Reconcile question: Error iterating accounts for resource:

Guys,
One question. While trying to reconsile my MS SQL database table it fails and I'm getting the next error message:
Error iterating accounts for resource :
java.lang.NullPointerException
Any Idea what might cause this error. All other resources are reconsiling just fine...
Thanks.
Elger

Unfortunately that didn't help. I deleted the whole account index just to make sure all 'links' where gone but I'm still getting the null pointer exception.
Any more idea's?

Similar Messages

Question on potential configurations for resource cluster as virtual machine server / beowulf / render farm

I am looking for a starting point on where to focus my efforts in researching a desired configuration. Of course anyone who spends anytime researching in forums knows that one thing that people hate is for people
to ask questions that can be easily answered with a simple Google search, so let me start by saying I have done many hours of research on this already. The problem I am having is that although there is a huge amount of information out there on what I
am looking to do, I don't believe many people have attempted this on as small of a scale as a single user system. Also, the amount of routes to go down seems endless, which for me so far has led to many hours of wasted trial and error. So keep
in mind that I am not so much looking for a handout on answers but rather a more narrowed path of searching and researching.
What I am looking to do is take the current equipment that I have and consolidate it into a 9-12U server rack using mounted 2 or 3U atx cases so that I can have a more organized, space saving setup. That is the
easy part, what I have been looking into though is the combining of cores and processing power to make a "super computer" yet I use this term very loosely. From what I have read, the closest thing I can compare the idea in my head to is referred
to as a Beowulf Cluster, or a Render farm but I believe as the name suggests that this is more dedicated to a single task of rendering. I like the idea of a virtual machine server where I would never actually locally use this machine but rather set up
many virtual machines that I can remote into. I started to compile a ProxMox Server, and this was the right idea, however when running a VM, that VM is constrained to the hardware resources of the single node that it is assigned to. If there is
a way to be able to have a machine that would utilize the 20 some odd cores that I would have in the cluster, along with the 40-50 gigs of ram, well that would be ideal but sounds too good to be possible. Also, ProxMox isnt quite there in compatibility for
a home/home office user. I understand that the programs that are used have to be written in a way where the architecture allows for such, but if it could even be used for speeding up my render time with Adobe and Autodesk (which I know do have such functionality)
that would be wonderful.
So without writing a whole book I am looking for suggestions on how to proceed. Can I literally build a "super computer" that is not really that super... more mediocre super... or am I better off just consolidating the hardware but not the
OS's and programs. Also, I do currently use three or four different distros of Linux, mostly for ethical hacking and security type work like pen testing. One thing I have never been a fan of though is dual booting. Perhaps investing
in a hot-swap HDD chassis that I could load all the different OS's on where I could just pop in whatever OS I am looking to use. As you can see I am far from knowing where to spend my efforts in research.... THANK YOu for ANY help.
I was recently suggested Microsoft HPC Pack as a platform? Anything?
Here is what I currently have:
these are all fully built)
Intel i5 3.7 quad core
Nvidia (ASUS) GTX-760
16 Gb DDR3 @ 1600 Corsair
ASUS Sabertooth Z87 MoBo
Autodesk - Inventor, Revit, 3Ds Max, Maya, Fusion 360, Flow, etc.
Adobe - PhotoShop, After Effects, Dreamweaver, Illustrator, etc.
Basically as you can see this is used for my work in 3d modeling, rendering, and drafting along with 3D printing.
Sys. #2
AMD 4.7-5.0 8 Core
Nvidia GTX 760 (Same as sys #1)
16 Gb DDR3 @ 2400 Mhz
ASUS Crosshair V Formula Z
Various programs for programming, app development, gaming, etc. (This is my daily driver)
Sys #3
AMD 4.5-4.7 8 core
16 Gb DDR3 @ 1600 Mhz
Asus Crosshair V Formula Z MoBo
Not currently using this one but is fully functional.
Sys #4
HP built i5 3.4 quad core
12 Gb DDR3 @ 1600
Nothing Special - this is the one I was using for school work but being that school and programming became one and the same I have all but abandoned it.
THANK YOU AGAIN TO ANYONE WHO HAS MADE IT THIS FAR in reading this.

The cluster works only for standalone webcache and httpserver installations types.
If you want to do this you have to use dcmctl command to change from one farm to another.
try checking with dcmctl command with out options an dyou will get a full list of options.
then run dcmctl usage(orhelp) option to see what you need.
As far as I remember
you have to check the farm id of the server you want to be the master
then in the second, you have to run dcmctl joinfarm or something like that.
Regards.

Error creating acl for (resource). I get this error when entering security info in web.xml.

We're using iWS 6.0. Is there some security configuration that needs to be done in order to use standard security directives in our web application's web.xml?
Thanks!

Hi ,
I have tried adding the following into web.xml but the security feature just doesnt work and the user can go to any page without any restriction.
<security-constraint>
<web-resource-collection>
<web-resource-name>Declarative Security Test</web-resource-name>
<url-pattern>/SuperServlet</url-pattern>
<url-pattern>/*</url-pattern>
<http-method>post</http-method>
<http-method>get</http-method>
</web-resource-collection>
<user-data-constraint>
<transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
</user-data-constraint>
<auth-constraint>
<role-name>guest</role-name>
<role-name>member</role-name>
</auth-constraint>
</security-constraint>
<login-config>
<auth-method>BASIC</auth-method>
</login-config>
<security-role>
<role-name>guest</role-name>
<role-name>member</role-name>
</security-role>
The roles mentioned above have been added correctly into tomcat-users.xml..The version of tomcat I am using is tomcat5.0.28.Please help.

Depreciation error ""expense account account bewlo zero could not be find""

Hi
We are getting the error "Expns Account for ordinary depcreation below Zero could not be find".When Checked some assets are becoming negative with current period's depre run.
Eg:Asset value 500 , 4 yrs back and depre/month is 60.When coming to current period asset balance is only 40 but depreciation is 60 so it is giving above error.
How to resolve this?
1.can I give Expense depre GL in field "expense account bewlow zero"AO90 ?If gives what happens??does 60 post debit side and 20 posts credit side?
2.Is above method is correct?
3.Since this month balance is zero am I right in assuming that Zero asset won't be picked up for depreciation next month?
Please explain if I can do the above method?
hinfi

Hi,
assign an account for "Expense account for spec.dep.below zero" in a090.

Display authorization for resource planning missing

Hi,
while open the Resource planner with log in service manager.it is showing following error
Display authorization for resource planning missing
i am not getting this error why it is showing.any one help me to solve this issue
Thanks & Regards
Kishore Kumar

Maintain the authorization Objects for the PFCG role assigned to the user
Authorization Object
Description
Authorization Field
Value
Value: System
Relevance
WFDS_RPA
Authorization Object Transaction
ACTVT
3
WFD server
Service resource planning application (RPA)
WFDS_RPA
Authorization Object Transaction
ACTVT
2
WFD server
RPA
B_BUPA_GRP
Business Partner: Authorization Groups
ACTVT
3
SAP CRM
RPA
Appointment scheduling
B_BUPA_RLT
Business Partner: BP Roles
ACTVT
3
SAP CRM
RPA
Appointment scheduling
B_BUPA_RLT
Business Partner: BP Roles
ACTVT
3
SAP CRM
RPA
Appointment scheduling
WFDS_JFUNC
Authorization Object Resource (Type of WFD Resource)
WFDS_RTYPE
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
WFDS_JFUNC
Authorization Object Resource (Job Function)
WFDS_JFUNC
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
WFDS_JFUNC
Authorization Object Resource (Job Level)
WFDS_JLEVE
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
WFDS_SAREA
Authorization Object Resource (Type of WFD Resource)
WFDS_RTYPE
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
WFDS_SAREA
Authorization Object Resource (Service Area)
WFDS_SAREA
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
S_TCODE
Transaction Code
TCD
/SAPAPO/LRP_ACCESS
WFD server
RPA
Appointment scheduling
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_NAME
WCC_SRV_RPA
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_WIN
WCC_SRV_RPA/MainWindow
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_PLUG
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_NAME
WFDRPA
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_WIN
MainWindow
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_PLUG
DEFAULT
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_NAME
WFDRPA
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_PLUG
DEFAULT
SAP CRM
RPA
UIU_COMP
Authorization UI
COMP_WIN
WFDRPA/MainWindow
SAP CRM
RPA

Account for restricted revenue missing

Hi,
I am facing a problem in Revenue Recognition for service Related one. I am getting an error while generating a Billing Accounting document, the error is "Account for 'restricted revenue' missing in item 000010 of document xxxxx" and the Message no. VFRR012. Can any one help me in resolving this issue.
thanks in advance.
Regards,
Satya

Hello Satya,
Please apply the attached note 784827 correcting a program error which
could cause this problem.
The note 777996 resuming the necessary account setting for
Revenue Recognition. Please check it.
The Revenue Recognition accounts are got from the condition table
KONV of the sales document (VBAK-KNUMV is key field of KONV).
So maybe a New price determination of the sales document (once the
invoice is deleted) can correct it.
The invoice can't be transferred to FI because an accrual account
of a revenue recognition relevant condition is missing. During
the transferring process the control lines VBREVK will be checked
which is not possible in this example. The account is also missing
in the sales document.
To fix this issue it's necessary to refill the accrual account in the
sales document, cancel the incomplete invoice and recreate the
invoice. Then all needed accounts will be assigned to the invoice
conditions.
Regards,
Alex

MySQL reconcile | The adapter must support iterating accounts

I have set up a mysql adapter in the default way (that is minimum changes to what was already existing in the resource wizard). I have also set my reconciliation policy with the default out of the box settings....
But when I do a full or an incremental reconcile I get this error:
The adapter must support iterating accounts in order to reconcile accounts on resource 'MySQL'.
Can somebody point me what is the 'obvious' wrong that I am doing?
Thanks a TON in advance

Hi,
I also have the same error message (using a MySQL adapter).
8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
The adapter must support iterating accounts in order to reconcile accounts on resource 'MySQL'.
8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---
Do you have some hints/idea since the last time ?
Thanks a lot in advance

The adapter must support iterating accounts in order to reconcile accounts

I started a reconciliation-to load users into IDM and the status shows
"The adapter must support iterating accounts in order to reconcile accounts on resource FFSYNC "
Can we use FlatFileActiveSync resource for reconciliation? and If yes, is there anything I should be looking at the adapter configuration?
Can anybody point me to the right direction?
G

I don't think so, this feature is missing in Flat File resource and required for reconciling.
You will be more lucky with XML File resource (you must add it manually to resource types: class com.waveset.adapter.XMLResourceAdapter). It requires specific structure of file, so maybe can be more easier fill in some DB table...
Cheers,
Frantisek

Service accounts for the Workspace Database service permission Error while creating Tabular Mode from PowerPivot

Hi All,
Please help me out against this issue. I have spent so much (3 working days) time just figuring out what is the issue and its solution.
I am learning Tabular Mode and trying to create a mode based on PowerPivot model. I am getting following error message:
'The PowerPivot workbook could not be imported. The service account for the workspace database server does not have permission to read from the PowerPivot workbook.'
Here is my infrastructure:
1. SSAS in Tabular Mode is installed on my Windows 8 Laptop
2. PowerPivot is also in my laptop
3. There is only my account (as Admin of course) for SSAS
Here are my questions:
1. What is this error and how can I cope with that? A step by step explanation would be highly appreciated :-)
2. Do I need to change something in Windows settings or in SSAS?
3. I am confused about my workspace database server as well, Do I have to install SSAS twice; one for development and one for workspace?
Looking forward for the expert advise.
Tahir
Thanks, TA

Hi,
I suspect you might have more luck if you try the SSAS forum: http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home?forum=sqlanalysisservices
Regards
Jamie
ObjectStorageHelper<T> – A WinRT utility for Windows 8 |
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/jamie_thomson/ |
@jamiet |
About me

Getting deadlock detected while waiting for resource error for select Query.....

Hi all,
i am getting a below error whenever executing the below select query....
some times it will show dead lock detected while waiting for resource and terminated...
some times it executes and gives result..
but all the time it writes an alert to alert log
Plesae suggest how to resolve the issue..........
Thanks in advance
Env: Linux / Oracle 11.2.0.3.3
Error from alert log:
Errors in file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
Trace file info... bdrdb_p017_6076.trc:
Trace file /u01/oracle/oracle/diag/rdbms/bdrdb/bdrdb/trace/bdrdb_p017_6076.trc
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
ORACLE_HOME = /u01/oracle/oracle/product/11.2.0/dbhome_1
System name:    Linux
Node name:      bdrdb.cteplindia.com
Release:        2.6.18-308.el5PAE
Version:        #1 SMP Fri Jan 27 17:40:09 EST 2012
Machine:        i686
Instance name: bdrdb
Redo thread mounted by this instance: 1
Oracle process number: 92
Unix process pid: 6076, image: [email protected] (P017)
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SESSION ID:(423.59970) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** SERVICE NAME:(bdrdb) 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** MODULE NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.915
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
PS-00000001-00000011        92     423     S             33     128     S     X
BF-2ed08c01-00000000        33     128     S             92     423     S     X
session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126     session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23
session 128: DID 0001-0021-00067D23     session 423: DID 0001-005C-00081126
Rows waited on:
Session 423: no row
Session 128: obj - rowid = 00021DC1 - AAAh3BAAVAAAQL/AAA
(dictionary objn - 138689, file - 21, block - 66303, slot - 0)
----- Information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
Session 128:
sid: 128 ser: 46176 audsid: 1836857 user: 102/DBLOCAL
    flags: (0x8000041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/-
    flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC
pid: 33 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 31611
    image: [email protected]
client details:
    O/S info: user: masked, term: masked, ospid: 5924:568
    machine: masked program: Toad.exe
    application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
    application name: TOAD background query session, hash value=526966934
current SQL:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
       B_USER_INFO,
       J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
       L_TEST_STATUS,
       L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
       j_op_test_anml
WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
       AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_00"
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (:"SYS_B_01", :"SYS_B_02", :"SYS_B_03")
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = :"SYS_B_04"
       AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = :"SYS_B_05"
       AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN (:"SYS_B_06", :"SYS_B_07", :"SYS_B_08")
       AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
----- End of information for the OTHER waiting sessions -----
*** 2013-11-04 23:18:57.916
dbkedDefDump(): Starting a non-incident diagnostic dump (flags=0x0, level=3, mask=0x0)
----- Error Stack Dump -----
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
ORA-10387: parallel query server interrupt (normal)
----- SQL Statement (None) -----
Current SQL information unavailable - no cursor.
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling              call     entry                argument values in hex
location             type     point                (? means dubious value)
More......
Query:
SELECT DISTINCT B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
FROM B_FP_TEST,
       B_USER_INFO,
       J_FP_INVESTIGATOR,
       L_TEST_STATUS,
       L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE,
       j_op_test_anml
WHERE     B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.TEST_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_TYPE_ID = L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID
       AND B_USER_INFO.B_USER_INFO_ID = J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.INVESTIGATOR_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.STATUS_ID = L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS_ID
       AND B_FP_TEST.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND B_FP_TEST.TEST_NUM NOT IN (1, 2, 99)
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND J_FP_INVESTIGATOR.is_pi = 1
       AND L_TEST_STATUS.STATUS IN ('Scheduled', 'In-Progress', 'Completed')
       AND j_op_test_anml.test_id = B_FP_TEST.TEST_ID
       AND (   (j_op_test_anml.end_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                            AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
            OR (j_op_test_anml.start_date BETWEEN TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') - 1
                                              AND TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') + 1)
            OR (TO_DATE ('28-Oct-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                            AND j_op_test_anml.end_date)
            OR (TO_DATE ('04-Nov-2013') BETWEEN j_op_test_anml.start_date
                                            AND j_op_test_anml.end_date))
       AND L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE.IS_DELETED = 0
       AND B_FP_TEST.DATASOURCE_ID = 9
Query Exp plan:
Plan hash value: 3398228788
| Id | Operation                                          | Name                | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |    TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                                   |                     | 1501 |   102K| 1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
|   1 | HASH UNIQUE                                       |                     | 1501 |   102K| 1929   (1)| 00:00:24 |       |       |        |      |            |
|   2 |   CONCATENATION                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   3 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
|   4 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ30005            |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
|* 5 |      HASH JOIN                                     |                     |   241 | 16870 |   800   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
|   6 |       PX RECEIVE                                   |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
|   7 |        PX SEND HASH                                | :TQ30004            |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 8 |         HASH JOIN                                  |                     |   246 | 15990 |   797   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
|   9 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
| 10 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ30003            |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,03 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 11 |            HASH JOIN                               |                     |   573 | 29223 |   793   (1)| 00:00:10 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 12 |             BUFFER SORT                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
| 13 |              PX RECEIVE                            |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 14 |               PX SEND BROADCAST                    | :TQ30000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 15 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 16 |                 NESTED LOOPS                       |                     |   485 | 20855 |   781   (0)| 00:00:10 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 17 |                  TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| J_OP_TEST_ANML      |   485 | 10185 |   296   (0)| 00:00:04 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
|* 18 |                   INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | IDX$$_2D190001      |   485 |       |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 19 |                  INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                 | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 20 |                 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 21 |             PX BLOCK ITERATOR                      |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWC |            |
|* 22 |              TABLE ACCESS FULL                     | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,03 | PCWP |            |
| 23 |          BUFFER SORT                               |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWC |            |
| 24 |           PX RECEIVE                               |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,04 | PCWP |            |
| 25 |            PX SEND HASH                            | :TQ30001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 26 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 27 |       BUFFER SORT                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWC |            |
| 28 |        PX RECEIVE                                  |                     |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q3,05 | PCWP |            |
| 29 |         PX SEND HASH                               | :TQ30002            |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 30 |          TABLE ACCESS FULL                         | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |    30 |   150 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 31 |    NESTED LOOPS                                    |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 32 |     NESTED LOOPS                                   |                     |     3 |   210 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 33 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |     3 |   195 |   329   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 34 |       HASH JOIN                                    |                     |     2 |   114 |   325   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 35 |        NESTED LOOPS                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 36 |         NESTED LOOPS                               |                     |     6 |   258 |   322   (1)| 00:00:04 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 37 |          PARTITION RANGE SINGLE                    |                     |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 38 |           TABLE ACCESS FULL                        | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |     6 |   126 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 39 |          INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                         | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 40 |         TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID         | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
|* 41 |        TABLE ACCESS FULL                           | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 42 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   |     1 |     8 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 43 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN                            | FI_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 44 |      INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                             | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 45 |     TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                    | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 46 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 47 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ20003            |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 48 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 49 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 | 2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 50 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    33 | 2145 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 51 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 52 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ20002            |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,02 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 53 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 54 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
| 55 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 56 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ20000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 57 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 58 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 | 2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 59 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 60 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 61 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 62 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 63 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWC |            |
|* 64 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,02 | PCWP |            |
| 65 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWC |            |
| 66 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 67 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ20001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 68 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 69 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 70 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q2,03 | PCWP |            |
| 71 |    PX COORDINATOR                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 72 |     PX SEND QC (RANDOM)                            | :TQ10003            |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | P->S | QC (RAND) |
| 73 |      NESTED LOOPS                                  |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 74 |       NESTED LOOPS                                 |                     |    33 | 2310 |   399   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 75 |        HASH JOIN                                   |                     |    34 | 2210 |   397   (2)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 76 |         PX RECEIVE                                 |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 77 |          PX SEND HASH                              | :TQ10002            |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,02 | P->P | HASH       |
|* 78 |           HASH JOIN                                |                     |    78 | 3978 |   393   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 79 |            BUFFER SORT                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
| 80 |             PX RECEIVE                             |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 81 |              PX SEND BROADCAST                     | :TQ10000            |       |       |            |          |       |       |        | S->P | BROADCAST |
| 82 |               NESTED LOOPS                         |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       |        |      |            |
| 83 |                NESTED LOOPS                        |                     |    66 | 2838 |   382   (1)| 00:00:05 |       |       |        |      |            |
| 84 |                 PARTITION RANGE SINGLE             |                     |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 85 |                  TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | J_OP_TEST_ANML      |    66 | 1386 |   316   (1)| 00:00:04 |     7 |     7 |        |      |            |
|* 86 |                 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                  | FT_TEST_ID_PK       |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 87 |                TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID | B_FP_TEST           |     1 |    22 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |        |      |            |
| 88 |            PX BLOCK ITERATOR                       |                     | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWC |            |
|* 89 |             TABLE ACCESS FULL                      | J_FP_INVESTIGATOR   | 70382 |   549K|    11   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,02 | PCWP |            |
| 90 |         BUFFER SORT                                |                     |       |       |            |          |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWC |            |
| 91 |          PX RECEIVE                                |                     |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
| 92 |           PX SEND HASH                             | :TQ10001            |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        | S->P | HASH       |
|* 93 |            TABLE ACCESS FULL                       | L_TEST_STATUS       |     3 |    42 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |        |      |            |
|* 94 |        INDEX UNIQUE SCAN                           | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE_PK |     1 |       |     0   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
|* 95 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID                  | L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE    |     1 |     5 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       | Q1,03 | PCWP |            |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   5 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
   8 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
11 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
18 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))
19 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
20 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
22 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
26 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
30 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
34 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
38 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
39 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
40 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
41 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
42 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
43 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
44 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
45 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
50 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
53 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
60 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
61 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
62 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
64 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
68 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
69 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
70 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)
75 - access("B_FP_TEST"."STATUS_ID"="L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS_ID")
78 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID"="J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."TEST_ID")
85 - filter("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND "J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-28
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss') AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR
              LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-04 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."END_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))) AND
              (LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE">=TO_DATE(' 2013-10-27 00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss')) OR LNNVL("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."START_DATE"<=TO_DATE(' 2013-11-05
              00:00:00', 'syyyy-mm-dd hh24:mi:ss'))))
86 - access("J_OP_TEST_ANML"."TEST_ID"="B_FP_TEST"."TEST_ID")
87 - filter("B_FP_TEST"."DATASOURCE_ID"=9 AND "B_FP_TEST"."IS_DELETED"=0 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>1 AND "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>2 AND
              "B_FP_TEST"."TEST_NUM"<>99)
89 - filter("J_FP_INVESTIGATOR"."IS_PI"=1)
93 - filter("L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Completed' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='In-Progress' OR "L_TEST_STATUS"."STATUS"='Scheduled')
94 - access("B_FP_TEST"."TEST_TYPE_ID"="L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."ATMS_TEST_TYPE_ID")
95 - filter("L_ATMS_TEST_TYPE"."IS_DELETED"=0)

Excellent piece of follow-up on my first suggestion.
I nearly made a comment about how the plan doesn't show Bloom filter pruning either - and then I realised why not. The plan you've shown us comes from Explain Plan with literal values present; the trace file shows bind variables with names that are generated when cursor_sharing is set to force or similar - so the run-time plan and the plan from explain plan are almost guaranteed to be different.
Oracle support will need you to supply the plan you get from trying to run the query and then making a call to dbms_xplan.display_cursor() - dbms_xplan in 10g | Oracle Scratchpad If you do this I think you'll find that the pstart/pstop columns contain entries like :BF0000, and you may even find operations link PX JOIN FILTER CREATE / PX JOIN FILTER USE
A couple of generic notes:
if a query does sufficient work to merit parallel execution, then it's usually better to supply the best possible information to the optimizer, which means using literals rather than bind variables - you could try executing the query with the hint /*+ cursor_sharing_exact */ to stop Oracle from turning your literals into binds; it might be the presence of bind variables that's making the optimizer choose a path that has to include bloom filter pruning in your case.
Where you have the to_date() call you've used a four-digit year - which is a very good thing and helps the optimizer - but it's also a good idea to include an explicit format string as well: with a four-digit year this probably won't make any difference, but it avoids any risk of ambiguity for the optimizer.
I made a comment about the P->S stage and bottlenecks - I spent a couple more minutes looking at the plan, and I see the optimizer has used concatentation: in effect it has run three query blocks one after the other and fed the results to the query co-ordinator - in this case the P->S would make no difference to the end-user response time there's always a final P->S to the coordinator, you just happen to have three of them.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis

TS3899 "cannot get mail" in iphone5 suddenly. been using iphone to check 2 email accounts for months now, one is gmail and not troubled. the other is thunderbird and i get this error message now. no settings have been changed or anything! ideas?

hey all, I have been getting the "cannot get mail" error message on my iphone5 suddenly.
ive been using iphone to check two email accounts for months now, one is gmail and not troubled. the other is mail from thunderbird and i get this error message now saying it is not responding. no settings have been changed or anything, it just suddenly stopped receiving mail on my device as of Tuesday afternoon.
Does anyone have iny ideas about why? i have yet to update to the new OS7 yet, could that be it?

'The installer has insufficient privileges to modify this file C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Apple\Apple Application Support\Web kit.resources\inspector\Images\Spinner Inactive Selected.gif.'
That one's consistent with disk/file damage. The first thing I'd try with that is running a disk check (chkdsk) over your C drive.
XP instructions in the following document: How to perform disk error checking in Windows XP
Vista instructions in the following document: Check your hard disk for errors
Windows 7 instructions in the following document: How to use CHKDSK (Check Disk)
Select both Automatically fix file system errors and Scan for and attempt recovery of bad sectors, or use chkdsk /r (depending on which way you decide to go about doing this). You'll almost certainly have to schedule the chkdsk to run on startup. The scan should take quite a while ... if it quits after a few minutes or seconds, something's interfering with the scan.
Does the chkdsk find/repair any damage? If so, can you get an install to go through properly afterwards?

Initial Load and Reconcile of IdM accounts vs Resources. Any advices?

Hellos.
Time is now to begin the initial startup of Idm where target resources already have entries.
Is there anywhere an idiots guide explaining to a novice IdM user the steps involved in loading and linking IdM accounts for the first time? I have to stress the guide has to be designed to meet novices needs i.e. those doing it for the first time.
We are fairly confident in running IdM from day 1. What I am unsure about is the best techniques to employ on day 0 so that the first FF Async run on day 1 will update IdM accounts rather than attempt to reinsert them.
We have 3 target resources: 1 AD 2 LDAP and 1 input FF Async source (plus a form for manual adds/mods)
The targets hold a mix of contract staff and employees. The FF source holds just employees, the contactor's data is entered by hand.
Am I being stupid if I do the following:
1. Load IdM Accounts from latest FF source (employees)
2. reconcile matching AD accounts by name.
3. reconcile matching LDAP1 accounts by name.
4. reconcile matching LDAP2 accounts by name.
5. from unmatched AD accounts since an AD account must exist for current staff make 2nd load file for contractors and load these accounts into IdM.
6. reconcile matching AD accounts by name
7. reconcile matching LDAP1 accounts by name
8. reconcile matching LDAP2 accounts by name
9 examine the leftovers and manually correct the mispelt or erroneous ones treating the rest as ghosts.
I am unsure just what the reconciliation is doing, I hope it builds the links between IdM and the resource.
What I am trying to achieve is a situation where I end up at the end of day0 where I have all the Idm accounts in my repository and are correctly linked to resource accounts so that the FF async can manage the bulk of them
I believe this has to be done for every IdM implementation. What I am after is advice and pointers to guidance from those who have had the experience of going though the implementation cycle at least once.

I had a similar problem although I was doing a load from file and I was linking the account to the resource.
I noticed you had:
<Field name='accounts[ISA].created'>
<Default>
<s>true</s>
</Default>
</Field>
Try using the following instead:
<Field name='waveset.accounts[GrandSlamXML].created'>
<Expansion>
<Boolean>true</Boolean>
</Expansion>
</Field>
That is what worked for me.

What accounts for *intermittent* Error -8 failures?

I've been following this group carefully, and configured my router and MacBookPro so that video iChat works successfully on my home wireless network.
SOMETIMES.
This is too weird, and I'm on the verge of giving up. First, I get it working fine. Then another day, the other party can start a video chat with me, but I can't initiate a chat with them. The next day it works OK again. Then the following day it stops working altogether (the infamous Error -8, suggesting port issues). Huh?
The same laptop runs video iChat flawlessly on my office (university) network. So clearly this has something to do with my home network (Austin TX TimeWarner Roadrunner, Buffalo wireless "g" router). I get that.
But all the ports and speeds and Quicktime settings are correct (thank you Ralph). Like I said: I have gotten it to work with this particular port/speed set up. And needless to say, I don't change anything in between.
At this point I'm not even all that interested in wasting more time trying to fix this. My question is a more general one: What on earth can account for this behavior? It would seem to me that once I've got it set up properly, and it works, it ought to continue working. Are my ports magically closing and opening themselves while I sleep? What????
Thanks, Mark

Ahhh,
Road Runner.
They and Comcast seem to exercise some form of Data packet management that iChat does not like.
Both claim they don't do anything.
Try setting iChat > Preferences > Video section > Bandwidth Limit Drop down to 500
(Change ISPs ?)
10:18 PM Wednesday; October 17, 2007

Error: cannot find bundle file or key for resource type

Hello,
Please help in finding out the cause & resolving the below errors.
Logs from the default trace:
Error Log Message: cannot find bundle file or key for resource type http://sap.com/xmlns/ciphotocomp, use fallback
Error Location: com.sapportals.wcm.service.resourceTypeRegistry.ResourceType.getDescription( Locale )
Thanks & Regards
Maha,

<< Do not post the same question across a number of forums >>

TS1368 I'm a PC user with an itunes account for several years. I updated my itunes and now it wont open and shows me 'missing file MSVCR80.dll,and error 7(Window error 126)' keep coming up even after re-installing itunes . What should i do?

I'm a PC user with an itunes account for several years. I updated my itunes and now it wont open and shows me 'missing file MSVCR80.dll,and error 7(Window error 126)' keep coming up even after re-installing itunes . What should i do?

Click here and follow the instructions.
(98897)

Reconcile question: Error iterating accounts for resource:

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for