Question on Select query

Hi,
I need to prepare a select query which can fetch the below mentioned scenario:
Ztable has fields zident, date, time, status. (zident, date, time are key fields)
zident      date        time               status
10001    02/09/09    111111                s
10001    02/08/09    222222                p
10001    02/07/09     333333               s        from this set only one ident should come which
10001    02/01/09     333333               s        has latest status
10001    02/02/09     333333               s
10001    02/03/09     333333               s
10002    02/09/09    111111                s
10002    02/08/09    222222                p
10002    02/07/09     333333               s      from this set only one ident should come which
10002    02/01/09     333333               s      has latest status
10002    02/02/09     333333               s
10002    02/03/09     333333               s
              and so on.............
from one set of ident one record should come in this way so many set of idents will be there.
My question is how to form the select query

Hello Chandra,
Your solution lies in the concept of Control-Break Statements.
AT NEW..
AT END OF
AT LAST, etc.
DATA:
BEGIN OF fs_table,
    zident TYPE char20,
    date   TYPE sy-datum,
    time TYPE sy-uzeit,
    status TYPE C,
END OF fs_table.
DATA:
        t_table LIKE
STANDARD TABLE
              of   fs_table.
" Populate the data in Internal Table.
" While displaying data.
LOOP AT t_table INTO fs_table.
AT NEW status.
     WRITE:/ fs_table-status.
ENDAT.
     WRITE:/ fs_table-zident,
                  fs_table-date,
                  fs_table-time.
ENDLOOP.
You can also use ON CHANGE OF fs_table-status, instead of AT NEW, if you get ***//* for date and time.
With this, status will be displayed once and remaining will following under it.
If you want everything to be displayed on change of each new field, apply that to every field,
eg:
AT NEW zident.
   WRITE:/ fs_table-zident.
ENDAT.
AT NEW date.
   WRITE: fs_table-date.
ENDAT.
.. so on and so forth.
This is just a test-case, try using the control break statements.
Hope it helps you.
Thanks: Zahack

Similar Messages

Question about select query.

Hi,
i want to insert the result of query to a table,
all the fields are corresponding except one field.
is there a way to this or i need to do
insert ( f1 , f2 ....)
i did this way
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE It_Return_Date
but i have another field which i want to insert to table.
is it possible??
10X

lets say you are getting values from a table
select & into X_TAB1 from TAB1.
data : x_tab2 type table2.
x_tab2-newfield = 'new value'. "Populate that new field value
move corresponding X_TAB1 TO X_TAB2. "all other will copy here
then use X_TAB2 to insert to your TABLE2.
INSERT TABLE2 FROM X_TAB2.
it would be a good practice to use same structure of the table while you use Insert/modify etc.. commands.
else you can declare TABLES ZTABLE2.
MOVE CORRESPONDING ZTABLE1 TO ZTABLE2.
ZTABLE2-NEW_FIELD = <NEW VALUE>.
then use INSERT.
INSERT ZTABLE2.
Regards
srikanth
Message was edited by: Srikanth Kidambi

Questions on the most efficient select query..

What is the difference between the two select query & please explain y is the 2nd select query more efficient??
DATA: MAX_MSGNR type t100-msgnr.
MAX_MSGNR = '000'.
SELECT * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
WHERE SPRSL = 'D' AND
ARBGB = '00'.
CHECK: T100_WA-MSGNR > MAX_MSGNR.
MAX_MSGNR = T100_WA-MSGNR.
ENDSELECT.
DATA: MAX_MSGNR type t100-msgnr.
SELECT MAX( MSGNR ) FROM T100 INTO max_msgnr
WHERE SPRSL = 'D' AND
ARBGB = '00'.

Hi,
First never use Check statement in the Select.
Next thing Select ... end select.
Coming to ur question In case of first select it will fetch each record from the data base and compares that record value with the variable(MAX_MSGNR) and assigns the value to the variable. And this process will continue till the select reads all the records of the data base. Also these operations happens on the data base server. SO this query not only affect ur program but also others who is accessing the same data base.
Second query is most efficient because of the aggregate function MAX. Here it will fetch all the records in single go and checks the max value for that column using
optimising algorithm. So number of checks, assignments(single assignment) and fetches will be less compared to first select. This is the main reason. Hope this clarified ur doubt.
Another thing is in first query we are selecting all the fields where as in second we are selecting only one field(required)
Thanks,
Vinod.
Edited by: Vinod Kumar Vemuru on Mar 13, 2008 4:55 PM

Dynamic Select query question

I have a select query which uses a session variable in the
where clause like so:
select employee_lastname
from employee
where employee_id IN (#session.ids#)
This runs fine if I have only 1 employee id in session.ids,
but if I have multiple (i.e. 22,26,49) it crashes. Do I need to do
some sort of list or string conversion on my session variable?
Thanks in advance!
Dave

I re-read my reply and it came off as if i didn't read your
(op) last post, sorry about that. I attempted to recreate your
effect (see code below) I did a 'quick' session on the output page;
<cfquery datasource="#DSN#" name="test">
select busName, ID
from Hernandomembers
</cfquery>
<body>
<form id="form1" name="form1" method="post"
action="delme.cfm">
<label>
<select name="list" id="select" multiple="multiple">
<cfoutput query="test">
<option value="#ID#">#busName#</option>
</cfoutput>
</select>
</label>
<label>
<input type="submit" name="button" id="button"
value="Submit" />
</label>
</form>
Collects the selections of members from my DB and sends it to
a page with ....
<cfset SESSION.employee_ids=StructNew()>
<cfset SESSION.employee_ids="#form.list#">
<cfoutput>#SESSION.employee_ids# 
</cfoutput>
<cfquery datasource="#DSN#" name="test">
select busName,ID
from Hernandomembers
where ID IN(#SESSION.employee_ids#)
</cfquery>
<cfoutput query="test">
#ID# - #busName# 
</cfoutput>
And it works just as yours should.. So i guess I'd still like
to see how your getting the selections into the session, if not the
same way as me.

Oracle 11g :SELECT query blocked..??

Hi Experts,
could you please explain why the below SQL query is blocked?
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL is blocking the SQL statement on GTTAPPUSR@gttccuatcriba04 ( SID=469 ) blocked SQL -> DELETE FROM GTTDB.PURCHASE_ENTRY_ID=:1
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL is blocking the SQL statement on GTTAPPUSR@gttccuatcriba04 ( SID=367 ) blocked SQL -> DELETE FROM GTTDB.PURCHASE_ENTRY_ID=:1
I am scratching my head without any solution when I had a look at the db today. Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Boris
Edited by: user12075620 on Dec 4, 2012 8:58 AM

The SELECT statement is not blocking the UPDATE. As I said in the previous reply, the string that this query produces does not match the logic.
This query is (at least on the surface) correctly identifying that session 1 is blocking session 2. Session 1 holds some lock that session 2 is waiting on. So far, so good. Since session 2 is waiting on the lock, we can easily enough see what session 2 is running (the UPDATE statement). But since session 1 is not blocked, it is potentially off running a ton of other SQL statements (or no SQL statement at all). The query is looking to see what session 1 is running currently. It has no way of determining what session 1 ran at some point in the past to acquire the lock in the first place.
Going back to my KING example,
At noon, session 1 runs
UPDATE emp
SET sal = sal * 2
WHERE ename = 'KING'Session 1 now has a lock on the KING row in the EMP table. But session 1 neither commits nor rolls back, it is still in a transaction. Session 1 might not have any more activity for a long time-- the user might go off to lunch, for example (obviously, applications should not be designed to allow users to maintain open transactions indefinitely, but not all applications are designed correctly). Or it might start running other queries. Let's say that session 1 now runs a query that is going to go for an hour
SELECT *
FROM giant_view_with_lots_of_computationsNow, at 12:45, session 2 comes in and runs
UPDATE emp
SET bonus = 100
WHERE ename = 'KING'Session 2 is blocked. Session 2 is running the UPDATE statement. Session 1 still holds the lock but it is running some completely unrelated SQL statement.
If we run the query you posted, the query will correctly report that session 1 is running the query against the GIANT_VIEW_WITH_LOTS_OF_COMPUTATIONS but incorrectly imply that this SELECT query is the source of the lock. It is not. It simply happens to be the query that the session that does hold the lock happens to be executing at the current moment (why the application seems to be running a lot of queries that select a constant from dual is a separate question).
Justin

Select query differences between oracle 9 and oracle 8.

Hi,
I have a problem using the select query between oracle 7 and oracle 9i I don't have the same result :
ex:
With oracle7
SQL> select 'champ1','champ2' from DUAL;
'CHAMP 'CHAMP
champ1 champ2
With Oracle 9
SQL> select 'champ1','champ2' from DUAL;
'CHAMP1' 'CHAMP2'
champ1 champ2
So Can someone tell me how to solve this problem ? Is there a parameter in oracle 9 to set?
Thanx.

Whenever you are posting anything over internet forums like this - you should be very careful about not just posting the details which requires to solve the problem - also should be sensible about your question.
This is not at all desired when you are posting such question. It may be because - you may not well aware of the fact.
My suggestion is -> First Go through the basics Of SQL in general.
Then go for any specific product like Oracle/ SQL Server/ Sybase etc.
And, finally learn the advanced commands of that DB.
You asked it - may be you thought the difference in output in terms of lines. But, that is not your actual output. That is the graphical display part only.
Anyway,
You can get the quite familier output by first type the following command ->
set lin 310Regards.
Satyaki De.

Select query is working on oracle 10.1.0 but its not working in 10.2.0

select query is working and retrieving some data from oracle database server 10.1.0.2.0, but same query is not working in 10.2.0.1.0 database server, its throws(ORA-00942: table or view does not exist)
But schema related tables and relevant details are same in 10.2.0.1.0 database server, so don't think that table is missing on that schema.
Note: Query length is upto 480 line
I have validate all the things, everything is fine, i don't why that query is not executing in different version.
I am in helpless in this situation?, anybody faced this issue?
Thanks in advance

Validated means all the tables and and columns are verified, i just running in sqlprompt,
Say for example:
sql> select * from table1;
One thing i observed while executing the query its showed error in one location of select sql. i mean particular word in select sql.
After that i combined some three lines of huge select sql into single then i am getting error in different location i mean different word...
My question is how same query executing in Oracle 10g Release 1, same dump (its exported from Release1) imported into oracle 10g release 2 is not executing. its shows Table or view doesn't exit.

Performance issue with select query and for all entries.

hi,
i have a report to be performance tuned.
the database table has around 20 million entries and 25 fields.
so, the report fetches the distinct values of two fields using one select query.
so, the first select query fetches around 150 entries from the table for 2 fields.
then it applies some logic and eliminates some entries and makes entries around 80-90...
and then it again applies the select query on the same table using for all entries applied on the internal table with 80-90 entries...
in short,
it accesses the same database table twice.
so, i tried to get the database table in internal table and apply the logic on internal table and delete the unwanted entries.. but it gave me memory dump, and it wont take that huge amount of data into abap memory...
is around 80-90 entries too much for using "for all entries"?
the logic that is applied to eliminate the entries from internal table is too long, and hence cannot be converted into where clause to convert it into single select..
i really cant find the way out...
please help.

chinmay kulkarni wrote:Chinmay,
Even though you tried to ask the question with detailed explanation, unfortunately it is still not clear.
It is perfectly fine to access the same database twice. If that is working for you, I don't think there is any need to change the logic. As Rob mentioned, 80 or 8000 records is not a problem in "for all entries" clause.
>
> so, i tried to get the database table in internal table and apply the logic on internal table and delete the unwanted entries.. but it gave me memory dump, and it wont take that huge amount of data into abap memory...
>
It is not clear what you tried to do here. Did you try to bring all 20 million records into an internal table? That will certainly cause the program to short dump with memory shortage.
> the logic that is applied to eliminate the entries from internal table is too long, and hence cannot be converted into where clause to convert it into single select..
>
That is fine. Actually, it is better (performance wise) to do much of the work in ABAP than writing a complex WHERE clause that might bog down the database.

How to get number of rows return in SELECT query

i'm very new in java, i have a question:
- How to get number of rows return in SELECT query?
(i use SQL Server 2000 Driver for JDBC and everything are done, i only want to know problems above)
Thanks.

make the result set scroll insensitve, do rs.last(), get the row num, and call rs.beforeFirst(), then you can process the result set like you currently do.
         String sql = "select * from testing";
         PreparedStatement ps =
          con.prepareStatement(sql,ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE,ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
         ResultSet rs = ps.executeQuery();
         rs.last();
         System.out.println("Row count = " + rs.getRow());
         rs.beforeFirst();~Tim
NOTE: Ugly, but does the trick.

Can I retrieve data from a multiple select query?

I recently have been able to consolidate many queries into one large one, or into large compound queries. I found an instance where I am using a select query in a for loop that may execute up to 400 times. I tried building a huge compound query, and using DB Tools Execute Query vi, followed by the DB Tools Fetch Recordset Data vi. The query executes at the database without an error, but the Fetch Recordset Data vi only returns the first instance. Is there a way to retrieve all the data without having to send up to 400 separate select queries?

Sorry I didn't replt earlier, I was on vacation. The query I am using is to check serial numbers, and determine if they are all valid. The programs purpose is to define a serial number to a pre-existing part number. Our company makes inclinometers and accelerometers, and this entire series of LabVIEW programs is designed to automate the calibration and testing of these units. The part number definitions can contain 3 or 4 hundred parameters, so the database itself consistes of 44 tables with potentially several hundred columns per table. It is designed to not only provide definitions to every part number, but also to store all potential raw unit data to be calculated and formed into a report at any time. The logistics of getting that much data in and out of the database have forced me to do things more effeciently. The actual query in question is to take each serial number either manually entered, or automatically picked, and see if they already exist with the part number they are being defined as. If there are any duplicates, then the program will alert the operator that serial numbers x, y, and z for instance have already been asigned as the part number in question. Currently I run a simple query once for each serial number. This works, but there may be 200 serial numbers assigned. Also the serial numbers can contain upper or lower case letters. By making all the serial number letters into capitals, then into lower case, it could mean up to 400 individual queries going out over the LAN. This is a bandwidth hog, and time consuming. I started experimenting with compound queries. The actual query used is below.
SELECT SERIALNO FROM "maintable" WHERE PARTNO = '475196-001' AND SERIALNO = '3000005';SELECT SERIALNO FROM "maintable" WHERE PARTNO = '475196-001' AND SERIALNO = '3000006';SELECT SERIALNO FROM "maintable" WHERE PARTNO = '475196-001' AND SERIALNO = '3000007';SELECT SERIALNO FROM "maintable" WHERE PARTNO = '475196-001' AND SERIALNO = '3000008';SELECT SERIALNO FROM "maintable" WHERE PARTNO = '475196-001' AND SERIALNO = '3000009'
When I execute this query, SQL Server 2000 has no problem with it, but the DB Tools Fetch Recordset Data vi only returns the first match. I think my answer may lie with OR statements. Rather than sending what amounts to potentially dozens of individual queries, I should be able to chain them into one query with a lot of OR statements. As long as the OR statement is not an exclusive OR statement, I think it should work. I haven't tried it yet, and it may take some time to get the syntax right. The query is built in a for loop with the number of iterations equal to the number of serial numbers being defined. Once I get this working I will alter it to include both upper and lower case letters that can be included in the query. Any suggestiona of how the query should be structured would be most helpful, or another way to achieve what I am trying to accomplish.
SciManStev

Issue in select query

HI All experts, 
i have a program in which i have a select query <pre>
SELECT b~vertrag
 a~anlage
 a~operand
 a~saison
 a~ab
 a~ablfdnr
 a~bis
 a~wert1
FROM ettifn AS a INNER JOIN ever AS b
ON aanlage = banlage
INTO TABLE li_captran PACKAGE SIZE p_pack
WHERE a~anlage IN s_anlage
 AND a~ab <= l_date
 AND a~bis >= l_date
 AND a~operand IN ('ID-CAPLOAD','ID-OBLT')
 AND b~einzdat <= l_date
 AND b~auszdat >= l_date.</pre> 
this query is taking a lot of time in running and we are facing lot of performance related issues
 
kindly guide me how i can break this into som simpler query
 
ettifn has 10 million records
ever has around 5 million records .
 
also please tell me how much data i can store into an internal table
can i store 5 million records in an internal table ??????
is it good in terms of performance of a program if not please tell me what is the better way of doing dat .
 
also tell me how secondry indexes help in improving performance of select query
is it good to maintain number of secondry indexes in a standard table or it decreases performance of a standard table .
 
<pre>
TYPES: BEGIN OF ty_eanlh,
 anlage LIKE eanlh-anlage,
 bis LIKE eanlh-bis,
 tariftyp LIKE eanlh-tariftyp,
 END OF ty_eanlh.
DATA: l_date TYPE datum.
DATA: li_eanlh TYPE HASHED TABLE OF ty_eanlh WITH UNIQUE KEY anlage
 bis
 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: li_captran TYPE HASHED TABLE OF ty_captran WITH UNIQUE KEY vertrag
 anlage
 operand
 saison
 ab
 ablfdnr
 WITH HEADER LINE.
DATA: l_tariftyp LIKE eanlh-tariftyp.
l_date = p_date + 6.
l_date = p_date + 5. "As per Terry's Request 1/23/2009
CHECK NOT p_cap IS INITIAL.
Get Operand Values
SELECT b~vertrag
 a~anlage
 a~operand
 a~saison
 a~ab
 a~ablfdnr
 a~bis
 a~wert1
FROM ettifn AS a INNER JOIN ever AS b
ON aanlage = banlage
INTO TABLE li_captran PACKAGE SIZE p_pack
WHERE a~anlage IN s_anlage
 AND a~ab <= l_date
 AND a~bis >= l_date
 AND a~operand IN ('ID-CAPLOAD','ID-OBLT')
 AND b~einzdat <= l_date
 AND b~auszdat >= l_date.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND NOT li_captran[] IS INITIAL.
 Get Rate Category
 SELECT anlage
 bis
 tariftyp
 FROM eanlh INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE li_eanlh
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN li_captran
 WHERE anlage = li_captran-anlage
 AND ab <= l_date
 AND bis >= l_date.
 Get POD ID
 SELECT a~anlage
 a~int_ui
 a~dateto
 a~timeto
 b~ext_ui
 INTO TABLE i_pod
 FROM euiinstln AS a INNER JOIN euitrans AS b
 ON aint_ui = bint_ui
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN li_captran
 WHERE a~anlage = li_captran-anlage.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0 AND NOT i_pod[] IS INITIAL.
 SORT i_pod BY anlage.
 SELECT vertrag
 int_ui
 serviceid
 FROM eservice
 INTO TABLE i_servicect
 FOR ALL ENTRIES IN i_pod
 WHERE int_ui = i_pod-int_ui
 AND service_start <= l_date
 AND service_end >= l_date
 AND service = 'ESUP'.
 ENDIF.
 LOOP AT li_captran.
 i_ct-anlage = li_captran-anlage.
 READ TABLE li_eanlh WITH KEY anlage = li_captran-anlage.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
 i_ct-tariftyp = li_eanlh-tariftyp.
 READ TABLE i_rate WITH KEY tariftyp = i_ct-tariftyp.
 IF sy-subrc NE 0.
 CONTINUE.
 ENDIF.
 ELSE.
 i_ct-tariftyp = '0000'.
 ENDIF.
 READ TABLE i_pod WITH KEY anlage = li_captran-anlage.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
 READ TABLE i_servicect WITH KEY int_ui = i_pod-int_ui.
 IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
 i_ct-serviceid = i_servicect-serviceid.
 ENDIF.
 ENDIF.
 IF li_captran-operand = 'ID-CAPLOAD'.
 i_ct-cap = li_captran-wert1.
 ELSEIF li_captran-operand = 'ID-OBLT'.
 i_ct-tran = li_captran-wert1.
 ENDIF.
 COLLECT i_ct.
 CLEAR: li_captran, i_ct.
 ENDLOOP.
 ENDIF.
ENDSELECT.</pre> 
this code is taking a lot of time to execute and decreasing the system performance . 
please guide me how can i increase the performance of this code . 
Thanks in advance 
Edited by: Matt on Oct 11, 2009 9:45 PM

Hi matt ,
no i am not thru bcoz of formatting i just trying to remove it and i just marked it answered so that it will not come in my unanswered because unanswered questions are limited.
also could you please help me in this question .
now how can i change this question to unanswerd .
plz guide me
Thanks in advance

Select query performance improvement - Index on EDIDC table

Hi Experts,
I have a scenario where in I have to select data from the table EDIDC. The select query being used is given below.
SELECT docnum
          direct
          mestyp
          mescod
          rcvprn
          sndprn
          upddat
          updtim
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_edidc
FROM edidc
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_error_idoc
WHERE
upddat GE gv_date1 AND
upddat LE gv_date2 AND
updtim GE p_time AND
status EQ t_error_idoc-status.
As the volume of the data is very high, our client requested to put up some index or use an existing one to improve the performance of the data selection query.
Question:
4.    How do we identify the index to be used.
5.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
6.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
Regards ,
Raghav

Question:
1.    How do we identify the index to be used.
Generally the index is automatically selected by SAP (DB Optimizer ) ( You can still mention the index name in your select query by changing the syntax)
For your select Query the second Index will be called automatically by the Optimizer, ( Because the select query has u2018Updatu2019 , u2018uptimu2019 in the sequence before the u2018statusu2019 ) .
2.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
(Create a new Index with MANDT and the 4 fields which are in the where clause in sequence )
3.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
( Since the index which will be newly created is only the 4th index for the table, there shouldnu2019t be any side affects)
After creation of index , Check the change in performance of the current program and also some other programs which are having the select queries on EDIDC ( Various types of where clauses preferably ) to verify that the newly created index is not having the negative impact on the performance. Additionally, if possible , check if you can avoid into corresponding fields .
Regards ,
Seth

How to escape the special character ' (ascii 39) in a select query?

Hi,
does anybody know how to escape the special character ' (ascii 39) in a select query?
I've tried a lot of ways but nothing seems to work, for example I try to get all
names in table foo where coloumn name contains a '-sign (ascii 39)
select name from foo where name like '%\'%';
select name from foo where name like '%{'}%';
select name from atg_horse where name like '%chr(39)%'
... but neither works, I end up with a ORA-01756: quoted string not properly terminated
I would apriciate any help
/Carl-Michael

friends
thanks for ur time and effort that u gave to reply to my problem.
But my main problem is that when my application (VC++ 7) fires the following query in the oracle database , it does not return any rows.
SELECT count(*) FROM ORGANISATION WHERE UPPER(ORGANISATION.ORGANISATIONNAME)
LIKE N'β%' ORDER BY ORGANISATION.ORGANISATIONNAME
the above question in the previous thread was just to check on sql plus as it's editor does not support unicode characters.

How to truncate a field in a Select Query

Hello Gurus,
I am new in SAP, i have a question i am making an appointment letter in SMARTFORMS , in global declaration (initialization) i am using a select query
SELECT SINGLE BET01 FROM PA0008 INTO G_BET01 WHERE PERNR = WA_PERNR.
where BET01 is the Amount field which is getting printed in the smart form but its takes 5 to 6 character blank spaces in the printing time, i want to truncate this space (remove this space ) in the print time , please tell me how to remove this space , the field size is 13 , how can i reduce the field size in my smartform query. please help . G_BET01 is a variable

Maybe you can use this.
DATA: d_char(15).
WRITE G_BET01 TO d_char CURRENCY 'XXX'.
'Then you can remove the spaces using :
CONDENSE d_char no-gaps.

Problem in the "select" query....Just check out and help me

Hi there !!
I am getting the following errors while trying to execute the "select" query from JSP page:
java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Invalid cursor state
My code is :
String reg_no=(String)session.getAttribute("reg_no");
ResultSet rs=stmt.executeQuery("SELECT * FROM reg WHERE regno = "+reg_no);
(Note: the "regno" in the database is of numeric datatype)
Try to help me...
Thanx,
Ram.

Just so everyone knows:
Ram Mohan joined the forum on 7-Sep-2003 and received
his 25 Dukes for joining.
Since then, he's posted three questions, each one
promising 5-10 Dukes, and never once awarded them.
His strategy seems to be to wave Dukes, ask his
hit-and-run question, and then bolt.
Answer his questions if you wish, but don't do it
expecting Dukes. - MODDuffy, you're getting just as cranky as I have. See what hanging around these forums does to oneself? :)

Question on Select query

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for