Repository Subject Area with mutiple Facts that share a dimension

Hi,
I have repository model that has 2 fact tables that share a dimension. I'm trying to pull information from both fact tables and this dimension but get this error:
Error Code :OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request Club Products.Product Price. (HY000)
Thanks and Regards

It stands for Logical Table Source (LTS). See OBI Server Administration Guide manual.

Similar Messages

Not able to see all the subject areas with BI Author and BI Consumer roes

Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded to OBIEE 11G and we have created new users and assigned groups in the new 11G.
Generally users sholud be able to see all the dashboards and subject areas with the default BI Author and BI Consumer roles.
But in our 11G system users cannot see all the subject areas with the above groups, only if we give the BI Administrator role the they can see all the subject areas and dashboards.
We cannot give BI Administrator role to all the users....Please advise.
Thanks
Praveen.

Hi,
Check the application roles of BI Author and BI Consumer, they must be having BI Author and Consumer Groups. Check the privileges for Users and Application roles in Catalog manager for Dashboards and Check the Permissions for Users and Application in RPD for subject areas. Make necessary changes, restart BI server and Presentation services. Now users should be able to see dashboards and subject areas,
If it helped mark Helpful/Correct
Regards,
OBD

Not able to see all the subject areas with BI Author and BI Consumer roles

Hi All,
Recently we have upgraded to OBIEE 11G and we have created new users and assigned groups in the new 11G.
Generally users sholud be able to see all the dashboards and subject areas with the default BI Author and BI Consumer roles.
But in our 11G system users cannot see all the subject areas with the above groups, only if we give the BI Administrator role the they can see all the subject areas and dashboards.
We cannot give BI Administrator role to all the users....Please advise.
Thanks
Praveen.

Hi,
Check the application roles of BI Author and BI Consumer, they must be having BI Author and Consumer Groups. Check the privileges for Users and Application roles in Catalog manager for Dashboards and Check the Permissions for Users and Application in RPD for subject areas. Make necessary changes, restart BI server and Presentation services. Now users should be able to see dashboards and subject areas,
If it helped mark Helpful/Correct
Regards,
OBD

HT1937 my iphone 4s won't turn on. does it have to to with the fact that some glass it missing?

my iphone 4s won't turn on. does it have to to with the fact that some glass

ya think?

How to create Analysis from two different subject areas with diff models

Hello,
I have problem with create analysis from two different areas with two different models (Model Star and Snowflakes) build in BI Admin tools.
First Model A = Subject Area A have one fact tables (with measures) and three dimensions tables (Model Star)
Second Model B = Subject Area B have one fact table (no measures) and five dimensions tables (Model Snowflakes).
I'm looking solutions how I can give good results. In this case I can't use UNION, INTERSECT etc., because this models haven't the same number column and data type?
whether it is possible to do in OBIEE?
Please help me
Kind regard
robix

Hi
One thing to understand is that if your are imagining having two Subject Areas (SAs) displayed and then dragging columns from each into your Request without any preparation, then no, that can't be done. You would need to do a join in the BMM layer and expose the column from the second Subject Area in the presentation layer.
But if you indeed interested in UNION (or intersect) queries, then do this:
Build your first query in the first SA in the usual manner. Note the number of columns and the data types of each column.
Now at the bottom of the Criteria workspace, there is a button called "Combine with similar request." Click it.
Select your second SA. You will note that the outlines of the columns in your first query appear. This is to remind you that the number of columns in this second query must be the same as in the first. It also shows the data type of each column for the same reason.
Once you select your columns and your filters, click on result. (Oh, you will also need to decide what kind of combination you want -- click on the dropdown.) The result will be a new Request that has data from both SAs in the query and combined in the manner you select (union, intersect, etc.)
That should give you a start.
http://obiee101.blogspot.in/2010/08/obiee-combine-with-similar-request.html -- Read this link this is good one to understand with screen shots. -- OBIEE 10g
http://oraclebiee11g.blogspot.in/2011/01/querying-across-multiple-subject-areas.html -- OBIEE 11g
Award Points it is useful.
Thanks
satya

"AP Transactions" Subject Area hitting incorrect Fact table

Hi Gurus,
Requirement/Background:
We have done some customization to "Financials - AP Transactions" subject area i.e. adding 3 new W_DAY_D aliases in physical layer and few custom columns in W_AP_XACT_F.
I did not create any new BMM tables for new W_DAY_D aliases, just added these new tables in LTS (Fact_W_AP_XACT_F) under "Dim - AP Transaction Details", and put all the custom columns under same Logical table i.e."Dim - AP Transaction Details" mapping correctly to W_DAY_D and W_AP_XACT_F.
Problem Statement :
Whenever I add "Purchase Invoice Number" to the query, it hits incorrect fact table i.e.W_AP_AGING_INVOICE_A and gives incorrect results.
Expected Query : (if I select GL Account Number, Purchase Invoice Number & AP Amount)
select sum(T333486.AP_LOC_AMT * -1) as c1,
               sum(T333486.AP_DOC_AMT * T333486.GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE * -1) as c2,
               T333486.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM as c3,
               T334337.GL_ACCOUNT_NUM as c4
          from
               W_AP_XACT_F T333486 /* Fact_W_AP_XACT_F */ ,
               W_GL_ACCOUNT_D T334337 /* Dim_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D */
          where ( T333486.GL_ACCOUNT_WID = T334337.ROW_WID and T333486.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM = '1161/13 CH' and T333486.DELETE_FLG = 'N' )
          group by T333486.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM, T334337.GL_ACCOUNT_NUM
Current Query it is firing :
select sum(T333486.AP_LOC_AMT * -1) as c1,
               sum(T333486.AP_DOC_AMT * T333486.GLOBAL1_EXCHANGE_RATE * -1) as c2,
               T348360.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM as c3,
               T334337.GL_ACCOUNT_NUM as c4
          from
               W_AP_XACT_F T333486 /* Fact_W_AP_XACT_F */ ,
               W_GL_ACCOUNT_D T334337 /* Dim_W_GL_ACCOUNT_D */ ,
               W_SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_D T336997 /* Dim_W_SUPPLIER_ACCOUNT_D */ ,
               W_STATUS_D T338711 /* Dim_W_STATUS_D_Generic */ ,
               W_XACT_TYPE_D T338741 /* Dim_W_XACT_TYPE_D_Financials */ ,
               W_DAY_D T344857 /* Dim_W_DAY_D_Payment_Due_Date */ ,
               W_DAY_D T348434 /* Dim_W_DAY_D_Purchase Invoice Date */ ,
               W_DAY_D T351452 /* Dim_W_DAY_D_Purchase Invoice Cleared_Date */ ,
               W_PAYMENT_METHOD_D T394960 /* Dim_W_PAYMENT_METHOD_D_AP */ ,
               W_XACT_SOURCE_D T394984 /* Dim_W_XACT_SOURCE_D */ ,
               W_AP_AGING_INVOICE_A T348360 /* Fact_W_AP_AGING_INVOICE_A */
          where ( T333486.GL_ACCOUNT_WID = T334337.ROW_WID and T333486.SPLR_ACCT_WID = T336997.ROW_WID and T333486.DOC_TYPE_WID = T338741.ROW_WID and T333486.DOC_STATUS_WID = T338711.ROW_WID and T333486.INVOICED_ON_DT_WID = T348434.ROW_WID and T333486.PAY_METHOD_WID = T394960.ROW_WID and T333486.CLEARED_ON_DT_WID = T351452.ROW_WID and T333486.PAYMENT_DUE_DT_WID = T344857.ROW_WID and T333486.SOURCE_WID = T394984.ROW_WID and T333486.DELETE_FLG = 'N' and T344857.ROW_WID = T348360.PAYMENT_DUE_DT_WID and T336997.ROW_WID = T348360.SPLR_ACCT_WID and T338711.ROW_WID = T348360.DOC_STATUS_WID and T338741.ROW_WID = T348360.DOC_TYPE_WID and T348360.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM = '1161/13 CH' and T348360.PAYMENT_METHOD_WID = T394960.ROW_WID and T348360.INVOICED_ON_DT_WID = T348434.ROW_WID and T348360.CLEARED_ON_DT_WID = T351452.ROW_WID and T348360.SOURCE_WID = T394984.ROW_WID )
          group by T334337.GL_ACCOUNT_NUM, T348360.PURCH_INVOICE_NUM
"Purchase Invoice Number" is out-of-box present under "Dim - AP Transaction Details" and it is mapped to 4 tables including W_AP_XACT_F & W_AP_AGING_INVOICE_A. It is also set at Detail level in AP Transactions dimension hierarchy.
Additionally, implicit fact column has also been set. So why it is not hitting W_AP_XACT_F ???
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ravi Desai

You said that the Logical table Date- dim has 2 LTS (Date_dim, Event_closed_date_dim ).
How you defined this, is it something like
1) Drag table Date_dim
2) Select the column Row_wid of Event_closed_date_dim from Physical layer and drop on Row_wid of Logical tabl Date_dim
With this logical column Row_wid 2 sources. In this case you see 1 logical join between logical table day(with 2 LTS) and fact
If you followed this way should not have any issues.
Joins like:
PL-: Date_dim--->Fact<-- Event_closed_date_dim
BMM: Date->Fact
If you have any doubts, just create a new rpd with these table objects
Check your configuration.

I am incredibly angry right now with the fact that it has taken me 6 hours to try to fix a plug-in problem that Adobe will not discuss with me over the phone when I have photos that must be done TODAY with $4000 on the line to have the job done today.

I have never been so frustrated with a company and their inability to support me as a customer.
Even when I try to ask a question in the forums, it logs me out without ever posting my question- every time.
My PS5 will not allow me to run updates or manually install plug-ins to open CR2 files from a T3i.

SSprengel,
Your post appears as a reply to mine, but none of what you write applies to me.
You are way off base and I resent it. Please forgive the inevitable tone of what follows. No offense meant, I'm just pi$$ed off, that's all.
Let's see:
ssprengel wrote:
CS6 is still sold and supported by Adobe, right? They have released ACR 8.4 for both PS-CC and PS-CS6…
That's plain bull, and it has nothing to do with the OP's predicament. No need for me to go into the limited value of ACR 8.x and higher for CS6 users. Incidentally, the miserly pay received by those poor souls in Pune, Mumbai, or wherever they are in India should allow Adobe to extend their limited, pathetic support by substantially more than a few years
I have been told in no uncertain terms by Adobe and those close to Adobe, that I'm an Adobe former client.
That is patently offensive by the standards of any prudent person. My paid purchase of Photoshop CS6, is not that old. I had been an Adobe customer for very close to 30 years.
ssprengel wrote:
……From Adobe's perspective your $4000 job should allow you to buy new software and a new computer to run it on if your older computer isn't compatible with their new software…
That is unnecessarily condescending, offensive and wrong. $4,000 a month is substantially below half of what I was making before I became permanently disabled in 2005 and had to retire. If $4,000/month is all you're making, I'm sorry for you. That doesn't remotely allow you to project that onto me in a puerile and futile attempt to define me.
However, since 2005 I have not drawn a salary of any kind. Further details are none of your business.
The fact that there are people well off to be ripped off does not justify Adobe's predatory practices in any event.
For your information, Microsoft has been very supportive of my situation regarding my older Macs and has even provided replacement floppy drives for Mac MS Word 5.a (decades old) in the last 12 months and even provided workarounds for a six-year-old Entourage 2008 this current year. I run a number of Macs, including two Mac Pros and two Mac OS 9.2 machines.
ssprengel wrote:
…We pay quite a few thousands of dollars a year to use this software …, and we pay several thousand dollars a year extra because we are not using the current version. We…are willing to pay extra to keep the old version. We rarely call them for any help but that is their policy when their customers don't keep current with things.
MY point exactly.
I'm not in any sort of "problem" myself. I'm in the process of quickly learning and enormously enjoying my Photoshop substitute, the excellent 59€ PhotoLine. I was only expressing solidarity with the OP.

If I buy an ipod touch in America will there be any issues with the fact that I live in Ireland?

I want to buy an ipod touch in America as it will be cheaper but will there be any issues regarding charging it since I live in Ireland?

The iPod does not come with a wall charger, It comes with a cable that you connect to the iPod on one end and a USB port on the other. USB voltage is a standard 5 VDC nominal

Resolving loops in a star schema with 5 fact tables and 6 dimension tables

Hello
I have a star schema, ie 5 FACT tables and 7 dimension tables, All fact tables share the same dimension tables, some FACT tables share 3 dimesnsions, while other share 5 dimensions.
I did adopt the best practices, and as recommended in the book, I tried to resolve them using Context, as it is the recommended option to Alias in a star schema setting. The contexts are resolved, but I still have loops. I also cleared the Multiple SQL Statement for each context option, but no luck. I need to get this resoved ASAP

Hi Patil,
It is not clear what exactly is the problem. As a starting point you could set the context up so that it only covers the joins from fact to dimension.
Fact A, joins Dim 1, Dim 2, Dim 3, and Dim 4
Fact B, joins Dim 1, Dim 2, Dim 3, Dim 4 and Dim 5
Fact C, joins Dim 1, Dim 2, Dim 3, Dim 4 and Dim 6
Fact D, joins Dim 1, Dim 2, Dim 3, Dim 4 and Dim 7
Fact E, joins Dim 1, Dim 2, Dim 4 and Dim 6
If each of these are contexts are done and just cover the joins from fact to dim then you should be not get loops.
If you could lay out your joins like above then it may be possible to specify the contexts/aliases that should work.
Regards
Alan

Exporting sequence from Final Cut Pro 7, some clips are pixellated and bad quality, does this have anything to do with the fact that I changed those clips speed?

Hello,
Bit of a beginner using Final Cut Pro 7
Am currently trying to export a sequence using quicktime conversion. Sequence has various filters and effects over it and when I export it some of the clips are pixellated and appear to have not exported correctly. From what I can gather the affected clips have either been slowed down or made faster. I am wondering whether this is the reason they have not exported correctly
Any help would be appreciated
Cheers

More information needed.
Codec of material?
Sequence settings? (codec)
fwiw - do not use quicktime conversion. Use Export Quicktime with Current Settings enabled then do any format conversions in Compressor.
x

Filter on a dimension with a fact that don't depend on that dimension

Hi experts,
I have a logical column (fact1) that it is set as total for logical level for one dimension (dim1). (it doesn't depend on that dimension but i have to put it in a report next to that dimension).
If I don't filter the report the result is:
dim1 dim2 fact1
a x 1
a y 2
b z 3
b w 4
If I filter the dim1 on 'a' then the result is:
dim1 dim2 fact1
a x 1
a y 2
null z 3
null w 4
I don't want to see those 2 lines with null...
How can I achive that...
Thank you in advance...
Best regards
Nicolae Ancuta

Thank you for your post:
Here are the details:
Phisical layer:
Stores
Products
Suppliers
Stock joins with products and with stores
Purchase Price joins products, stores and suppliers
Sale price joins products and stores
Avg sale per day joins products and stores
BMM:
Dim Stores table
Dim Products table
Dim Suppliers table
Fact stock table with source Stock inner join Sale price inner join Avg sale per day
Fact stock table joins on logical level with Dim Stores and Dim Products
The source table stock has the following mapping on logical level:
detail on - Dim Stores table
detail on - Dim Products table
total on - Dim Suppliers table
Fact stock table has the following fact columns:
Fact stock column total on Dim Suppliers table
Fact sale price column total on Dim Suppliers table
Fact Avg sale per day column total on Dim Suppliers table
Fact Purchase Price table with source Purchase Price
Fact Purchase Price table joins on logical level with Dim Stores and Dim Products and Dim Suppliers
The source table Purchase Price has the following mapping on logical level:
detail on - Dim Stores table
detail on - Dim Products table
detail on - Dim Suppliers table
Fact Purchase Price table has one fact columns: Fact Purchase Price column
The report on Presentation:
Store | Product name | Supplier name | Fact purchase price column | Fact stock column | Fact sale price column | Fact Avg sale per day column
Store 1 | IBM server | IBM corporation | 1000$ | 10 pcs | 2000$ | 0.5 pcs
Store 1 | IBM laptop | IBM corporation | 500$ | 10 pcs | 1000$ | 0.5 pcs
Store 1 | DELL server | DELL corporation | 1500$ | 5 pcs | 2800$ | 0.2 pcs
Store 1 | DELL laptop | DELL corporation | 700$ | 5 pcs | 1200$ | 0.2 pcs
if I filter Supplier name with IBM corporation my results are:
Store 1 | IBM server | IBM corporation | 1000$ | 10 pcs | 2000$ | 0.5 pcs
Store 1 | IBM laptop | IBM corporation | 500$ | 10 pcs | 1000$ | 0.5 pcs
Store 1 | DELL server | null | null | 5 pcs | 2800$ | 0.2 pcs
Store 1 | DELL laptop | null | null | 5 pcs | 1200$ | 0.2 pcs
Regards
Nicolae Ancuta

Matching a filter value with mutiple fact columns

Hello,
I have been given following requirement to implement in OBIEE dashboard. There is a dimension table which stores Sales Rep IDs and their names. Fact table stores the Sales opportunities identified by these sales reps. Now they can work on the opportunity in any role...say as consultant or primary rep or some other role. Lets call it Role1, Role2 and Role3. The requirement is when user selects a Sales rep name in the filter; the dashboard should show all those opportunities on which he worked in any of the capacities i.e.Role1 or 2 or 3.
My Fact table has following columns
Role1_Sales_Rep_ID
Role2_Sales_Rep_ID
Role3_Sales_Rep_ID
The Dimension has
Sales_Rep_ID
Sales_rep_Name
I tries putting following condition ion physical layer join
Dim.Sales_Rep_ID = fact.Role1_Sales_Rep_ID
Or Dim.Sales_Rep_ID = fact.Role2_Sales_Rep_ID
Or Dim.Sales_Rep_ID = fact.Role3_Sales_Rep_ID
but the RPD gives an error saying that Dim.Sale_Rep_ID used more than once. Please help me solve this scenarion or please suggest any alternate solution.
Thanks,
Vivek.

Hi vivek,
but the RPD gives an error saying that Dim.Sale_Rep_ID used more than once. Please help me solve this scenarion or please suggest any alternate solution. Ya the joins should be established correctly to achieve your scenerio,i.e here oneto many joins sud be established for example
take the three fact tables role1,role2,role3 and the dimension table first click the dimension table and join it to role1 so it becomes 1:N the same way again click dimension table and click the role2 and repeat the process then you can achieve what you want.
Another simpler work around is take all the fact tables into single folder/table and the important columns for your requirment.Then now 1 fact and 1 dimension so its simple for you.
Hope it helps you.
Best Wishes,
Kranthi.

I cannot use itunes with windows 7. I think the problem has something to do with the fact that a 32 bit xp version was loaded on my machine. I can't uninstall it and the 64 bit version will not install.

I cannot use tunes with windows 7. A 32 bit xp version was loaded from my prior computer. It will not uninstall. The 64 bit version will noit install.

I cannot use tunes with windows 7. A 32 bit xp version was loaded from my prior computer. It will not uninstall. The 64 bit version will noit install.

Why won't any of my tracks from iTunes upload onto my iPhone? does it have anything to do with the fact that i had originally used it on a PC?

everytime i try to transfer music, nothing happens. when i drag the files over nothing
highlights to show that it accknowledges it. why? this is pretty frustrating.

See Empty/corrupt library after upgrade/crash.
tt2

How do use family share with two people that share one email?

I Just bought iPhoney wife has one & when I tried to add her to acct it said can't add someone with same email address

I Just bought iPhoney wife has one & when I tried to add her to acct it said can't add someone with same email address

Repository Subject Area with mutiple Facts that share a dimension

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for