Resolution question

I am trying to create a sign that will be 24 inches by 72 inches when printed by a sign company.  I can't figure out how to send them what they need in terms of pixel inches with a requested resolution of at least 150 dpi.  I am starting with a scanned business card which is understandably a giant leap in terms of size.   Help!!!  and thanks. 

The text for your sign will be easy - if you use a Postscript font.  Postscript fonts - like Times, Times Roman, and Helvetica - are mathematically defined.  That means each letter isn't a collection of dots - which would lose their resolution when scaled up to perhaps a foot tall.  Instead, the letter "O" (to pick one at random) is defined by the mathematical formula for a circle.  Each letter has a different formula.  The net result is that they don't lose resolution when you scale them up.  I've printed individual letters ten inches tall using the Times font.  They looked sharp and crisp.
These scalable fonts are how desktop publishing got started.  At the beginning, you pretty much had to use the basic four postscript fonts - Times, Helvetica, Courier, and another whose name I've forgotten.  Now there are many more postscript fonts.  I know this because I owned a financial newsletter for 18 years.  We switched to desktop publishing in 1986 - four months after desktop publishing was announced.  I got started on Pagemaker (the first of the desktop publishing applications), and then switched to Adobe's InDesign.
As a computer fanatic, I was curious as to how the letters kept their resolution - even if you did something bizarre, like specifying that they should be printed at a font size of, say, 23.14.  The answer is this use of mathematical formulas for each letter.  When you scale up the formula for a circle (to go back to my letter "O"), you don't lose resolution.  That's how postscript works.
Basically, you aren't going to have a problem if you use a postscript font in your sign.  You are going to have problems if you want to include a picture on this sign.  There, the scaling is going to cause problems.
All that I've said is true if you work with a desktop publishing application or a word processing application.  I'm not sure what happens to Postscript fonts when you embed them into a picture.  I don't know if they remain Postscript fonts.  So be careful about using Elements to turn out the final product as a picture.
If you are thinking of having a sign printed, then you're probably already dealing with a commercial printer.  Talk to them and explain what you want to do.  They are the experts, and can tell you exactly what you need to do, the format you should use - and exactly how you should deliver the final product to them.
There are web sites that will license you very, very high-resolution pictures.  These would be, say, 20 megabytes.  Pictures like that could be scaled up without you having too many problems.

Similar Messages

  • Another resolution question.....sorry

    Thanks to Zac and Bogie for helping me out with the whole resolution questions but I do have one more....sorry. Do I need to log and capture in FCP in order to import the file into compressor to change the codec or is there another way? Maybe direct from the camera so it doesn;t get any more compressed than it is?
    Thanks again for putting up with me
    Rick

    If you shot on DV, for example, capturing it isn't compressing more. It is what it is. You shot it DV, it is DV. What's on the tape isn't "better" than what gets captured to your hard drive.
    Anyway, yes, you have to capture or ingest the footage or have some sort of existing movie file to put it into Compressor. You can't take it from the camera directly.

  • Replacement MBP; resolution questions

    My previous MBP (17" 2010-ish model) died a week or so back and I'm now in the process of looking into a replacement. I do have some questions I'd like someone to help me out on, all mostly resolution related.
    So the first few are related to old software:
    I have Photoshop/Premiere Pro CS5.5, which Adobe seems to have given me the finger over in regards to resolution compatability because it's not CS6 or above. Without having seen a Retina Display MBP running any CS5 software (and I'm unlikely ever to at this point) I'm unaware of how atrocious it supposidly looks running on such a machine. How bad/acceptable does it look on a Retina Display MBP? Slightly fuzzy or downright horrid?
    Are there any third party plugins or software to bring it Retina support? Same questions applied to Office 2011 and stuff like Google Chrome. How a Retina Display MBP treats my old software is the biggest deal breaker as to whether I simply buy a Retina Display or pre-Retina Display model. I'm not interested in upgrading to CS6 simply because Adobe clearly hates their older customers.
    Hardware:
    IF the answers to the above are "no" or "you'll have to upgrade your software" and I went ahead and acquired an older Macbook Pro, for this example a 2011-12 15" (even refurbished) model at a 1680x1050 resolution, how does this affect output to an external screen?
    Can the external screen display a 1920x1080/20 resolution on a system without a native 1920x1020 resolution like the 17" model did? Using the example machine's native resolution when using it by itself is not a problem for me, but not being able to get the desired external resolution when it's connected to another screen is.
    I'd very much appreciate it if someone could help me out here. I don't want to pay a ton of money for something that doesn't apply to the above.

    Your replacement came out of a warehouse not off the assembly line.
    Jim
    PowerBook G3 500 Mhz "Pismo"/ 2.0Ghz BlackBook 2GB OWC RAM   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

  • Image size and resolution question.

    Is an image at W 48.667 x H 32.444 inches at 72 res the same as an image that I could convert in photoshop to 300 res and then the with "Resample Image" clicked off would be W 11.68 x H 7.78 at 300 res for printing purposes? I'm asking this questions because after exporting 200 images from Lightroom 1.4, putting them into an wedding album I realized the images were not at 300 res but the first size listed above. I'm trying not to have to rebatch and have to put them back into the album. I sent the question to NAPP and got this back"
    "If you do the math you'll see that the answer is "no."
    48x72=3456 pixels; 32x72=2304 pixels
    11.68x300=3504 pixels; 7.78x300=2334 pixels."
    I did the math and it comes up to 5760 vs 5830. Pretty darn close. So would an image printed out with both settings print the about the same quality or am I missing something?
    Thanks
    Bob

    Bob's question is a common one. And one of the first that most of us struggled to understand. Let's see if I can shed some light to help clarify the matter.
    o The image starts out with a given number of pixels from the camera, scanner, or whatever was its source. The resolution only matters when it comes time to print the image.
    72 dpi was once a common resolution for displaying on a computer monitor. Today 90 dpi is more common monitor resolution.
    o Let's assume that the image is 3504 x 2336 pixels (which I got from his size @ 72 dpi).
    o In "image size", if you do _not_ have 'resample image' checked, all you are doing is _rescaling the image. The image resolution is whatever you enter ...
    For example, if you enter 360 dpi -- the native printing resolution of many Epson printers -- you get a print size of 9.733 x 6.489 inches
    o Let's say you want to print this image at 360 dpi in portrait on 13 x 19 inch paper with a one inch border on the sides. That would make the short dimension of the image 11 inches and the long would work out to 16.5.
    To do that you need to _resample_ the image to change the size. More pixels will be made. The resolution stays at 360 dpi. So check the 'resample image' box.
    After resampling to get the print size and resolution you want, the pixel dimension goes to 5960 x 3960 (from 3504 x 2336). Those new pixels came at a price, but that is a matter for another thread and a lot of personal bias.
    Hope that helped.
    P.S. The answer to your question, Bob, is yes. With resample off in PhotoShop, your original images should have gone to 11.68 x 7.787 inches @300 dpi.
    In looking at the rest of your original post, it seems that the export didn't work the way that you wanted. Do I read right that the images turned out to be 11.68 x 7.787 @ 72 dpi? Can't help with that as I don't do Lightroom.

  • IPhoto book - resolution questions

    What resolution should I use to scan in my printed 4x6 photos to get the best result from iPhoto book? Is 300 ppi sufficient, or should I use 400 or higher? Don't want to scan higher than needed since the files are quite large. Don't know what the resolution is of the printer used by Apple.
    Also, is it still the case that I should make sure photos are first cropped to 4x3 for best results? I have the latest version of iLife 5.
    Thanks for advice!
    Tara

    Jeff - thanks so much for your reply - very helpful. I'm scanning them all in at 600 dpi to give me options of printing some large.
    Another question - does anyone have experience with making photo albums from other programs/services? Are they all about the same in terms of quality? From the few I've checked out, they all look pretty much the same (as advertised) so I'm guessing they are using similar printers/processes and that quality would be about the same. In which case, I can go ahead and be confident that even though I will use iPhoto book because I am a die-hard Mac user and iPhoto is so easy to use, I'm not losing out on a better quality book that might be available through another software/service.
    Thanks again for advice - can't wait to make my first iPhoto album of pre-digital camera baby pics for my now 6-year old. I made one for my boss last year that came out great but all the pics came from digital cameras.
    Tara

  • IPhone resolution question

    Hi, i have some folios in the normal ipad resolution 1024x768 and i want to change now to iphone 5/6 resolution
    couple questions:
    - is 1136x640 the correct resolution for that?
    - how do you usually/whats the best way to resize/change resolution on each article to that resolution?
    Thanks

    If you create an 1136x640 folio, it will show up on iPhone 5 and later but not iPhone 4s and earlier.
    I think the easiest approach is to use the Alternate Layouts feature in InDesign. But keep in mind that the 1024x768 layout converted to an 1136x640 layout would most likely be too small for the iPhone. To maintain the same SD scale, consider creating an alternate layout that's 50% scale (568x384).
    See Digital Publishing Suite Help | Creating DPS content for iPhones.

  • Export resolution and camera resolution question

    I am thinking of buying a new camera- specifically one that will film video in widescreen as well as widescreen photo's. I have been looking at some that have a maximum video resolution of 848x480, which will come out fine.
    With iMovie, so far I have been using my wife's Casio camera which records video at 640x480 (4:3 ratio), and I have been cropping the video in iMovie and exporting as 640x360 widescreen. The next resolution up from 640x360 in iMovies export settings is 960x540.
    My question is, if my new camera has a video res of 848x480, when I export that in iMovie, will it have to be down-scaled to 640x360, or will there be an option to export at the same resolution (I don't think it will let me upscale it to 960x540)?
    Thanks.
    Message was edited by: wastedyuthe

    As long as you don't have "constrain" checked, it won't resample.

  • PXI 6224 linear position encoder resolution question

    Hello,
    I am using Quadrature Encoder connected to the counter 0 of NI PXI 6224. As shown in the picture, the decoder is working at X4 mode, I set Distance per Pulse as 2. The measured waveform looks like the resolution is 0.5.
    My question is:
                             Isn't the measurement resolution equal to Distance per Pulse?
    Thanks,
    JSI
    Attachments:
    couter0.jpg ‏50 KB
    display.jpg ‏311 KB

    It's a case of somewhat ambiguous terminology.  I've never been real happy with their choice of the term "pulse" for configuring quadrature encoders -- I would prefer a term like "cycle."
    The value you wire in should be the distance represented by 1 full quadrature cycle.  (Since this will be the distance from rising edge to rising edge on one of the quadrature signals, you can kinda see how someone decided to refer to that span as a "pulse.")   If you measure in X4 mode, you'll produce 4 increments of measurement per cycle.  That's why you see the 0.5 quantization when wiring a value of 2. 
    Generally, when I find such ambiguities in meanings of inputs, I run little test cases to help me figure out how things really work.  I've found this to be more reliable than counting on my memory. 
    -Kevin P.

  • Adjusting size and resolution question!

    I'm trying to adjust size/resolution of a collage that I created so that it will look good when printed on a 20 X 30 canvas.  How do I know the proper size and resolution to change it to?

    We don't even know what program you are referring to, so it will be impossible to advise. In any case, usage questions are best asked in the product specific forums.
    Mylenium

  • Image size related to screen resolution - Questions

    Trying hard to get my head around picture dimensions vs quality vs screen/printer resolution, can anyone confirm if what I think I understand is correct.
    My Canon RAW images are 3888 x 2592 pixels. If I export from LR a full sized JPEG (at 100% quality) I get an image that is 3888 x 2592 pixels in size. So the questions:
    1) If I open the JPEG in something simple like Windows Picture Viewer and hit the 'Actual Size' button then put simply is each pixel in the picture lighting up a pixel on the screen ?
    2) If I zoom out then presumably there are more picture pixels than screen pixels so some data is thrown away and there is some downsizing of the image ?
    3) If I zoom in then there is not enough data and there is some intrpolation to upsize the image ?
    What I'm actually trying to get to grips with is, if i want to post pics online or e-mail them, when to drop the quality a bit to save filespace and when to change image size.
    Cheers

    Downsample a LOT for email and quite a lot for web viewing. Not only might they not look as good as they should, people will not be happy waiting for a 3000+ pixel image to download to them.
    A "full width"
    Of course, if someone wants to print the photo, then you need to maintain the resolution and they should know it will take some time to download.
    If you want to see what size others use for the web and can't estimate by looking at it on your monitor in a browser, you can find out the dimensions of a picture you are viewing. In Firefox and windows, right click on the photo and select properties.
    flickr, for example, resizes to various sizes. Even though you can upload full size images to flickr, you might not want to do so to protect your full-size image from being used.

  • Video resolution question on retina

    I am sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find an answer.
    I am considering getting an iPod Touch 4. I realize the retina display will make almost everything look great, but I also want to watch movies or tv shows during lunch breaks. My question is this...if I want to encode my own DVDs (I do not have Blu-ray currently) how will they look on the retina display?
    It seems to me based on the specs that I would have to encode at 640x480 since DVD resolution is not "high resolution". Doesn't that essentially mean that on the 960x640 retina screen that the image will look slightly blurred or does it just get black bars around all sides of the video?

    They will look youtube videos, they aren't awesome as High Definition, but they aren't that bad.
    Hope it helps!

  • External monitor resolution question

    Hi and sorry for any dupliation of this question
    My main monitor is an Acer G246HL - it's 24" with a max resolution of 1920x1080. 
    Looking to run an external display mirroring the same as the master monitor. 
    So even if i buy a smaller screen-size, if the 2nd monitor (an Acer 21.5") is capable of
    1920x1080 resolution, i shouldn't have any problem with undistorted display on both
    monitors, right?  Hopefully so, since i ordered one.  (I'd be running one off the HDMI
    and one off the TBolt/MiniDisplayPort) Thanks for any clarification
    Mike

    Good to hear, wasn't sure if the fact the screen size was smaller would matter but thanks for confirming it'll work.
    Mike

  • HD monitor resolution question

    I bought an LG w2361V 23" monitor (full HD) for use with my MPB. I have it hooked up via mini to VGA adapter.
    The native resolution is 1920x1080, but at that setting (via Apple, System Preferences, Displays) the right 2 inches of the monitor are not used (i.e. a black bar). At 1680 x 1050 the entire monitor space is used. The problem with 1680 x 1050 is that (in Keynote anyway) things like pie charts look stretched in stead of circular. Why will it not work at the higher resolution? What can I do?
    Is there a monitor that works particularly well with Mac? (I don't want to pay the big bucks for an apple monitor).
    The monitor has VGA/DVI/HDMI inputs. Is there a mini to HDMI available for mac?
    Thanks
    bob

    OK, I have tried everything in
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2004318&start=0&tstart=0
    with no resolution. But I do know how to frame the question better.
    I am running Mac Book Pro 10.5.7 with a new external LGw2361v 23" monitor, native 1920x1080 60ghz over a mini to vga cable. The 1920x1080 has always appeared in apple's display utility, but when I choose it, I get a letter box screen image (i.e. two 1" black bars on each side or one 2" black bar on right). I would expect it to fill the entire screen.
    Any other ideas how to get rid of the letterbox?
    Is there a way to scale or stretch the image? I tried SwitchResX, but that did not resolve the problem.
    Thanks
    bob

  • IMac 24 inch resolution question

    Hi there,
    I'm considering buying a new iMac and can't quite decide which one to get. Basically I might (very occasionally) want to boot into windows (through Bootcamp) and play a few of the games I've collected. I know the iMac's not great for gaming but it would be nice if it could run reasonably (I'm using a 3 year old laptop at the moment so my expectations aren't that high)
    Basically although I really like the look of the 24 inch screen I'm worried that the extra screen size might push games from "just about playable if it's not that new" to completely impossible at the native resolution. So, which resolutions can I select (in Mac OS X and in Windows) using a 24 inch iMac? I've searched far and wide but can't find any reliable information about this. Does the 24 inch iMac support the 1680x1050 resolution that the 20 inch version does? (I'm guessing maybe not, since the 23 inch cinema display doesn't, but it's obviously a completely different piece of hardware so I've no idea really) Which other resolutions? Is there any difference between the options in Mac OS X and in Windows?
    Secondly, on my laptop at the moment in the display settings (in Windows for the Ati video card) I can choose to disable "panel scaling" - this means that if I run in a resolution below the native resolution it only fills the centre of the screen rather than the whole of the screen. This avoids the blurry image problem that you get from running at a less-than-native resolution on a flatscreen (obviously at the expense of a smaller picture)
    Does Mac OS X support a similar feature? Would I be able to run in, say, 1680x1050 or 1280x800 and only use the centre of the screen or could it only be stretched to fill the whole screen? Finally would this work in Windows on the iMac as well? (It's dependant on the graphics card driver and I don't know what Apple's windows drivers behave like)
    Sorry for the mountain of questions but I can't find any information about this at all - it would be really really good if someone with a new 24 inch iMac could have a look and see what choices there are!
    Many thanks,
    Matt

    Hi Russell,
    According to various internet sites, the chipsets in two cards available for the 24 inch iMac, the Geforce 7300 GT and Geforce 7600 GT, both support "floating point texture". I can't find any specific references to the implementation in the Apple 24 inch iMac Intel, but I would doubt it is delibrately removed.
    So, what good that actually does you is anyone's guess, but yes, it seems to be in there.

  • Picture resolution question - newbie

    Hello,
    I am making a 10 feet by 10 feet (8640 x 8640 pixels) panel. I am using a stock photo that is 4360 x 2912 pixels. I will of course make the picture bigger to fit the panel. My question is: How will the picture look when I have the panel printed at a professional printer? Will it be pixelated?
    Thanks for your help.
    L.

    >I am making a 10 feet by 10 feet (8640 x 8640 pixels)
    10 feet by 10 feet is one thing. 8640 pixels is another and they have nothing to do with one another.
    >The stock picture is 4368x2912 pixels and is at 300 dpi.
    "300 dpi" is incorrect. Image resolution is measured in ppi for Pixels Per Inch. But 300 ppi is also incorrect because the output size is not 14.6 x 9.7 inches, but 120 x 120 inches. Assuming you crop off some of the sides, the final image resolution will be 24.26 ppi. That's pretty low for your purposes. Try to get a higher resolution source. If you can't, then you should explore plug-ins for Photoshop that resample to higher resolution. Genuine Fractals is the one I am familiar with.

  • Flash - how is the HD support - and HUGE image resolution question

    Hello Flash Forums,
    It's been a while since I posted, but I would love to get some information from some of the old pros on here as to best practices using flash for large scale environmental displays:
    1. Flash supports High Definition correct? I did a google search, and see that it does - but unsure whether I need a plug-in or it's just a setting? My question is more along the lines of - can the flash animation be highDef, or only the videos it displays?
    2. I am working on a very large (like 40ft tall) environmental graphic, and curious if anyone can tell me how you deal with images at that size? I remember vaugely, that they don't need to be 300dpi, but do i still need to maintain a certain resolution?
    Thanks for any help you can provide~!
    B

    Any limiting factors you'll be dealing with are likely more to do with what will actually be running/playing your Flash content and feeding that to this display. Whoever is responsible for setting up the computer system that displays this could answer that. Find out the resolution of their display set up. It will probably be a projection setup, that shows whatever media at a blown-up size. Ask them if 1080 HD video will work, and if they have used that before, and how did it look, etc.
    If the display ends up having a resolution of something significantly higher than what a graphic designer's "high" resolution monitor is, you don't necessarily have to have your Flash showing at 100% and fill all those pixels. You can have good results creating your Flash at a reasonale width & height, and then scaling that to 150%, 200%, etc.
    Flash has no problems dispalying 1080 HD video, and nothing is needed other than the Flash plugin. There continue to be Flash Player updates for improved video support, so be sure you get the latest version installed on whatever computer is playing this. YouTube started showing full HD size (1080) a while ago, and so you can always refer to that site to see how smooth the videos are.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Is there a way to Hide data from Users in Cubes?

    Hello All, Is there a way that I can easily hide data from users. For instance, in the XYZ cube we have data loaded through the year 2005. Is there a way for me to still keep the data in the cube; however, just hide 2005 so when users go in they do n

  • Premier Elements wont open or work on Windows 8 64bit operating system.

    I have a windows 8 64 bit operating system. I have Adobe Photoshop Elements 12 and Adobe Premier Elements 12 and downloaded the 64bit operating software.  This is the 2nd computer I've installed the software on as I upgraded to a better computer. Pho

  • CONTROL_FORM is invalid, START_FORM is missing

    Hi all, I understand that this had been asked many times. But somehow, I really cannot figure out what is not right here. Please help. Below are my steps how to do call function OPEN_FORM, START_FORM...END_FORM and CLOSE_FORM. There is a LOOP after t

  • Wage type characteristics variation in Dev and PRD system

    Hi All, We have a wage type for ex: 9501, We will be entering the WT in infotype 15 and the in the payslip it will be in payments section. When I enter value 50 in DEV system, it is showing 50 in payslip under payments section but in PRD system the s

  • Dragging photo albums into iWeb

    Hi. I'm trying to drag an iPhoto album into a albums page on iWeb but its not working. I've done this in the past and its worked fine so i know what to do, but it's just not working! Please help.