Recovery of partition table
Hi All,
My question to the forum is :
Oracle version :10.2.0.4
I would like to revcover data from one of the partition of the partition table .
we have monthly partition table , we store about 40 months of data ( hugh table about 800GB) and we have one tablespace for each partition.
I would like to recover data from one of the oldest partition which got purged out .
Steps I did:
1) restored the datafiels of the tablespaces from hot backup for the oldest partition ( xyz_200601) , system and rbs
2) recovered database until cancel
3) database is open mode .. I am not able to access the partition data (xyz_200601), gives me error saying file is missing "ORA-01110: data file 1517: '/u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/dbs/MISSING01517"
Is it possible recover one partition from the table ? or do I need to recover entire table ...
Hi,
Strange, from error
ORA-01110: data file 1517 but not the correct path, why it referring to "dbs" folder
'/u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/dbs/MISSING01517' - is the file correct one. Check.
Any how are you testing your backups validity whether you can recover or not.
What is the error it throwing when you are trying to accessing the partition, check alert log.
- Pavan Kumar N
Oracle 9i/10g - OCP
http://oracleinternals.blogspot.com/
Similar Messages
-
(Yes, I've googled a bunch and read threads like this one already.)
Can I use gpt or some other app to recreate/unerase a partition table? That is, how can I rebuild a disk's GPT/GUID partition table?) I don't want to do FILE recovery.
What happened: Instead of erasing a single partition off a disk with many partitions, the entire partition table was erased (using Disk Utility, w/o deleting the underlying files). Somehow the "Erasing a disk deletes all data on all its partitions." warning message was missed.
I have a copy of the output of df, with the number of blocks in each partition, from just prior to the erasure, so I should be able to recreate the GPT/GUID partition table. Editing the GPT with a hex editor is not feasible. Simply recreating the partitions with Disk Utility will overwrite the key filesystem tables on each partition, and I don't want to do that, plus Disk Utility doesn't allow me to specify exact partition sizes anyway.
Surely there's an app for rebuilding the partition table (other than emacs' hexl-mode!) for recreating/unerasing a partition table when the partition sizes and orders are known? I've looked at the advertising for a bunch of recovery software and none of them clearly indicate that they will do what I want.
I guess I can try using gpt on a copy of the reformatted drive I've made with dd, and see what happens. But perhaps someone knows of a tool that should do what I need, or knows if gpt is that tool or not.
There are answers and tools that will do FILE recovery - search for files and recover the ones that aren't fragmented or deleted. As far as I can find, they just look for files on the disk, and don't pay much, if any attention to the filesystem info or directory heirarchy, which in this case is valuable. Of course I could send it in to DriveSavers, or the like. But none of that seems necessary, and the scavenging file recovery apps won't do the job well,
E.g. some are mentioned here:
I don't want to do FILE recovery.
Thanks for any help.
The links in this post are to pages describing the underlined term, e.g. the man pages for df and gpt.
dd output includes:
Filesystem
512-blocks
Used Available Capacity Mounted onAperture has the ability to work with files in their existing location. They are called "referenced masters." When you import images, you should select the "In their current location" in the "Store Files:" drop down box. Have a read of the documentation for full specifics. Unsure how you can resolve your duplication; might be some work but next time have a read of the manual first
Information for versions is stored in the Aperture database (library file). The masters can be inside the library file itself, or they can be somewhere else. -
Is my partition table corrupt? Why does Boot Camp hate me?
Hi folks
I have an iMac (27-inch, Mid 2010) (iMac11,3, with Boot ROM IM112.0057.B01).
I replaced the internal SuperDrive with an SSD, which is now my primary boot device:
iMac:/ michthom$ diskutil list
/dev/disk0
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *250.1 GB disk0
1: EFI EFI 209.7 MB disk0s1
2: Apple_HFS SSD 248.1 GB disk0s2
3: Apple_Boot Recovery HD 650.0 MB disk0s3
iMac:/ michthom$ sudo gpt -r -vv show disk0
Password:
gpt show: disk0: mediasize=250059350016; sectorsize=512; blocks=488397168
gpt show: disk0: PMBR at sector 0
gpt show: disk0: Pri GPT at sector 1
gpt show: disk0: Sec GPT at sector 488397167
start size index contents
0 1 PMBR
1 1 Pri GPT header
2 32 Pri GPT table
34 6
40 409600 1 GPT part - C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B
409640 484620800 2 GPT part - 48465300-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC
485030440 1269536 3 GPT part - 426F6F74-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC
486299976 2097159
488397135 32 Sec GPT table
488397167 1 Sec GPT header
So far so good.
I want to use the original internal HDD both to run Windows in Boot Camp mode, and to have a partition for my bulk data that doesn't need to be on the SSD.
I reformatted the HDD as a single HFS+ partition, GUID partition table.
I used BCA to create a Windows USB boot device from the Windows 8.1 media after following the hacking in this link.
When the iMac restarted after creating the 250Gb Windows partition on the internal HDD, I got the "no boot device" screen.
I restarted holding Option/Alt and booted from EFI Boot on the USB stick. Windows installer started, at least. Serial number accepted, on to picking a location.
The installation balked when I tried to select the BOOTCAMP partition, with the warning that the disk was formatted as MBR - eh? Why?
So, the current state of the internal HDD must be wrong somehow, but I don't see how to fix it (confidently) and would like someone to point me in the right direction (please!)
iMac:/ michthom$ diskutil list
/dev/disk1
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *1.0 TB disk1
1: EFI EFI 209.7 MB disk1s1
2: Apple_HFS Internal 751.9 GB disk1s2
3: Microsoft Basic Data BOOTCAMP 248.0 GB disk1s3
iMac:/ michthom$ sudo gpt -r -vv show disk1
gpt show: disk1: mediasize=1000204886016; sectorsize=512; blocks=1953525168
gpt show: disk1: Suspicious MBR at sector 0
gpt show: disk1: Pri GPT at sector 1
gpt show: disk1: Sec GPT at sector 1953525167
start size index contents
0 1 MBR
1 1 Pri GPT header
2 32 Pri GPT table
34 6
40 409600 1 GPT part - C12A7328-F81F-11D2-BA4B-00A0C93EC93B
409640 1468478336 2 GPT part - 48465300-0000-11AA-AA11-00306543ECAC
1468887976 263256
1469151232 484372480 3 GPT part - EBD0A0A2-B9E5-4433-87C0-68B6B72699C7
1953523712 1423
1953525135 32 Sec GPT table
1953525167 1 Sec GPT header
gdisk has this to say:
iMac:/ michthom$ sudo gdisk /dev/disk1
Password:
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10
Warning: Devices opened with shared lock will not have their
partition table automatically reloaded!
Partition table scan:
MBR: hybrid
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with hybrid MBR; using GPT.
Command (? for help): x
Expert command (? for help): o
Disk size is 1953525168 sectors (931.5 GiB)
MBR disk identifier: 0x4F5BB38B
MBR partitions:
Number Boot Start Sector End Sector Status Code
1 1 409639 primary 0xEE
2 409640 1468887975 primary 0xAF
3 1469151232 1953523711 primary 0x0B
Expert command (? for help): p
Disk /dev/disk1: 1953525168 sectors, 931.5 GiB
Logical sector size: 512 bytes
Disk identifier (GUID): 3E1D7EF9-F86E-4552-8F40-BE9754C3C73F
Partition table holds up to 128 entries
First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 1953525134
Partitions will be aligned on 8-sector boundaries
Total free space is 264685 sectors (129.2 MiB)
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
1 40 409639 200.0 MiB EF00 EFI System Partition
2 409640 1468887975 700.2 GiB AF00 Internal
3 1469151232 1953523711 231.0 GiB 0700 BOOTCAMP
Any help / pointers gratefully accepted!
MikeThanks to Loner T and some more reading, I think I'm now sorted out.
I found that marking the first partition on the USB stick as Active made no difference - my only option was to boot from the "EFI boot" option at startup (when holding down the alt/option key).
So to get the Windows installer to behave, I used gdisk to write a new protective MBR before rebooting to the USB stick, as shown below.
With the protective MBR in place (rather than hybrid), the Windows installer was happy to reformat the chosen partition and the installation began.
I'll try to report back once all is installed and working, but once again I owe my sanity to the generosity and patience of strangers!
Mike
bash-3.2# gdisk /dev/disk0
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10
Warning: Devices opened with shared lock will not have their
partition table automatically reloaded!
Partition table scan:
MBR: hybrid
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with hybrid MBR; using GPT.
Command (? for help): x
Expert command (? for help): o
<snipped>
Number Boot Start Sector End Sector Status Code
1 1 409639 primary 0xEE
2 409640 1468887975 primary 0xAF
3 1469151232 1953523711 primary 0x0B
Expert command (? for help): p
<snipped>
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
1 40 409639 200.0 MiB EF00 EFI System Partition
2 409640 1468887975 700.2 GiB AF00 Internal
3 1469151232 1953523711 231.0 GiB 0700 BOOTCAMP
Expert command (? for help): v
No problems found. 264685 free sectors (129.2 MiB) available in 3
segments, the largest of which is 263256 (128.5 MiB) in size.
Expert command (? for help): x
<snipped>
n create a new protective MBR
<snipped>
Expert command (? for help): n
Expert command (? for help): w
Final checks complete. About to write GPT data. THIS WILL OVERWRITE EXISTING
PARTITIONS!!
Do you want to proceed? (Y/N): y
OK; writing new GUID partition table (GPT) to /dev/disk0.
Warning: Devices opened with shared lock will not have their
partition table automatically reloaded!
Warning: The kernel may continue to use old or deleted partitions.
You should reboot or remove the drive.
The operation has completed successfully.
bash-3.2# gdisk /dev/disk0
GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.10
Warning: Devices opened with shared lock will not have their
partition table automatically reloaded!
Partition table scan:
MBR: protective
BSD: not present
APM: not present
GPT: present
Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
Command (? for help): x
Expert command (? for help): o
Disk size is 1953525168 sectors (931.5 GiB)
MBR disk identifier: 0x00000000
MBR partitions:
Number Boot Start Sector End Sector Status Code
1 1 1953525167 primary 0xEE
Expert command (? for help): p
<snipped>
Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
1 40 409639 200.0 MiB EF00 EFI System Partition
2 409640 1468887975 700.2 GiB AF00 Internal
3 1469151232 1953523711 231.0 GiB 0700 BOOTCAMP -
Partition Table Looks Different Between OSX and Windows 7
Hey all,
I recently replaced the hard drive on my 2007 iMac, going from the 320GB drive to a 1 TB drive. It actually worked! The previous drive was failing in very odd ways, though booting into the Windows side (more on dual boot later) always seemed to work, and S.M.A.R.T. always reported that the physical drive seemed OK.
The previous drive (320 GB) had around 200GB devoted to OSX and 100GB partitioned off for a working Windows 7 installation (custom installed x64 Win7 Ultimate). I had the Windows system image backed up to my NAS, and had a Windows system bootable disc to restore that image.
After replacing the drive (and almost crying that I had actually done it right), I first restored OSX from a Time Machine backup, and let it take the full 1TB of space as Journalled HFS+. Then, I used Disk Utility to shrink OSX down to 500GB, and created a second partition (formatted to NTFS) with the remaining 500GB.
Now, restoring a Windows system image is an odd thing, as it tries to do a lot of partition work as opposed to simply restoring the Windows install to a partition. I tried Macrium Reflect first (made a backup in that, too), and it looked like it was going to let me restore to the second partition. It completed the restore...and the entire hard drive was hosed. Partitions had been moved, renamed, resized, and nothing was bootable. I had to use Recovery from an external USB thumb drive to go back to the single, full-drive install of OSX.
Then I tried again. Made the second NTFS partition and used the basic Windows System Restore disk to restore from the standard system image I had on the NAS. I was not expecting this to work. But it did. Windows started showing up in Startup Manager when "option" was pressed on bootup, and both OSX and Windows booted properly and ran fine. This is where I (finally) get to the supreme oddities:
OSX Disk Utility still reports two 500GB partitions, one for OSX and one for Windows.
In OSX the Windows partition shows as having NO DATA on it. Not sure what would happen if I tried to write a file to it when mounted, but there is no data on it when viewed from OSX (I was always able to see the Windows files when I mounted that partition on the previous drive).
The Windows partition does not show up as a valid bootable system in System Prefs --> Startup Disk (naturally, I suppose, since OSX doesn't think there is anything there).
From the WINDOWS side, Windows still sees the old partition table: 200GB for the "unknown" HFS partition, and then the rest of the space can be devoted to Windows (started as 100GB, but I was ablt to expand it to use the remaining ~750GB!). Windows thinks it can have 750GB of space even though I know its partition is only 500GB in size!
Windows cannot see the OSX HFS partition data using HFSExplorer. It CAN see the HFS partition on the attached backup drive (the drive I use for Time Machine).
GParted (a partition program on a Linux bootabld CD-ROM) shows the same partitions as OSX Disk Utility (2x500GB), and also thinks the Windows NTFS partition is empty (all space reports as "unused").
Did I mention both OSX and Windows work fine???
There are, of course, two other partitions on the drive: the first partition is the 200MB one I always see (EFI/GUID portion?), and then between the HFS and NTFS partitions is the 600MB recovery partition (which also shows at option-pressed boot time). OSX, GParted, and Windows see all four partitions, and in the same order. It is just that Windows sees the wrong sizes, and OSX cannot see any data in the Windows partition.
Surely this is all going to break spectacularly at some point, isn't it? What if I ever did write a file to the Windows side from OSX, or what if OSX starts taking more space than the 200GB Windows thinks is the max for that partition? What if I try to make Windows use more than 500GB because it thinks it has almost 800GB to use? What if I defrag the Windows drive?
I had no idea a partition table could look this goofy and yet still have everything be bootable and workable. Is there something I can do to get everything in sync? Basically, I am assuming I need to get Windows to do some low-level kung fu in Disk Manager in order to properly get everything lined up with the "right" partitions as reported by both GParted and OSX Disk Utility. But how do I do that?
By the way, any ideas that totally nuke the drive and start from scratch are completely fine (if it seems like they are doing something different enough that I'd give it a try). I have good backups of both OSX and Windows and have restored them about a half dozen times already as I dealt with the previous failing hard drive and with trying to get dual-boot working again. Not to mention, this iMac is now my secondary machine to the new Mac Mini I got a couple weeks back when I wasn't sure how much more life I was going to get from this 6+ year old iMac.
Thanks for listening to me ramble about this very odd issue, and a huge THANK YOU in advance to anyone who has ideas to help.
Thanks,
sutekh138Update:
I am pretty sure the issue is a simple GPT/MBR discrepancy.
I installed rEFIt and used it's partitioning tool (gptsync built in) upon bootup. It was able to show the GPT table and the MBR table, but it thinks the second partition of the drive (the Mac OSX bootable partition) is "extended" in the MBR table and says "will not touch this disk."
However, it does look like an MBR sync should be straightforward, as there four partitions in the GPT table and four in the MBR (and MBR allows a max of four, AFAIK). I just need gptsync to relax some rules. I found a link to a supposedly newer version of gptsync compiled for OSX, so I will try that later.
First, I will try Partition Wizard, a free tool I found for the Windows side. It has a "Repair MBR" option that I would have tried last night if I weren't running a new Windows Image Backup in case all of this goes haywire. *smile* The PW tool also has an option to change the MBR over to GPT entirely. That might work, but then I am not sure Windows 7 will boot (from what I read, x64 Win7 running on EFI-enabled hardware should work, but who knows).
Anyway, I will try the following things, in order, until something works, when I get home tonight:
From Windows, run Partition Wizard and try "Repair MBR".
From OSX, download recent gptsync and try to run it.
From Windows, use Partition Wizard to do a full MBR --> GPT conversion.
Nuke the Windows partition in OSX Disk Utility, expand the HFS partition to take up the whole drive, and then add a Windows-bootable partition via Boot Camp-ish command line commands (diskutil). Because if nothing else works, I have to assume I just created the partitions wrong in the first place such that a Windows restore miraculously works, but the partition weirdness is just a timebomb waiting to happen.
Finally, if none of the above work, I'll just get things back to the way they now work and wait for the timebomb to (possibly never) go off. *smile*
I'll update this thread if I get something figured out, in case anyone else stumbles upon it...
Thanks,
sutekh138 -
Does sql server could export a partition from a partition table ?
Dear :
Does sql server could export a partition from a partition table ?
For example, I need to export all old partition,which is '2013' and drop them. It is easy in oracle. but how to do with sql
server 2012 ?where do you want it to be exported to? Another server instance? if yes you can do piecemeal restore if partition is in a separate filegroup and you're on full recovery model
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-IN/library/ms177425.aspx
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs -
Ubuntu wrecked partition table. Help to fix?
(Macbook Pro 2013 15" Crystalwell 4 Core, 500GB SSD 16GB RAM)
I should have known that installing Ubuntu next to Bootcamp was a bad idea.
So here's what's up... Before this whole debacle began I had two separate partitions on my SSD. The primary partition was for Mavericks with 300GB. The second partition was to a Bootcamped Windows 7 with 150 GB of space. I left 50GB free between the two, which still left me at
disk0s1 for EFI, ~200 MB
disk0s2 for Macintosh HD, 300 GB
disk0s3 for Recovery HD 650 MB
disk0s4 for Bootcamp 148 GB
Here's where my problem began. Genius me decided to attempt to install Ubuntu via live USB onto the 50GB space in between. I have reFIT installed so this wasn't a problem. After loading into Ubuntu and realizing that it wouldn't load into the 50GB space, I rebooted and installed alongside Windows (through the Ubuntu live usb) following the install GUI Prompt.
The installation failed after it got hung on a CRON command and drained the battery from my unplugged computer sitting next to me in my bed (I fell asleep waiting for it to finish, even though it was at 100% battery when it started the installation). When I woke up my computer was dead, so I plugged it in. I started reFIT and booted into Windows after seeing that Ubuntu wasn't there. I was given the "Choose OS" prompt from Windows and Ubuntu wouldn't load, so I said screw it and went back to Mavericks. When I opened my Disk utility partitions table to see where it might have gone wrong....
Great Odin's Raven.
I now had ext4 partitions sitting above my bootcamp partition and linux-swap partitions below it. Absolutely no free space. I switched back to Windows, avoiding the failed Ubuntu OS, and uninstalled wubi from Windows (the universal uninstall for ubuntu, I used the Windows "uninstall application" application from Control Center), hopefully deleting the mess it had made of my drive table.
It didn't.
Since I couldn't delete the partitions back to free space around my bootcamp volume using Disk utility (insufficient hfs+ permissions or something like that), I decided to take a more agressive option. I installed partedMagic onto a live USB and once again rebooted my computer into the live USB. I went in and using gParted removed the partitions in front of the bootcamp volume and behind it reducing them to empty space. Good! Hoping for the best I went back to reFIT and booted into Windows...
"No bootable device -- insert boot disk and press any key"
Well crap.
After some more research into why this wasn't working, I was sure that somehow my EFI wasn't loading the right area of my hard drive. Then I think I found out what happened. I ran diskutil list from terminal and saw this..
IceMan-HomeBase:~ Tim$ diskutil list
/dev/disk0
#: TYPE NAME SIZE IDENTIFIER
0: GUID_partition_scheme *500.3 GB disk0
1: EFI EFI 209.7 MB disk0s1
2: Apple_HFS Macintosh HD 300.2 GB disk0s2
3: Apple_HFS Recovery HD 650.0 MB disk0s3
4: Microsoft Basic Data BOOTCAMP 148.0 GB disk0s6
disk0s6. There's the problem. Mac doesn't like anything beyond disk0s4, which is where Bootcamp was originally and where it should be now, at disk0s4.
If it were merely an issue of copying the bootcamp volume and repartitioning the hard drive, that wouldn't be a problem, but even WinClone doesn't like this volume. When I tried to do a copy, it threw an error saying "Invalid partition ID of 6"
Here is my question.
Is there a way to change the IDENTIFIER back to disk0s4 from disk0s6 and save my Windows 7 partition, is there some other way to save my files to a backup and clean install, or is he dead, Jim?
Sorry if this was a little long-winded, but I figured too much information would be better than not enough.
Thank you in advance for anyone brave enough to read this.
TL;DR
Partition table went bogus because of a bad Ubuntu OS install. Windows can't find a bootable device. Disk0s4 is now disk0s6. Possible way to change this?Problem solved, I used iPartition to resize the partition back to its original size after which I could copy all data off.
-
X200 Boot Configuration Corrupt !! How do I partition table repair ........help please
Hopefully someone can help me as I'm about to go mad......
My x200 says that my Boot configuration is corrupt and that to repair it I have do a 'partition table repair' error code 0x490
I have tried to use the recovery cd's but each time they try and restore to factory original settings it says becuase there had been a previous attemp to restore which was stopped early the Boot Configuration isn't complete and I dont have enough room on the partition swload c: to carryon - again its saying to increase the size of the partition swload c: but I don't know how !!!!!!!
I've looked in the BIOS setup but cant see anything in there about partitions......
Can anybody help please :-((
Message Edited by Christian333 on 01-18-2009 06:06 AMChristian333, welcome to the forum,
I personally have never heard of your problem, others may have, but I would start by running Drive Fitness Test from Hitachi to check the hard drive. Even if you don't have an Hitachi drive it will say whether or not the drive is OK. I always run it from CD.
If the drive is OK I would then run Secure Data Disposal at it's lowest level in order to eliminate anything in the boot sectors and then afterwards the recovery discs. If problems are then experienced it's time to call service.
Hope this helps
Andy ______________________________________
Please remember to come back and mark the post that you feel solved your question as the solution, it earns the member + points
Did you find a post helpfull? You can thank the member by clicking on the star to the left awarding them Kudos Please add your type, model number and OS to your signature, it helps to help you. Forum Search Option T430 2347-G7U W8 x64, Yoga 10 HD+, Tablet 1838-2BG, T61p 6460-67G W7 x64, T43p 2668-G2G XP, T23 2647-9LG XP, plus a few more. FYI Unsolicited Personal Messages will be ignored.
Deutsche Community Comunidad en Español English Community Русскоязычное Сообщество
PepperonI blog -
Error while creating partition table
Hi frnds i am getting error while i am trying to create a partition table using range
getting error ORA-00906: missing left parenthesis.I used the following statement to create partition table
CREATE TABLE SAMPLE_ORDERS
(ORDER_NUMBER NUMBER,
ORDER_DATE DATE,
CUST_NUM NUMBER,
TOTAL_PRICE NUMBER,
TOTAL_TAX NUMBER,
TOTAL_SHIPPING NUMBER)
PARTITION BY RANGE(ORDER_DATE)
PARTITION SO99Q1 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-APR-1999’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO99Q2 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-JUL-1999’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO99Q3 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-OCT-1999’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO99Q4 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-JAN-2000’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO00Q1 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-APR-2000’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO00Q2 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-JUL-2000’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO00Q3 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-OCT-2000’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’),
PARTITION SO00Q4 VALUES LESS THAN TO_DATE(‘01-JAN-2001’, ‘DD-MON-YYYY’)
;More than one of them. Try this instead:
CREATE TABLE SAMPLE_ORDERS
(ORDER_NUMBER NUMBER,
ORDER_DATE DATE,
CUST_NUM NUMBER,
TOTAL_PRICE NUMBER,
TOTAL_TAX NUMBER,
TOTAL_SHIPPING NUMBER)
PARTITION BY RANGE(ORDER_DATE) (
PARTITION SO99Q1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-1999', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO99Q2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JUL-1999', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO99Q3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-OCT-1999', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO99Q4 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JAN-2000', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO00Q1 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-APR-2000', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO00Q2 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JUL-2000', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO00Q3 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-OCT-2000', 'DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION SO00Q4 VALUES LESS THAN (TO_DATE('01-JAN-2001', 'DD-MON-YYYY')))In the future, if you are having problems, go to Morgan's Library at www.psoug.org.
Find a working demo, copy it, then modify it for your purposes. -
Local index vs global index in partitioned tables
Hi,
I want to know the differences between a global and a local index.
I'm working with partitioned tables about 10 millons rows and 40 partitions.
I know that when your table is partitioned and your index non-partitioned is possible that
some database operations make your index unusable and you have tu rebuid it, for example
when yo truncate a partition your global index results unusable, is there any other operation
that make the global index unusable??
I think that the advantage of a global index is that takes less space than a local and is easier to rebuild,
and the advantage of a local index is that is more effective resolving a query isn't it???
Any advice and help about local vs global index in partitioned tables will be greatly apreciatted.
Thanks in advancehere is the documentation -> http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/partconc.htm#sthref2570
In general, you should use global indexes for OLTP applications and local indexes for data warehousing or DSS applications. Also, whenever possible, you should try to use local indexes because they are easier to manage. When deciding what kind of partitioned index to use, you should consider the following guidelines in order:
1. If the table partitioning column is a subset of the index keys, use a local index. If this is the case, you are finished. If this is not the case, continue to guideline 2.
2. If the index is unique, use a global index. If this is the case, you are finished. If this is not the case, continue to guideline 3.
3. If your priority is manageability, use a local index. If this is the case, you are finished. If this is not the case, continue to guideline 4.
4. If the application is an OLTP one and users need quick response times, use a global index. If the application is a DSS one and users are more interested in throughput, use a local index.
Kind regards,
Tonguç -
Insert statement does not insert all records from a partitioned table
Hi
I need to insert records in to a table from a partitioned table.I set up a job and to my surprise i found that the insert statement is not inserting all the records on the partitioned table.
for example when i am using select statement on to a partitioned table
it gives me 400 records but when i insert it gives me only 100 records.
can anyone help in this matter.INSERT INTO TABLENAME(COLUMNS)
(SELECT *
FROM SCHEMA1.TABLENAME1
JOIN SCHEMA2.TABLENAME2a
ON CONDITION
JOIN SCHEMA2.TABLENAME2 b
ON CONDITION AND CONDITION
WHERE CONDITION
AND CONDITION
AND CONDITION
AND CONDITION
AND (CONDITION
HAVING SUM(COLUMN) > 0
GROUP BY COLUMNS -
Performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?
Hi all,
Are there any known performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?
Ive been doing some performance testes with a large version enable partitioned table and it seems that OCB optimiser is choosing very expensive plans during merge operations.
Tanks in advance,
Vitor
Example:
Object Name Rows Bytes Cost Object Node In/Out PStart PStop
UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE 1 249
UPDATE SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT
NESTED LOOPS SEMI 1 266 249
PARTITION RANGE ALL 1 9
TABLE ACCESS FULL SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT 1 259 2 1 9
VIEW SYS.VW_NSO_1 1 7 247
NESTED LOOPS 1 739 247
NESTED LOOPS 1 677 247
NESTED LOOPS 1 412 246
NESTED LOOPS 1 114 244
INDEX RANGE SCAN WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK 1 62 2
INDEX RANGE SCAN SIG.QIM_PK 1 52 243
TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT 1 298 2 ROWID ROW L
INDEX RANGE SCAN SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$ 1 1
INDEX RANGE SCAN WMSYS.WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX 1 265 1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK 1 62
/* Formatted on 2004/04/19 18:57 (Formatter Plus v4.8.0) */
UPDATE /*+ USE_NL(Z1) ROWID(Z1) */sig.sig_qua_img_lt z1
SET z1.nextver =
SYS.ltutil.subsversion
(z1.nextver,
SYS.ltutil.getcontainedverinrange (z1.nextver,
'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG',
'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ==',
4574,
4575
4574
WHERE z1.ROWID IN (
(SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_NL(T1) USE_NL(T2) USE_NL(J2) USE_NL(J3)
INDEX(T1 QIM_PK) INDEX(T2 SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$)
INDEX(J2 WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX) INDEX(J3 MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
t2.ROWID
FROM (SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t1,
sig.sig_qua_img_lt t2,
wmsys.wm$nextver_table j2,
(SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
UNIQUE VERSION
FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
AND VERSION > 4574
AND VERSION <= 4575) j3
WHERE t1.VERSION = j1.VERSION
AND t1.ima_id = t2.ima_id
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_x_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_x_tile
AND t1.qim_inf_esq_y_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_y_tile
AND t2.nextver != '-1'
AND t2.nextver = j2.next_vers
AND j2.VERSION = j3.VERSION))Hello Vitor,
There are currently no known issues with version enabled tables that are partitioned. The merge operation may need to access all of the partitions of a table depending on the data that needs to be moved/copied from the child to the parent. This is the reason for the 'Partition Range All' step in the plan that you provided. The majority of the remaining steps are due to the hints that have been added, since this plan has provided the best performance for us in the past for this particular statement. If this is not the case for you, and you feel that another plan would yield better performance, then please let me know and I will take a look at it.
One suggestion would be to make sure that the table was been recently analyzed so that the optimizer has the most current data about the table.
Performance issues are very hard to fix without a reproducible test case, so it may be advisable to file a TAR if you continue to have significant performance issues with the mergeWorkspace operation.
Thank You,
Ben -
"GUID partition table scheme" Can't install snow leopard on my mbp.
I have a mbp that is partitioned as half mac, half XP. I put in the snow leopard CD and came up with an error that said I could not istall snow leopard because my partition did not fit the "GUID partition table scheme". I followed the menues to the partition section of the disk utility. From there, I don't know what to do. I can't click on the "options" button to change to the GUILD thing. Do I need to repartition my entire mbp? Will this erase my other partition? And will it delete all my data? Any suggestions on what to do???
GUID partition table (GPT) or map is a set of instructions at the very begining of a storage drive to tell the hardware what partitions and formats are where on the drive.
A Intel Mac now requires a GPT to boot OS X as it uses EFI (Extensible Firmware Interface) which is a software firmware in a hidden EFI partition on the boot drive designed originally for copy protection by Intel. EFI loads into memory before OS X does, which can be seen if you have verbose mode activated upon boot time.
Setting up the boot drive with a GUID Partiton table WILL require backing up of all data off the machine and a complete erasure of ALL partitions on the drive, which includes ALL data, programs, operating systems and files not backed up off the machine previously.
Since a partition map is basically road directions, when it's destroyed so does go the partitions.
Also since you will be fresh installing 10.6, your free iLife won't tag along,, however you can erase/install 10.5 first then upgrade to 10.6 (no BootCamp) and that shoudl work.
Unfortunatly Mac's only now support Windows 7 in Bootcamp, however Windows 7 Pro (and above) will run XP programs natively or via free virtual machine XP downloaded from Microsoft, however since it's really not native, 3D games etc likely won't run very well.
If your not familiar or willing to take a chance, then I suggest you have someone else upgrade that machine.
https://discussions.apple.com/community/notebooks/macbook_pro?view=documents -
How to delete the data from partition table
Hi all,
Am very new to partition concepts in oracle..
here my question is how to delete the data from partition table.
is the below query will work ?
delete from table1 partition (P_2008_1212)
we have define range partition ...
or help me how to delete the data from partition table.
Thanks
Sree874823 wrote:
delete from table1 partition (P_2008_1212)This approach is wrong - as Andre pointed, this is not how partition tables should be used.
Oracle supports different structures for data and indexes. A table can be a hash table or index organised table. It can have B+tree index. It can have bitmap indexes. It can be partitioned. Etc.
How the table implements its structure is a physical design consideration.
Application code should only deal with the logical data structure. How that data structure is physically implemented has no bearing on application. Does your application need to know what the indexes are and the names of the indexes,in order to use a table? Obviously not. So why then does your application need to know that the table is partitioned?
When your application code starts referring directly to physical partitions, it needs to know HOW the table is partitioned. It needs to know WHAT partitions to use. It needs to know the names of the partitions. Etc.
And why? All this means is increased complexity in application code as this code now needs to know and understand the physical data structure. This app code is now more complex, has more moving parts, will have more bugs, and will be more complex to maintain.
Oracle can take an app SQL and it can determine (based on the predicates of the SQL), which partitions to use and not use for executing that SQL. All done totally transparently. The app does not need to know that the table is even partitioned.
This is a crucial concept to understand and get right. -
How can I add a new column in compress partition table.
I have a compress partition table when I add a new column in that table it give me an error "ORA-22856: CANNOT ADD COLUMNS TO OBJECT TABLES". I had cretaed a table in this clause. How can I add a new column in compress partition table.
CREATE TABLE Employee
Empno Number,
Tr_Date Date
COMPRESS PARTITION BY RANGE (Tr_Date)
PARTITION FIRST Values LESS THAN (To_Date('01-JUL-2006','DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION JUNK Values LESS THAN (MAXVALUE));
Note :
When I create table with this clause it will allow me to add a column.
CREATE TABLE Employee
Empno Number,
Tr_Date Date
PARTITION BY RANGE (Tr_Date)
PARTITION FIRST Values LESS THAN (To_Date('01-JUL-2006','DD-MON-YYYY')),
PARTITION JUNK Values LESS THAN (MAXVALUE));
But for this I have to drop and recreate the table and I dont want this becaue my table is in online state i cannot take a risk. Please give me best solution.Hi Fahed,
I guess, you are using Oracle 9i Database Release 9.2.0.2 and the Table which you need to alter is in OLTP environment where data is usually inserted using regular inserts. As a result, these tables generally do not get much benefit from using table compression. Table compression works best on read-only tables that are loaded once but read many times. Tables used in data warehousing applications, for example, are great candidates for table compression.
Reference : http://www.oracle.com/technology/oramag/oracle/04-mar/o24tech_data.html
Topic : When to Use Table Compression
Bug
Reference : http://dba.ipbhost.com/lofiversion/index.php/t147.html
BUG:<2421054>
Affects: RDBMS (9-A0)
NB: FIXED
Abstract: ENH: Allow ALTER TABLE to ADD/DROP columns for tables using COMPRESS feature
Details:
This is an enhancement to allow "ALTER TABLE" to ADD/DROP
columns for tables using the COMPRESS feature.
In 9i errors are reported for ADD/DROP but the text may
be misleading:
eg:
ADD column fails with "ORA-22856: cannot add columns to object tables"
DROP column fails with "ORA-12996: cannot drop system-generated virtual column"
Note that a table which was previously marked as compress which has
now been altered to NOCOMPRESS also signals such errors as the
underlying table could still contain COMPRESS format datablocks.
As of 10i ADD/SET UNUSED is allowed provided the ADD has no default value.
Best Regards,
Muhammad Waseem Haroon
[email protected] -
How can I create my own tag name while creating a partition table.
I have X4500 running Solaris 10. I have formatted a disk and created partition table as given below.
Specify disk (enter its number): 0
selecting c0t0d0
[disk formatted]
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 is part of active ZFS pool zpool1. Please see zpool(1M).
FORMAT MENU:
disk - select a disk
type - select (define) a disk type
partition - select (define) a partition table
current - describe the current disk
format - format and analyze the disk
fdisk - run the fdisk program
repair - repair a defective sector
label - write label to the disk
analyze - surface analysis
defect - defect list management
backup - search for backup labels
verify - read and display labels
inquiry - show vendor, product and revision
volname - set 8-character volume name
!<cmd> - execute <cmd>, then return
quit
format> partition
PARTITION MENU:
0 - change `0' partition
1 - change `1' partition
2 - change `2' partition
3 - change `3' partition
4 - change `4' partition
5 - change `5' partition
6 - change `6' partition
select - select a predefined table
modify - modify a predefined partition table
name - name the current table
print - display the current table
label - write partition map and label to the disk
!<cmd> - execute <cmd>, then return
quit
partition> print
Current partition table (original):
Total disk sectors available: 1953508749 + 16384 (reserved sectors)
Part Tag Flag First Sector Size Last Sector
0 usr wm 34 4.00GB 8388641
1 usr wm 8388642 2.00GB 12582945
2 usr wm 12582946 200.00GB 432013345
3 usr wm 432013346 175.00GB 799014945
4 usr wm 1166180386 375.43GB 1953508748
5 usr wm 799014946 175.00GB 1166016545
6 usr wm 1166016546 80.00MB 1166180385
8 reserved wm 1953508749 8.00MB 1953525132
partition>
I am unable to specify my own tag name. How can I change the tag name to one of my interest.
I need to create 3 partitions as told below
partitions:
/earth
/mars
/work
/earth and /work should be roughly equal in size, /mars should be twice the size of the others, if that is possible. If not 3 partitions of equal size will do.
Please, help me .
Thank you.Exactly 1TB? Slightly under/slightly over?
Traditional Solaris disk labels are in VTOC format, but this format cannot describe disks larger than 1TB. So EFI labels must be used on disks larger than 1TB. Setup is slightly different.
Are these physical disks or LUNs from a SAN array? If they are array LUNS, it is often the case that they don't have a Sun label of any type. So...
#1 Apply a Solaris label
If the LUNS don't have a label (when selected in 'format', it gives a warning that no label is present and offers to apply a label immediately). When run non-interactively, format assumes "yes" for any questions. So all you'd have to do is select every disk to have it apply labels to any unlabled disk. Run 'format' once and find the highest number (maybe it's 50 for you). Create a text file that looks like this:
disk 1
disk 2
disk 3
disk 50Then feed that to format like this:
# format -f /tmp/disklist or whatever you've named the file.
#2 Apply the partition layout to all disks you want.
You asked if you should do the same procedure, but I don't see that you've actually done anything above other than print out the existing layout. Take one of your 48 drives and partition it the way you want manually (set the slices to the sizes that you want). Then you can copy the layout of that disk to others. You only want to do this between disks/LUNs of the same size. As an example, if you've explicitly partitioned c1t0d0 and you want to apply this to c1t1d0, do this:
# prtvtoc /dev/rdsk/c1t0d0s2 | fmthard -s - /dev/rdsk/c1t1d0s2Repeat for all of your other disks.
Darren
Maybe you are looking for
-
Unable to find Oracle quote Lines Data
Hi, I have to find the query or any other data source which is getting the data for the Print quote report. I am unable to find out from where the data in report is being displayed. The Flow is like... Search for any quote. Click on the quote link On
-
Any hope for music folders on the ipod Touch?
Hi All It is getting VERY difficult to manage my music on my 32 Gb iPod Touch. I have hundreds of playlists (for example one playlist for every version of a classical piece; on playlist for a pop album, etc. etc.) Is there any hope for music folders
-
Error while testing FP_TEST_00
Hi, I configured ADS in my machine where ABAP and JAVA stacks are running on same WAS. I did so many times but i never faced this error while testing FP_TEST_00 program. i'am getting this errror "ADS:com.adobe.processingexception:problem accessing d(
-
How do I change the instance number 00 that Java Engine trys to connect to?
Hi All, I hope you may be able to advise me here.... I have a Solution Manager 4 installation that the Java Engine / Server 0 does not start on. When I look in the std_Server0.out log I see the below errors when trying to connect. What I see wrong h
-
In particular, the service to convert print forms into acrobat forms. Thnaks!