R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled)

Hello
I have configured free goods as per the requirement of my client. But in the sales order Pricing Analysis R100 condition type is not triggering and getting the below error.
R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled)
The requirement 055 is assigned to this condition in the pricing procedure. This requirement was not met and so the condition was excluded from further processing.
Can you please advise.....

+In response to what _Sureshndk_ wrote:+
Hi friends
>
> I found the solution for my error posted above. There was no problem in any of the settings. Its just a confusion.
AMAZING! I was checking in the main item level Pricing analysis overview, thats why it was showing as R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled).
>
> But in the header lever and sub item (free good item) level R100 is triggering with out any error.
>
> Thank you guys....
> Suresh
Just request don't be in hurry to get you query solved quickly.
Do a proper investigation before posting your query on Forum.
As everyone will agree that, if the problem is not elaborate properly, we do make some assumption to provide solution.
Finally, i would request you, "Try to respect others Time & Effort."
Regards
JP

Similar Messages

K004 111 Condition ignored (requirement 002 not fulfilled)

Hello Gurus,
I have included K004 in v/06,v/08, and did all in ovkk and vk11, but still when created sales order I cant see K004. Upon analysis it says "K004 111 Condition ignored (requirement 002 not fulfilled)".
The strange thing is when I am manually doing K004 it picks the data of K004 . I checked if it is checked manual, but it is not.
Could you please tell, where I am going wrong.
Note: I have tried with K005 it is working , means it comes in sales order, but not k004.
Thanks,
Ven

hi,
please maintain 2 in requriment field against in K004 and proceed.
that means item with pricing.
if it is not working ask ABAPER to debugg it.
regarsd.
balajia
Edited by: balaji timmampalli achari on Nov 24, 2010 12:35 PM

Condition type EDI1 in PO: Condition ignored (requirement 053 not fulfilled)

Hi,
I am trying to change price in condition type EDI1 of a line item, but I am getting following error:
PO has AB confirmation and GR also has been done. Still getting this error. Please suggest how to rectify this.
Thanks and Regards,
D. Krishna Bharadwaj.

Hi,
The condition types EDI1 and EDI2 are used when the vendor send the price change and is accepted automatically. Refer the note: 456127 - FAQ: Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) in purchasing Question number 14.
Regards,
AKPT

Output ignored (requirement 107 not fulfilled)

Dear All,
We set up a new confirmation controll for purchase orders. In test (output of message AUFB) we receive the message is not processed and we have for this message type the following message (Analyse output):
AUFB 502 Output ignored (requirement 107 not fulfilled)
What is this routine 107 and what have we to do to resolve this problem?
Thank you for your help.
Best regards,
Thomas

Hi,
Goto SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Messages > Output Control > Message Determination Schemas > Define Message Schema for Purchase Order > Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order > Select Schema "RMBEF1" and double click on "Control data" in dialog structure, chcek for message tyep AUFB, requirement 107 i.e. Ord.Confirm.Dunning is assigned.

Requirements are not fulfilled for condition PI01

Dear SD guru,
        When i create sales order,it prompt that 'Requirements are not fulfilled for condition PI01'.
          For the specifical requirement,i use the intercompany processing.I want two invoices in this sale document,onr for customer,the other for internal processing.So i need two condition types for two price,i use the condition type ZABC&PI01(for internal) in the pricing procedure.But,when i create sales order under the configuration,it failed.
      How can i solve the problem?
TKS!
Edited by: stephen chow on Sep 8, 2008 9:35 AM

We need to change the condition class from prices to other like discount or surcharge in the condition type.
For ex: If it is shipment cost document got to goto T_06 select the required condition and change the condition class and do not select grouping conditions..
Thanks,
ratna
Edited by: ratna edpi on Oct 24, 2008 6:04 PM.
Edited by: ratna edpi on Oct 24, 2008 6:05 PM
Edited by: ratna edpi on Oct 24, 2008 6:07 PM

Rebate:condition requirement 24 not fulfilled

Dear Sirs
I am processing billing doc but rebate condition type is not activated at f2 billing type.
I have maintained rebate condition type in pricing procedure.
When i go through "Analysis" tab in sales order item condition level I found that there is message regarding rebate condition type was
"condition requirement 24 not fulfilled" . I have gone through thread dated 2 feb 2011 raised by sapuser. I refer the same but not very much clear regarding the solution.
solution suggested " when debuging it was found that pricing type changed from X to xx in copy control"
now my queries are :
1) In which screen pricing type has to changed for copy control
2) What could be possible errors might come in case condition requirement not fulfilled in pricing procedure with reference to rebates because there are about 5 types of rebates and all are having same requirement in pricing procedure
Kindly help
Regards
KAPIL MORE

Dear Ivano Sir
Firstly extremely sorry to close these query so late and also thanks for giving me yours valuable time but henceforth i will see that i should give response to your feedback .
Actually i have solve this query by debugging and understood.
Could u please if possible kindly give me some inputs regarding user-exits.
Regards
KAPIL MORE

Requirements are not fulfilled for condition EDI1

Hi Gurus,
We are trying to add (EDI1 confirmed qty) in the PO item conditions.
We are using the standard PO schema which has these condition type. It has no access sequence attached to it and hence it is a manual entry.
If we try to add that condition type in the PO it throws me the following error :
"Requirements are not fulfilled for condition EDI1
Message no. V1215"
Kindly let me know what I have to maintain at the earliest.
Best Regards,
Ravi.

You incorrectly filling item information with condition value. All quotation related pricing need to pass QUOTATION_CONDITIONS_IN table paramete of BAPI.
Try it and the problem get solved.
Cheers
Nilesh Shete

Output Requirement not Fulfilled (But output generated anyway?)

Hello Gurus,
I am facing a very strange situation.
I have added a custom field to the field catalog for output determination.
The setup looks all good, the communication structure is populating the field just fine and the output gets triggered as expected.
However, when I go to the determination analysis (VF02 > Header > Output > Goto > Det. Analysis), it shows the infamous message: Output ignored (requirement 901 not fulfilled). I know you will all say that the requirements in 901 are custom and I should check with my developer, but let's skip that part:
From VOFM, my requirement 901 is a 'copy' of 062 and is as simple as below. In debug I could confirm that all checks pass.
FORM KOBED_901.
   SY-SUBRC = 4.
                                     1
   check SY-TCODE = 'VF01'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'.
   SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDFORM.
FORM KOBEV_901.
   SY-SUBRC = 4.
                                 1
   check SY-TCODE = 'VF01'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE.
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'.
   SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDFORM.
So the issue is more around: Why is the determination analysis showing me that the output was ignored due to requirement not fulfilled if the actual output was successfully determined and processed in the document?

Hi Jelena,
Thank you for your reply.
Here you can see the details where the manual change flag can be seen (unticked).
Regarding the Requirement checks, when I say all checks passed, I mean that every single value in the code is equal to the value it is checking against, for example:
CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALL CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVPRS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-UVALS CA ' C'. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RELIK EQ SPACE. (value is initial = pass)
   CHECK : KOMKBV3-RFBSK EQ 'C'. (value is 'C' = pass)
Therefore, SY-SUBRC = 0 and the output is determined.
The outcome is exactly the expected, the output is determined.
The issue is in the analysis screen that shows the requirement as not fulfilled even though the output was successfully determined and I cannot see the access sequence used to determine the output.

Output type not appearing in interco. document - Req. 905 not fulfilled

Hi everyone. WHen i am creating my intercompany document, no output type is appearing. I have maintained VV31 condition records as well as WE20 settings. Also i have set output device to LOCL .When i click on Analysis output , it gives me
RD00 502 Output ignored (requirement 905 not fulfilled).
Any idea on this?

Is it a newly develop routine.
I'm not technical guy.
But, in my opinion, the code need further work-on.
There are
- no IF statement
- no READ statement
- no table-field refer
- logic for processing missing
FORM KOBED_905.
sy-subrc = 4.
check komkbv3-rfbsk = 'C'.
sy-subrc = 0.
ENDFORM.
FORM KOBEV_905.
ENDFORM.
For instance in this code, if there is no READ Statement, how
sy-subrc = 4
Then how system will judge 'READ' statement failed i.e., no record is found with key specified by you.
Check/discuss with ABABer teammate for this.
Further, try to manually put this output type in your desire billing type.
Regards
JP

Requirements not fulfilled for EK01

Hi
I'm trying to invoice some travel expenses (costs) in DP90 and i'm getting a message 'Requirements are not fulfilled for condition EK01' can anyone help.......
Thanks
Sara

Refer & Check SAP Note 30903 - V1215: Requirements not fulfilled
If a condition is entered manually and its requirement is not fulfilled, error message V1215 appears: Requirements are not fulfilled for condition Example: Inserting a condition type manually which is not used during automatic pricing due to the requirement not being fulfilled.
Cause and prerequisites
Change in function PRICING_CHECK (LV61AU08): * Bedingungen prüfen
IF KOMT1-KOBED NE 0 AND INCL_KONDITIONEN NE NO.
BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN-NR = KOMT1-KOBED.
PERFORM (BEDINGUNG_PRUEFEN) IN PROGRAM SAPLV61A.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
MESSAGE E215 WITH KOMT1-KSCHL RAISING CONDITION. "<-- Reason
ENDIF.
Solution
Workaround solution: Since it mostly concerns conditions to which an access sequence is assigned but which is still to be entered manually, you should create an identical condition (apart from the name) which is only to be maintained manually and does not have this requirement. The source code should not be modified for reasons of consistency.
OR
Refer & Check: SAP Note 102060 - Exclusion when changing conditions manually
Symptom
If an exclusion indicator is set for a condition with a condition record and this indicator is called in a requirement assigned to it, the following procedure can cause the condition to exclude itself so that as a result of the error message no further processing is possible: After you manually change the condition affected on the condition screen, you carry out a new pricing and afterwards you change the condition again manually.
Cause and prerequisites
Field KOMP-KZNEP is not initialized correctly in function module PRICING_CHECK.
Solution
The error is corrected in Release 4.5A, an advance correction is attached.
OR
Refer & Check: SAP Note 668362 - Expected customer price /value with IDoc
Symptom
When you create a sales order via IDoc, the expected customer price or customer value can be assigned in segment E1J3P01. For this, condition types JED1 or JED2 are used. These condition types are set as dimension-dependent conditions by default (T685A-J_3ASZCO) and are thus created on schedule line level.
If you change this setting in Customizing, these condition types are created on item level (see Note 191742). Now, if the price or the value have different values within one item in entry segment E1J3P01, it is not possible to create this condition on item level. The system generates error message V1215 'Requirements are not fulfilled for condition JED1/2'.
Reason and Prerequisites
The system behaves correctly. In this case, condition JED1 or JED2 would have to be created explicitly for the respective schedule lines because different values are assigned in entry segment E1J3P01. However, as Customizing was changed for these condition types, this cannot occur. Error message V1215 displayed in this case is, however, incorrect.
Solution
After the implementation of the advance correction, the system does not display error message /AFS/IDOC021 'Item condition JED1/2 for nnn is not identical in all schedule lines'.
Hope it will solve your requirement.
Thanks & Regards
JP
Edited by: J Prakash on May 20, 2010 9:23 AM

K007, Export Sales, Requirement not fulfilled

Dear All,
I have created one export order. In the pricing procedure, K007 condition type is present. Normally, as a rare case we do give discount to the customers on export sales.
When I am entering the K007 condition manually, it is not allowing me to proceed further.
The error message is as follows:
Requirements are not fulfilled for condition K007
Message no. V1215
Diagnosis
The requirements have not been fulfilled for <GL:condition type>condition K007.
System Response
The system does not allow further processing of the document.
Procedure
Delete the condition from the document.
You can display the requirements allocated to the condition in Customizing for the relevant pricing procedure.
Can I know any specific reason for this?
Thanks and Regards
Adithya

This due to routine 2 assigned to cond type requirement in pricing procedure.
See, as per F1 help for pricing routine 2, refer following example
Some of the items in the order will be free to the customer and the customer service representative indicates this with the item category TANN. In the IMG, item category TANN has been configured as not relevant for pricing. Within the pricing procedure, the user assigns requirement '2' to all condition types. Using this requirement, the system does not access any pricing condition records for the free line item. In addition to offering free items, some of the prices for products in the sales order are defined as net prices. When a net price is found, no subsequent discounts or surcharges should be assigned to the item.
So, its system satandard behaviour & you can maintain value for K007 in the free item or item not relevant for pricing.
Regards
JP

Requirements not fulfilled for EK01 while running DP91

Hi
Time entry is done against the network ,cost is flown to the Project.When i run DP91 to create the debit memo for the project order it throws the error that "Requirement not fulfilled for EK01",
Am i missing something... somebody can help.
Thanks
Alags

Hi,
Check settings in OPD4
Here you have to assign EK01 condition to sales document.
Kapil

Audit not fulfilled :sub-requirement:

Hi,
I'm trying to create a sub-requirement to check that a student has passed 2 modules out of 10 modules in the same module group. I tried to used an Index- Dependent Requirement which has parameters as follows:
Tab Performance Indices
Perform Index--> No of booked Sm
Operand -->Greater than
Value -->2
Unit--> ST
Tab Academic Work Selection
Filter --> SAP5: Modules from Module Group
However, I got the result of "NOt fulfilled" when I ran the audit via Web. Anyone has answer how to do it?
Thanks a bunch!

It sounds like you set everything up correctly. Try the following to debug:
- Use the same subrequirement and change the index to Credits (Audits). You say that works already for you. Make sure it works for the same Module Group.
- Check that you have the right Object ID entered for the Module Group.
- Check that your relationships from Module Group to Module are correct and valid for the key date.
Also, what is the BSP telling you about the calculated value? Is it showing correctly, and the result is just not correct, or is the calculated value also wrong?
Maybe one of these things will give you enough clues to figure out why it is not working in your case.
Good luck!
Michael

Moved Music to New Hard Drive - Required folder not found??? pls help

Hello
I have recently purchased a new external hard drive as my crappy Dell was full to the brim with music.
I have moved all my music files over to the hard drive and re installed itunes.
Now when i drag my music folder into the itunes library it updates but the shortly after an error message occurs that says:-
'Itunes Libray music file cannot be saved. Required folder not found'
Previously i have saved my itunes folder within my music folder?.
Now everytime i close down itunes all my music has gone from it!??
Any suggestions....sorry if being really ignorant..not too profficient on computers..
Thanks in advance.
Sam
Dell PC Windows XP
Dell PC Windows XP

I think itunes by default looks inside you my music folder. In the itunes preferences screen there is an option to select a new folder to your library. Change the path to the music folder on your external drive. Make sure to always have the drive turned on before launching itunes though.
You may also be able to replace the my music folder with a shortcut to the music folder on the external drive. This behavior may not work in windows though so I'm not sure.

Scheduling agreement qty requirement is not considered in V_V2

Hi Friends,
We are facing a problem in rescheduling transaction V_V2. System is not considering the requirement of the confirmed schedule lines of the scheduling agreement while carrying out the ATP in V_V2 and the available qty is allocated to the sales orders.
Ex: Available Stock : 1000 EA
1. SA confirmed Qty: 1000
2. Sales order created for the qty of 1000, system is considering the SA requirement and confirming the SO based on RLT.
3. When we run ATP in sales order change, system is still considering the SA requirement and not changing the confirmed date.
4. But when we run the V_V2, system is ignoring the SA and confirming the SO line item with PULL-IN.
Because of this SO is stealing the stock reserved for the SA. Is there a way to change the behavior of V_V2 similar to VA02, which considers the SA requirement / confirmed qty while rescheduling.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Ram,
Rescheduling of sales documents is item specific. It is not possible to reschedule individual schedule lines of scheduling
agreements. Each schedule line is displayed but only the open quantity can be rescheduled.
You can find further information in SDV03V02 documentation.
The open qty on item level will be checked becasue rescheduling of sales documents (scheduling agreements) is item specific.
Availability Check in Rescheduling is always on item-level.
Thanks and best regards,
Smile

R100 - Condition ignored (requirement 055 not fulfilled)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for