Questions re: Partitioning HD for OSX & OS9x

I have a Beige G3, MT, 300mhz, rev.1, with an 4GB Ultra SCSI Quantum Viking WSE that is basically a goner now. I bought a Seagate Ultra ATA/100 7200 RPM 160GB hard drive to replace it, and need a little advice about how to partition it. (bought the 160GB before I learned that, as an internal drive, my Beige will only see about 127GB - oh well, live and learn....).
For a while I need to continue to use OS9 for quite a few Apps & external devices. Also, I do a lot of graphic & web work so there's a lot of revising of files going on on my machine.
After browsing through the posts here, I still have some questions:
Q. Since my computer will only be seeing 127GBs out of 160, what happens to the rest of the "unseen" 33GBs? If, for instance, I format this drive today and then get a controller card or move it to a FW case later, what happens with the previously "unseen" GBs? Do they just get added on to the last partition? Will I have to reformat the whole drive again?
Q. Is it a good or bad idea to put the OS9 Classic system folder on a separate partition from OSX? What would be the pros or cons with this? (I plan on mostly using the regular OS9x on a separate partition for a lot of my Apps and such to avoid the conflicts with Classic that I've heard about, and until I get all my software & devices upgraded to OSX).
Q. I read some posts where some people don't think partitioning is a good idea, but since it looks like I'm going to have to do it anyway in order to install Tiger, I figured I would probably go ahead and partition the rest of the drive The list below might look like over-kill, but from what I've read, this type of set-up seems to minimize and confine disk fragmentation & corruption which seems to me to be a plus - any cons to this?
Q. Also, does this order of partitioning seem ok? (I came up with this configuration after reading some info at these sites: http://www.sciencequest.org/support/computers/mac/topics/partitioning.html and http://www.themacintoshguy.com/mactips/archive/tip11.shtml
Partition 1: 7.95GB - OSX (Tiger)
Partition 2: 10GB - Scratch Disk (for Photoshop scratch disk, scanner captures, burning CDs, downloading, browser cache, etc. - in essence, no files reside here).
Partition 3: 5GB - OS9x (original)
Partition 4: 5GB - OS9x Classic
Partition 5: 10GB - Temp/Work area (Unlike the "Scratch" partition, files/projects may reside until completed)
Partition 6: 50GB - Docs & Resource Library
Partition 7: 5GB - Email
Partition 8: 20GB - Apps
Partition 9: 7.95GB - Emergency OSX system, & OSX repair utilities (Disk Warrior, & Drive Genius).
Partition 10: 5GB - Emergency OS9 system, & OS9 repair utilities, (DW & Norton).
All recommendations, opinions and tips are greatly appreciated.
~Kathleen
Beige G3, MT, 300mhz, rev.1, model #M6572LLA,Ultra SCSI Quantum Viking 4.5 WSE   Mac OS 9.2.x   RAM=640MB, Apple53C875 SCSI Card, USB card, FW card, ATI mach64_3DU Display card

Kathleen:
The tech forum in the ExPostFacto site (http://forum.macsales.com/) has a number of extensive discussions about partitioning and recommendations. I suggest you look there for additional discussion by people with far more expertise than me.
I do remember a couple of points from my reading in that forum.
1) If things go awry in an attempted EPF installation, under certain conditions it can alter or cause problems in the System 9 being used at the time. Having a separate partition for a duolicate System 9 for EPF to use would protect your regular working system in the event of such a mishap.
I believe one recommendation indicated you could just drag and drop your existing System 9 from your internal drive onto a new partition, even on an external drive, in order to create such a separate System for EPF use.
2) You may wish to have a separate System 9 partition for use as a helper disk for EPF to use.
3) You may wish to have a separate System 9 partition to use for System X to designate as a classic environment.
4) You may wish other partitions for applications, data/documents, etc.
As I recall, most of the detailed recommendations (I believe I saw at least 3 different such messages during my travels at that site) included a first partition of >8GB for System X, two other separate partitions (several GB) for System 9, one for desigantion as classic mode under System X, the other for use by EPF in installing and also (if necessary) as a helper disk.
If I have recapitulated this information incorrectly I trust others will set you straight. In any event, I recommend you take a close look at the EPF tech forums - a search for partitioning should yield rapid results of very helpful information. Hope this helps - Good luck!
G3 Beige mini tower   Mac OS 9.1.x   Sonnet G4 800MHz upgrade; 640 MB RAM

Similar Messages

  • Partition problems for OSX upgrade! YIPES!!

    Hello,
    I have an original bondi blue imac with an upgraded 466mhz chip and a 40G harddrive. I have performed all of the tasks required to upgrade to OSX
    I have acquired the system on BLACK Cds (10.3.5)
    I have upgraded my firmware
    I have backed up my files
    I have partitioned the drive with one partition being 8G the other whatever is left.
    and THEN I have inserted the disk 1 into the drive and proceeded.
    but I was returned the message "neither of your partitions is in the first 8G of the drive" so I assumed that I had mistaken the picture and that the top was the end of the drive not the beginning so I repartitioned the drive and now when I puyt the disk 1 in and start again I just get two exclamation marks and cannot click either of them.
    what am I doing wrong?
    It has been such a long journey for me to get to this point I am pretty zen about it but I am getting closer and closer to FLIPPING OUTOUOUTOUTOU!!
    smiles
    and thanks for any help that you can give me!!
    kt
    iMac G3 bondi :: imac G5 isight   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    Make the first partition 7.8GB. The operative word is under 8 GB. You should be good-to-go from there.
    It's confusing!
    David

  • Best partition procedure for OSX speed

    When my new MBP comes in I want to partition the 320 drive into a 40 gig for Vista, a 30 gig for scratch, +/or alternate start up disc, and the rest for OS X and all my programs. When you start up the disc utility it does not say what partition is located in the fastest disc section. How can one be assured to put OS X into this partition location? Is it the top one or bottom on the disc partition set up screen?? Or maybe it will automatically be the largest partition?
    aehaas

    V.K. wrote:
    I wonder why one needs bootcamp assistant at all.
    For the same reason they need other assistants or "wizards": to simplify & make more convenient what could otherwise only be done with more complex methods that require greater technical knowledge or more time to do. Boot Camp Assistant provides "one stop shopping" for file system & other checks, step-by-step installation instructions, initial creation of the Windows partition, & setting the Windows installer disk as the startup disk. And like many other assistants, it does not offer all the possible options to keep things simple.
    KJK555 wrote:
    If you don't use boot camp, then generally you must reformat the partition when you install windows,
    but that is usually a moot point because most people prefer an NTFS file system and typically format
    the partition anyway.
    To be clear about it, you must use Boot Camp (which is primarily the set of drivers & other software that allow Windows to use the Mac's hardware) if you want a fully functional Windows environment, but you don't have to use Boot Camp Assistant to set up the installation. As for what file system most people prefer, it depends on the Windows version (don't use FAT32 for Vista!) & on whether or not users want to write to the Windows partition from OS X (OS X reads from but does not write to NTFS).
    The only time it
    be a real problem is if you wanted a fat32 partition larger than 32GB. ipartition can handle those
    chores though, ipartition allows you to shrink or expand msdos partitions.
    A FAT32 partition larger than 32 GB might be a problem in other respects. MS says larger ones encounter unacceptable slowness & inefficiencies, which is why (so the company says) that the Windows 2000 & later formatter program imposes that limit. Third party utilities can get around this, of course, but I believe fragmentation issues mitigate against everyday use of the larger FAT partitions.

  • How to partition 120 GB hard drive MacBook for OSX+Win (BC+Par.)? Fat/NFTS?

    After many happy years with my PowerBook G4 12" (I will miss it definitely, as compact and cute as it is ;-() I'll now switch to a new MacBook 2.16 GHz with 2 GB RAM and a 120 GB hard drive.
    I will have to use Windows (not yet sure if XP or Vista), as I need special software not available for the Mac, so my choice will be Parallels, so that I can work in Os X and at the same time use those Windows Apps I need.
    However, I also want to be able to boot Windows-only with BootCamp, so I already learned I have to install Windows on its own partition.
    So my question is:
    How shall I partition the hard drive?
    * If I have one big partition for OSX + documents and the rest (maybe 30 or 40 GB) for Windows, I won't be able to access my documents from Windows, right?
    * So I would have to keep the data I want to access from within Windows on a PC formatted partition (if I don't want to pay for a software like MacDrive)?
    Or can Windows running in Parallels read from a HFS partition?
    * Does this mean: if I want to access (read and write) my documents in OSX and Windows, I have to keep them on a Fat32 partition?
    -> This could be the partition where Windows is installed (but I'm not sure if I feel comfortable with that solution) of I would need a 3rd partition (Fat32) for data which would cause quite a big "segmentation" of the hard drive.
    How did you resolve this problem?
    Unfortunately, I don't see that I could really "separate" data I only have to access from Windows and those I only want to access in OS X, so in my opinion for me they all have to be in one place.
    Looking forward to your comments,
    Martin
    MacBook 2.16 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 120 GB HD (white)   Mac OS X (10.4.9)  

    You should probably ask all your Boot Camp quesitons in the Boot Camp discussions:
    http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1165
    And your Parallels questions in the Parallels forums:
    http://forums.parallels.com

  • Partitions for OSX and Win-XP, Photo Library and Scratchdisk

    Hello everybody,
    I have just received my 160GB hard disk for my MacBook, before installing it I have a question:
    I want to run OSX, and windows XPPro
    Within OSX I will be using Aperture
    Within the XPPro environment I will be using CS2
    Question 1.
    for the CS2 envrinment I want to partition a schratchdisk of appr. 20GB. Will I be able to use this schratchdisk from both OSX and XP depending on when I use them (I am also able to run CS2 from OSX)
    Question 2.
    I want to access a single photo library from both OSX and XPPro, do I make an extra partition for this as well ?
    I would be most pleased for any comments or alternative setups on partitioning.
    I will be using Bootcamp.
    Thanks in advance

    I would only partition for scratch disk and running XP. For iPhoto it is best if the pictures are on the same partition as the operating system as it makes it easier to backup your data as my FAQ explains
    http://www.macmaps.com/backup.html
    Before partitioning, be sure to backup your data at least twice, as partitioning may cause the drive to fail if there is anything wrong with it at the low level. Apple´s Boot Camp utility theoretically can partition without wiping the drive, and other methods of running XP on your MacBook may make their own virtual partition to run XP on which you can copy over to a formatted partition with the installer´s Disk Utility if you so desire, or you can keep on your main partition. This FAQ of mine explains what those methods of running XP on Intel Macs are
    http://www.macmaps.com/macosxnative.html#INTEL
    You may find though you don´t have to run XP at all. There are many more compatible Mac compatible titles than you might think which you can find in the above FAQ.

  • I want to partition an external device for OSX and Windows.  Opened Disk utility but Partition is not an option

    I want to partition an external drive for OSX and PC.  Went to Disk Utility but Partition is not an available option.

    Why not? does the partition tab not exist?

  • Enable Bootcamp to install from usb for OSX 10.9**WORKS**

    So basically, I have trying to install windows on my mbp using a usb drive. However bootcamp wont allow me to do so since I have a optical drive on the laptop. I have been searching for a long time and eventually came across this solution and I would like to share this so u guys dont have to google all over the place again .
    The solutions given before by changing info.plist is correct except that now Bootcamp crashes everytime you change it in OSX 10.9.
    Full solution:
    1. Add your Boot Rom Version(from system info) under DARequiredROMVersions.
    2. Add Model Identifier(from system info) under PreUSBBootSupportedModels
    3. Delete "Pre" from "PreUSBBootSupportedModels", so you have "USBBootSupportedModels"
    The first 3 steps are same as before and if its not clear you can easily google solutions with screenshots.
    The next step is only for OSX 10.9, as it employs some kind of code signature to prevent you from changing info.plist and cause bootcamp to crash.
    4. Open your terminal, use the following command
    sudo codesign -fs - /Applications/Utilities/Boot\ Camp\ Assistant.app
    Sudo means using administrator privilege and u need to enter your mac password. And the command resigns the bootcamp application so that it runs with the new info.plist file and not crash.
    5. Continue on with your installation....
    Cheers.
    P.S. back up info.plist before u change anything.

    do you have multiple partitions on your USB stick? And what partition table does it use?
    I have two windows installers. One is on a 4GB single partition fat32 formatted stick, and one is on a 5GB partitions of a 500GB USB HDD. On the USB HDD I have windows as second partition. First is OSX installer. I noticed that I can boot in BIOS mode with the 4GB USB stick, but not with the 500GB USB HDD.
    So try a windows formatted USB stick with a single partition. See if that works.
    Be carefull with google.. In the last few days I have been researching some bootcamp related things and there is waaaay more wrong information of people that tell others what they 'heard' than that there is right information of those who know how stuff works.
    I am of the 2nd category btw. I only tell you what I know for sure. If an '06 macbook with ODD can boot of of USB into BIOS mode, then so should you.
    Edit: The reason the Windows EFI installers says it found an MBR partition only is because by default the disk is in GPT mode with a 'protected' mbr so that non-gpt aware programs wont look and scream "free space! ".
    In order for Bootcamp to install in legacy BIOS mode it converts this 'protective' MBR into a "hybrid" MBR. If you download the open source app "Gdisk", install it, and type "sudo gdisk /dev/disk0" in terminal you will see there is either a protective or hybrid MBR on the disk.
    Formatting a disk to fat32 with any OSX tool (BC Utility or disk utility) will convert the protective MBR to Hybrid MBR.
    Gdisk allows you to reset this to a protective MBR as described here: http://superuser.com/questions/508026/windows-detects-gpt-disk-as-mbr-in-efi-boo t
    Hybrid MBR: Full Bootcamp compatibility. OSX knows whats up and decides everything. Windows installs in legacy BIOS mode on an MBR type disk.
    Protective MBR: Bootcamp utility and OSX are not used since they would convert the disk to a hybrid MBR. This mode is compatible with booting in EFI mode. EFI compatible Windows versions (7 partially, 8 completely) will live alongside OS X, for the most without problems. And will install on a GPT type disk.
    Hope to have helped you with this. Took me three full days of non-stop reading to figure this out.
    Message was edited by: Jognt
    Edit 2: Make damned sure you have a backup of your system. Messing around with partition types and tables shouldnt hurt when you know what you're doing. But since I know this for three days, and you apparently havent found this yet, I think it's safe to say both of us aren't yet 100% sure of what we're doing .
    Message was edited by: Jognt

  • Partition Affecting Mac OSX

    Hi, I had another question regarding partitioning. I have a new Macbook running 10.5.6, with 4 GB of RAM and 320 GB of hard drive space. I am planning to put Vista Ultimate on this computer, and I wanted to partition it 110 Windows, 210 Mac. The installation manual said I should make sure that this partition would not affect the OSX part of the partition. Is this an acceptable partition? Thanks.

    Hi and welcome to Discussions,
    110GB for Vista is more than acceptable.
    Usually I would propose something about 50 - 70GB for Vista.
    Make sure to always have about 10% free disk space on your OSX partition, otherwise OSX can slow down drastically and/or show some erratic behaviour.
    Take care
    Stefan

  • To Partition or Not to Partition - OS9 and OSX 10.3.9

    Hi Guys
    I just replaced my old G4 internal hard drive with a new Scorpio Black SATA 500 gig 7200 rpm SATA and a Firm Tech PCI card.
    My old drive had 2 partitions, the large one for OSX 10.3.9 and the smaller one for OS 9.2, which I don't use anymore.
    I tried to partition my new WD drive giving OS 9.2 only 20 gigs, and the rest to OSX 10.3.9. Well this new WD drive wouldn't let me give only 20 gigs to OS 9.2. It kept changing itself to 37 gigs. That's way to much space for just the few things I have stored on it.
    So, with that in mind, I only made 1 whole partition formatted to OS Extended Journaled. If I need to run OS 9, will I still be able to even though the drive is not formatted to OS Extended? What problems would I have, if any?
    Or do I need to partition these 2 operating systems? If so, is there a way to override that 37 gig minimum on the WD drive. By the way, that new WD drive will be my master drive.
    As always, thanks for your help.
    Best,
    Anneit

    Hi Tom
    Thank you for your response.
    You can have OS 9 on the same HD or partition as OS X without any problems.
    That's good. Thank you.
    What model G4 do you have?
    Here is my G4 model:
    Hardware Overview:
    Machine Model: Power Mac G4
    CPU Type: PowerPC G4 (2.1)
    Number Of CPUs: 1
    CPU Speed: 867 MHz
    L2 Cache (per CPU): 256 KB
    L3 Cache (per CPU): 2 MB
    Memory: 1.5 GB
    Bus Speed: 133 MHz
    Boot ROM Version: 4.2.5f1
    Serial Number: XB136*KSK
    Sales Order Number: M8*LL/A
    Now I'm have a huge problem. It looks like a have a kernel panic. When I start up I get a little question mark for a couple of seconds, then I get the smily face but then I get a kernel panic. Yick!
    Here's what I had done before this happend:
    - While my old hard drive was still in my G4, I cloned it to my new drive, the Western Digital SATA with the PCI card attached to it, using super duper.
    - So then, I removed my old drive.
    It is my understanding that the black end of the grey drive cable is for a master drive, and the 2 grey ends are for slave drives. Correct? So now the black end is not connected to the new drive. (It doesn't fit anyway.) I just assumed that the PCI card is taking care of this. However, I could be wrong.
    I checked the top of the new drive and it said "Master/Slave Jumper Not Required for SATA". So how does it know that the new drive is a master. Could that be the problem?
    Could the problem be that it doesn't see a master drive? Am I missing something?
    By the way, I have 2 other Internal Western Digital drives also in my machine. They have been working just fine.
    Please help.
    Best,
    Anneita

  • Mac Pro - Separate HD for OSX and Windows?

    Hello Mac Pro users - maybe some of you can help...
    Are going to buy a Mac Pro soon - which will be used for graphic artwork and Windows games. Today I have a Mac and a PC - for the same purpose - and now I want to build the Mac Pro with a harddisk for OSX - and another harddisk for Windows (XP or Vista). Is it possible to have 2 separate HD's (or more) with each systems using the standard setup by Bootcamp - or do I have to make a partition on the OSX HD and then install Windows there?
    I'm asking this pro forum because I can't get a clear answer here in Denmark where I live - a Apple supplier first said it was impossible - then 2 days later, that it was possible, but they will charge me for 2 hours of support - and in another forum some have told me it was easy - but have given me no help how to do it - and again some have told me to use some software called "rEFIt".
    So is it possible - and hard to do?
    If possible, please tell me in steps how to do...
    BR FLASH

    Boot Camp will allow you to
    utilise an entire disk for Windows. If you go to the
    Boot Camp web page you can actually see it in a
    picture…
    http://www.apple.com/bootcamp/
    The only thing you need to be wary of is that the
    Boot Camp Assistant will not wrok from a Mac OS X
    installation that is on a RAID set. As long as you
    boot mac OS X from a single drive then it's really
    easy.
    I had a setup for awhile of two drives in RAID-0 for my Startup drive, a backup single drive, and a separate 300GB drive just for Windows.
    In Windows the "Startup" drive in Control Panel would not show the RAID-0 Startup volume, but I could startup from it by hitting Option when it rebooted.
    Steve

  • Best partitioning strategy for OS 8.6?

    Hello,
    I have two hard drives on my beige 233 MHz G3 minitower (rev 1):
    4 GIG SCSI
    80 GIG ATA
    I need to install OS 8.6. I was considering using both drives but I do not know what I should put on each drive.
    Should I install OS 8.6 onto the 4 GIG drive or the 80 GIG drive?
    Option 1:
    4 GIG: OS 8.6
    80 GIG: applications
    Option 2:
    4 GIG drive: don't use it at all
    80 GIG drive: OS 8.6 and the applications
    Option 3 (using partitioning):
    4 GIG drive: don't use it at all
    80 GIG drive: First partition (15 GIGS): OS 8.6 and the applications. Second partition: (65 GIGs) for data.
    Unfortunately 4 GIGs is too small for all my applications and so that is why I was thinking of not even using the 4 GIG drive and instead putting everything onto the 80 GIG drive. I have heard it is a good idea to keep the system and apps on the same volume - I am not sure if this is always true however.
    Any thoughts?
    Thanks!
    The other issue is that I might have to further partition the 80 GIG drive into an additional partition for OSX in case I also need to install OSX because I read somewhere that on a beige G3, OSX must be installed in a partition that is no larger than 8 GIGs and it must be the first partition.
    This scenario would look like this:
    Option 4 (using more partitioning):
    4 GIG: don't use it at all
    80 GIG:
    First partition (7.9 GIGS): OS X and OS X applications
    Second partition (15 GIGS): OS 8.6 and the applications
    Third partition: (57 GIGs) for data.
    (I created a separate realted post under older hardware/beige G3/usage regarding how to boot between OS 8.6 and OS X in case anyone is interested.)

    Thanks Don and Jim,
    I carefully considered all your comments and here's what I plan to do:
    It is important for me to indicate that, for this beige G3, I will use OSX primarily (OS 10.1.5) and therefore I would like its partition to be as large as possible. I read this will benefit OSX's swap file needs. However the OS must be within the 7.7 GIG limit for this particular mac (beige G3). I can therefore conclude that I should make the first partition exactly 7.7 GIGs and use it only for OSX.
    Jim, you say that the 8 GIG limit for the startup volume applies to all OSes not just OSX and so that is a critical point for me. I will need to be certain about this. Are you sure OS 8.6 isn't bootable if it is in another partition beyond the first 8 GIGS on a beige G3? You see, I was thinking of installing OS 8.6 on a second partition of the 80 GIG drive like this:
    partition 1 (7.7 GIGs): OSX
    partition 2: (15 GIGs) : OS 8.6 and its applications
    Based on your comment (the 8 GIG limit for the startup volume applies to all OSes) this will not work - the OS 8.6 partition will never boot because it is not within the first 8 GIGs. I had thought that rule only applied to OSX.
    And if so, the best solution is to put OS 8.6 on the 4 GIG drive instead.
    Here is my final solution:
    4 GIG drive:
    OS 8.6 (plus maybe photoshop)
    80 GIG drive:
    partition 1 (7.7 GIGs): OSX (10.1.5 is the version I have)
    partition 2: (about 67 GIGs) : all the OSX applications, all the OS 8.6 applications and all my data
    partition 3 (5 GIGS) : scratch disk just for running photoshop in OS 8.6 (I may or may not create this last partition - still thinking about it)
    I might consider putting one or two of my OS 8.6 applications on the 4 GIG drive - the higher end applications such as photoshop which I think might fit on the 4 GIG drive with the OS 8.6.
    As for the 5 GIG scratch partition on the 80 GIG drive, I am still considering if I need to do this or not because I would rarely use it - only for the few times I might run photoshop in OS 8.6. Maybe I should keep this partition anyways for something else just in case.
    Other less important notes:
    I might, one day, be able to use OS 9 instead of OS8.6 in these examples, in which case I will just substitute 9 for 8.6 in my examples noted above. Howwever for now I am reserving OS 9 for another computer I have. As for classic, I don't need classic support. I would rather just boot directly into 9. I have used classic before and I found it to be slow.
    Thanks Jim and Don for your help.
    If anyone sees anything wrong with this setup please let me know!

  • Some pages don't render properly after Java update for OSX 10.6.8

    I can't seem to get T-mobile.com's website pages to render properly anymore. So far, this is the only website I'm having this issue with, though there could be more I'm not aware of.
    I go to www.t-mobile.com and this is what I get:
    I think I might be missing a plug-in, but not sure; if so, I don't know which one or how to get it.
    This only started happening after the latest Java update for OSX 10.6.8, which I installed on Feb. 24, 2013. All of T-mobile's pages look like this, except if I go to www.my.t-mobile.com's home page. Then I get a normal page, but after I log in, I get more wierd rendering issues again. So here's the page that appeared normal today:
    And after I log in successfully, I'm back to the wierd rendering issues again:
    I was so lost but then I decided to try a work around to get my online bill and managed to get it, but I don't want to see the pages like this. So help please?

    So, here's more on my point...
    I put in the 3 captured screen shots in my original post above. I used Grab to copy the web pages, saved them to my desktop as .tiff files and dropped them in for others to view. This morning, I went to look at my post and instead of seeing the screen shots, I see 3 tiny blue boxes with question marks. When I left click on the boxes, nothing happens. When I right click on them, I get options that are not helpful:
    Open Image in New Window
    Open Image in New Tab
    Download Image
    Copy Image Address
    Import Image
    Capture Selection from Screen
    Convert Selected Traditional Chinese Text (why the frack is this an option?)
    Convert Selected Simplified Chinese Text (or this an option?)
    I checked my Safari Preferences and I see I have checked, under Security, Enable plug-ins, Enable Java, Enable JavaScript.I have to have Java enabled to run a few things.
    Did something get corrupted in Safari?
    Am I'm missing some plug-ins?
    How do I get them back?
    I'm going to search the internet. Well, after doing the search, I still don't think I've got what I need. Thinking I might need to reinstall Safari. If this is the case, will I loose all my Bookmarks?

  • Partitioning Tips for Most Effective Usage

    Hi guys,
    I'm running on Snow Leopard with 4GB DDR3. I'm hoping I'll be able to get some advice here on how i should fully utilise my MBP's hard drive.
    I recently bought a new 500GB Samsung HDD but I've yet to install it cos I'm still pondering on what type of partitioning scheme i should stick to. I use my MBP as a workhorse. I do photography, design with photoshop, video editing, recording and gaming (with windows). From time to time i work with large transfers of files in and out, like we're talking GB here.. There are also 2 other people in my family who use this com, but just from time to time, transfer pictures and sync their iphones etc. I'm aware that too many partitions can also slow down the system, but this time round, im really certain i'd wanna partition my mac after a tragic crash of my os x partition hdd. It wasn't the HD's fault tho as my bootcamp partition survived.
    Anyway, how many partitions is too much and how should i partition my new drive to effectively use it? I've been reading quite a bit around the internet and so far from what i've gathered, im thinking of the following scheme:
    1) Primary Boot ROM - System and Applications (150GB)
    From my experience some apps like Final Cut Studio and Logic Studio 9 can take up as much as 56 GB each, Adobe CS5 takes up quite a bit too.
    2) Emergency Boot - For emergencies (15GB)
    System files and essentials like Alsoft Disk Warrior 4 and Data Recovery 3 in the event of nasty crashes for damage control/rescue
    3) Windows Partition - For Windows 7 and Games (100GB)
    Games like Modern Warfare 2 and Fallout 3 can take up to 15GB etc,
    4) Data Files (Remaining).
    What do ya'll think?
    More Questions I'd like to raise are:
    1) Would you think it would be better to create a partition, just for installing hugeass apps (ala logic and fc) and does anyone know if they can be installed on the non boot roms? eg if im using my primary startup partition, can i install logic on another partition which doesn't have Mac OS X on it?
    2) Should my Video, Audio and photography workfiles be in separate partitions or would it be more advisable to just keep them together?
    3) Should there be a partition just for temporary file storage like if im moving 50gb of data?
    4) How about video capturing? Recording sessions and post production project files? Should they be in a partitions of their own?
    5) I've read about scratch/swap partitions, what are they and are they advisable to have? Especially cos the stuff i do are pretty resource intensive.
    6) Should the different users be on different partitions?
    I guess that's about all the questions on my mind for now..
    Would greatly appreciate your help before i plan out and partition
    Thanks in advance!

    @Kappy,
    I'm sorry! Nono don't get me wrong.. I'm not shutting out your advises. I'm just in a dilemma as there seems to be 2 opposing camps: people who swear by partitioning and those against it. I read that a lotta people in the media industry, ie sound engineers who do recording on the go/designers who do huge projects highly recommend the practice of partitioning as huge amoutns of time are spent on each project, so they'd rather be safe than sorry.
    On the otherhand, people here are saying there's no need to do so/it sounds illogical.. I'm just wondering why.. I mean, i understand its gonna be a hassel and all, but is it not advantageous to to do so especially in times of adversity?
    About rEFIt, understand that the point of the article was aimed at being a tutorial at creating a multiple booting computer. However one of the steps pointed out was that we could create multiple partitions before installing Windows in just one partition. If that can be done, wouldn't it mean that instead of creating multiple boot partitions , i can create storage partitions as well, by selecting the appropriate kind of disk formats, which technically bypasses the limit of Bootcamp's 2 partition only policy.. Do you think that would be possible? PS: im not looking to install Windows on an external drive..
    About the emergency disk,
    I fully agree with you that ideal is to have it on an external drive, which i definitely have been practicing. However cos of my recent crashing, i figured that data recovery from my external usb harddrive indeed help, but was quite a slow process (yea.. i know firewire's the fastest option! heh), but im just wondering, any idea if booting from a good partition would be faster than one from an external hd/usb stick?
    OS X is structured to expect data/documents to be stored in their appropriate folders on the startup volume. This i do agree, do you think there are ways to re route them?
    Video, Audio and photography workfiles might best be kept on another hard drive, preferably FW800 for speed.Yea this i definitely agree that it would be the ideal, however i bring my mac out for live recordings sometimes using a firewire interface. My mbp has only 1 firewire interface tho, so an ext firewire HD wouldnt be an option.. and if i can avoid bringing along an external drive, that would too be great.
    Your tip on backing-up with a dedicated large external HD that i do agree fully and couldn't disagree less! In fact that's what i'm practicing. The RAID box is a wonderful idea actually! So thanks! (:
    @Michael Black
    Thanks for your answers to #5 and #6.. !
    Everyone, thanks for your responses so far! (:

  • WHAT IS THE BEST ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE FOR OSX YOSEMITE?

    WHAT IS THE BEST ANTIVIRUS SOFTWARE FOR OSX YOSEMITE?

    Here are some more thoughts to consider.
    There will always be threats to your information security associated with using any Internet - connected communications tool:
    You can mitigate those threats by following commonsense practices
    Delegating that responsibility to software is an ineffective defense
    Assuming that any product will protect you from those threats is a hazardous attitude that is likely to result in neglecting point #1 above.
    OS X already includes everything it needs to protect itself from viruses and malware. Keep it that way with software updates from Apple.
    A much better question is "how should I protect my Mac":
    Never install any product that claims to "clean up", "speed up",  "optimize", "boost" or "accelerate" your Mac; to "wash" it, "tune" it, or to make it "shiny". Those claims are absurd.Such products are very aggressively marketed. They are all scams.
    Never install pirated or "cracked" software, software obtained from dubious websites, or other questionable sources.
    Illegally obtained software is almost certain to contain malware.
    "Questionable sources" include but are not limited to spontaneously appearing web pages or popups, download hosting sites such as C net dot com, Softonic dot com, Soft pedia dot com, Download dot com, Mac Update dot com, or any other site whose revenue is primarily derived from junk product advertisements.
    If you need to install software that isn't available from the Mac App Store, obtain it only from legitimate sources authorized by the software's developer.
    Don’t supply your password in response to a popup window requesting it, unless you know what it is and the reason your credentials are required.
    Don’t open email attachments from email addresses that you do not recognize, or click links contained in an email:
    Most of these are scams that direct you to fraudulent sites that attempt to convince you to disclose personal information.
    Such "phishing" attempts are the 21st century equivalent of a social exploit that has existed since the dawn of civilization. Don’t fall for it.
    Apple will never ask you to reveal personal information in an email. If you receive an unexpected email from Apple saying your account will be closed unless you take immediate action, just ignore it. If your iCloud, iTunes, or App Store account becomes disabled for valid reasons, you will know when you try to buy something or log in to this support site, and are unable to.
    Don’t install browser extensions unless you understand their purpose. Go to the Safari menu > Preferences > Extensions. If you see any extensions that you do not recognize or understand, simply click the Uninstall button and they will be gone.
    Don’t install Java unless you are certain that you need it:
    Java, a non-Apple product, is a potential vector for malware. If you are required to use Java, be mindful of that possibility.
    Java can be disabled in System Preferences.
    Despite its name JavaScript is unrelated to Java. No malware can infect your Mac through JavaScript. It’s OK to leave it enabled.
    Beware spontaneous popups: Safari menu > Preferences > Security > check "Block popup windows".
    Popup windows are useful and required for some websites, but unsolicited popups are commonly used to deceive people into installing unwanted software they would never intentionally install.
    Popups themselves cannot infect your Mac, but many contain resource-hungry code that will slow down Internet browsing.
    If you ever receive a popup window indicating that your Mac is infected with some ick or that you won some prize, it is 100% fraudulent. Ignore it.
    The same goes for a spontaneously appearing dialog insisting that you upgrade your video player right this instant. Such popups are frequently associated with sites that promise to deliver movies or other copyrighted content that is not normally "free".
    The more insistent it is that you upgrade or install something, the more likely it is to be a scam. Close the window or tab and forget it.
    Ignore hyperventilating popular media outlets that thrive by promoting fear and discord with entertainment products arrogantly presented as "news". Learn what real threats actually exist and how to arm yourself against them:
    The most serious threat to your data security is phishing. Most of these attempts are pathetic and are easily recognized, but that hasn't stopped prominent public figures from recently succumbing to this age-old scam.
    OS X viruses do not exist, but intentionally malicious or poorly written code, created by either nefarious or inept individuals, is nothing new.
    Never install something without first knowing what it is, what it does, how it works, and how to get rid of it when you don’t want it any more.
    If you elect to use "anti-virus" software, familiarize yourself with its limitations and potential to cause adverse effects, and apply the principle immediately preceding this one.
    Most such utilities will only slow down and destabilize your Mac while they look for viruses that do not exist, conveying no benefit whatsoever - other than to make you "feel good" about security, when you should actually be exercising sound judgment, derived from accurate knowledge, based on verifiable facts.
    Do install updates from Apple as they become available. No one knows more about Macs and how to protect them than the company that builds them.
    Summary: Use common sense and caution when you use your Mac, just like you would in any social context. There is no product, utility, or magic talisman that can protect you from all the evils of mankind.

  • Unrecognized partition table for drive 80 error??

    Currently running leopard on a macbook pro.
    Formatted w bootcamp and running Windows Vista Ultimate.
    Installation went fine reformated drive to ntfs 45gigs.
    But when booting into windows I get this error message
    "unrecognized partition table for drive 80"
    Then the system boots into vista as normal but that error message is annoying.
    Tells me to fix bootmgr using fdisk. How do I do that?
    Thanks.

    I previously had Vista installed under the beta with Tiger and there was no issues at all regarding boot times or error messages. (Boot times being quite nippy considering)
    I did reformat the hard drive space partitioned in side Vista installation as NTFS. As I am only a switcher for a year or so I imagine there may be something I am missing but given the text when I try to boot into Vista, it looks to be the boot loader that is erroring and that looks the same as a GRUB loader failing.
    I just do not get why a BETA product would work fine, then after a fresh installation of the new Mac OSX 10.5 with the final version of boot camp I would receive errors like this.
    I have reclaimed the hard drive space and split the disk again but the same error persists. Previously I was showing off my Macbook to work mates showing how it handled Windows as well as the user friendly OSX. Now all I can show them is a 5 minute loading screen full of non booting Vista as they look at me like some kind of idiot. (Which depending on who you ask is possibly correct)

Maybe you are looking for