Reporting Action in Error handler

We have a requirement to use Reporting action in the Service Error Handler to capture some details for the reports. We are using the JMS Messaging Proxy and in that transport options, we are using "Transaction" as Enabled to retry the failed messages.
Now when ever there the flow fails and is goes to the service error handler and there are no reports getting generated in the "Opeations->Messaging Reports". But when the "Transaction" option in the Transport option is disabled in the Proxy, we are getting the reports.
Is there any way to get the Reports generated with the "Transaction" option enabled ?

Then your reporting provider is handled within the same XA transaction as your proxy. Either both commit or both rollback. If you want to report error than you can still use XA transaction for your proxy, but you can't use it for your reporting provider.

Similar Messages

OSB 10gR3 Error handling and reporting action approach

My use case:
Simple Proxy service routes to an external web service created as Business service in OSB
Whenever there is transport error/soap fault from the external web service, that error needs to be reported along with the original request received by the proxy service.
What I have tried so far?
Created a error handler/stage in the route node of my proxy service. Within that stage, added a report action to report $body which contains the error received from the external service. I created a report index key/value to report for this request, I used a specific element in the body of the original request sent to the proxy service.
Within the route error handling stage, I realized that $body which had my original request to the proxy service lost its content and replaced by the fault from external WS. So I made a copy of $body in my request pipeline and tried to use an element from that copy to index my failed request. But the copied variable always seem to be empty within the error handling stage.
So, my questions to the experts,
1)What variables are visible within the error handling stage/scope?
2)What is the best way(less overhead) to preserve my original request as $body context variable is already changed with fault by the time error handler is invoked? Remember I wanted to report the original request only incase of error, for success cases I don't care/I don't want to un-necessarily add an overhead of copying to a vairbale.
3)Is there another proper way to simply report the original request received by proxy and fault received from external service for a given key in the request, say orderId
Sample proxy request:
<MyData>
<OrderId>123</OrderId>
</MyData>

1)What variables are visible within the error handling stage/scope? $fault - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/userguide/context.html#wp1051816
$body - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E13159_01/osb/docs10gr3/userguide/context.html#wp1103311
2)What is the best way(less overhead) to preserve my original request as $body context variable is already changed with fault by the time error handler is invoked? Remember I wanted to report the original request only incase of error, for success cases I don't care/I don't want to un-necessarily add an overhead of copying to a variable.Can you print $body and $fault variables in your error handler?. Are they different ? What I'm suspecting is the back-end webservice is faulting (returning soap-fault and http response =5xx). There is no other way I can think of than copying the contents of $body to a separate variable.
Thanks
Manoj

Report and Alert don't executed in the error handler with a JMS proxy service

Hi,
I'm working with OSB 11.1.1.4.0 and I'm facing a problem with the error handler of my JMS proxy service.
My error handler contains two main elements :
- a Report action
- an Alert with a JMS destination defined
When the business service failed the message remain in the queue. It's the expected behavior.
The problem is :
- the report is missing
- the alert is raised but missing in the JMS destination defined in the Alert setting.
I've noticed if I add a Reply with Failure or Success, Report and Alert are successfully executed.
Unfortunately the message don't remain in the JMS queue.
What can I do in order to have my report/alert done and the JMS transaction rollback in order to keep the message in the queue ?
I've already met this problem in the past with alsb v3 and my solution was to add Service Callout in the error handler in order to externalize these actions.
This solution is not convenient and I hope another solution is possible.

Inventorying workgroups can be difficult, especially when it comes to remote access and network security. Because workgroups are not centrally managed, some of the items discussed in this
wiki article on preparing your workgroup environment may require you to visit each machine individually.
For non-domain credentials, you do not use the <systemname>\<user> format, you simply enter the user name. Regarding how to enter the credentials, if you have an account that uses the same username and password on all machines and is an administrator
on all of those machines, then you can enter that in the All computers credentials page of the wizard. You can also do this if they are different user names. However, if some machines have an account with the same user name, such as Administrator,
but different passwords on each machine, you will need to use the Manually enter computer names discovery method, and then enter the information for each group or each machine.
As you can tell, workgroup environments can quickly negate any benefit that the agentless inventory nature of MAP provides.
Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click
"Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. Please
VOTE as HELPFUL if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

Option for error handling for DTP, ' no updata, no reporting" and "deactiva

Hello Gurus,
     option for error handling for DTP, ' no updata, no reporting" and "deactivated" , please give some explanation and instance for them?
Many Thanks,

On the Update tab page, specify how you want the system to respond to data records with errors:
                            a.      No update, no reporting (default)
If errors occur, the system terminates the update of the entire data package. The request is not released for reporting. However, the system continues to check the records.
                            b.      Update valid records, no reporting (request red)
This option allows you to update valid data. This data is only released for reporting after the administrator checks the incorrect records that have not been updated and manually releases the request by setting the overall status on the Status tab page in the monitor (QM action).
                            c.      Update valid records, reporting possible
Valid records can be reported immediately. Automatic follow-up actions, such as adjusting the aggregates, are also carried out.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_smehp1/helpdata/en/42/fbd598481e1a61e10000000a422035/content.htm
Hope it helps.
rgds, Ghuru

OSB - Error handling, report via service callout?

I'd like to use Report Action on any error happened in my services. I'd also like to keep only one Report Action to be able to change its configuration later easily if needed.
As it seems currently, if I add the Report Action to the Error Handler of the service directly, it logs the error code/reason/etc correctly, but if I move the Report Action to a separate service and add a service callout to the Error Handler instead of calling the Report Action directly, I lose the error information (I get the report message but error code/reason/details will be all NULL in the database).
Am I doing something wrong here? Is that a limitation of the product? Is there any solution to keep the report actions centralized in this case?
Thanks..

hi guys,
thanks for all the suggestions though it's still not working here. Hopefully clarifying the situation:
a) service -- error handler -- report error
b) service -- error handler -- service callout -- report error
a) works, b) does not.
The syndromes for not working is that the reported message has error code, reason and detail all empty (NULL if I look directly in the database). I suspect the problem is with my service callout in scenario b).
The service callout originally was made using the following parameters:
Request document variable: body
Response document variable: response
SOAP request header: header
SOAP response header: rheader
Reading your suggestions I tried to set the request document variable from 'body' to 'fault', but it did not help either: I get the report message but still no error information in the message.
How exactly should this service callout look like to properly transfer the error details to the called pipeline?

Latest Error Handling for Dynamic Actions

Is there any documentation on the Latest Error Handling for Dynamic Actions?

BillC,
Interesting that I was looking around for the same thing after seeing a Foreign Key violation in my application.
I found this article by Patrick Wolf:
APEX 4.1 – Error Handling Improvements – Part 1
http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com/apex-4-1-error-handling-improvements-part-1/
I believe you need to be on 4.1 or later though.
Thanks,
Joe

Error 'Handling unit was not blocked - action cancelled' for Packing

Hi Friends
I am trying to execute Functional Module HU_PACKING_AND_UNPACKING to Pack Sales Order Line Items in to HU.
But System is throwing unusual error Handling unit was not blocked - action cancelled
The Other SAP SDN thread advised to implement OSS Note 370195 , 331715.
The Input Code given in the Note 370195 SAP Developer can not find in our system.
SAP Note 331715 already implemented in our system.
Please help to resolve the issue for Packing Sales Order Line Items in to HU.
Thanks
SR

Refer OSS Note 370195 , 331715

Error Handling for Dynamic Actions (4.1.1)

Hello
I'm trying to create a function to handle all possible errors but the errors generated by DA are not being caught.
Is it possible to caught them? How?
My function is based in:
http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com/apex-4-1-error-handling-improvements-part-1/
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23903_01/doc/doc.41/e21676/apex_error.htm#autoId4
and I'm making my tests in apex.oracle.com
Thanks

Hi,
there is no APEX JS function which you could use to intercept the error display. But you might be able to overwrite the "window.alert" JS function which is used to show the error with your own implementation. This function could check the text for some patterns and then decide what to show to the user. I haven't tried this but
var originalAlert = window.alert;
window.alert = function( pMessage ) {
if ( pMessage ... some check comes here ... ) {
originalAlert( "My new message" );
} else {
originalAlert( pMessage );
};might work.
Regards
Patrick
My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
APEX Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

Error Handling in OSB

Hi,
In OSB how to catch all different errors and send them to specific
For ex:
1.if i get a "file not found" error, i need to send an email notification
2.if i get an arithmetic error , i need to send it to database
like any other errors...
Can we handle all those errors in a single error handler and send them to specific targets
let me know any questions

basically what is did is create a generic proxy service which will contain all the logic to handle your faults.
so in your case you could create a soap or xml proxy service (let's name it ErrorHospital).
the input of this proxy service needs to contain all the data you need to decide what to do with a certain error.
for now let's make the interface something like
<errorMetadata>
<error>{$fault}</error>
<payload>{$body}</payload>
</errorMetadata>you could just add me metadata from the proces which is failing ofcourse, it's up to you to decide what data you need.
now in for example the EmployeeService something fails.
In the EmployeeService you add a service error handler, and for the start in this service error handler we will only do a publish to our new 'ErrorHospital'.
Create the <errorMetadata> element in here and do the publish.
At this stage we have all the metadata available in our ErrorHospital proxy service, so we can execute all the logic needed for any specifica error.
In the ErrorHospital proxyservice you could add something like
if $body/errorMetadata/error/faultCode = 'MAIL-001' then send mail (by use of a mail transport business service (this expression won't work, but just to show what's possible)
in my blog i used a ErrorRepository in which i configure what actions to execute based on the errorCode
so you could add MAIL-001 in this repository and define something like
log_YN = Y
mail_YN = Y
report_YN =N
the generic logic in your errorHospital proxy service will contain a list of
if - then - else combinations to decide if it should mail, or if it should log or if it should report
and this will work on every errorCode you define in the ErrorRepository.
It's a solution we use at my current customer too and works pretty nice, and the administrators can update the ErrorRepository file from the console on production if they decide on a certain moment that they need logging on some errorCode for example
hope it's a bit clear like this

Accessing the original message body in Error handler

Hello everybody,
The loanGatewy3 proxy service in the OSB tutorial uses a stage in the request pipeline for validation. If a validation error occurs the error handler reports the original body message using a reporting action.
Now if an error happens inside the Routing node; and if an error handler is defined to report the original message ($body), the reporting action will report the error message not the original message. It seems that the $body variable contains the erroneous response instead of the original message. So is there a way to access the original request $body inside a node error handler?
Best regards,
Tarek

you can always put the original message into a dummy variable $origMessage, then in the event of an error report on $origMessage not $body
cheers
James

Hidden Report Viewer Confiugration Error on aspx pages that use report viewer web control

I try to fix the problem. The error below is embedded on aspx pages that use report viewer web control. Please note that the div element is hidden, and the reportviewer is displaying correct contents.
Div element hidden on aspx page
<div id="ReportViewer1_HttpHandlerMissingErrorMessage" style="border-color:Red;border-width:2px;border-style:Solid;padding:10px;display:none;font-size:.85em;">
<h2>
Report Viewer Configuration Error
</h2><p>The Report Viewer Web Control HTTP Handler has not been registered in the application's web.config file. Add <add verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type = "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" /> to the system.web/httpHandlers section of the web.config file, or add <add name="ReportViewerWebControlHandler" preCondition="integratedMode" verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type="Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" /> to the system.webServer/handlers section for Internet Information Services 7 or later.</p>
</div>
I tried adding the two elements to web.config, but to no avail.
Add below to system.web/httpHandlers
<add verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type = "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />
or add below to system.webServer/handlers for Internet Information Services 7 or later.
<add name="ReportViewerWebControlHandler" preCondition="integratedMode" verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type="Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />
The required assemblies below are installed under C:\Windows\assembly folder. I have installed both Microsoft ReportViewer 2010 Redistributable, and 2008 SP1.
Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, version 10
Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common, version 10
Below is the whole web.config:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<configuration>
<connectionStrings>
<add name="ApplicationServices" connectionString="data source=.\SQLEXPRESS;Integrated Security=SSPI;AttachDBFilename=|DataDirectory|\aspnetdb.mdf;User Instance=true" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
</connectionStrings>
<appSettings>
<add key="car" value="myCar" />

</appSettings>
<system.web>
<httpHandlers>
<add verb = "*" path = "Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type = "Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />

</httpHandlers>
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0">
<assemblies>
<add assembly="Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B03F5F7F11D50A3A" />
<add assembly="Microsoft.ReportViewer.Common, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B03F5F7F11D50A3A" />
<add assembly="Microsoft.Build.Framework, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B03F5F7F11D50A3A" />
<add assembly="System.Management, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=B03F5F7F11D50A3A" />
</assemblies>
<buildProviders>
<add extension=".rdlc" type="Microsoft.Reporting.RdlBuildProvider, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />
</buildProviders>
</compilation>
<authentication mode="Forms">
<forms loginUrl="~/Account/Login.aspx" timeout="2880" />
</authentication>
<membership>
<providers>
<clear />
<add name="AspNetSqlMembershipProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider" connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" enablePasswordRetrieval="false" enablePasswordReset="true" requiresQuestionAndAnswer="false" requiresUniqueEmail="false" maxInvalidPasswordAttempts="5" minRequiredPasswordLength="6" minRequiredNonalphanumericCharacters="0" passwordAttemptWindow="10" applicationName="/" />
</providers>
</membership>
<profile>
<providers>
<clear />
<add name="AspNetSqlProfileProvider" type="System.Web.Profile.SqlProfileProvider" connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" applicationName="/" />
</providers>
</profile>
<roleManager enabled="false">
<providers>
<clear />
<add name="AspNetSqlRoleProvider" type="System.Web.Security.SqlRoleProvider" connectionStringName="ApplicationServices" applicationName="/" />
<add name="AspNetWindowsTokenRoleProvider" type="System.Web.Security.WindowsTokenRoleProvider" applicationName="/" />
</providers>
</roleManager>
<pages>
<controls>
<add tagPrefix="ajaxToolkit" assembly="AjaxControlToolkit" namespace="AjaxControlToolkit" />
</controls>
</pages>
</system.web>
<system.webServer>
<modules runAllManagedModulesForAllRequests="true" />
<validation validateIntegratedModeConfiguration="false" />
<handlers>
<add name="ReportViewerWebControlHandler" preCondition="integratedMode" verb="*" path="Reserved.ReportViewerWebControl.axd" type="Microsoft.Reporting.WebForms.HttpHandler, Microsoft.ReportViewer.WebForms, Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a" />
</handlers>
<httpProtocol>
<customHeaders>
<remove name="X-Powered-By" />
</customHeaders>
</httpProtocol>
</system.webServer>
<system.serviceModel>
<bindings>
<basicHttpBinding>
<binding name="WebService1Soap" />
</basicHttpBinding>
</bindings>
<client>
<endpoint address="http://localhost:58269/WebService1.asmx" binding="basicHttpBinding"
bindingConfiguration="WebService1Soap" contract="ServiceReference1.WebService1Soap"
name="WebService1Soap" />
</client>
</system.serviceModel>
</configuration>
Any idea?
Update:
IIS is7.5, AppPool is Integrated.
I have tried below, none of them works:
1) Add it only to system.web\httpHanders. Changed AppPool to classic, still got hidden error.
2) Add it only to system.webServer\handlers. Integrated mode,still got hidden error.
3) Add both to both element. Integrated mode, still got hidden error.

Hi Kingofwebguru,
According to your description, when you use reportviewer control, you got the error message: The Report Viewer Web Control HTTP Handler has not been registered in the application's web.config file.
To troubleshoot the problem, please refer to the following steps:
Click Start, click Run, then type InetMgr.exe and click OK.
Click plus sign next to server name to expand it.
Click Application Pools in left pane.
In Application Pools list, click DefaultAppPool.
In the Actions pane, in Edit Application Pool section, click Edit Settings to check the Pipeline mode.
Configuration settings for the HTTP handlers are specified in the system.web/httpHandlers element and the system.webServer/handlers element. of your application Web.config file. The handler specified in system.web/httpHandler is used by Internet Information
Services (IIS) 6.0 or IIS 7.0 in Classic mode, whereas the handler specified in system.webServer/handlers is used by IIS 7.0 in Integrated mode. To use IIS 7.0 in Integrated mode, you must remove the HTTP handler in system.web/httpHandlers. Otherwise, IIS
will not run the application, but will display an error message instead.
For more information about Web.config Settings for ReportViewer, please refer to the following document:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms251661.aspx
If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
Thanks,
Wendy Fu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Wendy Fu
TechNet Community Support

Use of "Error Handling" Tab in InfoPackage Update Tab?

Hello All
I want to know the Use of "<b>Error Handling</b>" Tab in InfoPackage Update Tab?
Options in this tab are like
1.No Update,no reporting
2.Valid records update,no reporting(request red)
3.Valid records update,reporting possible(request green)
Terminate After No.Errors _________
4.No Aggregation Allowed
Will anyone tell about this in detail?
Many Thanks
balaji

Hi,
No update, no reporting (default):
If errors do occur, the update of the entire data packet is canceled. The request is not released for reporting. However, the records check continues.
Updating valid records, no reporting (request red) :
This option enables you to update valid data that is released for reporting only after the administrator has checked the incorrect, not updated records, and has manually released the request (by a QM action, meaning setting the Overall status on the tabstrip Status in the monitor).
Updating valid records, reporting possible :
The valid records can be reported on immediately. Automatic follow-up actions are also carried out, such as adjusting the aggregates.
With option a) the incorrect records are marked in red in the PSA maintenance. You can display the relevant error messages amodally, edit the records, and update the request manually. If it was not possible to write into the PSA (hierarchy or transfer method IDoc), an application log is written instead.
With options b) and c) a new request that is only read into the PSA is formed from the incorrect records. Here you can edit the records of the new request in the PSA and start the update manually.
For more information please refer the URL below.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw30b/helpdata/en/05/bb223905b61b0ae10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards,
K.Manikandan.

Sanity check: db error handling

I'm changing some code to return a better error on a record not being found. Whil I'm in there I find the error handling to be suspect:
                } finally {
                    resultSet.close();
            } finally {
                statement.close(); // etc, throws exception on any problem
        } catch(Throwable e) {
            e.printStackTrace();
            /* wrap and rethrows exception */
        }Catching Throwable is a red flag to me (anyone disagree) but I don't want to mess with that.
The thing that concerns me is that if there is an exception closing the DB resources, that exception will be reported to the client process as a failure even when the daa was successfully retrieved. Or that exception will mask the actual DB error. This isn't just academic becasue we are using Oracle, and I know that sometimes Oracle will throw an exception on close that amounts to "already closed" which is not an error in my book.
Does anyone have any good reason why the way it's being done shouldn't be messed with? I've never seen this approach and I want to be sure I'm not just missing something.

Aye, it seems reasonable to throw up any exceptions generated by the execution of your SQL statement to the caller, but maybe you just want to log and move on should you generate exceptions from your close calls. Should your pool get exhausted or your number of connections to your DB start to grow exponentially those logs would be worth looking at.
On a related note - is it reasonable to surround your base Servlet/Struts action class's "doSomeWork" method with a try/catch block that catches Exception (even though catching Exception throws up a red flag), on the position that you want to log anything that managed to get that far, and not show the user the ol' 500 code (though I think a specified error page would assist there as well). The assumption is that any "expected" Exception (if you'll permit me that oxymoron) would've been explicitly caught and handled by now, so this is something truly exceptional .
But then again, one could argue that if something that unexpected has occurred, you should make it blow up as big as possible 'cause you should have dealt with it. But then, I don't think it looks very professional to have that big blow up happen all over a user's browser.

Error handling on infopackage.

Hi experts,
I want to configure a ODS load to load the correct data and report the errors. I have set set the error handling to update valid records, reporting possible (request green) and create a error dtp.
Now i have one doubt, How do i have to set the set the error handling on the error dtp? And on the infopachage?
Thanks!!
Artur

Hi Artur......
U can do error handling using both DTP and infopackage.......but DTP is only for BI 7.0......
DTP :
In the Update Tab of the DTP............u will Find the Error Handling Field..........there u will get three options..:
a)No update, no reporting (default) >> If errors occur, the system terminates the update of the entire data package. The request is not released for reporting. The incorrect record is highlighted so that the error can be assigned to the data record.
The incorrect records are not written to the error stack since the request is terminated and has to be updated again in its entirety.
b)Update valid records, no reporting (request red) >> This option allows you to update valid data. This data is only released for reporting after the administrator checks the incorrect records that are not updated and manually releases the request (by a QM action, that is, setting the overall status on the Status tab page in the monitor).
The incorrect records are written to a separate error stack in which the records are edited and can be updated manually using an error DTP.
c)Update valid records, reporting possible >> Valid records can be reported immediately. Automatic follow-up actions, such as adjusting the aggregates, are also carried out.
The incorrect records are written to a separate error stack in which the records are edited and can be updated manually using an error DTP.
For ur requirement.............u hav to choose either option b or c.........
Now once loading is done........Click on the PSA icon............edit the value..........
Then in the Update Tab ..........U will Find the Create Error DTP option.............click on it..........create the Error DTP and load the edited records.........
Infopackage :
Check this........
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_bw30b/helpdata/en/05/bb223905b61b0ae10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards,
Debjani........

Error Handling for DSO

Hi all,
Is it not possible to give error handling options for DSO in Delta loads?
I have created a delta infopackage to load data from Order Line Item (2LIS_11_VAITM) into a DSO.
But the error handling gives only option 'No Update ,No reporting'.
I want to give the option 'Valid Records update, reporting possible (request green)' option.
Please let me know whether any setting needs to be done to make this option available.
Thanks in advance.
Meera

Check this help - self explanatory - trying checking F1 thats very informative and self explantory most of the times
Switched off
If an error occurs, the error is reported as a package error in the DTP monitor. The error is not assigned to the data record. The cross-reference tables for determining the data record numbers are not built; this results in faster processing.
The incorrect records are not written to the error stack since the request is terminated and has to be updated again in its entirety.
No update, no reporting (default)
If errors occur, the system terminates the update of the entire data package. The request is not released for reporting. The incorrect record is highlighted so that the error can be assigned to the data record.
The incorrect records are not written to the error stack since the request is terminated and has to be updated again in its entirety.
Update valid records, no reporting (request red)
This option allows you to update valid data. This data is only released for reporting after the administrator checks the incorrect records that are not updated and manually releases the request (by a QM action, that is, setting the overall status on the Status tab page in the monitor).
The incorrect records are written to a separate error stack in which the records are edited and can be updated manually using an error DTP.
Update valid records, reporting possible
Valid records can be reported immediately. Automatic follow-up actions, such as adjusting the aggregates, are also carried out.
The incorrect records are written to a separate error stack in which the records are edited and can be updated manually using an error DTP.

Reporting Action in Error handler

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for