Restricting Multiple Users To Only Their Specific Areas Of A Site

I think I understand the basics of user authentication and
password protection for areas of a site using PHP/MySQL, etc. Maybe
I don't however.
My question is: If I have 10 users how do I restrict each
user to only their specific pages in the site so that they can only
see their specific pages and not every protected page?
See, maybe I don't understand, but any help would be
appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Glenn Atkins

Can you password-protect individual folders, each containing
only a single
user's pages?
"GEAtkins" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fj4gel$1sh$[email protected]..
>I think I understand the basics of user authentication
and password
>protection
> for areas of a site using PHP/MySQL, etc. Maybe I don't
however.
>
> My question is: If I have 10 users how do I restrict
each user to only
> their
> specific pages in the site so that they can only see
their specific pages
> and
> not every protected page?
>
> See, maybe I don't understand, but any help would be
appreciated. Thanks
> in
> advance.
>
> Glenn Atkins
>

Similar Messages

Is there any query to know the multiple users name from their ids?

is there any query to know the multiple users name from their ids?

Hi,
Goto TCode SUIM  Select Users  Select Users by Address Data
It will give you the users list
Regards,
Sankaran

How to restrict the user id to a specific company code?

Hi,
I want to restrict a user id to access a specific company code only for both customizing and application data creation. This means that the user id can do customizing and create application data for that company code only and not for any other company codes.
how can i do this?

Hello Raja,
You requirement of restricting users for application data can solved by adding the company code in the organization level button and the user will be restricted to mainatin application (transaction) data for the org element for which he is authorized for, if the transaction has objects which check company code.
Customizing data authorization can be very tricky, as most of the customizing transactions are for maintaining customizing tables will not necessarily have an authorization check for org elements. In this case you may to manually insert a object called S_TABU_LIN alongwith S_TABU_DIS it will perform the job of restricting authorizations.
In cases where the end user is accessing tables directly with SE16 S_TABU_DIS is the object that is check and maintained in PFCG.But,Such a restriction cannot be made with S_TABU_DIS alone. Fortunately SAP provides us with another authorization object S_TABU_LIN (Authorization for Organizational Unit), which can be used in conjunction with S_TABU_DIS to enforce such a restriction.
This authorization object works only with Maintenance Views and Customizing tables. Also note that an Organization Criterion is a prerequisite for implementing the same
A detailed step by step procedure to be followed is given below:
1. The first step in implementation of line authorization is defining an Organization Criterion. For this we need to access the u201CSAP Reference IMGu201D customization page from SPRO transaction.
2. From the IMG display screen select SAP Web Application Server -> System Administration -> Users and Authorizations -> Line Oriented Authorizations. Select the execute ( ) button for the u201CDefine Organization Criteriau201D.
3. The resulting table display show all available Org Criteria values existing in the system. For our purposes we will create a new Org Criteria to suit our needs. Select the tab u201CNew Entriesu201D as shown below.
4. Give an appropriate name starting with Y or Z for the new value. Note that a name starting with another letter will not be accepted by the SAP system. Click on u2018Saveu2019 button to save the newly created Org Criteria. This opens a new window asking for a Workbench Transport Request. This would be required so as to transport the new Line authorization restrictions further to the test and production systems.
5. Now select the new Org Criterion u201CY_TESTu201D and double-click the u201CAttributesu201D tab as below to define the various Org Attributes.
6. Provide the new Attribute name and Description for the same. Also fill the Authorization field value from the provided dropdown (1st Org Criterion Attribute u2026. 8th Org Criterion Attribute). The search help field is an optional field which can be filled if a search criterion exists or has been created earlier for the specific purpose. This field enables the u201CF4u201D when filling entries in the authorization object
7. We already have a search help (C_T001) available, which provides as an F4 help the list of all available Company Codes in the system.
Note that we can create up to 8 Org Attributes as per our requirements (by selecting u201CNew Entriesu201D tab), each corresponding to a column in the target table.
8. Selecting the attributes link again will show us a list of all defined attributes and the authorization Field it will appear in. Now that we have defined the Attribute Field that we require, we need to associate each attribute to the corresponding Table Field in the target table.
Select one of the attributes as below and double-click on the u201CTable Fieldsu201D button to define the field associations.
9. Select the u201CNew Entriesu201D tab to create a new table field association.
10. The View/table field must be filled with the target table which we need to control.
11. The u201CField Nameu201D will require the field name of the target table which be linked with the specific Org Attribute. Performing an F4 on this field will display the list of all possible fields available in the View/table provided earlier. Here we will select the field name BUKRS (Company Code). Save the entries in the same workbench request created earlier.
12. The next step would be to activate this new Org Criterion so that SAP now checks the authorization for S_TABU_LIN for every user
13. In the u2018IMG displayu2019 go to SAP Web Application Server -> System Administration -> Users and Authorizations -> Line Oriented Authorizations. Select execute ( ) button for the u201CActivate Organization Criteriau201D.
14. From the resulting customization screen tick the check-box for the Org Criterion that we have created. On saving the settings the system then asks for a Customizing Transport Request for further transport into test and development systems.
15. Any user without this authorization will not be allowed in to the SM30 display/change screen for this table.
16. In the role for which the S_TABU_DIS provides maintenance access for the table , we will now also need to maintain the object S_TABU_LIN.
17. On selecting change button besides any authorization field you will need to select the Organization criterion which needs to be maintained here. Note that only one Org Criterion can be maintained in one instance of S_TABU_LIN object.

Users accessing only their applications

27-Jun-12
Good Morning,
We're running WebLogic Server Version: 10.3.4.0. We have numerous users as well as numerous applications. Is it possible to set up the users so they only have access to their respective applications? We'd like to avoid a user inadvertently deploying a file to the wrong application, or worse, inadvertently deleting the wrong application.
Thanks for your time and consideration!

Hi
Do you mean from Deployment Point of View like for Adminstrators. Each Admin can deploy/undeploy only his or her application. I doubt if this is possible. You can control admin privileges at high level and at specific areas. There are Groups like Monitors, Deployers etc. Monitors groups means users in this group can only get READ ONLY access to full admin console. They cannot do anything else. Deployers can do only deployment. BUT you cannot control specific applications to be deployed by specific admin user. If this is your exact requirment, I really doubt this may not be possible.
From the end user point of view, they can only access the applcations. They cannot deploy/undeploy or modify any files. Your first lines of question were little confusing.
Thanks
Ravi Jegga

How to restrict lync user to change their presence

Is it possible to restrict users to set their presence manually in Lync client.
Some user in organization manually change their presence which is very panic some time

Yes, you can get it from the back end database. Take a look here:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/dodeitte/archive/2011/05/11/how-to-get-the-last-time-a-user-registered-with-a-front-end.aspx
and
http://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/office/List-last-time-a-User-b905cf5f
If this helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer"
Georg Thomas | Lync MVP
Blog www.lynced.com.au | Twitter
@georgathomas
Lync Edge Port Check (Beta)
This forum post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

In Profile Manager, Can I assign users to ONLY a specific Device Group?

In profile Manager (Lion Server 10.7.3) I created DEVICE GROUPS per Lab, and each Lab has a manager. I want to give each manager permissions to see and manage ONLY their devices. Is this possible?

I'm not sure this was ever designed to be user friendly as typically only Admins or those with elevated permissions would see these groups. There isn't as far as I can see, any way to add this step within a Wokflow too, unless you're able to install
some third party steps.
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

Oracle Workflow Notification to multiple users but only one response required

Hi,
I'd like to ask help on how I would go about this. I have a requirement using Oracle Workflow. Initially the workflow sends a notification with the option to Accept or Reject to a group of people, then if one accepts I should end the process. But if all rejects, then send a notification to the Manager.
I used a Loop Timer to loop through the members of the group but I noticed that one needs to reply before the next one gets notified and so on.
I thought of using adhoc role then adding all members to this role. But not sure how to catch if one accepts or all rejects.
Appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Allen

Hi
We have a similar situation and every level has multiple user to release the PO. I have tried with all possibilities using standard functionality but no good.
Would you mind to share the design and the process will be great help.
Thnaks
Partha

Restrict multiple users

Hi Friends,
Ours is OLAP system (10g Rel 2) . I have a package where in I populate a core table based on many working tables. I query the 4 working tables using a ref cursor and populate the data into an associative array and then looping through this array I populate the core table. Every time when I run this package I truncate the core table and repopulate it with the new data.
Actually this package should run for a single user and multiple users cannot run this. But even if multiple users run, it should not affect the data getting populated into the core table.
How do we handle this? Does Oracle internally handle this if multiple users run the same package??
Thanks
Zara

user523372 wrote:
Hi Friends,
Ours is OLAP system (10g Rel 2) . I have a package where in I populate a core table based on many working tables. I query the 4 working tables using a ref cursor and populate the data into an associative array and then looping through this array I populate the core table. Every time when I run this package I truncate the core table and repopulate it with the new data.
Actually this package should run for a single user and multiple users cannot run this. But even if multiple users run, it should not affect the data getting populated into the core table.
How do we handle this? Does Oracle internally handle this if multiple users run the same package??
Thanks
ZaraIf this "core table" were a Global Temporary Table, you would have the desired characteristics.
Any regular table does not do as desired.
BTW - On the surface this sound like a non-scalable, inefficient, & brute force implementation.
Edited by: sb92075 on Jul 5, 2011 4:28 PM

Multiple user folders, only one user account

Hello everyone,
I recently had to reformat my Macbook and reinstall. In the Macintosh HD/users folder are three folders: one with an icon of a little house with my computer's short name, another called Shared and another with my first and last name.
In System Preferences/Accounts, I only have one user. Whenever I use the finder to drag and drop a file into, say, Movies, it drags it into the second user folder ie. not the one with the little house icon. Consequently, Front Row cannot find my avi's and iTunes cannot find my music.
While I can (and have) simply transfer all my files from one folder to another, it doesn't explain where this extra user came from and why it seems to have control over the Pictures, Movies and Music folders on the left hand side in Finder while the account that I'm logged in on is somehow secondary.
I really don't want to have to reformat my machine again. How do I delete this second user safely? Where did it come from?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks a million
Dave

Some ways that you can end up with extra user folders are:
You migrated data from an older computer using the migration assistant or target disk mode.
If that is not the case then what has happened is that you done an archive and install not preserving user and network settings but then that folder should be located in a previous system folder.
The most likely scenario, is however, that you somehow managed to rename your home folder.
When that happens and you restart your computer the system will look for a folder with your username, that name on your computer, is the name on the folder that has the home icon.
If a folder with that name is not found a new user folder will be created, it will however, not contain any of your current data files.
Open the folder which does not have the home icon and check for your user data.
If it contains your user data you need to rename it back to the name of the home folder with the icon.
It is not that simple though since you can't have 2 folders with the same name.
So move the folder with the home icon into shared.
Now rename the other folder to its proper name.
Then log out and when you log back in you will be logged into the other user folder with your data.
If you created any files under the new user folder you can retrieve them from the folder you dragged into Shared and you will note that it no longer has the home icon.

Restricting the user to only one session. Is this possible ?

We have a web enabled Forms6i application running on Unix AIX server. user logs on to this application through a application logon screen.
We have a requirement where we have to restrict user from logging on more than once to the application.
- We thought of implementing this functionality through a database field which get set and resets each time a user logs on and logs off the application. Issue here is when do u reset the field. ? Is there a trigger on form which fires no matter how user exits from the system , including PC crahs ?
- is there a better way of handling this functionality.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Gana

Try to use Oracle profiles
create profile test limit
sessions_per_user 1;
then assign this profile to the users you want them to have one session only. Moreoever, you have to change the parameter LIMIT_RESOURCES=TRUE in the init.ora parameter file.
After changing the parameter file, shutdwon the database and open it again to let the profiles take effect on the user session.
Good luck

How do I efficiently help multiple users to upgrade their devices?

We have about 15 users using iPad, iPad1, and iPhone4, now the iOS5 is avaialble to these devices, I want to figure out the most efficient way to help them all upgrade to iOS5, while most of them do not have iTunes installed on their workstations, some of them even doesn't have a workstation. Their devides were activated on my computer, and each Apple ID was created on each device.
From my understanding on iDevices, I need to authorize each account on iTunes, to perform a backup, upgrade, and full restore. But if I do them all on my computer, my computer will have collection of contents from 15 Apple ID accounts, it would have to download all apps which were installed by all different users, under one copy of iTunes, that is going to make a mess.
And I can't do it on each of their computers because (1) some users don't have workstation, (2) we do not want them to interact with iTunes, it creates more need of management and support from IT department.
So as an IT guy here, what should I do ? One idea I came up with, which might be stupid, is to configure iTunes and authorize different apple ID's, under different Windwos profile, so one user's app don't get mixed with another one's. I know technically speaking user A's apps won't be sync'ed into user B's device, but I just don't fele comfortable mixing them together and see that it sync'ed 25 out of 80 apps into one upgraded device, that will create some confusions.

anybody, any idea ?

How Do I Allow a List Item to be assigned to multiple users where only one needs to take action on it?

Hey folks,
Building a ticketing type system and when a ticket is opened, we want it to go to everyone on our team, not just one person. What's the best way to accomplish this and how?
Do we:
1. Make the field blank so it's searchable that way?
2. Can the assigned to field tied to active directory be filled in with more than 1 name where it doesn't require all names to take action on it?
3. Saw people mentioning assigning to a group but then not sure how to create a group (names are tied to active directory) and not sure how to make the workflow allow just one and not all individuals in that group to take action on it.
First step would be for the individual taking action on it to reassign it to themselves, effectively taking it out of the "queue"
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Oh and just a note that SharePoint Designer wasn't set up for us to use BUT we have InfoPath and that is something we can use (go figure lol).
Thanks!

Ben I'll send you the VI
Attachments:
TEST.vi ‏589 KB
TEST.vi ‏59 KB

HT4539 When having multiple user accounts on a mac can only one of you use the automatic downloads in iTunes?

Why is it that in itunes on a mac, if you have multiple users, that only one apple id can be used for automatic downloads?

See if this helps: iTunes: How to share music between different accounts on a single computer

How to restrict user to only see Performance Monitoring in RWB?

Hi
I have an issue, where I would like to let a business person see how many requests, there have been the last 24 hours for a given interface in PI 7.11. This can be done, in the RWB -> Performance monitoring, but how do I restrict the user, to only have access to the Performance Monitoring link in RWB?
Shold I just give him the UME role "NWA_READONLY" even though, this probably will also give him access to the other links in RWB? Or is there a smarter way?
BR
MIkael

Hi,
There is no way to provide access to only Performance monitoring in RWB.

Multiple user profiles on Mac-can all access the same itunes/iphoto data?

Hi all,
Just quick question.
Is it possible to set up one mac with multiple users that have their own profiles ( own mail accounts etc) BUT all share the same i photo / itunes / i cal data files etc ? I want to combine the various libraries from a couple of our Mac's and merge them onto one new Imac that I am now sharing with my partner.
We both have iphones and so want to be able to both access our shared photos / music diary etc - but still choose different set ups etc for each of our iphones through seperate itunes through the different profiles?
Does this make sense?
Can any one shed any light on this for me?
Cheers
Paul

You almost might want to post this on the specific and various application forums to get information on how to do each program. Unfortunately OSX makes it incredibly difficult to bulk share files. It has a shared folder for common use, but from my experience unless you hand-edit permissions for each file you can only copy files from that area, not edit them.
For a start:
[Chris CA's instructions on sharing iTunes music libraries between multiple user accounts|http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8973804#8973804]

Restricting Multiple Users To Only Their Specific Areas Of A Site

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for