Question on Insallation Approach for SOA 11.1.1.3

I would appreciate if any Fusion experts can answer this :
*Environment :OEL 5.3 64 bit, Oracle DB 11.1.0.7 , WLS 10.3.3, SOA Suite 11.1.13 and JRockit
I am setting up DEV environment
I installed Oracle DB 11.1.0.7 and RCU 11.1.1.3
I installed JRockit R27.5.0 for Java SE 6 for Linux x86-64” . While installing Web Logic Server 10.3.3 (generic) on 64 bit, I could see the Available JRockit 27.5 , I went ahead with that and I could install WLS. But while Installing SOA Suite I got this Error
java.lang.LinkageError: JAXB 2.0 API is being loaded from the bootstrap classloader, but this RI (from jar:file:/tmp/OraInstall2010-07-17_10-13-18PM/ext/jlib/glassfish.jaxb_1.2.0.0_2-1-7.jar!/com/sun/xml/bind/v2/model/impl/ModelBuilder.class) needs 2.1 API. Use the endorsed directory mechanism to place jaxb-api.jar in the bootstrap classloader. (See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/standards/)
I think this JRockit does not support SOA Suite 11.1.1.3 Right now WLS 10.3.3 is pointing to the JRockit 27.5 (not supported for SOA Suite)
Later I installed JRockit Mission Control 4.0.1 for Linux X86- 64. [jrmc-4.0.1-1.6.0-linux-x64.bin] in /u01/app/oracle/product
Now I went ahead with SOA Suite 11.1.1.2 runInstaller and then SOA 11.1.1.3 patch runInstaller , which worked .
But while creating SOA Domain I could only see JRockit 27.5 in Available JRockit list , so I browsed and selected jrmc-4.0.1-1.6.0 from product directory I installed and I could successfully create SOA Domain.
I can start Admin Server & Managed Server . Admin Server & SOA Server is shown up in Enterprise Manager. So far , I am assuming what I did is correct ??
QUESTIONS: -
1. But WLS is still pointing to JRockit 27.5 . Will there be any issues/ errors later during Deployment ?
2. Should I change or point the WLS to JRockit Mission Control. Can I do this without UN-INSTALLING . Like changing PATH or CLASS PATH , Can anyone suggest how to do?
3. Are they any post installation steps I need to follow?
Thanks
Arvind
Edited by: Arvind on Jul 19, 2010 10:13 AM
Edited by: Arvind on Jul 19, 2010 11:34 AM

Hi,
As you already have the cascade setup between Country and State set the default value for the state with SQL. The way to do it is use a presentation variable for country and use that variable in the state default sql as a filter. Sort the values and pick the 1st value in the sql. This would return the 1st value in the State prompt.
Let me know if this worked.
Regards,
Jay

Similar Messages

NEWBIE SOA Question:Appl Development for SOA

This question may have been answered elsewhere; if so, my apologies.
As a newbie to SOA, I am trying to wrap my head around the question of how app. development for SOA differs from traditional models. For example, non-SOA environments there are few external considerations when coding a process,
but in SOA environments, I understand everything is a service.
Can someone provide a few code snippets as to how they would look in each environment?
I have read through several documents on SOA and have done the SOA tutorial, etc. but I have yet to see a side-by-side comparison of application code in SOA and non-SOA environments.
How would an architect plan the translation and mapping of business objectives and functional requirements into a technical solution for SOA, architecting the SOA solution ?
I would really appreciate any pointers (links to articles, etc.) in this direction. Thank you.
Gordon

Hello Gordon,
SOA (Service Oriented Architecture) - as the name indicates, it's design is based on services. SOA is another integration technique which is used for small scale integration. SOA is an approach to have software resources in an enterprise available and discoverable on network as well defined services. Each service would achieve a predefined business objective and perform discrete units of work. The services are independent and do not depend on the context or state of the other services. They work within distributed systems architecture.
Few links which may help you in understanding SOA and it's design patterns -
http://blogs.oracle.com/jeffdavies/2008/10/architects_dictionary.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/soa/mastering-soa-series/part1.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/soa/mastering-soa-series/part2.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/soa/mastering-soa-series/part3.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/soa/mastering-soa-series/part4.html
http://www.oracle.com/technologies/soa/docs/soa-bp-design-patterns-whitepaper.pdf
http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/erl_soa_design_patterns_app_sequences.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/09-sep/o59architect.html
http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/tech_arch.html#soa
Regards,
Anuj

Logging approach for a SOA application

Hi All,
I am working on a design for logging in an integrated application which uses the Oracle SOA suite for a telecom industry solution. I have a BSS system which interacts with the SOA suite to communicate to OSS systems( Network elements in telecom).
I am interested in developing an approach for system logs and audit logs. Since all the system are disparate, can someone suggest a good approach. and references.
Thanks,
Purushottaman

At a high level there are two types of logging. System Logging for technical diagnostic problem and Logging for Auditing / Tracking that involves reporting business data
In any SOA integration its better to differentiate these two entirely different categories of logging to detect and resolve problems within a IT infrastructure.
The next hurdle would be to create a centralized hook for logging (not necessarily a central log ) that can integrate various logging formats by individual system at the same time have minimum dependencies between applications.
Taking into consideration challenges due to disparate services , multiple servers, different interaction schemes, and different types of user activities it helps to rely on ESB.

Approach for Inter Organisational BPM

Hi All,
I am doing Masters Dissertation in Collaborative BPM. My research topic is the evaluation of three approached for collaborating BPM across value chain.
Explanation of these approaches:
Centralise CBPM: Ownership of Collaborative System is with one Central Organisation and Other Partners Participate in this collaboration through various UI such as portal. Example, Collaboration between the automobile manufacturer and dealer were automobile manufacturer provides portal for dealer to place order, manage its customer and handle warranty and recalls.
Decentralise CBPM: In this approach every partner provides communication technology like Web Services for its Business Partner for collaboration. The ownership is decentralise and more flexible
Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes. In this case the same modelling facility is available across the value chain.
I found below critical aspects for evaluating these three approaches:
1] Autonomy
2] Collaborative process Modelling
3] Monitoring, Controlling, and Analysis
4] “Plug and Play” based Platform for Collaboration (Includes Security, Web Service and various adapters for communication and Language Support like Java for easy custom enhancement)
5] Governance
I kindly request you all to post your views about pros and cons for evaluating these approaches from the aforementioned critical aspects.
I welcome your questions and appreciate your valuable guidance.
Thank you ,
Regards,
Ganesh Sawant

PROS:
Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
CONS
Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

How to Approach for full implementation

We have a situation here that we r planning to implement
SAP BW. But here R/3 is not fully implemented. In this situation how to approach to prepare a Blueprint.
We are planning to implement SD,MM,PP,QM and FICO modules. We dont have any functional specs But we can communicate functional people. In this way how can I approach for each module.
Specially for INVENTORY and FI.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
As per my knowledge it is better if you have data at least for 5 five years but This is not mandatory. You can have BW even for 1 year data also.
Coming to your question Please contact the users and collect their requirements.
Ask them what reports exactly they are using?
What issues they have with the existing reports?
What additional fileds or colums they are expecting in BW?
Howmany users will be there?
How many roles do they have?
do they have any third party involved in the current reporting?
Do we have to ectract the data only from R/3 or from Thrid party tool (Ex Indian Statutory)also.
How many source systems do they have?
Hope this will give you idea. please post message iy you are not clear.
Vijay

Magic Values - A Question of Development Approach

Hello folks,
I have a question for you PL/SQ developers out there. This isn't a specific problem or query I'm raising here, more a question of general approach. I'm probably not using the correct terms here so forgive me. Also, I've already posted this in the ApEx forum, however there's a degree of overlap into pure PL/SQL so I thought you were all bound to have experience of something along the same lines.
Anyhoo...
How to deal with Magic values - i.e. values which hold no intrinsic value in and of themselves, other than for state, process or conditional logic control. I use them quite a lot in my PL/SQL code (as I'm sure most developers do in one context or another).
From a Data architecture perspective, I'll generally have some sort of table for storing the 'facts': names, addresses etc, etc. Any application-specific magic values ('status', 'type') will be held as a foreign key in this table, which will reference a form of lookup table.
Example:
EMOTION
ID   Description
==   ===========
1    HAPPY
2    SAD
3    NEUTRAL
PERSON
NAME ... EMOTIONAL_STATE
====       ===============
BILL       1
JERRY    1
BRIAN      3
DONNA    2So far, so banal...
Now, say I have a process that needs to reference someone's emotional state for some sort of conditional logic:
declare
   n_estate number;
begin
   select emotional_state into n_estate
     from Person
    where name = 'BILL';
   case when v_state = 1 then
      -- do something
   case when v_state = 2 then
      -- do something else
   else
      -- otherwise something else again
end case;
end;straight away your bad code radar should be going crazy: you're coding literals in there! So, the old java programmer in me wants to store these as constants - I'll generally square them away inside a package somewhere, like so:
create or replace package PKG_CONSTANTS as
   ES_HAPPY constant number:= 1;
   ES_SAD constant number := 2;
   ES_NEUTRAL constant number := 3;
end PKG_CONSTANTS;Thus the code becomes
Case when v_state = PKG_CONSTANTS.ES_HAPPY then ...Herein lies the crux of the issue. I'm effectively defining the same value twice: once in the lookup table (for data integrity) and once in the package. If new values are defined (say "Existential Ennui") or existing values are changed, I need to make sure the two are aligned, which hinders maintainability.
I thought about initialising the values as sort of pseudo-constants in the package initialise code but then you end up replacing one literal with another; you end up with code like:
create or replace package PKG_CONSTANTS as
   ES_HAPPY number;
   ES_SAD constant number;
   ES_NEUTRAL constant number;
end PKG_CONSTANTS;
create or replace package body PKG_CONSTANTS as
   rf_curs sys_refcursor;
begin
   for rf_curs in
      select ID
             ,description
        from EMOTIONAL_STATE;
   loop
      case description
      when 'HAPPY' then
         ES_HAPPY := ID;
      when 'SAD' then
         ES_SAD := ID;
      when 'NEUTRAL' then
         ES_NEUTRAL := ID;
      else
         null;
      end case;
   end loop;
end PKG_CONSTANTS;I also thought about using dynamic PL/SQL to re-write and recompile the constants package in the event of a value being changed in the lookup table...seems like quite a lot of work, given that the magic value is pretty much meaningless outside of the scope of the application.
So... how to deal with this? What approach to you take? Does data integrity over-ride application programming style?
Any contributions would be welcome!

Hello,
I had a look through the article (8 year's worth of thread? Sheesh that's dedication!) and yet it doesn't quite express exactly what I'm meaning. The argument there appears to be between dynamic SQL with bind variables versus static SQL. I'm not talking dynamically building queries or the use of bind variablers per se - its more related to how one makes use of magic values within the context of conditional logic and application code.
The example I chose happened to use a case statement, which maybe blurs the line with the syntax of pure SQL query and perhaps why you thought I was going down the dynamic SQL route, but I could just have easily replaced them with a series of 'if elsif else end' type expressions.
From an application developer point of view, the mantra of 'abstraction through constants' is the norm - referencing literals in expressions is generally frowned upon, with the possible exception of special numbers such as 1 or 0 (for incrementing counters, referring to the start of arrays etc, etc). One only has to look at the work of Feuerstein to see this - time and again in his books, the concept of delegating constant values (and subtypes) to well-defined areas (the "Single Source of Truth") rears it's head.
Now in the Oracle world, data architecture generally has primacy, which in this case manifests itself as the use of foreign keys in data tables referencing the equivalent lookups (dimensional modelling, star diagrams and the rest) - thus even special, application-specific values, i.e. with no intrinsic value in the real world, end up in your ERD. There appears to be a bit difference of opinon, depending on the background of the developer.
Hence my question - how do you, as developers, deal with these sorts of situations?

Performance of the LOD approach for network analisys

Hi to all,
I open new thread for speak about performance of LOD approach for Network analysis using Java API as continuing from this thread:
Partitioning of the Network for using LOD API
I remember you that:
- I'm using Oracle 11g R2;
- my network consist of 7.817.372 of links and 6.662.079 of nodes (big network);
- LINK_LEVEL of links table is setted as NULL;
- I have partitioned the network with these procedure:
partition:
EXEC sdo_net.spatial_partition('ITALIA', 'ITALIA_PART$', 10000, 'WORK_DIR_ITALIA', 'ITALIA_PART.log', 'a', 1);
and for partition blob:
EXEC sdo_net.generate_partition_blobs('ITALIA', 1, 'ITALIA_PBLOB$', true, true, 'WORK_DIR_ITALIA', 'ITALIA_PBLOB.log', 'a');
- I'm using LOD Java API for network analysis with Netbeans IDE; I took the code from NDM_tutorial of Hillsborough network.
My first analysis is the compute of the shortest path between two extreme nodes (about 1.500 km of distance) and between two near nodes (about 80 km of distance) using Dijkstra and AStar algorithm.
I did the following tests on execution times of the compute of the shortest path:
1) with partition of maximum 10000 nodes for partition (from log file I read that were been generated 1024 partitions with 1 link level):
- between two extreme nodes, about 1 minute and 50 seconds.
- between two near nodes, about 20 seconds.
then I have re-executed the two previous procedures where I changed the value of maximum nodes for partition and I did other tests:
2) with partition of maximum 15000 nodes for partition (from log file I read that were been generated 512 partitions with 1 link level):
- between two extreme nodes, about 1 minute and 50 seconds and sometimes it goes out of memory
- between two near nodes, about 20 seconds.
3) with partition of maximum 5000 nodes for partition (from log file I read that were been generated 2048 partitions with 1 link level):
- between two extreme nodes, about 1 minute and 50 seconds and sometimes it goes out of memory
- between two near nodes, about 20 seconds.
4) with partition of maximum 2000 nodes for partition (from log file I read that were been generated 4096 partitions with 1 link level):
- between two extreme nodes, about 1 minute and 50 seconds and sometimes it goes out of memory
- between two near nodes, about 15 seconds.
I think that there is any problem because I expect execution times more lower (maximum 5-6 seconds for extreme nodes).
Even changing the maximum number of nodes to partition the execution times do not change much.
I remember you that with in-memory approach on Oracle 10gR2 the execution times for every computation between two nodes was of about 4 minutes and sometimes it goes out of memory. With LOD on Oracle 11gR2 the execution times are reduced but are too long for me.
Now, my questions are:
- @Jack Wang: (if you're reading me) do you know what are the execution times for the compute of shortest path between two nodes for USA network (about 1500 km of distance)? I remember that you have used LOD for USA (56 Millions of link and 20 Millions of nodes).
- Do you think that I wrong anything? How can I do for reduce the execution times of network analysis?
If you need any more information just ask.
Thank you to all in advance very much.

Jack Wang wrote:
Are the 12/13 seconds computation times for the near node pair?Yes.
You can look at an example for computing hierarchical shortest path with a 2-level network(NAVTEQ_SF) under ndm_tutorial
~ \ndm_tutorial\examples\java\src\lod\SpWithMultiLinkLevels.java.But I think that yesterday I had not yet used the LINK_LEVEL = 2 in network analysis. Infact, I used the code into ShortestPathAnalysis.java where linkLevel is always setted = 1.
Now, I'm using the example SpWithMultiLinkLevels.java and I'm seeing that linkLevel is setted = 2 before the execution of Dijkstra and AStar algorithm. This code works with Hillsborough_network. Instead with my network (note that I'm using a region of Italy with 700.000 link and 600.000 nodes called ITAI11_METERS for to test a network with 2 LINK_LEVEL), I have a problem during readPartitionFromBlob.
This is the code:
package calcolopercorsolod;
import java.io.*;
import java.sql.*;
import java.text.*;
import java.util.*;
import oracle.jdbc.OracleConnection;
import oracle.jdbc.pool.OracleDataSource;
import oracle.spatial.util.Logger;
import oracle.spatial.network.UserDataMetadata;
import oracle.spatial.network.lod.*;
import oracle.spatial.network.lod.config.*;
import oracle.spatial.network.lod.util.PrintUtility;
public class SpWithMultiLinkLevels
private static NetworkAnalyst analyst;
private static NetworkIO networkIO;
private static void setLogLevel(String logLevel)
    if("FATAL".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_FATAL);
    else if("ERROR".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_ERROR);
    else if("WARN".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_WARN);
    else if("INFO".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_INFO);
    else if("DEBUG".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_DEBUG);
    else if("FINEST".equalsIgnoreCase(logLevel))
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_FINEST);
    else //default: set to ERROR
        Logger.setGlobalLevel(Logger.LEVEL_ERROR);
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception
        String configXmlFile = "LODConfigs.xml";
        String logLevel    =    "DEBUG";
        String dbUrl       = "jdbc:oracle:thin:@oracle:1521:mySID";
        String dbUser      = "myUser";
        String dbPassword = "myPass";
        String networkName = "ITAI11_METERS";
        long startNodeId = 15323;
        long endNodeId   = 431593;
    int linkLevel      = 1;
    double costThreshold = 1550;
    int numHighLevelNeighbors = 8;
    double costMultiplier = 1.5;
    Connection conn    = null;
    //get input parameters
    for(int i=0; i<args.length; i++)
        if(args.equalsIgnoreCase("-dbUrl"))
dbUrl = args[i+1];
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-dbUser"))
dbUser = args[i+1];
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-dbPassword"))
dbPassword = args[i+1];
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-networkName") && args[i+1]!=null)
networkName = args[i+1].toUpperCase();
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-linkLevel"))
linkLevel = Integer.parseInt(args[i+1]);
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-configXmlFile"))
configXmlFile = args[i+1];
else if(args[i].equalsIgnoreCase("-logLevel"))
logLevel = args[i+1];
// opening connection
conn = LODNetworkManager.getConnection(dbUrl, dbUser, dbPassword);
System.out.println("Network analysis for "+networkName);
setLogLevel(logLevel);
//load user specified LOD configuration (optional),
//otherwise default configuration will be used
InputStream config = ClassLoader.getSystemResourceAsStream(configXmlFile);
LODNetworkManager.getConfigManager().loadConfig(config);
//LODConfig c = LODNetworkManager.getConfigManager().getConfig(networkName);
//get network input/output object
networkIO = LODNetworkManager.getCachedNetworkIO(
conn, networkName, networkName, null);
//get network analyst
analyst = LODNetworkManager.getNetworkAnalyst(networkIO);
double[] costThresholds = {costThreshold};
try
System.out.println("*****Begin: Shortest Path with Multiple Link Levels");
System.out.println("*****Shortest Path Using Dijkstra");
String algorithm = "DIJKSTRA";
linkLevel = 2;
costThreshold = 5000;
LogicalSubPath subPath = analyst.shortestPathDijkstra(new PointOnNet(startNodeId),
new PointOnNet(endNodeId),linkLevel, null);
PrintUtility.print(System.out, subPath, true, 10000, 0);
System.out.println("*****End: Shortest path using Dijkstra");
System.out.println("*****Shortest Path using Astar");
HeuristicCostFunction costFunction = new GeodeticCostFunction(0,-1, 0, -2);
LinkLevelSelector lls = new DynamicLinkLevelSelector(
analyst, 2, costFunction, costThresholds,
numHighLevelNeighbors, costMultiplier, null);
subPath = analyst.shortestPathAStar(
new PointOnNet(startNodeId), new PointOnNet(endNodeId), null, costFunction, lls);
PrintUtility.print(System.out, subPath, true, 10000, 0);
System.out.println("*****End: Shortest Path Using Astar");
System.out.println("*****End: Shortest Path with Multiple Link Levels");
catch (Exception e)
e.printStackTrace();
if(conn!=null)
try{conn.close();} catch(Exception ignore){}
and this is the output with the error:...
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::isNetworkPartitioned, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT p.PARTITION_ID FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PART$ p WHERE p.LINK_LEVEL = ? AND ROWNUM = 1 [2]
[QueryUtility::prepareIDListStatement, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT NODE_ID, PARTITION_ID FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PART$ p WHERE p.NODE_ID IN ( SELECT column_value FROM table(:varray) ) AND LINK_LEVEL = ?
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::readNodePartitionIds, DEBUG] Query linkLevel = 2
[NetworkIOImpl::readLogicalPartition, DEBUG] Read partition from blob table: partition 4, level 2
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::readPartitionBlobEntry, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT BLOB, NUM_INODES, NUM_ENODES, NUM_ILINKS, NUM_ELINKS, NUM_INLINKS, NUM_OUTLINKS, USER_DATA_INCLUDED FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PBLOB$ WHERE PARTITION_ID = ? AND LINK_LEVEL = ? [4,2]
[QueryUtility::prepareIDListStatement, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT NODE_ID, PARTITION_ID FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PART$ p WHERE p.NODE_ID IN ( SELECT column_value FROM table(:varray) ) AND LINK_LEVEL = ?
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::readNodePartitionIds, DEBUG] Query linkLevel = 1
[NetworkIOImpl::readLogicalPartition, DEBUG] Read partition from blob table: partition 91, level 1
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::readPartitionBlobEntry, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT BLOB, NUM_INODES, NUM_ENODES, NUM_ILINKS, NUM_ELINKS, NUM_INLINKS, NUM_OUTLINKS, USER_DATA_INCLUDED FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PBLOB$ WHERE PARTITION_ID = ? AND LINK_LEVEL = ? [91,1]
[NetworkIOImpl::readLogicalPartition, DEBUG] Read partition from blob table: partition 91, level 2
[LODNetworkAdaptorSDO::readPartitionBlobEntry, DEBUG] Query String: SELECT BLOB, NUM_INODES, NUM_ENODES, NUM_ILINKS, NUM_ELINKS, NUM_INLINKS, NUM_OUTLINKS, USER_DATA_INCLUDED FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PBLOB$ WHERE PARTITION_ID = ? AND LINK_LEVEL = ? [91,2]
oracle.spatial.network.lod.LODNetworkException: java.lang.NullPointerException
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkIOImpl.readPartitionFromBlob(NetworkIOImpl.java:549)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkIOImpl.readLogicalPartition(NetworkIOImpl.java:436)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.CachedNetworkIOImpl.readLogicalPartition(CachedNetworkIOImpl.java:114)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.CachedNetworkIOImpl.readLogicalPartition(CachedNetworkIOImpl.java:105)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkExplorer.getPartition(NetworkExplorer.java:335)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.LabelSettingAlgorithm.getElementPartition(LabelSettingAlgorithm.java:520)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.LabelSettingAlgorithm.expand(LabelSettingAlgorithm.java:561)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.LabelSettingAlgorithm.shortestPath(LabelSettingAlgorithm.java:1362)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkAnalyst.shortestPathHierarchical(NetworkAnalyst.java:2523)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkAnalyst.shortestPathDijkstra(NetworkAnalyst.java:2291)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkAnalyst.shortestPathDijkstra(NetworkAnalyst.java:2268)
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkAnalyst.shortestPathDijkstra(NetworkAnalyst.java:2249)
at calcolopercorsolod.SpWithMultiLinkLevels.main(SpWithMultiLinkLevels.java:135)
Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException
at oracle.spatial.network.lod.NetworkIOImpl.readPartitionFromBlob(NetworkIOImpl.java:542)
... 12 more
I don't understand why the analysis does a query with PARTITION_ID=91 and LINK_LEVEL=2:
Query String: SELECT BLOB, NUM_INODES, NUM_ENODES, NUM_ILINKS, NUM_ELINKS, NUM_INLINKS, NUM_OUTLINKS, USER_DATA_INCLUDED FROM PROVA.ITAI11_PBLOB$ WHERE PARTITION_ID = ? AND LINK_LEVEL = ? [91,2]
Infact I have 512 PARTITION_ID associated to LINK_LEVEL=1 and only 16 PARTITION_ID associated to LINK_LEVEL=2. Why it search PARTITION_ID=91 with LINK_LEVEL=2? This correspondance doesn't exist.
Where I wrong?
Note that if I set LINK_LEVEL=1 it works.
Thank you very much

Data migration approach for Scheduling Agreements

Gurus,
Can anyone provide guidance on the data migration approach for Scheduling Agreements? How can we migrate the open delivery schedules and the respective cumulative quantities? The document type being used is "LZ".
Can correction deliveries (Doc type - LFKO) be used update the initial cumulative quantities?
Any help in this regard is higly appreciated.
Regards,
Gajendra

Hi Zenith
You might find useful information here: IS-U data export (extraction) for EMIGALL.
I've done numerous IS-U migrations in the last 10+ years, but never one from IS-U to IS-U.
One main questions to start with: Are the two systems on the same release level?
If they are not and it would be too much effort to get them onto the same release level I would think creating your own extract programs and using the Migration workbench (EMIGALL) is the way to go.
If they are on the same level, there might possible other ways to do it, dependent on the differences between the two systems (mainly around customising). Assuming there are significant differences - otherwise why would you bother migrating? - there's the high probability that using EMIGALL is the way to go as well.
Yep
Jürgen

Better approach for storing Messages ?

Hello all,
I am developing a Email module which does resembles yahoo or hotmail.
To my understanding POP3 dosn't support Folder creation and IMAP does. But, i have to go for POP3 only.
SO, i thought that i have to go for storing it in database(Message Object) as Byte array.
so, i have created sent fodler, save folder, draft and custom folders all in database for storing all this message as javax.mail.Message object.
Since i can't store Message object i have created a wraper class which implemets serialization.
Now my questions is
1. is my approach for folder with database is correct ?
2. if yes, then is it good to store Wraper class as a hole in database. or can i go for divinding the message into parts and store invidualy in database.
3. if my approach is wrong then how can i go about ?
awaiting for everybody's reply
dina

When through your thinking before :)
The correct way is to save Message object to disk, i.e cache so we
don't read from server. To save to database is your choice but it's
extra overhead. And if you intend client is going to install the
program on their desktop, database is out of the question.
The secret is making a simple database design as explain below, like
Microsoft outlook.pst or look at Netscape cache folders to see their
design too. Similar...
Message object is not savable, i.e not implemting serialization but
their is a way to save the mail messages to disk.
We use the writeTo method of MimeMessage class to save the whole
email, including attachments as one whole object stream.
I use one file for each mail folder, like Microsoft and Netscape does..
The reason is we might want to copy the whole inbox, which in effect
is copying the one file to another folder for backup etc...
Same reason for compressions
So you might ask, one file, that inefficient isn't it?
Not really it's how you design it.
Your mail file should have lookup keys of message id's of your message
objects. Hence, with message id in a file one can get the ObjectOutputStream in a file with a simple lookup. We use object output
stream as message class writeTo, writes to output stream, and using
ObjectOutputStream to store and retrieve makes a whole lot of sense.
The cahce mail storage should be using a RandomAccessFile and their
are package classes you can download from JavaWorld to have access
to writing and reading object streams from a file using the random
access file. So no need to worry about database as it does the
hard work for you. Search for RandomAccessFile in JavaWorld and
dowload that package.
RandomeAccessFile class is quite differently to other IO classes as
it does fast seeking, i.e the file points to different positions of
the file very quickly. Even if you inbox file is 70 megs big, it can
still handle it very quickly.
This should help you clear most of the design problems that I also
ponder for quite some time

Best Approach for Security in WebCenter Portal Application

Hi,
We are analyzing a right approach for webcenter portal security on an application . We found that we can do all Roles and Security in Page Hierarchy which in turn stores the security details in Jazn-data.xml . Is this the right approach for defining the roles and security for a webcenter portal application .
What is the importance of Configuring WS_security in webcenter Portal Application and do we need to define this WS_Security even after defining them in page hierarchy. Could you please guide us on this .
Thank you,
Sashank P

Hi Shashank,
First sorry for late reply,
WS_Security, can you please explain what do you mean by WS_Security, from the term i could not infer which part you are talking about.
Let me tell you about the Webcenter security -
This is the heirarchy , the Fusion middelware forms the base with webcenter at the top.\
Webcenter Security
|
ADF Security
|
Fustion Midddleware Security (OPSS)
Now you are goin to apply security to your Webcenter and ADF layers.
Lets come back to the question .
Any webcenter portal, you have to use the Jazn-Data.xml file to secure all the content whether its the navigation /pages /admin pages/taskflows etc.
Its pretty much easy to use , let me know if you have any difficulty on that.
Page hierarchy -> Yes you have an option to set your security for pages alone, here you have addition fine grain permisions (update/delete/personalise etc).
If you need those fine grain permissions you can use this.
To Conclude i would say use jazn-data for taskflows/components/admin page protection etc.
Use Page heirarchy's fine grain permission to pages and navigation model's visible attribute to show/hide navigation based on user's roles.
Let me know if this helps

Best approach for uploading document using custom web part-Client OM or REST API

Hi,
Am using my custom upload Visual web part for uploading documents in my document library with a lot of metadata.
This columns contain single line of text, dropdownlist, lookup columns and managed metadata columns[taxonomy] also.
so, would like to know which is the best approach for uploading.
curretnly I am trying to use the traditional SSOM, server oject model.Would like to know which is the best approach for uploading files into doclibs.
I am having hundreds of sub sites with 30+ doc libs within those sub sites. Currently its taking few minutes to upload the files in my dev env. am just wondering, what would happen if the no of subsites reaches hundred!
am looking from the performance perspective.
my thought process is :
1) Implement Client OM
2) REST API
Has anyone tried these approaches before, and which approach provides better performance.
if anyone has sample source code or links, pls provide the same
and if there any restrictions on the size of the file uploaded?
any suggestions are appreciated!

Try below:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sridhara/archive/2010/03/12/uploading-files-using-client-object-model-in-sharepoint-2010.aspx
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9847935/upload-a-document-to-a-sharepoint-list-from-client-side-object-model
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/103503/How-to-upload-download-a-document-in-SharePoint
public void UploadDocument(string siteURL, string documentListName,
string documentListURL, string documentName,
byte[] documentStream)
using (ClientContext clientContext = new ClientContext(siteURL))
//Get Document List
List documentsList = clientContext.Web.Lists.GetByTitle(documentListName);
var fileCreationInformation = new FileCreationInformation();
//Assign to content byte[] i.e. documentStream
fileCreationInformation.Content = documentStream;
//Allow owerwrite of document
fileCreationInformation.Overwrite = true;
//Upload URL
fileCreationInformation.Url = siteURL + documentListURL + documentName;
Microsoft.SharePoint.Client.File uploadFile = documentsList.RootFolder.Files.Add(
fileCreationInformation);
//Update the metadata for a field having name "DocType"
uploadFile.ListItemAllFields["DocType"] = "Favourites";
uploadFile.ListItemAllFields.Update();
clientContext.ExecuteQuery();
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Best approach for backup and transport (NW BPC 7.5)

Hi,
we are currently in a situation, where we have developed a prototype in a Q (quality) envoirnment. This has been a standalone system sofar.
Now we have a Development->Quality->Production envoirnment - and I want to move my prototype from the Quality system to my Development system.
I'm thing about the "UJT_BACKUP_RESTORE_UI" program. I will not copy masterdata and transactional data.
My question is now. Is it possible to backup my Appset prototype in Quality and restore it under a new Appset Name in development, and then put in it a transport request ?
Or would I have problems with technical names for cubes and dimensions ?
What is the best approach ?
Thank you,
Joergen
Edited by: jdalby on Jun 14, 2011 9:49 PM

Hi,
First of all, you should have posted your question in the BPC for NW forum.
Coming back to your question, you can try the transaction UJBR. You can take the backup of metadata / masterdata / transaction data or any combination of those.
I wont suggest you to change the name of the backup files. Instead, you can create a copy of the appset and then take the backup and restore it in DEV.
Hope this helps.

11G OSR for SOA Governance

Hi All,
From the product it self we all know that OSR is main for the repository for web services in a organisation. But how and what is the best practice to be apply to have a success case on the SOA governance. How effective when it integrating with OSB. Lets have some discussion on this. I am currently planning from the ground to have a success SOA environment as well as with the SOA governance in place. Maybe with some question posted out can start the discussion easily.
1. From the main feature we know that OSB can easily integrated with the OSR, in a SOA environment is it a best practice to expose all the web service into OSR or to expose only the OSB services in OSR?
2. How OSR can help the SOA governance? which area of SOA governance can gain the benefit of using OSR?

I have very little direct experience with OSR, but there is an excellent chapter on OSR in this book https://www.packtpub.com/ws-bpel-2-0-for-soa-with-oracle-soa-suite-11g/book
it gives you the patterns of adoption of these products (OSB, OSR) in a SOA solution.
I vaguely remember it was saying that OSR starts paying dividend once you have more than 50-something services, but its early adoption from the beginning of the project can be beneficial so you get used to the discipline.

Physical to Virtual Migration Approach for Exchange CCR 2007 on Windows 2003 Ent Edition

Hi Team,
I am running Two exchange 2007 CCR in my environment on Physical node on windows 2003 ENT edition. MY Hardware is end of life and we are planning to migrate/Converting them into virtual environmnet running Vsphere 5.1.
can any one let me know the best approach to virtualize exchange CCR .
Exchange CCR details are :-
Windows 2003 Ent edition.
Excahnge 2007.
Quorum is configuraed on shared folder.
Exchange Primary replicating Data on Exchange Secondry ..Both Primary and Secondry are having Raid 10 Local Disks.

Hi Ravi,
you can take a couple of approaches here. First off, I want to make sure you are not wanting to do a P2V conversion, that is taking the OS image that is running on the physical host and, using VMware Converter, create a virtual machine from it. You could do it that way but, depending on how much mail data is there it could take a long time and it's not the preferred approach for Exchange.
I'm going to make a couple of assumptions here:
I'm assuming upgrading to Exchange 2010 is out of the question (if it is not just do that and move mailboxes )
I'm assuming that there is plenty of storage in the vSphere environment to satisfy the requirements of Exchange. Obviously you would have to provide enough storage for all mail data x 2 if you want to continue with CCR.
Your message says "local disks", so I'm guessing the RAID 10 you mention is not available for use for these virtual machines and that you will provide some type of shared storage.
So, if you have enough compute within a vSphere cluster and enough storage (capacity and IO) to satisfy CCR I see two options:
Leapfrog approach
1. Shutdown passive
2. Evict passive from CCR cluster
3. Create new VM, Clustering services, Exchange/add as passive to the cluster (you could run setup in recovery mode /m:recoverserver, but I don't see why you would want to in a cluster)
4. Seed databases
5. Failover
6. Repeat for other physical
New Cluster
1. Create two new VMs
2. Create new CCR Cluster
3. Install Exchange active/passive
4. Move mailboxes
5. Decomm physicals
Obviously these are very high level but the approaches are straight forward. If this is your only set of Exchange servers in the environment you will have to account for any public folders/system folders, etc. Take some time and check out compute usage in the current environment so you are sure you have plenty of compute in the vSphere environment, especially if you are moving into a shared environment.
-alex

What is the best approach for integrationg EP-XI_seibel

can anybody suggest good approach for EP-XI-Seibel integration project.it is very urgent.please help

If its a real Business process interfaces then you can use XI as a middleware to create the process and represent the data in the XI,mind you that SAP XI licensing is done using the amount of through-put passing through the xi.In order to do so you can use a seible adapter developed by Iway which translate the seible data to XML ready to be manipulated by XI.
If its a presentation of seibel data .e.g seibel screens, you might like to search for a way to view the sieble through EP6 (iView).(might be cheaper then using XI...)
Hope this covers your questions..
Best regards
Nimrod Gisis

Question on Insallation Approach for SOA 11.1.1.3

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for