Repeated entry of same material during costing of header

Hi ,
during costing run of a header material, a component assigned only once in BOM is comming in multiple line items with different qty.
what may be the reason?
Regards

Hi vivek/ jiaul,
Thanks for reply,
BOM component is not recursive.
component is assgined only once in BOM . I checked CS12 also and its assigned only once in header.
Let me tell the structure of assignment of this raw material which is coming multiple times.
This Raw material is assigned to Phantom material and the phantom is assigned to header material and we are running the costing run of the header material.
In costing run This raw material is coming multiple times with diffrent qtd. out of which only one lineitem is correct and other lineitems are coming of same material with diffrent qtd.(nowhere in BOM this diffrent qtd which is coming is maintained)
what else to be checked, please advice.
Regards,
Edited by: pp savvy on Jul 3, 2010 3:18 PM

Similar Messages

How to restrict the entry of same material twice on the order

HI,
How to restrict the entry of same material twice on the order before saving the Order ?
I do not want my users to enter the same material as two different line items in the order.
Any inputs wud b appreciated

Hi Vam,
For this you need to take the help of an ABAPer . Ask him to modify the user exit and add the logic.
For user exit please go through the below link it will help you to resolve your issue.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/1c/f62c7dd435d1118b3f0060b03ca329/content.htm
Regards,
Krishna O
Edited by: Krishna O on Jun 3, 2010 12:29 PM

How to avoide entry of same material in line item in same sales order?

Dear SD Experts,
In my project client has requirement related to Material in sales order. Client wants " while creating sales order (VA01) that time particular Material should use one time in the sales order". If same material used more than one time in item line in the existing sales order that time system must give the Error Massage.
Kindly suggest me how can I fulfill above requirement.
Regards,
Manzoor Ahmad

Hi Manzoor Ahmad,
This is an interesting requirement and this cannot be achieved through Standard SAP functionality. We can achive this through custom development in Userexit MV45AFZZ with the help of Developer . The logic has to be while creating sales order , you have created line no 10 with "matl no 1234 " and again trying to use the same material in line no 30 , then the system has to check all the line items that are created before the line no 30 . This same logic need to be applied for Tcode VA02 also.
Please post the the solution once implemented.
Thanks and regards
Veera

Adding quantity field for the same material number in Table control

Hello Experts,
I have an requirement, where I need to add the quantity field when the material number is repeated in a table control.
Here I show the pop-up message "Material already exists, do you want to add the quantity". If the user clicks on Yes I need to add the quantity.
I created the pop-up message using the FM " POPUP_TO_CONFIRM" and tried to add the quantity filed using COLLECT statement but I couldn't because my non-numeric field value will be different and it will insert new entry with same material in my internal table.
I have a z data base table & internal table with the below fields in it.
Best Regards,
Mani

hi deepthi,
chk a sample one which will help u. f4 hlp in table control
* Screen flow logic........
PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
*MODULE PBO_MODULE.
PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
*MODULE PAI_MODULE.
PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST. "F4
FIELD EKPO-EBELP MODULE help_ekpo.
* populate screen field from within PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST(F4) call
*& Module help_responsibility INPUT
* text
MODULE help_ekpo INPUT.
**Transport values to table dynpro/screen table control
DATA: l_stepl LIKE sy-stepl,
 l_indx LIKE sy-stepl.
DATA: dynpfields LIKE dynpread OCCURS 5 WITH HEADER LINE.
* Adjust for scroling within table control
CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_GET_STEPL'
 IMPORTING
 povstepl = l_stepl
 EXCEPTIONS
 stepl_not_found = 0
 OTHERS = 0.
l_indx = tc_ekpotable-top_line + l_stepl - 1.
 "tc_ekpotable should already have been declared
REFRESH dynpfields.
CLEAR dynpfields.
dynpfields-fieldname = 'EKPO-EBELN'.
dynpfields-fieldvalue = '00010' "wa_ekpo-ebeln.
dynpfields-stepl = l_stepl.
APPEND dynpfields.
dynpfields-fieldname = 'EKPO-EBELP'.
dynpfields-fieldvalue = '00020' "wa_ekpo-ebelp.
dynpfields-stepl = l_stepl.
APPEND dynpfields.
CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
 EXPORTING
 dyname = 'SAPLZZ_EKKO' "Program name
 dynumb = '0100' "Screen number
 TABLES
 dynpfields = dynpfields
 EXCEPTIONS
 OTHERS = 0.
ENDMODULE. " help_ekpo INPUT
rgds
Anver
if hlped kindly mark points

Cost Estimation Through Two PIR valid for same material

Hello Everyone
I am trying to costing strategy with PIR (Purchase Info Record). Just to check whether its working right or not i have only choosen sub strategy 'Effective Price from Quotation'. My problem is we have got more than one PIR for the same material from different vendors (both have valid dates). My first question is how system will calculate if both PIRs for same material is valid with different prices.
My expectation was that system should pick up the price from PIR which has regular vendor flag ticked in PIR master record but this is not the case. System is picking up the price from the other PIR although i don't know the logic. I am observing system is picking the lower price (as i tested two materials) in both cases. Can anybody guide me how can i make sure that system picks up the price from PIR which has regular ticked or can anybody suggest something elsethat which is right sub strategy to use for PIR?
Thanks in advence

Hi Young Sun
The link really helped me a lot to understand the process how system is picking up price. We don't use source list and quota requirement. I have noticed that system will not consider regualr flag tick in PIR for costing unless you you configure at backend in
Material Logistics->Purchasing->Source Determination->Define Regular Vendor
Once i have activated that tick system is working fine and picking up the price from regular vendor flag. If regular vendor is not ticked system will go vendor with lower price.
@Imdad: Thanks for your kind help as well and input.
Many thanks again.
Regards

Complex Product Costing Scenario- Separate overhead rates to same material

Hello- I have a strangely complex scenario at my current client.
They wish to apply different overhead rates to the same raw material (one material number in SAP) which is a part of two different BOMs to the same Semi-Finished product (one material number in SAP). This semi-finished product needs to be costed 2 different ways with 2 different BOMs, routings and overhead rates and then i need to use mixed costing to come up with a blended rolled-up cost to update in the material master of the semi-finished product. I am able to get past all challenges but the only open item is to be able to apply different overhead rates to the same material.
Limitations:
1- We have to use Standard price, not moving average.
2- Split valuation idea thrown out the window.
3- Using 2 different material numbers for the raw materials thrown out of the window.
4- Business area idea thrown out of the window.
basically, coming back to the original issue at hand, the challenge is to be able to apply different overhead rates to one material number in SAP.

Hi
There are available,, But you have thrown them out of the window already
I believe you need to rampup your overhead absorption mechanism... if ovh is dependant on the component, then it should remain fixed/.. however, if it is getting changed bsaed on the parent material, then driver is not the component, but the Parent material
hence, your overhead should be based on Parent material... Assign an overhead group to the Parent material say, 100 and 110 to the 2 Parent materials.... Now you maintain separate % of overhead per overhead group.... BASE would be the raw material consumption cost element
@ Subodh: Do you think above suggestion will work?? I think exit need not be used if I have understood his requirement clear
br, Ajay M

Please maintain the master data for material during product cost collector

hi
i get a error
please maintain the master data for material during product cost collector
please guide me
regards
leo

Hi Leo,
Can you elaborate your issue, like when did you get the error exactly?
If it is the error you got while creating Product Cost Collector, then this is not the right Forum to post.
Please post your question in the 'ERP Manufacturing (PP)' forum
Regards,
Manimaran M

In MIGO two seperate entry for the same Material in Accounting Document

Dear Expert,
Hi
Business is doing stock transfer transaction. Here with reference to stock transfer PO when business is doing Goods Issue.
here there is two stock transfer PO. in one PO there is two line items for the same material. in the second PO again same material with two line items.
but at the tme of Goods issue it is showing two seperate line for same material stock account credit in accounting document. but in the other Goods issue with reference to second PO it is showing only one line for inventory account credit in the accounting dcoument.
so pl. guide me on this.
thanks
H shah

Hi,
Step 1 : First we create the Stock transfer PO.
Step 2 : Goods issue with ref to above stock transfer PO ( Movement type 351) - MIGO
Step 3 : Goods Receipt with ref to above stock transfer PO ( Movement Type 101 )- MIGO
Thanks
H shah

Same Material with different itemcatagory groups

We have 3rd party manufacturers that make product for company and sometimes they send the finished product back to company and other times they will drop ship it to one of our customers.
this scenario we need to have the same material with different itemcatagory groups
i tried to create same material with different storage locations, but it's possible but the thing is when i change the item catagory group for the material , the same is applicable for 2nd same material, my requirement is i need 2 different itemcatagory for the same material, hope u understand my requirement
i will be expecting your possible replys.
Thanks & Regards
Venkat.Dhanemkula

Hi Venkat..
Please explain it more clear manner..
With whatever i have understand, i think you scenerio is manual 3rd party order processing.
In that case the material that you normally deliver yourself but occasionally need to order from a third-party vendor, you can overwrite the item category during sales order processing.
Keep only one material and specify the item category group NORM in the material master.
If, as an exception, you use a third-party material, change the entry TAN to TAS in the ItCa field when processing the sales document. The item is then processed as third-party item.
hope it helps you.
Regards
Harry

Cenvat to add on material during STO

Dear experts,
How we can load the cenvat cost on material during stock transfer from plant to plant within company code with shipping?
Manoj

Hi,
1. Create Z-Pricing condition for BED, ECS and SECess in M/06 and keep following controls active;
Cond. class A Discount or surcharge
Calculat.type A/B Percentage/Fixed amount (As per reqmt.)
Cond.category B Delivery costs
Plus/minus A Positive
Item Condition Active
Accrual Active
Vendor in GR 2 Entry always possible
2. Attach these condition types in STO Pricing Procedure in M/08 (SAP Std. Pricing is RM2000). Also assign an Accrual key to this condition
3. 3. You can create a new Accrual key in SPRO > MM > Purchasing > Conditions > Define Price Determination Process > Define Transaction/Event Keys
4. OBYC - Assign a Clearing A/c to the new Accrual Key
5. In ME21N - STO, maintain value for BED, ECS and SECess Conditions. Also assign the vendor in "details" option of this condition if reqrd.
6. VL10B - Outbound delivery w.r.t. STO (Mvmt 641)
Accounting Entry:
Stock A/c - Dr - 117 (In Receiving Plant)
Stock A/c - Cr - 100 (In Supplying Plant)
BED Clearing A/c - Cr - 14 (In Supplying Plant)
ECS Clearing A/c - Cr - 2 (In Supplying Plant)
SECess Clearing A/c - Cr - 1 (In Supplying Plant)
7. VF01 - Pro-forma Invoice w.r.t. Outbound Delivery
8. J1IIN - Outgoing Excise Invoice w.r.t Pro-forma Invoice
9. MIGO - GR in receiving plant (No A/c entry), In "Excise Invoice" Tab, select "No Excise Entry"
10. MIRO - LIV for "Planned delivery cost" w.r.t. STO if reqrd.

Repeated entries in VAPMA-sales index table-order item

Hi,
I want to know in which scenario SAP system create repeated entries in VAPMA-sales index table for same material and same order.as in my scenario system had created a repeated entries in VAPMA for same material in sales order.so it looks like duplicate entries except there is difference in some of the primary keys.
Thanks
Manish Gupta

Uhm... VAPMA is just an index table of VBAP/VBAK entries, so when you have different key fields that's when you'll see the "repeated" entries. When the key fields are different it's not a duplicate.

Only receiving repeat entries in iCal on iPhone 3GS v5.1.1 since iMac went down for service

Yesterday I took my iMac in for service. Today I was checkingl entries in iCal in my iPhone 3GS v5.1.1 and all entries were missing except those that were Repeat entries. I tried to go to iCloud to check iCal but iCloud didn't recognize my account and password and said I had to creat a new account.
What is up?

I had this same exact issue while traveling in Italy and France (I returned yesterday 17-October).
Before leaving, I verified by phone w/At&T that I had all necessary features to use my phone overseas. They said yes I did have all necessary features to use my phone overseas. They did offer me their AT&T World Traveler plan for $5.99/month but I declined since I would not use this feature enough to justify the monthly cost. They said my phone would still work overseas, but my per minute usage rate would be slightly higher. ...HOWEVER, I could not connect with any of the available networks while overseas (same results/messages as you).
I just spoke w/At&T again. Now they say I did not have the necessary feature to use my phone overseas. This is what I found out:
1. You can sign up online for the World Traveler $5.99/month plan. This will allow you to use your phone overseas.
2. If you do not want the $5.99/month plan, you need to have the Expanded International Roaming feature activated on your phone. If it is activated, you will see it on your online account under "International Features". Be aware, the rates will be higher for all services (I believe they told to make sure "Data Roaming" is turned off, otherwise I will be charged $20.00/minute for internet access")
3. If you have had your phone less than 90 days, and you want to activate Expanded International Roaming, you must call AT&T and ask to speak with International customer service. According to my recent phone call with AT&T, this is the only department that can activate the services (@ less than 90 days).
I'm still not confident this issue is resolved, but I will find out next time I travel outside the United States.

Multiple info records for the same material record in the catalog

Hi Guys,
I have got sort of a puzzle I can not solve at the moment, maybe some one can help me to solve it. The situation in our system landscape is as follows:
Systems:
SRM 5.0 (Classic implementation scenario)
ECC 6.0
SRM-MDM 2.0
PI 2005
Material master is maintained in R/3 and the materials are replicated to SRM. From SRM we replicate all materials to the catalog repository in SRM-MDM.
As the material master in R/3 is vendor independent, the materials replicated to SRM also have no vendor attached. For the first initial material replication from SRM to the catalog SRM-MDM this also means that the products in the main table of the repository, u2018catalog positionsu2019, will not have a vendor or vendor number attached (i.e. no reference to a source of supply).
To assign a source of supply in the repository to a product (record) we will use info records which are replicated from R/3 to SRM-MDM. The mapping for this in the Import Manager can only be based on the product number. As this is the only unique value available which can map a info record to a already existing (but vendor less) ptoduct item in the catalog.
As long as every item in the repository has only one unique info record, meaning one source of supply with a specific price, there is no issue in the above scenario. Based on the product-id, the info record data will be matched with the material item in the catalog.
The issue for me arises when multiple info records exists for the same material. The info records can heave different vendors and different prices. All possible vendors should be available in the catalog for the same material (at least this is the requirement ).
At this point the product-id will no longer be an unique value. Importing the info records will cause problems, as only one material record is available in the repository for the specific product-id (remember that when doing a initial replication of the material master to the catalog, no vendor data is replicated).
Does anyone had this issue before, and knows a solution? Is it for example possible during the import of the info records in the Import manager, to duplicate material records in the destination data, based on the number of info records available in the source data for the same product-id. Or is there an other solution that I am missing?
Your help would be appreciated!
Regards,
Skander

Dear Poster
Your thread has had no response since it's creation over
2 weeks ago, therefore, I recommend that you either:
- Rephrase the question.
- Provide additional Information to prompt a response.
- Close the thread if the answer is already known.
Thank you for your compliance in this regard.
Jason Boggans
SAP SRM SDN Moderator

Same material can exist on multiple line items for the same order.

Hi
Is there any specific customising setting or web shop setting through which we can restrict user to add same material on multiple line items for the same order ?
Regards

No.
But if this is a must requirement, you can do an elaborate check during order save in ORDER_SAVE BAdI and return error. So, it will be only during order save.
Eawar Ram
http://www.parxlns.com

How to stop this multiple entry against same condition type in pricing

My client is using manual condition type for the basic price "ZBPR". Now system allowing multiple entry against this condition type in the pricing screen during order creation i.e in the first line if we put ZBPR 00 , in the second line system allowing to put another value against same ZBPR say for example 2000 & doing all subsequent calculations on the basis of 3000 .which is not at all acceptable by my client .Please suggest how to stop this multiple entry against same condition type

You have to make the condition type as Mandatory and not manual.
If you are entering many condition records of the ZPR0 then the latest entry will be taken for further processing for subtotal rebate and total price.
For all the other entered condition records will have yellow traffic signal which is not active.
you can assign a routine with the help pf your abaper...
In the Transaction VOFM define a requirement such that
you condition type takes value only one at the time of order entry.
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

Repeated entry of same material during costing of header

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for