Requests Limit in Access

Does anyone know if the amount of requests Access can handle at one time is 10 or not? Since Thurs., our web site has been crashing a lot and we think it might be from the amount of traffic we're getting and Access can't keep up, or that Access is limited to only 10 requests at a time. Is there a way to change this limit?
     We have 3 Access databases we're using with Cold Fusion. We're thinking that all the requests are adding up and Access just can't handle everything at once. Everyone within our company uses 2 of the databases and the 3rd one is our web site. Search engines seem to keep making requests to our web site all day long. When you add up all these requests, it's probably over 10 for sure at a time.
       Has anyone experienced this before? We've been told to switch over to SQL instead of Access. Hopefully this would solve everything and the server wouldn't crash anymore.
When I created my last database called, ECO Register, I remember creating it in Access 2007 and I saved it as .accdb extension, but I could not get connected to it in the Cold Fusion Administrator, so I made it .mdb instead. If our Access databases were the newer version, could that maybe handle more requests at one time? Or do we have to install a newer driver for Access on Cold Fusion to handle more requests? I did see in the Adminstrator page there is a Microsoft Access driver type and a Microsoft Access with Unicode driver type option. What are the differences? I see that we have an SQL driver type in the Administrator page. Do we have to do a lot of set up to make that work? Or do I just connect my Access database to that SQL driver and then update the pages to use SQL?
      If anyone could help me out, that would be great. Thanks.
Andy

We've been told to switch over to SQL instead of Access.
You should. Microsoft itself says Access is not designed for server use. Web applications are multi threaded. So when you incorportate a desktop application (which is not designed to handle concurrent users) weird things can start to happen. You should upgrade to SQL Server which is designed for use on servers. Not to mention it is much more powerful.
Or do I just connect my Access database to that SQL driver and then update the pages to use SQL?
No, you need to migrate your Access database to SQL Server first. If you do a search there are plenty of Access to SQL Server migration guides.
Message was edited by: -==cfSearching==-

Similar Messages

Azure SQL DB Basic Edition Preview: "Session Request Limit Reached" Stuck and Doesn't Clear - SQL DB Bug?

Edit: I have updated the below to reflect that it took four hours for the database to unblock. This looks like a bug to me. SQL Server seemed to believe there were 30 running sessions with open requests nearly four hours after the client
side connections were terminated (and thus in the process blocking SQL Server from accepting new connections).
Problem
I am running a preview "Basic" edition SQL DB and have hit a problem with Azure SQL DB blocking database access for an extended time period.
I was running a test, which was running normally for several hours (loading small batches of data), then suddenly lots of connection timeouts (error type 1 below). My workload was constant over the whole test - but if the server was suddenly under
pressure, I accept this might happen - no problem with me so far.
Upon retrying, the errors then changed to request limit exceeded (error type 2 below).
I am surprised I hit the limit in the first place, since the test code closes the SQL Connection on a timeout error and reopens. (In C#, the code is wrapped in a using{} to ensure prompt connection closure). Still, perhaps the amount of concurrent
work on the server did momentarily hit this limit. Perhaps fair enough on this point too.
BUT: Surprisingly, nearly four hours later, I was still unable to connect to the database - it was refusing new connections. Either from my worker role or from the Azure Management Website. The Management Window, upon trying to connect,
failed with exactly the same text as error type 2 below.
Further, sys.resource_stats (from the master db, which is still accessible) is reporting that there were 30 active sessions, 30 active workers (see extract below) for four afters after the test ended. Even though during this time period the Azure Cloud
Service that was generating the SQL requests was stopped too (so the client side of any open requests were long since dead). Also,
the CPU, Log Write and Phys Data Read columns in sys.resource_stats are all showing 0 for the four hours after the test ended. This to me suggests a fault condition that isn't clearing server-side.
Why was the database unavailable for four hours? Why did Azure believe that there were 30 open requests? (each request was an insert of 1000 rows, each of 400 bytes, i.e. pretty small so no way should they take this long to process).
PS. To be clear, none of the above is a complaint. I completely accept that the service in in preview, different SLA, etc. I am writing to a) check that I haven't missed anything and b) if this is a bug, to report it.
Appendix
Error Type 1
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.
Error Type 2
SqlException: Resource ID : 1. The request limit for the database is 30 and has been reached. See 'http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=267637' for assistance.
Metrics
The following is an extract from sys.resource_stats for the affected time period. SQL Server seems to wrongly believe/report that there are 30 pending requests between 6:20 and 10:45. It thus blocks any further requests during this time. There
were NO client connections during this time, either new or previously opened.
start time
end time
sku
session count
worker count
avg cpu
avg phys data read
avg log write
07 Jun 11:15
07 Jun 11:20
Basic
0
0
0
0
0
07 Jun 10:50
07 Jun 10:55
Basic
0
0
0.5
0
0
07 Jun 10:40
07 Jun 10:45
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 09:35
07 Jun 09:40
Basic
30
30
0.02
0
0
07 Jun 09:20
07 Jun 09:25
Basic
30
30
0
0
0
07 Jun 09:10
07 Jun 09:15
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 08:40
07 Jun 08:45
Basic
30
30
0
0
0
07 Jun 08:20
07 Jun 08:25
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 08:10
07 Jun 08:15
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 07:55
07 Jun 08:00
Basic
30
30
0
0
0
07 Jun 07:25
07 Jun 07:30
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 07:15
07 Jun 07:20
Basic
30
30
0
0
0
07 Jun 07:05
07 Jun 07:10
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 06:55
07 Jun 07:00
Basic
30
30
0
0
0
07 Jun 06:45
07 Jun 06:50
Basic
30
30
0.15
0
0
07 Jun 06:20
07 Jun 06:25
Basic
30
30
0.01
0
0
07 Jun 06:15
07 Jun 06:20
Basic
30
30
0.22
0
0
07 Jun 06:10
07 Jun 06:15
Basic
26
26
0.13
0
0
07 Jun 06:05
07 Jun 06:10
Basic
20
20
0.14
0
0
07 Jun 06:00
07 Jun 06:05
Basic
13
13
0.12
0
0
07 Jun 05:55
07 Jun 06:00
Basic
7
7
0.12
0
0
07 Jun 05:50
07 Jun 05:55
Basic
1
1
54.04
0
93.47
07 Jun 05:45
07 Jun 05:50
Basic
1
0
1.4
0
2.06
07 Jun 05:40
07 Jun 05:45
Basic
1
1
55.17
0
88.35
07 Jun 05:35
07 Jun 05:40
Basic
1
0
52.05
0
90.01
07 Jun 05:30
07 Jun 05:35
Basic
1
1
54.95
0
90.1
07 Jun 05:25
07 Jun 05:30
Basic
1
1
56.38
0
89.82
07 Jun 05:20
07 Jun 05:25
Basic
1
0
52.15
0
90.19
07 Jun 05:15
07 Jun 05:20
Basic
1
0
52.76
0
87.86

Hi Chris,
Thanks for testing the new Basic edition and for reporting this issue. Without some more investigation it is hard to tell what exactly has happened here.
To be able to take a closer look I would need some more information from you. Could you please reach out to me via email (firstname DOT lastname AT microsoft DOT com)? I will then let you know what additional information we and will kick-off
the investigation.
Thanks,
Jan

How to limit the access of a transaction

please provide hw to create an authorization object... like hw to limit the access of a particular userdefined trasaction to a particular user

hi
good
Element of the authorization concept.
Authorization objects allow you to define complex authorizations.
An authorization object groups together up to 10 authorization fields in an AND relationship in order to check whether a user is allowed to perform a certain action.
To pass an authorization test for an object, the user must satisfy the authorization check for each field in the object.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/671285439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
Basic form->
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT object
ID name1 FIELD f1
ID name2 FIELD f2
ID name10 FIELD f10.
Example
Check whether the user is authorized for a particular plant. In this case, the following authorization object applies:
Table OBJ : Definition of authorization object
M_EINF_WRK
ACTVT
WERKS
Here, M_EINF_WRK is the object name, whilst ACTVT and WERKS are authorization fields. For example, a user with the authorizations
M_EINF_WRK_BERECH1
ACTVT 01-03
WERKS 0001-0003 .
can display and change plants within the Purchasing and Materials Management areas.
Such a user would thus pass the checks
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0002'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' DUMMY
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '01':
but would fail the check
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_EINF_WRK'
    ID 'WERKS' FIELD '0005'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '04'.
To suppress unnecessary authorization checks or to carry out checks before the user has entered all the values, use DUMMY - as in this example. You can confirm the authorization later with another AUTHORITY-CHECK .
thanks
mrutyun

I would like to limit the access to my Macbook Pro to 15 minutes a day for my kids.

Hello
I would like to limit the access to my computer for my daughter to 15 minutes a day. It seems that parental control cannot have anything lower than 30 minutes.
Any idea how we can bring that down to 15 min?
Thanks

Oh, and get out the whip while you're at it!
Just kidding - I've no children so I don't use parental controls - but 15 minutes? That's just cruel!
Clinton

How can I do to limit the access to modify the materials texts?

Hello,
I need to limit the access to modify the texts of the materials from the transaction MM02. How can I do?
These texts (Basic Data Text) are on "Basic Data 1" view.
Thanks a lot, and best regards.
Carmen

Hello Carmen,
This can be achieved with limted authorization. Work with basis team.
Regards,
Arif Mansuri

My high school aged child is spending too much time on Facebook, Tumblr to the detriment of home work. Is there any way I can limit the access to these sites to between 8pm and 10pm?

My high school aged child is spending too much time on Facebook and Tumblr is there any way I can limit the access time on these sites to from 8pm to 10pm?

System Preferences>Parental Controls has time limits - check out this intro to Parental Controls from Cult of Mac on YouTube.
Clinton

Queued Request Limit (Stateless) -

I have stateless webservice calls setup and I am trying to trigger the Queued Request Limit (Stateless) limitation which is supported to be 5. However it seems that no matter how many concurrent sessions I kick off the calls simply queue up and do not trigger this exception. Does anyone have any insight on whether this limitation is not enforced?
Some more information: all the calls are using the same CRMOD service account, but they spawn off 2 sessions on the server. I kicked of 20 concurrent sessions which are sharing these 2 on the server.
Is it possible that this Queued Request Limit (Stateless) only kicks in if you are using different usernames?

Hi jeffry;
We have a "Feature Request" form where you can vote on popular existing ideas or add a new one of your own, limiting the responses is on the list for you to vote for:
https://adobeformscentral.com/?f=XnF-KJVCovcEVQz9tZHYPQ
We do not publish a road map of features at this point.
Thanks,
Josh

Limit infoset access in SQ01

Hi experts,
We created an infoset and assigned it to a user group. Then we assigned one user to this user group and yet other users can create queries using the user group and infoset.
How can we limit the access of other users not assigned on the user group?
Thank you.

Don't really understand your problem.
Do you mean that the infoset is assigned, say, to User group 1.
User A is asigned to User group1. User B is not.
User B can also make use of the infoset
Is that your problem?

Limit switch access (telnet, http)

Situation: c3750 Layer3 switch acting as router for my LAN, with several (more than 40) L3 virtual interfaces.
Target: I want to permit access to the switch only from some L3 interfaces (these with an @IP 10.255.x.x) and deny telnet/http request on other interfaces (with @IP 10.252.x.x). For telnet, I putted on the switch the following commands:
Switch(config)#access-list 101 permit ip any 10.255.0.0 0.0.255.255 log
Switch(config)#access-list 101 deny ip any any log
Switch(config-line)#access-class 101 in
Problem:
- telnet traffic is blocked on ALL interfaces
- if I try a telnet from a PC (10.255.10.100) to the switch (10.255.10.1) I see the following syslog message:
Aug 23 13:36:49: %SEC-6-IPACCESSLOGP: list 101 denied tcp 10.255.10.100(1709) -> 0.0.0.0(23), 1 packet
Why destination IP address is 0.0.0.0?
Second question: how can I activate the same filter on http access (ip http access-class accepts only standard access-lists, therefore I cannot check destination IP address)?

Giovanni,
You access list is producinging unintended results. You list actually says: "If you come from anywhere you can do ip to 10.255.0.0 0.0.255.255". What you probably want is the opposite. Standard access lists are most effective for restricting this type of access because it eliminates this confusion. You don't need extended lists to limit access to vty. The destination is irrelevant because the packet is not getting routed through. On this basis the standard list poses no limitation for your http access control. Standard lists are good for vty, http, snmp-server restrictions. As far as the 0.0.0.0 destination, I do not know why this was stripped out. Probably due to the fact that the packet is destined for the switch.
HTH
Pls rate if helpful!

How to delete i.e. clear the pending access requests list from Access request page in SharePoint 2013

Hi Team,
I am site collection admin of a SP13 site. The issue is we have added some of the users manually after we got requests from them for site access. But this has left those users as pending on Access requests page. We don't want that list to stack up.
I can not decline those requests as those users will be notified with declined mail. I searched for clearing the list of those pending requests but did't find any guidelines for this.
Is there any way I can do this. Any help is appreciated thanks in advance

You might consider using PowerShell to remove unwanted items from the "Access Requests" list of the web site. This list holds all of the access requests including pending, declined and approved. The following example demonstrates removing
the first item from the list. Please note, I'm not aware whether or not there are any negative side effects to removing items from this list so doing so would be at your own risk.
$web = get-spweb https://yoursharepointsite
$list = $web.lists["Access Requests"]
$list.items[0].delete()

Control/Limit web access

I am curious if I can use our 10.5 Server (currently serving afp and ftp) to also control the users web surfing. Ideally down to 1 hour a day minus the approved websites we maintain.

You can't limit web browsing to a time limit using 10.5 server, but you can limit the websites that users can visit. There is the capability to create white-lists and black-lists. I'm currently in the process of working with Apple in order to import our current 'hosts' file into workgroup manager's black-list preferences. Apparently the preferences are accessed using dscl from terminal...which really is not fun to tinker with. If I find a way to import sites into the black-list and/or white-list, I will post it. If anyone needs a really good hosts file that goes in the /etc/ folder to block most **** sites/proxies/crap, let me know and I can e-mail it to them.

How to limit file access for different users in 10.7.4 Server

We had everything working perfectly with an earlier version of Lion Server. The update to 10.7.3, or 4, seems to have opened access to all files for all users. Much to our surprise, this wide-open access started without warning.
- We have an external drive that contains all of the company's archives
- We had set access for one employee to get to the files he needs, and different access for another employee. Neither saw sharepoints outside of their access settings.
After an update, each employee can see and log in to all sharepoints. There doesn't seem to be a way to limit access for each employee now. I can set 'read' access for one employee, but it doesn't stop the other employee from accessing that sharepoint/folder.
Is there some new way to go about this? Or is something simply broken with the current release?

That is good to know. If the file share is seeing the drive and ignoring its permissions, that is why everyone can see everything. I have found, in Lion Server, that it is best to get the permissions set before turning on File Sharing. I don't know if you have the luxury of turning the file share off for a little while, but I would unshare the drive and see if the issue persists if you plug the external drive into another machine. The settings for permissions are set on the file or folder itself, so the issue should follow you to the other machine.
Again, if you can, I would unshare the drive and reshare it with the permissions that you want and turn file sharing back on. However, if you can get the drive to respect permissions rather than ignoring them, I think it will save you a lot of work.

Size limit of access database with image files stored outside database

I have read 2GB limit on size of Access database. We are using Access 2013 database with fields that are data type attachment and storing attached images outside the database. Does the size of the folder that is holding these images count
in any way toward 2GB size limit?

Hi,
As far as I know, Access database limit size 2GB based on itself, not related to the folder size. Attachment data
type is similar to attaching files to e-mail messages. We need to control the Access database size is smaller then 2GB.
When a field is defined with the attachment data type, you can store one or more files for each record in it.
Attachments can dramatically increase the size of the database, but since the attached file is stored as a part of the dabatbase, you are not dependent on network drives being available as you would be if you inculded a hyperlink to the file. As a matter of
fact, feel free to backup the origainal file to other disk after you attach it to the database.
Regards,
George Zhao
TechNet Community Support

Using Profile to limit resource access

Hello,
I'm trying to use the profile feature to limit access for specific users the featue I want to limit is:
CPU_PER_CALL defined as follow: Limits the amount of CPU time that can be consumed by any single database call in any session established by a user with this profile. The specified value is in hundredths of a second and applies to a parse, an execute, or a fetch call. These calls are implicitly performed by the database for any SQL statement executed in SQL*Plus and can be explicitly called from OCI, Java, or PL/SQL programs. When this limit is breached, the statement fails and is automatically rolled back, and an exception is raised.
My question is:
How can I from a SQL stmt, measure the number of cpu per call ? I cannot guess this value otherwise if wrong the SQL stmt will fail evry time!
I'm on 10g, windows server 2003
Thank for your help

You can see that information at sql_trace files.
Turn on traces in session using
SQL> alter session set sql_trace=true; --to current session
SQL> exec dbms_system.set_sql_trace_in_session(SID, SERIAL#, TRUE) -- to another session
After stmt executes make a plain text by tkprof tool
# tkprof xxx.trc xxx.txt explain=user/pass aggregate=no
The file xxx.txt mensures the CPU per call for stmts ... the option aggregate=no it's mandatory if you execute more than 1 binded sql statement
Regargs.
Marcio Paiva

Updated my itunes software as requested online, cannot access my songs?

Updated my existing itunes software on my laptop as requested online and now I cannot access my songs from any of the itunes files?
When I click on a song it says; the song " "could not be located because the original file could not be found.
How do I get my songs back?

I charged & tried a different USB and got the same thing, but figured out that if I plug it in and then open iTunes rather than the other way around it recognises the device. Go figure! The playcount still doesn't update though But thanks for your advice anyway!

Requests Limit in Access

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for