Reg. Error in material BRICKS order 10003000 item 0000

Dear Experts
When I do confirmation in CO11N i am getting the following error
Error in material BRICKS order 10003000 item 0000
Message no. RU119
Diagnosis
The data necessary for automatic goods movements in a confirmation is incomplete or contains errors.
System Response
Automatic goods movements were not carried out. Instead, the system wrote error records.
Procedure
Process the error records in one of the following transactions: If the variable parameters are appropriately set then once the confirmation has been created the system asks you whether you want to process the error records. If you answer is "yes" then the system branches to the material overview where you can carry out processing. You branch to the transaction for reprocessing error records from automatic goods movements.
Pls help me
Thanks in advance
Rajakumar.K

Quantity and Value update tick is made in OMS2 - MATERIAL TYPE then this problem is solved.
by myself
Edited by: Raja Kumar on Aug 26, 2009 2:48 PM

Similar Messages

Error message:Material document contains no items (order: 40000004 item: 00

Good Day SAP expert,
I have facing an error message on Material document contains no items (order: 40000004 item: 000010) & Message no. /DBM/COMMON286.
This error happen when I want to create Good Issue with action QGIS (Create Goods Issue (DBM)).
Steps that I create vehicle order:
1.     Go to /dbm/order01 and select 3010 u2013 Vehicle Order based on Model
2.     Then I create for a new customer with model sales code
3.     I save the vehicle order in DBM.
4.     I go to VELO to create vehicle on Peugeot model sales code and create PO, good receipt and incoming invoice.
5.     Then I use action QDBM to enable vehicle to DBM.
6.     I assign the vehicle (DBM) to my vehicle order (created based on model).
7.     The assignment is successful; therefore I would like to do Good Movement (good issue). Error : Material document contains no items pop up.
8.     I have try with create VELO, assign QDM and create 3000 u2013 vehicle order, Good Movement able to perform.
I apply snote 1527931 - Problem with reading of document flow on nonunicode systems.
Its doesn't work, system say still say that material document contains no items.
is it advisable change error message to warning message?
Please advice.
Thanks
regards,
ng chong chuan

I am not sure but this coudl be reason.
You have created a vehicle but you have not created the purchase order and Goods Recipt for the Vehicle, means the VEHICLE IS NOT IN YOUR INVENTORY
First check whether the vehicle is in inventory or not, if not then not possible to do Goods issue.

Reg WBS Element in Sales Order Line Item For Sales Order BOM

Hi ,
Greetings!!!!
I have a requirement, in a Sales Order I am Exploding BOM. After that Projects will be Created.
Once Project will be created i need to Assign WBS element for All Items in Sales Order.
My requirement is When I assign WBS element for Header Material (Parent Item) system will auto assign WBS for Child Items.
for this what Configuration I have to do.
Please do need full.
Thanks,
Regards,
Prasad.

Hi Dayananda
Check in transaction VTFL for given item category what copying routine are set. Check those copy routine and see if there is any data is being copied from table VBAP
Similar to above also check transaction VTFA for copying routine (if any)
As a standard SAP even we create an invoice with reference to the delivery document, still there are some data which is being copied from a sales order i.e. all pricing relevant information is copied from your sales order and not from delivery.

Sales order line item delete error for MTO sales order

Dear Experts
iam facing below error for MTO sales order line item deletion
"For reasons of cost management, item 000040 cannot
be deleted"
Please help
Regards,
KEdar

It looks you try to delete the sales order line item and you get this error message.
Try to put reason for rejection for the line item and save the order. This is equal to deleting the line item.
You can also refer the OSS note 14097 - Order item cannot be deleted/overwritten for further information.
Regards,

Error on union with order by clause

here is my sql.
i want sort this sql by start_timestamp.
select name,
enumber,
to_char(new_time(start_TimeStamp,'gmt','edt'),'MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS'),
ssn
from emp
where
ename = 'joh%'
and
start_TimeStamp9 > TO_DATE('2007-01-15 00:00:01','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and end_TimeStamp11 < TO_DATE('2007-01-18 22:59:59','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
union
select name,
enumber,
to_char(new_time(start_TimeStamp,'gmt','edt'),'MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS'),
ssn
from emp
where
ename = 'joh%'
and
start_TimeStamp9 > TO_DATE('2007-01-15 00:00:01','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and end_TimeStamp11 < TO_DATE('2007-01-18 22:59:59','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
union
select name,
enumber,
to_char(new_time(start_TimeStamp,'gmt','edt'),'MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS'),
ssn
from emp
where
ename = 'kris%'
and
start_TimeStamp9 > TO_DATE('2007-01-15 00:00:01','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and end_TimeStamp11 < TO_DATE('2007-01-18 22:59:59','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
union
select name,
enumber,
to_char(new_time(start_TimeStamp,'gmt','edt'),'MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS'),
ssn
from emp
where
ename = 'wal%'
and
start_TimeStamp9 > TO_DATE('2007-01-15 00:00:01','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
and end_TimeStamp11 < TO_DATE('2007-01-18 22:59:59','YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS')
order by 3;
i got this error.
ORA-01785: ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expression
start_timestamp is the 3rd column of the sql.
why i am getting this error.
i tried this also.
order by to_char(new_time(start_TimeStamp,'gmt','edt'),'MM/DD/YY HH24:MI:SS');
still i got error.

Also, be ready for a few surprises when you try to sort dates as strings (by using TO_CHAR):
test@XE> alter session set nls_date_format = 'mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss';
Session altered.
test@XE>
test@XE> --
test@XE> -- incorrect order
test@XE> --
test@XE> select num, dt
2 from (
3    select 1 as num, to_char(new_time(to_date('10/12/01 07:20:33',
4                                              'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt')) as dt from dual
5    union
6    select 2, to_char(new_time(to_date('07/22/07 08:10:23',
7                                       'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt')) as dt from dual
8    union
9    select 3, to_char(new_time(to_date('11/29/99 15:34:49',
10                                       'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt')) from dual
11 )
12 order by dt;
       NUM DT
         2 07/22/2007 04:10:23
         1 10/12/2001 03:20:33
         3 11/29/2099 11:34:49
test@XE>
test@XE> --
test@XE> -- correct order
test@XE> --
test@XE> select num, dt
2 from (
3    select 1 as num, new_time(to_date('10/12/01 07:20:33',
4                                      'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt') as dt from dual
5    union
6    select 2, new_time(to_date('07/22/07 08:10:23',
7                               'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt') from dual
8    union
9    select 3, new_time(to_date('11/29/99 15:34:49',
10                               'mm/dd/yy hh24:mi:ss'),'gmt','edt') from dual
11 )
12 order by dt;
       NUM DT
         1 10/12/2001 03:20:33
         2 07/22/2007 04:10:23
         3 11/29/2099 11:34:49
test@XE>
test@XE>I'd say it's best to sort dates as dates always, and never as strings.
isotope

Error while creating sales order for material with another DIVISION

Hello Friends,
I have a problem with my sales order creation.
I have defined a new sales area 0010 / 10 / 01. I have the sales order type assigned to this sales area. (in VOV8 for the sales order type, in the 'General Control' the 'item division' is flagged.
Now, I have created the sold to party XYZ with all the partner functions defaulted same as the sold to party for the sales area 0010 / 10 / 01.
NOW, I have the material ABC with the DIVISION 10 in the basic data. I have extended the material to my sales org & dist. channel & plant.
Now, while creating the sales order for my sales area 0010 / 10 / 01 , I enter the sold to party XYZ - it is OK. But when I enter the material ABC, I get the error - "SHIP TO PARTY IS NOT DEFINED FOR SALES AREA 0010 / 10 / 10"
Please help to resolve the issue.
Edited by: Vivek on Aug 13, 2009 9:04 AM

Hi
Common division for Material Master data will not work
Because in the material master Division is a field not an organizational unit
Means when you create MMR you will give sales org, DC, Plant as organizational units and then enter but not division
Division is a field maintained in basic data and sales org data 1
This is the reason in t code you will find in t code VOR2 Common division only customer and conditions but not materials
But in t code VOR1 Common DC ,customer conditions and materials all there are available (you can check these t codes)
Coming to your issue Item div is clecked in your order type
This means the division in MMR has the priority or control for that order type
Your header division is 01 ( taken from customers sales area) and item division is 10 (taken from MMR as per your post)
So it differs
To process this order with Item div is clecked in your order type you need to extend your Sold to party ABC to the sales area 0010/10/10 (the sales area where the division of the material falls)
or alternatively
There should be a customer say DEF created in sales area 0010/10/10 who will be a ship to party ( your error is also the same)
for your ABC that is sold to party in sales area 0010/10/01 where the order is registered
Hope yopu are getting it
ABC in sales area 0010/10/01 will have or should have ship to paty DEF in sales area 0010/10/10
or
ABC should operate in in sales area 0010/10/10 too
If item division is not ticked then these are not necessary as the header division 01 will be valid for all items and syatem will not look MMR at all for division
Regards
Raja

Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

Hi,
When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                Yes/No
1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
       Error when processing Production order
      Error when processing Production order
      Message no. V1380
      Diagnosis
        A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the following meanings:
1 = External block, 2 = General error, 3 = Insufficient data for the interface, 4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued. Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
"Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
We are using the requierement class with below details:
Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
Settlement profile contain:
Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
Let me know if you need any further details.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
ADI

Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

In DP50 Error during material determination for service order

Hi,
While doing Resources-Related Billing request,the following error is displaying..
Kindly Help
Error during material determination for service order
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
501384
Message no. AD01156
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
Thanks,
Mohit

Hi mohit,
You need to check DIP profile setting if profile is attached to your order type or not please check this
Thanks and regards
Sachin Kadam

Error :-Cancel transfer order for item

Hi,
The material has batch split and we are facing an error while cancelling transfer order for one item.Now here 4 items are there out of which item 1 is batch split i am able to cancel transfer order for 2,3 and 4 item whereas in item 1,sub category 10 (pick quantity is grade out) can you suggest why i am not able to cancel it.
Thanks,
Dharmesh

Hello,
Since item 10 is covered via WM hence the picking qty is grayed out.
You can go the document flow and find out for item 10 what is the TO no and also if its completed ( confirmed) or not. If its confirmed, then you cant cancel the TO.
If its no you can cancel the TO via LT15.
Thanks,

In Purchase Order Line item Maintaining Serial Numbers for Material Codes

Dear Gurus,
We have a business process in legacy system for Purchase Order like in PO line item, Material code with description, Quantity, unit of Measurement, Serial Number Start and Serial Number End is maintained, for example for Material code when we enter the data AXMLN00001 in Serial Number Start column, if the Qty 500 is maintained, by default system will calculate AXMLN00500 in Serial Number End column.
We understand that in standard SAP we donu2019t have this option of maintaining Serial Number Start and End in Purchase order Line item. Please let us know how this can be mapped and is it advisable to create two Z fields in EKPO table or else can we make any development.
Suppose if this is not possible in SAP for PO then in Banks if we want to place a order for Cheque books how we can maintain Start and End Serial Numbers to print in cheque books.
Also client is not agreeing to maintain manually Serial numbers in item text.
regards,
Dhanu

Aamir,
When the PO Item was created say for example Material had Valuation category "Y" and latter you wanted to change the category to "Y". Now system would have check for all open PO's etc...based on this you must have set Deletion Indicator to this Line Item to allow valuation category change in material master. Now when this Item got created in the table level (EKPO), system updates the valuation category "Y". Currently this valuation category is not active so it would not allow you to perform removal of deletion indicator as program cannot automatically nor you have an option to manually update the valuation category to this Item.
Regards,
Prasobh

ORA-01785 error :ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expressi

When i'm sorting on a calculated field i'm getting the following error:
ORDER BY item must be the number of a SELECT-list expression
Please any help?
Thanks

Here is the query, but its generated by the disco plus:
WITH
DISC_TMP_090921083714 as (
SELECT /*+ NOREWRITE */DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') as C_1,o787901.INVOICE_DT as E787916,SUM(o787901.USED_AMOUNT) as E787915_SUM,( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) )-( ( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) ) as C_4,( 0.8*( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) )-( ( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) ) as C_5,( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) as C_3,0.8*( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) as C_2,SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) as E787907_SUM,( ( SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) )/( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) ) ) as C_6,SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) as E787909_SUM,( SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) )-( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) ) as C_7,SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) as E787905_SUM,SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) as E787908_SUM
FROM ( select sum(t1.AMOUNT) po_paymnts,
(t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT/t2.PS_QTY) unit_cost_1,
t1.PO_NO,
t2.PS_QTY,
t2.AMOUNT encumb_amnt,
t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT,
T2.class district,
0 owner_id,
0 stock_id,
0 received_amount,
0 curr_amount,
0used_amount,
to_char(add_months(t1.INVOICE_DT,6),'YYYY') invoice_dt,
0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_ps_all_payments_fact t1,dwtarget.dw_ps_ap_po_rq_fact t2
where t1.PO_NO=t2.PS_NO
and t1.LINE_NO=t2.PS_LINE
and t2.OBJECT in ('545000','545001')
group by t1.PO_NO,T2.class,t2.PS_QTY,t2.AMOUNT,t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT,t2.class,to_char(add_months(t1.INVOICE_DT,6),'YYYY')
union all
select 0 unit_cost_1,0 po_paymnts,to_char(0) po_no,0 ps_qty,0 encumb_amnt,0 original_amount,to_char(t2.owner_cat) district, t1.owner_id, stock_id,
sum(received_amount) received_amount,
sum(curr_amount) curr_amount,
sum(used_amount) used_amount,
     date_work,
unit_cost
     from
(select owner_id_to owner_id,stock_id_to stock_id,sum(full_amount) received_amount,0 curr_amount,0 used_amount,null date_work,unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_transfer
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
and unit_id='724'
group by owner_id_to,stock_id_to,unit_cost
union all
select owner_id,stock_id,0 received_amount,sum(curr_amount) curr_amount,0 used_amount,null date_work,0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_inv
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
group by owner_id,stock_id
union all
select t2.owner_id, t1.stock_id, 0 received_amt, 0 curr_amt, sum(amount) used_amt,to_char(add_months(date_work,6),'YYYY') date_work,0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_wo_mat_dc t1,
(select owner_id,stock_id
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_inv
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
group by owner_id,stock_id)t2
where t1.stock_id = t2.stock_id
and unit_id='724'
group by t2.owner_id, t1.stock_id,to_char(add_months(date_work,6),'YYYY')) t1,
dwtarget.dw_wms_setup_owner t2
where t1.owner_id = t2.owner_id
group by t2.owner_cat,t1.owner_id,stock_id,date_work,unit_cost
) o787901
GROUP BY DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes'),o787901.INVOICE_DT
HAVING (( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) != 0))
SELECT C_1 as C_1,E787916 as E787916,E787915_SUM as E787915_SUM,C_4 as C_4,C_5 as C_5,C_3 as C_3,C_2 as C_2,E787907_SUM as E787907_SUM,C_6 as C_6,E787909_SUM as E787909_SUM,C_7 as C_7,E787905_SUM as E787905_SUM,E787908_SUM as E787908_SUM, 0
FROM DISC_TMP_090921083714
UNION ALL
SELECT /*+ NOREWRITE */C_1 as C_1,E787916 as E787916,E787915_SUM as E787915_SUM,C_4 as C_4,C_5 as C_5,C_3 as C_3,C_2 as C_2,E787907_SUM as E787907_SUM,C_6 as C_6,E787909_SUM as E787909_SUM,C_7 as C_7,E787905_SUM as E787905_SUM,E787908_SUM as E787908_SUM, GID as GID FROM (SELECT DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') as C_1,o787901.INVOICE_DT as E787916,SUM(o787901.USED_AMOUNT) as E787915_SUM,( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) )-( ( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) ) as C_4,( 0.8*( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) )-( ( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) ) as C_5,( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) )/( CASE WHEN ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) = 0 THEN ( ( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) )/( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) ) ELSE ( SUM(o787901.UNIT_COST) ) END ) as C_3,0.8*( SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) ) as C_2,SUM(o787901.PS_QTY) as E787907_SUM,( ( SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) )/( SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) ) ) as C_6,SUM(o787901.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT) as E787909_SUM,( SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) )-( SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) ) as C_7,SUM(o787901.PO_PAYMNTS) as E787905_SUM,SUM(o787901.ENCUMB_AMNT) as E787908_SUM,GROUPING_ID(( DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') ),o787901.INVOICE_DT) as GID
FROM ( select sum(t1.AMOUNT) po_paymnts,
(t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT/t2.PS_QTY) unit_cost_1,
t1.PO_NO,
t2.PS_QTY,
t2.AMOUNT encumb_amnt,
t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT,
T2.class district,
0 owner_id,
0 stock_id,
0 received_amount,
0 curr_amount,
0used_amount,
to_char(add_months(t1.INVOICE_DT,6),'YYYY') invoice_dt,
0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_ps_all_payments_fact t1,dwtarget.dw_ps_ap_po_rq_fact t2
where t1.PO_NO=t2.PS_NO
and t1.LINE_NO=t2.PS_LINE
and t2.OBJECT in ('545000','545001')
group by t1.PO_NO,T2.class,t2.PS_QTY,t2.AMOUNT,t2.ORIGINAL_AMOUNT,t2.class,to_char(add_months(t1.INVOICE_DT,6),'YYYY')
union all
select 0 unit_cost_1,0 po_paymnts,to_char(0) po_no,0 ps_qty,0 encumb_amnt,0 original_amount,to_char(t2.owner_cat) district, t1.owner_id, stock_id,
sum(received_amount) received_amount,
sum(curr_amount) curr_amount,
sum(used_amount) used_amount,
     date_work,
unit_cost
     from
(select owner_id_to owner_id,stock_id_to stock_id,sum(full_amount) received_amount,0 curr_amount,0 used_amount,null date_work,unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_transfer
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
and unit_id='724'
group by owner_id_to,stock_id_to,unit_cost
union all
select owner_id,stock_id,0 received_amount,sum(curr_amount) curr_amount,0 used_amount,null date_work,0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_inv
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
group by owner_id,stock_id
union all
select t2.owner_id, t1.stock_id, 0 received_amt, 0 curr_amt, sum(amount) used_amt,to_char(add_months(date_work,6),'YYYY') date_work,0 unit_cost
from dwtarget.dw_wms_wo_mat_dc t1,
(select owner_id,stock_id
from dwtarget.dw_wms_mat_inv
where master_code_id in ('8664','8665')
group by owner_id,stock_id)t2
where t1.stock_id = t2.stock_id
and unit_id='724'
group by t2.owner_id, t1.stock_id,to_char(add_months(date_work,6),'YYYY')) t1,
dwtarget.dw_wms_setup_owner t2
where t1.owner_id = t2.owner_id
group by t2.owner_cat,t1.owner_id,stock_id,date_work,unit_cost
) o787901
WHERE ( SYS_OP_MAP_NONNULL(DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes')) , SYS_OP_MAP_NONNULL(o787901.INVOICE_DT) ) IN ( SELECT SYS_OP_MAP_NONNULL(C_1) , SYS_OP_MAP_NONNULL(E787916) FROM DISC_TMP_090921083714)
GROUP BY GROUPING SETS(( ( DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') ),o787901.INVOICE_DT ),( ( DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') ) ))
HAVING GROUP_ID()=0
AND GROUPING_ID(( DECODE(( DECODE(( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') ),NULL,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )||o787901.DISTRICT,( DECODE(o787901.DISTRICT,'1000','D10','2000','D20','3000','D30','4000','D40','5000','D50','6000','D60') )) ),'D10','Crawfordsville','D20','Fort Wayne','D30','Greenfield','D40','LaPorte','D50','Seymour','D60','Vincennes') ),o787901.INVOICE_DT) != 0)
ORDER BY 14 DESC;
Thanks

Error during material determination for sales document item - RRB

Hi
Iam getting following error when trying to create a billing request using DP91.
Error during material determination for sales document item 40001560/000010
Message no. AD01155
Diagnosis
An error occured during material determination for a dynamic item.
System Response
The system cannot perform the function.
Procedure
Check in the profile being used whether its characteristic allows the assignment of a material to each dynamic item.
I have checked my DIP profile using ODP02 there are no errors in it, I have created a Setid and assigned it to costing element in selection criteria and material determination criteria.
Material origin is checked in costing tab in material master.
Appreciate help in resolving this.
thanks,
Vaishnavi

Hi Vaishnavi
The error which you are getting is related to costing.So kindly reach your FI Consultant
please check the following links which may help you.Also check the link that has been provided my Lakshmipathi
ERROR AT DP90 TRANSACTION
Regards
Srinath

Wrong Gross Weight for Material in Sales Order at Item Level (Shipping Tab)

Dear All,
Except MMR, where we maintain gross weight for material?
Or, from where Gross weight gets detrmined in Sales Order at item level (Shipping Tab)?
Details,
I've 2 Materials in Sales Order, Mat1 and Mat2.
In both the MMRs, Gross weight is 1.080 Kg
In sales Order Mat1 has Qty 18,000 Kg and gross weight is 19,440 Kg --> which is right.
Mat2 has Qty 2,160 Kg and gross weight is 2,332,800 Kg --> which is wrong.
I tried with maintaing another line item with Mat2 in Sales Order, for which again wrong gross weight is calculated.
I also tried with creating another Sales Order with Mat2, and again the same problem.
Thanks for your help, in advance.
Regds,
Yogi.

Hi,
Thanks. That has already been checked by me, in Basic data1 --> Additional Data --> Unit of measurements
everything is maintained correctly.
What I have noticed is:
Instead of obtaining Gross weight as 1.080 (which is maintained), somehow system is picking 1,080 (don't know why and from where)?
Regds,
yogi

Material Variant configuration in sales order line item from Ztable

Hello Experts,
we have configurable material and and creating sales order. from sales order line item if we goto configuration we can maintain variant configurations. My requirement is that when i click on configuration after selecting a line item i need to check ztable where i have material no and and relable text. if an entry exists i have to populate this relable text in one of the configuration filed. Can any one help how can i read and update configuration in sales order level and where to do this coding so that when i click on configuration the value from ztable populated in a field.
Many thanks in advance.

Hi Senthil,
It is simple.
When you create a characteristic which should have the value maintained in the Z table, go to the tab values. Here you have a push button called "Other Value check". Here you click this button and select the function module option. Now, in the window, you will have a place where you can mention the name of teh function module.
You create a function module with the help of your developer to find out the text maintained in the Z table using teh rules you have in your mind and update that logic in the characteristic. In the earlier screen, you just have to mention the name of the function module, thats all, your work is done.
Now when you configure, for this characteristic, the value will be automatically determined using teh function module. You have to create such characteristics as "Not ready for input" ones in additional data for which you cannot enter values manually.
Hope this helps.

Sales order costing error found in quotation 2 order line items created in

Sales order costing error found in quotation 2 order line items created in quotation 5000562
1st line item with third party
2nd line item with PTO
Purchase price was entered in the configuration screen
1st item : 2,000 EUR
2nd item: 1,200 EUR
Purchasing info record was created with variant condition for EUR
Error in sales order costing:-
System does not take the purchase price in the configuration screen to
calculate sales order costing. It incorrectly took 1 EUR from variant
condition in sales order costing for both items.
By right, it should take purchase price from configuration screen.
Pls advise
Thanks

no replies and my thread was dead.

Reg. Error in material BRICKS order 10003000 item 0000

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for