Reg: Weblogic handling of poison messages

Hi
I am using a j2ee application in weblogic 10.3.1 listening to MQ Queue using jms bindings created through jms admin
Now my requirement is , when there is an exception in the application due to any resource like DB ,(Exception is thrown causing backout of message to the Mq queue)
my application should stop processing message after retrying the message for certain retry limit .
Then when the resource is recovered , say DB is brought up, and when the weblogic app server is restarted , it should start processing the messages again
How can i achieve this ? Through deployment descriptors or through bindings creation or how?
Pls help, urgent . .

Hi thanks for ur reply
But am afraid these options are available only for JMS Queues . .
Here my JMS provider is MQ and the queue is a foreign queue
Are these options available in case of foreign resources?
And I read from a link ( http://middleware.its.state.nc.us/middleware/Documentation/en_US/htm/csqzaw09/csqzaw0939.htm ) that in some cases by default backout threshold value of binded MQJMS queue is 20. If that is right, how to override this value.
" On some platforms, you cannot specify the threshold and requeue queue properties. On these platforms, messages are sent to the dead-letter queue, or discarded, when the backout count reaches 20 "
Please correct me if I am wrong
Thanks in advance

Similar Messages

My JMS 2 wish list - Part 2, poison messages management

I attended the JavaOne 2010 session on future JMS evolutions. During the session I described some current limitations or issues I'd like to be solved in a portable way. I've been adviced to share the issues to get feedback from the community. I will post each issue in a dedicated thread.
Issue 2 - Poison messages management
Poison messages are messages that are redelivered again and again when an untreated error occurs, possibly resulting in CPU eating long lasting loops.
This is a well known messaging related issue, but it is not fully adressed by the JMS specification. The Message:getJMSRedelivered method can tell if a message is being redelivered. But this is not good enough and application servers implement their own solutions. Such solutions are based, for example, on redelivery limit and error destinations.
With WebSphere 6, it is possible to specify, at the SI Bus destination level, an exception destination and a maximum failed deliveries threshold. When messages consumption fails more than the threshold allows, messages are moved to the exception destination.
JBoss 4 has equivalent features, with a dead letter queue where messages that reached the redelivery limit are moved. It is also possible to use the specific 'JMS_JBOSS_REDELIVERY_DELAY' message property to specify a redelivery delay from the message producer side. JBoss 5 has the same features with the 'dead-letter-address', 'max-delivery-attempts' and 'redelivery-delay' destination configuration parameters.
WebLogic has equivalent features, see 'Error Destination', 'Redelivery Limit' and 'Redelivery Delay' parameters.
A portable mechanism should be defined.
Edited by: 807264 on Nov 3, 2010 6:01 AM

gimbal2 wrote:
A portable solution would be useful.You could already do it now by leveraging the Timer functionality that has been part of the EJB spec since JEE 1.4. In stead of sending the message directly, let the timer do it after the delay you specify. That would make it portable with current tech.
I can't be sure what other implications that might have though, such as in the area of performance and resource usage - I can imagine you wouldn't want to use a timer when you need to send large volumes of messages.In the original requirement, the message is put in the queue immediately by a call to queuesender.send(message) and there's a delivery in delay to a consumer.
Whereas in this solution, the delay is in the message delivery to the queue itself.
IMHO there's a subtle but important difference here.What would for example happen if posting the message to the queue is in the scope of a distributed JTA transaction? You can definitely include the timer call to be in the scope of the transaction, but now you will have to account for the fact and there may be an error when the message is delivered which has to be handled explicitly. In the original scenario the tx would automatically rollback.
cheers,
ram.

Reprocessing poison messages

Hi all,
We are using weblogic v923. We are using Spring JMS API (MDP, context files) to listen and process the JMS messages from the Weblogic cluster's distributed error queues.
In some cases we observe bad formatted data which needs manual correction. Such messages, we are treating them as poison messages by setting a boolean and a string property on the JMS message and put them back on the error queue and use the message selector on the spring defaultmessagelistnercontainer to filter out those messages so that they are not reprocessed.
Now, how to fix the poison message and reprocess it? Is it possible to correct the message content and revert the boolean and string properties that were originally set to mark it as a poison message?
Is there a way that weblogic allows to edit the message in the admin console? If not, what are the best ways to accomplish this?
Thanks in advance for your valuable input.

There's no way to edit a message while it sits in a queue.
It would be possible to use WLST scripting, java mbeans, or the console to export the message to a file, delete the original problem message, and then import the message back into the main queue -- but I think this is complex and error prone.
Ideally, I recommend modifying your error processing MDP to forward messages that require administrator intervention to a new queue, and then writing a simple application that your admins can use to (A) dequeue the problem message from the new queue, (B) edit the message, and (C) inject the edited message back into the system.
Tom

Handling SOAP Fault messages in BPM

Hi,
My scenario is Sync-Async Bridge involving File to SOAP transformation. I have used BPM as 1 file has many records and each record is required to call the web service synchronously.
In the BPM I have
Receive ---> Transform (1:n multimapping ) -
> Block (Par for Each)
In Block I have Send Sync step to call Web service . I have an exception branch for the send step for catching Fault message that is sent back from webservice for Application Fault.
Problem:
Though the Fault message is sent from web service ,in the BPM the block goes in error saying : "No exception defined for fault message ". The Exception brach is not executed.
Please suggest if anyone has come across such a scenario and solution to this.

hi satesh
using "exception handler" in BPM we can handle the error messages
regards
kummari

Handling SOAP Fault Message in BPM

Hello XI SDN'ers,
I am getting SOAP Fault Message in my SOAP Scenario and I am not aware of Handling that error in my BPM. Could any one tell me, How to handle such error's in BPM?
Thanks & Regards,
Satish.

hi satesh
using "exception handler" in BPM we can handle the error messages
regards
kummari

Error Handling and Error Messages

I already posted this in the java programming forum, but I dont think the people responded understand patterns, or what I was asking. Here is my original post, for reference I am not asking how to catch and exception, or how to display an error, I am asking about the pattern implementation.
I am currently in the process of creating my Exception model for my program, and I have a question about error messages. I was reading the book "Effective Java Programming" which deals with patterns and it states that an exception should state the error and report information on all relavent states. For instance If you have a class the modeled some sort of memory array, and an access was requested to a block of memory outside the array you should throw an ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException("Index:" + index + ", start:" + 0 + ",end:" + Array.length) or if you made your own MemoryAddressOutOfBoundsException(same as above) which when printed should read
ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: Index:-1, start:0, end:0
stack trace
The pertinate information is the index, start index, and end index.
The book CLEARLY states as an industry design pattern that exceptions weather checked or unchecked should not contain user error messages. For instance with the above example one might be tempted to use this as the exception message: "The memory addres index is not a valid memory address." This is clearly a user error message.
So heres my situation. In a gui environment (command line console not visible) how do you generated a user error message, letting the user know that an internal exception has occured.
In my previous implementation of my project, I used the exception message the user error message and just reported the message on a dialog. I have heard of people using error catalogs, which centrallizes all the error messages into a single class or file.
I was wondering if and Error catalog was a good approach, how I might go about implementing one, and if not how do you the community handle user error messages.

class MyAppErrors {
   public static final int FILE_NOT_FOUND = 0;
   public static final int DIR_NOT_FOUND = 1;
   public stat final String[] errMsgs = {
      "The file was not found.",
      "The directory was not found.",
   public String getErrMsg( int n ) { return errMsgs[n]; }
[\code]
And a nicer version would allow the calling code to pass in a substring so you could say "The file 'somename.ext' was not found."

How to Handle the error message?

Hi,
Can any one help me in handling the error messages in application,
In my application, I am having 2 buttons, one is display button, and the other is reset button. When we enter wrong inputs, it prompts an error message and again we I click on reset button the application goes back to its normal stage i.e. the error message will be disappears. These things will happen in the same page. I have tryed to know the any Id/Name of error message.
So please help to handle error and skip that error then continue execute raming code.
Thanks
Buntty

A few problems with this question that need clarification:
You're using a GUI, but we have no way of knowing which one -- Swing? AWT? SWT? other?
You ask how to fix your program flow and logic but don't show us the current state. Most of us can't read minds so a bit of code would be nice here.
You mention "Page". What context is this in?
A great resource that has helped me and will probably help you is an article entitled [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way|http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html] . It will tell you how to formulate your questions so that the folks here will be better able to answer them. Good luck.

Handling Multiple Error Messages through EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 for ME28

Dear Team,
After Executing ME28, system will give List of PO's that are to be Released . User will select Multiple PO's and
Press Release button in Application toolbar. once it is relased, User will press save Icon for all released PO's.
Once Save icon is presed, I need to do Validation for Multiple PO's in the user Exit EXIT_SAPMM06E_012 and capture my
ErrorMessages for all Released PO's for which Validation fails.
Here in the given user Exit, one PO will be processed at a time as PO is defined as Import Parameter but it will handle all PO's
and give the output in status bar saying 'Relased Saved' for all PO's which succesfully gonethrough.
once we execute ME28, system is showing list output with PO's to be Released(As system is handling with Write statments). In this case, we dont have scenario of PBO and PAI Modules( where user can correct error if any validation fails) like we have for ME22,etc.
I have Written simpel Error Message in the User Exit.
once i tried to trigger my user exit by Releasing and Saving with One PO, Error Message is displayed ( as information Message
appears) and if i Press Exit button in Error Message, it is coming out of Transaction.
Is there any Possibilty to Handle Multiple Error Messages ( in my case for Valdiation Failed Po's) in ME28 ,after Releasing and Saving , and also user should not come out of Transaction once Error Messages are Displayed.
Thanks and Regards
Suresh

Hi Suresh,
there is a tekpo table to handle all po items. you can put it in loop and do validations.
if any errors through, there may be a ex_messages table of type bapiret2.
or
try like this: MESSAGE E368(00) WITH TEXT-001 TEXT-002.
thanks
srinu
Edited by: srinu rao on Sep 22, 2009 3:43 AM

WLC 5508 - LAP1242: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller

Hello everyone,
after finally successfully upgrading my WLCs from 6.0.199.4 to 7.6.100.0 there is another problem showing up...
If I want to change any configuration regarding the APs on the WLCs (which doesn't work) I get the following error-messages from the APs:
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.169: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Validate Msg: msg type 12 does not supported payload 215
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.169: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Validate Msg: error in Unknown Payload(215) payload (received length = 9, payload type = 215)
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to validate vendor specific message element type 215 len 9.
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to decode Configuration update request.
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.170: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 7 state 11.
*spamApTask7: Feb 27 14:34:00.558: 00:3a:9a:d6:5d:30 Test-AP-09-03: *Feb 27 13:34:00.171: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
Find attached some informations regarding the AP and the 5508.
Any suggestions are, as always, highly appriciated.
Regards
Manuel

Good morning,
if I need free space at the flash: How much is "enough" to handle config changes?
Here you can see the filesystem of one of my accesspoints (all are affected):
AP#dir all-filesystems
Directory of arch:/
    2 -rwx       91288 Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00 event.log
    8 drwx         448 Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00 c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
    4 drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00 configs
    5 -rwx         397 Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00 env_vars
    6 -rwx        6168 Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00 private-multiple-fs
No space information available
Directory of flash:/
    2 -rwx       91288 Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00 event.log
    8 drwx         448 Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00 c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
    4 drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00 configs
    5 -rwx         397 Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00 env_vars
    6 -rwx        6168 Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00 private-multiple-fs
15740928 bytes total (10614784 bytes free)
Directory of zflash:/
    2 -rwx       91288 Feb 22 2014 18:16:42 +00:00 event.log
    8 drwx         448 Feb 22 2014 18:16:38 +00:00 c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAO3
    4 drwx           0   Nov 2 2011 23:32:18 +00:00 configs
    5 -rwx         397 Feb 22 2014 18:19:03 +00:00 env_vars
    6 -rwx        6168 Feb 27 2014 18:14:24 +00:00 private-multiple-fs
15740928 bytes total (10614784 bytes free)
Directory of archive:/
No files in directory
No space information available
Directory of system:/
    2 dr-x           0                    memory
    1 -rw-       17631                    running-config
No space information available
Directory of nvram:/
   30 -rw-           0                    startup-config
   31 ----           0                    private-config
    1 ----        4100                    lwapp_ap.cfg
    6 ----         528                    lwapp_ap_tlv.cfg
32768 bytes total (26572 bytes free)
Regards, Manuel

Weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size:

Hi ,
I have problems with the maximun message size using T3. I am trying to get large data from a remote client but i get the following exception(Here we are accessing jasper reports thru tomcat server from Weblogic,Tomcat and weblogic servers are in different machines). Even after setting the value -Dweblogic.MaxMessageSize parameter as '20000000', still the problem is alive on my tomcat system.
following is the error:
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: ; nested exception is:
weblogic.socket.MaxMessageSizeExceededException: Incoming message of size: '10000080' bytes exceeds the configured maximum of: '10000000' bytes for protocol: 't3'
Could any one suggest us to resolve this problem, Greatly appricated.
Regards,
Venkata Kumar

Hi,
Here we have weblogic and tomcat servers are running on different servers(Even both app server and web server on same m\c also we are facing same problem).this problem am facing while accessing jasper reports which contains results set more than 37000 records, am able to retreive the jasper reports successfully till 37000 records and if u provide query more than 37000 this is problem am encountering in tomcat side.I have deployed my jasper iReports stuff in weblogic server and web related stuff under tomcat server.
i am able to retreive the data successfully till 37000 records and more than that creating this problem on tomcat side.
Please let me know if you any more information on this issue.
Thanks a lot for quick response!
Thanks,
Venkata

MsmqPoisonMessageException thrown for retried, not poisoned, messages

Hi,
I wrote an IErrorHandler and report poison messages. However, the exception gets fired not only for poison messages but for messages being successfully retried as well.
Our configuration:
retryCount=1 (because we want to enforce a delay before each retry)
retryCyclesCount=12
delay=10 seconds
errorHandling="move"
MSMQ 4 on Win2k8.
Questions:
1. Is the exception thrown when *both* counts exceeded together? In my example when 12 retries occured the first exception is thrown?
2. Or is it thrown as soon as the message is moved into the retry queue and again thrown when the message is moved finally in the poison queue? Documentation is not 100% clear at this point.
Thanks,
Alex
Alex

Yes, the documentation is never 100% clear with Microsoft. What you are seeing is what I see as well, I believe the poison message exception is thrown when you exceed the retry count, so with 12 retry cycles, it will be thrown 13 times (one for the
original try and then one for each of the 12 retry cycles).

JMS - Poisones message

Hi,
I want to manage "poisoned" messages problem with my java application using JMS API.
I have set this parameters on MQ server:
-BOQNAME('PRT.REQUEST.BOQ')
Name of queue to which applications should write messages that have been backed out.
-BOTHRESH (3)
Number of processing attempts for each message.
Putting the rollebacked massage in a BOQNAME queue is no automatic but It's necessary to modify my code.
I must check the backout count on every message read, and if it is non-zero, compare it to the backout threshold defined on the queue. If the count is greater than the threshold, the message should be written to the queue specified in the BOQNAME parameter and committed.
So I have tried the property on JMS to fell out the backout count on a message.
It's msg.getIntProperty("JMSXDeliveryCount").
I need to compare this JMSXDeliveryCount with BOTHRESH and send the message on BOQNAME.
How can I read BOTHRESH and BOQNAME on a Queue using JMS API?
Thanks in advance.
T.

In case You are refering to Websphere MQ, there's an example using the WMQ Java libraries:
http://www-304.ibm.com/jct09002c/isv/tech/sample_code/mq/backout.java
It's not part of any JMS spec, but maybe it's useful to You.

C++ How to know what link is clicked on a Balloon tooltip after handle the TTN_LINKCLICK message

switch (msg) {
case WM_NOTIFY:
NMHDR* nmhdr = (LPNMHDR)lparam;
switch(nmhdr->code) {
case TTN_LINKCLICK:
<code>
return TRUE;
I'm able to trap the TTN_LINKCLICK notification. However I would like to retrieve the URL text link that was clicked.
How to know what link is clicked on a Balloon tooltip after handle the TTN_LINKCLICK message ?
MCunha

Basically you don't know what link was clicked. If you need more than one link, you may need to use a different UI element to display it, like a dialog or some sort of other popup window that you have control over.

Weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: No message was received for: '240' seconds

Hi to All
when i am trying to retrieve huge amount of data using the application deployed in the weblogic server 9.1
i am getting the following exception at the client side...
my client was using "weblogic.jar" to run and compile...
this application will take 10-15 mins to process the request.. but i am getting this exception at the 5 min of the request...
the exception follows.....
weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: No message was received for: '240' seconds
at weblogic.rjvm.ResponseImpl.unmarshalReturn(ResponseImpl.java:191)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef
.java:315)
at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableRemoteRef.invoke(ClusterableRemoteRef
.java:250)
at com.nybot.prd.businesscomponent.ProductDictionaryMaintenanceBean_etiu
ur_EOImpl_910_WLStub.retrieveInstruments(Unknown Source)
at RetrieveFuturesInstruments.testInstruments(RetrieveFuturesInstruments
.java:67)
at RetrieveFuturesInstruments.main(RetrieveFuturesInstruments.java:87)
S.Prabhu

Senthamarai Prabhu wrote:
Hi to All
when i am trying to retrieve huge amount of data using the application
deployed in the weblogic server 9.1 i am getting the following exception
at the client side... my client was using "weblogic.jar" to run and
compile... this application will take 10-15 mins to process the request..
but i am getting this exception at the 5 min of the request...
the exception follows.....
weblogic.rjvm.PeerGoneException: No message was received for: '240'Hi,
Just increase the timeout on JTA level
B
Schelstraete Bart
[email protected]
http://www.schelstraete.org
http://www.linkedin.com/in/bschelst

Failed to handle capwap control message from controller

Hello,
I am struggling in associating a 1242 AP's with WLC's.
Show version of the AP:
Cisco IOS Software, C1240 Software (C1240-K9W8-M), Version 12.4(25e)JAM2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
Copyright (c) 1986-2013 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Mon 29-Jul-13 11:32 by prod_rel_team
ROM: Bootstrap program is C1240 boot loader
BOOTLDR: C1240 Boot Loader (C1240-BOOT-M) Version 12.3(7)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
AP0019.56b0.855e uptime is 9 minutes
System returned to ROM by power-on
System image file is "flash:/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2/c1240-k9w8-mx.124-25e.JAM2"
Show inventory of the AP:
AME: "AP1240", DESCR: "Cisco Aironet 1240 Series (IEEE 802.11a/g) Access Point"
PID: AIR-LAP1242AG-E-K9, VID: V01, SN: FCZ10408384
When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 6.0.199.4, the AP keeps on downloading image and power cycling.
When trying to attach it to a WLC 5508 running 7.4.110.0, the AP shows the following message :
Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
*Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
*Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
*Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
*Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
*Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
*Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
*Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
*Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
*Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
*Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
*Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7 Jan 30 08:24:56.372: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: GOING BACK TO DISCOVER MODE
*Jan 30 08:24:56.373: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 10.71.142.7:5246
*Jan 30 08:24:56.427: %LWAPP-3-CLIENTERRORLOG: LWAPP LED Init: incorrect led state 255
*Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to administratively down
*Jan 30 08:24:56.445: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to administratively down
*Jan 30 08:24:56.447: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:56.484: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:57.445: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:57.473: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:57.478: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to reset
*Jan 30 08:24:58.466: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:58.473: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:58.503: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:58.508: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:58.513: %LINK-5-CHANGED: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to reset
*Jan 30 08:24:59.503: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio0, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:24:59.508: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to down
*Jan 30 08:24:59.532: %LINK-6-UPDOWN: Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:25:00.532: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface Dot11Radio1, changed state to up
*Jan 30 08:25:06.483: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller
*Jan 30 08:25:07.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
*Jan 30 08:25:08.565: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSUCC: DTLS connection created sucessfully peer_ip: 10.71.142.7 peer_port: 5246
*Jan 30 08:25:08.567: %CAPWAP-5-SENDJOIN: sending Join Request to 10.71.142.7
*Jan 30 08:25:08.598: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Invalid event 10 & state 5 combination.
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: CAPWAP SM handler: Failed to process message type 10 state 5.
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to handle capwap control message from controller
*Jan 30 08:25:08.599: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Failed to process encrypted capwap packet from 10.71.142.7
Any idea ?
Many thanks !

here is the debug output:
login as: groupwls
(Cisco Controller)
User: groupwls
Password:************
Your password does not meet the strong password requirements.For added security,                                                                              set a new password that meets these requirements. To prevent this message from                                                                              showing again, disable the strong password feature.
(Cisco Controller) >debug pm pki enable
(Cisco Controller) >debug capwap events enable
(Cisco Controller) >*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.639: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection not found, creating new connection for 10:64:94:52 (2134) 10:71:142:8 (5246)
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 155224fa
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.640: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: called to get key for CID 155224fa
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >cscoDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.641: sshpmGetSshPrivateKeyFromCID: match in row 2
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: locking ca cert table
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_alloc() for user cert
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.883: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: calling x509_decode()
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: C=US, ST=California, L=San Jose, O=Cisco Systems, CN=C1240-001956b0855e, [email protected]
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: O=Cisco Systems, CN=Cisco Manufacturing CA
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Mac Address in subject is 00:19:56:b0:85:5e
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert Name in subject is C1240-001956b0855e
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: Cert is issued by Cisco Systems.
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: called to get cert for CID 2f6d981f
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 0, certname >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 1, certname >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 2, certname >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 3, certname >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 4, certname >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: sshpmGetCertFromCID: comparing to row 5, certname >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.887: ssphmUserCertVerify: calling x509_decode()
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: ssphmUserCertVerify: user cert verfied using >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (current): 2014/01/30/09:46:38
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotBefore): 2006/10/05/13:05:43
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: ValidityString (NotAfter): 2016/10/05/13:15:43
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetIssuerHandles: getting cisco ID cert handle...
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: called to evaluate
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, CA cert >bsnOldDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, CA cert >bsnDefaultRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, CA cert >bsnDefaultCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 3, CA cert >bsnDefaultBuildCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 4, CA cert >cscoDefaultNewRootCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 5, CA cert >cscoDefaultMfgCaCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 0, ID cert >bsnOldDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 1, ID cert >bsnDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.898: sshpmGetCID: comparing to row 2, ID cert >cscoDefaultIdCert<
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: called with 0x2c058e50
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:38.906: sshpmFreePublicKeyHandle: freeing public key
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Allocated index from main list, Index: 312
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane are plumbed successfully for AP 10.64.94.52. Index 313
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS Session established server (10.71.142.8:5246), client (10.64.94.52:2134)
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.169: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Starting wait join timer for AP: 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.199: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.200: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deleting AP entry 10.64.94.52:2134 from temporary database.
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Version: = 117730816
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join resp: CAPWAP Maximum Msg element len = 87
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Join
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 capwap_ac_platform.c:1225 - Operation State 0 ===> 4
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.201: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.202:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Register LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203: WARP IEs: (12)
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:40.203:      [0000] dd 0a 00 c0 b9 01 00 00 00 08 01 01
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:41.023: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:44.029: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:47.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:50.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:53.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Configuration Status from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 CAPWAP State: Configure
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP info for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 -- static 0, 10.64.94.52/255.255.255.0, gtw 10.64.94.254
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.021: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Updating IP 10.64.94.52 ===> 10.64.94.52 for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:56.022: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Setting MTU to 1485
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.019: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS keys for Control Plane deleted successfully for AP 10.64.94.52
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 DTLS connection closed event receivedserver (10:71:142:8/5246) client (10:64:94:52/2134)
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Entry exists for AP (10:64:94:52/2134)
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.026: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 0
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 apfSpamProcessStateChangeInSpamContext: Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
*apfReceiveTask: Jan 30 09:46:59.027: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Deregister LWAPP event for AP 00:19:07:c6:39:60 slot 1
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:46:59.028: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 No AP entry exist in temporary database for 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.127: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.128: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:46:59.129: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.995: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask2: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2134
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:28.996: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.856: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Received LWAPP DISCOVERY REQUEST to 44:2b:03:b4:39:cf on port '13'
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Request from 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Join Priority Processing status = 0, Incoming Ap's Priority 1, MaxLrads = 50, joined Aps =0
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask3: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discovery Response sent to 10.64.94.52:2135
*spamApTask0: Jan 30 09:47:58.857: 00:19:07:c6:39:60 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP supporting CAPWAP
*sshpmLscTask: Jan 30 09:48:10.688: sshpmLscTask: LSC Task received a message 4

Reg: Weblogic handling of poison messages

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for