Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object Tracking

Can someone confirm if Reliable Static Routing Using Object Tracking is supported on the Cisco 3850 switch running IOS-XE? If so, does it require IP Services licensing or will IP Base suffice?
If it is not supported on the 3850, what about the 3750X running IOS? Again, would it require IP Services licensing?

Hello
CCO seems to suggest it does
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/xe-3se/3850/iap-xe-3se-3850-book.pdf#page21
Res
Paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Similar Messages

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Floating static routes

if a rip enabled primary interface goes down and is backed up by a dialer 1 Floating static route with an admin distance of e.g 200 can a second Dialer 2 be configured to connect to the same location via a second floating static route e.g admin cost 240. In the event of Dialer 1 not connecting.

Hi Larry,
I've given this a bit of thought and believe that you can possibly get this going using the feature 'Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object Tracking'. There's some info and examples regarding this here:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios123/123newft/123limit/123x/123xe/dbackupx.htm#wp1071672
Essentially, you would use the 'track' keyword with the 'ip route' statement for the floating static route for your first dialer. The static route would only be installed if you had actual connectivity over this dialer. If your dialer does not come up, the track object will change status to down and bring down that floating static route, enabling your third static default route to kick in.
I have not tried this personally but the approack makes sense...
Hope that helps - pls rate the post if it does.
Regards,
Paresh

Static Classes/Methods vs Objects/Instance Classes/Methods?

Hi,
I am reading "Official ABAP Programming Guidelines" book. And I saw the rule:
Rule 5.3: Do Not Use Static Classes
Preferably use objects instead of static classes. If you don't want to have a multiple instantiation, you can use singletons.
I needed to create a global class and some methods under that. And there is no any object-oriented design idea exists. Instead of creating a function group/modules, I have decided to create a global class (even is a abstract class) and some static methods.So I directly use these static methods by using zcl_class=>method().
But the rule above says "Don't use static classes/methods, always use instance methods if even there is no object-oriented design".
The book listed several reasons, one for example
1-) Static classes are implicitly loaded first time they are used, and the corresponding static constructor -of available- is executed. They remain in the memory as long as the current internal session exists. Therefore, if you use static classes, you cannot actually control the time of initialization and have no option to release the memory.
So if I use a static class/method in a subroutine, it will be loaded into memory and it will stay in the memory till I close the program.
But if I use instance class/method, I can CREATE OBJECT lo_object TYPE REF TO zcl_class then use method lo_object->method(), then I can FREE lo_object to delete from the memory. Is my understanding correct?
Any idea? What do you prefer Static Class OR Object/Instance Class?
Thanks in advance.
Tuncay

@Naimesh Patel
So you recommend to use instance class/methods even though method logic is just self-executable. Right?
<h3>Example:</h3>
<h4>Instance option</h4>
CLASS zcl_class DEFINITION.
METHODS add_1 IMPORTING i_input type i EXPORTING e_output type i.
METHODS subtract_1 IMPORTING i_input type i EXPORTING e_output type i.
ENDCLASS
CLASS zcl_class IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD add_1.
    e_output = i_input + 1.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD subtract_1.
    e_output = i_input - 1.
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS
CREATE OBJECT lo_object.
lo_object->add_1(
exporting i_input = 1
importing e_output = lv_output ).
lo_object->subtract_1(
exporting i_input = 2
importing e_output = lv_output2 ).
<h4>Static option</h4>
CLASS zcl_class DEFINITION.
CLASS-METHODS add_1 IMPORTING i_input type i EXPORTING e_output type i.
CLASS-METHODS subtract_1 IMPORTING i_input type i EXPORTING e_output type i.
ENDCLASS
CLASS zcl_class IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD add_1.
    e_output = i_input + 1.
ENDMETHOD.
METHOD subtract_1.
    e_output = i_input - 1.
ENDMETHOD.
ENDCLASS
CREATE OBJECT lo_object.
lo_object->add_1(
zcl_class=>add_1(
exporting i_input = 1
importing e_output = lv_output ).
lo_object->subtract_1(
zcl_class=>subtract_1(
exporting i_input = 2
importing e_output = lv_output2 ).
So which option is best? Pros and Cons?

Configuring Static Route Tracking Using ASDM 7.1(3) ASA 9.1(2)

I have recently updated my ASA5520 to 9.1(2) and I am using ASDM 7.1(3) to configure Static Route Tracking. I have done this previoussy in earlier version of ASDM without a problem. There seems to be a new field in the Tracked Options section. What is the "Target Interface"? Is it the interface I want to use as the standby route when the Monitor fails? Or is it the Interface that is doing the monitoring?
I have looked through Cisco ASA Series General Operations ASDM Configuration Guide Software Version 7.1, as well as older ASDM books and this field is never listed or described.

Hi,
The target interface will be the interface through which you will be polling some destination IP address with ICMP Echos to determine if the route through that interface is still valid.
So in your case you would use "Outside"
Heres the link to the ASA Command Reference listing the above "type" command under the "sla monitor 1" configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/command-reference/t2.html#wp1568359
- Jouni

Object tracking in Policy BAsed Routing

Does anyone out there know if it is possible to track an object's availability (as part of a routing policy) but to specify the TTL of the ping packet used to track that object's availability?
I am trying to prefer one route over another for specific traffic and want to monitor the IP address of a remote end of an attached L3 link BUT there is also another route to the remote end meaning that the ipEcho monitor will always get a response even if the preferred route is down making it useless in failing over to the route in the routing table in the event the preferred link is lost.
NB - Using a preferred egress interface as part of the policy cannot be used in this particular case.
Any help or alternative ways to achieve the same aim gratefully received. Cheers

Hi,
How would specifying the TTL of SLA ping force the ping test on primary path?
Is it because the destination is less hops away on the primary path than on the secondary ?
You could do a local policy that sends the pings to the primary path next-hop or do a static host route for ping destination that goes over the primary path.
Regards
Alain
Don't forget to rate helpful posts.

In A Perfect World - Using Static Routes In RRAS 2012 To Traverse Sites

I have site-to-site VPN tunnels between my main sites
NYC <--> UK
NYC <----> SANFRAN
NYC <----> BOSTON
NYC <----> MALTA
UK <----> SANFRAN
UK <----> BOSTON
And could see ALL sites when I had my DA/RRAS server using one of the existing subnets (for example, when I used US VPN on NYC DHCP (192.168.2.x) I was able to see EVERYTHING on any site we had a site-to-site VPN with (i.e. from VPN client I could access
MALTA, UK, SANFRAN, BOSTON).
Alas I had to change that to a different subnet (192.168.145.x) and now only see the 192.168.2.x network in NYC.
Is there a way to add static routes on the NYC & UK DA/RRAS servers so this access is restored? Or would this be solved at the Layer 2/3 network level?
Michael P. O'Hara

No, you need to allow forwarding of broadcast packet, but it's really against the best-practice, as you can kill easilly your satellite link.
I agree with you for wins, as I personnaly does not use it and try to remove it when I see someone use it, but it's the only solution for what you want (network discovery over LAN). (even LLTD is not routable beyond router)
Editted: You need to see all machines, but does the enduser must see them ?
Regards, Philippe
Don't forget to mark as answer or vote as
helpful to help identify good information. ( linkedin endorsement never hurt too :o) )
Answer an interesting question ? Create a
wiki article about it!

Can I use a 1 3T base station as a router/backup and a second 3T as a backup only without comflict?

Can I use a 1 3T base station Time Capsule as a router/backup and a second 3T base station as a Time Machine backup router without conflict?

Sure, as long as you have a different name for each device, and plan to connect the two Time Capsules together using a permanent, wired Ethernet cable connection between them.

Configuring MPLS VPN using static routing

Hi,
I am managed to set up a BGP/MPLS VPN in a laboratory using CS3620 routers running IOS 12.2(3) with ISIS. I am thinking of using static routes among the PE and P routers instead of a IGP. Does anyone know if Cisco routers supports static configuration of LSP? I have tried but could not get it work.

You can very well run MPLS with static routing in the core, as in Cisco we have to meet 2 criterias to have a MPLS forwarding Table.
1) Creating the LIB
This thing lies in having LDP neighborship netween two peers and you have Label bindings.
This is irrespective of what is the best next hop to reach the advertising peers LDP_ID.
2) Creating the LFIB
Now after considering all the Label bindings, the LDP_ID which can be reached out an interface
as a next hop, those Label bindings get installed in the LFIB.
So considering the above two points, we have to be careful in static routes
only for interfaces like Ethernet (Multiaccess Segments).
As in CEF when you give a static route pointing to an Ethernet Interface, CEF creates a
GLean Adjacency (Meaning there could be multiple hosts as the next hop on this segement, and it will glean for the right next-hop)
Now you may observe that when you give a static route only pointing to an Ethernet interface,
you LDP adjacency may come up and you may exchange the bindings with each other. But the Label Forarding Table is not created. This is bcos of this being a Multiaccess interface. And you have
Glean For it. If its a Normal WAN interface like Serial or POS, then there is no problem of
GLean and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
So to avoid probelems with Ethernet interfaces you can simply specify the next-hop-ip address.
For Eg: ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 10.10.31.226 (Without the Interface)
ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 fa0/0 10.10.31.226 (Or with the Interface)
Only Difference in both is in the first one it has to do a recursive lookup for the outgoing interface. Otherwise both work well. And you can have static routes in your network
running MPLS.
And doing this CEF would would work as it should and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
So this is applicable for Cisco devices which use CEF, including 6500 with SUP720.
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop

How to match filters to moving object using motion tracking ?

Hi:)
Excuse me for imperfect english.
I'd like to perform the famous face wrao effect that I've seen in a tutorial for ADOBE AE.
I've to match move a filter (like distortion-bulge) o a moving object using motion tracking, but i've nit able to perform it.
(I want to distort an eye in a face that moves it)
THanks

Specialcase gives an excellent tutorial here:
http://motionsmarts.com/tutorials/matchmove1/mm1.html
Patrick

RV082 does not reliably pass one-to-one static route anymore

Greetings!
I've been pulling my hair out, and hope someone can help. I have a RV082 connected to a Comcast business-class internet with 6 static IP's one-to-one routed to specific internal hosts. This configuration has been stable for several years.
A few days ago, the RV082 stopped routing most of the external static requests to their specific internal hosts. External machines only display the "Can't connect to the webpage" error. Rebooting the RV082 re-enabled correct operation for about 30 minutes, then it failed again.
I pulled out my backup RV082, flashed it with the current configuration, and swapped it in. It acted the same - external statics route correctly for about 30 minutes, then it just stops.
Anyone have any ideas as to where I can look to figure this out?
Thanks - Joe

Funny that you mention calling the Small Business Support Center - I was talking with them most of yesterday afternoon. I must say that I received *excellent* support from them! It's been 18 hours without a failure (whereas before it was failing after 30 minutes or sooner).
I will not hesitate to contact Small Business Support in the future for any other difficult problems - very professional, and took the time to understand my environment.
Thanks - Joe

What syntax would I use to take off a DMZ, Outside static route from a Pix

I am having a problem with mail coming in and currently have all smtp traffic going to a mail filtering server. I want to point the traffic directly to the exchange server instead, but, before I do I want to make sure that I can take that static route off after the test.
This is the syntax that I have and would like to change.
static (DMZ,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx smtp 172.16.xxx.xxx smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
I would like to point it to another IPA and then take it off.

Hello,
not sure if this is what you are asking, but check this link to the PIX command reference:
static
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/s.htm#wp1026694
HTH,
GP

IP SLA, Tunnels, and static routes

Here's the scenario: 1 router will have a primary and secondary ISP connection. I set up an SLA to track connectivity on the primary connection. Here are the static routes:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 12.54.X.X 255.255.255.240 GigabitEthernet0/0 track 10
ip route 12.54.X.Y 255.255.255.255 X.15.115.X track 10
ip route 192.168.32.0 255.255.240.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 192.168.48.0 255.255.252.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 192.168.56.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 12.54.X.X 255.255.255.240 GigabitEthernet0/1 254
ip route 12.54.X.Y 255.255.255.255 X.15.81.X 254
ip route 192.168.32.0 255.255.240.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 192.168.48.0 255.255.252.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 192.168.56.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel56 254
So I shut down the port (gi0/0) belonging to the primary port. At this point, it seemed like it worked fine. The routes shifted over to the backup routes. However, when I re-enabled the port, only two of the routes switched back. The routes pointing to Tunnels stayed on the secondary tunnel. When I browsed my static routes, I saw this:
Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0
S*    0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Tunnel56
      12.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
S        12.x.x.16/28 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
S        12.x.y.20/32 [1/0] via x.15.115.x
S     192.168.32.0/20 is directly connected, Tunnel56
S     192.168.48.0/22 is directly connected, Tunnel56
S     192.168.56.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel56
Is there something special I need to do for Tunnels to allow the Tunnel routes to switch back automatically?

Hello Ken,
I can see you are sending the probe packets to the same object ( using the track ID 10 )
After you bring the interface tunnel up, can you confirm if you can send traffic to that object?
Regards,
Julio

Static routes, ISDN & different remote IP addresses

Scenario:
My client has 4 sites situated around an ISP MPLS cloud. All 4 CE routers connect to ISP PE equipment via different access circuits (See attached diagram).
The central site has Cisco 2800 router with 10M LES circuit into MPLS cloud (FastEthernet i/f) and ISDN BRI i/f for incoming calls from 3 remote sites.
The 3 remote sites are Cisco 1800 routers all with ISDN dial-out i/fs and 1 site has numbered X21 serial link into MPLS cloud, whilst other 2 sites have IP unnumbered DSL circuits.
Problem:
1. Routing on the 4 routers is by static routes only, as ISP does not permit routing protocol.
2. Central router does not know if the remote DSL & X21 circuits have gone down, as they are all access circuits into MPLS cloud.
3. Central router (2800) needs floating static routes to change so that packets route via ISDN when remote sites dial in, but these are proving problematic to configure, as both the ISDN and FastEther i/fs show as up on the 2800 under normal operation. So the routes stay as the higher weighted route all the time, regardless of whether the remote has dialled in or not.
The remote routers (3) can dial in fine when their Serial or ATM interfaces go down (using backup command on i/fs). I have tried using floating static routes on the central router using 10.1.0.0/29 addresses assigned to the 4 ISDN interfaces, but the floating static remains up all the time, as the interface on the central router stays up all the time (as expected). The ISDN static route therefore stays in the routing table all the time, even when there is no ISDN call into the central site. The config on the central router is as follows:
interface BRI0/1/0
ip address 10.1.0.1 255.255.255.248
encapsulation ppp
isdn switch-type basic-net3
ppp authentication chap
ip route 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.2
ip route 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200
ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.3
ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200
ip route 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.0.4
ip route 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200
The only way I think I can get around this problem in a simple manner is to have floating static routes with higher weights assigned to completely different IP addresses than the local ISDN interface. In the past I have seen that async modems dialing into a PRI circuit appear as directly connected in the routing table of an AS5300 (and work), even though they may be different network addresses than the PRI Dialer i/f address. An example of the static routes on the central router would be as follows:
ip route 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.2 (Route to site 1 only when ISDN backup is invoked)
ip route 172.16.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200 (Route to site 1 under normal conditions, i.e when remote has NOT dialled central via ISDN)
ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 3.3.3.3 (Route to site 2 only when ISDN backup is invoked)
ip route 172.16.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200 (Route to site 2 under normal conditions, i.e when remote has NOT dialled central via ISDN)
ip route 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 4.4.4.4 (Route to site 3 only when ISDN backup is invoked)
ip route 172.16.4.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.0.1 200 (Route to site 3 under normal conditions, i.e when remote has NOT dialled central via ISDN)
Questions:
1. Has anyone experienced this type of problem across multiple access circuits?
2. Has anyone tried to implement different IP addresses at the remote ends of an ISDN network? (See diagram below) I want to try /32 addresses on the 4 routers, e.g 1.1.1.1, 2.2.2.2, 3.3.3.3 and 4.4.4.4. (Dont have time to lab test this solution)
3. Can anyone suggest a simple solution?

What you want is object tracking, which will resolve this problem.
This technology sets up an object that pings a remote address. You use a route map to force the ping out of the interface that appears to remain up, in this case the MPLS main interface.
When a link fails somewhere, the object no longer gets a response and transitions to the down state.
You can use a static route that tracks the object to become active, this will be used to activate your local ISDN.
This was described in Packet Magazine 2ndQ 2004, here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac123/ac114/downloads/packet/packet/apr04/pdfs/apr04.pdf
Read the article about Static and Policy Routing Enhancements, its excellent and should help you out.
Another way would be to build a GRE based VPN over the existing MPLS network, have you considerd that?
Andy

Check for Null in Mediator Static Routing filter

Using Expression Builder for Mediator component how can I check the values for NULL in a particular XML element. In my case the XSD is
<xs:complexType name="OdsCadDataSet">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="odsCadCase" type="OdsCadCase" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadEvent" type="OdsCadEvent" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadUnitStatus" type="OdsCadUnitStatus"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
I want to check in expression builder of mediator whether odsCase, odsCadEvent, odsCadUnitStatus is been processed. I have three static routing for each element and plan to put filter which checks is odsCadCase is null and so forth. How to have this use case.
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 28/06/2010 00:15

helo, i have same problem here...
I have a xsd:choice on request like this:
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="80003"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="0000J1MQVAZBDC^5lVg8yZ1DtZWJ000T5r"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="10.106.17.137"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
<ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:anoGuia>2011</ns1:anoGuia>
<ns1:numeroGuia>314</ns1:numeroGuia>
<ns1:codigoFatoGerador>6</ns1:codigoFatoGerador>
<ns1:codigoPorte>77011</ns1:codigoPorte>
</ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoPorte/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:idPessoa/>
</ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:numeroGuiaPai/>
<ns1:anoGuiaPai/>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
</ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:dataVencimento/>
<ns1:valorMulta/>
<ns1:percentualDesconto/>
<ns1:percentualAcrescimo/>
</ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
</ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
I tried everything to check if some of the requests are filled but allways mediator returns null:
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaReferenciaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaCompensacao.getGuiaCompensacao"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "$in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaCompensacaoRequest != ''" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaRemanescenteService.getGuiaRemanescente"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaRemanescenteRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaMultaService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaMultaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDividaAtiva.getGuiaDividaAtiva"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDividaAtivaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDesarquivamento.getGuiaDesarquivamento"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaComplementarService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaComplementarRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaNormalService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaNormalRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>

Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object Tracking

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for