Returning Versions in directoryfiles on vms

Hi Forte Wizards
Again I'm troubled by something that I'm sure is just plain manual stuff, I just can't seem to
find the correct page to read...
SO:
How do I persuade a directoryfile's listfiles to return all versions of a given file on VMS?
It seems to only recognize the name and not the versions...
may the forte be with you
Jens Chr /KAD Denmark
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Hi
using your suffix I get the list of all the files - fine, now all I need i the FULL vms
file name to be able to open them.
your way of creating the versionno's could be expanded by checking for the existence
of the file with each of the versionno's in the directory.... I will go for that if noone suggests a
cleaner solution (The directory listing is on a remote node w/o forte, so each lookup involves
some network traffic (read: delay)).
thank you for your answer
jens chr/KAD Denmark
----- Original Message -----
From: Andy Grace <[email protected]>
To: JCJJ <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: 23. juni 1999 02:10
Subject: Re: Returning Versions in directoryfiles on vms
Hi,
If you pass listfiles the suffix parameter of '*;*' it will return all
versions of all files - the ;* can be tagged after whatever suffix you want
to return all versions of files with that suffix.
However, once it has returned the files determining their version is a
problem and I would be interested to hear what others have to say on this -
we use this rather crude method to display the files;
For all identical filenames in the listfiles array assume the first
occurrence is version ;0 and concat this to the filename for display in an
array of textdata. For each subsequent occurrence subtract 1 from the
version number and so on - so we can at least list our files thus
TEMP.DAT;0
TEMP.DAT;-1
enabling us to distinguish between without knowing their true version number.
Hope this helps
Andy
At 11:47 PM 6/22/99 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Forte Wizards
Again I'm troubled by something that I'm sure is just plain manual stuff,I just can't seem to
find the correct page to read...
SO:
How do I persuade a directoryfile's listfiles to return all versions of agiven file on VMS?
It seems to only recognize the name and not the versions...
may the forte be with you
Jens Chr /KAD Denmark
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Andy Grace
Analyst/Programmer
Administrative Technology Services
tel 0064 - 3 - 479 8370
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

Similar Messages

  • Re: Returning Versions in directoryfiles on vms

    Hi again
    At 07:10 AM 6/23/99 +0200, you wrote:
    Hi
    using your suffix I get the list of all the files - fine, now all I need ithe FULL vms
    file name to be able to open them.
    By FULL VMS file name do you mean that you need to be able to get the
    volume details into the filename? I think the SetVolume method
    of file should help there.
    your way of creating the versionno's could be expanded by checking for theexistence
    of the file with each of the versionno's in the directory.... I will gofor that if noone suggests a
    cleaner solution (The directory listing is on a remote node w/o forte, soeach lookup involves
    some network traffic (read: delay)).
    The ;0 ;-1 etc suffix will open the correct version of the file for you,
    with ;0 being the most recent, and avoid having to repeatedly search the
    directory for specific versions, which as you say will cause some delay.
    thank you for your answerNo worries - hope it's some help
    Cheers,
    Andy
    jens chr/KAD Denmark
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Andy Grace <[email protected]>
    To: JCJJ <[email protected]>
    Cc: <[email protected]>
    Sent: 23. juni 1999 02:10
    Subject: Re: Returning Versions in directoryfiles on vms
    Hi,
    If you pass listfiles the suffix parameter of '*;*' it will return all
    versions of all files - the ;* can be tagged after whatever suffix you want
    to return all versions of files with that suffix.
    However, once it has returned the files determining their version is a
    problem and I would be interested to hear what others have to say on this -
    we use this rather crude method to display the files;
    For all identical filenames in the listfiles array assume the first
    occurrence is version ;0 and concat this to the filename for display in an
    array of textdata. For each subsequent occurrence subtract 1 from the
    version number and so on - so we can at least list our files thus
    TEMP.DAT;0
    TEMP.DAT;-1
    enabling us to distinguish between without knowing their true version
    number.
    >>
    Hope this helps
    Andy
    At 11:47 PM 6/22/99 +0200, you wrote:
    Hi Forte Wizards
    Again I'm troubled by something that I'm sure is just plain manual stuff,I just can't seem to
    find the correct page to read...
    SO:
    How do I persuade a directoryfile's listfiles to return all versions of agiven file on VMS?
    It seems to only recognize the name and not the versions...
    may the forte be with you
    Jens Chr /KAD Denmark
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Andy Grace
    Analyst/Programmer
    Administrative Technology Services
    tel 0064 - 3 - 479 8370
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Andy Grace
    Analyst/Programmer
    Administrative Technology Services
    tel 0064 - 3 - 479 8370
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

    Hi again
    At 07:10 AM 6/23/99 +0200, you wrote:
    Hi
    using your suffix I get the list of all the files - fine, now all I need ithe FULL vms
    file name to be able to open them.
    By FULL VMS file name do you mean that you need to be able to get the
    volume details into the filename? I think the SetVolume method
    of file should help there.
    your way of creating the versionno's could be expanded by checking for theexistence
    of the file with each of the versionno's in the directory.... I will gofor that if noone suggests a
    cleaner solution (The directory listing is on a remote node w/o forte, soeach lookup involves
    some network traffic (read: delay)).
    The ;0 ;-1 etc suffix will open the correct version of the file for you,
    with ;0 being the most recent, and avoid having to repeatedly search the
    directory for specific versions, which as you say will cause some delay.
    thank you for your answerNo worries - hope it's some help
    Cheers,
    Andy
    jens chr/KAD Denmark
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Andy Grace <[email protected]>
    To: JCJJ <[email protected]>
    Cc: <[email protected]>
    Sent: 23. juni 1999 02:10
    Subject: Re: Returning Versions in directoryfiles on vms
    Hi,
    If you pass listfiles the suffix parameter of '*;*' it will return all
    versions of all files - the ;* can be tagged after whatever suffix you want
    to return all versions of files with that suffix.
    However, once it has returned the files determining their version is a
    problem and I would be interested to hear what others have to say on this -
    we use this rather crude method to display the files;
    For all identical filenames in the listfiles array assume the first
    occurrence is version ;0 and concat this to the filename for display in an
    array of textdata. For each subsequent occurrence subtract 1 from the
    version number and so on - so we can at least list our files thus
    TEMP.DAT;0
    TEMP.DAT;-1
    enabling us to distinguish between without knowing their true version
    number.
    >>
    Hope this helps
    Andy
    At 11:47 PM 6/22/99 +0200, you wrote:
    Hi Forte Wizards
    Again I'm troubled by something that I'm sure is just plain manual stuff,I just can't seem to
    find the correct page to read...
    SO:
    How do I persuade a directoryfile's listfiles to return all versions of agiven file on VMS?
    It seems to only recognize the name and not the versions...
    may the forte be with you
    Jens Chr /KAD Denmark
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Andy Grace
    Analyst/Programmer
    Administrative Technology Services
    tel 0064 - 3 - 479 8370
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
    Andy Grace
    Analyst/Programmer
    Administrative Technology Services
    tel 0064 - 3 - 479 8370
    To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
    'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
    Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>

  • Remote Agent: OLT returns Version Check Failed to Match

    I am attempting to use remote agents. I have tried both Windows and Linux agents with identical results.
    After running a test with one of the remote agents the server shows:
    Status Current Error
    Orphaned Agent Version Check failed to Match
    Client shows:
    18:19:04,198 INFO [Messenger] Try server=t3://192.168.32.102:8088 queue=queue/AgentPoolNotificationQueue
    18:19:04,259 INFO [Messenger] Got ConnectionFactory
    18:19:04,273 INFO [Messenger] Got queue queue/AgentPoolNotificationQueue
    18:19:04,291 INFO [Messenger] Created queue connection.
    18:19:04,304 INFO [Messenger] Created queue session.
    18:19:04,316 INFO [Messenger] Connected to server=t3://192.168.32.102:8088 queue=queue/AgentPoolNotificationQueue
    18:19:04,316 INFO [Request] [URL:t3://192.168.32.102:8088;Requestor Username: oats;Requestor Key:99bb5c62-f65a-4dbc-b8cb-db44bbd3ece4;Requestor Queue:queue/AgentPoolNotificationQueue;Request ID:6;Request:stopagent;] - authentication successful
    18:19:04,316 ERROR [EmpStartMain] Unknown agent ID: agId14_rnda167a6bd-2f25-4be8-b449-903b9bb7cd40
    Any help is much appreciated. Searched Metalink and didn't find anything on this specific error.
    Thanks,
    John A. Booth
    http://www.metavero.com

    The wording in the original error "Version Check failed to Match" makes me think this is similar to something I encountered once after installing a small patch release. You need to make sure the Agent installed on the remote machine is the same version as the controller.
    e.g. If you had installed OATSv9.00 on both controller and agent machines and then upgraded JUST the controller to OATSv9.01 the controller would no longer be able to talk to the v9.00 agent on the remote machine.
    I could be wrong, but that's essentially what I found with one of the earlier v8 upgrades.
    Try upgrading the agent on your remote machine(s) with the same installation you have on your controller (but only install the agent, not the whole OATS paclage).
    Edited by: IHodgetts on Jan 28, 2010 4:55 PM

  • [Exchange-Online][EWS][EWS-XML] Exchange server version "V2_22" returned for Office 365 breaks pattern - consequences?

    I just notice that talking to Office365 Exchange Web Services at https://outlook.office365.com/ews/exchange.asmx I get this in my SOAP response header:
    <Envelope>
      <Header>
        <ServerVersionInfo MajorVersion="15" MinorVersion="0" MajorBuildNumber="1049" MinorBuildNumber="23" Version="V2_22"/>
      </Header>
    This means that the Version 'schema version' property (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/exchangewebservices.serverversioninfo.version%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx) now breaks the pattern of versions that we had earlier: Exchange2007, Exchange2007_SP1, Exchange2010,
    Exchange2010_SP1, Exchange2010_SP2, Exchange2013
    In the schema files I found through Google (searching for <xs:simpleType name="ExchangeVersionType">) I could not find anything later than <xs:enumeration value="Exchange2013"/> (e.g. at http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee237685%28v=exchg.80%29.aspx)
    If I do a SOAP request with this "V2_22" string, I still get valid answers.
    <soapenv:Envelope
      xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"
      xmlns:typ="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types"
      xmlns:mes="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages">
       <soapenv:Header>
          <typ:RequestServerVersion Version="V2_22"/>
       </soapenv:Header>
    But it now looks as if the returned Version is no longer a reliable way to determine the Exchange server version. If V2_22 is not documented anywhere, who says it will not suddenly change to V2_23 tomorrow?
    Question: Does this mean I will now have to change my version detection code to look at MajorVersion and then maintain a cross reference between MajorVersion and ExchangeVersionType **myself**? That is horrible: another dependency to maintain
    is another potential code break.
    As an aside: Note that the "Exchange Server Updates: build numbers and release dates" at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh135098%28v=exchg.150%29.aspx is no longer up to date, it does not mention the 15.0.1049.23 that my XML just returned

    What really matters in EWS is the SchemaVersion as that will tell you what operations you can and can't use. From 2010 on you can use AutoDiscover to find what SchemaVersions are supported which is the best way to do version detection. eg
    AutodiscoverService adAutoDiscoverService = new AutodiscoverService(ExchangeVersion.Exchange2010);
    adAutoDiscoverService.Credentials = ncCred;
    adAutoDiscoverService.EnableScpLookup = false;
    adAutoDiscoverService.RedirectionUrlValidationCallback = adAutoDiscoCallBack;
    adAutoDiscoverService.PreAuthenticate = true;
    GetUserSettingsResponse adResponse = adAutoDiscoverService.GetUserSettings("[email protected]", (new UserSettingName[1] { UserSettingName.EwsSupportedSchemas }));
    if (adResponse.Settings.Count >= 1)
    String schemas = (String)adResponse.Settings[UserSettingName.EwsSupportedSchemas];
    I would be careful using the Major build going forward if you have a look at the requests in OWA in Office365 you'll see they are using version 16 in cookies etc
    Cheers
    Glen

  • VMS File Extensions

    Hi,
    We have MacOS and Win 95 boxes talking to an Alpha running OpenVMS.
    Our Forte applications run some reports on the Alpha box, due to
    their size etc. However, we want the users (on the PCs) to be able to
    manipulate the resulting files as necessary. At the moment we get a
    list of the files in a "user" directory and display that on the
    screen. Unfortunately, we can't seem to get the version numbers of the
    files (it isn't in the suffix, where I would expect it to be). This is important, as the
    User needs to know which file is the latest version (or the previous one etc).
    Does anybody have any way of getting the version number for a VMS
    file in Forte?
    Thanks in advance
    Derek Rendall
    University of Otago
    New Zealand

    Elevlyn,
    Thank you for fully explaining the situation. Now I can suggest you try this .ged reader.
    1) Make a backup of your ged file.
    2) Download the reader, and run a virus scan on the program before you run the the installer.
    3) Test the reader
    4) Please report back the progress. What the reader OK?
    I am a volunteer. I am not an HP employee.
    To say THANK YOU, press the "thumbs up symbol" to render a KUDO. Please click Accept as Solution, if your problem is solved. You can render both Solution and KUDO.
    The Law of Effect states that positive reinforcement increases the probability of a behavior being repeated. (B.F.Skinner). You toss me KUDO and/or Solution, and I perform better.
    (2) HP DV7t i7 3160QM 2.3Ghz 8GB
    HP m9200t E8400,Win7 Pro 32 bit. 4GB RAM, ASUS 550Ti 2GB, Rosewill 630W. 1T HD SATA 3Gb/s
    Custom Asus P8P67, I7-2600k, 16GB RAM, WIN7 Pro 64bit, EVGA GTX660 2GB, 750W OCZ, 1T HD SATA 6Gb/s
    Custom Asus P8Z77, I7-3770k, 16GB RAM, WIN7 Pro 64bit, EVGA GTX670 2GB, 750W OCZ, 1T HD SATA 6Gb/s
    Both Customs use Rosewill Blackhawk case.
    Printer -- HP OfficeJet Pro 8600 Plus

  • Code to get the latest version of an entitiy using wcf?

    Hi,
    I am using WCF services to get entities in MDS. I want to get the entities only in the l;atest version. Can you please share code/api asto how to get the latest version of a model in MDS using WCF?
    Thanks

    You can use MetadataGet API to get all versions associated with the model and then sort them by CreatedDateTime or
    UpdatedDateTime depending how you define "the latest version" .
    The code would be like :
    var mdGetRequest = new MetadataGetRequest
    SearchCriteria =
    Models = new Collection<DC.Identifier>()
    new DC.Identifier() {Name = "Account"}
    ResultOptions = {Versions = DC.ResultType.Identifiers},
    // Call MDS service
    MetadataGetResponse mdGetResponse = MyServicesApiUtility.MdsService.MetadataGet(mdGetRequest);
    if (mdGetResponse.OperationResult.Errors.Count == 0 && mdGetResponse.Metadata.Versions.Count != 0)
    var versions = new List<DC.Version>(mdGetResponse.Metadata.Versions);
    versions.Sort(
    (ver1, ver2) => ver2.AuditInfo.CreatedDateTime.CompareTo(ver1.AuditInfo.CreatedDateTime));
    return versions.First();
    else
    throw new Exception(string.Format("No version related to model {0}.", "Account"));

  • X-path query to get all versions of  a node at a given path in JSP

    hi need a xpath query so that i can list all the versions of a selected node which can be used for restoring the version to that particular one??

    I'm not sure about an xpath query (which was deprecated in JCR 2.0), but here's how you could use the JCR API to retrieve all of the versions from a path:
         * Returns all of the versions at the specified path as a List of Versions.
         * @param session
         *            the currect JCR session, must not be null
         * @param path
         *            the absolute path of the node to retrieve
         * @return the list of versions at the specified path
         * @throws UnsupportedRepositoryOperationException
         *             thrown if the node at the specified path is not versionable
         * @throws RepositoryException
         *             an unexpected exception occurs interacting with the JCR
         *             repository
        public List<javax.jcr.version.Version> getVersions(final Session session,
            final String path) throws UnsupportedRepositoryOperationException,
            RepositoryException {
        final List<Version> versions = new ArrayList<Version>();
        final VersionManager versionMgr = session.getWorkspace()
            .getVersionManager();
        final VersionHistory versionHistory = versionMgr
            .getVersionHistory(path);
        final VersionIterator versionIterator = versionHistory.getAllVersions();
        while (versionIterator.hasNext()) {
            versions.add(versionIterator.nextVersion());
        return versions;

  • What enhancements are in VMS 2.3

    Could someone on the list please tell me what the major enhancements are in VMS 2.3 other then bug fixes or at least give a URL where I could read the information?
    The version of 2.3 VMS server that can be downloaded from Cisco today contains the following components:
    CiscoWorks Common Services 2.2 with SP3
    CiscoWorks Mgmt Center for Firewalls 1.3.3
    CiscoWorks Auto Update Server 1.3
    CiscoWorks Mgmt Center for VPN Routers 1.3.1
    CiscoWorks Mgmt Center for IDS Sensors 2.01
    CiscoWorks Monitoring Center for Security 2.01
    CiscoWorks Monitoring Center for Performance 2.02
    Mgmt Center for Cisco Security Agents 4.0.3
    I currently use VMS 2.2 SP2 with SecMon 2.02 and idsmc 2.02

    You could check the release notes..also, this link could be helpful to you .... http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/cscowork/ps2330/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a00803c0f1e.html

  • Version Oracle JVM 10.2.0.4 patchset

    Hi,
    I would like to ask you what is the version of Oracle JVM in patchset 10.2.0.4?
    Version of Oracle JVM:
    create or replace and compile java source named java_version as
    public class JavaVersion
    public static String Get()
    String Version = System.getProperties().getProperty("java.version");
    return Version;
    SQL> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION fnc_JavaVersion RETURN VARCHAR2 AS
    LANGUAGE JAVA NAME 'JavaVersion.Get( ) return java.lang.String';
    SELECT fnc_JavaVersion() FROM dual;
    If an error occurs try:
    SQL> exec dbms_java.grant_permission( 'SYSADM', 'SYS:java.util.PropertyPermission', '*', 'read,write' );
    and run again:
    SELECT fnc_JavaVersion() FROM dual;
    Thank you,
    Michal

    Hi Satish,
    you right. The version of the JavaVM in 10.2.0.4 is 1.4.2_04. See output.
    COMP_ID SCHEMA STATUS VERSION COMP_NAME
    EM SYSMAN VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Enterprise Manager
    SDO MDSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Spatial
    ORDIM ORDSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle interMedia
    AMD OLAPSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 OLAP Catalog
    XDB XDB VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle XML Database
    CONTEXT CTXSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Text
    EXF EXFSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Expression Filter
    RUL EXFSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Rule Manager
    OWM WMSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.3 Oracle Workspace Manager
    ODM DMSYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Data Mining
    CATALOG SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Database Catalog Views
    CATPROC SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Database Packages and Types
    JAVAVM   SYS      VALID        10.2.0.4.0 JServer JAVA Virtual Machine
    XML SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle XDK
    CATJAVA SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle Database Java Packages
    APS SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 OLAP Analytic Workspace
    XOQ SYS VALID 10.2.0.4.0 Oracle OLAP API
    FNC_JAVAVERSION
    1.4.2_04
    Best regards,
    Michal

  • RE: (forte-users) Forte Version 30N0 (aka Release 3.5) andOracle 8(i) D

    Hi Mark
    I hear you('r guessing). I'm confident that Net8 will do the trick for
    higher versions of Oracle on VMS but it's always good to have everything
    covered (!) when it comes to going to production!
    20th Century Fox - what would you be using Forte for?
    Cheers,
    Dirk
    ================================================================================================
    IMPORTANT INFORMATION
    This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and should be read only by those
    persons to whom it is addressed.
    If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by way of reply. Please
    also destroy and delete the message from your computer. Any unauthorised form of reproduction
    of this message is strictly prohibited.
    It is the duty of the recipient to virus scan and otherwise test the information provided before
    loading onto any computer system.
    SEALCORP does not warrant that the information is free of a virus or any other defect or error.
    SEALCORP is not liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in
    this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt.
    Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender
    specifically states them to be the views of SEALCORP.
    ================================================================================================

    Hi Hedzer,
    We are currently testing 3.0.N.2 with our application. I have got a CD with
    the full 4GL Development environment few weeks ago from Forte. Please
    contact Forte Support regarding other details. Here the list of bugs fixed
    in this release:
    54505, 54600, 54610, 54648, 54669, 54672, 54695, 54701.
    Regards,
    Zenon Adamek
    Information Services
    Senior Programmer Analyst
    Purolator Courier Ltd.
    Tel: 905 712-1084 ext. 3628
    Fax: 905 712-6709
    E-mail: [email protected]
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] [SMTP:[email protected]]
    Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:30 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Cc: [email protected]
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) Forte 3.5 patch
    Hi Zenon,
    Is this patch out yet? And if so, is it a push or a pull release?
    Regards,
    Hedzer van Dijk
    KPN Software Huis
    Tel: (050 58)84149
    Mobiel: 06 51276064
    E-mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Adamek, Zenon [mailto:[email protected]]
    Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:22 PM
    To: 'Nina Gelderbloem'
    Cc: '[email protected]'
    Subject: RE: (forte-users) Forte 3.5 patch
    Hi Nina,
    The bug 54610 "Phantom database connections left behind after
    application
    exists" is fixed in 3.0.N.2 (Service Pack 2 for Forte 3.5).

  • VMware tools and hardware version for Cisco vWLC

    I am currently running a Cisco vWLC (v8.0.100.0) on VMware vSphere 5.5U2 supporting about 20 APs. I just recently upgraded to vSphere 5.5U2 and I was working my way through updating the VMware tools and VM Versions on all my VMs when I glanced at this info for the vWLC. The vWLC shows a VM version of 1 with the VMware tools not running and not installed. I am curious if it is necessary or even possible to update the VMware tools and VM version for the vWLC. The vWLC is working perfectly fine and I have no issue with leaving well enough alone, but this just kind of peeked my curiosity as I really couldn't find any concrete answers in any online documentation. Does anyone have any insight on this matter?

    If it's working, then leave it alone. Some of the Cisco virtual, well maybe most, don't support the VMWARE tools. Updating the version to the latest will make you have to use vCenter as the sphere client will not allow you to edit the VM anymore. 
    -Scott

  • Runtime.getRuntime().exec() problem while getting Mozilla version.

    Hi all,
    I've trying to get the current mozilla version in Java side using
    Runtime.getRuntime().exec(). The sample code is as below.
    I've tested two cases using exec(), as case# 1 and case# 2.
    The result is after the code.
    try
    Runtime rt = Runtime.getRuntime();
    Process proc = rt.exec(new String[] {"mozilla", "-remote"}); //case# 1
    //Process proc = rt.exec(new String[] {"mozilla", "-version"}); //case# 2
    InputStream stderr = proc.getErrorStream();
    InputStreamReader isr = new InputStreamReader(stderr);
    BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(isr);
    String line = null;
    System.out.println("<ERROR>");
    while ( (line = br.readLine()) != null)
    System.out.println(line);
    System.out.println("</ERROR>");
    int exitVal = proc.waitFor();
    System.out.println("Process exitValue: " + exitVal);
    } catch (Throwable t) {
    t.printStackTrace();
    // execute "mozilla -remote"(case# 1)
    $ java TestExec
    <ERROR>
    -remote requires an argument
    </ERROR>
    Process exitValue: 1
    // execute "mozilla -version"(case# 2)
    $ java TestExec
    <ERROR>
    </ERROR>
    Process exitValue: 0
    I'm just surprised that why case# 2 couldn't get the returned version string as case #1 ? Since there will be version string be returned from command line:
    $ mozilla -version
    Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020830, build 2002083014
    Could anybody explain the problem or give any solution ?
    Thanks.
    -George.

    Hi all,
    One more question here.
    While I use Runtime.getRuntime().exec() to execute some commands,
    the commands may fail for some reason. Generally, they will return with the exit
    value set to 1 or others. But sometime, before waitFor() exits, there is a popped up
    dialog giving some info, and only after I click the "OK" button, it dispears, and
    waitFor() returns the exit value.
    So I'm not sure that could I suppress this popped up dialog, and make it run
    just like other commands ? I mean, just get the exit value by waitFor() without user
    interferance ?
    Thanks.
    -George.

  • Getting the version history of a list item

    I am creating a content web part and one the list items is used with versioning. I want to show all the versioning on the page. Is there anyway to do this? maybe using CSOM or something. In Javascript

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to get the list item version using CSOM or JavaScript.
    There is no directly way to get the list item version using CSOM or REST Api, however, there are alternative options as below.
    We can use the SharePoint List web service
    that exposes Lists.GetVersionCollection Method to return version information for the specified field in a SharePoint list.
    There is a code demo to retrieve the List1 item version, it works like a charm, you can refer to it.
    <script type="text/javascript" src="../Shared Documents/jquery-1.11.0.min.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript" src="../Shared Documents/jquery.SPServices-2014.01.min.js"></script>
    <script type="text/javascript">
    $(function(){
    $().SPServices({
    operation: "GetVersionCollection",
    async: false,
    strlistID: "Lists_1",
    strlistItemID: 1,
    strFieldName: "Title",
    completefunc: function (xData, Status) {
    console.log(xData);
    $(xData.responseText).find("Version").each(function(i) {
    console.log("Name: " + $(this).attr("Title") + " Modified: " + $(this).attr("Modified"));
    </script>
    What’s more, we can also get request to Versions.aspx page to get the list item version.
    There is an article about this topic, you can have a look at it.
    http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24423657/sharepoint-2013-get-splistitem-versions-via-rest
    Thanks & Regards,
    Jason
    Jason Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Returns Order Copy Control

    Dear Auto wizards,
    We are using the standard returns sales order in the VMS. The std copy control for the returns doc (sales order) is based on the (forward) sales order and as per the settings in R3 copy control for the sales order to order.
    The error we are facing is expplained as follows:
    If multiple vehicles say A & B are selected in a forward order and the returns order is made for the vehicle B then the returns order is picking up the value / pricing details for vehicle A. I tried several instances and realise that the returns ordr is NOT checking the 'item' or its "batch no" at the sr nos in the fwd order but simply copying the pricing values of the fwd order in the SAME sequence and not of relating to the sequence as per the returns order or in other words not picking up the pricing of B which was actually at sr no 2 in the fwd order.
    When the vehicles and / or the prices are different, the returns order gives errors.
    Any advise on ways to eliminate this would be highly rewarded!!!
    Thanks and Regards,
    Tariq

    Hi S Navaneetha K,
    I do agree and understand that there is a possible flaw in the copy control. But I beg to differ that my process could be incorrect. Do review the same, as I elaborate it further.
    I would choose 2 units...i.e. 2 batch nos (int veh nos), hence 2 VINs, hence "could be" 2 different vehicles for the SAME customer..OF the SAME sales area. As the order would be one, hence the sales areas would be required to be same. From all this, I am intending to make a sales order of two units / Batch nos to one customer. What could be wrong in this process. the customer CAN buy more than one vehicle at one time and could insist for one single document. So in my opinion the process is not wrong.
    The handling of this by SAP is wrong and if you give me a moment to elaborate further, I would say it in this manner:
    If we had a similar case in R3 where we would have made an order for the similar vehicles and invoiced. We would be doing a rversal based on the billing document. And the basic difference starts here: in R3 when we initiate a reversal, we choose the DOCUMENT..the reversal / return sales order to be created...copied from?...the forward billing doc..ALL the items get copied into the return sales order based on the copy control..correct? then IF we have partial have reversals, we go fwd and 'delete those line items' which are NOT required to be reversed. By this time the item values, sequencing everything has been copied..and after deletion we are (consciously) keeping only those required, hence the sequencing doesnt change and all is ok.
    Whereas inVMS we start from the WHICH vehicle?...meaning which batch no. to be reversed..and THEN we choose the return sales order creation action.....so we have 'already' chosen the item(s) to be reversed THEN we make the document and THEN the copy control works...unlike the R3 scenario.
    Based on this how can the functional process be wronged.? Hence the system has to be corrected rather than the process. Please do enlighten if you think otherwise.
    Regards,
    Edited by: Tariq Aziz on Jan 13, 2009 1:26 PM

  • Version of sapcryptolib

    Hi all,
    does anybody know how to determine which version of the sapcryptolib is active in an SAP system?
    I already found report SSF02 but the output is the following string:
    SSFLIBSO Version 1.555.18 ; SECUDE(tm) Version 5.4.28M-5 Copyright (c) SECUDE GmbH 1990-2007#SAPSECULIB - digital signatur
    Can anybody tell me where I can find the version of sapcryptolib in this string?
    Or is it only displaying the version of SAPSECULIB?
    Thanks,
    Bastian

    Hi Bastian,
    I use sapcryptolib.
    SSF02 returned:
    Version information:                                      192
    SSFLIBSO Version 1.555.17 ; SECUDE(tm) SAPCRYPTOLIB
    SNC for SAP Server components and SSL - Version 5.5.5C (c) SECUDE 
    So it seems, that you are using sapseculib instead of sapcryptolib.....
    b.rgds, Bernhard

Maybe you are looking for