Reports Greater Than 30 Days

I need to display the number of problem tickets that are more than 30 days open based on the date created. and calculate the number of open problem tickets more than 30 days. So far the formula I have is:
if {table.datecreated} > Date (30) Then
Sum ({table.status}, {table.itemnumber})
Am I on the right track? Any ideas? I am having trouble with the date functions in the formula workshop. The reading materials have all lead me to a dead end.
Thanks,
ITSteveSE

Hello,
please also see below some explanation plus samples from the CR Help (DateDiff) :
Basic and Crystal syntax.
Overloads
DateDiff (intervalType, startDateTime, endDateTime)
DateDiff (intervalType, startDateTime, endDateTime, firstDayOfWeek)
Arguments
intervalType is a String expression that is the interval of time you use to calculate the difference between startDateTime and endDateTime. Possible values can be:
Interval type value Description
yyyy
Year
q
Quarter
m
Month
y
Day of year
d
Day (both "y" and "d" find the difference in days)
w
Number of weeks between startDateTime and endDateTime
ww
Number of firstDayOfWeek's between startDateTime and endDateTime
h
Hour
n
Minute
s
Second
startDateTime is the first DateTime value used in calculating the difference.
endDateTime is the second DateTime value used in calculating the difference.
firstDayOfWeek is an optional constant specifying the first day of the week. If not specified, crSunday is assumed. See Day of Week constants.
Returns
A Number value.
Action
DateDiff returns a number of time intervals between two specified dates.
Examples
The following examples are applicable to both Basic and Crystal syntax:
Use DateDiff with the "d" or "y" interval type parameter to find the number of days between two dates:
DateDiff ("d", #10/7/1999#, #10/10/1999#)
Returns 3.
Use DateDiff with the "yyyy" interval type parameter to find the number of years difference between two dates. This use of DateDiff is the same as finding the difference between the year of endDateTime and the year of startDateTime.
DateDiff ("yyyy", #10/7/1999#, #2/10/2005#)
Returns 6.
DateDiff ("yyyy", #12/31/1999#, #1/1/2000#)
Returns 1 (a 1 year difference), even though there is only a 1 day difference between the dates.
DateDiff ("yyyy", #1/1/1999#, #12/31/1999#)
Returns 0 (a 0 year difference), even though there is a 364 day difference.
Suppose that for the above examples, the first date is the date that you bought a mutual fund, and the second date is the date you sold it. The mutual fund company must send you an annual report for every year in which you owned units in the fund. Thus, you would get 7, 2 and 1 annual reports respectively, in the above cases.
Use DateDiff with the "q" parameter to find the number of quarters (3 month periods) difference between two dates.
DateDiff ("q", #10/6/1999#, #5/20/2003#)
Returns 14.
DateDiff ("q", #3/31/1999#, #4/1/1999#)
Returns 1. The two dates are in adjacent quarters.
DateDiff ("q", #1/1/1999#, #3/31/1999#)
Returns 0. The two dates are in the same quarter.
Suppose the mutual fund company in the "yyyy" example mailed out quarterly reports. Then it would need to mail out 15, 2 and 1 quarterly reports respectively, in the above cases.
Use DateDiff with the "m" parameter to find the number of months difference between two dates.
DateDiff ("m", #3/15/1999#, #7/13/1999#)
Returns 4.
Use DateDiff with the "w" parameter to calculate the number of weeks between two dates. For example, if startDateTime is on a Tuesday, DateDiff counts the number of Tuesdays between startDateTime and endDateTime not including the initial Tuesday of startDateTime. Note however that it counts endDateTime if endDateTime is on a Tuesday.
DateDiff ("w", #10/19/1999#, #10/25/1999#)
Returns 0.
DateDiff ("w", #10/19/1999#, #10/26/1999#)
Returns 1.
Use DateDiff with the "ww" parameter to calculate the number of firstDayOfWeek's occurring between two dates. For the DateDiff function, the "ww" parameter is the only one that makes use of the firstDayOfWeek argument. It is ignored for all the other interval type parameters. For example, if firstDayOfWeek is crWednesday, it counts the number of Wednesday's between startDateTime and endDateTime. It does not count startDateTime even if startDateTime falls on a Wednesday, but it does count endDateTime if endDateTime falls on a Wednesday. For the examples, note that October 6, 13, 20 and 27 all fall on a Wednesday in 1999.
DateDiff ("ww", #10/5/1999#, #10/29/1999#, crWednesday)
Returns 4.
DateDiff ("ww", #10/6/1999#, #10/29/1999#, crWednesday)
Returns 3.
DateDiff ("ww", #10/5/1999#, #10/27/1999#, crWednesday)
Returns 4.
For example, suppose you want to calculate the number of days between the order date and ship date, excluding Saturdays and Sundays:
Rem Basic syntax
Dim d1, d2
d1 = {Orders.Order Date}
d2 = {Orders.Ship Date}
formula = DateDiff("d", d1, d2) - _
            DateDiff("ww", d1, d2, crSaturday) - _
            DateDiff("ww", d1, d2, crSunday)
//Crystal syntax
Local DateTimeVar d1 := {Orders.Order Date};
Local DateTimeVar d2 := {Orders.Ship Date};
DateDiff ("d", d1, d2) -
     DateDiff ("ww", d1, d2, crSaturday) -
     DateDiff ("ww", d1, d2, crSunday)

Similar Messages

  • Report data showing a date 1 day greater than selection formula end date

    Hi All,
       I have a report that contains the following selection:
    date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= date(minimum({?Date})) and date(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) <= date(maximum({?Date})) and dayofweek(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) in {?DayOfWeek} and
        time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) >= time({?Start Time}) and
        time(dateadd("h",-{Calendar.EstUTCOffset}, {tbl.TimeStamp})) < time({?End Time})
    When I view the report, if my date(maximum({?Date}))  is 5/1/2011, the report shows data for 5/2/2011. I can't seem to figure out why my report is generating data for a date that is 1 day greater than my end date.
    Any suggestions would be appreciated.
    Thank you in advance,

    No need to send SQL as dates are not in WHERE clause.
    It someting to do with the way crystal handles datetimes
    If you want to see dates up to an including 6/2/2011 if its a date time crystal will create a where caluse
    Datetimefield <= 6/3/2011 00:00:00
    Looks like when this is converted to date its stayin as 6/3/2011
    Sorry can't think of any solutions, also I live in UK so just about to leave, hopefully some one else may be able to offer a solution.
    Ian

  • CUIC reporting: handled calls greater than answered calls

    Hello,
    We met the following problem in Cisco Cuic reporting 8.5.4 for cisco UCCE 8.5.3.
    We use only the stock reports. In call type historical all fields we met a strange situation for a simple inbound script:
    - the numbers of handled calls is greater than the number of answered calls. This is vey unusual because any call
    is first answered and only after that is handled or not by the agent. So the handled condition supose to be first answered.
    Any ideas? What could be the cause for additional handled calls?
    Also we have problems between the number of handled calls in Agent Team historical all fields and the number of handled calls
    in Call type historical all fields. Should not be the same number in both reports ?
    The definitions for answered, handled, offered are very simple and they lack essential info in describing the situations
    they treat. The whole documentation for enterprise misses many times essential info and the only source of real
    info is others knowledge and experience.
    Any help is wellcome.
    Best regards,
    Marius

    Answered is incremented when the Agent picks up the call (or received the activity, in the case of EIM).
    Handled is incremented when the call (or EIM activity) completes.
    Handled will be incremented regardless of whether the call is transferred/conferenced/consulted or not.
    As others have mentioned, Answered and Handled counts can be incremented during different intervals depending on the length of the call. The only way I can think of where that would be the case here would be if your agents are handling EIM activities... They could have 5 open emails in their inbox at the end of the day - these 5 open emails would be considered Answered, but not Handled.
    If this isn't from non-voice activities, then perhaps you have some system issue causing the problem.
    -Jameson

  • Java.exe sizes  greater than 350M , web report  often error

    HI , friends
    My ie is 8,and webi4.0.
    the  web report  file(universe)  has 63 reports,hundreds formulas,
    open the report java.exe sizes  greater than 350M.
    every time edit report ,only edit fews formulas....then the edit does not work.
    and  edit Data Access,or refresh  ,then error:  An error has occured.....(Screenshot)
    only to log off ,and shut down IE ...
    After a while open the IE, Sign in web report... ...again...
    I set the RAM as a virtual hard disk,and set up IE explorer  buffer memory to the NEW hard disk,
    but error still exists.
    please help me , thanks.

    Hi,
    On Windows 7, you may set the Java maximum Java heap size to 1536 MB in Java Control Panel -> Java -> Java Runtime Environment Settings, Runtime paramaters for both User and System.
    -Xmx1536m -Xincgc
    Note that
    depending on the desktop OS, the maximum Java heap size could vary, you'd need to test it and find out the ceiling to that OS.
    -Xincgc is to enable incremental garbage collection instead of waiting for whole lot chunk of garbage to be collected.
    Hope this helps,
    Jin-Chong

  • Total of %db time column is greater than 100 in AWR report

    Hello,
    I have a query regarding "To 5 timed foreground events" section of AWR report.
    On many occassions I found that the sum of all the values in the %db time column as mentioned above is grater than 100.
    How can percentage be greater than 100?
    Event
    Waits
    Time(s)
    Avg wait (ms)
    % DB time
    Wait Class
    DB CPU
    29,212
    98.18
    latch: shared pool
    2,291
    286
    125
    0.96
    Concurrency
    direct path read
    147,998
    112
    1
    0.38
    User I/O
    library cache: mutex X
    4,831
    92
    19
    0.31
    Concurrency
    log file sync
    36,736
    72
    2
    0.24
    Commit
    In the above case the total comes up to just 100.07 % but I have seen reports where the total goes beyond 120 % -130 %.
    Can you explain why this happens, please?
    Thanks,
    Rushi

    Can someone explain above situation, please?

  • Showing the amper sign and greater than sign in a report

    Hi All,
    I am saving html code to the table and it saves exactly as I save it but when I display it I need to replace certain characters with other values so it shows as it was saved.
    <code>
    select replace(replace(replace(ACTION,'>','&gt;'),'<','&lt;'),chr(10),'<BR>') "Action"
    from test_table1
    </code>
    Example:
    the greater than sign I replace with an amper sign, gt;
    the less than sign I replace with an amper sign, lt;
    the chr(10) I replace with a BR tag.
    If I save the "amper sign, gt;" to the database what do I use to have it show an " amper sign, gt;" in my report column?
    Bill

    Bill,
    How about using the package
    DBMS_XMLGEN.convert(<<value>>, 0)
    when retreiving from the table and
    DBMS_XMLGEN.convert(<<value>>, 1)
    when saving to the database.
    This package will take care of all of your special characters.
    Denes Kubicek
    http://deneskubicek.blogspot.com/
    http://www.opal-consulting.de/training
    http://htmldb.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=31517:1
    -------------------------------------------------------------------

  • Aprroval for Invoice have due date greater than 100 days

    Hi all!
    I would like to create query to approve for Invoice have due date greater than 100 days.
    SELECT 'true' from OINV  where max(datediff(day, OINV.docduedate, getdate()))>100 and OINV.docstatus ='O' and  cardcode = $[$4.0.0] group by cardcode
    It's not working. Can you help me!
    Thanks!

    Hi Tien,
    Hopefully not trying to teach you how to suck eggs here, but it looks like the query is doing too much. There shouldn't be a need to perform a "GROUP BY" in a query to dictate if an approval is to be triggered or not, only the criterai to make it happen.
    For examle, the following code will send a transaction for approval if the customers code equals a specific reference.....
    SELECT 'TRUE' FROM ORDR T0 WHERE ${ORDR.CardCode} = 'ABC001'
    If you're wanting a query to just return a boolean answer based on the date criteria, you might want to try adapting your query to something like.......
    SELECT 'true' from OINV where max(datediff(day, ${OINV.docduedate}, getdate()))>100 and ${OINV.docstatus} ='O' and  cardcode = ${$4.0.0}
    (As an additional tip, in order to test a query that you're wanting to use as either a formatted search or approval type selection, when in the transaction, if you locate the relevant saved query under "Tools > Queries > User Queries" etc, where you have references to specific fields e.g. ${ORDR.CardCode}, this will pick up the values from the current record and give you a what if scenario. I tend to have just a "Temp" query I use for WIP type queries of this nature.)
    Note - You need to replace the bracket's "{}" with square ones, I've used the others as the forum posts as a http reference.
    Hope this helps!
    Julian

  • Greater than 90 Days

    Hi ,
       I have a characteristic ZMANUDATE.
       Basically, I need to provide a query whereby only materials which have been manufactured greater than 90 days ago
       Please advice

    Cheers Arun,
         My concern is if I was to offset by -90 , would this result
         1) show me all the machines which were produced at exactly 90 days ago
         2) show me all the machines which were produced from CURRENT DATE to 90 days ago.
          Option (2) is my requirement.
          Please advice if your proposition will still hold.

  • Need to create a workflow after Date Modified is greater than 7 days

    I'm using SharePoint Deisnger 2010 and attempting to create a workflow to generate an email after the Date Modified is greater than 7 days. Checking to see if there is a way to create this workflow without creating a "calculated" field with a date.
    Have:
    If Current Item:Modified is greater than Today
    But would like to have 7 days not today or a set date.
    What's the best way to do this?

    Hello,
    In addition to Bistech, here is link to set date in WF context variable.
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17082455/sharepoint-designer-2010-set-variable-today-x-days
    Hemendra:Yesterday is just a memory,Tomorrow we may never see
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help

  • Filtering Interactive Reports with Greater Than Less Than Operators

    The available filter operators in the interactive reports do not include greater than or less than. How is it possible to enable an application user to filter records where greater than or less then logic is needed?
    For example the user wants to query records where sysdate falls between a start and end date.
    Regards,
    Todd

    Ya know, that's all well and good ... BUT ... WHAT IF you do want to sort text type columns with Greater Than and Less Than operatiors??
    SQL does it just Fine ... so WHY does APEX have the limit??? This is an Oracle BUG ... it SHOULD NOT limit the operators ... I realize "they" may be trying to be helpful with proper constraints to field searches ... but ... if SQL can do it, then ... no need for a limit.
    EG ...
    Show the records where
    the "Begin_Year-Wk" data is less than or equal to "2009-09" AND
    the "End_Year-Wk" data is greater than or equal to "2009-04"
    ... to give everything that was running in that 5 week period whether or not it starts within that time frame
    I can run this query perfectly fine via SQL ... but not in APEX ... unless I reconvert a lot of strings back to numbers, and for sorting / formatting / explain-to-user purposes, I really don't want them to be numbers.
    So ... there's gotta be a hidden tweak for operators somewhere ...

  • Query to select values greater than, where AS clause is used

    Oracle 10g
    Requesting your help in writing the query correctly.
    I have the following 2 tables. The AddProjectPhase and AddProject tables. It is many to many relationship. Each project can have a predefined set of 4 different phases under it. Each phase has a start date and an end date. I am writing a report to get the phases which have a duration greater than, for example, 3 months.
    The query below is working fine to just display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase. I am not able to modify it to select the phases which have a duration, for example, 3 or more months.
    CREATE TABLE  "ADDPROJECT"
       (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
         "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PROJNAME" VARCHAR2(60),
         "PROJSTARTDATE" DATE,
         "PROJSTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PROJENDDATE" DATE,
         "PROJENDTYPE" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PROJENDREASON" VARCHAR2(1000),
         "UCPROJECTMANAGER" VARCHAR2(20),
         "FROMDATE" DATE,
         "TODATE" DATE,
         "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
         "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PARENTPROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
          CONSTRAINT "PK_B36" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJID", "PROJHIDDENDATE") ENABLE
    CREATE TABLE  "ADDPROJECTPHASE"
       (     "VERSIONNO" NUMBER(*,0),
         "PROJPHASEID" NUMBER(9,0),
         "PHASESTARTDATE" DATE,
         "PHASEENDDATE" DATE,
         "RRDATE" DATE,
         "PHASENAME" VARCHAR2(30),
         "PROJPHASESTATUS" VARCHAR2(20),
         "PROJID" VARCHAR2(20),
         "OPERATOR" VARCHAR2(20),
         "FROMDATE" DATE,
         "TODATE" DATE,
         "SRCHFIELD" VARCHAR2(20),
         "REVIEWCOMMENTS" VARCHAR2(1000),
         "PROJHIDDENDATE" VARCHAR2(20),
         "ISUEVALUATION" NUMBER(1,0),
         "SOLUTIONINGTEAMINVOLVEMENT" NUMBER(1,0),
         "ISUNAME" VARCHAR2(20),
          CONSTRAINT "PK_A63" PRIMARY KEY ("PROJPHASEID") ENABLE
       )Below is the query to display the list of all the phases along with the duration of each phase which is working fine.
    SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename",
    pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate",
    pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate",
    pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus",
    ap.projID "projID",
    ap.projName "projName",
    ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate",
    ap.projStartDate "projStartDate",
    CASE
        WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
        THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
        WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
        THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
        ELSE null
    END "phaseMonths"
    FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
    WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
    AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
    ORDER BY ap.projIDHowever the modified query shown below to select all the phases greater than, for example, 3 months, is resulting in
    ORA-00904: "PHASEMONTHS": invalid identifier SELECT pp.phaseName, pp.phaseStartDate, pp.phaseEndDate
    FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
    WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
    AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
    AND PhaseMonths IN
    (SELECT
    (CASE
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL
    THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
    ELSE null
    END) AS PhaseMonths
    FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
    WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
    AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate)
    ORDER BY ap.projID

    Looking for this?
    select *
       from (
            SELECT pp.phaseName "phasename"
              , pp.phaseStartDate "phaseStartDate"
              , pp.phaseEndDate "phaseEndDate"
              , pp.projPhaseStatus "projPhaseStatus"
              , ap.projID "projID"
              , ap.projName "projName"
              , ap.projHiddenDate "projHiddenDate"
              , ap.projStartDate "projStartDate"
              , CASE WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NOT NULL THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+pp.phaseEndDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                     WHEN pp.phaseEndDate IS NULL     THEN MONTHS_BETWEEN(1+sysDate,pp.phaseStartDate)
                     ELSE null
                END "phaseMonths"
              FROM AddProjectPhase pp, AddProject ap
             WHERE ap.projID = pp.projID
               AND ap.projHiddenDate = pp.projHiddenDate
             ORDER
                BY ap.projID
      where "phaseMonths" >= 3

  • Exchange 2010 SP2 RU2 - Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases

    We have been getting intermittent SCOM alarms for our Exchange 2010 MBX server citing "Indexing backlog reached a critical limit of 48 hours or the number of items in the retry queue is greater than 10000 for one or more databases"
    I see events in EventViewer that SCOM is triggering on, but not whats generating the events or how else to test for them.
        get-eventlog -computername SERVERNAME -logname "Application" -after "03/14/2013" | ?{$_.eventid -eq "5604"} | select MachineName,EventID,EntryType,Message | ft -autosize
    One MS Forum post online says it is a bug in RU4, unclear if it may also be a bug in RU2 (our installed version).
        http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/exchangesvradmin/thread/9dcb3011-9327-4935-9479-62b38a6ddd87
        "I was looking for the same error and found this.. it basically says that this is a bug in RU4 and RU4-v2...and it needs to be removed."
    tests using troubleshooting scripts find no issues with search indexer,
        [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>.\Troubleshoot-CI.ps1
        Get-EventLog : No matches found
        At C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts\CITSLibrary.ps1:622 char:40
        + $msftesqlCrashes = get-eventlog <<<< -computername $Server -after $StartTime -logname "Application" -source $msftesqlServiceName | where {$_.eventId
        -eq $msftesqlCrashEventId}
            + CategoryInfo : ObjectNotFound: (:) [Get-EventLog], ArgumentException
            + FullyQualifiedErrorId : GetEventLogNoEntriesFound,Microsoft.PowerShell.Commands.GetEventLogCommand
        Name IsDeadLocked CatalogStatusArray
        SERVERNAME False {DATABASENAME\SERVERNAME, DATABASENAME\S...
        [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>
    and tests against searches on each DB themselves show no issues and respond typically within 3 seconds.
        [PS] C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\scripts>Test-ExchangeSearch | ft Server, Database, ServerGuid, ResultFound, SearchTimeInSeconds, Error -AutoSize
        Server Database ServerGuid ResultFound SearchTimeInSeconds Error
        SERVERNAME DATABASENAME b16e3461-257c-40dd-a9ad-99a5f41a927e True 2.937
    I also tried to check the Performance Viewer for the MSExchange Search Indexer and MXExchange Search Indices but am unsure which of the many metrics would indicate this issue.
    We have had no reports of search issues from our users and have been unable to duplicate any impairment in our testing.
    Does anyone else have any suggestions for tests to check or steps to take on this alert? Is it simply a false alarm or a timeout of other sorts during testing? We have 80 DAGs on this server (as well as all our servers, some of which have also reported the
    same alert) and the Test-ExchangeSearch command times out before completely testing all DAGs.

    Hi IAMChrisL,
    Any updates?
    Frank Wang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Unit Testing  - Results greater than 0

    I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
    When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
    How can I do this?
    tom

    I am unit testing a PL/SQL function. The function has no inputs and one output (Interval Day to Second) . The output is the time it takes to run a query therefore a valid value for the output would be greater than 0.
    When I setup the test the result only takes a Interval Day to Second value. I want to be able to say any result greater than 0 is a success.
    How can I do this?
    tom

  • Storage bin Capacity utilization is greater than 100%

    Hi,
    Via LS03N, I can found that some capacity utilization is greater than 100%, this must be incorrect, what's the reason? is there any report to update the capacity utilization for storage bin?
    Kindly please advise.
    Thanks

    For the capacity checks, the remaining capacities or the used weight in the storage bin master data are updated with every putaway or picking. If you change the inspection method in the current operations or you change capacity or weight data of materials or storage unit types, you then need to make a comparison of the data. You can make this comparison with report RLS10200. First read the documentation before you start the report.

  • Error Message FF747  -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base

    Hello,
    We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction    FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the    FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
    We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
    We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
    Best Regards
    Amit  Kulkarni

    Hello
    This may be  a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like  this to be posted along with the expense item

Maybe you are looking for