R-Tree Indexing

Hi.
Is it possible to direct in which tablespace the R-tree index table will go.
I know that you have a tablespace parameter in creating a quadtree index but I can't find one when creating the R-tree index.
I'm using Oracle 8.1.7
Johan

An index entry is created in the SYSTEM tablespace but the spatial indices are created in the tablespace you specify. To verify it execute the following:
select table_name,tablespace_name
from user_tables
where table_name like 'spatial_table%';
It will return your table_name plus the spatial index table created for it.
The table_name will look something like this:
spatial_table_SX_FL10$ for fixed quad tree and spatial_table_RT$ for rtree.
You can query the same for the indexes built on that previous table.
select index_name,tablespace_name
from user_indexes
where table_name = 'SPATIAL_TABLE_SX_FL10$';
The two index names would look like:
spatial_table_sx_fl10$B1
spatial_table_sx_fl10$B2
They should be created in the tablespace specified in the tablespace parameter when creating the spatial index.
Does that help any?
Dave
null

Similar Messages

  • Bitmap index Vs B-Tree index

    Hi All,
    Could some one please let me know how Bitmap indexes are useful compared to B-Tree indexes on low-cardinality columns ?.
    Thanks,
    -Kumar.

    >>
    As Re: why oracle db 9i optimizer can't choose to use the bitmap index? there are a number of issues with bitmap indexes. Your best bet is to read these three articles by Jonathan Lewis.
    It does pay us to understand how the optimizer works with bitmap indexes. I posted some Re: Cost-based optimizer behavior to show how indexes on even very low valued columns can be useful in certain circumstances.
    Cheers, APC
    Blog : http://radiofreetooting.blogspot.com/

  • Error in updating R-tree index

    Hi,
    I want to update a geometry column with a R-tree index on it with a statement like:
    update xxx set xxx.geometry = (select yyy.geometry...
    All geometries in the updated table are NULL before. I get the following error:
    ORA-29877: failed in the execution of the ODCIINDEXUPDATE routine
    ORA-13237: internal error during R-tree concurrent updates: [empty-node
    encountered; rebuild index]
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 7
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_IDX", line 86
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD", line 83
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    What's wrong?
    Joerg

    Joerg,
    This is a known bug in R-tree indexing.
    When you create an R-tree index
    on a table with no geometries, it gives
    this error.
    This is fixed in 8.1.7.
    To get around this problem, make sure
    that atleast one geometry is non-null
    when you create the index.
    For a performance reason, it is not
    recommended that you create
    index on spatial table with NULL
    geometries.
    Updates on such indexed table will
    be very expensive compared to
    creating the index on a fully
    populated table.
    null

  • How to get the tree index of a child node

    Hi, I am loading a tree object from an XML source file (via
    an XMLListCollection)
    I can find the children on the currently selected node, like:
    var children:XMLList =
    XMLList(myTree.selectedItem).children();
    for(var i:Number=0; i < children.length(); i++) {
    trace("Child Found: " + children
    .@caption);
    But how can I determine the tree index for each of the
    children? I would like to be able to grab and save the tree index
    for each child, so that I can later just to do
    "myTree.selectedIndex = (saved child index) (based on some form
    action the user performs). I can't find any method of determining
    what the tree index for a child is, other than walking down the
    tree from the parent node and counting the number of nodes till I
    hit each child. Is there a simple method?

    Tree is hierarchical, index is linear. I have never seen
    anyone successfully use selectedIndex with Tree.
    You best bet is to put an id on each node and use e4x
    expression to find that node when you want.
    Tracy

  • Oracle Spatial 8.1.7 r-tree indexes

    I don't think this problem is specific to r-tree indexes vs. quad-tree.
    Even though I specify a tablespace other than the SYSTEM tablespace in Oracle Spatial Index Advisor when creating r-tree indexes, the index is still created in the SYSTEM tablespace. I don't want my spatial indexes in the SYSTEM tablespace!
    select tablespace_name from user_indexes where index_name = 'GPS_IDX';
    TABLESPACE_NAME
    SYSTEM
    Here is the sql statement that Spatial Index Advisor constructed:
    create index gis.gps_idx on gis.gps (geometry) indextype is mdsys.spatial_index parameters ('sdo_indx_dims=2');
    I was not able to issue this sql from worksheet with the tablespace option added. Is there a way to do that?
    In Spatial Index Advisor, if I don't select the geometry column, then the sql is constructed with the tablespace option added, but when I select the geometry column, it removes it from the sql.
    Can anybody shed some light on how to do this?
    thanks
    Dave

    Spatial creates an index entry in the system tablespace but realy creates the spatial index in the tablespace you gave it. To verify it execute the select:
    select table_name,tablespace_name
    from user_tables
    where table_name like 'spatial_table%';
    It will return your table_name plus the spatial index table created for it.
    The table_name will look something like this:
    spatial_table_SX_FL10$.
    spatial_tables beeing your spatial table.
    You can query the same for the indexes built on that previous table.
    select index_name,tablespace_name
    from user_indexes
    where table_name = 'SPATIAL_TABLE_SX_FL10$';
    The two index names would look like:
    spatial_table_sx_fl10$B1
    spatial_table_sx_fl10$B2
    They should be created in the tablespace mentionned in your tablespace clause when creating the spatial index.
    Hope this helps

  • Migrate B-Tree Indexes of XML O-R Table to XMLIndex on Binary XML Table

    We need slight help on how to migrate existing B-TREE Indexes from XML Obj-Rel Tables to XMLIndex on new XML Binary Tables
    We use searches on Nested Collection Elements (defined unbounded in XSD)
    and related DDL for XML Obj-Rel Tables is shown below:
    CREATE TABLE TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML
    AGREEMENT_XML xmltype,
    CREATE_BY     VARCHAR2(15) NULL ,
    CREATE_DT_GMT     TIMESTAMP NULL ,
    CREATE_CLIENT_ID VARCHAR2(65) NULL ,
    UPDATE_BY     VARCHAR2(15) NULL ,
    UPDATE_DT_GMT     TIMESTAMP NULL ,
    UPDATE_CLIENT_ID VARCHAR2(65) NULL ,
    PIC_VERSION_NUM     NUMBER(20) NULL
    XMLTYPE COLUMN AGREEMENT_XML XMLSCHEMA "AB_Agreement_V1_XMLDB.xsd" ELEMENT "Agreement"
    VARRAY AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."SHIPPING_PARTY_GROUPS"
    STORE AS TABLE SHIPPING_PARTY_GROUPS_NT
    (PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX) ENABLE)
    VARRAY SHIPPING_PARTIES
    STORE AS TABLE SHIPPING_PARTIES_NT
    (PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX) ENABLE)
    VARRAY AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."SALES_OFFICE_CODES"."STRING_WRAPPERS"
    STORE AS TABLE SALES_OFFICE_CODES_NT
    (PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX) ENABLE)
    TABLESPACE TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_DATA;
    Table has PK and Unique Index which for the Binary XML Table, it will be setup on Virtual Columns (to enforce
    Unique Constraints)
    We have 6 more Normal Indexes on this Table, some created on Nested Elements as shown below:
    -- 4 Normal B-TREE Indexes on Leaf level Elements
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_IDX1 on TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML (AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."AGREEMENT_VERSION")
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_IDX2 on TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML (AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."LAST_UPDATED_BY")
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_IDX3 on TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML (AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."LAST_UPDATED")
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_IDX4 on TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML (AGREEMENT_XML.XMLDATA."CREATION_DATE")
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    --2 Indexes created on Nested Table (Collection)
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_NT_IDX1 on SALES_OFFICE_CODES_NT NT(NT.STR_VAL, NT.NESTED_TABLE_ID)
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    create index TNMAB_AGREEMENT_XML_NT_IDX2 on SHIPPING_PARTIES_NT NT(NT.CUSTOMER_HOLDER.SAP_ID, NT.NESTED_TABLE_ID)
    tablespace TNMAB_XMLDB_ME_INDX;
    Could you please let us know how we should migrate above Indexes to XMLIndex format.
    Specifically, not sure how the last 2 Indexes on Nested Tables is to be defined.
    Any help or resources pointing to this would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks for the help,
    Auro

    Can't tell due to using XMLDATA pseudocolumn. Would need a sample XML document structure that can be used to define the XPATH structure and ALSO need the database version you are using (ALL digits) to see if you would need / can use STRUCTURED or UNSTRUCTURED XMLINDEX indexes.
    See the XML Index section (http://www.liberidu.com/blog/?page_id=441) on for guidance and/or of course the XMLDB Developers Guide for your database version
    http://www.liberidu.com/blog/?page_id=441
    XMLIndex (part 1) – The Concepts
    XMLIndex (Part 2) – XMLIndex Path Subsetting
    XMLIndex (Part 3) – XMLIndex Syntax Dissected
    XMLIndex Performance and Fuzzy XPath Searches
    Structured XMLIndex (Part 1) – Rules of Numb
    Structured XMLIndex (Part 2) – Howto build a structured XMLIndex
    Structured XMLIndex (Part 3) – Building Multiple XMLIndex Structures

  • ERROR BUILDING SPATIAL R-TREE INDEX

    I tried building an R-tree index on a spatial table containing latitude/longitude points. There are only 9000 records in the table.
    I get the following error:
    ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
    ORA-13200: internal error [Unsupported Type] in spatial indexing.
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD_9I", line 7
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    Can anyone help?

    MY ORACLE version number is 9.0.1.0.0
    My table name is GEOM_FIX, the column that I tried to index is FIX_NAME VARCHAR2, where FIX_NAME is a unique identifier.
    My spatial index create script is:
    CREATE INDEX NDX_GEOM_FIX ON GEOM_FIX (FIX_NAME)
    INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX

  • R-tree indexing: really 3d now?

    Dear all,
    after studying the Spatial Reference guide for 11g I am left wondering what the story is with the R-tree index. Does it really consider all three dimensions now? And all you have to do is set the sdo_indx_dims to 3. Does anyone know another reference about this index apart from the spatial reference guide?
    Thanks,
    B.

    Check this link for a similar discussion
    Re: SDO_RELATE with 3D geometry
    The second edition of Pro Oracle Spatial has a good bit of detail on 11g 3d:
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/Oracle-Spatial-Database-Experts-Voice/dp/1590598997/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1225907677&sr=8-1

  • R-Tree Index v's Quadtree Index

    Hi,
    In the 8.1.7 spatial documentation it says that R-Tree index may not be a good choice for a geometry table that has heavy update activity.
    Can anyone define and quantify what heavy update is?
    Thanks

    There hasn't been a formal analysis of R-tree update performance. Some things that are known:
    The spatial index create statement includes a percent free specification that allows free space to remain in the R-tree to accomodate future inserts.
    If the data doesn't need to be kept on-line all the time, then the R-tree index can be rebuilt.
    The performance associated with both R-tree index updates and quadtree index updates is dependent on the data being inserted. Updating point data seems to be faster with quadtrees. Updating simple geometries also seems to be faster with quadtrees. There is a point though where tiling complicated geometries dominates the quadtree index update time, and at some point of complexity it becomes faster to update R-tree indexes.
    If anyone has info to add here it would be quite useful.
    Hope this helps,
    dan

  • R-tree index creation error

    I'm getting the following error when trying to create an r-tree index:
    create index new_gps_idx on gis.new_gps (geometry) indextype is mdsys.spatial_index PARAMETERS('TABLESPACE=INDX')
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
    ORA-06512: at line 1
    I get the error regardless of which tablespace I specify.
    I can however create fixed quad-tree indexes with the following command, in the same tablespace:
    create index new_gps_idx on gis.new_gps (geometry) indextype is mdsys.spatial_index PARAMETERS('SDO_LEVEL=4');
    The error is defined as:
    ORA-29855 error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCREATE routine
    Cause: Failed to successfully execute the ODCIIndexCreate routine.
    Action: Check to see if the routine has been coded correctly.
    I have created one r-tree index on a large spatial table, 5633 geometries, in the INDX tablespace. I am not able to create another one.
    The INDX tablespace is only 2% used and its size is 200MB.
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Dave
    null

    Hi David,
    Can you try applying the patch (if you haven't already)? Unfortunately I can't rememeber the details of what the symptoms were, and although the patch kit describes a fix there is no corresponding bug in Oracle's bug database. If I remember correctly there was a bug in the values the r-tree code was using for intermediate (temporary) tables created during r-tree index creation.
    Sorry I can't pin this down for you.
    dan

  • TT0885: Invalid T-tree index

    After running for several days, our TimesTen 6.0.4 returns errors: TT0885: Invalid T-tree index
    What is wrong? How can we fix this?
    The error was first encountered when monitoring a table size:
    /opt/TimesTen/myapp/bin/ttSize -tbl mydb.users -connstr "dsn=myDB;uid=***;pwd=***"
    Rows = 1787180
    Table in-line row bytes = 178192657
    Indexes:
    Can't get info on index FIRST_INDX.MYDB: TT0885: Invalid T-tree index -- file "index.c", lineno 8243, procedure "sb_ixInfo ()"
    Can't get info on index SECOND_INDX.MYDB: TT0885: Invalid T-tree index -- file "index.c", lineno 8243, procedure "sb_ixInfo ()"
    T-tree index MYDB.UID_INDX adds 36313369 bytes
    Can't get info on index USER_INDX.MYDB: TT0885: Invalid T-tree index -- file "index.c", lineno 8243, procedure "sb_ixInfo ()"
    Total index bytes = 36313369
    Total = 214506026

    Hi,
    As I suspected. Using ttSize in this manner is not that useful since it does not measure./report on a tables actual space utilisation but rather it computes an 'estimated' utilisation based on the schema, indexes and rowcount. The calculations it use have to make certain assumptions about various things so the values returned may in some cases differ significantly from 'reality'. There is currently no exact way to determine the actual memory occupied by a specific table or index. However, there are accurate figures available about overall memory utiliation in the datastore. The SYS.MONITOR table includes fields such as PERM_ALLOCATED_SIZE, PERM_IN_USE_SIZE and PERM_IN_USE_HIGH_WATER plus equivalent fields for the TEMP region. Also, there is a useful built in procedure called ttBlockInfo.
    I would strongly recommend that any routine space monitoring scheme be based on these rather than ttSize...
    Chris

  • Urgent help needed : Error while creating r-tree index

    Hi All:
    When i try to create an rtree index on a multipolygon layer am getting the following error . Am using the following statement:
    CREATE INDEX SYSTEM.TEST_IDX ON SYSTEM.TEST("GEOMETRY) INDEXTYPE IS MDSYS.SPATIAL_INDEX PARAMETERS ('SDO_INDX_DIMS=2')
    java.sql.SQLException: ORA-29855: error occurred in the execution of ODCIINDEXCR
    EATE routine
    ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kope2upic954], [], [], [], [], [], [
    Best Regards
    Debasish Sahu

    Hi,
    There is something wrong with the data as you loaded it.
    Can you try to validate the geometries?
    Thanks,
    d

  • R-Tree Index becomes invalid

    Hi,
    I've a index that becomes invalid almost every day. I get the error message
    ORA-29902: error in executing ODCIIndexStart() routine
    ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA view
    ORA-13203: failed to read USER_SDO_GEOM_METADATA view
    ORA-29400: data cartridge error
    ORA-01013: user requested cancel of current operation
    ORA-06512: at "MDSYS.SDO_INDEX_METHOD_10I", line 286
    after rebuilding the index everything works fine again.
    Does anybody know a solution on that problem?
    Peter

    Is there a nightly process that is causing things to change? I think we need more info to be able to help you.
    Is it possible that this index is in a different tablespace and backups aren't shutting them down/bringing them back up in the right order?
    Any manner of things could cause this, beyond the Oracle bug for spatial indexes in 10G, with large number of records. Ours handle this fine night after night, so something must be causing your data to change or affecting the index.
    What happens every night, or at the end of the day that could be affecting it?

  • Which index to use?

    I have a table containing large complete 2D polygons (State and county boundaries). Each row in the table represents an entire polygon rather than a linestring section of a polygon.
    There are a large number of vertices in each polygon - some rows have over 100,000 entries in the SDO_ORDINATE_ARRAY.
    What sort of index should I use to maximise the performance?
    I am currently using Fixed Tile Quadtree indexing with an SDO_LEVEL of 6.
    Would R-Tree or Hybrid indexing suit such a geometry better?

    Hi,
    It depends on which version of Oracle Spatial you are using.
    As of Oracle 9i, the recommendation is to use R-tree indexes (they are easy to
    create, there is no tuning, their performance is nearly always as good or better
    than quadtree indexes, they can be geodetic, there is functionality only supported
    when using R-tree indexes). There are still a few cases where quadtrees have
    better performance, but R-tree indexes are getting better all the time.
    In earlier versions, there are a lot of cases where quadtrees are better suited to do some
    kinds of queries.
    Oracle doesn't recommend using hybrid quadtree indexes.
    If you are having performance problems, you might want to use spatial index advisor
    to help you determine a good indexing level for a quadtree index.

  • Multi-column BITMAP index vs. multiple BITMAP indices?

    Given the table (simple, made-up example):
    CREATE TABLE applicant_diversity_info (
    applicant_diversity_id NUMBER(12), PRIMARY KEY(applicant_diversity_id),
    apply_date DATE,
    ssn_salted_md5 RAW(16),
    gender CHAR(1), CHECK ( (gender IS NULL OR gender IN ('M','F')) ),
    racial_continent VARCHAR2(30), CHECK ( (racial_continent IS NULL
    OR racial_continent IN ('Europe','Africa','America','Asia_Pacific')) ),
    ethnic_supergroup VARCHAR2(30), CHECK ( (ethnic_supergroup IS NULL OR ethnic_supergroup IN ('Latin American','Other')) ),
    hire_salary NUMBER(11,2),
    hire_month DATE,
    termination_salary NUMBER(11,2),
    termination_month DATE,
    termination_cause VARCHAR2(30), CHECK ( (termination_cause IS NULL
    OR termination_cause IN ('Resigned','Leave of Absence','Laid Off','Performance','Cause')) )
    Oracle (syntactically) allows me to create either one BITMAP index over all four small-cardinality columns
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX applicant_diversity_diversity_idx ON applicant_diversity_info (
    gender, racial_continent, ethnic_supergroup, termination_reason );
    or four independent indexes
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX applicant_diversity_gender_idx ON applicant_diversity_info ( gender );
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX applicant_diversity_race_idx ON applicant_diversity_info ( raceial_continent );
    etc.
    What is the difference between the two approaches; is there any meaningful difference in disk-space between the one multi-colum index and the four single-column indexes? Does it make a difference in what the query-planner will consider?
    And, if I define one multi-column BITMAP index, does the order of columns matter?

    >
    What is the difference between the two approaches; is there any meaningful difference in disk-space between the one multi-colum index and the four single-column indexes? Does it make a difference in what the query-planner will consider?
    And, if I define one multi-column BITMAP index, does the order of columns matter?
    >
    You may want to read this two-part blog, that answers that exact question, by recognized expert Richard Foote
    http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2010/05/06/concatenated-bitmap-indexes-part-i-two-of-us/
    http://richardfoote.wordpress.com/2010/05/12/concatenated-bitmap-indexes-part-ii-everybodys-got-to-learn-sometime/
    As with many things Oracle the answer is 'it depends'.
    In short the same considerations apply for a concatenated index whether it is bitmap or b-tree: 1) will the leading column usually be in the predicate and 2) will most or all of the index columns be specified in the queries.
    Here are some quotes from part 1
    >
    Many of the same issues and factors in deciding to create a single, multi-column index vs. several, single column indexes apply to Bitmap indexes as they do with B-Tree indexes, although there are a number of key differences to consider as well.
    Another thing to note regarding a concatenated Bitmap index is that the potential number of index entries is a product of distinct combinations of data of the indexed columns.
    A concatenated Bitmap index can potentially use less or more space than corresponding single column indexes, it depends on the number of index entries that are derived and the distribution of the data with the table.
    >
    Here is the lead quote from part 2
    >
    The issues regarding whether to go for single column indexes vs. concatenated indexes are similar for Bitmap indexes as they are for B-Tree indexes.
    It’s generally more efficient to access a concatenated index as it’s only the one index with less processing and less throwaway rowids/rows to contend with. However it’s more flexible to have single column indexes, especially for Bitmap indexes that are kinda designed to be used concurrently, as concatenated indexes are heavily dependant on the leading column being known in queries.

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is "Yiu" and how can I get rid of it?

    What the heck is "Yiu" (always pops up when I mistype "you") and is there any way to permanently remove it from the iPhone dictionary? It's really silly that it's there; I'd say 999,999 times out of 1,000,000 someone is trying to type "you". C'mon.

  • How to use HR application with Remote Database ?

    Hi, I tested the HR application but it working on local database. How can I create same application which will communicate with Remote Database. Any guideline ? Regards, Ajay Sharma

  • Customize menu

    Clicking on the elipses (...) on a document a menu pops up  View properties Edit properties Versions etc... I've been asked to remove "Publish a major version" from this list. Can I customize this in SP2013 designer and if so, how?   Thanks Tom

  • MouseListener not responding.

    I'm working on a school project to make a video player/image gallery/Paint rip-off. I'm having a problem with a MouseListener that's not responding and I don't know how to get around it. (Note: I know that combining Swing and JavaFX is error-prone an

  • Choice of editing software

    In iPhoto I could choose to have Photoshop Elements as my photo editor. There doesn't seem to be a choice with Photos.