Rebate Processing - Value Difference -Verfication level and Sales Volume

Dear All ,
We are using standard rebate process - Customer Rebates and we have encountered the following issue .
1. The Rebate agreement was created on 01/12/2010 with validity from 01/12/2001 , valid through 31/03/2010.The Rebate recipient was not activated for Rebate in the month of DEC 2009 and was activated on 15/01/2010 . We have executed VBOF and found that the Accruals are calculated from 15/01/2010 till date which is 25,010 USD ( for the invoices which are created from 15/01/2010) but it is not taken into consideration of the invoices which are created in the month of December 2009.
We have checked and calculated manually the accruals which is amounting to 35,575 USD for the period ( 01/12/2009 to 14/01/2010) . This accrual amount is not updated for the agreement .
Can any one give inputs on this issue.
Thanks in advance .
Regards
Veera
Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:07 AM
Dear All ,
I have executed the VBOF couple of times and the sales volume is updated correctly now - 51,277.20 USD . but when i selected the agreement and clicked on verfication level it is not showing up all the invoices and the value shown is 43,025.10 USD . There is difference of 8252.10.
Now the issue is how do i get all the invoices in the verfication level.
Can any one give inputs on this .
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Regards
Veera
Edited by: veera PV on Mar 6, 2010 11:08 AM

Hello,
please check this thred Re: VBOF Issue related to updating Old Invoices after activating Rebate Check.
Best regards,
Ivano.

Similar Messages

Account Creation - Badi for Default values for BP Role and Sales Area

Hi all,
my requirement regards the possibility to create a new prospect (a link should be available in the navigation bar or create section).
Logically, a bp role as "Prospect" and particoular sales area should be created automatically.
I created an implementation for the BADI definition "BADI_CRM_BP_UIU_DEFAULTS". But don't know how to create the default values for BP role and Sales area:
In my code
assign cr_me->('VIEW') to <lv_view_name>.
if sy-subrc ne 0.
exit.
endif.
lv_viewname = <lv_view_name>.
case lv_viewname.
when 'AccountDetails.htm'.
I obtain the viewname "AccountDetails" , the related context "Header". After I don't know how to proceed to obtain the related entities through the relationship BuilRolesRel and BuilSalesArrangementRel.
Am I following the right way? Is there another solution to prepare the output for default values?
Any kind of suggestion will be appreciated.
Regards, Roberto

go to spro>cross-application components>sap busines partner>business partner> basic settings>field groupings>Configure Field Attributes per BP Role
Double click the business role which you want to customaze (e.g. 'A') and change the proper settings.
Regards.

Inventory value difference between SAP and leagcy system

Hello Gurus,
My client has inventory value difference in SAP and Legacy system during cutoff activities due to following reason.
a. Rounding off
b. GRN done
C. Goods issue done
Can I do the manual posting for Value difference?.if yes then how?
Please guide me on the same.
Regards
SAP FI

Hi
It is not just difference in Valuation...
1. If GRN is done in Legacy system, you will have to upload stock in SAP also
2. If Goods issue is done in Legacy system after you got the stock file, then you will also have to post Goods issue in SAP
The Qty uploaded should match between Legacy and SAP systemj... If the qty matches and difference is in value, you will have to decide which value is final i.e. Legacy value or SAP value.... Accordingly, you will have to pass a JV in Legacy system (If SAP value is Final) or in SAP system (If legacy value is final)
BR, Ajay M

Report - quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice?

Hello experts,
My client use u201EProof of deliveryu201D t-code: VLPOD. There is always quantity and value difference between delivery and invoice.
Do you know any report which will show this differences between delivery and invoice?
Best regards,
Maciej

Hi,
Note 867678 - Proof of delivery (POD), delivery and billing document will help you to understand POD flow.
You have the tcode VLPODF/VLPODL/VLPODA, but perhaps they will not help you. So, as the before note suggests you, you can use the tables VBFA, LIKP, LIPS, VBRK, VBRP, TVPOD and TVPODG to do your own report.
I hope this helps you
Regard,
Eduardo

NEF exposure value difference in Photoshop and Aperture

We shoot paintings with a Nikon D2X and 4 SB-800 flash units. We keep a Macbeth in the frame until we get an LAB value of around 85-90 (RGB around 230, 230, 230) in the white patch. Until recently we have used Nikon Capture to control the camera and then opened the images in Photoshop (by way of Adobe Camera Raw) to read the exposure values. On our last shoot we moved to Aperture. Testing had previously shown a variation in the range of three LAB points for previously shot NEFs between Aperture's raw interpreter and Adobe Camera Raw. When we returned to the office and began to process the images we discovered that NEF files opened in Aperture showed the LAB exposure of 85-90 we saw in the field, but when the same NEF files are opened in Photoshop, the white patches are blown out. If we open them in Aperture and transfer them to Photoshop as TIFFs the exposure is the same as Aperture shows -- 85 to 90. As an experiment we opened one in Nikon Capture NX. The values match Photoshop and not Aperture.
If anyone is interested in helping on the diagnosis, here is a link to one of our NEFs with the offending white patch:
http://www.catalogueraisonne.org/tmp/2008-06-19_144.NEF
Does anyone have an explanation of this huge difference of exposure values between Adobe and Capture NX on one side and Aperture on the other?

Hi,
Well I've downloaded your NEF file but I'm afraid I'm not seeing the difference that you are. I've loaded the image into Capture NX2, Aperture 2.1, and Lightroom 2 Beta (which is, in effect, using the ACR engine. There is a slight difference in values between them all, but only very slight. Aperture gives readings of 95.3% for luminance; LR gives me R:98%, G:99% and B:99% and Capture NX 2 gives me Readings that average 254 (which must be 99%). None of them are therefore technically blown out, however both LR and CNX2 show them the white patch as blown out if you switch on the lost highlights indicator. Aperture doesn't show them as blown out.
So the difference range is a matter of 4% roughly, which I think can simply be put down to slight differences in RAW converters and the contract curves that they apply.

Material Value difference between FI and MM

Dear Experts,
The balance of perticular material not matiching with my FI gl balance (MC.9 and FBL3N). I am getting FI balance from FBL3N amd sort it by the meterial.
Now how I reconcile the difference amount.
Sourav
FICO Consultant

Dear:
We once faced the same issue and were manged to resolve it. We first sorted all GLs in which postings are routed through MM. No direct entry is allowed in these GLs. Documents types are set by default e.g WE for good receipts e.t.c. Then we executed these GLs in FS04 to track the changes made in their GL master for checking post automatically tick removal . We found some GLs in which post automatically tick was removed for sometime and some manual adjustment were posted into them by CO module. If you find any such changes in GL master record ,then select these GLs and execute them in FBL3N , look for any abnormal posting with different document type like SA e.t.c. In this way you can do the reconciliation between material ledger and FI ledger.
Regards

Size difference in diskset and logical volume

Hi,
Created a disk set and a simple mirror LV on the set. The disk had EFI label, so
once the disk is added to the set it repartitions again and stores state database replica
in s6 (for EFI). The remainder of the space on each drive is placed into slice 0
If I do prtvtoc on the /dev/md/map/rdsk/d18 and /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0
the size varies or the available size on the disk doesn't match to the lv size.
-bash-4.0# prtvtoc /dev/md/map/rdsk/d18
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 0 00 32768 1966080 1998847
-bash-4.0# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0
* /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0 partition map
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 4 00 32818 1997485 2030302
6 4 01 34 32784 32817
8 11 00 2030303 16384 2046686
In the 2nd o/o you can find the sector count 1997485 but in the lv,
the sector count is 1966080.
But this is not the case for lv on VTOC labeled disk. There both of them match.
-Manjunath

Hi,
Created a disk set and a simple mirror LV on the set. The disk had EFI label, so
once the disk is added to the set it repartitions again and stores state database replica
in s6 (for EFI). The remainder of the space on each drive is placed into slice 0
If I do prtvtoc on the /dev/md/map/rdsk/d18 and /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0
the size varies or the available size on the disk doesn't match to the lv size.
-bash-4.0# prtvtoc /dev/md/map/rdsk/d18
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 0 00 32768 1966080 1998847
-bash-4.0# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0
* /dev/rdsk/c6t60000970000194900391533030344631d0 partition map
* First Sector Last
* Partition Tag Flags Sector Count Sector Mount Directory
0 4 00 32818 1997485 2030302
6 4 01 34 32784 32817
8 11 00 2030303 16384 2046686
In the 2nd o/o you can find the sector count 1997485 but in the lv,
the sector count is 1966080.
But this is not the case for lv on VTOC labeled disk. There both of them match.
-Manjunath

Sales Volume in rebate management

Rebate is based on validity period and sales volume,we can define the validity period but where we will give this total sales volume.
amit

When you first create a rebate agreement, the system prompts you to specify a rebate agreement type. The rebate agreement type you specify determines which data the system automatically proposes for the corresponding rebate agreement. For example, the system can propose
·        which condition types you can use in an agreement
·        which validity period the system automatically proposes for an agreement
·        which status is required before an agreement can be processed for payment.
·        which rebate agreement types are defined in Customizing for Sales and Distribution.
Agreement Types in the Standard Version
The standard version of the SAP System includes the following rebate agreement types (the table shows the corresponding condition types):
Agreement type          Basis of rebate        condition type
0001                       Customer/material        (% rebate)BO01
                            Customer/rebate group    (% rebate)BO01
0002                      Customer/material     (quantity dependent)
                                                                          BO02
0003                          Customer                       (% rebate)
                                                                          BO03
0004                       Customer hierarchy          (% rebate)
                                                                          BO04
                          Cust. hierarchy/material       (% rebate)
                                                                          BO05
0005                   Sales volume independent         BO06
Hope this classification will help.
Regards,
Siddharth.

Difference between Valuated and Non valuated Sale order stock

Hi All,
Can anybody tell me the difference between the above said subject with the steps involved in each scenario.
That is valuated sale order stock and Non valuated sale order stock in Product cost by Sale Order.
With Journal entries at each step and whether any WIP or variances at Production order level and sale order level and all the financial entries related to them
Thanks in Advance,
Ravi Kumar

Hi Shail,
Thans for your inputs,
But I wanted to know it in more detail. In what scenarios they are used with financial entries in both the cases.
I will give you my scenario. It goes like this,
My client is in pipe coating business, who receives pipes from customers and does only coating work(which is considered as service) and despatches it to the customer. this process is carried on the basis of work order(Sale order).
Now Production order is created and work is done on that with reference to Sale order for that particular customer.
So the pipe which my client receives should be non valuated stock as it will not be a raw material to them and the cost incurred on it is booked on production order like chemicals as raw material consumption, activity cost etc.
now in this scenario just tell me how and at which stage FI entries get generated at Production order and Sale order level, and also at wat level Standard cost estimate should be created i,e at production order level or sale order level(sale order cost estimate).
Will there be any entries at goods isssue and GR against production order. If no then how the COGM account will get hit.
Please tell me this scenario in both cases Valuated sale order stock and Non valuated sale order stock with financial entries in Sale order costing.
Thanks & Regards,
Ravi Kumar

Normal and Extended Rebates Processing

Hi All,
Can somebody please explain in detail, the difference between Normal and Extended Rebates Processing? Please provide some docs or links.
Regards,
Raghav

Hi Raghav,
Following explains how to crete a rebate agreement, test it using a sales order and billing it. Then settling it partially or fully using a rebate credit memo. Please use the basic procedure and tweak your IMG settings according to your unique requirements.
Rebate processing:
1. First requirement is that the rebate processing must be active for
a. the customer ( check in customer master) ,
b. for the billing type ( check in IMG > Billing > rebate processing > active rebate processing > select billing documents for rebate processing. )
c. For the sales organizatin:
( check in IMG > Billing> rebate processing > active rebate processing > Active rebate processing for sales org. )
2. Next create a rebate agreement For this ust T-code VB01. For the rebate agreement type you can choose either 0001
( group rebate ) or 0002 material rebate or 0003 ( customer rebate ) etc
b. Enter your rebate conditions. Dont forget to enter the accrual rate here.
3. Now test your rebate functionality : create a sales order for the particular customer, sales org ( ensure that the billing type used in your sales order is relevant for rebate) . Create outbound delivery, transfer order to do picking and post goods issue.
4. Now go to Tcode VB03 and check your rebate by choosing conditions , selecting the condition line and choosing payment data. You will see that the accruals and business volume are updated when accounting doc is created for billing.
5. Settling your rebates:
Once your rebates have been accrued you need to settle the rebate.
For this first release the rebate for settlement by using Tcode VB02. As a trial basis choose B ( you can choose other settings based on your requirement) and choose Create manual accrual. Now enter the amount to be paid and save the rebate agreement.
6. Next display your rebate agreement using Tcode VB03.
Enter your rebate agreement number . Next choose rebate payments > Rebate documents and select partial settlement. Click on the choose button to note down your credit request number.
7. Use Tcode VA02 and release the billing block for your credit request. ( use item overview tab)
8. Now use VF01 to create a rebate credit memo by entering the credit memo request number and save it
9. Now release the credit memo to accounting using vf02.
Following is complete config guide of extended rebates:
http://help.sap.com/bp_bblibrary/600/Documentation/G63_BB_ConfigGuide_EN_US.doc.
Thanks!
Preethi.
Edited by: preethi R on Nov 26, 2008 7:39 AM

Issue on Indirect Sales Rebate Processing

Hi Gurus,
I am working on Indirect Sales Rebate Processing in ECC 6.0, I got Struck at Updating of Indirect Sales info structure S961 at Transaction RBT_ENH_GEN where in background Billing Documents has to be generated, which is not happenning.
As this in High Priority, please someone help me in this regard.
Will be appreciated for an Immediate reponse.
Thanks in Advance
Raj

Hi Leo,
The scenario with coupons / points is managed in SAP CRM and is part of Loyalty Management:
/people/bhushan.khadpe/blog/2008/11/13/sap-crm-70-loyalty-management-high-volume-execution
I am sorry to say that the indirect sales rebate, extended or not, will not solve your need.
Indirect rebates are used to credit distributors based on sales done on third-party customers (the customers of the distributors). These sales will be registered in SAP using a "pendulum list" and indirect rebate agreement give credit based on indirect sales volume (these are proforma billing documents generated from the pendulum list data).
My understanding is that any company that wants to manage coupons / points natively in the SAP ERP has to program this functionality itself in the ERP or to interface SAP ERP with a specialized external application.
SAP recommended solution is to implement SAP CRM, but IMHO that is an overkill for many medium size companies.
I wish there would be a way to implement specific CRM functions natively in SAP ERP, like Trade Promotion Management or Points Management, so the Customer could stick with a single ERP / CRM system
Best Regards,
Franck

Difference between Sales Contract and Sales Agreement

Hi,
I am confuse with contract and agreement. Please let me know what is exact difference between Sales Contract and Sales Agreement, when the sales contract will be used and in which real time situation, the sale agreement will come into picture.
Please do needful.
Thanks and Regards,
Venkat

Hi Venkat,
See documentation http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/46/377a08b2ea4bee8eb9f47e5c067064/frameset.htm for details on difference between contract and sales agreement - basically sales agreement dont have a quantity or value whereas contracts do. Agreements are mainly for pricing terms. These pricing terms can then be brought into the sales/service transaction.
There are standard transaction types for these WK1 WV in ERP and CRM.
Hope this helps.
Kind regards,
Vanessa

Difference between sales document and sales document Header

Hi everyone,
what the difference difference between sales document and sales document Header if look at this equation
VBBE-VBELN= VBAK-VBELN
VBBW is sales document requirement
VBELN is a sales document
VBAK sales document header
then what the difference ales document and sales document Header
kindly assist me to guide the differences
thanks

hi
SAP has differenciated various sales scenarios into various salses documents. basing on the scenario & circumstances you will be having a sales document to use.
sales document header:which carries the properties of a sales document lie CMR MMR CMIR & Pricing conditions etc...
this will be applicable to entire sales document
by sales document we mean the total data carried by a particular document - header; item & schedule line data. each carries its own information to complete the sales document with out errors.
VBBE-VBELN= VBAK-VBELN stands for schedles in the sales order document & document header.
hope this clears your issue
balajia

Enhancement to update sale volume for rebates

Dear All,
We have a senerio for sale voume rebate process that only above 50000 sale value will add up in sale volume in rebate agreement for accrual process.
Can we do this through standerd or through enhancement?
please help.
Regards'
Kumar

Hi Mukul,
Mark your condition type VALUE SCALE and Check Value as A.
Update condition record in Rebate agreement. Then in Scale section mark it applicable as FROM 50,000 INR with respective Rate.
And it will work as per your requirement.
When you will do Settlement of the Rebate Agreement it will create Credit Memo only if Value is more than 50000 INR.
Regards,
MJ.

Excise duty difference in VF02 and J1iin

Hi Experts,
We are getting Excise duty values difference in VF02 and J1IIN.We are getting this error for few cases only, and it is not specific to sales org or document type.We are not able to regenerate the same case in development as it is exception cases.
Please guide on this matter.
Regards
BK GAIKWAD

Dear Laxmipatiji,
Thanks to prompt replay,
1) Domestic scenario
2) Billing & excise invoice date are same
3) Not Specific to particular material type or sales organization or material
Regards
BK GAIKWAD

Rebate Processing - Value Difference -Verfication level and Sales Volume

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for