 as
select
sum(t39617.ris_vollbesch) as c1
from
dm15d_betriebsteil t39455,
dm15k_ris_fakten_pro_btt_jhr t39617
where
t39455.id_betriebsteil = t39617.id_betriebsteil
and t39455.suva_nr_form = '122-4.4'
select
d1.c1 as c1,
d1.c2 as c2,
d1.c3 as c3
from
select
:pv_some_text as c1,
:pv_some_text as c2,
sum(d1.c1) as c3
from
sawith0 d1
d1
where
rownum <= 65001
>
This SQL works fine, even with bind values for 'pv_some_text'.
But, when using the following SQL in the BIP Data Model:
>
select
 :pv_Text as Betr_Teil,
 :pv_Text as Suva_Nr,
 sum("GDWH05"."DM15K_RIS_FAKTEN_PRO_BTT_JHR"."RIS_VOLLBESCH") as Vollbesch
from "GDWH05"
where
 "DM15D_BETRIEBSTEIL"."SUVA_NR_FORM" in ('122-4.4')
 fetch first 65001 rows ONLY
>
The following ERROR occurs:
java.io.IOException: prepare query failed[nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 46008] Internal error: File server\Query\Optimizer\ServiceInterfaceMgr\Utility\Src\SQOIUTypeVisitor.cpp, line 643.
In my opinion, either I use a wrong syntax, or BIP has a problem with parsing the script.
Thank you for your most welcome help.

Query with || operator in IN clause

Hi All,
I am having two table emp_demo,dept_demo , below are the structure of the table :
create table emp_demo(
empno number primary key,
ename varchar2(20),
deptno number,
dept_loc varchar2(20),
dname varchar2(20)
create table dept_demo(
deptno number,
dept_loc varchar2(20),
dname varchar2(20)
Query 1 :
select * from emp_demo e where e.deptno||e.dept_loc||e.dname IN ( select d.deptno||d.dept_loc||d.dname from dept_demo d)
Query 2 :
select * from emp_demo e where e.deptno IN ( select d.deptno from dept_demo d)
and e.dept_loc IN ( select d.dept_loc from dept_demo d)
and e.dname IN ( select d.dname from dept_demo d)
Could anyone please confirm that both the query will returns the same results in any condition.
Thanks,
Rajendra

I agree with Karthick.
Your query with || cannot be guaranteed to return the correct results, as it's possible that the concatenation of different strings could result in the same overall string
As an illustrative example...
if you have two strings... forename "FRED" and surname "SAMUEL BLOGGS" (very posh double barrelled surname)
The concatenating these together can give us "FRED SAMUEL BLOGGS".
Now what if the two strings we had were: forenames "FRED SAMUEL" and surname "BLOGGS"
concatenating those together will also give us "FRED SAMUEL BLOGGS"
So we had two lots of data, with different starting strings that resulted in the same overall string.
In terms of your query, you should ideally join the data as Karthick showed, but just so you know, if you're wanting to do an IN clause on multiple columns, you do not concatenate the data together (it get's even more messy if the datatypes are different), but you actually treat all the columns as a set of data. You do that using syntax like this...
select *
from emp_demo e
where (e.deptno,e.dept_loc,e.dname) IN (select d.deptno,d.dept_loc,d.dname
from dept_demo d)
Your second query is also completely different from the first query as it removes the relationship between the individual columns. So, just because the dept_no is in the dept_demo table, and the dept_loc is also in the dept_demo table and the dname is also in the dept_demo table, doesn't mean that they all exist together on the same row of the dept_demo table. I very much doubt that is what you wanted.
SQL is set based. That's a key thing to remember.

Query with date variable selection

Greetings,
I am having problems with a SQL Query and wondering if someone could help me out. I have the following query and want to specify a WHERE clause and have the user select the date range they want to work with. If I specify a date the query runs fine. If I enter in the [%0] I get an error message saying: "incorrect syntax near '<'.
Any help would be appreciated.
select
'W' as prefix,
empid as [Employee Number] ,
U_PayrollCat as [Payroll Category Code],
'' as [Cost Center Code],
ContractID as [Job Center Code],
Segment_0 + isnull( ActSep + Segment_1, '') + isnull(ActSep + Segment_2, '')
 + isnull(ActSep + Segment_3, '') + isnull(ActSep + Segment_4, '')
 + isnull( ActSep + Segment_5, '') + isnull(ActSep + Segment_6, '')
 + isnull(ActSep + Segment_7, '') + isnull(ActSep + Segment_8, '')
 + isnull( ActSep + Segment_9, '') as [GL Account Code],
quantity as Units,
U_NBS_ITEMCOST/quantity as Rate,
U_NBS_ITEMCOST as Amount,
oclg.notes as Comments,
oclg.recontact as [WorkDate],
'' as[Department code]
from
oclg inner join
dln1 on dln1.docentry =oclg.docentry inner join
odln on odln.docentry = dln1.docentry inner join
ohem on ohem.userid = oclg.attenduser
inner join oitm on oitm.itemcode = dln1.itemcode
inner join oscl on oscl.callid = odln.U_NBS_S1Link
inner join OACT on OACT.AcctCode = dln1.cogsAcct
inner join oadm on 1=1
WHERE
oclg.recontact >= [%0] AND oclg.recontact <= [%1]

Gordon,
That worked with a few modifications. Removed comma on line before FROM clause and my UDF for Payroll Category is on my OITM table. Complete Query looked like this:
SELECT 'W' as prefix, t3.empid as 'Employee Number',
t4.U_PayCat as 'Payroll Category Code',
t5.ContractID as 'Job Center Code',
t6.Segment_0 + isnull( ActSep + t6.Segment_1, '') + isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_2, '')
+ isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_3, '') + isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_4, '')
+ isnull( ActSep + t6.Segment_5, '') + isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_6, '')
+ isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_7, '') + isnull(ActSep + t6.Segment_8, '')
+ isnull( ActSep + t6.Segment_9, '') as 'GL Account Code',
t1.quantity as Units,
t1.U_NBS_ITEMCOST/t1.quantity as Rate,
t1.U_NBS_ITEMCOST as Amount,
t0.notes as Comments,
t0.recontact as WorkDate
from dbo.oclg t0
inner join dbo.dln1 t1 on t1.docentry =t0.docentry
inner join dbo.odln t2 on t2.docentry = t1.docentry
inner join dbo.ohem t3 on t3.userid = t0.attenduser
inner join dbo.oitm t4 on t4.itemcode = t1.itemcode
inner join dbo.oscl t5 on t5.callid = t2.U_NBS_S1Link
inner join dbo.OACT t6 on T6.AcctCode = t1.cogsAcct
inner join dbo.oadm t7 on 1=1
WHERE t0.recontact >= '[%0]' AND t0.recontact <= '[%1]'
Thanks for the help,
Aaron

Pagination after executequery with a dynamic where clause

Hi all,
I have a problem with pagination after setting a where clause dynamically and performing an executequery in ViewObjectImpl.java.
As a result of this, the amount of records are decreased returned by the viewobject, however the pagination is not changed. It still reflects the previous amount. It changes only if you have selected the last range of the changed recordset
Does anybody know how to get the pagination to refect the correct amount of the updated recordset of the viewobject?
Jdeveloper version 10.1.3.4 / Jheadstart 10.1.3.3.81
Thanks in advance, Erwin

Hi,
I would not add this to the VO query. Instead I would create a View Criteria that uses a bind variable. Then in the Application Module Data Model, you select the VO instance and choose edit (button on top) to permanently associate the view criteria)
Advantages of this approach
- The VO definition can be used elsewhere without the restriction
- the bind variable is not mandatory and yu can set it such that if no value is provided a full query is executed
Frank

How to create VO with multiple dynamic where clauses on select with UNION?

I am trying to implement the View Object for the UNION query that looks like this:
     select a,b,c...
          from t1,t2,...
          where dynamic_where_clause1
     union all
     select a,b,c,...
          from t11,t12, ...
          where dynamic_where_clause2
There are up to 60 input parameters that are used to generate dynamic where clauses. They are actually created by calling PL SQL function.
So far, I was not able to assign both where clauses to the view object. Is there a workable solution for this problem, besides resorting to programmatic View Object?
I understand that recommended way with UNIONs is to wrap both queries into a parent select:
select * from (
     select a,b,c...
          from t1,t2,...
          where ... -- table relationship joints
     union all
     select a,b,c,...
          from t11,t12, ...
          where ... -- table relationship joints
) QRSLT
     where dynamic_where_clause
Unfortunately this approach doesn't work here, since individual selects are producing unmanageable amount of data and resulting query takes forever to complete.

I afraid I would not have any real benefits from using VO if I replace the entire query with every request. Actually, the performance may suffer.
I solved the problem by creating a POJO Data Control and invoking the custom select query from java. Not sure if it is the best approach to the problem, but implementation time is limited and it works.
Actually, this is not the first time I see the need to implement VO with complicated SQL like select with unions and dynamic pieces. It would be nice to find a solution and not resort to workarounds.
Edited by: viksicom on Aug 2, 2012 8:48 AM

Dynamic Order by with user defined Where clause...

Hello!
I have a block based on a table, with no order by set and no where clause.
The block is queryable so users can filter the data to be retrieved.
Each of the columns on the form have a button above which requeries the block, applying the order by (SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ( 'B12', ORDER_BY, :bc1.h_b12_custom_orderby ); )
The problem is that each time the block is requeried the user definied filter criteria is lost. Is there any way I can get a handle on this and maintain the filtering?
GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY(item, DEFAULT_WHERE); only retrieves the query entered while in design mode so this won't work.
I'm using Oracle Forms 6i, web based. Any suggestions are very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Jay

Many thanks for your response Hedy,
Below is the procedure I used to achieve this.
I found GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ( p_block, LAST_QUERY ) worked better than :SYSTEM.last_query. As the first time it is called within a block :SYSTEM.last_query returned the query made in another block - which I'm sure has it's applications.
Thanks again,
Jay
PROCEDURE set_last_query_where ( p_block IN VARCHAR2
, p_where IN VARCHAR2 DEFAULT NULL )IS
l_last_query VARCHAR2(10000);
l_last_where VARCHAR2(10000);
BEGIN
IF p_where IS NULL THEN
l_last_query := UPPER(GET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ( p_block, LAST_QUERY ));
l_last_where := SUBSTR ( UPPER ( l_last_query),
INSTR ( l_last_query, 'WHERE')+6, INSTR(SUBSTR(UPPER(l_last_query), INSTR(l_last_query, 'WHERE')+8), 'ORDER BY'));
ELSE
l_last_where := p_where;
END IF;
SET_BLOCK_PROPERTY ( p_block, DEFAULT_WHERE, l_last_where );
EXCEPTION
     WHEN FORM_TRIGGER_FAILURE THEN
     ref_raise_ftf;
     WHEN OTHERS THEN
     ref_others( 'P-SLQW' );
END;

Query with date in where clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for