Regular Expressions - Addressbook conversion

Hi Gurus,
I am struggling with the following task. I have an addressbook export in the following format and I need to convert it to use the addresses in Eudora.
I need to do this pretty often. To do away with having to edit the files manually, I am trying to write a Java program using regexp that would take the input file and write out the output file as specified.
Could someone please advise me on the appropriate regular expressions to get this done?
TIA.
Cheers,
Shanzee.
Input address file format
"John","Michael","Kane","[email protected]"
"Barbara","","Potter","[email protected]"
"Richard","","Simpson","[email protected]"
"Graham","T","Laver","graham.t.laver@my_mail.com"
"Beat","","Henderson"
"Technology Service Desk"
Output address file format
alias "John Michael Kane" [email protected]
alias "Barbara Potter" [email protected]
alias "Richard Simpson" [email protected]
alias "Graham T Laver" graham.t.laver@my_mail.com
** delete all rows not having email addresses **

Hi,
I guess you are using JDK 1.4 or later. Look at split
in the String class. And then split your line at ","
Check how many parts you get (to see it the row has an
e-mail address or not), and then write the data to
file.
/KajMany thanks Kaj.
I'm using JDK 1.4.2. I was looking for a 'smarter' solution using RegExp :-) But, nevertheless, if I don't get a good suggestion, I'll go ahead and implement this.
Cheers,
Shanzee.

Similar Messages

Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't forget about the regular expression potential

Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:

<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel$]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\($\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Namburi,
When you said you used the Reg Exp tool, did you use it only as
preconfigured by the iMT migrate application wizard?
Because the default configuration of the regular expression tool will only
target the files in your ND project directories. If you wish to target
classes outside of the normal directory scope, you have to either modify the
"Source Directory" property OR create another instance of the regular
expression tool. See the "Tool" menu in the iMT to create additional tool
instances which can each be configured to target different sets of files
using different sets of rules.
Usually, I utilize 3 different sets of rules files on a given migration:
spider2jato.xml
these are the generic conversion rules (but includes the optimized rules for
ViewBean and Model based code, i.e. these rules do not utilize the
RequestManager since it is not needed for code running inside the ViewBean
or Model classes)
I run these rules against all files.
See the file download section of this forum for periodic updates to these
rules.
nonProjectFileRules.xml
these include rules that add the necessary
RequestManager.getRequestContext(). etc prefixes to many of the common
calls.
I run these rules against user module and any other classes that do not are
not ModuleServlet, ContainerView, or Model classes.
appXRules.xml
these rules include application specific changes that I discover while
working on the project. A common thing here is changing import statements
(since the migration tool moves ND project code into different jato
packaging structure, you sometime need to adjust imports in non-project
classes that previously imported ND project specific packages)
So you see, you are not limited to one set of rules at all. Just be careful
to keep track of your backups (the regexp tool provides several options in
its Expert Properties related to back up strategies).
----- Original Message -----
From: <vnamboori@y...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 6:08 AM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Re: Use Of models in utility classes - Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Thanks Matt, Mike, Todd
This is a great input for our migration. Though we used the existing
Regular Expression Mapping tool, we did not change this to meet our
own needs as mentioned by Mike.
We would certainly incorporate this to ease our migration.
Namburi
--- In iPlanet-JATO@y..., "Todd Fast" <toddwork@c...> wrote:
All--
Great response. By the way, the Regular Expression Tool uses thePerl5 RE
syntax as implemented by Apache OROMatcher. If you're doing lotsof these
sorts of migration changes manually, you should definitely buy theO'Reilly
book "Mastering Regular Expressions" and generate some rules toautomate the
conversion. Although they are definitely confusing at first,regular
expressions are fairly easy to understand with some documentation,and are
superbly effective at tackling this kind of migration task.
Todd
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Frisino" <Michael.Frisino@S...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 5:20 PM
Subject: Re: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes -Pease don't
forget about the regular expression potential
Also, (and Matt's document may mention this)
Please bear in mind that this statement is not totally correct:
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion for
these
utilities we have to do manually.Remember, the iMT is a SUITE of tools. There is the extractiontool, and
the translation tool, and the regular expression tool, and severalother
smaller tools (like the jar and compilation tools). It is correctto state
that the extraction and translation tools only significantlyconvert the
primary ND project objects (the pages, the data objects, and theproject
classes). The extraction and translation tools do minimumtranslation of the
User Module objects (i.e. they repackage the user module classes inthe new
jato module packages). It is correct that for all other utilityclasses
which are not formally part of the ND project, the extraction and
translation tools do not perform any migration.
However, the regular expression tool can "migrate" any arbitrary
file
(utility classes etc) to the degree that the regular expressionrules
correlate to the code present in the arbitrary file. So first andforemost,
if you have alot of spider code in your non-project classes youshould
consider using the regular expression tool and if warranted adding
additional rules to reduce the amount of manual adjustments thatneed to be
made. I can stress this enough. We can even help you write theregular
expression rules if you simply identify the code pattern you wish to
convert. Just because there is not already a regular expressionrule to
match your need does not mean it can't be written. We have notnearly
exhausted the possibilities.
For example if you say, we need to convert
CSpider.getDataObject("X");
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(XModel.class);
Maybe we or somebody else in the list can help write that regularexpression if it has not already been written. For instance in thelast
updated spider2jato.xml file there is already aCSpider.getCommonPage("X")
rule:

<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getPage[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getViewBean($1ViewBean.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
Following this example a getDataObject to getModel would look
like this:
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[CSpider[.\s]*getDataObject[\s]*\(\"([^"]*)\"]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[getModel($1Model.class]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
In fact, one migration developer already wrote that rule andsubmitted it
for inclusion in the basic set. I will post another upgrade to thebasic
regular expression rule set, look for a "file uploaded" posting.Also,
please consider contributing any additional generic rules that youhave
written for inclusion in the basic set.
Please not, that in some cases (Utility classes in particular)
the rule
application may be more effective as TWO sequention rules ratherthan one
monolithic rule. Again using the example above, it will convert
CSpider.getDataObject("Foo");
To
getModel(FooModel.class);
Now that is the most effective conversion for that code if that
code is in
a page or data object class file. But if that code is in a Utilityclass you
really want:
>
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
So to go from
getModel(FooModel.class);
To
RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(FooModel.class
You would apply a second rule AND you would ONLY run this rule
against
your utility classes so that you would not otherwise affect yourViewBean
and Model classes which are completely fine with the simplegetModel call.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getModel$]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getModel\(]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getRequestContext().getModelManager().getModel(]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
A similer rule can be applied to getSession and other CSpider APIcalls.
For instance here is the rule for converting getSession calls toleverage
the RequestManager.
<mapping-rule>
<mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<![CDATA[getSession\($\.]]>
</mapping-rule-primarymatch>
<mapping-rule-replacement>
<mapping-rule-match>
<![CDATA[getSession\.]]>
</mapping-rule-match>
<mapping-rule-substitute>
<![CDATA[RequestManager.getSession().]]>
</mapping-rule-substitute>
</mapping-rule-replacement>
</mapping-rule>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Stevens" <matthew.stevens@e...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: RE: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Namburi,
I will post a document to the group site this evening which has
the
details
on various tactics of migrating these type of utilities.
Essentially,
you
either need to convert these utilities to Models themselves or
keep the
utilities as is and simply use the
RequestManager.getRequestContext.getModelManager().getModel()
to statically access Models.
For CSpSelect.executeImmediate() I have an example of customhelper
method
as a replacement whicch uses JDBC results instead of
CSpDBResult.
matt
-----Original Message-----
From: vnamboori@y... [mailto:<a href="/group/SunONE-JATO/post?protectID=081071113213093190112061186248100208071048">vnamboori@y...</a>]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2001 3:24 PM
Subject: [iPlanet-JATO] Use Of models in utility classes
Hi All,
In the present ND project we have lots of utility classes.
These
classes in diffrent directory. Not part of nd pages.
In these classes we access the dataobjects and do themanipulations.
So we access dataobjects directly like
CSpider.getDataObject("do....");
and then execute it.
Since the migration tool does not do much of conversion forthese
utilities we have to do manually.
My question is Can we access the the models in the postmigration
sameway or do we need requestContext?
We have lots of utility classes which are DataObjectintensive. Can
someone suggest a better way to migrate this kind of code.
Thanks
Namburi
[email protected]
[email protected]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Introduction to regular expressions ... last part.

Continued from Introduction to regular expressions ... continued., here's the third and final part of my introduction to regular expressions. As always, if you find mistakes or have examples that you think could be solved through regular expressions, please post them.
Having fun with regular expressions - Part 3
In some cases, I may have to search for different values in the same column. If the searched values are fixed, I can use the logical OR operator or the IN clause, like in this example (using my brute force data generator from part 2):
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE data IN ('abc', 'xyz', '012');There are of course some workarounds as presented in this asktom thread but for a quick solution, there's of course an alternative approach available. Remember the "|" pipe symbol as OR operator inside regular expressions? Take a look at this:
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data, '^(abc|xyz|012)$')
;I can even use strings composed of values like 'abc, xyz , 012' by simply using another regular expression to replace "," and spaces with the "|" pipe symbol. After reading part 1 and 2 that shouldn't be too hard, right? Here's my "thinking in regular expression": Replace every "," and 0 or more leading/trailing spaces.
Ready to try your own solution?
Does it look like this?
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data, '^(' || REGEXP_REPLACE('abc, xyz , 012', ' *, *', '|') || ')$')
;If I wouldn't use the "^" and "$" metacharacter, this SELECT would search for any occurence inside the data column, which could be useful if I wanted to combine LIKE and IN clause. Take a look at this example where I'm looking for 'abc%', 'xyz%' or '012%' and adding a case insensitive match parameter to it:
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data, '^(abc|xyz|012)', 'i')
; An equivalent non regular expression solution would have to look like this, not mentioning other options with adding an extra "," and using the INSTR function:
SELECT data
FROM (SELECT data, LOWER(DATA) search
          FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE search LIKE 'abc%'
    OR search LIKE 'xyz%'
    OR search LIKE '012%'
SELECT data
FROM (SELECT data, SUBSTR(LOWER(DATA), 1, 3) search
          FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('abcxyz012', 4))
WHERE search IN ('abc', 'xyz', '012')
; I'll leave it to your imagination how a complete non regular example with 'abc, xyz , 012' as search condition would look like.
As mentioned in the first part, regular expressions are not very good at formatting, except for some selected examples, such as phone numbers, which in my demonstration, have different formats. Using regular expressions, I can change them to a uniform representation:
WITH t AS (SELECT '123-4567' phone
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '01 345678'
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '7 87 8787'
             FROM dual
SELECT t.phone, REGEXP_REPLACE(REGEXP_REPLACE(phone, '[^0-9]'), '(.{3})(.*)', '(\1)-\2')
FROM t
;First, all non digit characters are beeing filtered, afterwards the remaining string is put into a "(xxx)-xxxx" format, but not cutting off any phone numbers that have more than 7 digits. Using such a conversion could also be used to check the validity of entered data, and updating the value with a uniform format afterwards.
Thinking about it, why not use regular expressions to check other values about their formats? How about an IP4 address? I'll do this step by step, using 127.0.0.1 as the final test case.
First I want to make sure, that each of the 4 parts of an IP address remains in the range between 0-255. Regular expressions are good at string matching but they don't allow any numeric comparisons. What valid strings do I have to take into consideration?
Single digit values: 0-9
Double digit values: 00-99
Triple digit values: 000-199, 200-255 (this one will be the trickiest part)
So far, I will have to use the "|" pipe operator to match all of the allowed combinations. I'll use my brute force generator to check if my solution works for a single value:
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('0123456789', 3))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data, '^(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9]{1,2})$')
; More than 255 records? Leading zeros are allowed, but checking on all the records, there's no value above 255. First step accomplished. The second part is to make sure, that there are 4 such values, delimited by a "." dot. So I have to check for 0-255 plus a dot 3 times and then check for another 0-255 value. Doesn't sound to complicated, does it?
Using first my brute force generator, I'll check if I've missed any possible combination:
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('03.', 15))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data,
                   '^((25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9]{1,2})\.){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9]{1,2})$'
; Looks good to me. Let's check on some sample data:
WITH t AS (SELECT '127.0.0.1' ip
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT '256.128.64.32'
             FROM dual
SELECT t.ip
FROM t WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(t.ip,
                   '^((25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9]{1,2})\.){3}(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9]{1,2})$'
; No surprises here. I can take this example a bit further and try to format valid addresses to a uniform representation, as shown in the phone number example. My goal is to display every ip address in the "xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" format, using leading zeros for 2 and 1 digit values.
Regular expressions don't have any format models like for example the TO_CHAR function, so how could this be achieved? Thinking in regular expressions, I first have to find a way to make sure, that each single number is at least three digits wide. Using my example, this could look like this:
WITH t AS (SELECT '127.0.0.1' ip
             FROM dual
SELECT t.ip, REGEXP_REPLACE(t.ip, '([0-9]+)(\.?)', '00\1\2')
FROM t
; Look at this: leading zeros. However, that first value "00127" doesn't look to good, does it? If you thought about using a second regular expression function to remove any excess zeros, you're absolutely right. Just take the past examples and think in regular expressions. Did you come up with something like this?
WITH t AS (SELECT '127.0.0.1' ip
             FROM dual
SELECT t.ip, REGEXP_REPLACE(REGEXP_REPLACE(t.ip, '([0-9]+)(\.?)', '00\1\2'),
                            '[0-9]*([0-9]{3})(\.?)', '\1\2'
FROM t
; Think about the possibilities: Now you can sort a table with unformatted IP addresses, if that is a requirement in your application or you find other values where you can use that "trick".
Since I'm on checking INET (internet) type of values, let's do some more, for example an e-mail address. I'll keep it simple and will only check on the
"[email protected]", "[email protected]" and "[email protected]" format, where x represents an alphanumeric character. If you want, you can look up the corresponding RFC definition and try to build your own regular expression for that one.
Now back to this one: At least one alphanumeric character followed by an "@" at sign which is followed by at least one alphanumeric character followed by a "." dot and exactly 3 more alphanumeric characters or 2 more characters followed by a "." dot and another 2 characters. This should be an easy one, right? Use some sample e-mail addresses and my brute force generator, you should be able to verify your solution.
Here's mine:
SELECT data
FROM TABLE(regex_utils.gen_data('a1@.', 9))
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(data, '^[[:alnum:]]+@[[:alnum:]]+(\.[[:alnum:]]{3,4}|(\.[[:alnum:]]{2}){2})$', 'i'); Checking on valid domains, in my opinion, should be done in a second function, to keep the checks by itself simple, but that's probably a discussion about readability and taste.
How about checking a valid URL? I can reuse some parts of the e-mail example and only have to decide what type of URLs I want, for example "http://", "https://" and "ftp://", any subdomain and a "/" after the domain. Using the case insensitive match parameter, this shouldn't take too long, and I can use this thread's URL as a test value. But take a minute to figure that one out for yourself.
Does it look like this?
WITH t AS (SELECT 'Introduction to regular expressions ... last part. URL
             FROM dual
            UNION
           SELECT 'http://x/'
             FROM dual
SELECT t.URL
FROM t
WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(t.URL, '^(https*|ftp)://(.+\.)*[[:alnum:]]+(\.[[:alnum:]]{3,4}|(\.[[:alnum:]]{2}){2})/', 'i')
Update: Improvements in 10g2
All of you, who are using 10g2 or XE (which includes some of 10g2 features) may want to take a look at several improvements in this version. First of all, there are new, perl influenced meta characters.
Rewriting my example from the first lesson, the WHERE clause would look like this:
WHERE NOT REGEXP_LIKE(t.col1, '^\d+$')Or my example with searching decimal numbers:
'^(\.\d+|\d+(\.\d*)?)$'Saves some space, doesn't it? However, this will only work in 10g2 and future releases.
Some of those meta characters even include non matching lists, for example "\S" is equivalent to "[^ ]", so my example in the second part could be changed to:
SELECT NVL(LENGTH(REGEXP_REPLACE('Having fun with regular expressions', '\S')), 0)
FROM dual
;Other meta characters support search patterns in strings with newline characters. Just take a look at the link I've included.
Another interesting meta character is "?" non-greedy. In 10g2, "?" not only means 0 or 1 occurrence, it means also the first occurrence. Let me illustrate with a simple example:
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR('Having fun with regular expressions', '^.* +')
FROM dual
;This is old style, "greedy" search pattern, returning everything until the last space.
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR('Having fun with regular expressions', '^.* +?')
FROM dual
;In 10g2, you'd get only "Having " because of the non-greedy search operation. Simulating that behavior in 10g1, I'd have to change the pattern to this:
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR('Having fun with regular expressions', '^[^ ]+ +')
FROM dual
;Another new option is the "x" match parameter. It's purpose is to ignore whitespaces in the searched string. This would prove useful in ignoring trailing/leading spaces for example. Checking on unsigned integers with leading/trailing spaces would look like this:
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR(' 123 ', '^[0-9]+$', 1, 1, 'x')
FROM dual
;However, I've to be careful. "x" would also allow " 1 2 3 " to qualify as valid string.
I hope you enjoyed reading this introduction and hope you'll have some fun with using regular expressions.
C.
Fixed some typos ...
Message was edited by:
cd
Included 10g2 features
Message was edited by:
cd

Can I write this condition with only one reg expr in Oracle (regexp_substr in my example)?I meant to use only regexp_substr in select clause and without regexp_like in where clause.
but for better understanding what I'd like to get
next example:
a have strings of two blocks separated by space.
in the first block 5 symbols of [01] in the second block 3 symbols of [01].
In the first block it is optional to meet one (!), in the second block it is optional to meet one (>).
The idea is to find such strings with only one reg expr using regexp_substr in the select clause, so if the string does not satisfy requirments should be passed out null in the result set.
with t as (select '10(!)010 10(>)1' num from dual union all
select '1112(!)0 111' from dual union all --incorrect because of '2'
select '(!)10010 011' from dual union all
select '10010(!) 101' from dual union all
select '10010 100(>)' from dual union all
select '13001 110' from dual union all -- incorrect because of '3'
select '100!01 100' from dual union all --incorrect because of ! without (!)
select '100(!)1(!)1 101' from dual union all -- incorrect because of two occurencies of (!)
select '1001(!)10 101' from dual union all --incorrect because of length of block1=6
select '1001(!)10 1011' from dual union all) --incorrect because of length of block2=4
select '10110 1(>)11(>)0' from dual union all)--incorrect because of two occurencies of (>)
select '1001(>)1 11(!)0' from dual)--incorrect because (!) and (>) are met not in their blocks
--end of test data

Regular Expressions on strings

How would I go about creating a regular expression in LabVIEW that, say, takes an input of a list of numbers (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) and turns it into an array with the elements [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]? If someone could show me example code, I would be quite grateful.
Thanks.
Using LabVIEW 2009 on Windows Vista

Spreadsheet String to Array should work for conversion to strings or numbers...
Richard
Attachments:
stringarr.gif ‏18 KB

? on Regular Expressions

I am trying to use a regular expression to spot an empty string but it isn't working within Oracle ... regexp_like(:P13_ADDRESS,'^$')
Shouldn't this expression work '^$' ???????

Justin,
a few Oracle facts regarding the handling of null values:
1) the empty string '' is equivalent to NULL
2) an operation (using oracle built-in operators / functions) on a NULL value will always result in a null value
consider the following example for illustration purposes:
set serveroutput on
DECLARE
   l_str   VARCHAR2 (100);
BEGIN
   l_str := '';
   IF l_str IS NULL THEN
      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('empty string is null');
   END IF;
   IF TO_NUMBER ('') IS NULL THEN
      DBMS_OUTPUT.put_line ('conversions on null will yield null as output');
   END IF;
END;
That's what it seems to be doing, as my example showed. I don't quite agree with this,
NULL is a RDBMS concept, it should match a empty string (^$), but Oracle's regexp
implementation doesn't seem to be doing this, so just NVL it.Well, regarding the logic behind (2), that all operations on a null value will result in a null value, it does indeed make sense that the regular expression applied to null returns null.
And in a boolean context (like in the if-clause) null will be equivalent to false. This can be tricky at times!
Thus I would use the following code (illustrated by a stored function) to check for an empty string
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION is_empty (p_str IN VARCHAR2)
   RETURN BOOLEAN IS
   l_str   VARCHAR2 (2000) := TRIM (p_str); -- remove leading and trailing spaces
BEGIN
   IF l_str IS NULL THEN
      RETURN TRUE;
   ELSE
      RETURN FALSE;
   END IF;
END;
/~Dietmar.

Logical AND in Java Regular Expressions

I'm trying to implement logical AND using Java Regular Expressions.
I couldn't figure out how to do it after reading Java docs and textbooks. I can do something like "abc.*def", which means that I'm looking for strings which have "abc", then anything, then "def", but it is not "pure" logical AND - I will not find "def.*abc" this way.
Any ideas, how to do it ?
Baken

First off, looks like you're really talking about an "OR", not an "AND" - you want it to match abc.*def OR def.*abc right? If you tried to match abc.*def AND def.*abc nothing would ever match that, as no string can begin with both "abc" and "def", just like no numeric value can be both 2 and 5.
Anyway, maybe regex isn't the right tool for this job. Can you not simply programmatically match it yourself using String methods? You want it to match if the string "starts with" abc and "ends with" def, or vice-versa. Just write some simple code.

Help in Regular expression

Hello..
I wanted to write a regular expression to match the foll string..
 
 NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) 
-- Two years after Hurricane Katrina devastated coastal areas of Louisiana and Mississippi, residents say much of America has forgotten their plight.
 
I tried doing..
Matcher matcher= Pattern.compile(" ([^<^>]+?)", Pattern.CASE_INSENSITIVE).matcher(story);
Its not working...
is there any other soln?

Theres probably a better way to do this but here's a way that works.
import java.util.regex.*;
public class RegexTester{
public static void main(String[] args){
 String text =
 " " +
 " NEW ORLEANS, Louisiana (CNN) " +
 "-- Two years after Hurricane Katrina devastated coastal areas of Louisiana and Mississippi," +
 "residents say much of America has forgotten their plight." +
 " ";
 String regex = ">((?:\\s*[\\S&&[^<>]]+\\s*)*?)<";
 Pattern p = Pattern.compile(regex);
 Matcher m = p.matcher(text);
 while(m.find()){
 System.out.println("Match: '" + m.group(1) + "'");
}

Help in regular expression matching

I have three expressions like
1) [(y2009)(y2011)]
2) [(y2008M5)(y2011M3)] or [(y2009M5)(y2010M12)]
3) [(y2009M1d20)(y2011M12d31)]
i want regular expression pattern for the above three expressions
I am using :
REGEXP_LIKE(timedomainexpression, '???[:digit:]{4}*[:digit:]{1,2}???[:digit:]{4}*[:digit:]{1,2}??', 'i');
but its giving results for all above expressions while i want different expression for each.
i hav used * after [:digit:]{4}, when i am using ? or . then its giving no results. Please help in this situation ASAP.
Thanks

I dont get your question Can you post your desired output? and also give some sample data.
Please consider the following when you post a question.
1. New features keep coming in every oracle version so please provide Your Oracle DB Version to get the best possible answer.
You can use the following query and do a copy past of the output.
select * from v$version 2. This forum has a very good Search Feature. Please use that before posting your question. Because for most of the questions
that are asked the answer is already there.
3. We dont know your DB structure or How your Data is. So you need to let us know. The best way would be to give some sample data like this.
I have the following table called sales
with sales
as
 select 1 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1001 inv_num, 120 qty from dual
 union all
 select 2 sales_id, 1 prod_id, 1002 inv_num, 25 qty from dual
select *
from sales 4. Rather than telling what you want in words its more easier when you give your expected output.
For example in the above sales table, I want to know the total quantity and number of invoice for each product.
The output should look like this
Prod_id sum_qty count_inv
1 145 2 5. When ever you get an error message post the entire error message. With the Error Number, The message and the Line number.
6. Next thing is a very important thing to remember. Please post only well formatted code. Unformatted code is very hard to read.
Your code format gets lost when you post it in the Oracle Forum. So in order to preserve it you need to
use the {noformat}{noformat} tags.
The usage of the tag is like this.
<place your code here>\
7. If you are posting a *Performance Related Question*. Please read
 {thread:id=501834} and {thread:id=863295}.
 Following those guide will be very helpful.
8. Please keep in mind that this is a public forum. Here No question is URGENT.
 So use of words like *URGENT* or *ASAP* (As Soon As Possible) are considered to be rude.

Regular expression alphabets

Hi
I want to retrieve the data if the data contains a character or a space or '-' thru select query .
Please help me in writing the combination of 3 with regular expression.
Thanks!!

VT wrote:
Hi,
Try this
SELECT *
FROM <TABLE> WHERE REGEXP_LIKE(<COLUMN>, '[a-z -][A-Z -]');cheers
VTThat won't work as it's expecting at least two characters with the first having to be a-z (lower case) or space or "-" followed by A-Z (upper case) or space or "-".
The correct way is either:
[a-zA-Z -]or
[[:alpha:] -]using the alpha set is often preferable as it can work differently with different character sets/languages rather than restricting to just the a-zA-Z ranges.
Generating a reference for your own database characterset/language can be useful...
SQL> select level-1 as asc_code, decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:print:]]'), CHR(level-1)) as chr,
2 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:graph:]]'), 1) is_graph,
3 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:blank:]]'), 1) is_blank,
4 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:alnum:]]'), 1) is_alnum,
5 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:alpha:]]'), 1) is_alpha,
6 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:digit:]]'), 1) is_digit,
7 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:cntrl:]]'), 1) is_cntrl,
8 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:lower:]]'), 1) is_lower,
9 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:upper:]]'), 1) is_upper,
10 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:print:]]'), 1) is_print,
11 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:punct:]]'), 1) is_punct,
12 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:space:]]'), 1) is_space,
13 decode(chr(level-1), regexp_substr(chr(level-1), '[[:xdigit:]]'), 1) is_xdigit
14 from dual
15 connect by level <= 256
16 /
ASC_CODE C IS_GRAPH IS_BLANK IS_ALNUM IS_ALPHA IS_DIGIT IS_CNTRL IS_LOWER IS_UPPER IS_PRINT IS_PUNCT IS_SPACE IS_XDIGIT
 0 1
 1 1
 2 1
 3 1
 4 1
 5 1
 6 1
 7 1
 8 1
 9 1 1
 10 1 1
 11 1 1
 12 1 1
 13 1 1
 14 1
 15 1
 16 1
 17 1
 18 1
 19 1
 20 1
 21 1
 22 1
 23 1
 24 1
 25 1
 26 1
 27 1
 28 1
 29 1
 30 1
 31 1
 32 1 1 1
 33 ! 1 1 1
 34 " 1 1 1
 35 # 1 1 1
 36 $ 1 1 1
 37 % 1 1 1
 38 & 1 1 1
 39 ' 1 1 1
 40 ( 1 1 1
 41 ) 1 1 1
 42 * 1 1 1
 43 + 1 1 1
 44 , 1 1 1
 45 - 1 1 1
 46 . 1 1 1
 47 / 1 1 1
 48 0 1 1 1 1 1
 49 1 1 1 1 1 1
 50 2 1 1 1 1 1
 51 3 1 1 1 1 1
 52 4 1 1 1 1 1
 53 5 1 1 1 1 1
 54 6 1 1 1 1 1
 55 7 1 1 1 1 1
 56 8 1 1 1 1 1
 57 9 1 1 1 1 1
 58 : 1 1 1
 59 ; 1 1 1
 60 < 1 1 1
 61 = 1 1 1
 62 > 1 1 1
 63 ? 1 1 1
 64 @ 1 1 1
 65 A 1 1 1 1 1 1
 66 B 1 1 1 1 1 1
 67 C 1 1 1 1 1 1
 68 D 1 1 1 1 1 1
 69 E 1 1 1 1 1 1
 70 F 1 1 1 1 1 1
 71 G 1 1 1 1 1
 72 H 1 1 1 1 1
 73 I 1 1 1 1 1
 74 J 1 1 1 1 1
 75 K 1 1 1 1 1
 76 L 1 1 1 1 1
 77 M 1 1 1 1 1
 78 N 1 1 1 1 1
 79 O 1 1 1 1 1
 80 P 1 1 1 1 1
 81 Q 1 1 1 1 1
 82 R 1 1 1 1 1
 83 S 1 1 1 1 1
 84 T 1 1 1 1 1
 85 U 1 1 1 1 1
 86 V 1 1 1 1 1
 87 W 1 1 1 1 1
 88 X 1 1 1 1 1
 89 Y 1 1 1 1 1
 90 Z 1 1 1 1 1
 91 [ 1 1 1
 92 \ 1 1 1
 93 ] 1 1 1
 94 ^ 1 1 1
 95 _ 1 1 1
 96 ` 1 1 1
 97 a 1 1 1 1 1 1
 98 b 1 1 1 1 1 1
 99 c 1 1 1 1 1 1
 100 d 1 1 1 1 1 1
 101 e 1 1 1 1 1 1
 102 f 1 1 1 1 1 1
 103 g 1 1 1 1 1
 104 h 1 1 1 1 1
 105 i 1 1 1 1 1
 106 j 1 1 1 1 1
 107 k 1 1 1 1 1
 108 l 1 1 1 1 1
 109 m 1 1 1 1 1
 110 n 1 1 1 1 1
 111 o 1 1 1 1 1
 112 p 1 1 1 1 1
 113 q 1 1 1 1 1
 114 r 1 1 1 1 1
 115 s 1 1 1 1 1
 116 t 1 1 1 1 1
 117 u 1 1 1 1 1
 118 v 1 1 1 1 1
 119 w 1 1 1 1 1
 120 x 1 1 1 1 1
 121 y 1 1 1 1 1
 122 z 1 1 1 1 1
 123 { 1 1 1
 124 | 1 1 1
 125 } 1 1 1
 126 ~ 1 1 1
 127 1
 128 Ç 1 1 1
etc.
{code}

Help in query using regular expression

HI,
I need a help to get the below output using regular expression query. Please help me.
SELECT REGEXP_SUBSTR ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)', '[^+]+', 1, lvl) val, lvl
FROM DUAL,(SELECT LEVEL lvl FROM DUAL
CONNECT BY LEVEL <=(SELECT MAX ( LENGTH ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)') - LENGTH (REPLACE ('PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)','+',NULL))+ 1) FROM DUAL));
I need the output as
correct result:
==============
val lvl
P/W 1
P/L 2
CC 3
But i tried the above it is not coming the above result. Please help me where i did a mistake.
Thanks in advance

Frank gave you a solution in your other thread. You could simplify it if you are on 11g:
SQL> select * from table_x
2 /
TXT
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR)
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC)
select txt,
 regexp_substr(
 txt,
 '(.*\()*([^+)]+)',
 1,
 column_value,
 null,
 2
 ) element,
 column_value element_number
from table_x,
 table(
 cast(
 multiset(
 select level
 from dual
 connect by level <= regexp_count(txt,'\+') + 1
 as sys.OdciNumberList
order by rowid,
 column_value
TXT ELEMENT ELEMENT_NUMBER
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR) INTELLI CC 1
TECHPKG(INTELLI CC+FRT SONAR) FRT SONAR 2
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC) P/W 1
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC) P/L 2
PWRPKG(P/W+P/L+CC) CC 3
SQL> SY.

Query help in regular expression

Hi all,
SELECT * FROM emp11
WHERE INSTR(ENAME,'A',1,2) >0;
Please let me know the equivalent query using regular expressions.
i have tried this after going through oracle regular expressions documentation.
SELECT * FROM emp11
WHERE regexp_LIKE(ename,'A{2}')
Any help in this regard would be highly appreciated .
Thanks,
P Prakash

please go here
Introduction to regular expressions ...
Thanks,
P Prakash

Urgent!!! Problem in regular expression for matching braces

Hi,
For the example below, can I write a regular expression to store getting key, value pairs.
example: ((abc def) (ghi jkl) (a ((b c) (d e))) (mno pqr) (a ((abc def))))
in the above example
abc is key & def is value
ghi is key & jkl is value
a is key & ((b c) (d e)) is value
and so on.
can anybody pls help me in resolving this problem using regular expressions...
Thanks in advance

"((key1 value1) (key2 value2) (key3 ((key4 value4)
(key5 value5))) (key6 value6) (key7 ((key8 value8)
(key9 value9))))"
I want to write a regular expression in java to parse
the above string and store the result in hash table
as below
key1 value1
key2 value2
key3 ((key4 value4) (key5 value5))
key4 value4
key5 value5
key6 value6
key7 ((key8 value8) (key9 value9))
key8 value8
key9 value9
please let me know, if it is not possible with
regular expressions the effective way of solving itYes, it is possible with a recursive regular expression.
Unfortunately Java does not provide a recursive regular expression construct.
$_ = "((key1 value1) (key2 value2) (key3 ((key4 value4) (key5 value5))) (key6 value6) (key7 ((key8 value8) (key9 value9))))";
my $paren;
   $paren = qr/
           [^()]+ # Not parens
         |
           (??{ $paren }) # Another balanced group (not interpolated yet)
    /x;
my $r = qr/^(.*?)$(\w+?) (\w+?|(??{$paren}))$\s*(.*?)$/;
while ($_) {
     match()
# operates on $_
sub match {
     my @v;
     @v = m/$r/;
     if (defined $v[3]) {
          $_ = $v[2];
          while (/\(/) {
               match();
          print "\"",$v[1],"\" \"",$v[2],"\"";
          $_ = $v[0].$v[3];
     else { $_ = ""; }
C:\usr\schodtt\src\java\forum\n00b\regex>perl recurse.pl
"key1" "value1"
"key2" "value2"
"key4" "value4"
"key5" "value5"
"key3" "((key4 value4) (key5 value5))"
"key6" "value6"
"key8" "value8"
"key9" "value9"
"key7" "((key8 value8) (key9 value9))"
C:\usr\schodtt\src\java\forum\n00b\regex>

Bracket in Regular Expression constant?

I am a bit puzzled by the behavior I am experiencing in LV 2011. I hope to get some light from experts out there.
I am trying to parse a messy ASCII header file and after having split it into individual lines (strings), I use the "Match Regular Expression" function to remove some of the info before the substantial information.
Some of the strings include square brackets ([, ]), which are special characters for the function, therefore, as documented in the help, one needs to precede them with a backslash.
Example:
I want to parse the following line:
#PR [PR_DEV,I,2]
One way (which I am using because of considerations related to the rest of the header) is the the following:
Note that the first string constant is using "Code Display" whereas the second one is using "Normal Display".
Why did I not put a backslash in front of the bracket in the first string, you may ask? Well, I did, but it disappeared after I typed the other characters. And reverting to "Normal Display" did not restore it.
Of course, the first version does not parse the input string correctly, whereas the second one does it fine.
In other words, the custom display string (which is convenient for cryptic codes such as \s* or to distinguish between space and tab...or simply ENTER tabs!) seems to mess up with the \[ combo (likewise with the \] one).
It is not a huge deal. I can use the "Normal Display" mode, but I tend to think that this qualifies as a hidden "feature". And again, it is still a pain in the ... when dealing with special characters such as tabs, etc...
Solved!
Go to Solution.

I think that [ is a special character which needs to be preceded by a backslash, but it is not one of the defined backslash characters (like \s). So, you need to put in two \\ to get one \ while in '\' Codes Display.
You can put in any character by using \xx where the xx is a hex character using only upper case letters for A..F. I converted the strings to byte arrays and tried to see what made the arrays match and the Match work.
Lynn

Need help with regular expression

I'm trying to use the java.util.regex package to extract URLs from html files.
The URLs that I am interested in extracting from the HTML look like the following:
http://forum.java.sun.com -
So, the URL is always preceeded by:

and then followed by a space character and then a hyphen character. I want to be able to put all these URLs in a Vector object. This doesn't seem like it should be too difficult but for some reason I can't get anywhere with it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

hi gupta am not sure of the java syntax but i can tell u about the regular expression...try this....
(http:\/\/[a-zA-Z0-9.]+) [-]
i dont know the java methods to call...just the reg exp...
Sanjay Acharya

Litte help with regular expression?

Greetings all,
I have a simple regular expression "(\\w+)\\s(\\w+)\\s(.+)"
Which I want to match against the strings like "Acetobacter pasteurianus LMD22.1"
But this always fails whenever there is a dot (.) character like "LMD22.1" in above string.
How to solve this ?
Thanks in advance.

Shouldn't that be Acinetobacter?
edit: nope, I'm wrong, you're right.
Edited by: Encephalopathic on Apr 7, 2009 7:34 PM

Regular Expressions - Addressbook conversion

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for