RE: Forte/SNMP?

There was a session given at the 1996 Forum about setting up an SNMP
server. The FShare CD includes instructions and an example .pex file.
I believe you should be able to get the same examples from the Shareware
section of the Forte web site.
Kal Inman
Andersen Windows
From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 1997 9:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Forte/SNMP?
Has anyone built agents that post Forte system events to external
monitoring systems such as HP OpenView?
I could have sworn there was some built-in support for this but cannot find
it in the docs for R2.x or R30b0.
Any help would be appreciated,
--Paul

We have built an interface for Tivoli's TEC Server that forwards Forte
Partition Events (partition up, down, degraded, going down etc) as well as
application exceptions. This does not use SNMP, it follows Tivoli's Event
Adapter specification and uses an API provided by Tivoli.
We also built some companion components that read the Forte Environment and
populate an external DB modeled after Tivoli's Application Management
Specification and the DMTF. Once this DB has been populated Tivoli rules
invoke applets that perform root cause analysis of an event storm to
determine probable cause and then open a trouble ticket with the probable
cause identified plus a list of applications that are likely to be affected
by the offending event generator.
This approach can be tailored to fit other Event Monitoring Tools such as
HP OpenView assuming that:
1) an API exists to wrapper to forward the events or possible a socket
connection to the event server
2) the event console has the ability to act on event types
3) the event console can spawn an external executable
I will be giving a presentation about our approach as well as a
demonstration at Forte Forum.
Chris Capadouca
Senior Technical Architect
Forte First Strike Team, DelTA Group
SHL Systemhouse, an MCI Company
[email protected]
( 604)583-3495
From: [email protected][SMTP:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 1997 7:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Forte/SNMP?
Has anyone built agents that post Forte system events to external
monitoring systems such as HP OpenView?
I could have sworn there was some built-in support for this but cannot
find
it in the docs for R2.x or R30b0.
Any help would be appreciated,
--Paul                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           

Similar Messages

  • Forte-SNMP

    There is some Forte shareware on the Forte home page -- look under
    Support, then CyberSupport, then Shareware. This shareware needs
    some other software from a company called SNMP Research. To the
    best of my knowledge, it works (I wrote it).
    All my best,
    Geoff of Georgia
    flying to Atlanta tomorrow!
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    There is some Forte shareware on the Forte home page -- look under
    Support, then CyberSupport, then Shareware. This shareware needs
    some other software from a company called SNMP Research. To the
    best of my knowledge, it works (I wrote it).
    All my best,
    Geoff of Georgia
    flying to Atlanta tomorrow!
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • Performance analysis and monitoring of a Forteapplication

    Hello,
    It would be good if one could do some performance analysis and monitoring of
    a Forte application at production time.
    By performance analysis I mean measure the time some selected methods take
    to return. In a CS application such a method would be some selected method
    of a key remote service representative of the application's activity.
    One would like to mesure the min, max, average time, and also give a
    threshhold which when reached will automatically generate an alarm or some
    pre-defined processing.
    The most powerful way would be to use a SNMP application through a Forte -
    SNMP gateway. (see the G. Puterbaugh paper "Building a Forte-SNMP gateway"
    in the 96' Forte Forum proceedings).
    But before going that far some simple means accessible through EConsole
    would already be great.
    A collegue of mine when to that Forum and reported that Puterbaugh said that
    such an agent is currently missing, but that its implementation is not
    difficult.
    I looked at all the agents and their instruments. I came to the following
    conclusions :
    1) instrumented data are available at the granularity level of a partition,
    not at a smaller granularity. For example, the DistObjectMgr agent gives you
    very useful information : the number of events (sent/received) and the
    number of (remote) methods (called/invoked), but this for the entire
    partition. Thus it prevents making tuned observations (unless you partition
    in a special way your application to put in a dedicated partition the thing
    you want to observe and only this thing).
    2) there is no instrumented data related to processing time.
    This leads me to the point that no information observed by the standard
    agents help me figuring out my performances. Thus I have to add at
    development time some lines of code to the methods I potentially want to
    observe later at production time to generate the appropriate information a
    custom agent will then display (process) with the appropriate instruments.
    Does someone share this position ?
    Has someone implemented such an agent and assotiated means ?
    PS: I will probably implement my own one if no other way around.
    best regards,
    Pierre Gelli
    ADP GSI
    Payroll and Human Resources Management
    72-78, Grande Rue, F-92310 SEVRES
    phone : +33 1 41 14 86 42 (direct) +33 1 41 14 85 00 (reception desk)
    fax : +33 1 41 14 85 99

    Hello,
    It would be good if one could do some performance analysis and monitoring of
    a Forte application at production time.
    By performance analysis I mean measure the time some selected methods take
    to return. In a CS application such a method would be some selected method
    of a key remote service representative of the application's activity.
    One would like to mesure the min, max, average time, and also give a
    threshhold which when reached will automatically generate an alarm or some
    pre-defined processing.
    The most powerful way would be to use a SNMP application through a Forte -
    SNMP gateway. (see the G. Puterbaugh paper "Building a Forte-SNMP gateway"
    in the 96' Forte Forum proceedings).
    But before going that far some simple means accessible through EConsole
    would already be great.
    A collegue of mine when to that Forum and reported that Puterbaugh said that
    such an agent is currently missing, but that its implementation is not
    difficult.
    I looked at all the agents and their instruments. I came to the following
    conclusions :
    1) instrumented data are available at the granularity level of a partition,
    not at a smaller granularity. For example, the DistObjectMgr agent gives you
    very useful information : the number of events (sent/received) and the
    number of (remote) methods (called/invoked), but this for the entire
    partition. Thus it prevents making tuned observations (unless you partition
    in a special way your application to put in a dedicated partition the thing
    you want to observe and only this thing).
    2) there is no instrumented data related to processing time.
    This leads me to the point that no information observed by the standard
    agents help me figuring out my performances. Thus I have to add at
    development time some lines of code to the methods I potentially want to
    observe later at production time to generate the appropriate information a
    custom agent will then display (process) with the appropriate instruments.
    Does someone share this position ?
    Has someone implemented such an agent and assotiated means ?
    PS: I will probably implement my own one if no other way around.
    best regards,
    Pierre Gelli
    ADP GSI
    Payroll and Human Resources Management
    72-78, Grande Rue, F-92310 SEVRES
    phone : +33 1 41 14 86 42 (direct) +33 1 41 14 85 00 (reception desk)
    fax : +33 1 41 14 85 99

  • SNMP and Forte

    I tried to post an answer earlier, but it seems to have
    gone astray.
    There is shareware information and source code for
    an SNMP interface on the Forte home page. Look
    under "Technical Info" and then under "Shareware."
    This will show you how to build an SNMP sub-agent
    using tools from SNMP Research, and establish
    a gateway between Forte and SNMP. The same
    assembly of tools should enable you to generate
    SNMP trap instructions from events generated by
    your Forte programs.
    Hope this helps!
    All my best,
    Geoff

    configure: error: This build is using a GNU C compiler (gcc) while Perl has been compiled with a non-GNU (or non-working) compiler (cc). This likely won't work for building with Perl support. Either specify a different compiler (--with-cc=PATH), disable this check (--disable-perl-cc-checks) or build without Perl (--without-perl-modules).The perl supplied by Sun should be compiled with Sun Studio and the error mentioned above seems to reflect this.
    So, either build perl first with sunfreeware's gcc and then move on to net-snmp or install and use Sun Studio instead of gcc so perl is happy.
    alan

  • Building Net-SNMP with gcc and Solaris 10's Forte-built Perl

    The 5.0.9 Net-SNMP that come with Solaris SPARC is too old for our users. Building the latest version appears to be basically impossible and I'm just about to bail and just build yet another version of Perl for Solaris 10 so it will work. But on the chance that someone has done this:
    I am trying to build Net-SNMP 5.4.1.2 with the Sunfreeware gcc. The configure script seems to ignore the --disable-perl-cc-checks flag:
    ./configure with-perl-modules disable-perl-cc-checks
    configure: error: This build is using a GNU C compiler (gcc) while Perl has been compiled with a non-GNU (or non-working) compiler (cc). This likely won't work for building with Perl support. Either specify a different compiler (--with-cc=PATH), disable this check (--disable-perl-cc-checks) or build without Perl (--without-perl-modules).
    Has anyone successfully done this? I was hoping to get a successful configure run, then build the binaries, and then further tweak the perl makefiles with "GCC=/usr/perl5/5.8.4/bin/perlgcc" or something.

    configure: error: This build is using a GNU C compiler (gcc) while Perl has been compiled with a non-GNU (or non-working) compiler (cc). This likely won't work for building with Perl support. Either specify a different compiler (--with-cc=PATH), disable this check (--disable-perl-cc-checks) or build without Perl (--without-perl-modules).The perl supplied by Sun should be compiled with Sun Studio and the error mentioned above seems to reflect this.
    So, either build perl first with sunfreeware's gcc and then move on to net-snmp or install and use Sun Studio instead of gcc so perl is happy.
    alan

  • SNMP management client

    We are looking for information on SNMP management client that integrates
    well with Forte. If anybody has done something with SNMP, I would like to
    find out what you are using and how difficult was the process.
    thanks in advance.
    ka
    Kamran Amin
    Framework, Inc.
    303 South Broadway
    Tarrytown, NY 10591
    (914) 631-8953x121
    kamran.aminlendware.com
    http://www.lendware.com/

    Issue resolved.
    If anyone has this problem again, the solution is in two parts:
    (1) SNMPAgents do not respond to incorrectly configured requests so disable the security to permit testing. For the SNMPAgent all useful setting seem to reside in the SimpleAgent.xml file, so find the SNMP "version" and set it to "1". So far I haven't been able to find any documentation for this component.
    File: C:\JavaCAPS51\emanager\server\monitor\snmpagent\config\SnmpAgent.xml
    <properties
    version="3" -- Change to 1, available options (1|2|3)
    />
    All polling requests should work now.
    (2) The "AdventNet SNMP Adaptor 5 MibBrowser" doesn&#8217;t appear to support SNMP v3 security fully, or in a way compatible with the SNMPAgent implementation. The "iReasoning MIB Browser" (Professional Edition only with v3 support) works fine. Judging by the log files the CAPS SNMPAgent uses the iReasoning SNMP API.

  • ASN.1 to Forte compiler

    Hello,
    Has anyone created an ASN.1 to Forte compiler? We wish to use some
    protocols that are specified with ASN.1 from within Forte and this would be
    an easy way of accomplishing it. Or, if anyone has other ideas on how we
    could easily code in Forte for ASN.1, it would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    - David Paxson
    [email protected]
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Yes i am talking about the SNMP MIBS. I have to pull some data from the database table BLOB Column which is ASN format data.. i would have to extract the data do certain processing based on it and create another data packet in ASN format and update teh tavle.. I have the MIB structure and i am in the process of creating the XSD out of it... could you please suggest the best way to do it or a example would be a great help...
    Thanks
    Sravanti

  • SNMP ifindex in Solaris 10

    Can anyone tell me how I can nail down the SNMP ifmib ifindex table on a Solaris 10 server? Every time the server guys add a subintderface, I have to reconfigure my PRTG and Spectrum models, and it's getting tedious. I cannot believe there is no way to nail down e1000g0=#2, e1000g1=#3, etc.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kevin Dorrell
    Luxembourg

    it should be possible to define the "index" in each /etc/hostname. file
    I have never done this, but when the system boots it reads the content of these files and passes them to "ifconfig" to configure the NICs
    search this page for "index":
    http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/816-5166/ifconfig-1m/index.html

  • RE: (forte-users) 3J= 3M new to me error

    Hi Thomas,
    Thanks for your email but I think it will be interesting for Brenda not me.
    It is exactly what I have expected from Forte Support: detailed information
    about bugs and workarounds. But what I cannot understand is that #53398 was
    released without any information about possible reasons for this problem or
    suggested workarounds. My first reaction after reading this bugreport was to
    open a new case at CallCenter to get more information about it. Please
    release more information with your bug reports !
    Regards
    Zenon Adamek
    Information Services
    Senior Programmer Analyst
    Tel: 905 712-1084 ext. 3628
    Fax: 905 712-6709
    E-mail: zadamekpurolator.com
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Thomas Degen - Sun Germany Forte Tools - Bonn
    [SMTP:thomas.degensun.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:49 AM
    To: Adamek, Zenon
    Cc: 'Brenda Cumming'; Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
    Hi Zenon,
    bug #53398 is not a bug which will likely get fixed, it's an informational
    bugreport.
    You might see an errorstack like Brenda has reported (and described in
    informational
    bugreport #53398) probably when you are doing something illegal that is
    possible
    via Forte Tool but Forte is not trapping it for performance reasons. Hence
    you will see
    the error coming from your illegal operation only at runtime, probably
    only
    while
    running interpreted in the Forte IDE, but in worst case it might be even a
    segmentation
    violation.
    Technotes 12448 'Sudden client partition crashes at runtime' and 11225
    'Don't reparent
    mapped Widgets between UserWindows at runtime' explain this matter . See
    attached.
    But maybe Brenda is much more experiencing a problem as described by Forte
    Technote 11398 'Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
    control'
    that might get easily resolved via setting of FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE=0.
    Good Luck and Best Regards !
    BTW: I've logged bug #53398, so I've felt responsible to explain its real
    background.
    Thomas
    Thomas Degen
    Sun Microsystems - Forte Tools
    Forte CTE & Sustaining Group
    Technical Support Germany
    tel.:+49.228/91499-50
    MailTo:thomas.degensun.com
    Technote 11398 Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
    control
    SCENARIO:
    Getting some unusual interpreter errors that result in an error stating
    that
    the workspace has been set to read only. Please see Enclosures for the
    two
    most common error stacks that have been encountered. The abbreviated
    versions of the errors are:
    - Can't read record (record size = -1)
    - Id in index does not match id in record header in data file
    - Recursive deserialization attempted.
    - Unknown Mark type in deserialization
    - Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
    Header
    is corrupt.
    These errors can be happening in either the development environment when
    running from one of the development workshops, or with the deployed
    application.
    The bug outlined in this Technote may be the culprit if the errors above
    are
    seen when running a client on Windows NT or Motif and the user interface
    incorporates ActiveX controls or ListView/TreeView widgets.
    CAUSE:
    Basically what is happening is that in rare circumstances Forte may invoke
    a
    nested copy of the interpreter while the first interpreter has yielded.
    This
    is not a problem in and of itself, but in the case where the original
    interpreter was in the middle of a repository fetch when it yielded, and
    the second interpreter needs to fetch code as well, we will get one of the
    errors listed above, depending on the exact timing. The reason for the
    errors is that the repository code at this level is thread-safe but not
    re-entrant. It is protected by a mutex that is already owned by the
    current task. Which, given the scenario outlined here, where the two
    interpreters are running inside of the same task, results in the nested
    interpreter being allowed to change data out from under the first.
    While for every fetch one or more calls to WindowSystem.Yield will be made
    (this is there to prevent the semblance of system lock-up on Win 3.1,
    where
    Yield is the only way other applications can be allowed to run), there is
    a parameter which controls how often to actually yield, which by default
    is
    set to one out of every 100 calls. This is the reason the problem is
    intermittent--you need a yield to occur during a repository fetch
    which starts another interpreter which also needs to fetch code from
    disk.
    The reason this has only surfaced recently is that the nested interpreter
    scenario can only happen in 2 cases that we know of:
    - ActiveX controls which respond to events/Windows messages
    - Outline fields/ListViews with column(s) mapped to virtual
    attributes
    In all other normal cases, the yield can process the message (typically a
    paint message) without starting another interpreter, so regardless of
    whether
    the first interpreter yielded during a repository operation or not, there
    is
    no conflict.
    SOLUTION:
    The workaround is to prevent yields altogether by setting the
    FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE environment variable equal to 0 in the client's
    environment. This should have no detrimental effects since the yield code
    is in place solely for Windows 3.1x clients.
    ERROR STACK 1
    SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
    read-only to
    prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
    repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your
    workspace
    contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to save this
    work.
    First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
    application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import
    the
    changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 695]
    Detected at: qqrp_Session::GetObjectById
    Last TOOL statement: method EFWindowController.EFEventLoop
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    The remainder of the Error Manager stack is:
    SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element (64,67470)
    (fetch
    bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-only to prevent the
    application
    from attempting to write to the repository. The repository and work you
    have
    saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace contains unsaved work,
    you
    may use the following procedure to save this work. First, export the
    changed
    components. Then, shut down and restart this application and reopen this
    workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the changed components and
    save
    your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 61]
    Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
    Last TOOL statement: method EFTabManagerNew.EFNoteBookHandler
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Unknown Mark type in deserialization.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1101, 34]
    Detected at: qqrp_DeSerializeObject::ProcessHdr
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    ERROR STACK 2
    SYSTEM ERROR: A serious error has occurred in Repository
    (c:\PROGRA~1\CSSPTEST\conplu0). Corrective action may be necessary.
    Notify
    your repository administrator.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1101, 198]
    Detected at: qqrp_Repository::Fetch
    Last TOOL statement: method
    SalesDevelopment_NWC.DEVNotifyofTabSetCurrent
    Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
    taskId =
    [769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
    Header is corrupt.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1106, 612]
    Detected at: qqbt_BtreeAccess::FetchDataFileRecord
    Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
    taskId =
    [769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
    Technote 11225 Don't reparent mapped Widgets between UserWindows at
    runtime
    It is sometimes tempting to unparent a widget from one UserWindow and
    reparent
    it into another at runtime. However, this can cause crashes if the widget
    (or
    its decendants) are "mapped" to data. Here's why...
    Suppose you have two UserWindows, UW1 and UW2. UW1 contains a DataField
    (DF1)
    which is mapped to a TextData. UW2 contains a RadioList (RL2) which is
    mapped to
    a scalar Integer. At compile time, every mapped attribute is internally
    assigned
    a "Map ID" (a small integer) which is used to tie the Widget to its
    corresponding attribute. These Map IDs are used by the Widget to look up a
    pointer to their data in a "Map" which is maintained by the UserWindow.
    Each
    UserWindow is assumed be to independent of the others, so there is nothing
    wrong
    with Widgets in different UserWindows being assigned the same Map IDs.
    In
    this
    case, let's assume that DF1 and RL2 both got assigned the same Map ID of
    3. No
    problem so far, since each lives in a separate UserWindow with a separate
    map.
    Now suppose at runtime the application "detaches" or unparents DF1 from
    its
    UserWindow and reparents it somewhere into UW2. When it comes time for DF1
    to
    paint itself the Display System it must ask the Runtime System for the
    value of
    DF1's mapped attribute. To do that it says "give me the value of the
    TextData
    for DF1. You'll find it in the Map for this UserWindow (UW1), and its Map
    ID is
    3". When the runtime system goes to do this it expects to find a TextData
    in
    this "slot" of the map, but instead it picks up the integer which is
    mapped to
    RL2. At best this leads to bad data being returned; more likely you get a
    segfault and a crash.
    If DF1 was not a mapped attribute (say, a Rectangle) there would be no
    problem
    because there is no data mapped to a Rectangle. If instead of moving DF1
    you
    created a brand new DataField on the fly there would be no problem,
    because the
    dynamic DataField would not have any Map ID and so couldn't conflict with
    any
    IDs in UW2.
    So how do you solve this problem? This is exactly what Nested Windows are
    all
    about. While you can't move DF1 into the middle of UW2, you can nest
    UW1.
    This
    works because UW1 brings its map with it, and when you access DF1 it knows
    to
    look up its value in UW1's map.
    UserWindows are intended to be the "unit of compilabilty" that can be
    nested
    inside other UserWindows. It is dangerous to "transplant" anything from
    inside
    one UserWindow into another at runtime.
    (Note that you can't avoid this problem by cloning DF1 because the MapID
    gets
    copied along with it, and the clone will fail in the same way.)
    Further details explained in related technote 12448 'Sudden client
    partition
    crashes at runtime.'
    Technote 12448 Sudden client partition crashes at runtime
    Scenario : You have two UserWindows, A and B. When Window A starts up, it
    instantiates an instance of B and reparents some component of B into A's
    window
    hierarchy.
    This is not allowed and almost always leads to an error at best or at
    worse a
    segmentation fault.
    Here's why :
    When you compile a UserWindow in Forte, each "mapped attribute" (whether a
    form
    element or menu element) is assigned an internal ID which represents an
    offset into
    that UserWindow's table of mapped attributes. This offset is only valid
    in the
    context of the UserWindow in which it was compiled. If you detach a
    FieldWidget or
    MenuWidget from one compiled Window ("tmpMenu" for example) and then
    parent
    into another compiled window ("tmpWindow") the internal ID comes with it.
    When Forte tries to make use of that copied widget it uses the ID as an
    offset
    into tmpWindow's table of mapped attributes. But that copied offset is
    meaningless in the context of tmpWindow's table, so you get some kind off
    error.
    In this case it found that the data type of the variable in the slot
    wasn't
    what
    was expected. But you might even index off the end of the table and get a
    segmentation fault.
    There is nothing to prevent you from dynamically creating menu items and
    adding
    them to a window at runtime; that will work fine. Although of course you
    can't
    access them via mapped attributes, since those can only be created at
    compile time.
    But you are not allowed to reparent a widget from one compiled UserWindow
    into
    the hierarchy of another.
    More information may be found in technote 11225 'Don't reparent mapped
    Widgets
    between UserWindows at runtime'.
    Possible errorstacks seen at runtime instead of a complete crash or
    segmentation
    violation while you are illegally reparenting a widget or menuitem between
    windows
    at runtime:
    Map::SetSubjectData: Invalid conversion from map type 0 to subject type 22
    SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 3 in method
    qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [1001, 381]
    Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 3
    Error Time: Wed Aug 09 13:03:57
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "testproject_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd,
    taskId =
    [D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd.68]) in application
    "FTLaunch_cl0", pid 672 on node ONEWAY in environment Audi3M2Env.
    At 13:14 26.09.00 -0400, Adamek, Zenon wrote:
    Hi,
    It is the unfixed defect 53398. Please contact Forte support.
    Zenon
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Brenda Cumming [SMTP:brenda_cummingtranscanada.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:15 PM
    To: Forte User group
    Subject: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
    Hi,
    We are in the process of going from 3J1 to 3.0.M.2, and I am getting
    this error that I am unfamiliar with on a GUI that works fine in 3J.
    It
    does not happen all the time, and I have been unable to establish the
    pattern that kicks it off. Has anyone seen this before?
    PS- this error is not occurring in the deployed (non-compiled) app,but
    when I am running locally from my workspace.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 6 in method
    qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [1001, 381]
    Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 6
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2,
    taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Can't find scope 20070 for a class.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [201, 11]
    Detected at: qqlo_ClassTableLoadScope at 1
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
    read-only to prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository.
    The repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If
    your
    workspace contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure
    to save this work. First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and
    restart this application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode.
    Finally, import the changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 695]
    Detected at: qqrp_Session::IsDistributed
    Last TOOL statement: method PPMeasWin.
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element
    (64,120684) (fetch bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-onlyto
    prevent
    the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
    repository
    and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace
    contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to savethis
    work.
    First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
    application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the
    changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 61]
    Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Recursive Deserialization attempted, Internal Error!
    Class: qqsp_UsageException with ReasonCode: SP_ER_INVALIDSTATE
    Error #: [301, 231]
    Detected at: qqsp_DeSerializeDriver::Run at 1
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in anew
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

    Hi Thomas,
    Thanks for your email but I think it will be interesting for Brenda not me.
    It is exactly what I have expected from Forte Support: detailed information
    about bugs and workarounds. But what I cannot understand is that #53398 was
    released without any information about possible reasons for this problem or
    suggested workarounds. My first reaction after reading this bugreport was to
    open a new case at CallCenter to get more information about it. Please
    release more information with your bug reports !
    Regards
    Zenon Adamek
    Information Services
    Senior Programmer Analyst
    Tel: 905 712-1084 ext. 3628
    Fax: 905 712-6709
    E-mail: zadamekpurolator.com
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Thomas Degen - Sun Germany Forte Tools - Bonn
    [SMTP:thomas.degensun.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:49 AM
    To: Adamek, Zenon
    Cc: 'Brenda Cumming'; Forte-userslists.xpedior.com
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
    Hi Zenon,
    bug #53398 is not a bug which will likely get fixed, it's an informational
    bugreport.
    You might see an errorstack like Brenda has reported (and described in
    informational
    bugreport #53398) probably when you are doing something illegal that is
    possible
    via Forte Tool but Forte is not trapping it for performance reasons. Hence
    you will see
    the error coming from your illegal operation only at runtime, probably
    only
    while
    running interpreted in the Forte IDE, but in worst case it might be even a
    segmentation
    violation.
    Technotes 12448 'Sudden client partition crashes at runtime' and 11225
    'Don't reparent
    mapped Widgets between UserWindows at runtime' explain this matter . See
    attached.
    But maybe Brenda is much more experiencing a problem as described by Forte
    Technote 11398 'Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
    control'
    that might get easily resolved via setting of FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE=0.
    Good Luck and Best Regards !
    BTW: I've logged bug #53398, so I've felt responsible to explain its real
    background.
    Thomas
    Thomas Degen
    Sun Microsystems - Forte Tools
    Forte CTE & Sustaining Group
    Technical Support Germany
    tel.:+49.228/91499-50
    MailTo:thomas.degensun.com
    Technote 11398 Read Only Workspace Errors using ListViews or ActiveX
    control
    SCENARIO:
    Getting some unusual interpreter errors that result in an error stating
    that
    the workspace has been set to read only. Please see Enclosures for the
    two
    most common error stacks that have been encountered. The abbreviated
    versions of the errors are:
    - Can't read record (record size = -1)
    - Id in index does not match id in record header in data file
    - Recursive deserialization attempted.
    - Unknown Mark type in deserialization
    - Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
    Header
    is corrupt.
    These errors can be happening in either the development environment when
    running from one of the development workshops, or with the deployed
    application.
    The bug outlined in this Technote may be the culprit if the errors above
    are
    seen when running a client on Windows NT or Motif and the user interface
    incorporates ActiveX controls or ListView/TreeView widgets.
    CAUSE:
    Basically what is happening is that in rare circumstances Forte may invoke
    a
    nested copy of the interpreter while the first interpreter has yielded.
    This
    is not a problem in and of itself, but in the case where the original
    interpreter was in the middle of a repository fetch when it yielded, and
    the second interpreter needs to fetch code as well, we will get one of the
    errors listed above, depending on the exact timing. The reason for the
    errors is that the repository code at this level is thread-safe but not
    re-entrant. It is protected by a mutex that is already owned by the
    current task. Which, given the scenario outlined here, where the two
    interpreters are running inside of the same task, results in the nested
    interpreter being allowed to change data out from under the first.
    While for every fetch one or more calls to WindowSystem.Yield will be made
    (this is there to prevent the semblance of system lock-up on Win 3.1,
    where
    Yield is the only way other applications can be allowed to run), there is
    a parameter which controls how often to actually yield, which by default
    is
    set to one out of every 100 calls. This is the reason the problem is
    intermittent--you need a yield to occur during a repository fetch
    which starts another interpreter which also needs to fetch code from
    disk.
    The reason this has only surfaced recently is that the nested interpreter
    scenario can only happen in 2 cases that we know of:
    - ActiveX controls which respond to events/Windows messages
    - Outline fields/ListViews with column(s) mapped to virtual
    attributes
    In all other normal cases, the yield can process the message (typically a
    paint message) without starting another interpreter, so regardless of
    whether
    the first interpreter yielded during a repository operation or not, there
    is
    no conflict.
    SOLUTION:
    The workaround is to prevent yields altogether by setting the
    FORTE_YIELD_THROTTLE environment variable equal to 0 in the client's
    environment. This should have no detrimental effects since the yield code
    is in place solely for Windows 3.1x clients.
    ERROR STACK 1
    SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
    read-only to
    prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
    repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your
    workspace
    contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to save this
    work.
    First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
    application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import
    the
    changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 695]
    Detected at: qqrp_Session::GetObjectById
    Last TOOL statement: method EFWindowController.EFEventLoop
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    The remainder of the Error Manager stack is:
    SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element (64,67470)
    (fetch
    bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-only to prevent the
    application
    from attempting to write to the repository. The repository and work you
    have
    saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace contains unsaved work,
    you
    may use the following procedure to save this work. First, export the
    changed
    components. Then, shut down and restart this application and reopen this
    workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the changed components and
    save
    your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 61]
    Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
    Last TOOL statement: method EFTabManagerNew.EFNoteBookHandler
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Unknown Mark type in deserialization.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1101, 34]
    Detected at: qqrp_DeSerializeObject::ProcessHdr
    Error Time: Tue Nov 18 15:58:47
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1,
    taskId =
    [7EFAE060-4AFA-11D1-A1C1-1FDC8A99AA77:0x446:0x1.23]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 147 on node ISD060 in environment EdgeTest.
    ERROR STACK 2
    SYSTEM ERROR: A serious error has occurred in Repository
    (c:\PROGRA~1\CSSPTEST\conplu0). Corrective action may be necessary.
    Notify
    your repository administrator.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1101, 198]
    Detected at: qqrp_Repository::Fetch
    Last TOOL statement: method
    SalesDevelopment_NWC.DEVNotifyofTabSetCurrent
    Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
    taskId =
    [769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Could not read record (64,74615) from repository data file.
    Header is corrupt.
    Class: qqsp_ImplementationException
    Error #: [1106, 612]
    Detected at: qqbt_BtreeAccess::FetchDataFileRecord
    Error Time: Wed Dec 03 10:27:22
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "ConPlus_GUI_cl0_Client",
    (partitionId = 769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1,
    taskId =
    [769D4310-6B88-11D1-84FD-65BF87C8AA77:0x121:0x1.22]) in application
    "ConPlus_GUI_cl0", pid 172 on node ISD42 in environment Edge.
    Technote 11225 Don't reparent mapped Widgets between UserWindows at
    runtime
    It is sometimes tempting to unparent a widget from one UserWindow and
    reparent
    it into another at runtime. However, this can cause crashes if the widget
    (or
    its decendants) are "mapped" to data. Here's why...
    Suppose you have two UserWindows, UW1 and UW2. UW1 contains a DataField
    (DF1)
    which is mapped to a TextData. UW2 contains a RadioList (RL2) which is
    mapped to
    a scalar Integer. At compile time, every mapped attribute is internally
    assigned
    a "Map ID" (a small integer) which is used to tie the Widget to its
    corresponding attribute. These Map IDs are used by the Widget to look up a
    pointer to their data in a "Map" which is maintained by the UserWindow.
    Each
    UserWindow is assumed be to independent of the others, so there is nothing
    wrong
    with Widgets in different UserWindows being assigned the same Map IDs.
    In
    this
    case, let's assume that DF1 and RL2 both got assigned the same Map ID of
    3. No
    problem so far, since each lives in a separate UserWindow with a separate
    map.
    Now suppose at runtime the application "detaches" or unparents DF1 from
    its
    UserWindow and reparents it somewhere into UW2. When it comes time for DF1
    to
    paint itself the Display System it must ask the Runtime System for the
    value of
    DF1's mapped attribute. To do that it says "give me the value of the
    TextData
    for DF1. You'll find it in the Map for this UserWindow (UW1), and its Map
    ID is
    3". When the runtime system goes to do this it expects to find a TextData
    in
    this "slot" of the map, but instead it picks up the integer which is
    mapped to
    RL2. At best this leads to bad data being returned; more likely you get a
    segfault and a crash.
    If DF1 was not a mapped attribute (say, a Rectangle) there would be no
    problem
    because there is no data mapped to a Rectangle. If instead of moving DF1
    you
    created a brand new DataField on the fly there would be no problem,
    because the
    dynamic DataField would not have any Map ID and so couldn't conflict with
    any
    IDs in UW2.
    So how do you solve this problem? This is exactly what Nested Windows are
    all
    about. While you can't move DF1 into the middle of UW2, you can nest
    UW1.
    This
    works because UW1 brings its map with it, and when you access DF1 it knows
    to
    look up its value in UW1's map.
    UserWindows are intended to be the "unit of compilabilty" that can be
    nested
    inside other UserWindows. It is dangerous to "transplant" anything from
    inside
    one UserWindow into another at runtime.
    (Note that you can't avoid this problem by cloning DF1 because the MapID
    gets
    copied along with it, and the clone will fail in the same way.)
    Further details explained in related technote 12448 'Sudden client
    partition
    crashes at runtime.'
    Technote 12448 Sudden client partition crashes at runtime
    Scenario : You have two UserWindows, A and B. When Window A starts up, it
    instantiates an instance of B and reparents some component of B into A's
    window
    hierarchy.
    This is not allowed and almost always leads to an error at best or at
    worse a
    segmentation fault.
    Here's why :
    When you compile a UserWindow in Forte, each "mapped attribute" (whether a
    form
    element or menu element) is assigned an internal ID which represents an
    offset into
    that UserWindow's table of mapped attributes. This offset is only valid
    in the
    context of the UserWindow in which it was compiled. If you detach a
    FieldWidget or
    MenuWidget from one compiled Window ("tmpMenu" for example) and then
    parent
    into another compiled window ("tmpWindow") the internal ID comes with it.
    When Forte tries to make use of that copied widget it uses the ID as an
    offset
    into tmpWindow's table of mapped attributes. But that copied offset is
    meaningless in the context of tmpWindow's table, so you get some kind off
    error.
    In this case it found that the data type of the variable in the slot
    wasn't
    what
    was expected. But you might even index off the end of the table and get a
    segmentation fault.
    There is nothing to prevent you from dynamically creating menu items and
    adding
    them to a window at runtime; that will work fine. Although of course you
    can't
    access them via mapped attributes, since those can only be created at
    compile time.
    But you are not allowed to reparent a widget from one compiled UserWindow
    into
    the hierarchy of another.
    More information may be found in technote 11225 'Don't reparent mapped
    Widgets
    between UserWindows at runtime'.
    Possible errorstacks seen at runtime instead of a complete crash or
    segmentation
    violation while you are illegally reparenting a widget or menuitem between
    windows
    at runtime:
    Map::SetSubjectData: Invalid conversion from map type 0 to subject type 22
    SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 3 in method
    qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [1001, 381]
    Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 3
    Error Time: Wed Aug 09 13:03:57
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition "testproject_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd,
    taskId =
    [D4914A10-36C1-11D4-91B3-419AA33BAA77:0x208:0xd.68]) in application
    "FTLaunch_cl0", pid 672 on node ONEWAY in environment Audi3M2Env.
    At 13:14 26.09.00 -0400, Adamek, Zenon wrote:
    Hi,
    It is the unfixed defect 53398. Please contact Forte support.
    Zenon
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Brenda Cumming [SMTP:brenda_cummingtranscanada.com]
    Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 1:15 PM
    To: Forte User group
    Subject: (forte-users) 3J=>3M new to me error
    Hi,
    We are in the process of going from 3J1 to 3.0.M.2, and I am getting
    this error that I am unfamiliar with on a GUI that works fine in 3J.
    It
    does not happen all the time, and I have been unable to establish the
    pattern that kicks it off. Has anyone seen this before?
    PS- this error is not occurring in the deployed (non-compiled) app,but
    when I am running locally from my workspace.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Bad parameter at location 6 in method
    qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [1001, 381]
    Detected at: qqrt_MapClassAccess::ProcessSubjectData at 6
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2,
    taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Can't find scope 20070 for a class.
    Class: qqsp_Exception
    Error #: [201, 11]
    Detected at: qqlo_ClassTableLoadScope at 1
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Because of a prior error, your workspace was set to
    read-only to prevent the application from attempting to write to the repository.
    The repository and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If
    your
    workspace contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure
    to save this work. First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and
    restart this application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode.
    Finally, import the changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 695]
    Detected at: qqrp_Session::IsDistributed
    Last TOOL statement: method PPMeasWin.
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Internal Error attempting to deserialize element
    (64,120684) (fetch bitmask is 0x20). Your workspace is now read-onlyto
    prevent
    the application from attempting to write to the repository. The
    repository
    and work you have saved to the repository are safe. If your workspace
    contains unsaved work, you may use the following procedure to savethis
    work.
    First, export the changed components. Then, shut down and restart this
    application and reopen this workspace in read-write mode. Finally, import the
    changed components and save your workspace.
    Class: qqrp_RepResourceException
    Error #: [1101, 61]
    Detected at: qqrp_LogicalSession::MaterializeObject
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition
    "ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    SYSTEM ERROR: Recursive Deserialization attempted, Internal Error!
    Class: qqsp_UsageException with ReasonCode: SP_ER_INVALIDSTATE
    Error #: [301, 231]
    Detected at: qqsp_DeSerializeDriver::Run at 1
    Error Time: Wed Sep 20 14:32:54
    Exception occurred (locally) on partition"ABSDevtStartUp_CL0_Client",
    (partitionId = 36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2, taskId =
    [36172000-5DA8-11D4-B1F0-14015EDAAA77:0x2da:0x2.25]) in
    application
    "Forte_cl0", pid 93 on node T5621 in environment AbisDMEnv.
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in anew
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to:forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • Using Forte 3.0 to deploy web app to iPlanet Web Server

    Is anyone familiar with using Forte 3.0 to develop/deploy a web application to an iPlanet Server?
    All I need is a simple walkthrough to create/deploy a "Hello World" app (it could be just a JSP) or a link to some document that covers this topic.
    Thanks

    For anyone who cares
    First make a web module, then make a web application and add the web module you made. When adding it the Mapping field should contain whatever context of the module is. Then deploy the application.

  • Can't Ping or access via SNMP Inside interface of 5505

    I have a remote site I'm trying to setup monitoring on and I can't get the inside interface to respond to a ping or SNMP requests.  I have tried everything I can find in the forums and on the web but this location will not cooperate.  I have full access to the ASA and to the inside network behind it.  IPSEC VPN tunnel is working perfectly.  I see the ping requests in the log on the ASA.  I turned on ICMP debugging and only see the echo request.. never an echo reply.  Below is a partial configuration.  If you need any more information, let me know.
    names
    name 192.168.0.0 Domain
    name 1.1.1.2 MCCC_Outside
    name 172.31.10.0 VLAN10
    interface Ethernet0/0
     switchport access vlan 2
    interface Ethernet0/1
    interface Ethernet0/2
    interface Ethernet0/3
    interface Ethernet0/4
    interface Ethernet0/5
    interface Ethernet0/6
    interface Ethernet0/7
    interface Vlan1
     nameif inside
     security-level 100
     ip address 192.168.23.1 255.255.255.0
    interface Vlan2
     nameif outside
     security-level 0
     ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
    boot system disk0:/asa847-k8.bin
    ftp mode passive
    clock timezone EST -5
    clock summer-time EDT recurring
    dns server-group DefaultDNS
     domain-name mtcomp.org
    object network obj-192.168.23.0
     subnet 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0
    object network Domain
     subnet 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
    object network 172.31.0.0
     subnet 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0
    access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 any
    access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 object Domain
    access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 object Domain
    access-list Outside_NAT0_inbound extended permit ip object Domain 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0
    access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 any
    access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip any 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 inactive
    no pager
    logging enable
    logging timestamp
    logging buffered debugging
    logging trap informational
    logging asdm informational
    logging device-id hostname
    logging host inside 192.168.x.x 17/1514
    mtu inside 1500
    mtu outside 1500
    no failover
    icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
    icmp permit any inside
    no asdm history enable
    arp timeout 14400
    no arp permit-nonconnected
    nat (inside,any) source static obj-192.168.23.0 obj-192.168.23.0 destination static Domain Domain no-proxy-arp route-lookup
    route outside MCCC_Outside 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1 1
    route outside 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.1 1
    route outside VLAN10 255.255.255.0 MCCC_Outside 1
    route outside Domain 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.1 1
    route outside 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 MCCC_Outside 1
    timeout xlate 3:00:00
    timeout pat-xlate 0:00:30
    timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
    timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
    timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
    timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
    timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
    timeout floating-conn 0:00:00
    dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
    user-identity default-domain LOCAL
    aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL
    aaa authentication enable console LOCAL
    http server enable
    http 192.168.1.81 255.255.255.255 inside
    http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
    http 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0 inside
    snmp-server host inside 172.x.x.x community ***** version 2c
    no snmp-server location
    no snmp-server contact
    snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
    crypto map outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
    crypto map outside_map 1 set pfs group1
    crypto map outside_map 1 set peer MCCC_Outside
    crypto map outside_map 1 set ikev1 transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
    crypto map outside_map 1 set ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256 AES192 AES 3DES DES
    crypto map outside_map interface outside
    management-access inside
    class-map inspection_default
     match default-inspection-traffic
    policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
     parameters
      message-length maximum client auto
      message-length maximum 512
    policy-map global_policy
     class inspection_default
      inspect dns preset_dns_map
      inspect ftp
      inspect h323 h225
      inspect h323 ras
      inspect ip-options
      inspect netbios
      inspect rsh
      inspect rtsp
      inspect skinny 
      inspect esmtp
      inspect sqlnet
      inspect sunrpc
      inspect tftp
      inspect sip 
      inspect xdmcp
      inspect icmp
    policy-map global-policy
    service-policy global_policy global
    prompt hostname context

    Hi,
    First of all let me clarify your trial.
    Where is your monitoring server?
    Is it behind inside or outside interface (please share ip adress)?
    From config it seems, it can be reach via outside interface. Then you have to make snmp check on outside interface, not on inside (cannot make a snmp/ping check on inside interface with request comming through outside inteface - it simply won't work).
    From the first check of routing table, I would suggest:
    delete : route outside MCCC_Outside 255.255.255.255 1.1.1.1 1 - doesn't make a sense route host address, when it's directly connected network (and more, route 1.1.1.2 to 1.1.1.1, when 1.1.1.1 is vlan2 interface)
    change : route outside 172.31.0.0 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.1 1; route outside Domain 255.255.0.0 192.168.1.1 1 - you should consider route it to 1.1.1.2 (if this is your next hop address at WAN).
    route outside VLAN10 255.255.255.0 MCCC_Outside 1 - why?
    I would use default route to somewhere at 1.1.1.0/24 range - next hop (router).
    HTH,
    Pavel

  • I am trying to build a basic TCL skeleton script that reads a remote SNMP OID and displays the value on the screen.

    I am trying to build a basic TCL skeleton script that reads a remote SNMP OID and displays the value on the screen.
    I don't want it to be an EEM Event, I just want to run it from the (tcl)# prompt.
    So I guess I'm asking if you can use cli_exec and other commands in the "namespace import ::cisco::eem::*" in a normal non-EEM script - can I do that?
    This is the error I get:
    OTN.159(tcl)#source flash:TCL_SNMP_Remote_Read.tcl
    invalid command name "::cisco::eem::event_register_none"             ^
    % Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
    What am I missing?
    =================  TCL_SNMP_Remote_Read.tcl  ==============================
    ::cisco::eem::event_register_none
    namespace import ::cisco::eem::*
    namespace import ::cisco::lib::*
    if [catch {cli_open} RESULT]
        { error $RESULT $errorInfo }
        else { array set cli1 $RESULT }
    if [catch {cli_exec $cli1(fd) "snmp get v2c 192.168.1.100 public timeout 1 oid 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0" } RESULT]
           { error $RESULT $errorInfo  }
           else { set SnmpSysDesc $RESULT }
    if [catch {cli_close $cli1(fd) $cli1(tty_id)} RESULT] {
                error $RESULT $errorInfo
    puts $SnmpSysDesc
    =========================================================================
    In the sho-run config I have:
    event manager directory user policy "flash:/"
    event manager session cli username "cisco"
    Any help to get me started would be greatly appreciated!
    Tim

    If you don't want an EEM policy, then don't use any of the EEM constructs.  Instead, all you need is this:
    set output [exec "snmp get v2c 192.168.1.100 public timeout 1 oid 1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0"]puts $output

  • Hi all. I have a factory unlocked iphone 4s. I'm from Belize but i'm going to visit Fort Lauderdale, FLA. How can I get data for my phone? I checked the web and only got 'not sure to don't know' answers. Whoever has done this please help me

    Hi All. I live outside of the USA and have an iPhone 4s. I'm going to Fort Lauderdale, FLA and want to data service for my iPhone ( navigation using google or imaps, browsing and voip ing when no wi fi available). I browsed the net but seems almost impossible. When I visited Toronto I was able to get data thru Koodo but I don't think this is offered in the USA. Anyone who has real experience with this please help. This is a situation that is best aided by persons who have experienced it. Thanks

    Have a look here:
    http://forums.macrumors.com/archive/index.php/t-982315.html

  • Forte Transaction Management & 2PC

    Forte Transaction Management & 2PC
    The main purpose of 2PC in a distributed transaction manager is
    to enable recovery from a failure that occurs during the window
    of transaction commit processing. The Forte transaction manager was built
    with this in mind but only with respect to the "volatile" (or "in memory")
    objects that Forte manages. What this implies is that because Forte stores
    objects in memory and not persistently on disk, the requirement of recovery
    for these objects is significantly reduced (if not eliminated all together).
    Forte follows a distributed 2PC model in that tasks and messages carry
    along with them transaction identification and, during commit processing,
    every distributed participant is polled for its availability to commit
    the transaction. Applications saving persistent data to disk during a
    distributed Forte transaction need to concern themselves with the potential
    for failure during the commit processing window. Forte's prepare phase polls
    each site (confirming a communications link with each distributed participant)
    but no prepare request goes to the database primarily because (in release 1 and
    2 of forte) no database supported a general distributed two-phase commit
    (one could take issue with that in the case of Sybase, but rather than debate
    this point, suffice it to say that the general direction in the industry for
    support of this functionality was through TP monitors -- more on that later).
    Once all sites are ready to commit Forte expects that the commit will
    complete successfully. If at this moment, for example, a participating
    Sybase server terminates (with data not yet committed) while a participating
    Oracle server has already committed its unit of work, then the outcome of
    the distributed transaction is inconsistent - if no one has yet committed
    Forte will still abort the transaction. This "window of inconsistency"
    is documented in the Forte TOOL manual.
    Mission critical applications that require distributed transactions can
    address this window of inconsistency in a number of ways:
    * Utilize a TP monitor such as Encina (see below)
    * Log distributed updates in an auxiliary database table (much like a
    distributed transaction monitor's transaction-state log). This approach has
    been the traditional banking application solution prior to the commercial
    availability of products like Encina, Tuxedo, TopEnd, etc.
    This solution is somewhat complex and is usually not generic enough
    so as not to have to change code every time a new table or database
    site is introduced into the application's data model.
    * Rearrange the data model in order to eliminate the need for distributed
    transactions. This is usually only a temporary solution (with smaller
    numbers of active clients) and cannot be applied to complex legacy systems.
    With the advent of the X/Open distributed transaction architecture (the
    XA Interface) more database vendors have found that by complying with the
    XA interface they can plug their database-specific implementation of
    transaction into a globally managed transaction, with commit and abort
    processing being conducted by a central coordinator. Of course, the
    overall transaction manager coordinating the global transaction must
    itself, persistently record the state of the different distributed
    branches participating in the transaction. A significant portion of
    the functionality provided by products such as Encina, Tuxedo, TopEnd and
    OpenTP1 is to provide exactly this global transaction management.
    Rather than extend the Forte distributed transaction manager with the
    functionality necessary to manage and recover distributed transactions
    that modify data on disk, Forte has chosen to integrate with the emerging
    set of commercial transaction monitors and managers. This decision was
    built into the original design of the Forte transaction model (using XA and
    early Tuxedo white-papers as guidelines):
    * In Forte release 2 an integration with Encina was delivered.
    * In January 1997 a press release announced an integration of
    OpenTP1 with Forte for release 3.
    * The Forte engineering staff is currently investing integration
    with other transaction management products as well.
    Neil Goodman,
    Forte Development.

    You don't. ("manage" a transaction)
    There is nothing really to "manage".
    A transaction is automatically started when you make any changes to data (e.g. fire off a DML statement).
    You simply needs to issue a COMMIT or ROLLBACK when needed. A COMMIT at the end of the business transaction and not before (i.e. no committing every n number of rows). A ROLLBACK when hitting an exception or business logic error that requires the uncommitted changes to be undone.
    That in a nutshell is it. It is that simple.
    Oracle also supports creating savepoints and rolling back only some changes made thus far in the transaction.
    The only other thing to keep in mind that a DDL in Oracle issues an implicit commit. Firing off a DDL with cause any exiting uncommitted transaction to be committed.
    Transaction "logic/management" should not be made more complex than this.

  • Interface errors (crc, in/output, collisions etc.) via snmp

    Hi,
    I'm trying to understand how to get interface errors via SNMP.  I do get stats via SNMP for ifInErrors / ifOutErrors etc, but I'm trying to get output via SNMP for the errors visible via the 'sh int x' command - CRC errors, input / output errors, collisions, runts. giants etc.).
    1) The SNMP ifInError / ifOutError seems to give an overall counter of all errors from the time the device has started - Am I correct about this?
    2) Is there any way I can get the interface-specific errors noted above via SNMP?
    Thanks,
    Mario

    Depends on the device and version of code, but most likely you will get what you want from the CISCO-IF-EXTENSION-MIB.  Look at objects like cieIfInRuntsErrs, cieIfInGiantsErrs, and cieIfInFramingErrs.  You will also get some ethernet-specific errors from the ETHERLIKE-MIB.

Maybe you are looking for

  • [Solved Kinda] Error Message when creating a LVM Snapshot.

    I upgraded my Arch Laptop this morning, which among other things, also had an update for lvm2. Anyways, as part of my backup strategy I create a LVM Snapshot of root and transfer that via rdiff-backup. This used to work no problem. But ever since the

  • I need a query to get all the values of taxes from the year 2008

    I have 2 tables in oracle 10.2.0.1 sm_coaster_bills( id_coaster_bills number, (pk) id_coaster number, (fk from table sm_coasters) period varchar2(6), (JANMAR or APRJUN or JULSEP or OCTDEC (months of trimenster)) year varchar2(4), (year when the bill

  • Service purchase order with quantity

    Hi all, Is it possible to create a service purchase order with quantity ? Our client is using sap b1 2005b pl39. Expecting you all valuable reply. Jeyakanthan

  • How do I clear visited site history?

    sites visited last week show in a list in FireFox. l can clear the search list, but not those sites typed in directly or accessed via links. thank you.

  • Extproc crashes when calling external routine

    Can anyone point me to documentation on the causes of extproc.exe crashing when trying to invoke an external procedure? The standard documentation set isn't too helpful for debugging such a problem. I have been able to call one external procedure. Wi