Report J2I9 showing wrong entries..

Dear All,
We have created stock transfer PO.Delivery ,billing and excise invoice is created but while creating excise invoice by mistake user put series group which is for normal sales entry instead of stock transfer.
Now when we are executing report J2I9 (Inputs taken in particular month) one serial no entry is showing missed in the report which is above entry(After serial no 58,serial no 60 appears and 59 is missing) and because of this my abstract value is coming wrong which is same of the serial no 59.
My question is if J2I9 shows report for inputs taken only, then why this entry is calculated in abstraction of above report.
Also other stock transfer entries are not appearing then why this is appearing even if i am putting normal sales series group it should not appear.
what needs to do to solve it.
Naren

Hi Sujit,
Thanks for your reply. As you said, if it's because of exception aggregation, the same(wrong total)will be displayed for all the sales offices right?
Could you please let me know what are all the important tabs you want me to show?
Awaiting for your reply..
with thanks and regards,
Antony Jerald.

Similar Messages

Report to show unmapped entries in MapID context

I'm using TCS2 in WinXP.
Robohelp v. 8.0.2.208
Is there a report that will show me any entries that are not mapped in terms of the context sensitive map ids? I found the reports that show the used MapIDs and broken topic mapIDs...
I need this report b/c I think that the mapID file doesn't update by itself, i.e. if you delete something that is tagged in a context sensitive mapID file it doesn't just un-assign and delete itself, you have to manually edit the map ID file, and then manually add any new items that need to be included in the mapID file.
Thanks!
Adriana

The Topic Properties report can be customised to include / exclude various things, including map ids.
If you delete a topic, the map id goes with it. Tagging excludes a topic from a build, it does not delete the topic from the project.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
Follow me @petergrainge

BSIS showing wrong entries

Hello,
At my company, they run the MR11 to check for GR/IR variances and then clear these variances using the F.13 transaction. Finally, the F.19 transaction is run to check for PO's having the GR/IR variance.
There are some old PO's of 2005/2006 which are showing up on the F.19 report despite the fact that they have no GR/IR variance. I checked the PO's and they have no mismatches wither in GR/IR quantity or amount.
Some of these PO have different GR and IR dates but some others have the same date on the GR and IR. So even if it is the former case, as the F.13 clearing is done every month end, these PO's have been picked up for clearing.
I notice that these PO's are in the BSIS table (as they belong to the GL 211005 - A/P Accrual (Goods Received/Invoice Received) and so they appear in the F.19 output. However, once the F.13 clearing is done, the entry should disappear from the BSIS table. I am not sure why it is still there in
the table.
Could someone please explain why these PO's still show up on the F.19 report and in the BSIS table and if there is any way to remove these entries from the F.19 report?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Rugmani

I am having this same problem! It is happening whether I am connected to WiFi or not. I have tried to reset my location settings and that did nothing. I am hoping to find a solution.

KE80 Report Forumulas showing Wrong

Hi Report Painter Experts,
I have one issues regarding KE80 report, when i Run KE80 report Total Amount not matched..second issues please see the below
I have one more same report issues regarding, Report Painter KE80, Values two times showing for two Element , while should be shown on one Element,
I have made MIS report, under MIS Report
            Particular
Revenue                      100000 All Revenue GL Including Profit Center
Material Cost                50000 All Relevent M.Cost GL Including Cost Center
1    Manpower 2000 All Relevent GL A/c including Cost Center
2    Energy                            3000 All Relevent GL A/c Including Cost Center
3    Consumables                  1000 All Relevent GL A/c including Cost Center
C   Conversion Cost (1+2+3) 6000
D   Development Cost : under Development we have to capture only EN10 Cost Center 500
E   Sustaining Cost : Under sustaining Cost, FI10 Cost Center should ve display 300
F. Profit (A-B-C-D-E)        : 43,200/-
Depreciation                   : 300    All Relevent GL including FI10 Cost Center
Note : Whenever we do business transaction speciaclly Sustaning Cost and Depreciation updated of Rs. 300/- both Particulars in Sustaning as well Depreciation , we want only in Depreciation coz of FI10 Cost related with FI10, that’s why effected. How to control for sustaing cost not be updated of Rs.300/- in Sustaning Cost.
G. Depreciation              300 A;; Relevent Cost Element GL Including Cost Center
H. Finance Cost             100 All Relevent Cost Element GL including Cost Center
I. Other Income & Loss   150 All Relevent Cost Element GL including Profit Center
J . PBT Profit Before Tax (F-G-H-I)
Kindly Help me, Sustaing Cost not comes Value Rs. 300/- only Depreciation .
Kind regards
Pranav Kr. Gupta
SAP FICO Consultant.

Hi Sujit,
     Thanks for your reply. As you said, if it's because of exception aggregation, the same(wrong total)will be displayed for all the sales offices right?
Could you please let me know what are all the important tabs you want me to show?
Awaiting for your reply..
with thanks and regards,
Antony Jerald.

BEx report is showing wrong total but individual cell's total gives correct figure

Hi,
     For a bex report at sales office level, there are about 110 sales offices giving sales figures. But for some 2 sales offices, it's not giving the correct figure(for Total Volume). When I bring the Bex report at sales office level and customer level, I could get individual sales figures for some customers present in that sales office. But if I take the total of all customer's total volume, I'm getting exact figures (i.e., the correct figure for total volume)but it's total displayed by BEx report is wrong.
for eg:
Sales Office     Total Volume
101                    100
102                    150
103                    300
Let us take the above example. Here, Sales office 101, 102 are correct wit its total volume. For sales office 103, for validation if I bring customer as:
Sales office     Customer     Total Volume
103                    111               20
                         112               80
                         113             101
                         114               22
                         115               82
The total of above Total volume is 305 but it's displayed as 300.
Only for some one or two sales offices. It's cube is giving the correct data if I take up it's sum.
Plz help me to resolve the problem.
with Regards,
Antony Jerald.

Hi Sujit,
     Thanks for your reply. As you said, if it's because of exception aggregation, the same(wrong total)will be displayed for all the sales offices right?
Could you please let me know what are all the important tabs you want me to show?
Awaiting for your reply..
with thanks and regards,
Antony Jerald.

Customer Exit - Fill variable value - Report is showing wrong records

Hi Gurus,
I'm building a query where the user will type a date.
So I need to show in report just the records where Valid From <= User input date <= Valid To.
I've created to variables for this:
ZMSCOG07 (Single, Mandatory) = user input variable used in Valid From characteristic restriction.
ZMPCOG10 (Single, Mandatory) = customer exit variable to get ZMSCOG07 value and to be used as restriction to Valid To characteristic.
Then in the query I restricted Valid From characteristic:
Valid From <= ZMSCOG07
and Valid To characteristic:
Valid To >= ZMPCOG10
Follow my code in CMOD transaction:
WHEN 'ZMPCOG10'.
    IF I_STEP = 2.
        READ TABLE I_T_VAR_RANGE INTO LOC_VAR_RANGE
        with key VNAM = 'ZMSCOG07'.
        CLEAR L_S_RANGE.
        if sy-subrc = 0.
            L_S_RANGE-LOW = LOC_VAR_RANGE-LOW.
        endif.
        L_S_RANGE-SIGN     = 'I'.
        L_S_RANGE-OPT      = 'EQ'.
        APPEND L_S_RANGE TO E_T_RANGE.
    ENDIF.
I already tried to put L_S_RANGE-OPT = 'GE' in the variable range and in the query to restrict Valid To characteristic:
Valid From = ZMPCOG10.
But it's not working correctly. The report is just considering Valid From restriction and showing to me all the records where Valid From <= ZMSCOG07. It seems that ZMPCOG10 is not being filled. Could somebody help me?
Thanks in advance,
Helder

Hi Helder,
I understand your requirement but I don't understand the solution you are using. I think it's a bit tricky.
What I would do is:
Create three variables:
- VAR1: Single value, mandatory, ready for input, customer exit. Used to store "User input date"
- VAR2: Select option, customer exit, not ready for input. Used to store Valid From restriction.
- VAR3: Select option, customer exit, not ready for input. Used to store Valid to restriction.
Then, use this code:
WHEN 'VAR2'.
IF I_STEP = 2.
READ TABLE I_T_VAR_RANGE INTO LOC_VAR_RANGE
with key VNAM = 'VAR1'.
CLEAR L_S_RANGE.
L_S_RANGE-LOW = LOC_VAR_RANGE-LOW.
L_S_RANGE-SIGN = 'I'.
L_S_RANGE-OPT = 'LE'.
APPEND L_S_RANGE TO E_T_RANGE.
ENDIF.
WHEN 'VAR3'.
IF I_STEP = 2.
READ TABLE I_T_VAR_RANGE INTO LOC_VAR_RANGE
with key VNAM = 'VAR1'.
CLEAR L_S_RANGE.
L_S_RANGE-LOW = LOC_VAR_RANGE-LOW.
L_S_RANGE-SIGN = 'I'.
L_S_RANGE-OPT = 'GE'.
APPEND L_S_RANGE TO E_T_RANGE.
ENDIF.
I think this should work, and you'll have three independent variables used for one purpose each.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Diego

Reversal Document is Showing wrong figure in Service Tax Report

Hi All,
The data inconsistence in Service Tax Report.
The reversal documents are showing the excess amount while runnig the Service tax report.
Could you please help in finidng the reason and solution for this behaviour. All reversal documents are showing excess amounts in this case.
Thanks,
Nandu

Hi all,
The Tax transfer amount of reversal document should be Zero in ST Report and in Final GL. But the service tax report is showing wrong figures.
We reversed the tax transfer document to remove the wrong line from Serv. Tax Report as well as from Final GL.
As per the business requirement if any invoice and payment is wrongly done, that should be reversed.
Before reversal of this we need to reverse the tax transfer entry, then only we can reverse the payment as well as the Invoice.
Apart from this, If any other procedure please let me know in order to avoid errors in the service tax report
Regards,
Nandu

Aggregate table showing wrong data

Hello Gurus:
I am working on an issue, where a report is showing wrong value for an aggregated fact table.
If I try not including it in query, then results work fine. But by default BI server is pointing to aggregate table ( which it should ).
So my questions are
1) Does Aggregate tables are refreshed automatically with DAC?
2) I know data is wrong in aggregate table. How do I verify?
3) How to make a particular report hit regular table instead of aggregate table?
Please let me know.
Thanks.
~Vinay

Alright. So I made some progress on this issue, HOWEVER it is still not solved.
1) Aggregated tables are refreshed daily with DAC. There is a script for that on server which is created using Aggregate Persistence wizard.
2) ONLY one column is showing wrong data. I have verified this using Toad. However I dont know why is it showing wrong data. Theoretically it should be fine.
3) this question is still same.
How to make a particular report hit regular table instead of aggregate table?
Please help me out.
Thanks.
~Vinay

"Invoice History Report "show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD

Invoice History Report show wrong balance for supplier invoice with USD Currency
After I run this report i see in the last of this report there is difference between the supplier total
USD (Currency ) and the open Balance USD , it is decreased the open balance
for supplier with 2300 USD with out any reasons
bellow is some data copy of the report
======================================================
Supplier Site Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Site Total: USD 39,000.00
Supplier Total: SAR 34,700.00
Supplier Total: USD 39,000.00
Open Balance: SAR 34,700.00
Open Balance: USD 36,700.00
*** End of Report ***
==============================================
please advise me from where can this differenc ( 39000 - 36,700=2300 )COMMING
or it is bug in this report , becuase i compare this report with other report in account payable like
-supplier open balance letter
-invoice register report
-invoice aging report
all this report give me the amount for supplier USD =39000
BUT AGIN FROM WHERE THE SYSTEM DECREASED THE AMOUNT TO 36,700
thanks

Can you try running Create Accounting For payments just before you run the Invoice History Report and re-check .
Thanks

Standard program showing wrong values in ALV report

Hi All,
Standard Report 'RFBILA00' (Balance sheet P+L Statement) ,when i excute for classical list the output showing correct.
But with the same test data when i run for ALV Grid control showing wrong valuse like.
with same company code comparision year,comparision period ,comp periods...when i run classical list:
PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                                 5,194,871.12-
RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD                    5,194,871.12-
NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                        5,194,871.12.
when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is:
PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION                           9,307,137.09
RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD              5,194,871.12-
NET PROFIT/(LOSS)                                                 22,076,715.82.
Please help on this....and this is standard report.. y its showing different for same data.
Thank you
Anu.

Hi ,
Same program excuted once by selecting classical list is showing correct. And with same data excuted with ALV grid list showing wrong valuse.
when selected with Classical list: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8
Comparison year-2009.
PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 5,194,871.12-
RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 5,194,871.12.
when i run in ALV for same above data, the result is: for company code:8000,Reporting periods: 1-9,Reporting year:2009,Comparison periods:1-8 Comparison year-2009.
PROFIT/LOSS BEFORE TAXATION 9,307,137.09
RETAINED PROFIT/LOSS FOR THE PERIOD 5,194,871.12-
NET PROFIT/(LOSS) 22,076,715.82.
Thank You,
Anu.

Report showing wrong data

Hi Gurus,
When we are generating report in the answers in one column it is showing wrong data from where i have to start for this issue.
Thanks,
Rafi

Pull that column alone,run report, compare the results with your manual query, and also compare the physical query.
if all are good then try to add other column from any other dim and then do the same as above
repeat till you know the cause.
Pls mark if helps

Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown

Hi all,
using SAP FF rel. 5.2 - VIRSANH 520_620 I encountered the same issues
described in notes n°:
- 1064911 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown
- 1152284 Firefighter Log Report-Wrong entries being shown with
dates
The solutions described in these notes are not valid for my SAP
release:
VIRSANH 520_620
Does someone know if are available the same corrections for my SAP FF Rel.?
Thanks in advance,
Claudio Orsi

Hi Claudio,
Not sure if this helps any....
We recently upgraded FF 5.2 (520_620) to current SP levels and experienced some issues with the reporting feature
We utilize the reports through the NetWeaver interface and were not receiving correct results; this happened after we went from SP 3 to SP 4
We have backed out the SP4 level to get back to "what was working"; we have an issue opened with SAP and they have identified our experience as a bug and plan on a fix with the next release scheduled for end of June
Are you experiencing report issues using the NetWeaver interface or the backend report tools? What is the SP level you are at?
This information on our experience may or may not be helpfull but anything can be of some value as long as it is mentioned
Jerry Synoga
Ryerson, Inc.
630-758-2021

0ORGUNIT with 0EMPLOYEE report shows duplicate entries in Hierarchy

Hi
I am triyng to build a report like PO13 in ECC (Organization Tree with Position & Org Unit).
The report is built on 0EMPLOYEE and uses the 0ORGUNIT as a nav att with Hier
But in BW the report is showing the Employee twice!
Once in the top level of the hierarchy and in the level it suppose to be.
Any body knows why?
Thanks
Edan

Ran into the same requirement at a previous client. They desired an org chart in BI.
However, the way BW hierarchies seem to work, is that it will repeat the characteristic value for each node higher in the hierarchy.
For instance, if your hierarchy looks like All Company -> Division -> Dept. -> Group, and Employee 'Joe Bob' is a member of 'Group'. If you have all levels displayed in BEx, 'Joe Bob' will be included under each level.
We found that the hierarchies are good for rolling up the fact data, but terrible for presenting characteristic data compared to other reporting systems we were used to. We ended up pushing back and the users used the Org reports builtin to ECC.

Showing Wrong Data in my Portal Activity Report.

Hi all,
I have created a Portal Activity Report which shows the
Details about the users who logged on.
Im trying to show the details of fixed period some what between 2008.for this I have given some fixed period date in the Reporting Period tab.
but the data which is showing on the report is of 2006 n 2007 data...im not getting the data of 2008...not even single record is of 2008.
I have checked with Data Collection Service Configuration setting...it is showing true thr...i tried with restarting that service also but there is no affect to report data...
What to do...plz help...
Thanks and Regards,
Visweswar.

Hi,
The property is called Monitor Users. Set to Yes (default is No).
Hope this helps.
Daniel

Data in the cube is showing wrong when compared with ODS

Hello BW Gurus,
We have a waste report in production planning on Cube and ODS separately. The same info package loads both targets (which means same infosource) but when we run a report on Cube, the records are showing multiple entries (i.e. Key Figures are not matching when compared to ODS) where as the ODS records are showing correctly as it was in R/3. There are totally 6 key figures out of which 4 pulled from R/3 and 2 are populated in BW.
An Example:
Waste report in PP run for plant 1000 for 12/2005 and process order 123456. The operational scrap should be 2.46% and the component scrap should be 3.00% for material 10000000. The report is showing 7.87% for planned operational waste % and 9.6% for planned component waste %. These values are not correct. The ODS values for order 123456 matched the data in R/3 for component and operational scrap.
There is a Start routine to the ODS and also to the cube. I am not good at ABAP so requesting your Help.
<b>Here is the ODS Code:</b>
tables: /BI0/PPRODORDER.
loop at data_package.
    select single COORD_TYPE
                  PRODVERS
      into (/BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE,
            /BI0/PPRODORDER-PRODVERS)
      from /BI0/PPRODORDER
     where PRODORDER = data_package-PRODORDER
       and OBJVERS   = 'A'.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      if /BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE = 'XXXX'
      or /BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE = 'YYYY'.
        data_package-PRODVERS = space.
      else.
        data_package-PRODVERS = /BI0/PPRODORDER-PRODVERS.
      endif.
    endif.
    if data_package-calday = space
    or data_package-calday = '00000000'.
      if data_package-TGTCONSQTY NE 0.
        data_package-calday = data_package-ACTRELDATE.
      endif.
    endif.
    modify data_package.
endloop.
<b>Here is Cube Code:</b>
tables: /BI0/PPRODORDER,
           /BIC/ODS.
TYPES:
BEGIN OF ys_mat_unit,
    material                 TYPE /bi0/oimaterial,
    mat_unit                 TYPE /bi0/oimat_unit,
    numerator                TYPE /bi0/oinumerator,
    denomintr                TYPE /bi0/oidenomintr,
END OF ys_mat_unit.
DATA:
    l_s_mat_unit             TYPE ys_mat_unit,
    e_factor                 type p decimals 5.
loop at data_package.
    select single COORD_TYPE
                  PRODVERS
      into (/BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE,
            /BI0/PPRODORDER-PRODVERS)
      from /BI0/PPRODORDER
     where PRODORDER = data_package-PRODORDER
       and OBJVERS   = 'A'.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      if /BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE = 'XXX'
      or /BI0/PPRODORDER-COORD_TYPE = 'YYY'.
        data_package-PRODVERS = space.
      else.
        data_package-PRODVERS = /BI0/PPRODORDER-PRODVERS.
      endif.
    endif.
    if data_package-calday = space
    or data_package-calday = '00000000'.
      if data_package-TGTCONSQTY NE 0.
        data_package-calday = data_package-ACTRELDATE.
      endif.
    endif.
    data_package-agsu     = 'GSU'.
    data_package-agsu_qty = 0.
    select single gr_qty
                  base_uom
      into (/BIC/ODS-gr_qty,
            /BIC/ODS-base_uom)
      from /BIC/ODS
     where prodorder = data_package-prodorder
       and material = data_package-material.
    if sy-subrc = 0.
      if /BIC/ODS-base_uom = 'GSU'.
        data_package-agsu_qty = /BIC/ODS-gr_qty.
      else.
        SELECT SINGLE * FROM /bi0/pmat_unit
          INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF l_s_mat_unit
          WHERE material   = data_package-material
            AND mat_unit   = 'GSU'
            AND objvers    = 'A'.
        IF sy-subrc = 0.
          IF l_s_mat_unit-denomintr <> 0.
            e_factor = l_s_mat_unit-denomintr /
                          l_s_mat_unit-numerator.
            multiply /BIC/ODS-gr_qty by e_factor.
            data_package-agsu_qty = /BIC/ODS-gr_qty.
          ENDIF.
        else.
          CALL FUNCTION 'UNIT_CONVERSION_SIMPLE'
            EXPORTING
              INPUT                = /BIC/ODS-gr_qty
              NO_TYPE_CHECK        = 'X'
              ROUND_SIGN           = ' '
              UNIT_IN              = /BIC/ODS-base_uom
              UNIT_OUT             = 'GSU'
            IMPORTING
              OUTPUT               = DATA_PACKAGE-gsu_qty
            EXCEPTIONS
              CONVERSION_NOT_FOUND = 1
              DIVISION_BY_ZERO     = 2
              INPUT_INVALID        = 3
              OUTPUT_INVALID       = 4
              OVERFLOW             = 5
              TYPE_INVALID         = 6
              UNITS_MISSING        = 7
              UNIT_IN_NOT_FOUND    = 8
              UNIT_OUT_NOT_FOUND   = 9
              OTHERS               = 10.
        endif.
      endif.
    endif.
    modify data_package.
endloop.
some how the AGSU qyt is not populating in the cube and when I dbug the code, I could see a clean record in the internal table but not in the cube.
your suggestion and solutions would be highly appreciated.
thanks,
Swathi.

Hi Swathi,
May be you might want to look into the way the % is being calculated in the cube. If the formula involves counting the no. of records, then you will also be counting the -ve records that are posted in the cube unless you have had a compression on the cube. that might give you wrong numbers.
Doniv

Report J2I9 showing wrong entries..

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for