Retirement Cost in Project Costing

Hi,
Can anyone help me out the steps to capture the retirement costs in Project costing for Capital Projects.
Regards,
Murthy

Well, in a capital project, you collect the CIP and expense costs for each asset you are building. The same applies to retirement costs. You use a capital project to accumulate/capture costs associated with the retirement of a group asset. Oracle manuals do specifcally use the term "retirement of group assets" when capturing retirement work in process (RWIP). You would then interface the RWIP costs to Oracle Assets (the same Mass Additions process as setting up a new asset). Why they say group asset, that I do not understand? Why should it matter if it is a group asset or not, when it comes to retirement? I personally have never done this though. If we have any retirement costs, we just record directly to the general ledger - don't record any Oracle project cost. But then we don't have a lot of assets and don't retire many assets as a result. Will be interesting to see if any Oracle customer out there is actually doing this. You may have to end up going to Oracle Support to get this information. The user guide is not very information about exactly how this RWIP thing works. Make any sense?
John Dickey

Similar Messages

Please elaborate me the mechanism of Asset Retirement

Hi,
Please elaborate me the mechanism of Asset Retirement
Thanks

Hi,
Please go thru the following document if it is helpful.
Asset Retirement:
Purpose
Asset retirement is the removal of an asset or part of an asset from the asset portfolio. This removal of an asset (or part of an asset) is posted from a bookkeeping perspective as an asset retirement. Depending on organizational considerations, or the business transaction which leads to the retirement, you can distinguish the following types of retirement:
An asset is sold, resulting in revenue being earned. The sale is posted with a customer.
An asset is sold, resulting in revenue being earned. The sale is posted against a clearing account.
An asset has to be scrapped, with no revenue earned.
An asset is sold to an affiliated company (refer to Manual Posting of Intercompany Asset Transfer/Retirement)
Process Flow
There are transactions and transaction types in the system for these different retirement types.
Asset Retirement
Asset Sale with Customer
The system enables you to post the entry to Accounts Receivable, the revenue posting and the asset retirement in one step. In this posting transaction, you have to post the revenue (debit A/R, credit revenue from asset sale) first, and then post the asset retirement. An indicator in the posting transaction specifies that the system posts the asset retirement after the revenue posting.
The prerequisite for this is that the sales revenue account in Financial Accounting, to which the revenue should be posted, has a field status variant in its master data in which the Asset retirement field (category Asset Accounting) is defined as a required or optional entry field. You define the field status variant in Customizing for Financial Accounting (Financial Accounting Global Settings ® Document ® Line Item ® Controls).
Posting of Gain or Loss
When you use the standard transaction types, the system automatically creates a gain posting or a loss posting, as well as a revenue clearing entry, in addition to the asset and accumulated depreciation correction postings. This gain/loss posting, as well as the revenue posting, are not dependent on the transaction type. The automatic creation of these postings is controlled by the Gain/loss from retirement indicator in the definition of the transaction type. You can also choose not to set this indicator, in which case you have to enter the postings manually.
In an exceptional situation, an integrated asset retirement with revenue can also be posted although the asset does not have APC in the master depreciation area.
For more information on ways of posting gain and loss, see Posting Gain/Loss.
Retirement Without Revenue
A retirement without revenue is the removal of an asset from the asset portfolio without any revenue, for example, by scrapping. When you use this posting option, the system does not create revenue and gain/loss postings. Instead it creates a Loss from an asset retirement without revenue posting in the amount of the net book value being retired.
Complete/Partial Retirement
An asset retirement can refer to an entire fixed asset (complete retirement) or part of a fixed asset (partial retirement). In both cases, the system automatically determines, using the asset retirement dates entered, the amounts to be charged off for each depreciation area. You can initiate the partial retirement of a fixed asset by entering one of the following:
The amount of the acquisition and production costs being retired
A percentage rate
A quantity
When you enter the amount of APC that is being retired, the system determines the percentage to be retired from the asset using the first depreciation area in which posting is to take place. It determines the percentage amount of APC being retired in that area, and uses the same percentage for other areas. You can enter a quantity, provided that you have not specified a retirement amount or percentage rate. The system interprets the quantity as a ratio to the total quantity of the asset and thereby determines the asset retirement percentage rate. If necessary, you can also manually correct the retirement amounts that were calculated by the system in individual depreciation areas. The system then recalculates the retirement amounts for that area, and any areas that are dependent on that area.
The asset value date of the retirement is recorded in the asset master record. You cannot post any transactions with a value date before the value date of the last retirement. If you nevertheless need to post such a transaction, you must first reverse all retirements that lie after the value date of the belated posting. After posting the belated transaction, you can then re-post the retirements.
Transaction Type (Prior-Year Acquisitions/Current-Year Acquisitions)
Make sure that you select the correct transaction type for both partial and complete retirement. For the complete retirement of a fixed asset acquired in previous years, always select a transaction type intended for prior-year acquisitions. A partial retirement can always relate either to prior-year acquisitions or to current-year acquisitions.
The complete retirement of a fixed asset is only possible if all transactions to the asset were posted with a value date before the asset value date of asset retirement. You must clear or reverse down payments and investment support measures, which are in the same posting year as the retirement, before you post the complete retirement.
Prior-year asset acquisitions and current-year acquisitions are shown separately from one another in the document.
Proportional Value Adjustments
Based on the value date and period control, the system automatically determines the reference period for the retirement. The system automatically determines any depreciation (value adjustments) that is applicable to the part of the asset being retired, up to the reference period (retirement). The system automatically retires this depreciation at the time of the retirement transaction. This procedure guarantees that the percentage of the book value that is retired is identical with the percentage of the acquisition and production costs that is retired.
Graphic: Determining Proportional Value Adjustments
The system automatically posts the proportional value adjustments retired during an asset retirement. You can specify special transaction types for this automatic posting. You enter these transaction types in the Customizing definition of the retirement or transfer transaction types (Value adjustments function). These special transaction types for the proportional value adjustments are particularly important for group consolidations, so that the individual transaction can be identified as retirement of transfer.
The standard transaction types delivered by SAP are already defined in this way. The system uses the transaction type 290 for proportional values with retirements. For transfers it uses transaction types 390/395 (transfer retirement/acquisition).
Retirement of Low Value Assets
There are special considerations for the retirement of low value assets (LVAs). It is usually necessary to simplify the business transactions involved, due to the large number of assets that are being retired. It is not necessary to actually post the retirement of low value assets in order for the assets transactions to be displayed correctly in the asset history sheet. It is possible to simulate the retirements of low value assets during a time period you specify. Enter the LVA asset classes and the simulation time period in the initial screen of the asset history sheet (see Asset History Sheet).
If you want to actually post the retirement of low value assets, use the usual procedure for asset retirements.
Retiring Several Asset Subnumbers Simultaneously
The system enables you to post the complete retirement of several subnumbers of a fixed asset in one step (generic entry using an asterisk (*) in the subnumber field). The system performs asset postings and value adjustment postings for each sub-number.
Sales revenue is proportionally allocated to the individual sub-numbers according to their acquisition value (including revaluation).
Retirement of Assets with Investment Support
For information on the special concerns involved when retiring assets with investment support, see Investment Support on the Liabilities Side and Investment Support Managed on the Assets Side .
Retirement Costs
It is possible to enter the costs of the retirement (for example, removal costs) for statistical purposes during the retirement posting. The standard report for asset retirements (Information System) then displays these costs in a special field. Note that gain/loss and retirement costs are shown separately in the report. In addition, the retirement costs are not automatically transferred to cost accounting.
Mass Retirement
When an enterprise sells a large portion of its fixed assets (such as a plant or a building), it is necessary to post the retirement of all the individual assets which make up the whole. Since the number of affected assets can be very large, the Asset Accounting (FI-AA) component makes it possible to make the necessary postings using mass processing. For more information, see Mass Retirement.
Thanks,
Prithwiraj.

Re: query report

hi experts,
i want to prepare a query in sq01 for following fields.
asset class, desc of asset, retirement (cost of disposal value) , depr retired, ret book value, disposal amount, gain or loss the same sequence i can see in s_alr_87012052 but i want to see only disposal but in this report i can see write off & disposal.
so if anybody have detail steps how to create a query let me know.
the tables for this query is
ANAR Asset Types
ANAT Asset type text
ANEA Asset Line Items for Proportional Values
ANEK Document Header Asset Posting
ANEP Asset Line Items
ANEV Asset downpymt settlement
ANGA Asset catalog general data
ANGB Asset catalog deprec. area
ANGT Asset catalog text table
ANIA Depr. simulation for invest. projects
ANIB Investment projects depr. simulation depr.
ANKA Asset classes: general data
ANKAZ Asset class: extension for technical field
ANKB Asset class: depreciation area
ANKL Generation table for generating asset clas
ANKLAY Asset class: Assignment of tab layouts
ANKLAYP Asset class: Assignment of tab layouts
ANKP Asset classes: Fld Cont Dpndnt on Chart of
ANKT Asset classes: Description
ANKV Asset classes: insurance types
ANLA Asset Master Record Segment
ANLB Depreciation terms
ANLBZW Asset-specific base values
ANLC Asset Value Fields
ANLE Asset Origin by Line Item
ANLH Main asset number
ANLH Main asset number
ANLI Link table for investment measure -> AuC
ANLK Asset Origin by Cost Element
ANLP Asset Periodic Values
ANLQ Period values from dep. posting run per po
ANLT Asset Texts
ANLU Asset Master Record: User Fields
ANLV Insurance data
ANLW Insurable values (year dependent)
ANLX Asset Master Record Segment
ANLZ Time-Dependent Asset Allocations
thanks in advance,
kk.

Hello,
Go to SQ00
Click on Quick Viewer
Give your query name
Create
Select Description
Select Logical Database
Give your logical data base.
Select your list fields and selection fields
Save it.
Execute it.
Regards,
Ravi

Reducing assets value

Hello our business wants to reduce the tax value of an asset.
I created two transaction types by copying 200/250 and restricted them to the tax area only. Is this the right way? the asset has two transactions as a result of settlements from Asset Under construction in the current year. When I try to post a retirement to reduce the value of the asset I am getting an error message
The asset has a lot of value this year( I just
Check amount entered (Amount is too high)
Message no. AA317
Diagnosis
The retirement amount entered is higher than the sum of the transactions changing the acquisition value in area . Taking into account the entered asset value date and the posting period, the maximum retirement amount is 1.00.
Procedure
Check the asset value date, the posting period, and the retirement amount.
If there are also acquisitions from previous years on the asset, then you have to post the retirement of the acquisitions from previous years separately, using a different transaction type

Hi,
From your inputs, its been understood two TTY's created with standard transactions types 200/250.
200 - Retirement without revenue, 250 - Retirement of current year acquisition w/o revenue.
Therefore we would like you to use TTY 250 for the retiring the APC cost of current year acquistion and also you must remember that the retirement cost cannot be greater than the APC costs.
Please let me know if you stil have any issues.
Regards
Govindarajan

&column in report query

Hi Friends,
I opened some of the complex reports in Oracle Applications and I see &column_name in the query.
Where does this variable column ask an input value for substitution?
I thought the input parameter is like this one > :P_INPUT
Thanks a lot

Hi again,
Please see before report or after trigger form.
Its a lexical parameter called in queryI tried to open an Oracle Apps report to study it (FAS400.rdf)
I found 3 queries:
Q_1
select count (*) from fa_system_controlsQ_2
SELECT
     &ACCT_FLEX_BAL_SEG     COMP_CODE,
     decode(TRANSACTION_TYPE,'B',RSV.RESERVE_ACCT, &ACCT_FLEX_ACCT_SEG )     GL_ACCOUNT,
     RSV.DEPRN_RESERVE_ACCT     RSV_ACCOUNT,
     &ACCT_FLEX_COST_SEG     COST_CENTER,
     AD.ASSET_NUMBER || '-' || AD.DESCRIPTION
          ASSET_NUMBER,
     DATE_PLACED_IN_SERVICE          START_DATE,
     METHOD_CODE               METHOD,
     RSV.LIFE                    LIFE,
     RSV.RATE               ADJ_RATE,
     DS.BONUS_RATE               BONUS_RATE,
     RSV.CAPACITY               PROD,
     SUM(decode(transaction_type,'B',NULL,COST))               COST,
     SUM(RSV.DEPRN_AMOUNT)         DEPRN_AMOUNT,
     SUM(RSV.YTD_DEPRN)          YTD_DEPRN,
     SUM(RSV.DEPRN_RESERVE)          DEPRN_RESERVE,
     sum(decode(transaction_type,'B',NULL,nvl(PERCENT,0)))          PERCENT,
     TRANSACTION_TYPE          T_TYPE
FROM
     FA_RESERVE_LEDGER_GT     RSV,
     FA_ADDITIONS          AD,
     GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS     CC,
     &lp_fa_deprn_summary     DS
WHERE
     RSV.ASSET_ID          = AD.ASSET_ID
AND
     RSV.DH_CCID          = CC.CODE_COMBINATION_ID
AND
     DS.PERIOD_COUNTER (+)     = RSV.PERIOD_COUNTER     AND
     DS.BOOK_TYPE_CODE (+)     = :P_Book               AND
     DS.ASSET_ID (+)          = RSV.ASSET_ID
GROUP BY
     &ACCT_FLEX_BAL_SEG,
     decode(transaction_type,'B', RSV.RESERVE_ACCT,&ACCT_FLEX_ACCT_SEG),
     RSV.DEPRN_RESERVE_ACCT,
     &ACCT_FLEX_COST_SEG,
     AD.ASSET_NUMBER,
     AD.DESCRIPTION,
     DATE_PLACED_IN_SERVICE,
     METHOD_CODE,
     RSV.LIFE,
     RSV.RATE,
     RSV.CAPACITY,
     DS.BONUS_RATE,
     TRANSACTION_TYPE
ORDER BY
     1, 2, 3, 4, 5Q_3
SELECT Company_Name,
             Category_Flex_Structure,
             Location_Flex_Structure,
             Asset_Key_Flex_Structure,
             'P' a_partial_retirement,
             'F' a_full_retirement,
             'T' a_transfer_out,
             'N' a_non_depreciate,
             'R' a_reclass,
             'B' a_bonus
FROM   FA_SYSTEM_CONTROLSTriggers:
function AfterPForm return boolean is
begin
IF :p_ca_set_of_books_id <> -1999
THEN
BEGIN
   select mrc_sob_type_code, currency_code
   into :p_mrcsobtype, :lp_currency_code
   from gl_sets_of_books
   where set_of_books_id = :p_ca_set_of_books_id;
EXCEPTION
    WHEN OTHERS THEN
     :p_mrcsobtype := 'P';
END;
ELSE
   :p_mrcsobtype := 'P';
END IF;
IF upper(:p_mrcsobtype) = 'R'
THEN
:lp_fa_deprn_summary := 'FA_DEPRN_SUMMARY_MRC_V';
ELSE
:lp_fa_deprn_summary := 'FA_DEPRN_SUMMARY';
END IF;
return (TRUE);
end;
function BeforeReport return boolean is
begin
SRW.USER_EXIT('FND SRWINIT');
IF upper(:p_mrcsobtype) = 'R'
THEN
fnd_client_info.set_currency_context(:p_ca_set_of_books_id);
END IF;
return (TRUE);
end;LEXICALS:
&ACCT_FLEX_BAL_SEG
&ACCT_FLEX_ACCT_SEG
&ACCT_FLEX_COST_SEG
&lp_fa_deprn_summaryReport Output Columns:
sset Number - Date Placed Date                               Net Book     Proceeds of                                      Trans
Description     in Service Retired        Cost Retired   Value Retired            Sale    Removal Cost       Gain/Loss     Number
--------------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ----------May question is ...instead of outputting it to the above....How can I create/make a "view" from the 3 queries?
Why is that I do not see any relation of the "lexicals" to the "afterform" and "beforereport" triggers?
Please help :(
Thanks a lot

Table ANLC and Field ABGAN update

Hi All,
How the values in the Table ANLC and Field ABGAN (Total retirements and retiring transfers) gets updated ?
Thanks,
Zahid

Hi Zahid,
you have to determine them on your own then. The information can be gathered by the AA document tables (ANEK, ANEP, ANEA). In case you want to calculate retirement cost you have to evaluate all the transactions posted with a retirement transaction type.
Look into the ABAP report RABEWG_ALV01, you should be able to adapt some logic from this report.
Regards,
Markus

Re: query table

hi experts,
i want to prepare a query in SQ*.
asset class, desc of asset, retirement (cost of disposal value) , depr retired, ret book value, disposal amount, gain or loss the same sequence i can see in s_alr_87012052 but i want to see only disposal but in this report i can see write off & disposal.
so if anybody do the same earlier give the exact table name from which the data i can get to define the query.
thanks in advance,
kk.

Hi
AA dokuments are stored in ANEK->ANEP->ANEA
The better way is change the alv report: set filter on transaction type to fit your needs.
Ryszard

Re: structure names

hi experts,
i want to prepare a query in sqvi for following fields.
asset, retirement (cost of disposal value) , depr retired, ret book value, ret revenue, gain or loss.
so i want to create a quickviewer in sqvi can anybody give me the structure names for the following requirement. the values i can see in standard report 87012052 but due to confusing the user want in quickviewer.
thanks in advance,
kk.

Hi
If you want to create ABAP Query fist you should identify the required fieldu2019s technical names and which table they are in. Second thing is we should have one field act as a primary field in all tables then only you can join the tables and pull the data from tables.
Give a name to the query and click on the Create button give the description and specify the output length. Select the functional group that you desired
The Select Field screen gets displayed. Select all the fields from the user group that you need to display on the output of the query.
Regards
GCS

Empty/Invisible Topics, Multiple Authors

I'm in a situation where I share a project with two other
authors. All three of us access the project's directory structure
via the office LAN, but I have RoboHelp 7 installed on my machine,
whereas the other two authors are less frequent contributors, and
they use a Remote Desktop Connection to access RoboHelp 7 installed
on a network resource.
I've created dozens of topics and successfully published the
project for months. Two of my topics appear empty to the other two
authors when they attempt to open them from the network resource.
They can see the topics, see their page in the TOC, and double
click on them to open them in the work area, but all they see is a
blank topic.
Recently, one of the other authors published some updates to
other parts of the manual that also somehow blanked the topic in
our published product (thankfully internal use only) AND blanked
the topic's actual .htm file in the project's directory structure.
When I went to open the topic on my local machine, it was gone. I
had to go out to a playground layout and rebuild the topic from an
older version.
My fellow author still couldn't see the contents of the
topic. So yesterday I deleted the topic entirely and created a
fresh topic with the same name. She STILL can't see the contents of
my brand new topic . . . Any ideas what might cause a topic to
appear empty to another author?
We are not using Version Control yet, as we so infrequently
work in the same portions of the project. This is a case for
version control if I ever saw one. We're retiring this RH7 project
in a few months, and I've already got an SVN repository lined up
for the replacement project. Still, the question remains. What
makes a topic appear empty?

Hi Heath
The only way RoboHelp HTML works reliably is by keeping the
project on your local C drive and working on it from there. You
really need to move the project off the network drive. Until you do
that, there isn't much help we can (or would be willing to try and)
provide to troubleshoot this situation.
Cheers... Rick

Portfolio Type dependent Item Types

Hi,
Is there a way in which we can restrict the item types to a particular portfolio type?
During the creation of an item, the item types relevant for that portfolio type should only be displayed for selection.
Please let me know on how to achieve this.
Thanks in advance.
Priyatham

Also, just a heads-up:
If you enable this feature while rendering obsolete any older Item Types, the "Item Type" field in the Item Details screen of older Items will display its Code and not its Text values. Not to worry though if the Items are closed or in final state (and no longer require modification), as the Item Dashboard will still show textual values regardless of portfolio-specific settings.
Crisis averted there.
True scenario:
I made this change fairly recently along with modifying Project Templates. The requirement was to change template/standard project structures, and I thought it best practice to retain and simply "Flag as Obsolete" any older templates. The major change in the template was that the the number of Phases in the new template are now less than the template to be retired. Some projects were already in-flight and we could not simply reuse the old Item Types (and modify their DPs) as while testing I found that the deleted DPs would:
Display in the UI with their code values (like 'ZDP001')
Disallow status updates, and
Automatically set the "Active DP" flag for the deleted DP, within items with final DP set to final status. (i.e. project is ready to close)
The result was that Items couldn't be closed properly! Either way, the above approach caused data inconsistencies so it was unacceptable. Hence, this would be one practical reason to maintain portfolio-dependent item types
Just for reference, here's what the configuration looked like, with Portfolio-Dependent Settings and default/Permitted Item Types:
Portfolio-Dependent Item Types:
Default Templates: (shows obsolete Item Type codes)
Item Type field displayed as code in Item Details:
(Note: In standard, this field is set to Read-Only, but for the sake of illustration I'm showing you the valid item types in the dropdown --- and it does NOT include the obsolete Item Type 'Z001')
Solution:
Implement the following OSS Note:
Note 1953807 - Item Type ID is displayed in Item Overview
I hope this helps you get out of a pickle, before your users even get to that state.
- Lawrence

PS - Report on Planned v/s actual cost of the project

Hi,
I have a client requirement on the above subject. In Report S_ALR_87013542, Under actual cost the system is taking both the Revenue and Actual cost booked on the project. Is there any other report wherein the system shows only the actual cost booked on the project so that planned V/s Actual can be compared.
Rgds,
Prasad

Hi,
You can also refer the report S_ALR_87013543 - Actual/Plan/Variance Absolute/Variance %. This will give the reports based on cost elements. Morever plan cost Vs actual cost can be obtained from Project Infosystem report (CN41/ CNS41).
In fact the report S_ALR_87013533 is a hiecherachical report for plan & actual cost of project.
If the system is calculating wrongly both revenue & actual cost under actual then you need to check Cost elements asignments & value category details.
Hope this will help you.
Regards,
Rakesh Pradhan

Opening Balances for Project Costing in R12

Hi All,
What are the Open transactions should be migrated as Opening Balance in Project Costing (R12) for Projects and Tasks. Here at client place cost will come from Inv, PO, AP and OTL to Project costing (R12). Can you please explain in detail (Opening Balances & Historical Cost - How to Migrate)?
Waiting for replies...

Hi
Usually on implementation of Projects, people are migrating total historical costs per project.
Depend on your current system, you may convert the historical data summarized by project, task, expenditure organization and expenditure type. There is an option to summarize costs into the latest period, just before starting the future transactions import into Projects. Otherwise, consider summarizing cost data per period, per quarter or per year.
The summarized data may be loaded as miscellaneous expenditures into Projects.
Be aware that for converted expenditures you should setup a Transaction Source which is costed and accounted.
Dina

S_ALR_87013532 report -plan cost not rolling upto the WBS/Project level

Dear All,
Plan cost from production orders is not rolling up to the WBS/Project level in S_ALR_87013532 ( Plan/Actual Variance report).
Where as plan cost from network is properly rolling up to the WBS/Project level in the above report.
Please suggest what could be the reason for this issue. Is any configuration needs to be done for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Dear sir,
Thanks for the reply & sorry for late response from my side.
OPSV settings are already maintained in our system.
Some how i realized later that cost are actaully getting rolled to the WBS level, but we have observed one more discrepancy.
Example -
Production order "X" value - 100 ( as seen through co03)
Production order "X"value- 40 ( as seen through report s_alr_87013532).
We found that in report s_alr_87013532 , although my total producton order value of 100 is represented at the WBS /Project level, but at the production order level , it is showing value of 40.
On further analysis we found that for production order X
Materail cost- 60
Labour cost-40
The material cost of 60 is not getting fetched against production order "X" in report " S_ALR_87013532".
There are very few cases , where such discrepancy is seen.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Vishal

How can I order more than one project to save on delivery costs?

Is it possible to order more than one project (book) in iPhoto at the same time to save on delivery costs? I have several to order and I dont want to get hit for £5.99 three time if possible. I cant see how to do it or even if this is possible. Any guidance would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Andy

You can only order identical projects on one order. If they are different then a seperate order is required
LN

Can you set a Cost Rate Table to be used for an entire project

In earlier versions of project, the default cost rate table (A) is used unless changed by the user for each assignment. In 2010, is it possible to define which cost rate table to use for the entire project, not at the assignment level?
Thanks.

Hi melduncan,
Welcome to this Microsoft Project forum:)
I assume you want project to have a default cost rate, so why not set the cost rate details into A to begin with, You could then set this as a template from which you initiate all your new projects see FAQ
Item: 8. New Project Template. FAQs, companion products and other useful Project information can be seen at this web address: http://project.mvps.org/faqs.htm
Hope this helps - please let us know how you get on :)
Mike Glen
MS Project MVP
See
http://tinyurl.com/2xbhc for my free Project Tutorials
"" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
In earlier versions of project, the default cost rate table (A) is used unless changed by the user for each assignment. In 2010, is it possible to define which cost rate table to use for the entire project, not at the assignment level?
Thanks.

Retirement Cost in Project Costing

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for