Approach for Inter Organisational BPM

Hi All,
I am doing Masters Dissertation in Collaborative BPM. My research topic is the evaluation of three approached for collaborating BPM across value chain.
Explanation of these approaches:
Centralise CBPM: Ownership of Collaborative System is with one Central Organisation and Other Partners Participate in this collaboration through various UI such as portal. Example, Collaboration between the automobile manufacturer and dealer were automobile manufacturer provides portal for dealer to place order, manage its customer and handle warranty and recalls.
Decentralise CBPM: In this approach every partner provides communication technology like Web Services for its Business Partner for collaboration. The ownership is decentralise and more flexible
Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes. In this case the same modelling facility is available across the value chain.
I found below critical aspects for evaluating these three approaches:
1] Autonomy
2] Collaborative process Modelling
3] Monitoring, Controlling, and Analysis
4] “Plug and Play” based Platform for Collaboration (Includes Security, Web Service and various adapters for communication and Language Support like Java for easy custom enhancement)
5] Governance
I kindly request you all to post your views about pros and cons for evaluating these approaches from the aforementioned critical aspects.
I welcome your questions and appreciate your valuable guidance.
Thank you ,
Regards,
Ganesh Sawant

PROS:
Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
CONS
Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

Similar Messages

  • Peer-to-Peer approach for Cross Organisation BPM

    What are the pros and cons of using Peer-to-Peer based decentralise approach for managing Inter-Organisational BPM?
    ( Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes.  In this case the same modelling, monitoring, and implementation technology is available across the value chain. )
    What are the challenges and what are the benefits from the aspects like autonomy, governance, security, modelling, monitoring, and process ownership?
    Thanks you
    Regards
    Ganesh Sawant
    Edited by: ganesh sawant on Jul 16, 2011 8:45 PM

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Autonomy is Inter organisational BPM

    Which approach is suitable for maintaining high degree of autonomy in inter organisational BPM?
    How it affects the ownership of processes?
    These approaches are Centralise, Decentralise, and Peer-to-Peer.
    Explanation of these approaches:
    Centralise CBPM:  Ownership of Collaborative System is with one Central Organisation and other Partners Participate in this collaboration through use of various UIu2019s such as portal.  Example, Collaboration between the automobile manufacturer and dealer were automobile manufacturer provides portal for dealer to place order, manage its customer and handle warranty and recalls.
    Decentralise CBPM: In this approach every partner provides communication technology like Web Services for its Business Partner for collaboration.  The ownership is decentralise and more flexible
    Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes.  In this case the same modelling, monitoring, and implementation technology is available across the value chain.
    I kindly request your views and appreciate any questions and guidance.
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant

    Hi Afzal,
    in all the customizing setting of note 308989 are good, then those fields should be filled.
    Please check it very carefully.
    Please check in customizing of sales order type (transaction VOV8) if the intercompany billing type maintained.
    In case of stock tranfer order intercompany (where there is not sales order), run transaction 0VLK, display the delivery type used, and check the order type present in field 'Default Ord.Ty.' (usually it is 'DL').
    Then check in VOV8 for this sales order type.
    If everything is fine, then it is necessary to debug the delivery creation.
    The field LIKP-VKOIV etc. should be filled in program FV50XFLK_LIKP_FUELLEN_IV in intercompany sales; program FV50XFLK_LIKP_FUELLEN_IV_UML in stock transfer order intercompany.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • Web Services in Inter Organisation BPM

    Hi All,
    What are the pros and cons of using web service based decentralise approach for managing Inter-Organisational BPM? What are the challenges and what are the benefits?
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Autonomy, Governance and Monitoring Inter Organisational BPM

    Hi All,
    Which technological approach is suitable for implementing Collaborating BPM across the value chain from the point of view of Autonomy, Governance, Security, and Monitoring? What are the benefits of selecting the one approach over the other?
    These approaches are Centralise, Decentralise, and Peer-to-Peer.
    Explanation of these approaches:
    Centralise CBPM: Ownership of Collaborative System is with one Central Organisation and other Partners Participate in this collaboration through use of various UI’s such as portal. Example, Collaboration between the automobile manufacturer and dealer were automobile manufacturer provides portal for dealer to place order, manage its customer and handle warranty and recalls.
    Decentralise CBPM: In this approach every partner provides communication technology like Web Services for its Business Partner for collaboration. The ownership is decentralise and more flexible
    Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes. In this case the same modelling, monitoring, and implementation technology is available across the value chain.
    I kindly request your views and appreciate any questions and guidance.
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Autonomy, Governance and Monitoring in Inter Organisational BPM

    Which technological approach is suitable for implementing Collaborating BPM across the value chain from the point of view of Autonomy, Governance, Security, and Monitoring?  What are the benefits of selecting the one approach over the other?
    These approaches are Centralise, Decentralise, and Peer-to-Peer.
    Explanation of these approaches:
    Centralise CBPM:  Ownership of Collaborative System is with one Central Organisation and other Partners Participate in this collaboration through use of various UIu2019s such as portal.  Example, Collaboration between the automobile manufacturer and dealer were automobile manufacturer provides portal for dealer to place order, manage its customer and handle warranty and recalls.
    Decentralise CBPM: In this approach every partner provides communication technology like Web Services for its Business Partner for collaboration.  The ownership is decentralise and more flexible
    Peer-to-Peer CBPM: In ideal condition in this approach every Partner should have the same technology which is developed for handling collaborative Business Processes.  In this case the same modelling, monitoring, and implementation technology is available across the value chain.
    I kindly request your views and appreciate any questions and guidance.
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Challenges in Implementing Inter Organisation BPM

    Hi all,
    What are the Technical and Business challenges for implementing collaborative BPM across the value chain?
    What critical aspects need be considered for implementing Cross Organisational BPM?
    Thank you,
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant
    Edited by: ganesh sawant on Jul 16, 2011 8:57 PM

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Process Ownership in Cross Organisation BPM

    Hi all,
    What are the pros and cons of using Peer-to-Peer based decentralise approach for managing Inter-Organisational BPM?
    What are the challenges and what are the benefits from the aspects like autonomy, governance, security, modelling, monitoring, and process ownership?
    Regards,
    Ganesh Sawant

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Role of Web Services in cross organisation BPM

    What are the pros and cons of using web service based decentralise approach for managing Inter-Organisational BPM? What are the challenges and what are the benefits?
    Regards
    Ganesh Sawant

    PROS:
    Using the Webservices you can trigger the BPM Process and pass the values from the web dypro component which will available for the end user and pass it on to the BPM Proess.
    We can use EJB as a webservice, where the automated activity in the BPM can output the value based on the logic in the EJB Function. We can manage the automated activity which runs in the back ground of the process as per our logic and returns the value to the next task.
    CONS
    Using Webservices in the various activity with fewer data is not advisable as it takes longer time to deploy the process. And any change in the data in the webservices requires regularly re importing of the web services.

  • Best approach for IDOC - JDBC scenario

    Hi,
    In my scenarion I am creating sales order(ORDERS04) in R/3 system and which need to be replicated in a SQL Server system. I am sending the order to XI as an IDoc and want to use JDBC for sending data to SQL Server. I need to insert data in two tables(header & details). Is it possible without BPM?  Or what is the best approach for this?
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Yes, this is possible without the BPM.
    Just create the Corresponding Datatype for the insertion.
    if the records to be inserted are different, then there wil be 2 different datatypes ( one for header and one for detail).
    Do a mutlimapping, where your Source is mapped into the header and details datatype and then send using the JDBC sender adapter.
    For the strucutre of your Datatype for insertion , just check this link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/7e/5df96381ec72468a00815dd80f8b63/content.htm
    To access any Database from XI, you will have to install the corresponding Driver on your XI server.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3867a582-0401-0010-6cbf-9644e49f1a10
    Regards,
    Bhavesh

  • Organizational data for inter-company billing missing in plant 2200

    Organizational data for inter-company billing missing in plant 2200

    Dear Siva,
           This may be related to incompleteness in the inter -company billing configuration settings so go through this IMG path then do the proper settings,
    SPRO>Sales and distribution>Billing>Inter company billing>Assign organisational units by plant, here you need to assign the Sales organisation,Distributional channel and Division (sales area) to the 2200 plant.
    Now you try
    I hope it will help you
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Best approach for syndication in Central MDM

    MDM 7.1
    CE 7.2
    ERP 6 EHP4
    PI 7.1 EHP1
    We are currently developing a custom application using CE/BPM workflow for central maintenance of customer master data. One of the topics under discussion is the right approach for syndication once a record is complete.
    [This |http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60a3118e-3c3e-2d10-d899-ddd0b963beba?quicklink=downloads&overridelayout=true] SAP document on collaborative material master data creation provides one way to achieve this syndication by first calling a web service from BPM to create record in ERP before checking in MDM. While I am personally fine with the approach, some of the other colleagues aren't too keen on issuing synchronous calls from BPM. Rather, they would like to use the syndication engine of MDM to transmit data to downstream systems (currently only SAP ERP) using Idocs. But there is a caveat here. To use syndication, the record has to be checked in.
    The problem is that if the record is checked in MDM, it is ready for modification. However, the asynchronous call to ERP using Idocs for creation of customer master might fail for any number of reasons. In this case, the MDM record might need a modification before resubmitting to ERP. In the meantime, since the record was checked in before syndication, someone else might have checked it out, potentially resulting in data quality issues. So to avoid this situation, the developer has decided to take the approach to check in -> syndicate -> check out -> wait for confirmation Idoc -> check in if success. This isn't a clean approach to syndicate but might address the record locking issue.
    Another consideration is to design the application with the view that sometime in the future, this master data might have to be syndicated to other SAP and non-SAP systems as well. To ensure syndication to all downstream systems is complete before checking in MDM can be a tricky requirement and might need some complex ccBPM development or evaluating something similar to two-phase commit (might be an overkill). In any case, a best practice approach for keeping downstreams systems in sync with MDM in case of central MDM has to be shared by SAP. So it would be good to have comments of the people who developed the reference application for collaborative material master data creation.
    If there are any customers who have come up with a custom solution which works, please do share the experience.
    Thanks and regards,
    Shehryar

    Thanks Ravi. While there are more than one possible solutions to the immediated problem, I am actually looking for a design pattern which SAP recommends or a customer has developed to address the issues related to synchronization of master data in a Central MDM environment.
    The idea behind a central master data management function, as you know, is that all participating business systems use the same basic master data being authored in MDM. This data has to be synchronized with all participating systems, rather than just one system. To me, a ccBPM workflow or 2 phase commit design pattern seem to be the solution. But it would be good to know how other customers are addressing the issue of master data synchronization with multiple systems, or SAP's recommendations for this issue.
    Regards,
    Shehryar

  • Best approach for IDs mapping..

    Hello,
    I'd like to ask you for your experiences about classical integration problem: mapping of IDs (materials, partners...)
    What is the best approach for integration between SAP and other systems? Can you give me some hints?
    Thanx, Peter

    Hi Peter,
    you have 4 ways to do it:
    1. you can do it inside an integration process:
    RFC call for checking a table with ID -> ID mappings
    (not so good as you have to use integration process)
    but very easy to biuld as this is standard 
    2. table in R/3 and changing the values in a user exit
    (you maintaint the data in a table in R/3)
    the fastest way (no calls to other programs)
    but you have to create user exits and
    this is not why you (your client) bought the XI  
    3. you can use this new RFC API
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/uuid/801376c6-0501-0010-af8c-cb69aa29941c
    which seems to be the best approach
    as you don't need BPM for this and it's a standard
    4. value mapping tables in XI...
    Regards,
    michal
    Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

  • Tax code field under INVOICE Tab to be Mandatory for Inter Company PO

    Dear All,
    In MIRO  Tax code field under INVOICE Tab to be Mandatory for Inter Company PO u2013 ZNB & ZRT for company code 0001.
    How do we set as mandatory fields for those two intercompany document types.
    Regards,
    Teja

    Hi
    If u want to maintain tax code as mandatory field in PO?
    Then SPRO- SAP IMG- MM- Purchasing - Purchase order- Define document types
    In this check the filed selection key for the document types.
    Then select the SPRO- SAP IMG- MM- Purchasing - Purchase order- Define svreen lay out at document level.
    In this for the field selection key select GR/IR control and click on tax as required. and then save
    It will not allow to create PO with out maintaoning tax code.
    If u want to do tax code as mandatory in MIRO
    Then Go to OLMRLIST and make changes accordingly.
    Thanks
    Raman

  • Different sales area for Inter company stock transfer and STO

    Hi People,
                           Is it possible to have two different sales area's for Inter company stock transfer and within the company stock transfer. The problem is in below step
    IMG->MM->Purchase Order->Setup stock transport order->Define shipping data for plants.
    In this step when you define plant as customer, the same plant as customer needs to be maintaind for both STO and Inter company and there is only one entry of sales area possible for this single plant. So, how can the task be achieved.
    I want that STO should be carried out by sales area lets say X/Y/Z
    Inter company should go through A/B/C.

    hi dear,
               It is not possible at all to have two sales area for given Plant in STO.
               What is issue in that u can Transfer any MATERIAL, just need to extend it to given sales area.
    Reagrds
    AJIT K SINGH
    HAPPY TO HELP U

Maybe you are looking for

  • Unable to register system with sconadm

    I'm trying to get smpatch working within my environment so I can get our patch management/automation under control. I've been able to successfully get this working on 1 system. When attempting to get this working on a second system, I have had nothin

  • Attachment "there" but not downloading

    Hi, I'm having trouble trying to download a JPEG file. I've gotten an email saying "1 Attachment, 0 bytes". There's no image there that I can see. I switch to a view the Raw Source in the message and can see loads of code there, so I tried to copy th

  • Can't open any pdf in email attachments.

    Can open pdf already saved to computer, but can't open from email.  Windows 7, Firefox 25.0.1, Adobe Reader 11.0.4, and Plugin 11.0.4.63.  Email is yahoo (at&t version). Edit: It is the yahoo/att.net email program as I can open the pdf in another ema

  • Link to Specific Location in a Newly Opened file

    I set up a link that opens another file.  Is there a way to go to a specific location (i.e. bookmark) in the file automatically "on Open"? Thanks for the help!!!

  • Noted items In FAGLFLEXA

    Hi Friends, I have a query regarding noted items. Does noted items appear in FAGLFLEXA table. Is there and config required to enable it to appear in FAGLFLEXA. Thanks, Rashmi