Recommendations on monitor calibrators?

Hi,
I've tried the color calibrator in OS X, and I've also tried 3rd party apps like "SuperCal." I can get my monitors "close" and "good enough" but now I want "better" or as close to "perfect" as possible. That is where a HARDWARE color calibrator comes into play.
Most of which you dangle then on your monitor as the computer flashes colors on the monitor in which the receiver reads. Plugs in via USB. I've seen them priced anywhere from $50, to thousands of dollars.
My question is, what brand/model will give me the best "bang" for my "buck" if I want one that is both Mac and PC compatible, and costs around or less then $100.
I've looked at review sites, (a lot of which seem to be back in the days when CRT's where most common) and I can't seem to find a source that "points one out" for me that I can depend on working today with all of my LCD's. The top three screens I need to calibrate are my 13" MacBook Pro screen, my 24" Dell 2408WFP that I use with my MBP in clamshell mode, and my mothers 24" iMac. Possibly the LCD I used with my old PC, too.
I'm hoping someone here may be help to help, or get me started looking in the right direction. Whatever the case, I will be sure to reply back once I choose one, and will post a review on it for anyone else that is in the same situation as me and is looking for something like this.
Thanks!
Scott

Actually, that magenta shift issue is common to laptop displays. It depends greatly on where the native white point of your display happens to be, and this can vary greatly. For this reason, X-Rite generally recommends calibrating laptop displays to their "Native" white point. Try using that and see if the magenta tint doesn't disappear.
The native white point on my last MBP, which was a 15" Mid-2009 unibody, was around 7400k. Calibrating it to 6500 or lower definitely gave the display a magenta tint. My new MBP has a native white point of 6400k, which obviously calibrates very nicely to 6500k. This is the first MacBook or PowerBook that has had a native white point close to 6500.
This issue is one of the reasons that laptop displays, even the newer MacBooks which have about the best color I've ever seen on a laptop, can't be used for serious color correction. (Which is why I find the laptop matte/glossy debate amusing, but I digress.) I calibrate it so it's in the ballpark so I can make educated judgements when I'm out and about shooting and uploading, but when it's time to do any serious correcting or printing, it's always with an external display. I now have the best match I've ever had between my laptop and my external display in terms of color, but I still wouldn't use it to color correct anything I'm sending off for print.

Similar Messages

  • Recommend a monitor calibration tool please

    I use a MacBook Pro. 15" And Aperture. What units are folks using to calibrate their monitors?
    Spyder3?
    X-Rite EODIS2 Eye-One Display 2?
    Thanks for the help.

    6500 white point and 2.2 gamma are recommended.
    There are two principles to understand -
    1. Always purchase a proper spectrophotometer, not a mere colorimeter. The spectral radiation curves for different types of emittive devices are unsurprisingly different. CRT's are different from LCD's and LCD's are different from LED's. These differences are better captured by a spectrophotometer, whereas a colorimeter is optimised and the difficulty is that what it is optimised for is not documented. The X-Rite Monitor Optimiser was a colorimeter, and it worked OK for CRT's but not for LCD's when they came along. The GretagMacbeth Spectrolino and Eye-One could capture the spike red spectral curve in LCD's better. Today, the discussion is whether a colorimeter works well with the green in LED's but I don't follow this except out of the corner of an eye.
    2. As long as you have a colour display, calibrated to a stable condition, and characterised in an ICC type MNTR Monitor profile, you can set the white point and gamma to what you want since the ICC framework will match through the D50 illuminant Profile Connection Space virtually. The difficult part is not the ICC framework, which is based on a mathematical model of the illuminant, but how you set up your studio lighting and studio viewing box which are physical light sources and not mathematical illuminants. The original idea is that you set up your studio light sources to 5000 - 5500 Kelvin along the lines of the D50 illuminant, but there are as many theories as there are colour consultants.
    /hh

  • Recommend Performance monitor for interface

    Hi,
    I am configuring my network monitoring application to monitor my Cisco Routers and I am looking for recommended (best practice) thresh hold values for following the interface parameters (Ethernet interface):
    Bandwidth Utilization (%)
    Error rate (%)
    Package discarded (%)
    Any help, documents or advice  would be appreciated
    Regards,
    Screech

    Here is my 2 cents
    Don't think there is a one size fits all
    Trunks and other connection between network devices
    Bandwidth  Utilization 60% on full duplex 40% on half
    Error rate  0
    Package discarded 0
    These interface should be absolutely clean, and you beter check Transmit load and Receive Load rather then Utilization
    Userports
    Bandwidth  Utilization 60%  on full duplex 40% on half
    Error rate  5
    Package discarded 5
    Server ports
    Bandwidth  Utilization 60%  on full duplex 40% on half
    Error rate  1
    Package discarded 1
    I would say it is pointless to poll and monitor all ports for bandwith utilisation all the time.
    Using rmon or something else to set (a couple of) thresholds and monitor that  is a much better idea
    Not sure about a tool that could used for that however.
    Cheers
    Michel

  • Can someone recommend a monitor

    I have a PB AL 1.67ghz. I want to get an inexpensive 17-19 inch monitor to use at the desk with it.
    Can someone recommend a good monitor. Not looking to spend to much.$200-$300 if possible.
    Thanks

    Hi musicmaker --
    You know the drill, the whole cost versus features versus what you need it for calculus, etc., but I have a friend who just picked up a Dell 17" for $279, and she likes it very much as sort of an all around utility monitor. Macworld gave a pretty good review too: http://www.macworld.com/2006/04/reviews/dell1707fp/index.php
    Something to consider.
    -- JDee

  • Recommended Studio Monitors

    Can anyone recommend a pair of good studio monitors?
    Theses are the features I would like:
    -Under $200.
    -Optical in.
    -Flat response for accurate mixing, (but if possible also have them sound good (full) playing songs out of iTunes.
    -They should be powered monitors.
    Also, someone recommended these to me:
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/MA15D/
    And these (don't know if these work or are BS and a waste of money:
    http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/MoPAD/
    Thanks in advance for any suggestions or input.
    Paul

    Thanks to everyone who replied. I really appreciate all your input. Excellent suggestions all around.
    To respond to a few comments:
    What I also like, but is usually not popular with the pros, are the tone controls. When I'm recording, the tone levels are centered so I get a flat response, but when listening to prerecorded stuff the bass and treble controls get "hard right".....just to kick it up a little......I mean alot.
    Yes, that would make them perfect for recording and listening to itunes which is what I want (unless I go with two separate sets, one for listening & one flat for recording).
    Take care looking at the term "powered", cheaper will have 1 amplifier, and second unit will be a satellite. Better choices have amp in each unit.
    Great point. I did not think of that and will definitely keep it in mind while researching speakers.
    Why "optical in"? Few serious audio products use this format, go 1/4 inch instead.
    Because, I am afraid I will get noise going out of the 1/8th inch out of my PowerMac G5. I have a firebox that I could go out of but would rather not. Optical out should be as clean as you can get. Is there any reason not to use it?
    Lastly, the suggestion to spend more now and enjoy for a long time is usually my motto when making purchases as well, (look at the computers I own:) I may just do that with the speakers as well. I saved the links to the speakers you guys posted and will check them out soon.
    Thanks again guys:)
    Paul

  • Recommended LCD monitor for Mac Minin 1.42

    I'm trying to find a LCD monitor in the 20"-22" range for my Mac Mini 1.42 that is known to work out of the box using DVI without having to tweak things (i.e. SwitchResX). I have already purchased and returned a HP w2007. My next choice was a ViewSonic VX2035wm but reading this forum it is also known to have timing problems. I'd rather not spend the $$$ for an Apple monitor (not even sure if they work). Would like to keep the cost below $300.
    Thanks

    You might find the page at http://www.freewebs.com/themagius/macintoshmini.htm helpful since it was compiled for the original 1.25 and 1.42 PPC minis. It does, however, list only DVI.
    VGA displays were less troublesome, since they almost all work with the mini, though some were apt to display dim or greyish output.

  • Recommendations for Monitoring Tomcat?

    The best I could find on this forum regarding monitoring TomCat is this thread from 2009:
    Monitoring Tomcat
    which describes to use a Virtual Agent and probably the mentioned Ant Tasks.
    Is this Virtual Agent really necessary or do we have any pointers describing the ServerStats side of requirements for native JMX in OATS 9.30 ?
    The Apache TomCat website [1] has documentation on how to enable JMX and configure the RMI ports.
    This also covers the configuration of JMX remote Ant Tasks which requires to copy catalina-ant.jar from $CATALINA_HOME/lib to $ANT_HOME/lib.
    The following Java World article talks about three other JARs that are needed for monitoring TomCat with MC4J [2].
    You need the catalina.jar, catalina-cluster.jar, and catalina-optional.jar files (located in %CATALINA_HOME%\server\lib\) specified in the classPathEntries property.
    Are these the configuration JARs that need to be added for Apache Tomcat to OATS ?
    As a last resort, would any of the frameworks discussed in the introduction of the JavaWorld article [2] be suitable for OATS ?
    * XMOJO
    * jManage
    * MX4J
    * Spring JMX
    * JMX-HTML adaptor
    * MC4J JMX Console
    Kind regards,
    Stefan
    [1] http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-6.0-doc/monitoring.html
    [2] http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-08-2005/jw-0801-jmx.html?page=4

    Matrox MXO...Matrox MXO 2...AJA I/O HD. All those work on a laptop and have Component outs. MXO 2 and I/O HD have HDMI outs.
    Shane

  • Recommendations for monitoring 16:9 Anamorphic

    I'm working more and more in 16:9 anamorphic for widescreen tradeshow displays. My system, however, is DV, with an NTSC 4:3 monitor... so when working in 16:9, the display is "squished".
    I have a 26" lcd tv with VGA, component and HDMA inputs. Is there anyway to use it or any other better idea to be able to monitor the work in wide format, other than what I see on the Canvas in FCP?

    Matrox MXO...Matrox MXO 2...AJA I/O HD. All those work on a laptop and have Component outs. MXO 2 and I/O HD have HDMI outs.
    Shane

  • Can anyone recommend good monitors?

    Hi all,
    I'm looking for monitors for my mini studio. I haven't got a very good room, soundwise, but compared to mixing through headphones, monitors are a lot better. I run my little studio on a Mac mini, using LE7, doing mostly remixes and some additional production, so my level isn't professional, rather 'advanced hobby'.
    Also, I'm not TOO fuzzy with having the perfect pair, I just want to them to make more justice than the headphones.
    The price range I had in mind is ±20 % of 3500 SEK, 250 GBP, 430 USD.
    Any suggestions?

    My advice: save up until you can afford to get proper monitors. You do yourself no favours with low to mid-range monitors, which is what you'd be looking at in that price range.
    I agree with the previous poster that for a small room, a 5" woofer is plenty sufficient.
    I would suggest you save up for the current model KRK V4. They are not cheap (about $800/pair), but they are GREAT monitors, with plenty of bass, and a nice, even response.
    Monitor quality does not increase linearly with price. At the low end, a little extra cash does not buy you much higher quality. But once you get above a certain threshold, then you're talking about a serious upgrade. For me, the KRK V4 is right at that threshold.

  • Recommendation for external monitor with good audio?

    I've got a MacBook Pro, about three years old or so.  I also have a new iMac.
    I'm happy with the audio on the iMac.  Good enough that I don't need external speakers to listen to iTunes.
    I have a weekend place and when I go, I only take my MacBook Pro with me ... and I miss the 21" screen and the better audio from my iMac.
    Can anyone recommend a monitor for MacBook Pro that is just as good as the iMac, especially with regards to the sound?
    Ideally under $300.

    Any with built-in HDMI should work and 1080p.   ViewSonic, NEC, Sony, LG, and Samsung.  Viewsonic and NEC may also have color correction capabilities.    Make sure your Mac is one of the ones with built-in audio over mini-Displayport or has Thunderbolt or HDMI to connect:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4241
    If it does not have audio, and is a mini-Displayport only, see this tip for alternatives:
    https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-2821

  • Color calibrating monitor

    Hello, I am new to the pro photography/editing world and I am looking for recommendations for monitor color calibration systems.  I am currently using a 13 inch macbook air.  There are so many on the market I don't know where to start.  I am looking for something that can automatically adjust the calibration for whatever light I happen to be sitting in at the moment- perhaps something with a sensor?  I am not trying to break the bank.  I see that the Spyder4 and X-Rite are popular.  If you can give me your recommendations/model name that would be great!!

    Keith_Reeder wrote:
    Not sure why you'd think this was an on-topic question for a Lightroom forum?
    Not sure why you think correct display of your files is irrelevant? Are all hardware-related discussions off-topic? All discussions on color management? If you think that, I suggest you just stay out of those threads and concentrate on the threads you find relevant.
    Meanwhile, I'll be happy to answer.
    Generally, you have the right idea in that your working environment will influence your perception. But an automatic adjustment of your calibration introduces so many uncontrollable factors that it's practically unworkable. It will only confuse you. Some calibrators have an option to adjust display brightness automatically, but the general advice is to disable that.
    Concentrate on controlling your environment as far as you can. It's much more important to tune your calibration targets so that you get a good match to printed output. Ideally, screen white point should be a visual match to paper white - and this is where the environment will influence your perception. Similarly for contrast/black point. Start at 120 cd/m² and 6500K, and a contrast range (if available) of around 350:1. Adjust as needed to get a match.
    Some will probably say a laptop display is not worth calibrating at all. I disagree, but don't expect too much. One basic problem is that most laptop displays are TN-based with very restricted viewing angles, to the point where the top of the screen is too dark and the bottom washed out. But if you get a calibrator now you still have that if you decide to get a better monitor later.
    To be specific, I'd recommend the x-rite i1 Display Pro at around $200. This is generally the best third-party calibrator currently on the market. A more inexpensive solution is the ColorMunki Display, which uses the same sensor but somewhat restricted software. The Spyders are good too, but not quite as reliable and consistent at the same price point.

  • Connecting 2 LCD monitors to my Macbook?

    Hello Everyone.
    Ok, before I go poking around and stuff something up, can someone please answer my following questions. I am wanting to connect two LCD 22inch monitors to my Macbook Pro.
    1. How do I do this?
    2. Instead of buying Apple screens, are there any other good LCD monitors that will do just a good a job?
    Please help.
    Thanks....I love my MAC

    1. http://www.matrox.com/graphics/en/corpo/products/home.php
    check graphic expansion modules
    2. for serious work I would strongly recommend eizo monitors. current apple displays simply cant compete with them. They are very outdated and therefore overpriced. they have poor adjusting possibilities..in both picture and stands.
    tutmir

  • If I purchase a non-apple monitor and connect to my Macbook Pro, will I be able to put it to sleep?

    I'm looking to buy a monitor or two for my laptop (Retina Macbook Pro 2013 model (not the latest one)). There are a few things that I would like to understand.
    - If I'm going to get the Apple Cinema Display, I know I will be using thunderbolt to connect my laptop to it. If I get a non-Apple monitor though, what will I be using? HDMI? also thunderbolt? is thunderbolt exclusive to Apple or can non-Apple monitors use thunderbolt as well.
    - As far as sizing and resolution, I know that I have to pay attention to the resolution of the monitor I'm getting to make sure I'm getting the quality I'm looking for as opposed to just looking at the size of it. Ideally, I would want my monitor to look like my Retina Macbook, whats the resolution I should be looking for? Is Retina too much for a monitor? if so, whats a good resolution for a monitor that my Macbook can support fully, what size will work without reducing the quality? does dual screens (even if the second screen was the laptop screen) reduce the quality of one of the monitors?
    - I don’t know if this an exclusive thing to when using an Apple monitor but, would I be able to put my laptop to sleep (actually close the lid) while it mirrors to the monitor? Is this only possible when using thunderbolt and therefore it can only happen with Apple Cinema Display? or can it happen with other cables?
    - Finally what are your recommendations for monitors that are good. I'm debating between one 27/30 inch monitor and two 21/23 inch display. LCD? LED?

    This is more about your modem then anything. Sometimes you'll need to unplug and plug back in your modem. Consider it a glitch from the ISP or just the modem in general.
    when I need to turn something off then on I try the modem first. This when I'm not doing any ware and tare to the device.

  • External Monitor for MacBook Pro 13"

    Hello, I know there has been a number of threads on this topic, but I haven't found my answer yet.
    I am looking for a third party external monitor for my 13" MacBook Pro. I read a lot of text on my computer so it is important that the text is sharp. I have tried a couple Samsung monitors so far and the text is far from sharp and in fact it is outright hard on the eyes.
    Currently, I am using a 23" Samsung SyncMaster SA550 with a HDMI/MiniDisplay 6" cable, I am using it as the primary display with my laptop closed and the resolution is set to 1080p. It's almost as though the video card is not powerful enough to drive this monitor - is that possible?
    I have two questions:
    1) Is there anything I can do to get this monitor to display clearer text?
    2) Can anyone recommend a monitor that would display clearer text?
    Thanks! Any info would be appreciated!

    The only reason I thought of suggesting 1920x1080 was becaue I looked up the specs on your 23" Samsung SyncMaster SA550 and see it only has vga and hdmi input.  I suspect that because it's hdmi input the EDID info tells Displays to add 1080i and 1080p to the resolutions and suppresses the 1920x1080.  It's why I wasn't sure it would be there in the first place.
    So have you tried 1080i just to see what kind of results you get?  And to cover all possibilities have you tried using the VGA connection?
    It may just be that what you see on this particular monitor is as good as it gets.

  • I need advice on buying a new computer and monitor.

    Without going into huge detail, I am ready to buy a new desktop for my photography hobby.  I am still running
    CS3 (hoping that will work with Windows 7?), Corel Paint Shop Pro X (yeah, I know I have really old software, but I
    don't feel the need to upgrade just yet), Picasa, and all the software that comes with my Canon 40D.  I take all my pics in
    .raw and then edit/convert.  I have a 1 terabyte eternal drive where I store my photos, but editing from that source is S-L-O-W.
    Someone mentioned on another site something about aneSata drive.  Need more info. (I want an easy way to backup my
    photos monthly, because I have a fear of someone breaking in my home, stealing my pc and then all my photos are gone.
    With the external drive, I can put it in my safe deposit box.)
    I want a monitor (preferably not widescreen) that will be accurate with color and not have a glare, maybe 20" or so.  I print photos at home on my HP Photosmart printer, but I also have some printed professionally.  I would like recommendations on monitor calibration gadgets/software
    so that what I see is very close to what will print.
    This computer will have MSOffice 2010 on it. Will have quite a few other softwares on it that are currently on my old pc.
    We don't watch movies on the PC or do any gaming so the video card will mainly be used for photography and some light video use.  We do skype.
    Would like to stay in the range of $1500-2000 if possible.  I've basically purchased Dell's in the past due to the ease of designing my system,
    but I have had two lemons and am certainly not tied to Dell.
    I know I want a wireless mouse/keyboard.  Currently have Dell Speakers 5/1, which are decent enough for my use, as long as I can connect them to my
    new PC.
    Thanks for good advice!!  (And I want this PC to last me about 5 years so I would guess I need at least 8 g ram, 3.5 GHz processor, preferably Intel.
    Also want 4 or more USB ports on the front or side, as my PC location is not suitable to use the back ports easily.)   Thank you!

    picture-me wrote:
    Would like to stay in the range of $1500-2000 if possible.
    I've taken quite a "non-standard" approach to this...  a little while back I purchased a powerful Dell Precision T5400 workstation that's come off lease from eBay, then populated it with good hardware.  Result?  Dual quad core Xeon 3.16 GHz 16 GB system with 3 TB of internal RAID disk storage and a good modern video card for about $1500.  This is a system that would have sold new for probably $6,000 just a few years ago.
    I didn't have to buy any of the external stuff (monitor, backup drives, keyboard/mouse, etc.) because I upgraded from an existing workstation and was able to re-use all that stuff, plus one 1 TB drive from the old system - which I then sold for $700 to recoup some of the cost (total outlay was then only $800).
    I describe the system and how I put it together in some detail here:
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/827500
    This is a far more powerful system than anything I could get new for the same price.
    Just a quick glance at eBay and I see that some T5500 workstations are becoming available for reasonable prices now.  I see, for example, a dual quad system with 12 GB of RAM for a Buy It Now price of a hair over $1000.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for