Regarding Reconciliation a/c

hi friends,
is it possible to transfer balance of reconciliation a/c to new reconciliation a/c.
cheerz..
raj

Hi,,
Is ur report,,a PCA COPA reconcillation report,,,
Yes u can transfer it,,,V had a same requirement but v moved this report to R/3 dev,,coz this basically develops better in OLTP rather than OLAP,,,or if u persist in b/w,,then u can create a Ztable out of the ABAP logic,,,and make a Datasource out of,,,The fields in Ztable shall contain only the Filterd output columns with filter data,,,then u can maintain a delta in Datasource
Hope it helps

Similar Messages

  • Regarding REconciliation GL account for Sundry creditors

    Dear all,
    Issue is like that,
    I have one vendor with which i have assigned reco. account 28000. I have already passed postings.
    Now i have changed in same vendor master reco. account 28010 from 28000.
    Now the problem is that the entry already posted before changes it shows in 28000, i want to transfer it to 28010.
    How can i change it..........?
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi,
    You can clear the old items posted in 28000 with the other leg in suspense / clearing GL Account.
    Once the above is done, please post once again to Vendor clearing the suspense / clearing account.
    Ensure that the suspense / clearing account does not have any open items.
    The lines are transfered to new recon account.
    Hope this helps, if yes, please assign points.
    Regards,
    Sankar

  • Regarding Reconciliation of Organisation Unit in OIM

    I am running a scheduler for reconciling OU's which has a built in class like ADGroupLookupRecon. But reconciling is not happening. By using an existing method addLookUpValue of tcLookupOperationsIntf class, I'm trying to insert code.
    But I was struck in writing that to provide sync between OIM and directory. Could anyone give me your suggestions on this issue.

    Can you please provide some more information about what you've done and what exactly isn't working?

  • BIS E-Mail

    Dear Guys and Girls,
    in our company we have Blackberry mobile Phones for some workers and they get their E-Mails from Company Account on it. 
    This works great so long, but we have a problem with readed/unreaded messages - ih they read a message on their mobile phone so it is marked as readed message in on outlook too, but if they read a message on outlook they have to read it again on their mobile phone .....
    Is there any way to "syncronize" the e-mails better than they were this moment?
    Thank you for your answers!
    Best regards,
    Manu

    Hi there!
    It sounds like you have a very "normal" configuration:
    MS Exchange Server
    Outlook Clients
    OWA
    BB's reconciling OTA against OWA via BIS
    In that configuration, this KB will apply regarding reconciliation features...which, sadly for your desires, means it is WAD (Working As Designed).
    If you desire more features, you might want to look into BES Express...the price is right!
    Good luck!
    Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
    If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
    Join our BBM Channels
    BSCF General Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • Regarding manual bank reconciliation

    dear experts
    i am having one problem, i configured manual bank statement in my system & make a zreport
    for reconciliation but the problem is that my enduser want unprocessed batch data & value in that report
    example
    i received my bank statement with 20 transactions some transations made through net banking
    there is no entry of those transactions
    i upload the statement & posted &run in sm35 in that 20 transactions 10 processed 10 remain
    in sm35
    is this possible to fetch data & value in that batch of that 10 transctions
    please help me
    regards
    nitin shukla

    See when you are doing FF67 the transfer of entries from the sub account main account it self is a realisation date. In case that is not so, assumning the user attempts BRS on a monthly basis, take the help of "Value date" in the variant and populate this. This should solve your problem.when you create a UDF (I understand as User defgined Field) it doesn't automaticallty appear in BRS. It only appears in code block which will popuate only at the time of running batch input session.
    Try for the aboe and ity should work for you.
    reward if useful.
    sarma

  • FF67-Manual Bank Reconciliation....question regarding automatic clearing

    Hi
    Dear experts,
    I have a question regarding manual bank reconciliation, everything is working fine as far as FF67 is concerned but I am having a problem with auto clearing for cheques received in, I know that an algorithm decides which field should be taken into account for deciding the clearing items as the cheques issued out is working fine by the cheque number, for cheques received in what algorithm should be used and in what field should I enter that in Tcode F-28 so that it clears the document automatically. OR will I have to create a algorithm, if so from where?
    Thanks to all who reply
    regards

    You can use an algorithm like bank reference, document search, etc. 021 or 020.  While making the entries for cheque receipt (customer) you have to put the cheque number in the reference field and at the time of clearing the transactions from the statement, please ensure that the same cheque number is i put in the clearing data.

  • Regarding Data Reconciliation

    Hi,
    As i understand that Data Reconciliation is used to check the consistency of the data between the source and the BI.
    I have a small doubt in this regard,
    When i went through the SAP Library i saw the two terms
    1) Productive Datasource and
    2) Datasource for data reconciliation
    Are these two data sources same or not?
    If i tick mark the option Data Reconciliation option in the Datasource, the same is used to transfer the data to the normal infocube and if i implement a virtual cube does the same data source is used to transfer the DS or does i need to create another
    Please clear my doubt
    Thanks in Advance,
    K Janardhan Kumar

    Hi Janardhan,
        Go thourh this How to... Doc.
    <a href="https://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.comhttp://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14">How To… Reconcile Data Between SAP Source Systems and SAP NetWeaver BI</a>
    Hope it Helps
    Srini

  • Help needed regarding bank reconciliation

    In ff67, when I process the batch input session. I get the following error.
    "No batch input data for screen sapmf05a 710" sap message no. 00344

    Ok, I see  your main account number is 12120500. so ideally your other Gls related to outgoing and incoming payments etc should be  12120501 or 12120502. Thats how we teach the system also (This pattern ) when we assign the accounts to account symbol. refer below screen shot.
    In your case however if I refer the first screen shot, the GL you have showed is 12150611 which is completely different. Not that it cannot happen, but here I have a doubt whether you are taking the correct set of GLs to do the reconciliation.
    best regds
    Subha

  • Change Customer Reconciliation Account

    I need some assistance in verifying the steps for changing Recon account for a group of customers.
    Scenario.  We have a group of customers (about 60) who have postings to them.  Some of the posting are open and some are cleared.  We need to change the reconciliation account on these customers.  We are running under ECC 6.0
    I know how to change the reconciliation account on the customer.  That is not a problem.  The problem comes with handling the open and cleared items already posted to these customers.
    I believe that at some point in time I need to run trans F101.  In order to run this transaction I need to define an adjustment account using transaction OBBW.  One of my questions here is do I define this as an adjustment account for both the old and the new reconciliation account or for just the old reconciliation account.
    Now most of my questions relate to:
    1.     What are the steps required in order to run F101(FAGLF101 for 6.0)?
    2.     Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
    3.     Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
    4.     Is there anything else (any gotcha’s) that I should be aware of?
    Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
    Greg Brown
    FI/CO Consultant

    the thread you sent me answers part of my questions (namely the fact that I need multiple recon adjustment accounts and the basic steps for executing F101 (FAGLF101).
    However, with regards to my other questions, here is what I am interpreting from the thread.
      1.  Is there something that I will need to do each month or will this be a one time situation only for me?
    <b>Assumed answer:</b>  I will need to run this every month until the balance of the old recon account for the customers in question is zero.
      2. Will/are there any special steps required for clearing the open items once the reconciliation accounts have been changed?
    <b>Assumed answer:</b>  Apparently not.  I will clear the old items (posted but not cleared at the time I changed the recon account) from the old recon account; clear new items (posted and cleared after I change the recon account) for the customer for the new recon account.
    Am I correct on this?
    Any additional help that you can provide me will be greatly appreciated.
    Greg Brown

  • Error in updating OBNK Table ( Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual)

    PLease advise ,
    Bank Statements and Reconciliations,Manual Reconciliation
    Client is receiving the following message:
    Error in updating OBNK Table
    Edited by: Philip Eller on May 20, 2008 9:03 AM

    Hi Darpal Thiarha,
    Please kindly refer to note 1132591 and note 1128677 to see if these are relevant to this issue. Upgrading to  2007A PL15 or above may avoid such issues relevant with the error 'Error in updating OBNK Table'.
    Regards,
    Candice Ren
    SAP Business One Forums Team

  • Reconciliation to verify data in R/3  and BW

    Hi Experts,
    Can any one explain me how we will maintain reconciliation to verify the data in SAP R/3 and SAP BW are same or not after the data loads. Please explain all the sources that we have.
    Thanks in advance
    Mallik

    For Unit Test, you don't need to reconcile all the records. So, I take a couple of selections. Using these, go to RSA3 in R/3 and extract the data and take sub-totals in Excel.
    Now, go to Info Provider in BW, and using same selections, download the data in BW or BEx and take sub-totals again and compare both.
    If the extractor is generic extractor based on View/Tables, you can go one additional step and get data from SE16 in R/3 to make sure RSA3 and Tables also match.
    For Business Content extractor, its a little difficult is do this step because most of them are Function Modules.
    This should be enough as long as your selections are good.
    You can compare the data from RSA3. Run RSA3 and save the data in a file and then compare with BW.
    You can compare the PSA data with R/3 to check whether your data transport is correct.But it’s very much important the end result (with data in Data Targets ex.Infocube...) should be reconciled with the R/3 data to check your update and transfer rules are working fine.
    The second part is too tricky since you cannot directly compare the reports while the formats and grouping are different.
    You can execute the reports in R/3 and apply the Update and transfer conversions (at least for random records) then reconcile with the BW data.
    Take a look on the note: 543188
    "How to Reconcile Data Between SAP Source Systems and SAP NetWeaver BI"
    The Data Reconciliation procedure is still in the SAP action item for the future release.
    But we can reconcile the data by extracting the reports and compare with the query output in Excel sheet.
    Please check for a tool "Excel Compare" in google which is really useful in comparing excel files.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
    By this method you can compare your infocube data with PSA ones...clearly, every changes in R/3 (due to user exit or, above all, BW-specific standard logic) is not taken into account...if you want to consider also this part (back-end), there is no std method and it depends from every specific flow!
    also check in service.sap.com/bi
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/7a5ee147-0501-0010-0a9d-f7abcba36b14
    One way is to define Remote Cube on the R3 data source and create multiprovider on BW with the Remote Cube and the BW target. Subtract the KF on R3 from the KF in BW - anything not 0 becomes an exception.
    Sometimes the source on R3 is not as straight forward and we have had ABAP developers create summary table on R3 to compare to BW.
    Actually one to one Data comparison between R/3 and BW is done during Integration Test phase. During this time we need to sit with R/3 team and work closely because they know exactly the numbers in R/3 side and which tables Data resides and all. After loading Data same data in to BW we compare the numbers between R/3 BW. If both the teams feel there is some data missing then we start the analysis. As a first stem we will see in the extractor’s then BW side during transformation like transfer and update rules.
    Pleases see this document for more help
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/968dab90-0201-0010-c093-9d2a326969f1
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/biw/how%20to%20validate%20infocube%20data%20by%20comparing%20it%20with%20psa%20data
    verifying the data which is coming from R/3 to BW system. That is called as Reconciliation.
    That process is done with “ v lookup “functionality.
    Hope this helps and assihn points, if so
    Regards
    Raja

  • What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?`

    What is difference between Reconciliation Account and Revenue account.?
    Where does it effects after a sales order , delivery doc. or billing doc.?

    Hello Mukesh the comments givan by Amol and Siva kumar are correct.
    Here I am telling you how these accouts arer wrking in sales order and at billing and delivery.
    Our reconsilation account is reconsile with customer that why when you create the sales order you are mentioning the customer at this time reconsiation account works.
    Whenever you doing any posting there is an accounting entry is mae in accounts book right .
    At the time of Delivery and billing both the accounts are affected as per the accounting rule .
    I hpoe this will you help you
    Regards
    ravi

  • RFINDEX - Errors in section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG

    Hi Experts,
    After converting a normal GL account into OIM, we have executed the report RFINDEX for consistency check.
    We have found errors in the section Reconciliation INDEX vs BSEG.
    But I am not sure what exactly the system trying to make me understand and the list of documents that got affected.
    Analysis log says that error msg appears at XBLNR field in BSEG & BSIS table.
    However, we do not find the field in BSEG table.  Then why the system is showing it as "error msg "?
    May I request the forum to throw some light and route me towards solution for overcoming the issue?
    Regards,
    BSK..

    Hi Surya,
    Please note first of all that the repair option in RFINDEX is only available for use SAP Support. We never recommend that customers or general systems users use this report in repair mode themselves. It can lead to further inconsistencies if used incorrectly.
    The error you have seen on this account related to XBLNR is arising because there are differences in the values when comparing the contents of field BKPF-XBLNR and BSIS-XBLNR for a particular set of line items. The XBLNR field is in the header table BKPF and not BSEG.
    This error is usually a non critical error and can occur when customising settings such as user exits, substitutions update the XBLNR field in one table (eg BKPF) but not in another (eg BSIS). In these types of situations we usually advise customers to first take time in understanding why the values are updated for XBLNR in their system; the field is highly customizable and therefore errors like this can often appear in systems when running RFINDEX. There is no bug in the standard system which causes these types of differences.
    The good news is that this error has nothing to do with the open item management which you enabled. Otherwise you would see error messages like "XOPVW" etc. From your description it seems that the conversion to Open Item Management you did was successful.
    Kind regards,
    Declan

  • Trial balance reconciliation a/c mismatch

    hi all
    iam having an error in trial balance in sap
    the trial balance total of vendor reconciliation 13000600 in coming  14943287.90 in total but when iam going to f.42 and take out the total of that particular reconciliation a/c the total is 15003287.9 in vendor balance report there is an excess of 60000 here
    please suggest what could be the problem.
    in which report i can see the bifurcation of 13000600
    Kind regards'
    Aman

    Hi Aman,
    Please check the details of the entries at table level for table LFB1. You can through transaction SE16 for that. There you can find whether any different reconciliation accounts are involved in this.
    Warm regards,
    Murukan Arunachalam

  • Regarding Vendor balance confirmation Report

    Hi Experts
           I have a small issue in FI Module while using standard Programe(SAPF130K).
    If you execute the above program and pass the parameters vendor no and posting date then only get the data.
    But my client requirment is Get the data based on ProfitCenter(PRCTR) and they want only Open Items.
    In standard program used  BSIK and BSAK.
    These two tables Profit Center data is not available.How can i get data based on Profit Center.
    My variant
    Select-Options is
    given below.
    "--Select Options"
    Vendor  1010000001
    CompanyCode 1000
    Reconciliation Key Date   --  current date
    Futhter Selections Check Individual Vendors
    Total Balance
      Check zero Balances
    Keydate For Master Records
    Form Set
            selected for Empty One in F4Help
    Sort Var.for Correspondence       K3
    Line item sorting                 P3
    Date of issue                current date  
    Check No Reply(because not assaigned to Company Code)
    Printer for Form Set           LP01
    Printer for Reconcil. List     LP01
    Printer for results table      LP01
    Printer for selections         LP01
    Regards
    Hari

    HI,
    Kindly use table FAGLFLEXA and FAGLFLEXT for getting profit center data .Assign points if useful.
    Regards,
    Shradha.

Maybe you are looking for